#💡 Only people with ranks level 3 or 4 can apply for ranker role for whatever they do.

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tardy dockBOT
twin swallow
#

??

#

most of the active rankers are rank 2

#

if you restrict it to 3 and 4 nobodys ever gonna get a role 💀

#

what a shit suggestion

carmine vessel
twin swallow
#

we do

#

just because we cant do it ourselves doesnt mean we dont know it

carmine vessel
#

i mean

#

at least not on scripting

#

i think the other ranks are ok

#

but scripting

twin swallow
#

if you left it to only 3 and 4 you wouldnt get ranked

#

most rankers are rank 2, and we dont get many ranker apps

carmine vessel
twin swallow
#

and less for ones like vfx, clothing, etc

carmine vessel
#

as i said i think rank 2s for every rank but scripting is ok since its something you dont need much knowledge about to tell if its good

#

at least not as much as scripting

#

i think for scripting only s3s and s4s should be rankers or there should be 2 scripter rank roles, one that ranks s1 and s2 and one that ranks s3 and s4

twin swallow
#

we already have an overflow of scripter tickets even with rank 2's and alot of the scripting rankers consist of rank 2's

#

imagine no rank 2's, nothing would get done

steel cliff
# twin swallow just because we cant do it ourselves doesnt mean we dont know it

There is a high chance that if someone is s2, either :

  • will not allow you even to get to s3 since himself isn't s3, so he can't verify if what you do is correct (in some cases, and that some isn't small 1%)
  • (Will not even give you s1, since he thinks with s2 he's a god (I think very rare, but it did happen to me)
    Imo... or I'll just add a new suggestion. I've got an idea
twin swallow
#

and if it did happen to you open a support ticket and request to speak to ranking management regarding a ranker complaint

twin swallow
#

why not?

twin swallow
#

no, we read it to make sure no ranker is being toxic, biased etc

#

ranking management dont actually know the requirements for each skill rank

#

therefore opening a ticket to report will have management group up rankers, ask, and come to a final verdict

steel cliff
#

... well you either didn't read mine or that guy is out. I need to check. Forgor what was his user, lemme find maybe I took a ss of our conversation...

twin swallow
#

which would include more rankers vouching

steel cliff
#

well...

#

Honestly I need to think of an anwser

#

I'd still stay with my point. I've made a new, let's say "less harsh" suggestion. Imo this person's one is better, but if you need rankers DOWN BAD then mine could increase their amount. Really out of 30k people there are so few rankers?

#

oohhh...

#

you're a rank 2 ranker yourself... well I mean, look I know you'd rather stay a ranker, and for GUI imo it's no problem

#

but as with scripting ... well there I see many problems why S2 shouldn't be scripter rankers

lunar ice
#

S4 already requires S4 ranker approval

#

S3 requires extra ranker vouches if it's by S2 ranker