#Banned skin inconsistencies

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

dim horizon
#

I am once again failing to see why safe skins are getting banned when there are worse skins that are intentionally being let through

Clearly visible nipples through clothing is ok
Clothing that doesn't even cover anything is ok
But a faint line comparable to a single strand of hair that you can only see when you zoom into it and are specifically looking for it is enough to get a skin banned

Shyny says that before Kats passed that he got the rules relaxed
I don't want to bring Kats into this but I'm sure he wouldn't be happy seeing this

ornate cargo
#

Charybdis’ skin barely even has fabric covering her crotch and you could see Plymouth’s cameltoe from space. I’m sure Kats would have voted just the same as all the other admins. Bringing him up is in poor taste, by the way. He pushed us to relax our NSFW rules, which we have by miles. Before our change there would have been no less than 4 banned skins on this events list. We relaxed what level of cameltoe we allow by nearly half, and barely even care about nipple bumps unless they can cut diamonds or hold a full shape. We’ve made this clear time and time again that we’ve lessened what we warn for, and multiple once banned art has been removed from our banned art list to reflect these changes.

#

I’d like to remind you and anyone else reading this forum post that our internal voting procedures, what we’re voting on, and why we’re voting on it, are not public knowledge, so you have no indication what things were like before and after beyond how little we actually ban now compared to before

tulip knot
karmic goblet
#

no, banned means it's not allowed to be posted

tulip knot
#

Ok noted