#pc-build-help-and-tech-talk
1 messages · Page 142 of 1
Oh, then you're gonna want more USB ports.
Unless you have some in the front of your case.
I only utilize 3 slots. 4th is for a phone cable lol. I got headset, mouse, keyboard. Not a super gamer so.not sure what else I could utilize
I mean, if you ever decide to upgrade to a higher-quality microphone.
Some of those use USB.
Network adapters, bluetooth adapters...
Come to think of it I've only used 3 ports on motherboard the whole time. Only used 4th on front case usb
Which I think my.case comes with at least 1
I use ethernet only for network. Never cared for bluetooth...not sure what I'd even connect with that. So I suppose yeah I'm fine with the USB
Having more is probably better than not enough
I have no idea which MBs to pick from though.
Definitely want quality to last me 5-7 yeare like my z170 has
Like I said, for you, it depends on features, but more important are slots and memory support.
Which I think I got what I need for it right?
This is the hardest part about building a pc haha
Getting the right thing. My computer has been ran super hard for nearly 6 years. But my mistake was a i5 6600k instead of an i7. And 970...which was bad. Got a 2070 replacement. But the computer is still super good but being handed off to my gf. She wont do much but I havent struggled much with it anyway. I find myself playing CPU intensive games a lot and get bottle necked cause i5 and 2133 ram
Are you planning on using the PC for video editing or rendering of any kind?
Nope
Okay. Just wanna make sure you don't have any post-build regrets. LOL
I clip videos from nvidia but that's it
Although, you might as well go for an i9 if you want a beefy gaming rig.
I'm not a creative content creator by any means nor would I try
Idk i9 is a little ridiculous
Be hard pressed finding a game needing a i9
It'll futureproof you though.
Eh I'm convinced i7 will hold me over
If an i5 can do it for 6 years with still not that much issue
I7 should be fine
I mean I'll eventually have to replace my old computer my gf has
I can make the call then
The other thing is that you'll have to get yet another motherboard if you find that the 9700k is bottlenecking.
An i7, especially 9th gen, shouldn't struggle for 6 years at leeeasttt
Like I'm still playing any game I want with an i5 6600k
I just cant run a bunch of extra programe
*laughs in AMD*
I hear amd is nice for the multi threading piece. But intel does have the better single core that .most games only use
And is only $10 more than the equivalent
Yeah, but games are starting to take advantage of more cores.
The only current advantage Intel has over AMD are turbo clock speeds.
Other than that, Intel has serious temperature issues.
Well like its hardly cheaper anymore. Like the ryzen 7 3900x is sitting at 289 and my current selected intel at 299.
And I heard vise versa on temps. AMD also being more ram hoggy as well
Honestly, at first I thought AMD had bad temps, but I think it was just with older models.
I can run instenive games with a 4.2 OC i5 and a cooler master at around 50 Celsius
No big deal
I still have my i7 6700k. LOL
My old 970 wouldnt regulate itself and thought 75 celcius was ok
😬
I had to manually run fans and super high speeds to keep it to like 55 or 60 lol
Got a 2070 and I feel kinda scammed now with the 30xx series

I think part of the reason why my temps are higher is because I live in the state with the shittiest climate.
Yeah, the new GPUs literally just released.
I bought 2070 a year ago but like still
What a fuckin leap
3070 > 2080ti
???
A 500-600 gpu is now going to outshine a 1400 one

Anyway. Tangent. My goal is to figure out what god damn motherboard to get
And hope my ram is - gud nuff -
To be fair, the 2000 series was pretty mediocre to begin with.
Hell it was a leap from the 970
Yeah, but not so much from the 1000 series.
Meh. Love my rog strix 2070. It will be fine years to come. No big deal. I dont care for 4k and shit anyway
Its in its infantile stages still
Once it's a standard I'd probably get the upgrades
What kind of monitor do you have?
Almost nobody does 4K gaming.
It's more about high refresh rates now.
Mainly because screen tearing is slightly less visible in higher framerates.
1440p 144hz is probably the best budget monitor you can get.
Depends on your budget
I mean, they aren't crazy expensive anymore compared to earlier when it was very new
I have a acer raptor g sync .monitor. 144hz 1080p if I'm not mistaken.
Games look pretty to me
Yeah, that's similar to what I have.
But suppose I'm used to old ass TVs and ps1 and ps2 shit growing up lul
Most people think 1440p is better, but most people sit 2 feet from their monitor nowadays.
Though if you have a pc that can do 90 fps at most or whatever 144hz is a waste of money for that setuo
Nah, it'll futureproof you.
I pull well over 144 frames in plenty of games aside from unoptimized ones with my current 6 yr old PC but with 1year old 2070
But idk I suppose having more pixels CAN be nice but I'm near blind as a bat anyway
Do you think bats can see colour waves?
Still dont think 1080p is bad or not worth it
1080 is great
Lot of games dont even support the 2k or 4k stuff well yet
So like I said I'd upgrade when the base meta for games shift to requiring or needing it
Yeah, I upgraded from 1080p 60hz to 1080p 144hz (with Freesync).
I'm going to upgrade my cpu first
Hmm
Just stuck on a mobo
Imagine being loved lmfao


https://pcpartpicker.com/list/k39qDx
What I got so far.
I just picked a case that I thought was -okay- for its cost.
Need more opinions or options for mobo
Maybe ram too. I figure 3200 is fine... I hope
3200 is sufficient enough.
Cpu or ram 3200
Ram
I just woke up an hour ago
I'll let it slide
||And I have braindamage||
Me too ngl
Epic
Heres my current -decent- crap
I5 was a mistake. This much I know
But have mostly been able to do what I want
Nice
I know the struggle
I too had to play on a tv for a bit
Getting the acer raptor was just.. 

Like it's maybe even a few seconds
did you guys see the 3080 vs 2080 ti video nvidia released?
numbers seems neat
Geforce RTX 3080, 169 FPS vs Geforce RTX 2080 Ti, 116 FPS,
that's 45%...
I wonder where the 3090 will land
Granted, it's their closed tests with DLSS but still
or was it?
24th for the 3090
i am still curious as to what amd willcounter with
hints give you the GPUs to be used in the consoles that are going to be released
EK FE blocks are not coming anytime soon apparently
interesting, EK said a few weeks back that they would have blocks for rtx3k at or near launch
is that specifically for FE or is that an rtx3k thing?
Me personally I'm just gonna wait even longer, and I don't doubt AMD is withholding info of something bigger than that from their partners
Cause I mean come on, if the Xbox with 52Cus; the entire system running at 300W practically around 2080 Super or better performance
There's no way their 80CU card would not obliterate a 3070, it won't even be in the same price class
If its better than 3080 by any significant margin that remains to be seen
I don't see them having something faster than the 3080 and being priced the same
It'll be more, question is how much more relative to a potential 3080 Ti that Nvidia will inevitably release
At no less than a grand imo
And people talk up the 3090, but like it only has 20% more shaders; its really only expensive cause 24gb of Vram and all that bandwidth
So it can't be more than 20% faster than the 3080, likely 15%
But what are these hopes and dreams you speak of?
I don't know what I'm bashing 
Its simple If AMD is faster price will be greater, if they're only a little bit faster they will be the same price
If they're only slightly behind it'll be cheaper
That's the reality of AMD's modern strategy
Kind of, they did price similarly to intel initially. Prices came down in a matter of weeks though
I dunno if they were testing the waters, see if they could sell the 1800X for $500 at decent numbers; I'm pretty sure that went down to sub $400 in 2 months or something
I guess technically they were offering double the cores and threads compared to intel at the time
So it made sense to have this sort of "halo" product in the stack
Not me
Master chief, you mind telling me what you're doing with that rope?
"Sir, fixing my bank account."
These memes wouldn't be around if Nvidia didn't decide they wanted to charge over a grand for a cutdown 102 
If they were truly copying intel, we would only get like 5-10% increases for like 20% more money every generation for 8 years straight
They were ballsy with Turing cause of the mining market, they thought it would last another year or two; so we got 25-30% more performance for a 70% price increase one generation
Then the 2080 which was just a gimped 1080ti for the same money
I guess that's comparable to Intel, tiny bit better while saving money and asking for the same price
I mean they have something to show for it, their marketing is solid and works really well on a layman, then now with ampere they're kind of side stepping criticism by renaming the Titan; reducing the prices over all
Well I guess the 70 is still $500 that's kind of shitty, maybe that was to cope for those 2080Ti users playing at 1080p or something. "same performance or better for 60% less money" 😱
It will be a 1080p frame slayer forever I guess 
So I guess if that's your thing, go ahead buddy
$500 isn't so bad compared to $1200
And 8gb isn't gonna last long at 4k
That'll be relegated to a 1440p card at best in 2 years
Maybe less 
Yeah I heard at like 27 - 30" screen sizes, the difference between 1440p and 4k isn't very big anyway
At least you'd be hard pressed to be able to tell the difference, and with new features sharpening textures to higher resolutions anyway
What's the point?
Unless you're using a 40" screen or something
I heard its pretty nice for doing editing and what not on a 4k monitor though
I don't know what "retina" means in this context
So if you're close enough you would be able to differentiate the pixels
Yeah I checked, would be about even with my 22" 1080p monitors
So I guess uh yeah would be worth upgrading my main one with a new gpu
If it wasn't over a grand maybe
Oh you mean with a 3070?
Yeah the bandwidth just wouldn't allow for it.
With memory compression and all that crap that Nvidia is good at; the 3080 will be just good enough for a while
Though its worth mentioning DLSS sucks up that memory from what I understand
But I dunno I'd give it this entire GPU generation before it starts showing its age at 4k I think
And the 3070 I mean just get it for 1440p 
Or 1080p if you want to destroy the frames

Damn you Google
Looks nice af tho
Sure, the trio looks better than the last one
What?
One of the places it's being sold in Canada, the 3080 Trio, is being sold by a mom and pop computer shop
They have 2
Guess they really are trying to get these fucking things out there, jesus.
Usually it's either Canada Computers or God fucking forbid Lu Computers.
But they haven't released it officially yet, this would imply they got it from Msi somehow and is breaking street date
Asking for a lawsuit 
They're not there Right not
As I mean is, they currently have 2 in coming, as in, they'll have 2 at release.
Well shit
pardon my quick writing.
But, yeah, mom and pop shop having a new card at release.
Kek
Only 2, shows the density of release for a smaller store
Only 2 for a not global/country wide company
Thats huge in 2020 tbh
That's basically 2 cards they just said "We'll take the loss" since it's not a global/nation wide company
but idk how this shop got it or what deal they struck.
They're buying for just under MSRP 
Just under? 1$CAD under I guess
Or at, I mean the Trio is probably adding $40 or $50
You pay for the name above all, and the pretty lights.
And the MSI 3 fan flex
💪 Dad bring my 2x4 my GPU is sagging again
It seems funny. Isn’t there a chip on both sides? Seems weird it’s only cooling one side
No that's not true
That was speculation gone wild
There might be certain PCBs that put memory on that back, but that's about it
15% more performance for 100% more money isn't worth it anyway 
3080 is literally just the best
3090 is just overkill but if you can afford it sure.
but it aint even size, you can adjust a case if you have some know how.
it's the fucking WEIGHT
im scared to put one of those near my PC for fear of it just snapping
3090 seems kind of unnecessary for it’s a literal Titan GPU
Yeah right. It’ll never drop down
Better off getting a 3080 for much better price for better performance than 2080 Ti
I imagine they would be about 300$ by the time RTX 3000 releases
I’ll have to think if it’s really worth considering an upgrade now as o have a 2070 Super
I have other things I consider more important for the moment however. Like a monitor as well as a case and some fans
Imo Turing isn't worth it anymore unless you getting a 2080 Ti for sub $400
If I can get 2 of them for under 800 I will, but if I can't, well If I'm being honest here. I wanna see what else is coming
The 3080 meets everything I wanted and more and the price blew me out of the water, but AMD always has something at least nice.
My dad and I got talking a few days ago and he wants to go all in on a gaming room.
So like a 2 in 1 PC?
Wants to more or less make the basement into a game/tv/rec zone but also wants to go nuts with the PC's
Kinda, sorta, not really.
So 2 cards for 2 Pcs?
More so we wants to get 2 PC's the same, or sorta the same, but he also wants the room to be a "Brand match"
2 cards for 2pcs
But, this is why I'm up for it
Brand Match 
He'll pay half for my PC
Brand match as in he wants to get all MSI, or all ROG, Ectra products
To try and keep the same flow, or get none at all.
He's one of those people
and it rubs off on me, a lot.
My rig is gonna be cheap so I don't mind.
But he runs his own company, so.
You’ll have to be finding a 2080 Ti for under 3070 price if you can. Otherwise the 3070 really is the best you could get for that or more
He has a lot of disposable income to blow and this is his latest passion project.
I told him to wait, see what else comes around before going big.
But the Canadian market is at a decent high atm thanks to the USD vs CAD
70 cents to the american dollar, we were almost 40 for awhile.
Oh man that sounds rough
Mhm
I didn't know it got that bad
It did, for a few months.
But because people aren't buying from America, we shot up hard to 70 cents
Its 77 cents atm
We're literally on par for what the USD is worth in GBP
So, when I say a product like a 2 2080tis isn't that crazy it's cus at one point
Those fuckers were almost 2200$ in Canada plus tax.
A piece.
Seeing things get this affordable almost overnight is amazing.
And just that, other products from the US, too.
And no prices are being changed to counter it, so our base Canadian prices are fine.
Yeah it’d make sense. But now you’ll have to see whether the 2080 Ti will make it lower or it’ll keep on the stupid high price
So we're not even paying a premium anymore.
Knowing how liberal and how rich most people here are.
I can go to any computer hand me down store and probably find a 2080 TI
Would have to go into the used market for the best value pretty much
Cus someone wanted to get rid of it ASAP to get a 3070 or 80
Because I don’t think they’re going to get any cheaper than the slresdy are
Yeah, or a flea market.
Yeah the used market could work tbh
I have a few part swap places around me, some well known others not so much.
I like going for flare, sometimes. It's why I like buying brand stuff
But getting it cheap makes me far happier
I see people asking $450 for 2080Tis, not listing them for that much but I mean the comments are offering that much 
And the nearest fleamarket near me recently closed for good.
On uh Ebay
30 years and it's done now, sad days.
900$ for 2 2080 Ti's is a dream
But, in the end, I wanna see what AMD brings up
But I don't wanna let this deal pass
AMD was going for ray tracing this time around, so maybe it’ll prove to be better
It very well could, or, it's going to be affordable and enjoyable.
Well listen to what was said earlier this year
I'll take affordability and good ol AMD over a 2080 if they come up near equal
Lisa literally said "We will have a Halo product in the GPU space, and we will be disrupting the 4k gaming market."
Mmmmm.
Anything thinking that they're only barely competing with a 3070 is blatantly ignoring that statement
It's going to try and fight the 3090.
But it may end up being just a step above a 3080
Or it could rocket past all of them.
Yeah they could have done it pretty well this time around. But again I’m not exactly sure just how good they’ll be yet
It'll try and fall short, but I mean at best the 3090 is 20% faster on average than the 3080 just going by the fact that it has 20% more shaders
My best guess, from my experience with old AMD and the trends. They're going to come out fighting, and swinging as they always fal- yup
Fall sort.
Those guys have leaked way less than NVIDIA
That's assuming it scales evenly, so 15% might be more accurate
But, in the end, the AMD product is gonna last longer :^)
Even if they don’t compete against the 3090 they still have the hand in price to performance
Maybe they'll keep the trend and make the price lower and we see a return to old price styles.
Knowing the 2080 Ti was a great choice for 4K, no doubt a 3080 will be too
Well define compete against the 3090, cause let's say they get within 10%, would that be competing with the 3090 or just overshadowing the 3080
Did you see the 3080 vs 2080ti stuff NVIDIA showed?
I see ludvig
There will be a 3080 Ti as response
So even if they aren’t going past 3090, they’re just going to keep up with the low price high performance style they’ve done quite a while
Testing at 1080p?
We’ll really see for ourselves when the reviewers get hands on like GamersNexus
Mhm
But why though
I don't care if its ultra, its 1080p. We're talking about memory busses that can handle 4k no problem
It’s the % in tests I’m interested in the most, if they’re all at the same it’s good numbers imo
Ah okay it shows 4k as well
Ye
So in Modern Warfare its 33% faster at 4k
Fortnite in 4k omg
Will be super interesting to see how 3090 compares to that as well
For now, I think it won’t be a good idea listening to NVIDIA about performance. GamersNexus and the others will really show how good it is because I think NVIDIA just going to be like, shitting on us a bit on the performance
Pft I want minecraft in 8k resolution 210+ FPS
Add 15% 
Its 50% faster at Modern Warfare apparently
Ofc you have to take NVIDIAs words with a bit of salt,
But still damn Impressive cards
Much more impressive than the 2000 series was to the 1000 series.
Back from Doom and shit
I'll call them impressive when they refresh it and shrink the node so it isn't consuming 400W 
I never in my life as a kid thought I would live to see what I see now.
I thought I would be playing polygon doom clones till I was 30
then quake came out
Can’t see AMD even coming close with anything with GPU related at least.
But I’m pumped for more cpus
AMD CPU is going to be great, but I wanna believe in AMD
I have faith
It really was.
Not at lazy as intel tho
They weren't Lazy, they were greedy
^
I was about to say
Greedy
They got complacent because they dominated the market.
So they basically said "We can do whatever, fuck it."
Now Nvidia is on their heels since AMD is starting to rise up.
and we kinda had to accept it, till we didn't.
Well kind of that, and the mining boom they anticipated to continue
Lazy/greedy,
They lost the consumer first attitude
Thanks BTC for making GPU companies drop prices
If they ever had it 😅
Every company so far has lost the consumer first attitude
Yeah the reason I think the 3080 is such a big lift is cause they know AMD has something decent
Now it's the stock holder/share holder first attitude
It is
They could have easily slapped a Ti on it and put it to $1000 with 12gb of Vram
But it’s a good time to be a hardware geek
Yeah the reason I think the 3080 is such a big lift is cause they know AMD has something decent
Or they're afraid AMD has something up their sleeve.
So I’m happy
because in the end share holders and stock holders need to stop having so much share in company ideas
thankfully we're all learning
and getting better
I dunno if I would say Afraid
NVIDIA gpu department is not worried about AMD 😅
its gonna hurt
At least not my contacts 😂
Who are your contacts though AIBs?
I mean, it's not like Nvidia has spies at AMD, so nobody can say for sure that Nvidia knows AMD has something decent.
gonna rock star wars squadrons in 4k tho
AIBs didn't even know that the shader count would be doubled
Been dying for a Xwing vs Tie Fighter return.
I’d be VEEERYYY surprised if AMD had anything close to even the 3070 tbh
I mean hopefully I’m wrong
But still
Hold on though
Well I can promise you there's at least a 3070 killer with twice the Vram, that's what the AIBs know
If their improvement in GPUs takes a similar turn to their CPUs, they might have a shot.
Just how well can it run minesweeper though?
Ryzen 9 is a lovely CPU
The Xbox Series X is doing 2080 Super performance with a underclocked CPU and a total system Watt limit of 300W
That's 52Cus
What r9? 👀
Ryzen 9 3900XT
I didn’t love the 5700xt tho
Remove the power limits, cpu clock limits and clock the gpu to over 2Ghz
At least the Xbox Series X is getting better specs than the PS5.
Poor 5700XT
Or whatever it was called
It tried
my dad said i should have got the 3950X
That's beating the 2080Ti on paper anyway
but lol 1000$
They 5700XT isn't that bad... Anymore...
The PS5 is clocking higher, so it might not matter as much as you think
I've been told it's fantastic
No it isn't? @vapid crypt
Just needs to be cooled
12 cores vs 16 cores doesn’t really seem so much tbh Derri
It is, its clocking 500Mhz higher
And, honestly, I need a new case.
Thinking im gonna get a big box on wheels.
And roll that bitch around
It was hardly on par with the 1080, the 5700 that us
The GPU might have less CUs, but the clockspeed will make up for it. I'm not saying they'll perform the same but you know
Like I don’t think you’re going to expect crazy performance out of a 4 core difference unlike if it was a smaller core count
Where are you seeing the PS5 having higher clock speeds, @vapid crypt?
Because that price just doesn’t justify it
What's his name Mark Cerny?
Console wise, I find it hard just looking at the specs tbh
They revealed the clock speed of the GPU to be 2.23Ghz
The Xbox is clocking around 1.8
Oh, you're talking about GPU.
Yeah the CPUs should be clocked the same
This generation, the Xbox was clearly the better performing machine,
Didn’t stop the ps4 from owning it 🤷🏻♂️
Well it owned it because of actually having exclusives 
^
And better looking games 🤷🏻♂️
People are saying Microsoft wants to move away from console gaming.
The only decent MS exclusive is Halo, but that's on PC now.
They sort of are, they're making Xbox a gaming brand not exclusively a console brand
And then they have Forza Horizon, for whatever reason.
But having the right games are a huge part of making a console tho, so creds to Sony
I mean, last of us 2 looked better then anything I’ve seen on the Xbox
Narrative driven games with a ton of budget tend to look great
The only other drawback to the PS5 is, unlike the Series X, not many previous generation titles will be backwards compatible.
Since most of their budget is high poly models.
So far from those benchmark videos I'm getting 3080 is 30% faster and 3090 is 50% faster than the 2080Ti respectively. So how about that it scales well
20%
Still a better looking game then anything I’ve seen on the Xbox, doesn’t really change anything 🤷🏻♂️
Wait, what's 20%?
The difference between the 3080 and 3090
Oh.
Pretty much exactly what I expected
Didn’t you guys just say the 3080 performanced between 30 and 50% better then the 2080ti?
Performed *
No I said the 3090 performed about 50% faster than the 2080Ti
No I'm looking at these benchmark videos here
And they had the 3090?
Shows framerate, using a percent calculator its averaging out to about that
Thought they only had the 3080
Ah I missed the last video posted
Interesting
Will take a lookie
Now they didn't compare the 3080 and 3090, I'm just assuming based on the 2080Ti comparison
And it makes sense since the 3090 has 20% more shaders
Yeah ok that makes sense
And I’m with you there
Could be something that effects it more tho, so will be interesting seeing the techtubers deep dives
Ah so with AC odyssey the 3090 is 74% faster than the 2080 Ti at 4k 
That MarkPC claiming to have 3090 tests.
Never heard of the guy are they legit?
That's a percentage difference I like to see.
Couldn't say
Hmm he did make one comparing the 3080 and 3090 actually https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cApmTswEXjQ
Again just wait for reviewers. I don’t think the numbers are even close to being what it really is tbh
Has Nvidia mentioned a GPU that surpasses the 3000 series but costs like $2,000?
No not yet, but its possible
Nah
Naw
Its possible they'll have one with double the Vram of the 3090 running at a slower speed for like 3k
3k?
Maybe they’ll release a Quadro 9000 but that’ll probably not happen until a few more lineups
2000 feels like an awkward price point,
What a weird resolution.
3k money 
If they do another titan I’m guessing I’d be a lot more expensive then 2
In other words, double the ram double the money
Wasn't the Titan like $2000-$4000?
It was 2500
Like when there was the possibility for more cores when reviewing the Ryzen 3000 lineup?
I still want to build a 3990 rig 😂
You know what thinking about it those videos might not be real 
A 3990 with a RTX 3090.
Just wait for 4900X smh
Kek
Yeah, clickbait.
Always better to just wait for reviewers like GamersNexus anyway
It seems like they were doing real benchmarks before, and are just capitalizing on hype by faking benchmarks
What else could it even be anyways
I still believe that the 3080 and 3090 would be about 15 - 20% apart though, just based on the shader count
Yeah I mean I wouldn’t get a 3990 now 😅
Literally any benchmark by NVIDIA or anyone else before the release of anything is a literal fake about 90% of the time imo
I wouldn't call Nvidia's benchmarks fake, but I would say they're certainly picking the best case scenarios
I can see Nvidia exaggerating their benchmarks a little though.
who woulda thunk that
Nah, that's lame 
I will shit on AMD equally if they deserve it 
Well, yeah, as any real fan should.
shit on your own product for not meeting its expected benchmark just as much as you do another one for failing hard.
flex
Fans will turn on the companies they love in a heartbeat
Then the company will dismiss all of them.
^
This is the way.
This is the way.

Hm.
I take the Ampere pricing as acknowledging how shit Turing pricing was
Which was basically most people when they announced Turing
"YOUR PRICING IS SHIT!"
Discord nitro kek
I hope AMD get's their fucking drivers right the first time.
^

Please let me play games in peace
PELASE DONT
OH MY GOD IT CRASHED AGAIN
ROLL BACK DRIVERS NUMBER 435234
Drivers have been working well for a while
16-18 me cries
I think they figured it out
They did, recently.
End of 15 to the beginning of 18 AMD drivers were hit or miss.
They've been updating more frequently
At least I noticed that the past couple months
Things have been steady for everyone, I don't hear anyone complaining or see any more complaints about driver failings for games.
Apparently there are some, but when isn't there?
So, so far things look okay, but it was bad.
Well, it's AMD
What the fuck did you expect when you bought an AMD GPU :^)
I don't think its exclusive to AMD
Beginning of 5700XT Drivers made me cry, however AMD's GPU UI is much better then Nvidia's 1980's Control Panel Scheme.
Mostly AMD has the driver problems with games.
Rarely is it Nvidia anymore.
No I say they flip flop
I see one or two newer games get a Nvidia issue but it gets patched out quickly
AMD problems stick around the longest, I guess.
Technically you can get the drivers without Geforce experience
Yeah...
Yeah, that's it. AMD issues stick around longer, Nvidia ones are patched out faster.
I don't really read any problems anywhere else.
Probably better off to, I wonder if that's been part of the problem with AMD
Nvidia has been in the game too long to have that shit affect their Cards
They want to bundle their drivers with some extra software
AMD is making a slight come back
Nvidia has its hands in so many pockets, you mean.
Do we know anything about the power consumption for the 3000 series?
350W 320W 220W
750 is recommended PSU requirement
Which, means, go a lil higher to be safer
650 for the 3070
Yikes.
Get 800 to be okay.
my 850W should be fine still then 👀
900 to be comfortable.
Maybe, how old is it?
1000 to be safe
probably like 8 months now
Yeah.
Then yeah its fine
I think you're good.
I got a 4 year old 900 watt PSU
I think I need a more modern one, now.
I suppose better safe than sorry
With how much those new cards are demanding? Yeah.
I'd rather my rig not fry itself or explode
Nvidia is recommending using separate cables for each connector, for those models that are using multiple 8 pins
Hm.
Still looking for second opinions on my gaming build. I'm mostly unsure of the ram and motherboard choices. Interested in hearing thoughts.
Someone mentioned not enough USB ports, think it's only 3.
(I already upgraded to a 2070 a year+ ago with my current so that will be going with it)
I would question your platform choice in general, Z390 is old and you can't move up from there
I guess technically there is one upgrade the 9900K but that's where it stops
Everything else looks okay though
I mean nothing wrong with the computer - I just wouldn't buy a CPU at this given point in time
I'd wait a month or so to see what AMD is up to
^ This
After all, won’t the new GPUs need something better on the motherboard now? Considering that a 2080 Ti nearly maxed the limit of a PCIe x16 slot
Zen 3 while we don't have definite details, its gonna outperform 10th gen Intel at everything most likely
And no I don't think it maxed out Gen 3
That being said I don't know where the 3080 and 3090 sit by the regard, if they do max it out then be sure to get on Gen 4 for the next generation 
Maybe I’ll consider upgrading again since we’re having a real promising performance increase now
Nvidia are using 10th gen intel for benchmarks
So it must not be entirely relevant yet
I mean, both the 9900k and the 10900k are fine,
they are just so boring
especially the 10900
Literally same CPU Kek
Just add a couple cores and call it a day 
Rocket Lake, that is 11th Gen might be more interesting. It will be a blip and they're gonna reduce core counts, they're capping at 8
Yeah hopefully AMD will force them to evolve a bit
Alder Lake 12th gen is where they're actually gonna progress
I think they're targeting 16 cores, and they're going with a big little design, where they'll have half the CPU being essentially for background tasks
Sort of, that's a simplification; so like they'll have 8 big cores that do all the heavy lifting, and 8 smaller cores that handle smaller tasks typically background stuff
That's what leaks are saying pretty much
That’s funny. Couldn’t they do that with 12 cores? 4 for background, 8 for gaming/heavy
So something I know is that they are disabling Hyperthreading on the small cores too
So it'll be a 16 core 24 thread CPU
Although to be fair, I guess that’s quite a really nice bonus when you can have 8 cores for streaming and 8 for gaming
That’s kinda weird. How come?
That’s a brain fuckery to read right there
Oh its because their ring bus doesn't scale great past 8 cores
So splitting things up is what they're gonna do
Eh. Still isn’t that bad I guess. Not really like you’d ever need multi threading for background programs so that’s fine I guess
Why did that send 4 times? 
I feel like its worth pointing out that most systems should be able to run a high tier mainstream desktop cpu with a 3080 on a 650w psu
Just better pray for no ripple lmao
Just get a quad rail like me 
Actually I have 750W so quad rail probably wouldn't matter
Im running a heavily oced 8700k and 1080ti on a 650w evga psu
Only chugging about 450w under full load
Eh, I guess it’s fine. They’re going to go from high power consumption down to a lower amount but performance staying at a slow increase
After all, that’s what AMD did before. Not really something to worry about anyways
The use of this new 12 pin is weird though, I guess its just so they don't have to use multiple 8 pin connectors
It does do a good job of saving space on the pcb
And considering the compact PCB sizes they're going for that makes sense
Makes a lot of sense to me, just a pain in the ass given the nature of standardized modular power supplies
And the lack of standardization too, i suppose
All the connectors are the same, but the pinouts get really shitty
So that's why im asking for second opinions, ive lasted 6 years with an i5 6600k, i dont think ill have any future concerns with an i7 9700k.
But I'm more concerned with a mobo and what other options I could get
Personally, don't care for AMD anyway... they've got their own issues on both sides, but the ryzen 7 3700x, the equivalent to my selected CPU is $10 less than the intel one, to which that 10 more dollars is actually still a lot more perfomrance. so oh well, regardless, no need to debate CPU
My i5 6600k is still extremely solid as it stands right now and my GF will be taking this computer. I have mainly ran every single game on max settings no issue, running it hard everyday for all those years. I was mainly concerned with going from an i5 to an i7 to get a little more out of it/small future proofing.
Not a lot more, but sure there's slightly higher framerate at 1080p when using a high end GPU, and then generally slower at everything else
As for the motherboard it looks okay, the size of the heatsink on the power delivery is a little sus maybe? I'm not an expert personally
I guess I would say, don't get that board if you plan to drop an i9 into it in the future
i9 is excessive for my gaming IMO. I'm not going to be doing rendering, video, streaming, etcetc.
Might be excessive, might be nice to have down the line if you do need it then
like i said i5 6600k OCed to 4.2 has ran strong with minor issues
But by the time that comes up you might just get the latest stuff that's the best for the money anyway
the only struggle was truly the new Modern warefare lol
6 threads is rough now, I can't really say how long 8 has
which my 2133 ram comboed with shitty HDD and and i5 , the warzone mode struggled for a few initial games and evened out.
But that has been the only game that struggled
2133, was RAM expensive at the time you got it?
6 years ago
2015ish
let me grab my specs
This was $1500-1600 total (only it had EVGA 970)
Oh nevermind then, bad call on the speed probably
I dont remember individual costs.
RAM started going out of control in price in 2017 and stayed like that for around a year
the i5 and ram was the bad call. and 970 was garbage for temperatures.
Didn't get good til 2019
It was Ram manufacturers colluding to bring prices up or something
Your average 8gb stick of DDR4 was going for around $80+
It's a shame but like...the computer build i have together now on PC part picker is literally 1550$ with my 2070 cost included.
and look how much better it is comparatively for the same cost..
Well yeah newer hardware 
Wait, why did you have a 1280x1024 monitor?
Nice pc
i5 > i7
120 SSD > 1 tb m.2
1 tb HDD > 2 tb HDD
Are these your upgrades?
Newer (generation) + upgrade (hardware)
good ol barracuda
You're always gonna upgrade if you're getting all new hardware, so yeah redundant 
Shitty eh I mean debatable
Depends on the use case.
If we're looking at locked parts 100% true
Cause Intel is scum and they lock RAM speeds to 2666 for i5s and below
Nah not really. 10600K proves better than 10700K in gaming performance for the price
my i5 6600k has done me well to service me well for 6 years hard, and its going to continue with someone else, but it was a little bit less than i wanted.
i7s and above that are locked are locked to 2933
Cause Intel is scum and they lock RAM speeds to 2666 for i5s and below
Hello i5 user here.
this is true.
Well yeah not for The K skus though
If you have a K and a Z board then you can clock the RAM up fine
The limitation applies to anyone that got a 9400F with a B board for example
Thankfully I got an MSI Z board, so.
Or for whatever reason if you got a B board actually
Literally bypassed it all
That's pretty shitty
But before I had this board I had a really old one.
I was not as knowledge as it was my first build so thats what i ended up getting. and like i said its only struggled with one game so far, COD MW. lol
but now we upgrading
Well I heard it was a hard one to run
And plus, there’s quite a fine collection of i5 now, even the 10400 was a better choice than a 3300X or the 3600 so I’ve heard
This time around, definitely making sure i get something quality and good.
MW is fucking hard to run on even top systems.
Mhm.
Or it was the 10400F
As expected.
butttttttttt
Why not just look at 10th gen if you're adamant on Intel
cause the i7 9700k is 299
Only in warzone? Funny.
vs 400-450.
Sure, but the 10th gen i5s are objectively side grades to a 9700K
You get 6 cores and 12 threads, 8700k pretty much
You’re better off investing in a 10600K than a 9700K imo
I think I made myself clear, 10th gen i5s are a side grade to the 9th gen i7
Hence why the 9700k is 299 in the first place, it was 399 last year I think
normally like 350
320-350
amazon holiday sale brought it to 299
and ryzen 7 3700x is 289
lol
Can you find a 10600k at all?
No. As said, literal side grade = same performance
Yeah that's a side grade
Just like how the 9700K would be a side grade to the 8700k
Think of it that way, the 10600k is a cheaper 8700K
Well kind of, barely
But sure let's go with that
Quite literally, the 10600K is the best CPU out of all the 10th gen CPUs in price to performance and general gaming performance most people would have
The extra threads makes it better some might argue, and the support of 11th gen later just adds to it
Since you need to go for a Z490 board
z490s are pricey
All you really would need is a 6c 12t CPU like the 10600K. The extra 2 cores could be debatable in terms of streaming but ever since Ryzen 3000, I’ve just about never paid attention to them anymore lol
I guess it doesn't have RGB features if that's a point of concern, but I don't decide pricing Intel and the AIBs do 
Yeah that is also an Asus board like the one you had picked out; I've also seen it tested its about as good as the MSI one
And to be fair, even if the price is a little more, you can really get something good out of paying a little extra
I'm aware of investing :P
I have room
just hard to see for an i5 to be a choice over an i7 with 1 gen apart.
i guess
Well its kind of the same when they brought core counts up initially
With Kaby Lake, the i7 was 4 core 8 thread. Coffee Lake the i5s are 6 core 6 thread
Objectively side grades
Kinda like having a 2070 Super versus a 3060, but that’s quite insane of a conparison but you get the idea
like dude if an i5 6600k can be gucci for 6 years and STILL be gucci while on a 2133 mhz ram struggle bus, I dont see the 9700k or 10600k being a huge issue for the same amount of time if not more.
Or even a 2080 vs a 3060, kinda wonder just how powerful the 3060 is compared to RTX 2000
Its not a huge issue, you can get whatever you want. You wanted the second opinion, and 10th gen i5s are the perfect side grade to what you've been considering
ngl I FEEL scammed that i got a 2070 and the 3070 is just like HEY, guess what, Im better than a 2080 ti thats $1500!
When did you get your 2070?
but i dont feel a lack of performance whatsoever with a 2070 anyway so
like year+ ago
Well that's how hardware advancement really is, people don't think about that too much; and really you shouldn't
IF anything my i5 is holding my 2070 back.
But you should get the best you can at that moment provided you know there isn't something better around the corner
Ah. I’ve got mine about 2019 ish. I’m a little disappointed but I really needed a better GPU since I used a 1440p and 1060 3GB ain’t ever going to cut it
Which I mean that Zen 3 though, don't know when its coming out exactly but its in the next 2 months for sure
i had a 970 that thought 75 degrees was an okay temperature underload
which its not a horrible temp
but its vram was garbo too
That's not too bad I guess
Shit if they're willing to gimp the last 512mb, it must be crap 
my 2070 chilling at 35 regularly, and 50-55 under load without trying.
Sounds like it had an awful cooler
oh my 970 chilled at 55-60

the fans just didnt regulate. it was spinning
but not regulating.
With zero fan on idle?
My card has that setting where the fans don't spin up until it goes over 50 degrees
so wait, if i wanted a 3070 id need a new board than selected or no?
No you wouldn't
It might support PCI-e gen 4 but that doesn't mean it isn't backwards compatible with previous generations
ok. cause im planning to give my 970 to put back in this one and hand to my gf, but like, FEEL like I should just keep the 2070 in it and buy a 3070 for new computer.
970 still works good for what it is, shes not going to do a bunch of intensive games liek me anyway
but idk
my problem is im just majorly out of the loop regarding MOBO and RAM
and want to make sure I get the quality stuff this time around
lol
kek
Someone got it for an exclusive look and is using it as intended.
To be fair, that would be superior cooling
Fahrenheit isn't freedom units, our weight, length and distance measurements are Freedom units 
what other country uses F
Eh, no one really measures by Fahrenheit for PCs tbh so it’s more sense to use Celsius
I use Celcius when talking computer specs for sure.
Except for diehard Americans with guns and a MAGA hat
Britain uses both interchangeably, I think Brasil uses Fahrenheit; then again I don't know if they use metric at all
Same. Fahrenheit for weather temps is pretty easy for me
Celsius only ever is useful for PC temps
and phsyics.
It is more precise yeah, Celsius tends to be pretty simple though
0 is freezing 100 is boiling
Yeah I could probably figure out Celsius for cooking. I’d have to learn it however
Eh fuck that my oven uses Fahrenheit so why bother 
kek
If I ever find myself using an Oven with Celsius I don't have a choice
i understand gun ballistics better in meters too
and distance
for driving irl use miles.
Science just uses metric, I don't see the issue in using imperial for everyday application; that's just how it is
Makes more sense than whatever a Stone is
Yeah that's another unit for mass
the fuck lmao
Apparently its imperial, so its possible in early America it was used
I barely use the kitchen to cook. If I’m hungry or thirsty I just grab some goddamn pretzels and hummus or if I really want, just use the stove top to make ramen which only has the basic High, Medium or Low
laughs in rice cooker
Otherwise I could use the instructions.
Seems like a balanced diet
I’m lazy in cooking so I just try to avoid cooking lol
Hope your family cooks for you then
They do. Pretty much 90% of the cooked food I eat is from my brother
So, back to topic on hand - still not answered - what MB options can I look into? is ram i chosen good/worthwhile?
Its fine, you can easily save some money going for a kit that doesn't have RGB; but otherwise its fine
The speed is good, I don't think going much higher would be helpful on Intel
Speaking of did you decide to go to 10th gen or not?
suppose not...was really hoping the i7 to be the optimal choice but HEY lets make i5s equal to last gen i7s now lul.
I think it’s a good thing that an i5 is the same as last gen i7, don’t you think?
This isn't a new thing, like a 7700k is pretty much equal to a 8600k
well then its not really an i5 anymore its literally an i7, it should be labeled as i3 i7 i9 and i11 now lmao
That's not how it works
Technically the addition of i9 shafted i7s if anything
Like the 9th gen i7 should be 8 core 16 thread there shouldn't be an i9
There are specific processes to how an i3, i5, i7 and i9 should be
That's Intel changing the digit to justify a price increase
cheeky
AMD has had a lot more growing pains in terms of quality IMO, but they are for sure about to overpass INTEL, but INTEL imo, currently, still has a a small edge. That's going to change unless whatever intel has been holding on to in their reserves come out/
i5s staying 6 core 6 thread for 3 generation would be awful thinking about it, there's a reason Intel is objectively behind on Desktop because they've been dragging their foot on everything
They are a buisness at the end of the day, they make small generational improvements to keep people paid.
while deeper stuff can also be funded
Intel won’t be able to do shit unless they can manage to overcome the possibility of the next gen Ryzen gaming performance, even considering the use of hyperthreads in gaming
And really the only reason they have any edge is because their ringbus architecture has superior latency, and with their uber mature node they get insane clocks watts be damned
Not a lot now, but you’ll see an increase of it soon on
And plus, the Ryzen 3000 series are pretty similar to 9th/10th gen performance
That may change soon, the new consoles will be using 8c/16t CPUs on the Zen 2 architecture; granted clocked pretty low
Technically its an APU but whatever 
Perhaps the RAM speed will suffice for the low clock
But I have no clue as to how their specs are now. Just a small bit I know
here what ill say tho
AMD cpu is whatever
they are changing the game vs intel
GPU? LUL nvidia is where its at.
How very one sided of you
That has been fixed now.
Even if Intel and NVIDIA are good, you shouldn’t ignore the fact AMD is there and with a good price to performance. Additionally now with how their CPUs and GPUs are coming, I think we’re going to see much better things from AMD than you or anyone could possibily think.
literally just said AMD cpu is fine
AMD cpu is whatever
@tardy jackal
i said they ARE changing the game
I think that gives a different message :)
its whatever between that and intel.
I know they've struggled to compete in the graphics market for a good while now, the only place they had that was justifiable was in the sub $300 space, the last time they were extremely competitive was against Nvidia's Kepler Refresh where the 290X a card nearly half the price of the Titan was competing pretty decently against it. The 780Ti was the necessary response to it.
After that the Fury X was really the last time they were okay compared to what Nvidia had, but it was beating the 980 and kind of struggling with the 980Ti, especially since Nvidia was able to undercut in price with that
Vega was a hot mess, like in a bubble its fine; though it doesn't help that those cards were amazing at mining; hell so was Polaris
They ended up getting priced out of the market, and then the Nvidia cards got scooped up when those weren't available
AMD can do well in the GPU side of things. But I believe because they do both CPU and GPU, they aren’t going to do 100% on one thing. Intel focuses only on CPUs for the most part, keeping their gaming performance at least similar while giving out crappy images of how it performs, and NVIDIA solely focuses on GPU which they have all the time to work on the drivers and performances of their GPU
With RDNA 1 they clearly didn't have things fully worked out with the architecutre
So they didn't even attempt to try to compete at the high end, they put something out that was faster than the 2070 and left it at that. Though honestly kind of impressive considering that card was probably meant to be lower clocked and more efficient
AMD is going to learn from previous releases, and be able to eliminate that con for the next lineup
If you take a 5700XT, undervolt it and set the clocks to like 1600mhz; it'll keep like 80% of its performance while drawing like 140w or something
So they have something there, it doesn't look efficient on paper; but that's because they had to clock it really high in order to have something that beats a 2070
And yeah, I don’t think AMD was really trying to hit the best. They wanted to be involved in the 1440p market and they offered a great GPU that had better price for similar or better performance than the 2070 Super for 100$ less.
It loses out on average like 5-8% but being cheaper was the advantage
You can’t just immediately hit the best of the best. Some things take time to evolve into something better and I think AMD is really going to show it this time around.
I've seen some benchmarks of it at 4k at puts it like 20% behind the 2080Ti on average; maybe more like 25%
Not so bad considering its literally 1/3rd the price in that context, then again Its not really a great 4k card for a lot of games anyway
Not meant to be though
4K isn’t really feasible unless you have a shitload of money that you couldn’t possibly care. Which isn’t something the majority of people have. So they focus on the 1080p/1440p market and give good GPUs for that resolution with a lower price which really sets the bar for many people to invest into AMD parts.
Well I mean it does do well for lighter games you know what I mean
Although the majority still uses NVIDIA. Purely because of the drivers I guess.
Like Siege and I guess Apex would be pretty playable at 4k
Nah its not the drivers so much as it is mindshare
The drivers aren't helping either but yeah 
The market is full of people using Nvidia graphics card, people see that Nvidia has the fastest graphics card, so they just go down the stack and buy whatever card they can afford.
Without considering that there is another maker in the market
I guess so. NVIDIA and Intel just makes themselves seem so superior to AMD, which is just like a disease that’s easily contagious
You mean cocky?


