#Suggestion - political memes channel
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
So you all support violence towards people as long as it's people you don't agree with
this is not what I said 🥤 👨🏻
Pence: it's not that bad or a main issue if the rich get death threats
Mort: I support this
Maybe I'm missing something so don't hesitate to correct me
Pence: it's not that bad or a main issue if the millionaires and billionaires get called "eat the rich"
Mort: I support this
here I made it more clear
calling it death threat is just silly
You’re missing something because your argument is a false flag. Firstly these kill the rich whatevers are very overblown, I haven’t seen any as a matter of fact. And then, there’s the fact that no one on Discord is ‘rich’ by that definition because it’s talking about oligarchs and social elites. So already there’s no practical reason to care. And then we consider that social class tied to wealth isn’t an oppressed characteristic, hence why no definition of ‘hate speech’ includes rich people. I don’t disagree that extreme cases could be removed, but when it’s extremely casual language like literally ‘eat the rich’ that’s not an issue at all
The rules aren’t meant to enforce some sort of divine standard of fairness, it’s to make the server less toxic. I don’t think it’s as toxic as other issues in the channel
For the use of oppressed characteristic do you mean protected status?
So your excuse is that since no "true" rich is there it's okay? Because I definitively have seen them more than once
Man, well since I assume no gay man is here..... Oh wait, it still isn't okay. Also want to add that my parents today are probably around that wealth level, while having started from simple working class families. So you're technically talking to the son of millionaires
I'm sorry, but saying hate speech isn't affected by wealth is dumb asf
That's what they always say
And then the middle class gets genocided
Enough money to be a target, not enough to buy their safety
So saying we should murder the rich is somehow different than saying we should murder some other group?
I'm sorry but I'm starting to see why people are angry. Justifying posts that want to kill a certain group and not calling it hate speech is just asking people to get angry
Like I said before
first untrue; I'm from post commie country and midclass wasn't rekt during communistic rule. second, there havent been any communist movement in western world since 2nd world war, what are you afraid of?
You have people calling the death of a whole social group and the mods are doing "nothing"
Obvious political left leaning among the mods whether they say that or not. Generally right wing or centrist views on the general populace of the servers
"I'm sure it will work this time guys"
Leads to unequal application of the rules
it worked well in USA when 1 worker was able to support wife, children and had a house and car 😄
it just led to a big debt for the millenials
not to mention industrial revolution in commielands
and general increase of living standard
More deaths than hitler
so americans panicking about communism is nothing else but neored scare 
Cuba, 10000 dollar borger
All the socialist party that became fascist like Italy or Germany?
I'm talking about people calling out the death of others
nothing more
you brought that up
Alternatively you are some leftist who has no idea about history or only some parts of history that support your view.
Do I call the mods to show them what you mean by "unequal applciation"?
aaand this is why you guys don't deserve potato memes. Took you about 6 minutes before you start spewing personal attacks.
That's true from Mort
Not a personal attack, it's an observation about the source of your reasoning.
Your flawed reasoning
That's also somewhat true
Think my grandma was a millionaire by the time she died
If I were to make a personal attack, I would call you a privileged idiot.
Just a rationalisation and avoidance of taking responsibility for your deeds.
Hope to fuck you weren’t suggesting shit about my grandma
they were
Or at least do not consider that hate speech
I think he must have misspoke
or a problem
He reexplained
#979224810817208320 message
Honestly, the tag "he him" is all you need to know about the mod political ideology
Good
#979224810817208320 message
People are gonna eat your grandma.
/s
People will try
I mean she’s dead
But come for my family members and and I will fucking end you
That means death
An accurate rationalization and yeah, I take full responsibility for my deeds. The source of your flawed reasoning is obvious and I don't back down from that. You are some leftist using history of your choosing to justify your ideological position.
Nah, he is gloating because he got what he wanted
Mort is a good dude, except when it's about the rich
The removal of potato.
Pence is the one worrying me
I have yet to see anything to that point.
Mort is you know…European…
I share other servers with him
He's basically a French
kill the rich, good food
I see
So he is one of those people who would have caused the massacre at the end of the French revolution.
I hate rich people too but the whole “eat the rich” and violence shit is out of line
Yeah I like him less
He’s croatian
One of the balken good guys
Unless you love serbs because of how insane they are
so tough, real macho man. what are you afraid of? and why?
it really looks funny
Maybe because he love his grandma?
Classic leftism
Im borderline psychotic from police trainjng
You attack a man for being a man
Im not even close to true paranoia
Masculinity is stupid
Police trainers are completely insane
Can we delete mort?
I don't think it would change a lot
Mort has a right to speak
Delete the staff team
Replace them with competent people
Let us not be like them
Man chill down @sweet kiln ☮️
We need people like mort
Obviously we keep you around
Most leftists wont even talk to us
It reminds us what not to do
Better segmentation than constant strife
Also the croatians are the “good” balkans people we need to keep them in our camp
Even if his points are absurd. It makes us think and debate
Honestly, I wouldn't mind different channels for different political parties
Potato memes version red
Feels like y'all are going off topic
Potato version blue
No it’s nice to be with people who disagree
deletes channel
Hmm yes, very mature
What is the topic anyway?
The potato memes channel, although it has kinda grown to be about the entire courthouse section :p
if eat the rich is death threat and should be allowed in potato memes?
☢️
Wouldn't it be a call to violence?
if you want to check #979224810817208320 message
this started an argument
It's hardly the main issue, possibly, but irrelevant. Last I checked we don't do calling for deaths.
Potatolord point is that this doesn't get anything while if he did the same for lets say the gays it would get a mute
They were saying murder the rich is fine to say but anyone else it's not.
Bingo
Pence's point is that it doesn't count as hate speech which is IMO profoundly dangerous if we start making exceptions like that
I think a little levity is fine in this situation.
My issue was never the removal of potato memes
It was the manner and reason why.
they quite literally warned me for posting something about "game ending" pedos
The stated excuse is insufficient.
Which implies that the reasoning is more personal.
IE it was removed because staff didn't like it.
because of this reason
So when a couple of people post objectionable content they jump at the opportunity and remove the channel.
So, like I was saying Pyro, it's more a question of "what is hate speech" than "he said that!!"
Nor are people saying you the mods are calling for anyone death
Asking for a definition of hate speech is like asking for a definition of NSFW
Which are both important.
It's absolutely impossible to define.
If hate speech is maleable as a term then it is whatever the hell you want it to be.
Not safe for work
and let start with any death threat or call for violence
If you believe this you should be removed from your job.
calm down potato
If you can't define hate speech you are incompetent
Can mean many things to many ppl, or even to the same ppl depending on where their workplace is
You're the one making the calls. Is calling for the death of others hate speech?
Your team are the one making the call for when it's hate speech
Why is that even a question, we don't do calling for the death of ppl
If you can't define such a simple term and say it means many things then you can't be trusted to be objective with enforcement.
people here are
and think it's okay
People call for the death of rich people and it's fine
No they were saying they think there's worse things, and were reasonably respectful in this weird discussion
People call for the death of homosexuals and get immediately banned.
Why this discussion was needed however is another question
Because it points to the reason why potato was removed
Bias
Political bias
Unequal application of rules
You're political bias
For sure potato was not removed for eating rich.
If you can't define the term then how I expect you to enforce the rule that says hate speech?
Well, are you going to answer? Or do you lack one?
What. I already did. One can probably get 80% there, but there'll always be subjectiveness.
Just like NSFW, if we could have a 100% foolproof definition there's never be any discussion about whether or not something is or isn't
There's actually nothing simple about any of those terms, it's all very nuanced and context dependent
It should be obvious that if calling for the death of pedos is not allowed then calling for the death of any other group is not allowed
But kill the rich memes didn't get deleted or warned while kill pedos memes did
If there were to be one exception it would be for death to pedos
And did you report that when it happened?
I tend not to report things because I'm busy and I try to trust the mods to be fair
I know the mods were in the channel and even posted there
I also don't see the point in reporting things the mods ignore
No, there is a definition of hate speech.
It's very easy to say something was left up in a spam channel, if you can't even be bothered to report.
Memes have been warned for multiple posts or hours after their posting, so saying it wasn't reported doesn't really work as a reason not to address it
If I go around reporting things all the time it just increases the odds that if I post something near the edge of the rules it will get reported and I will get warned
Well I'd ask for any recent ones to look in to, but since potato memes isn't there I assume there haven't been?
Hate speech is quite simply speech that 1. Calls for the death or ending of a certain group. 2. Puts down a specific group of people based off of immutable characteristics.
That is basically it
And it is pretty hard to show as the post is usually deleted
they're saying it isn't hate speech
Saying we should kill the rich is hate speech
I did and was told it wasn't worth it and that this channel is toxic anyway
So IT IS hate speech
Post a bad thing === instant deletion without warning
Princeps is awful for this
Which is irrelevant, as we don't allow calling for deaths. They explained why they think it's not as bad and too bad it doesn't really matter in the scope of the server
Then you ask and they say shutup
Problem is that those memes never were warned
That's potatolord problem
I reported it and was basically told to fuck off
Then why are you ok with people saying things like kill the rich?
He said he isn't
By you I mean the mod team
He isn't
I'm not, you're turning them saying they think it isn't as bad as other things that happen in the server, as them calling for deaths
Because the team as a whole obviously are
I said people called for death and he said it wasn't that bad of a thing
He then justified himself by saying calling for the death of a social class isn't hate speech
potato problem is that this attitude never had any consequences but calling for the death of pedos did
If pedo are not okay, so are rich people
Indeed
Which again, all seems irrelevant to the server. We don't allow call to action for killing ppl
So whether they think it's justified or not
You have, actually.
Does not matter
People said kill the rich all the damn time.
Never any intervention
And you can't define hate speech
As said before there's been severe lack of moderation in the courthouse
problem is that nothing was ever done and when people reported it it lead to nowhere
So you are incompetent
Don't you all always wanna go by American standards, in the US there's quite literally no legal definition of hate speech
Which is why it is almost always unjustified when it is involved in law. The definition that works is what I stated above.
Potato's problem is that calling for the death of the rich=np
and calling for the death of pedo=warning
It's perfectly civil to say that the mod team has failed that particular area of the server.
And it's still irrelevant as well, like I said, calls to action for violence or murder is not allowed
So he's confused on what's hate speech here
And that seems to be the topic
Also it's 1 am and I'm half asleep 
The topic was that it was justified in this very moment
Should go to sleep then
Take care, sleep well
And like I said what they think about that is of no concern to the fact that we don't allow calls to violence
ohoh euromate! zonebro
So that entire conversation is pretty moot
But they have allowed it
Like I said: their problem is that a lot of it went unpunished
so they're pretty angry when those people that did these death threats go on about how it as okay anyway
Definition may be moot but moderation would not be
Courthouse has been under moderated as a whole and not gotten the attention it needs
because they **feel **like it REALLY is okay there
And I said that before
But ppl seem to not care about things I said a day ago
I think everything that was needed to be said was said. You should go to sleep Pyro
Because then I get told they're lame excuses and ignored
Don't overwork yourself
Which makes it more likely that things fly under the radar
The solution appears to be to report the leftists and appeal to pyro if the reports are ignored until the leftists are banned and the mod team obeys Pyro
Agree
Report all sides
There's nothing political party about it, it's da rulez
That is the way that is supposed to be indeed
Always the us vs them mentalities lol, butt I guess it's the political section
Go ahead and rest pyro, we can figure out how to ensure sufficient moderation in courthouse later
I said what I said because the left does a great job of reporting things that can even be imagined to break the rules
Meanwhile right is like
Almost sounds like politics is cults
More like tribes
Tribalism is rampant in the server
And most places tbh
Then again what we would call pretty extreme in politics is probably closer to moderate in the US
So it definitely fuels the us vs them I'd assume
Eh, it works in the US.
People call it the great sort
Rightoids move to red states because they hate leftist policy
Blue ballers move to blue states to avoid right policy
It's why federalism and the states exist
It's also why I think a server of this side would benefit from sepperate political chats
Because it works, you go where you want
I highly doubt it works, moving states is often not an option for ppl
Anyhow not the place nor the time
Ah yes, echo Chambers galore
Better than battlefields
Or maybe ppl could just behave
Unreasonable expectations
Not really
Adults are supposed to be able to be reasonable
Tell that to the riots
Idk how ppl who think insults and yelling will win them any arguments
Adults are worse than children
People can't get along with different people.
It's just not possible
Which is why federalism is genius
One unifying ideal
I agree
Many different interpretations.
So you go where you agree
And nobody hates their neibor.
though again a lot went unpunished
You say that as if all ppl can actually move if they don't like their state
Moving is costly
And you also need a job etc
Anyhow, even more not relevant to the topic xD
Eh, it's a good model
Move to where you can stand your neighbor
Ergo
Sepperate political chats
I can stand my neighbours with different views
ppl will always have different views and opinions
Sure, still doesn't mean you have to be a dick to said person
Such becomes obvious when a given organization becomes a certain size.
Right, but it inevitably happens regardless of intent
Anyway, not happening we're not going to actively create echo Chambers
I agree, but I had some throwing eggs at those that politically disagreed with them
ESPECIALLY those past two years
And those ppl are asshole regardless of their political views
That has less to do with politics and more to do with ppl being shitty and they should get punished for that
Echo chambers are better than battlefields
Except one side believes they are justified in their shittiness.
If you want an echo chamber go to your Facebook feed, fb does a great job at feeding you what you want to see
It's why the rules are applied unequally.
Biased moderation feels justified in censoring their opposing side.
Which is why I feel no remorse for calling the lot of you incompetent and biased.
Because quite simply
The evidence says you are
Have you still have not realised these things don't add to the conversation and just make ya seem like a prick
I do not care if the lot of you think I'm a prick
So be it
Because it does add to the conversation
Also if you believe that 100% why are you even here.
I genuinely wished most of you were replaced by people who can do the job. Or that you would hire help.
We can't hire anyone, unless you plan to give us budget.
Because that's what some seem to think, that this is our full time paid job, and not something we spend our free (and even not-so-free) time doing
But we are also working on getting more mods yes.
Potato your attitude isn't doing any good right now
I feel like most of what he has been saying hasn't. I must admit for a while he seemed to be able to have a proper discussion.
He did brought some good points before you arrived
Can I get a clear definition on what the pain points are currently? There is a lot going on in this thread and I suspect keeping the eye on the ball would be helpful. Seems to me that from the staff perspective one issue they see is that problematic posts are not being reported consistently. It also seems to me that the userbase is really bothered by either actual, or at least perceived bias in enforcement of the rules.
You're right about the mods view of the problem. The userbase has a problem with all the problematic posts of a certain political side not getting any punishment in their opinion (I agree that they get far less than the others but maybe it's a coincidence)
What happened was that someone sort of tried to say making death threats to rich people wasn't hate speech
That or they weren't able to explain themselves well multiple time
Were they trying to explain themselves here after the fact (such as in this thread) or explaining themselves in the moment of the enforcement?
Basically someone said "it wasn't that of a problem since it wasn't hate speech anyway" if I understood well
let me find it
starts here: #979224810817208320 message
Point explanation: #979224810817208320 message
Seems to me the staff needs to define what kind of content, regardless of what the intent was, is welcome on the server.
The staff refused to define hate speech since it "wasn't necessary"
that enraged people more
I sometime seriously wonder if I'm the only one with basic diplomatic knowledge
I am having a genuinely hard time understanding the culture of this server... to me this has nothing to do with coming up with a definition of hate speech, but instead with defining what is and is not welcome on the server. Am I over simplifying this?
The people are angry because someone got warned for saying they hate pedophiles while you had multiple people calling for the death of a social class
So people want to know what's hate speech to the mods
does hate speech need a definition? or does this server need a blanket "calling for people's death, even in the context of a joke, is not ok" rule?
People don't trust the mods and think they're politically biased which had conflict
I tried to go that route but it didn't worked. You can scroll up to see
I am not sure why it didn't work, but I already agree with the premise. So I may not be seeing something valid from the other side.
Pyro said as much, then said about lack of moderation.
Ok, so, this server has a report system. If I am remembering correctly pyro said not everyone was using it, so stuff would be missed. There is also now this statement that perhaps there are not enough moderators. Does the staff think more moderators are needed? Does the userbase want more moderators, or different kinds of moderation than what is being executed? Is it both? Not trying to assume one side is right or wrong here, just trying to poke at both side cautiously in hopes of helping everyone coming to a better understanding of the problem in hopes of asking the right questions to seek a good solution.
Apparently they lack the found for more mods
Sorry I am not following your message
they lack the ressources for more moderators
If the staff thinks it is relevant to this conversation, could one of them let us know A) do they have a desire for more staff to share responsibility with and if so, B) what has been the hurdle to getting more staff? If this was answered already I am sorry I missed it.
I can find some info give me a minute
Yes, it is indeed a case of what the mods want on the server
#979224810817208320 message
But they lable what they don't want as hate speech
Or problematic
They don't say it like it is
Thanks
And yes I will admit I get a wee bit confrontational.
But I genuinely do believe if one of the moderators refuse to say what actually constitutes hate speech they should be removed.
Because then the cat is out of the bag
Then you know they leave the definition open intentionally
Such things are ripe for abuse
As seen in the evidence of preferred treatment for a certain political viewpoint as opposed to others.
We could at least agree on death threats that I agree
Yep
I defined it quite clearly earlier, they refuse to acknowledge and instead say the individual decides what hate speech is
Potato, I respect your take here, but I also respectfully think the way you are communicating your take is not helping to progress the conversation to a solution. Defining hate speech is genuinely beyond the perview of a discord server, especially when that can change based on context or even the nation you are in. What is more realistic is for the server have to have A) consistent rules with B) consistent guidelines on how those rules are enforced.
the rules are "no hate speech"
How can the rules be consistent when they use the term hate speech and can't define it.
He's asking what does constitute hate speech
Or more specifically
Wait seriously is that the rule?
yes
If that is “the rule” you cannot not define that, especially on an intentional server
While I think potato attitude isn't the best, his anger is rightful
That is exactly what I mean
I have multiple people from central Europe on my server, so I wrote rules that communicated clearly to them what the rules were because I knew their cultural norms were different than mine.
I imagine that is even more important on this server
There has to be an objective standard in rulemaking
It's why laws are the way that they are.
And it's why here treatment is unequal and punitive actions are taken without notice or legitimate reason
I better understand the point you are driving at now PotatoLord
The death of potato memes is only one symptom of a larger contagion
That being unequal treatment under the rules based off of political and ideological biases
difference between potato and me is that I'm more diplomatic and maybe more "naive"
Has the political bias been justly assumed based on observation, admitted to by the staff, or a possible misinterpretation based on inconsistent reporting?
That's what I'm trying to figure out
I would be fine if the server were authoritarian in nature. If only it were clearly communicated and understood.
I think this should be a pretty high priority thing to figure out at your meeting assuming that goes forward.
It hasn't been admitted but every single action I have seen has been against right wing posts. I have seen awful stuff posted by leftists with no recourse. I have had run ins with these people myself as well and I have yet to have anything positive come of it.
And I am naturally generally considered right wing
Have “leftist” posts been reported by people when they crossed lines?
So to me the bias seems obvious, regardless of what the mods say.
Often not.
Likely because they would be called a thin skinned loser by a certain one called princeps.
no
Who primarily seems to handle meme and potato chats.
you had post calling out the death of others that got nothing
BUT IDK if it's due to not noticing it or bias
yup, that's what happened to me
Maybe I am a pessimist
Pyro sounds not too bad
Ok, so let’s assume you are right in your assertion that the staff has a bias that is negatively impacting the community. I think it would be fair for the community to take some responsibility for not reporting as often as they should.
I personally did it. It changes nothing
My counter is why report when the most active users would berrate you.
and now I'm blocked for thirty days from courthouse
There is no incentive to report leftists
In fact it is discouraged
Opposite for right wingers
If I report a thing I would likely get called a child by the active users
Especially princeps
Who is awful when it comes to this sort of thing
Your case is interesting to me because you were in the wrong, admitted you were in the wrong, and apologized. How was the person egging you on treated by the staff?
Which is why I will remain in my position
Only evidence, not words will convince me that mods are not to blame
that person did threats and personal attacks every day and got only some warnings
and I admitted I was in the wrong?
Warnings, aka pointless things.
No consequences for them
I thought you apologized for the personal attack, did I misunderstand something?
I did but I wasn't blocked for that
I only did it once after that person strawmaned me and Wol for more than two hours
And yeah, I understand that I am confrontational. I understand that I can be called a prick sometimes
I was blocked for "inciting violence and toxicity" or something
That’s fair, and mods do need to take primary responsibility for community culture. I just don’t want us to forget that the community as a whole bears some responsibility there as well. But if staff is not both modeling and enforcing rules effectively we got a problem.
But I won't stop, because I am correct from my perspective. I have yet to see sufficient evidence to sway me.
Persistence pays off
We have to admit that some user did jumped on the chance on blaming the mods
Potato has reasons but some just wanted to create chaos
Oh for sure
If you don’t mind me asking, were you given screenshots or transcripts of messages where you committed the stated infraction?
Always the case with disagreements like this.
Naturally
except one that was just wrong. Like, literally wrong
Wol gets the same treatment
because you can look and I'm polite the whole way
I also was accused of inciting bullying since five months
I've only been there since march
Because it is not effective moderation
U know it's funny
I'd say some are effective
it's just that the most actives are....abusive in some areas
I ask a simple question why a post is removed.
Silence
Pissed I ask it again
Silence
Third time
Silence
Then the bastards jail me for posting in the wrong chat
Yes I don't say nice things
So here is what is bugging me, @mighty timber If I assume you did do what the mods said you did, and revoked privileges because of that infraction, I would expect they would send you something. to show you the behavior so you can correct it in the future. I am concerned that a prominent member like yourself was not extended that courtesy.
Cause you work directly with Shad right?
They refused to
Just said it was my "general attitude" and not giving particular messages
I do?
But I am justified so why would I?
Damn, can I have his number then?
Instead of answering directly I get jailed
Oh, I thought your profile picture was indicating you were one of the game knights guys lol
I just try to bring some form of diplomacy in disputes and so I always end up being a mediator

I have been duped lol
no, I just thought this picture of Nathan was funny
And I know the ticket would be useless because i would have no support from others and like all decisions it would be made behind closed doors.
I have to admit I have an attitude similar to Nathan in being more polite
Oz
Oz
I can sympathize with this, but to be fair to the staff I have no idea what challenges face a community as large as this from a moderation perspective
Ironically I'm more like Shad in attitude outside Discord
Assuming that you two are accurately representing your experiences, I am concerned by what you are telling me.
The mod I was dealing with (princeps) certainly found the time to call me a baby and tell me to shut up and follow orders
More than enough text was used that could have offered an explanation.
And the gall of that person
Tell me to follow orders
If that happened I recommend you get screenshots of it, don’t necessarily share them, but have them on hand.
As if you are anything more than a low ranking discord mod.
It was months ago
I actually argued my way out of the jail time
Another mod let me out
I did
The conditions being that I had to keep quiet.
It sort of started this whole thing
???????
What is this? A discord server for a court room?
No posting in any other channel on the topic
They said they would handle princeps on their own
Are you done lying to people yet?
Not lying
You WERE answered
Several mods have called you out on this lie at this point
And the answer was insufficient.
Anyway, I am not having a conversation with you of all people
screenshot then?
And you were warned and muted for making a scene, after I had told you not to post an epilepsy risk
Things were deleted
wdym you don't have them?
ah...
epilepsy riks?
The incident was not deleted
And it's still rapid flashing
No
There's rules for that?
No
Not lying
You went on a screaming fit and got toxic
Can I see?
That is why you were warned and muted
Yeah show them
him
!warns @sweet kiln
Total : 7
#61790677: <t:1651469592:f> - By: Princeps Astrorum#0777 (205387163439726592)
Reason: refusal to comply with mod orders and causing a scene
logs:
link
#50961354: <t:1639510125:f> - By: Aelion824#7766 (414608610715238401)
Reason: (Rules 2.4 through 2.6 - Continuing to criticize moderation in general chat despite multiple warns to use #reports )
logs:
link
#50961169: <t:1639509977:f> - By: Aelion824#7766 (414608610715238401)
Reason: (Rule 2.5 & 2.6 - Direct refusing a moderator verbal warn to use #reports , then continuing to complain about moderation in general chat.)
logs:
link
#43059831: <t:1631560595:f> - By: Escudo#0052 (666071999721766913)
Reason: rule 1.1 and rule D2: Uncivil behavior in the Courthouse category.
logs:
link
#42771937: <t:1630979214:f> - By: Escudo#0052 (666071999721766913)
Reason: NSFW meme.
logs:
link
#32229037: <t:1616421230:f> - By: SaylemVFM#6994 (302643472563830785)
Reason: Violation of Discord ToS. Posting a gif of the entire Phantom Menace Star Wars movie.
logs:
link
Which one is the good one?
Top
ok
I'd like to point out half your warns are for this exact issue
You go raging through the chat instead keeping a cool head and listening
Would make sense considering what I've seen
Can I have another link? That one doesn't work
Search princeps mentioning potatolord then find the may second warn.
What I see right now is potato being like "wtf is my meme?!?!?!" and getting this answer
Did I missed something?
Though Potato did posted multiple "where mah meme". And in not in a "please could I know where my beautiful meme went?"
Flashing gifs have been deleted here since i came here, probably before that. In case some one does have epilepsy. Personally i figure its just a common courtesy not to post those gifs. Id hate to cause someone to have a seizure.
TBH I didn't knew about that. Is it written somewhere?
Not that I can see
thanks for the link btw
Not sure. But common decency like that shouldnt need to be specified, imo.
well... I see memes like that posted all the time so I neve knew it would have a chance of causing seizure
It should be. Especially if you get warned for it
I am not seeing anything in these screenshots to suggest why the staff member in question came down so hot on potato. Yeah potato is being a jerk, but that is a hot reply from a staff member.
Just my take, I am happy to be wrong if there is context I am missing. And in fairness we are not seeing/experiencing this in the moment.
It looks like theres deleted stuff in there
Only the meme as far as it seems
yeah, and he did refused to comply
but does it deserve that level of overreaction?
he gets told to shut the f up right from the start
Yeah, that is what is bugging me…. Again don’t have full context, there have been warnings spread over many months, but that is a hot way to being a rules interaction with a user.
Such is the problem
Mods are free to delete whatever they see fit.
They delete anything that makes them look bad and leave everything else.
It is why I do not trust a thing they say
Only evidence
well, looks more about seizure than your take
Eh, instead of simply being told to take down a thing
I get harassd
It pissed me off naturally
I will freely admit my reactions may have been motivated by anger.
Not really. Ive gotten similar warns exactly that way. Its to not rile up the shit disturbers. Abrupt and to the point.
But that is no excuse.
Abrupt and to the point reads like being an arse
that doesn't excuse the attitude
No different than you towards the mods dude.
Yeah, pass
My attitude Is directly proportional to that of the mods.
I'm just on the wrong side.
I would agree but I've received similar treatment
I fundamentally do not agree with that as a moderation style. There is a difference between firm and a assertive vs abrupt and rude. Even if a member is being rude to you a staff member a staff member would be wise to keep their head.
As I said, a simple request to take a thing down will be met with compliance
Presume to give orders and I will actively do the opposite
Because you have no authority to do that, you are discord mods
Not kings
Not queens
Not my master, nor even my superior
You make requests
You don't give orders
Be aware this is the staff’s server by definition; you are in their kingdom. However to your point a wise king or queen considers how their attitude shapes the attitude of those they supposedly lead.
And quietly deleting a thing is asinine
I also add that if he didn't insisted he would've never known why
No this is shads kingdom.
Shad doesn’t own the server (at least as far as I know he doesn’t)
They are mere stewards.
Anyway, this is my position
Treat me and others with respect
You will be met in kind
Do the opposite
Be met with the opposite
That is what made me angry
I wish they would have posted the conversation in jail
That was even more interesting
I'm an american
Kings and I disagree on a fundamental level
I also think that the ticket system is a joke
You go in front of people who are inclined to support their own and expect to make a change?
It is kind of like walking into court alone with only the judge to argue that the judges sister committed fraud.
Pointless, painful, and time consuming.
It's why I tend to ask things in public chats.
So what if I make a scene? Are people that thin skinned that a question or judgement of a discord mod would hurt them?
I mean....You still need to respect basic decency
Sure I am baroque
But better to be baroque than accomplish nothing
Better to make people angry and have the server change for the better
With all due respect to your position in the community. I don’t think it is fair to say potato lord was lying. He was sharing his perspective, he shared it “colorfully”, he shared a simplified version of it, he did not share the whole context, but he did not lie. I am not trying to start something with you, but I do want to be clear about how I see things and express that to you in hopes that you can better understand how the community you are moderating is perceiving things. The screenshots beeruclues shared do show you coming in really hot on potato. Your message to him did carry a hint of abusive behavior. It is hard to moderate abuse in the community if you the moderator model that for your community. I said it earlier I will say it again, in fairness to you, I wasn’t there, I may not have the full context. What I can say is if a staff member of one of my servers posted that message in any context, I would demote them from staff and immediately DM them asking them for an explanation for their behavior. You do not owe me an explanation, I am not asking for one. I am just trying to tell you what I see.
Arguing to mods behind closed doors is pointless
I have an idea
This is not a joke
This is not a mad
This is a legit thing that would make the server better
An actual court system
So we have tickets all the time right? Tickets that accomplish nothing
Tickets like mine
Or beers
What if we instead of going in front of a firing squad get 8 non involved members of the server to weigh in.
To make the judgement instead of some moderator with a complex or bias.
I think that might build a little trust
That is 2 criteria, but who does the choosing?
Must not be chosen by mods
What is the point of staff on the sever if they cannot be trusted to both model and enforce community guidelines? Your solution is too complicated, the staff already present merely need to do what they are supposed to do already. To say again, model and enforce.
Random selection
Randomly select people who are normally active but were offline at the time of the thing
How about a mod or two and 2 or 3 uninvolved members?
No mods
7 uninvolved members
the mod and the person with issue argue
cases are made
uninvolved members decide
Man, I don’t do jury duty in real life and you want me to do jury duty on discord?
7 people talking at once can be pretty hard to keep up with
true
but voice exists
like in a game I have helped coordinate 10 or more
its not that hard
It’s a discord server… if this is the length you will go to on a discord server to get your legal satisfaction…. You need to get a hobby or something.
Making unhelpful criticisms that can be easily interpreted as personal attacks does not help. It weakens your case and makes it harder for a staff member to hear your argument.
like can you really expect mods to act objectively when another mod is at fault? in a closed chat with no other input but you?
It also is making it really hard for me to defend you in good conscience
And that is fine, but express that in a helpful way.
and bias is pretty garbage
Is the goal to yell your feelings out, or inspire positive change?
positive change
Cause you sound more like you wanna yell your feelings out to me.
The jury proposal would be much more complicated than the current system and hard to get people behind, could the current system be altered, such as a different method for choosing mods?
Then I strongly encourage you to package your criticisms in a way that help the mod team understand your perspective and give them actionable advice. Worst case scenario it makes you look reasonable, best case scenario it causes the change you want to see.
So how can I, in good conscious say anything positive about the mod team? I will not lie.
I did not say “say something positive” i said “helpful”
like I have been here close to 5 years now
no good moderation at all
in that span of time
One of the first discords I joined
back when shad was small potatoes
Helpful communication lays out what you are thinking, feeling, or perceiving, finds a good way to package that so the other party will hear it, shares criticisms with evidence, and acknowledges challenges the person may have faced, and makes a request for action to help improve things or resolve the problem.
So I genuinely want the server to be better
And the only way I can see that happening is either the removal of some of the moderators or some way to hold them accountable
Take princeps
Ok, if you feel that way, think about the best way to communicate that, provide evidence for your claims when you can (use that search feature!) lay out actionable ideas on how the moderation team can help address your problems and concerns, let them know the ways you expect those ideas will impact the community and themselves.
as far as I am concerned, her every mod action actively makes the server worse. Her deletion of things behind your back makes it hard to trust the mod team. Her lack of tact makes her incredibly easy to despise. Ironically she is also the most active of the team, especially in memes and disputatio
Be humble about the fact that you don’t know everything, don’t know the whole picture, but be assertive if you feel wronged, and let them know you want to reach resolution rather than remain antagonistic
No point in going to mods because they never do anything
I heard they would deal with princeps internally after our scuff over the gif
nothing happened
not a damn thing
they said oh if you stop talking in the wrong chat and drop it we will handle it
nothing happened
no change
no admission of guilt or poor actions
she just doubled down
and calls me a liar
You have been lying bout your warn history
I made 1 mistake
your poor impression and memorable way of doing things made me think I was always warned by you.
That is not a lie
that is you being noticeably toxic.
Shouldn't go around spreading mod hate on false information
I havent posted 1 thing in this chat about that
nothing about my warn history at all
and my early warns were about stuff that I freely admit I did wrong
Except you were lying and telling people I warned you over a gif
Which isn't true at all
it started over a gif
I warned you for the little hissy fit you threw afterwards
you warned me over my asking you why you deleted it
This is why I have no trust in our mods
No I warned you for making a scene that you admitted that you knew not to throw.
I knew not to throw it, correct
I also knew it was justified
and I stand by that assertion
You knew the proper measures to take and chose to instead scream and disrupt a channel
proper measures that accomplish J a c k s h i t
better to stir up anger against mods and accomplish something than go through the proper channels and accomplish nothing.
You did not warn him over a gif indeed, the screenshot shows that clearly.
However do you believe it is fair to say that saying via a meme “shut the **** up and post memes” was appropriate? Would you agree that it would be easy for potato in the heat of the moment to see that as a disciplinary staff action?
better to make my opinion known than hash it out behind closed doors.
Except you didn't accomplish anything
True
but there was a higher chance of doing so than in the pointless system that is tickets
Tickets aren't a pointless system
they accomplish nothing
you cant be held accountable there
so yes
they are pointless
as I said before
I was told the situation would be handled if I said nothing more in other channels
I said ok
what has changed?
That meme is used all the time by mods and users alike to say too much talking is going on in the channel
Here is how I see it.
If I post in tickets about things there is no chance of any actual change occuring
If I post somewhere else enough people can say things to force actual change.
yes I am boroque
yes I present in a colorful way
its one of my flaws
But its better than accomplishing nothing behind closed doors in a room with 1 or 2 other mods who will almost always side with the mod at fault. Even when it was said that the problem will be handled nothing changed
nothing whatsoever
your take?
I think there is a fundamental breakdown of the culture in this server, both mods to users and users to mods.
@sweet kiln
Mate look
I understand that you don't like prınceps and feel you have been wronged
But you keep on bringing up these old things to complain in the wrong channel
Along with twisting facts multiple times to make the mods seem like evil overlords
And your behavior and attitude isn't helping your case either
At this point you are very close to getting yourself banned from the server, this is just a friendly warning, just be careful
I'm not defending is attitude but that is just going to push him to his limit
He'll take that as "shut up and drink the tyranny"
Doesnt work that way. I tried many a time.
I like wise am not defending Potato’s attitude. Since I rejoined this conversation last night, now two moderators have joined this conversation, yet when they join the conversation it is merely to accuse Potato of lying (whether directly or indirectly). I said it to Princeps in a message above, I will say it again, to say he is lying is to care more about the hard facts than to care about the perception of how rules were enforced in the past. Princep’s message to potato about the gif is needlessly hot. I agree based on the screenshot that Potato was not warned for the gif but his attitude after the fact. However, it sure looks to me like Princeps decided to remind potato who had the power in a way that is a little gross. Especially when you consider that after I looked over the rules again last night, there is nothing about potentially epilepsy risk GIFs. You can say that should be common sense, but it may not be given other people’s context. If I were potato I probably would have gotten a little heated if a moderator talked to me like that as well. I am not defending how potato behaved, merely expressing a shared understanding of why he might have behaved the way he did. At this point I get that this is fairly far afield of the main topic of this thread, but I am not sure where else to put this since the conversation is happening here and it is related to how the broader community seems to feel regarding moderation on this server, as well as how that connection to the political meme channel and the dispute channels.
Alex, no offense, but you clearly haven't been paying attention
We have caught potato multiple times lying about his various warnings here in these already volatile threads to spread mod hate. (Against Discord's community guidelines btw) so yes, we are calling him out for the 3rd time for trying to rile folks up with disingenuous information that is quickly debunked
If he were being honest it'd be one thing, but he he trying to manipulate an already angry group of the community with continued lies
Enough people have already gotten banned due to their behavior here, we are just trying to stop more from being swayed into doing something stupid
That doesn’t actually address my concern. I have not seen what has or has not happened elsewhere on the server or in the past. I am genuinely trying to communicate to you that my concern has nothing to do with what potato has or has not done, that merely brought what I see as an issue now to my attention. My concern is how you addressed him. You are a moderator, and I have no idea how moderators are chosen on this server, but on my servers moderators were chosen less for their ability to moderate and more for their ability to model decent behavior that conforms to server rules. When you told potato to “learn to accept a little mercy” in regards to the epilepsy risk gif, and paired that with the penguin gif, that looks extremely aggressive. If I were a fellow moderator of yours I would ask you how you thought your message to potato modeled rule “1.1”? And I get the inherent flaw in litigating messages that old, but clearly that message had a really big impact on potato if he is still taking about it this far removed from when you originally sent it to him. And while I believe I see the intent of that message from back in February, I am worried that message said more than the sum of its parts. Is that a fair concern for me to express? If you genuinely think this is not a fair concern I will let this go.
Ok, I will stop bringing up old news. it was simply the best example I had of mods being pricks about enforcement. I'll wait for another example to inevitably show up. It shouldn't take to long you guys are just that bad.
Aye, that is indeed what it is. What he is saying is be quiet and accept that we will enforce unequally.
Since when was calling out moderators who cannot do their job fairly against TOS?
Spam and platform manipulation. With more users comes more spam. Do not use Discord to spam, manipulate engagement, or disrupt other users’ experiences, including coordinated behaviors to influence or disrupt conversations
I only do this because I do care about the server. There needs to be some way to either hold moderators accountable beyond those useless tickets which keep things locked behind closed doors. Or the current moderation needs to change.
Considering you weren't fairly doing anything as we continued to find you lying and could easily prove it
Spam I understand, manipulate engagement? What you mean make your case? That makes no sense whatsoever.
This is the 3rd time we've caught you lying to try to rile/manipulate an already volatile group
That does fall under those guidelines
You were lying, multiple times
From "she warned me 4 times" to "i was muted for a gif"
Look at de rule
I clarified this are you incapable of reading? And I said nothing of warnings here. I was muted for my asking FAIRLY why my gift was deleted
Anyway, that is the past
You clearly just want me gone
Except no again you werent
You were warned for throwing a tantrum after being told why
people stop arguing with mods. give your thoughts, discuss and if they don't accept your proposition move on. not much done by drama.

Here for the spectacle?
That is a rather pessimistic and unconstructive aproach
Aren’t these threads meant for discussions about this server so argueing is very valid.
While being insulting etc of course is bad making civil arguments is generally good.
The bad part is that the mods seemingly don’t want to engage at all even If you keep it civil it seems to me that they stay on the position of nope your fault/stop complaining
from my experience mods are quite reasonable and patient with all the shit they have to deal with
Depends on which, but Mort is right
my approach is not pessimistic, it allows discussion and change, but it doesn't allow spoilt whining until baby gets what she wants
So technically you're sort of both right
Yeah i thought the same but it is just what I observed their arguments generally were
they are just humans and can be same wrong and stubborn as everybody else, but you have no mechanism to change their mind
see them as internet judges and obey the LAW
You literally said that we should stop to argue with mods. Otherwise I agree whining doesn’t do anything
"just obey the rich and powerful"
Mortadella
(sorry for those that don't have the context)
So? Discussion is held, arguing also, so I said stop arguing.
Exactly and maybe sometimes they are unfit for the role and duty if they don’t want to engage with the community in a constructive way (not generalizing all mods as many here are rather nice)
Well then I want to inform you about the legislative branch of goverment. Laws can be changed
This is why you have ticketing and multiple mods who reply and discuss ticket internally.
Doesn’t that kinda contradict with you saying your approach does encourage discussion when you say discussion isn’t possible
are you purposely missquoting me?
This
Mort point is if the mods say no, there's no point in arguing more
thank you!
Which I would like if he applied that to another subject
you mean subjects 
heh, ignore us Shark. We're trolling each other
So in one instance you say don’t argue I say arguments are good then you say yes but whining isn’t I say this isn’t whining and now argueing is bad again
Yes and this is what I deem pessimistic
let me paint that for you:
- present issue
- mods reply
- discuss with mods
- mods conclude discussion and make decision
- comment decision
- shut up and obey the law
- there is no seven! shush and go clean your room! no more arguing
I reply later I have to go now
this is why I would never be good mod. it's like talking to a wall. unable to make conversation just semantically attacking my words. ffs why are internet people like that?
understandable
I'd mute him so hard he wouldn't even be able to buy twinkies for a month
Indeed
I like he listened to my advice 
Mortadella, the Jordan Peterson of the Shadiverse?
It’s more like:
- there is an issue
- mods make a „solution“ with little to no previous communication
- people dislike the „solution“
- people and mods argue
- mods seem pretty stubborn and are unwilling to have a proper discussion (not all mods are like that but it does feel like the moderation as a whole doesn’t want to work with the community)
- people call out this bad interaction
- „shut up and obey the law“
It's very disappointing to hear the "unwilling to have a proper discussion" when this post clearly shows how much time I've invested in trying to have proper conversations here.
I don’t want to create hostilities between the mods and the community I try to be friendly with the mods as much as possible and follow their rules
Wait a second i might have mixed something up and forgot the moderator role colour
Okay forget what I said there are definetly mods willing to argue
Yeah I think I need to reread parts of the chat again
In fact there'd be many servers where "talking" to us in the way some do would be an instant ban, I've actively been trying to get useful comments out of ppl rather than just the default "mod bad" mentality without any further info.
Tbh most of the time I live this servers moderation you guys are interactive and the popular opposite of what I critiques most of the time. This ignored by mods feeling mostly derived from this situation right now and not how the server works most of the time

While I fully understand that some like the place and might be upset about it being closed for a while, Most of the things that have been said to us or about us has definitely been in bad faith, all the way up to straight up lies about past moderation action.
In a way I can understand taking things somewhat in bad faith if you truly believe it was unwarranted, but that still doesn't give anyone the right to be rude, demanding, or entitled.
Anyone who has been paying attention for the past years will know that I approve of and even encourage discussing things, as long as we can all remain respectful. And no, just because I or anyone disagrees doesn't mean we don't listen or don't invest time or don't care.
Or complaining and refusing to elaborate because "it won't matter anyways" and we "won't change anything" etc is also not helpful, that just yelling into the void that 'x did something wrong' without telling who x is and what they did, and comes over as trying to villainise ppl (the staff team in this case) without even a shred of willingness to help improve things
I've had my say and reasonable discussion, now the uhhh... "interesting" takes about this situation are my entertainment 
There are certain mods and mod actions I do take issue with but the moderation team as a whole seems fairly chill
I agree many were rather rude in regards to the topic
I personally only deem the explanations not sufficient to explain a ban due to better solutions being there.
I did not intent to personally attack you it is just that the most common away I remember the discussions were like:
-Why potatoe gone?
- because you can’t behave
- it were only some and one could use other ways of moderation before nuking it.
-shut up and you get it back/ this would be too hard.
This then lead to people creating conspiracy theories like „All mods bad unfunny leftists“ / „mods scared of discord“
Well as far as I have seen many brought up the idea of more moderation instead of biking and so on. Some had a hard time understanding exactly why it was nukes and how to make it better. Though I think at this point there have been many interesting ideas on how to improve potatoe memes
And if there's interesting ideas we should focus on those rather than them being spammed away by ppl who only want to complain but not help improve the server
I can only agree
So what about kind of potatoe banning people, only removing them from potatoe memes (so less then a full ban but more then a warn or mute) and generally trying to cast out the continuesly trouble making people from potatoe memes.
They do, when its warranted. However what it seems like is that theres been enough posting of stuff that breaks rules, from everyone in there that this is a tempirary measure while they rework how it is, and how it will work going forward.
Outside of the trolling message/unhelpful messages, have you seen any ideas in here that you think would help improve the server in regards to this thread’s topic? If so, which ideas have stuck out to you? Not asking which ones will you implement, just ones you like.
There's been so much bs in between that it's hard to tell really.
Here is a non-comprehensive list of things that need to happen;
Courthouse needs more mods checking on it to be able to catch more things; This would reduce the load on the few mods who actually try and deal with all the courthouse stuff, and this would also create more 'balanced' enforcement, even with a lack of reports.
But on the users end there also just needs to be reports if they see something against the rules, rather than using it as a shield that "x did something worse 3 weeks ago". I don't really consider it our fault if one group of ppl is more likely to report rulebreaks than another. We might not always be as quick as we might want with the tickets, but we will get to it, and you can always poke us if it's taking long with no reaction.
We do already try to just remove courthouse from people rather than banning them outright, but this has proven to usually not be very effective (most people either leave, or go on a rampage), but it's still something we'll at least try to use yes.
I think it's also important to note that just because we don't fully agree with you, that these conversations do not impact anything indirectly. And it definitely doesn't mean that we don't care or don't listen to what you all have to say.
I also think that upon reopening we should make it very clear that this temporary closing was a strong warning when we reopen it. Any of courthouse is a privilege, an extra we try and offer (and invest a lot of time in to), but it's not the core of the server, even if some use it purely for this category.
If you have any specific real suggestion you want to reply to I'll take a look at that, but I've been scrolling up for a while and it's hard to find stuff
I think this all is a reasonable start point.
Yeah we need a starting point, not a magical solution, because those don't exist 😛
Issue is that when I say we need more moderation there we get made fun of and told that's not a solution "herpaderp we promise more moderation haha" kinda reactions 
Does the staff here have a “guidelines of engagement” for how they interact with members, and I mean beyond enforcing rules? For example, if a member is getting rude try DM’ing them and asking why they feel the need to behave that way?
If you do have that, does it reflect current standards? If you don’t, it might be worth having it.
Do you need more moderators to have more moderation? Is there a plan in the works to identify more suitable mods for the needed channels, such as courthouse?
And you also have to understand that some mods just do not want to moderate (or even be in) the political chats, if you think that's completely un-understandable, then you need to rethink the way you think about mods, in the end they're not employees, they do this for free, and I appreciate them for the channels they do invest a lot of time in, no single user/mod uses all the channels equally.
It's actually not as easy as some might think to increase mod interaction in those channels.
However, reports will make us look, even those who don't look at that specific channel, reports can truly help.
Auto correct hates me, corrected for clarity
That makes sense
We don't really do DMing users any more due to some issues that arose. But we can create tickets when we need to have a chat with someone
- it were only some and one could use other ways of moderation before nuking it.
-shut up and you get it back/ this would be too hard.
because it was so much we had to send a big huge sign to show we're being serious. potatobanning people did almost nothing sadly and warning neither.
stupid destopdiscord
Gotcha
And we also aren't babysitters, while we do want to work together with people, if people indicate they don't want to improve their behaviour to be in line with the server rules, that's very different from someone who shows improvement and talks properly with us
"I thought x was allowed because xyz, but if you say this isn't allowed because xyz then I'll try to keep that in mind" is very different to attacking us. I do understand that ppl might be upset, but still, I feel like most ppl dig themselves bigger holes when they get warnings. Plenty of ppl manage to turn even a verbal warning into a mute.
Although a note on those, verbal warns shouldn't even exist to begin with, we bot warn :p
And yes we did have to send a bigger signal, which the closing of potato memes was
When you explain it in this way I follow more.
Hurry up and add it back I want to see more people getting mad over pictures.
@true token has just advanced to level 2.
i mean if it’s towards the rich…
/s or not?
Hello everybody, don't mind me too much since I don't feel legitimate about telling my point of view about potato memes or mods in general. I'm just too new in the server for that. I just wanted to thank Beercules and Alex for trying to have a reasonable discussion with mods and users (like Potatolord) who are quite heated by this thread, as far as I see. Moreover, I have very experience of this server and am not very good in English, so I find it good that people manage to put words on my impressions concerning memes channels (especially the fact I've seen right-leaning memes more often taken down than left equivalent memes, I might be biased since I find right memes more funny, but I don't feel like I'm 100% wrong according to what other users seems to have experienced according to what they tell here.) I won't judge mods because of how new I am to the server, but I agree with Alex about the quite disproportionate nature of Princep's reaction to Potatolord's memes (according to the screenshot, I wasn't there at this time and thus probably don't know the whole context).
my pleasure. That's kind of the minimum for me
also I've seen almost everyone (except few users and one mod, if I remember correctly) talking only about warns and bans in terms of sanctions. I personally don't like the banning solution, because it lasts generally forever. I've been banned one time from a server I enjoyed very much, just because of an heated argument with a mod about the reason of a mute I've had. I had the time to reflect on my actions and regret the things that made me muted in the first place and what I said to the mod for being banned, but I also was very sad about the fact I will never be able to go back to the server anymore. This is why nowadays I consider banning indefinitely as an extreme sanction, and viewing a mod (I don't remember which one) on this thread talking to Potatolord about his probable ban made me remember all these bad memories and wishing it won't go this far, since, although I don't know Potatolord very well, he doesn't seem to me like a bad guy, certainly not the one who deserves to be banned only after some warns and arguments. I think it will be better to flavour lighter sanctions, such as temporary bans, mutes or temporary prohibited to talk in the specific section he was causing trouble (like the potato ban I've seen applied on Beercules for example). I don't know if the ticket system is efficient or not, I've never thought about using it since I usually isn't the kind of guy to say "this meme shouldn't be allowed, please remove it", but in a very active community like that it is theoretically a good solution, I've seen this kind of thing used in another big server, where it helped spamming bots to be taken down very quickly. But if only one political group of person uses it to silence the people that posts memes that says things they don't like, then it is not so good. I agree with, I believe it was Pyro, who said in this case it's not a moderator problem.
sorry for the long post I've read all the things that was said here recently only today
I agree with you
Though I've seen some ban done for...small reasons
a mute would've been better
also I totally agree with you and other people about the fact that if memes telling to kill pedos or other kinds of peoples are not accepted, memes telling to kill the rich (or clearly portraying them as inhuman villains) should be taken down too
I'd show you how few people we have actually banned, but due to the antiraid bot having banned thousands of raiders the ban list is a mess, mainly of deleted users 😂
So I saw to one of the few then
Don't worry Pyro. I think most are like me, and less like the angry mob
They just are the silent majority
You get the idea lol
All of the deleted users, thousands of em
I wish there was a way to clean them out
to be fair i will admit yall handle it in a much fairer way then i do in the servers i moderate, i just remove people who cause the problem, ie remove roles from repeat offenders and if they leave they leave, it means little to me
Being quicker in removing troublemakers could help, but we do also want to make things work, and not just Yeet ppl who add to the community in some way
dont think ya can cause im pretty sure thats tied to the banned list if ya cleared em they could rejoin, not a issue on deleted accounts but still
not 100 percent on that python codes weird
Yeah I do have a script I made in the herald to unban deleted accs
Butt it would also spam the auto-mod channel to oblivion xD
anyway you mentioned at the end you wanted suggestions
Id suggest a flat @ us warning right now for anyone yall think have a habbit of breaking rules in tato land, from me to avery and everyone between, then give a date for the reinstatment of tato memes
Tell each of us what are particular issues are
So we can better ourselves
Then if we continue acting up remove the channel role as ypu said well either act up and get banned or leave on our own accord
Either way no longer a you issue
I appreciate the thought, though but I don’t wanna start anything with the mods about that one moderator action with potato, just saw that moderator in chat and thought I would ask, it was long enough ago that I don’t see the value in making an actual issue of it.
Might make things easier to just run it for say 20 min clear em then turn it off
Anyway thats my suggestion
I cleaned them out, there's 650 left, of which over 500 are from the antiraid bot but those ones haven't been deleted yet.
We have a whopping total of 130 bans or so left if we discount those, just to give an idea :p
Given how the Server has 7000+ ppl...
Given how the server has been around for years.... 😛
Have you considered the No XP in the potato channels and a minimum rank for potato memes idea
I made a forum topic for it that has more specifics
I have been a wee bit hard on you mods
My apologies
But I do think there needs to be taken to reduce or eliminate bias in enforcement actions
Beyond simply limiting problem posts in chat.
Because those will never fully go away.
We're trying
a bit of both
I heard potato is back, and I'm happy, but now I'm pissed because I can't see it due to an arbitrary level requirement...
can't be a meme lurker around here... and now I have to do the worst thing ever and talk and talk and talk...
You're free to be a #memes lurker
particular reason why?
probably just to keep people from rejoining on an alt and instantly spamming shit that got them banned in potato
Also means people have to be invested to do the speaky speaky
Gives them somethings to lose and thus more likely to follow the rules
no, I mean why is it better than memes?
cause it is, the political memes here are gold
regular memes doesn't make me laugh half as much
now I'm grinding gatehouse and attempting to "socialize"
IME half of the memes were "kill the rich" or legit call for violence against wealthy people, the other half was "left can't meme"
with some gems here and there
Ah yes the "maidenless?" Questline
I should have that one auto completed by default
Thats the fun tho
First time I hear death threats are fun
Moreso ment the left cant meme but iright
Post cute animals in #castle-menagerie
Wait is potato actually back but level-locked?
@marble barn has just advanced to level 5.
Yes
While I am interested in medieval topics along with writing and other subjects here, I have difficulty contributing to large, active servers since things move too quickly
I understand the mods want us to engage more and I suppose I may make more of an effort but for me, it's always been difficult to establish a sense of community when things are too crowded
If the goal is to make us engage it's not gonna work very well, I'll simply engage until I hit lvl 10 than resume lurking in potato meme
The goal is to keep away trolls I think
Exactly
Trolls won't usually want to engage until lvl 10
Guess I'll just leave a msg a day here till I hit level ten just to troll and watch people troll.
you gotta wait till 12 to buy a gun in usa
so you gotta wait till 10 lvl to post in potato
Bad bait, try better so I can get to 10
Indeed
mortadella detected, activating anti-leftist defense systems, insult cannons loaded
No need for insults. Let us be the civilised people here
Gross, explains the uneducated bait.
Fascinating
fine fine, I'll just hunt down mortadella's address and then stick a bunch of Trump flags in his front lawn, see how it goes
I'm thinking a few hundred of the flags
Beautiful
daily msg to get exp so i can watch people getting mad in the pol memes channel again.
I think we can technically post once per minute if I read correctly though at a certain point that might be a bit spammy
