#Photography
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
but i got some nice photos of that same place, years after
still nice place
Hey that’s good
this one will be printing too
i hope my living room have enought room for my photos XD
those are really nice photos man
Thanks :D
congrats
@wise patrol
nice river
gib chimken
i didnt ate, but my mom says it was delicious
fire
and it was hot
really hot
i could feel the fire from 10 meters far
Beautiful!
Birds! 
Thanks! :D
I took like 72-78 photos of airplanes n stuff earlier today, we’ll see how they turned out
Finished off one roll of film and shot two more
70-200 f2.8 and it is amazing.
Sorry no idea
We don't do home prints (yet)
May not be exact but should help you chose off of what feel you’re going for.
prints = photos
like develop a film
uhm
well
forget it, too much more expensive
yeap
was execat this
thanks all
Oh, you meant photographic enlargements?
Stuff like this?
Like the ones we used to have on albuns
2700 USD. Worth every cent. I LOVE this lens.
Some of my faves from the 70-200mm
Just zoom in. Like, it doesn’t matter if this lens is at F8 or f2.8. It’s. So. Sharp.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I’m about to have to spend $300 JUST TO DEVELOP FILM
HAHAHAHHAHA

I dropped 1870 on a new lens that arrives Tuesday. 🤘
Aaaaaaanf this is why I consider not buying a modern platform
New lens? Ooooh shinnnyyyyy
Old platform no new stuff but plenty for everything I need/want
Lab or home kits
$300 at a lab would be wild
But I do have cheap labs here
Lab- and it includes scanning, plus I don’t trust myself to do it
I don’t want to mess these pics up
And it’s more than 20 rolls
Ah scanning too
Goddamn
I broke a filter. You can guess how
hehe
bro, just buy a digital dslr
CAT
chicken
I really really need to but this is my current only camera
are u checking what models?
no problem bro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gQYM3oYtAI&ab_channel=FoxTailWhipz i was checking this
Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 https://foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack
These 5 cameras all take great looking photos, are interchangeable lens, and cost under $100 used!
5 Incredible Cameras Under $500! https://youtu.be/LhxxheeyxQk
Buy the Sony NEX C3
here: https://shorturl.at/fgyM4
or here: https://ebay.us/LK...
sonds fair recomendations @feral vector what you think ?
I’ll probably go $300-$600
Nice
And
Z6 iii released
Hehehe
For the best deals on pre-owned camera gear, check out KEH! They're PetaPixel's Official Pre-owned Camera Gear Partner: https://bit.ly/3JubxUP
—
The Nikon Z6 III is finally here! Featuring the first ‘Partially Stacked’ CMOS sensor on the market, this looks like a camera that can tackle nearly any photo or video task you throw at it. How does i...
its a weird mix. partly stacked sensor... but smaller mp count. so Im curious to see banding issues in E-shutter mode. since most of the speed is on e-shutter, the shutter limiting it a lot.
Is it a big deal that canon won’t allow 3rd party lenses?
Doesn’t that make it more expensive to be in that ecosystem?
I’m trying to be somewhat economical here
And I’m also not sure on spending $600+ on body alone
Should I go Nikon or Sony or something instead? Really don’t know what I’m doing with digital
any of the major three in raw will be fine. just changes a tad how you edit. imho, Nikon has the best raw colors so I dont have to adjust much if at all. Canon is more muddled but can look just as nice after post.
for me it always comes down to erginomics. Nikon is the best at that.
sony AF probably the best but you're holding a brick. also has the most lenses first and 3rd party.
oh and Sony tends to have a green tint to everything that has to be edited out. Its slight, but its heavy on the green band.
No real grip. Its just a rectangle.
Ahh ok
it feels bad and like im going to drop it in my big hands.
Green tint doesn’t bother me too much, I do mostly nature stuff, and mostly use fuji 400 film which is also green
its not terrible either, just, no such thing as a perfect camera.
Yeah nothing is perfect
Thx for the input
Also I know DSLRs are being replaced but are they really that bad? I don’t expect to be getting newly released lenses and everything is cheaper
No. The big advantage to mirrorless is, you know how the shot will look when you take it. DLSR you have to do preview, some math and some guessing and reviewing.
Ah ok
Well… SLR is entirely guessing
Sounds like really anything will be an improvement all around
DLSR does have better battery life, but also slower AF. Even the OG Nikon Z6/7 have better AF. (Which wast bad like everyone made it seem. It just wasnt as good as the other brands out the gate)
How slow is slow? I’ve gotten decently ok (not great) at manual focus
But I can be decently fast
I just assumed any autofocus would outpace me
Its not unusable. Just not as fast and more importantly, not nearly as many AF points. Like the lower end Canon rebels have like 7 AF points, Even a 1k not on sale Nikon Z5 has over 250 AF points.
Woah only 7 points is low
Im at 493 AF points on the Z8. So it can grab focus nearly any place in the frame.
I see
153 AF points on the Nikon D850, which is the DLSR brother to the Mirrorless Z8.
but again, that doesnt matter if you're mostly just shooting trees. 7 is enough. Trees arent running and you can take your time reference the sun. But if you want to shoot peoople, the more the better, so it can nail the eye every time.
I like getting birds
Trees
Occasionally people but not much, maybe I’d do more if it weren’t almost a dollar per shot
birds would 100% benifit from more AF points especially if in flight.
For sure
Well if works
Would be nice
ohhh
wait
film
ohh
it even have variable ISO, im curious about how that works
Most film cameras have variable iso
You set it to the ISO your film is rated for
I think instant film is all 800iso tho, so those don't have iso settings
ISO is sensitivity to light
Lower iso is less senaty
Higher ISO is more sensitive
High ISO on film usually means larger grain
High ISO on digital is usually more noise(?)
that i know
i have a question about the variable iso on film cameras
since, diferent from digital ones, i think you can't change the film iso without change the film
MPB just bought my Z7ii for 1350. Nice.
You can you’re just reallly not supposed to
well you can*
Changing the ISO dial won't change the films sensativity, but it will change what the light meter is calculating. So if you are using 200 ISO film and set the camera to 100 ISO, you will end up overexposing by a full stop
(pulling film)
if you have 200 iso film and set the camera to 400 iso, you underexpose by a stop (pushing)
its pretty common for people to push and pull B&W film
Push for darks to make richer more saturated colors. 🤯 all the saturation!!!!
Bootiful. My national animal
Thank you I was lying down in wet grass beside water for ages to get this one and just by chance the 💧 is there which looking amazing I think
Waterbirds are just incredible! Photo came out incredible. Definitely paid off
Thank you 🙏
That’s AF2
Vice Pres
well, sometimes they use it for other important people
But usually Vice Pres
Soooo
One disposable camera has been lost
Haha
Somewhere between Tampa, key west, and Miami
Likely in the Everglades lol
somebody will have fun with the last few, I hope, and then develop and see what my siblings took
I need to try Phoenix at 100iso
I shot mine at 200 but it was very bright out
Can’t wait to get it developed
It was St Augustine FL so very bright and hot, and old Spanish architecture and stuff so lots of reds
Maybe put a note on it saying it's color film and needs to be developed in C41
Why?
Some labs see the Harmon name and develop in b&w
If the lab sells Phoenix, probably won't be an issue
Also your scans might be bad from it. Phoenix has a very unusual film base color and it can mess with lab scanners
They do
Then you're probably fine
But some people have gotten screwed over
And it says it right there
That doesn't mean every lab tech reads
Yeah true
The final countdown.
Mines out for delivery today
I once had UPS rate a single mouse as 200lbs
😂😂😂
My buddy on the ship had a friend that worked USPS and would label 70 pound boxes as 40 for cost and shipping limits.
well fuck
fedex beat amazon
I have a digital camera and no SD cards
why do I have a dozen micro sd card adapters 😭
oh
someone left a CF card in it
wow 16gb
oh
nice
Thank you 👍
AF2 is a 757 while AF1 is a 747
Got some sample shots coming your way soon.
The z8 is beautiful
I immediately formatted it
Pakaaas
The light is sick
Make sense
@deft garden don't know how is the city of us these days, but how about you try take some shots of Orion?
I’ll try tonight. If it’s over the ocean I can see it. I’ll also try moon.
How do you get the background so dark? Editing?
Usually but this time was just the proper lighting.
Ahh ok
😂😂 lion yeah. They were asleep and hiding by the time I got there.
It’s ok. I get confused all the time too. My wife always yells at me. 😂 the only one I know for sure ever is the Amur leopards.
Nice
More samples from the zoo yesterday.
What amazing "onça" (the big cat)
In the US/English we call those Amur Leopards.
Ah, the one in here isnt a Jaguar as onça translates to.
I need a larger memory card. The one I have only holds 3.2k photos on it at 45 mp. I don’t think that will be enough at the air show in September
Da Zoooooooo
I need to go to the zoo again sometime soon ngl
Very good
It was saying sorry for my shutter cable freaking out
shutter cable decided to go crazy and hold the button so when I wound film it immediately took pictures
Yeap was my mistake
They look so close
😬
3.2k
How you are going to edit that
maybe not
Carrrrrrr
Slight beano reveal 👀
Haha no face
is like try to guess how @low fox looks like by her Feet
Nothing yall haven’t seen before
Here you go. Some ducks at 540mm
So fluffy😱
And a crap ton more meerkat at 600mm. 😂😂😂 I plan to do the moon tonight since it’ll be 99.8% illumination.
I also want to do some surfers at some point too now that it’s summer.
CUTE
PHOTO DUMP SOON
2.5 WEEK TRIP PHOTO DUMP
17 rolls (plus one not from trip)
this should hold yall off for now ig
not the best but cool
Heat damaged pretty sure so green
its not fuji
its either Gold or ColorPlus 200
weird that its not warm
was midday
incoming
FlicFilm Aurora 800 ^^^
Sunny, Shadow, crabs, and Ft Matanzas in St Augustine
Couple photos from the roll of Phoenix 200, but they didnt reverse the negatives so im gonna make them do that
more will come later
man this has GOT TO BE my FAVORITE roll
HP5+ at universal FL Cabana Bay
Holy pictures
nearly 600??? but i am NOT uploading all
Fuji 400 at Charlotte Douglas airport overlook ^^^
Everglades and Key West on (I think) Fuji 400 ^^^
Ft Myers Beach on probably Gold 200
Ft Myers / Everglades probably Fuji400 ^^^
Eustis and Mt Dora on Gold 200 (I LOVE THE CAR PICS THEYRE SO COOL)
nice photos
Rural TN and Pigeon Forge Fuji400
TY ❤️
Silver Springs and Mt Dora ^^^
FJ400
Places along the way, Fuji 200 or 400 cant remember ^^^
Universal studios FL Color+ 200 ^^^
@feral vector Florida photo dump done finally LOL
some really good ones but most are "ok"
I excluded the trash for data saving
nice !
The moon was hiding behind clouds all night so I didn’t get to do moon shot.
Ooh, a Ford Edsel
Nice
@jagged lake maybe you should get a used DSLR instead of new mirrorless
Optical viewfinder is nice
Oh?
You mean the fact that the viewfinder isn’t a screen, and is with the mirror
Like SLR?
Oh
You don't have to spend it all
But it would open up a lot of options
And a lot of quality glass
I mean I have that saved but I was hoping to use it on my PCs
Start saving up a camera fund
May do that
iPad pro m4 13" with apple pencil pro would be great
I don’t need more hobby
I don’t really like drawing but it’d be a lot cheaper if I did
Does ther50 not have that?
Ther50
The r50
Yes
Mirrorless cameras do not have optical viewfinders
They have a tiny screen in the viewfinder instead, aka an electronic viewfinder
Oh.
Some mirrorless cameras skip the EVF and just use the rear screen
Ew
A small number are rangefinder style I think which puts the viewfinder in the corner but it optical?
I've never really understood rangefinders
Just a different style
ok then
I’ll keep SLR accuracy
still dunno if dslr or mirrorless tho
Dslr so much cheaper
hmm
Brother may have his old dslr I may buy it off him
Not sure
Nikon or canon from circa 2015
I know nothing about Nikon unfortunately
Also aps-c will be more affordable and allow you to use cheaper crop lenses or full frame lenses
Nikon DLSRs are legendary especially the D750 and D850. Annie Leibovitz uses them. Mirrorless got a bad wrap for not as good AF and being late to the mirrorless game behind Sony and Canon. But not bad and even has surpassed them in some areas, like stacked sensors (Sonys global sensor came after)
Could be worsee. You could bave chosen the whole car route 
Cars are expensiveeeeeeeeeeee
I feel like I might
I’ve always liked cars
I just don’t have one of my own
Even if it’s not a hobby and just a car. 😂😂
ehhhh thats not entirely true :P being a car guy can become a hobby. especially when you start looking at engine upgrades, cosmetic enhancements etc.
I’m saying cars are expensive. Ofc it gets more so when it is a hobby. But cars are just expensive.
very true 😅
base model 2025 Civic is like 25-30k
its crazy how expensive they have become
ik Honda is rolling out a 2025 Hybrid Civic soon 👀
A mid to low trim Subaru is 6k less than a Mercedes suv.
ive been looking into those too lol
base model Outbacks are stupidly priced.
the wife got lucky and got a 2016 Forester XT Premium for 18k at a used car dealership
those usually go for a good 30-35k brand new 🫣 if not more
I’m in a paid off 2014 Jeep. One tire is 315 usd. I had to replace 4 last month. 180 a month for insurance (stupid California prices and since top comes off I get hit with sports car premium) I refuel once a week, 100 dollars a pop so 400 a month in gas. That’s just to fucking drive. 😂
oh goddd 😂
im not looking forward to replacing the tires on the Forester they aint gonna be cheap i think lol
My tires went up 75 dollars a tire from 2 years ago
the price of everything keeps going up 
Too bad pay isn’t. 😂😂
nope unfortunately
I mean. I just got .69 an hour raise this last pay period. But that’s not even an extra 2k a year. It’s like 1800 ish. 🤮
Oooooof thats not very fun
But wait! Dont forget that the gooberment will take more now because of that 😂
I got a .28 raise too 
I cheated. I upped my PAC contribution which is pre taxed and it kept me at the same pay. 😂😂😂
we like cameras
Dang lmfao
Oh good
I got 3% -.-
My gf wants to buy winter tires for her Crosstrek and it was looking to be $800-$1200
Yesssss lol. I wanna test drive it eventually. Theyve always made a Hybrid since at least the 7th Gen
Jesussss thats insane lmao
My moms Subaru ascent just got hit and we’re waiting on inspection
Likely totaled tho
:/
damn sorry to hear that Beano 
Hello
Howdy
Beautiful photos
Thank you
WOW
Got some moon shots but I have to edit them later tonight. Nap time for work
yeahhh
New Camry is hybrid standard
I was wrong
Just $700-$800
Hybrids are so nice honestly
i feel like Hybrids will be more of the way forward than full EV tbh
Electric vehicles of some sort are the future
However the push to make giant EVe before making everything a hybrid first was pretty silly
Yeap 180-600 was a nice gift.
Without crop ?
Slight crop. From 45 mp to 26 mp.
So 600 mm still not enough to get really close :/
I have one, I'll try an find the shot I took of the Moon with it. it does affect the clarity a bit
Double it
Correct. Need more reach.
time for 800mm
👀 someone's wife would probably not so much happy about
But hey
Moon photos
bruh
Sad part is 5.6
This plus an R7 (APS-C) would be 1800mm effective
wdym a lens the cost of a small sedan isn't affordable?
lol
Well, for US people
Me multiply that by 6-7
I could get close to a nice car
But car don't take photos
Or even better, buy a piece of land a build a house
Moon, 500mm lens with doubler thing I cannto recall the name of
Actual camera vs Samsung
Discord compression is so bad. 😂😂😂
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ETRHECQtPA8TM2CPA
Uncompressed version.
My phone uses AI to make it look better 
I know, but also, … better is very subjective here. Even the smallest zoom, compression has the moon fall apart into pixels rapidly.
sounds like you need to stitch together a few thousand shots of the moon
I can try the Z8 pixel shift mode and stack 32 images to make 148 mp photo.
i thought you had a z9
Nope. Just z8. I don’t need the giant ass z9. The z8 has pixel shift z9 doesn’t. Z8/9 AF the same. Both get 20 fps uncompressed raw or 120fps compressed jpeg. Z9 battery is larger. Only real advantage and has the double grip for comfort shooting in landscape and portrait.
Oh and z9 both card slots are CFexpress. Not one CF and one SD like the rest of the lineup. I wish they were the same on the z8 too for matched speed. Don’t need sd slowing down fast shooting.
They are. I love all the colors and retro feel. I also love that the zf is essentially a z8.
I like the orange on the zfc
They used to have an orange on the zfc I guess now it’s just on the zf. Weird.
They have a lot less colors on the zfc now than when it launched.
nice
samsung telephotos are really good
but they could have a more open tele
how that works ?
z5 >>>
so is made of cheese
Retro is in rn
rn?
Eh, I think it's a timeless look
The zfc is like the z50 the zf is like a baby z8. Nice AF but not as good at speed or sensor size.
nah i mean the pixel shift
It's nice that zf is FF
Oh. It’s sort of like stacking images but it shifts the actual sensor to get more detail. You can do 4-8-16-32 photos and use Nikons editing software to stack the images, making the photo a max of 180 ish mp from stacked 45 mp photos.
nice
i will see if my z5 have that
It doesn’t. Not even the z9 has it. Just the z8 and the zf does up to 90 mp
I haven’t had a need to use it yet.
i wander what would happen if you try to take photos from stars[
with the sensor moving
I think much like the stacked images, you want everything to line up as much as possible.
I’m sure YT has videos though.
Chuckles in retro camera 
I’m out of the house right meow
Oh cool!
👀SUMMONED
I can’t get good pics of mine tho, at least without doing a mirror selfie
iPhone 15 pro
@feral vector 270€ equivalent
for an F1? Not bad
I am considering picking up this lot
Yeah the F1 is pretty good with all is features, really feels modern except for the battery situation
@feral vector I’m pretty much convinced
Got to hold R50
It’s so nice
And mmmm stabilization
Also that autofocus is niiiiice
You gonna get R50 kit from MC whenever it's on sale?
I think I’ll end up getting it from camera shop
Mc has it at MSRP and can save like $150 at camera place
Also I talked to the used equipment guys, $415 for a lightly used R50
Shipping to store soon
So I’ll go look at it
Not bad
Mhm, as long as it works
I also got recommended the R50, they said the only difference was the non-touch screen and that it can’t flip out(?)
I know that’s the case but I wonder if it’s the only difference
Ack I really do kinda want to be on a newer platform but LENSES ARE SO EXPENSIVE
That's the trade off
You can get an adapter and use EF/EF-S lenses if you wanna save a buck
But keep in mind the adapter ain't cheap
So you'd either have to be buying a few lenses used for it to work out in your favor or some high end ones
nice
why mine costs like 400 dolars T_T
;-
Soft box made of styrofoam/wood/broken monitor diffusers
Not horrible results for first try
Especially since it’s color
Is this iPhone or did you buy something
notbad
just becarefull with foan + ligh
depends on the light you may get fire
What can two renowned wildlife photographers create with the same lens?
#NikonAmbassadors @ronmagillwildlife (US) & @michellevalbergphotography (Canada) put the NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S lens to the test, showcasing their unique perspectives and capturing the action in stunning detail.
Want to add your take? Tag us in your wildlife photos & vid...
814
Could be a 5.3 lens or faster
iPhone
15 pro set to proraw
Raw max
Whatever
Uncooked pictures
Online colorizer
What is an online colorizer
BW to color with ““ai””
Also we have a real softbox
Ignore the orange it’s not really there
I never liked how iPhone raw looked. Its so pixelated and it really shows how small the sensor is, and how good the software is to make it almost entierly unnoticable.
I’m just using it because it does the full 48mp
Was hoping to get some more resolution
Samsung is the same
That's why Samsung has the best cameras for a phone
😂 I love how one says samsung is the same and the next says thats why samsung the best.
I personally cant stand samsung phones. I was a pixel user for years. LOVED pixel and the cameras, but the pixel 6 pro was such trash I jumped ship. Android wasnt doing it for me any more.
All phone sensors are tiny
Minus that one with a 1”
Real camera over phone camera almost always
For quality
Well, even the 1" is small next to an actual sensor.
True. Much closer than other sensors.
Pixel is Google tho 
Yes its android but its not a Samsung phone
Someone have a material about how a telescopic works ?
Sony have full frame
Could be better
Now with that IA stuff
Better camera sensors is probably not going happening
Which is sad
I'm think of my next phone be a sony xperia ( if they put a 2k screen )
Since it still even have the headphone jack ( which I love )
Idk but I think asus have a better camera when comes to zoom
Since they made a zoom especific designed for that
Called zenfone zoom
https://youtu.be/58MZwPYa0GY?si=PEkNIiZdMWWIOlnQ well 8 years ago
How far would you go to get a fantastic shot? Well, David Sandberg, director of Kung Fury, got the shots to come to him with the power of the #ASUS #ZenFoneZoom. Here’s how he did it.
Sadly this type of phone, probably don't sell much around here so end up with the same phone from the bigger brands
Well I was foled by my memory
The zoom is 3x
I know. But I’m old. I’ve probably owned more Samsung phones than years old you are. /s. But seriously, never liked Samsung, and with HTC out of the game, there was no other brand on android I cared to go to. So I went to iPhone.
2k=2.5x 1080p
what the
no!
2K IS 1080
same thing!
because its in terms of scaling
4K is 4x 1080
8K is 4x 4K
2.5K is 1440, 1440 is NOT 2k
(2560)
5k is 4x 1440
720 is 1/4 1440
etc
This is true. More says 2k became popular after 4k branding since there didn’t seem to be anything between 1080 and 4k so people called 1440 2k even though that’s wrong.
XD
about why 2k, is just because idk
for a flagship 1080p seems to little
I have a 1440p screen on my phone
most phones are
i know
and honestly its fine
at the point when you could tell the difference i feel like the phone is to large
hehe
iPhones have weird resolutions on their screen
iPhone 15PM has a screen resolution of 2796x1290
What the hell resolution is that supposed to be
anti repairability?
They go for PPI over an exact resolution
Retina
Apple could do a 1440p class display, which would be plenty of pixels for retina and then a little extra, but they want retina
And due to the volume of displays apple commands from suppliers, theres no issues getting the custom resolution made
Sony has the phone for you
But 1080p +, idk
We had true UHD 9 years ago
Oh God it's a snapdragon 810 device
Literal pocket heater
@deft garden what is being your experience with the 180-600 so far?
Its super heavy. Good reach but you still want more, its easy to not get a sharp image if youre not careful.
aaaaaa
what about the 24-200
oh forget it
i get that with my phone
im starting to think if i really wants that lens
to shoot birds
the moon shot, i was holping more reach
I hated this lens. I'd take 180-600 over 24-200 any day. While its easy to mess up a shot, its much harder to get a good shot with the 24-200. You legit always have to be at f8-11 with that 24-200 lens and damn is it not sharp at 200 at all.
No, the 180-600 is really good, esp for the price. I was expecting a lot of soft images like I had on the 24-200.
180-600 worth it, awesome lens.
24-200. I didnt like it at all, super soft images.
dont scare me like that
what about this one
28-400
oh
not that good
nice range
but not that good
Dont have first hand use with that one.
Nikon 28-400mm lens vs Nikon 24-200mm lens. How does the Nikon Z 28-400mm lens compare to the Nikon Z 24-200mm lens? In this video we compare the image quality of these two lenses with some side by side landscape photography images taken with the 45MP Nikon Z7II. I examine the images in Lightroom and give my thoughts on how the lenses perform. I...
I don't know how light room process the raw files
But bunch of the images looks the same
Taking side the mm difference
The 28-400 looks darker in all the images I saw in the video.
Uhm
Curious
@deft garden do you think the z5 can handle the 180-600 or to slow camera?
And can ubput some raw samples in a drive and share with me ?
Sorry for all questions is that the price is really big so I'm trying to convince myself hehe
should be fine. Just dont expect good FPS with birds.
I don't, but I got nice results even with low fps :/
Yeah if you don’t plan to burst shoot you’ll be fine. The AF is decently fast on it.
can u share some photos
Idk
I’m between Nikon canon dslr and mirrorless and not sure what price either
I know, useless
canon have a more cheap lenses than nikon i think
but i like nikon idk
since ley look more well build than all
sony is a amazing camera, but looks like a toy
just added up I’ve spent $650 on SLR stuff 💀
since April
On a camera that was “ free”
dont much
i think @deft garden knows mmore
i have the spesc where
Vá mais além do smartphone e concretize as suas ideias de vlogging com um novo nível de qualidade de imagem para fazer brilhar os seus conteúdos. Pequena, capaz e extremamente simples de utilizar, a Z 30 amplia os seus horizontes para criar com mais luz, mais capacidade e mais versatilidade. Esta câmara mirrorless foi concebida para os criadores...
you should just bought a dslr at that time
Yeah lol
nice specs for simple camera
but no view finder
Film is fun tho
and 1/4000 not that fast shutter speed
1/4000 very fast
your phone probably have a faster shutter
Currently 1000
phone or camera?
cause well
if you compare with your film stuff
yeah
since your film stuff is older
hehe
My film camera does 1/8000
ooh fancypants rich McGee over here
(Family friendly words that won’t get me banned)
Could say fork you
I’m gonna change it up a bit because I think I know what I need, roughly
•under $1000 including 7% tax
•digital
•2 lenses or more, one portrait/general whatever, one 300mm-ish equivalent telephoto
•good enough autofocus
•new or used don’t care, long as it’s decent
what yall think of that
I don’t think it’s doable with R50
As much as I’d love it
I can always get new lenses later of course
EF lenses are a lot cheaper but the adapter is like $200 on its own
Honestly
mirrorless is a LOT
what IF I go dslr?
are they really that bad?
im gonna earn precisely $0 for pictures, its just for fun
aaaah
idk
dunnoooo
so many things
i mean- wow- spent $650 total, including film, on SLR, and I have 28mm, 50mm, 35-70, 70-200 macro, 300mm, and 2x teleconverter
yeah its 40y old but its good
I just want digital so the cost per shot goes down instead of up
and for better quality
because film is cool and all but you certainly get better quality from digital
I would go for a used Rebel but 9 AF points isnt it for me
thats way too few
maybe I get R100 but then that one seems to just be a rebrand
I really just need to save up about $1000, then go in and dedicate an hour or two to talking to camera sales people
They're not bad
But newer cameras, ie mirrorless, are gonna be more capable
Look into the later DSLRs
Get something a bit higher end than a rebel
Maybe a 90D
What exactly is 'more capable'
(sorry for constantly bothering yall about it I just dont wanna waste money... I feel like im pacing here haha)
Better sensors and processing, better AF
I just need to buy something to figure out how much that means to me
I don’t want to do a ton of post processing
Lightroom is life
Unfortunately there isn't a great alternative to Lightroom
Apple photos comes close, but it's much more limited
There are good photo editing alternatives of course
But Lightroom photo library management is why I use it
Good products made by a Scumpany
Like Microsoft and Google and Nvidia and Apple and… hey wait isn’t it all or most of them
https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/
if i were looking to buy some software, I'd probably get affinity photo
good pricing
dogo
gimp
no is not
just check about how many auto focus points etc have
Gimp is
a) not remotely the same as Lightroom. It's technically a Photoshop competition. Lightroom offers image editing and library management.
b) shit. More of a MS paint competitor lol
Adobe, deservedly, has a lot wrong with it.
The products are way too expensive for individuals.
The pricing plans are predatory.
And the software stability can be pretty lackluster at times.
But they make really good products
Apple photos on a Mac gets pretty close to Lightroom and is free, but unfortunately it's an apple platform exclusive
Nah gimp is god
Better than all >
Gimp free
Gimp open source
Gimp good
Free and open source do not mean it is good software
And Gimp don't use your stuff to train IA stuff
Gimp good
With darktable
For raw
Good morals is not the same as good and usable software
Gimp have plug-ins
You can build your stuff
Hehehe
Taking stress @feral vector out of equation, true light room is better
But I still prefer the older ones
Like buy one time and is yours
Ia is nice, but meh for me, no much of use
Again, Adobe has predatory pricing
Or nothing that my phone don't do
It fuckin sucks
Oh
@jagged lake you could try hackintosh for apple photos
Harder to make now that Mac doesn’t tend to even support intel stuff any more.
But I agree with you. Adobe sort of has us by the throat with how good LR and PS is.
If we avoided all predatory companies with bad business practices, there would be nothing to buy.
While I haven't tested the new Apple photos features yet, I used it for a while on high Sierra and Mojave and it was pretty good for free software
I’ve only used photos on iOS. I didn’t even know photos on Mac was more like LR etc. does it only do JPEG/HEIF or raw?
Although if apple photos was the goal, a second hand M1/2 Mac mini with external SSD would work fine
Admittedly: I edit on my Mac and then upload to google photos. 😂
It does raw
Huh. Interesting.
It doesn't understand Samsung raw format annoyingly, but it handled alpha raw fine and I assume canon raw and Nikon raw
I converted all my Samsung raws to dng and Apple photos worked with that
These operating systems include system-level support for RAW images taken by many third-party cameras.
I could
They list Samsung, but not the camera I had
So either Samsung raw support came after I switched to Lightroom, or it somehow didn't like the .srw from my old mirrorless
I also have a 2010 iMac but it’s only running high sierra
Just watched a dude with Fuji film edit in Apple photos. It has the core functions, bust sadly no masks and I mask a lot of the time. Won’t work for my user case sadly.
Old
But you could build a hackintosh box
Don't you have a lot of 2010s era spare parts sitting around now?
I have so much
I’ve thought about doing hackintosh
No idea how though
Shouldn’t be too terribly hard
Start with high sierra
Or Mojave
I think Mojave should be doable without much trouble, but you need Radeon or Intel graphics
High Sierra was end of Nvidia web driver support

Intel cpu/amd GPU you can get pretty decently new. I think even sequoia. Just no AI features.
i use the editor from nikon
honestly
dont think need more than that
if i need layers gimp does the job
sad part is just no raw image with layers
but do what
I have that installed but never tried it. But it’s required to stack for pixel shift shooting.
this was edit
I mean I could do 12600KF/6700XT, both are unused rn
Just dunno about driver support
Hey @deft garden do you have some public photos with the 180 on a Google drive or photo ?
Nothing more than I shared here. Trying to see uncompressed?
Or specifically at 180mm on the 180-600?
Sorry compulsive habit when I see planes.
DFW airport?
Dtw
Yup she could be in there now for all I know. 😂
Yeap
Thanks
the first one
i image what a amazing image even with zoom
that would be if the 180 was like 2.8-4.0
but that would probably made the lens a chucky boy
please is a amazing photo, but i do notice some noise in shadows
after zoom alot
Yep, although some of the newer releases might be a bit trickier to get working
Rdna2 should work
But I don't know what 12th gen would do since apple never used Intel hybrid core designs.
If you disabled the E cores it would probably work fine.
exactly what I am worried about
I know they used 6800s so thats fne
fine
also Carter- 75-300 or 100-400 RF?

