#A function to make stockfish play the best move (more precision, less elo)

9 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

humble jasper
#

Beware that "increase perfect play at the expense of losing some Elo" doesn't mean anything

#

Stockfish search parameters are already massively tuned, and the games played for tuning begin from positions whose evaluation is about 1, so I doubt doing less pruning there would work

#

And the idea 2), simply isn't compatible with an alpha beta pruning framework

#

Stockfish already does its best at sorting moves from best to worst, and adjusting depth depending on how good the move looks

#

Assuming I got what you wanted to say, because point 2 is really really ambiguous.
(eval difference between what?)

golden iron
#

for you, perfect play means fastest mate?

#

in this case sf is not optimal indeed. The idea of an engine that converts a winning position as fast as possible seems interesting

#

but stockfish's aim is to be as strong as possible, so i don't think that work will be done to improve "conversion speed"

#

i wonder if there are engines that do this though