#💡 Don't accept any mods with prior warns/bans.

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

spiral kiteBOT
crude atlas
#

in a perfect world yes, but its kinda difficult

whole rose
#

@bronze needle it’s justifiable to not accept people with prior bans, but not accepting people with prior warns is just harsh

#

a lot of staff including me had former modlogs

crude atlas
#

cant relate 😭 🙏

bronze needle
#

but otherwise idc if its harsh it should just be the standard

whole rose
bronze needle
#

i'm saying it because it should just be the standard

ornate anchor
dark vigil
#

As a person who got banned for sending a free UI... I'm in.

bronze needle
dark vigil
bronze needle
# dark vigil 2-3 years

I mean thats something that can be forgiven, a lot can happen within 2 or 3 years. But I've noticed a pattern where users with hella warns/bans are also the most active, which makes them more eligible for staff

dawn heath
#

yess, we don't want amir back

untold dove
#

I've been banned for a genuinely false reason (misunderstood my message), and they unbanned me as soon as I explained what I meant

#

Having something like that immediately cast you out of the pool for moderator wouldn't be fair at all

#

(Especially if the ban reads terribly on your name; this idea only works if you were unbanned for pity)

#

Also, I thought that's what the meaning of "No major ban history" was?

crude atlas
#

bans definitely contribute to it, but if your ban is for a lesser important reason and/or an old ban then it could affect the process

#

same with warns, if theyre about to expire / are minor warns then they arent taken into consideration as much

sharp matrix
#

Hang on

#

I had a bunch of prior warns and a ban

#

But I was also mod twice

#

I don’t like this suggestion

dull grotto
#

people make mistake