help connection attack

[proven fulcrum]

why not just weld their root or make their walkspeed 0?

@upbeat radish

[upbeat radish]

if you root their root is that better?

[proven fulcrum]

anchor it i mean

itll stop them from moving or getting moved

walk speed will stop them from moving

[upbeat radish]

yeah but i want the attacker to keep moving

[proven fulcrum]

you dont have to weld them together at all

eHRP.Achored = true

and see if thats the result you want

[echo mist]

do not weld characters together

it messes with network ownership

[upbeat radish]

no because that stops the animation also from playing at the enemy

[upbeat radish]

so what do i gotta use then?

[echo mist]

find another way without directly constraining the characters together

e.g have invisible part that moves with the other player by script, like set cframe, and constrain to that instead

[torpid radish]

are you trying to make a combat skill where the enemy is stuck in a beatdown or something? if so, set their jumppower & walkspeed to 0, thats the best way

[winged prawn]

** You are now Level 1! **

[torpid radish]

(assuming u already have a stun system)

[upbeat radish]

i have

[upbeat radish]

no it is like a connection attack

so a animation for the victem and for the attacker at the same time

so like a throw

[upbeat radish]

so like having two humanoidrootparts together is buggy but with a part in between can work?

[upbeat radish]

like this

he can still turn and look arround

[torpid radish]

im pretty sure theres an invisible part connecting them both

[upbeat radish]

so if i just connect both there humanoidrootparts it should work?

[torpid radish]

cframe/motor6d parenting might work

try that

[upbeat radish]

to the part

[echo mist]

the problem is if you constrain 2 players together then they become part of the same assembly and network ownership becomes ambiguous

which is fine if one of them can't move

but if they can both move its a bit awkward

[upbeat radish]

yeah but i tested it with a rig, the old method, and the rig can't move but it was buggy

[upbeat radish]

so this could work?

@echo mist

[echo mist]

...you still need to deal with the ambiguous network ownership

google roblox studio network ownership bruh

there's a few other odd effects but ye just play with it and see how it works and what happens

sometimes code you write is not production code, it's just to test and prove how something behaves

that's how people seem to know things in advance of doing them - i don't know things in advance, i've just done a lot so i already knew beforehand, and things i don't know i will test extensively to confirm behavior

all experience scripters pretty much the same

[upbeat radish]

Alright I’ll check into that

But do you know a solution?

[rugged trout]

So like a grab attack?

[upbeat radish]

Yeah mate

Do you know any solution

[upbeat radish]

I still need help

[proven fulcrum]

Should prob learn fundamentals

[upbeat radish]

yeah im just gonna read the devform

[rugged trout]

For a grab attack you should probably add a part to the hand, the. Make the victim’s root part get welded to it

Sry for being late

Then remove the weld when the victim is released from the grab

Idk if u alr tried that just a suggestion

[rugged trout]

This might interfere with something like a movement buff status effect and then you’ll just be permanently slower

[torpid radish]

just revert it after genius 😭

[proven fulcrum]

Ppl don’t use walk speed managers in 2025?

[upbeat radish]

what is that

[upbeat radish]

yeah i found the solution

but i want the camare to move with the player

how do i do this?