💡 Automatically delete suggestions when their <:upvote:829996643063169024> to <:downvote:82999665...

[cold veldt]

Please discuss this idea civilly, don't forget to vote on this idea in #📝︱server-suggestions!

[real summit]

@blazing night

[low heath]

I hate this idea

+Upvote

[lost drift]

hed this idea suck and i hope you loose all of the doritos in your house

[real summit]

Mad?

[lost drift]

fr

[low heath]

Ongorga?!?!??!

[real summit]

Orga

[lost drift]

on gorga

[low heath]

Also stop pinging me 💀

[real summit]

@low heath

[lost drift]

shu the fk up grunk u are my bbg

from now on 🔫

[real summit]

@low heath

@low heath

[lost drift]

@low heath

woops

[real summit]

Mad?

[lost drift]

say mad

im fat

ongF

frfrfa

fasdgasdgas

[low heath]

https://tenor.com/view/you-good-bro-gif-21239575

[low heath]

God I love this video

[blazing night]

wait for it

[glad lance]

this is a bad idea

[real summit]

@blazing night WHY ARE YOU STILL TYPING

BROO

STOPP

[blazing night]

start to get scared of what will happen in 5 minutes

[real summit]

you son of a bitch

[blazing night]

I would suggest that suggestions with a high number of should trigger an autoping to a specific part of the staff, who will take care of them, verify them and consider them if they are feasible.

---

This is because many times it happens that there are good suggestions but the staff doesn't see them, and therefore it's up to users to ping the staff to get it officially approved or not.

---

---

---

In relation to this, I would suggest officially creating a small team (made up of people from the staff team) who are responsible for carefully reading all the suggestions, commenting on them so as to make the user understand what's wrong, what's is it good, etc....

---

And at the same time this team tries to implement and improve the suggestion in order to make them more feasible and efficient, and finally the same members of this small team will propose the idea to all the staff and tell why it's good for the server, etc....

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

I'd tell you that the idea of ​​archiving isn't very nice

It's not a channel where there are 10 daily threads, and therefore you need to decrease the number of messages in the channel a little

Also leaving the suggestions in the channel is good because users can re-read, make comparisons, repost, etc... the old suggestions

---

---

---

If we really have to archive suggestions, I would suggest archiving not based on the number of and and not archiving them in a private chat.

I would say to file in a public category where users can continue reading but not write and to divide between accepted suggestions, suggestions in progress/to be implemented and declined suggestions.

This could be work that could be donated to the small team I was talking about earlier, then archived in an orderly manner

---

---

---

---

🙂

[blazing night]

ban

I didn't write much, I just wrote neatly and separated into chapters

[real summit]

ok let me reference each of your sentences as a number in order:

1. fully agree, this would prevent suggestions from getting ignored
2. yep
3. i don't feel like it's necessary
4. right
5. with archiving i meant copying their suggestions and putting them in a public channel where no one can type
6. fair
7. true, but it would still work in the acrhive
8. okay
9. like i said on no. 5

@blazing night ^

[blazing night]

where is your big and argumentative text

[real summit]

up my ass

🔥

[blazing night]

.-.

[blazing night]

4. right```
if you like chapter 1, verse 4, then you must also agree whit chapter 1, verse 3

[real summit]

🧢

[blazing night]

so you will add a new little and exlusive team formed by 2-3 moderators 🙂

[lost drift]

guys in the end this is shit and i hope all women hate hed for life