Balanced Blitz

[fathom plinth]

I think it's too heavily in favor of the attackers in games where large armies are involved. Any time you have a large army attacked by a larger force, the larger force consumes the smaller one at too high a ratio to the attacker. It really screws close fought games and boils them down to who has better positioning turn wise.

[spark hinge]

Maybe, 35v36 is a great eg

[sand storm]

This is from the strategy channel. As you can see attackers have a slight advantage for each dice roll that happens. And those odds stack up with higher numbers. It's just how the dice rules in this game work.

[upbeat ravine]

Here is the good part:

Anyone can be at an advantage

And the “player with an advantage”
(In most cases the one who played the best)
Gets to keep their earned advantage

Meanwhile true random is a dice roll

The luckier player wins

Not an ideal strategy game

[fathom plinth]

I have no idea what you're saying

[upbeat ravine]

What do you not understand?

[gritty cave]

I like that the attacker has an advantage, promotes more interesting action, prevents people never leaving their territories

[upbeat ravine]

Absolutely