#pc-build-help-and-tech-talk
1 messages ยท Page 131 of 1
risc-v has a long long long way to go
Till then the market is invaded by chinese x86 cpus? Curious if countries will allow selling them๐
?
Good morning
There's always a price, but it depends if anyone even wants to do business with China
everyone wants to do business with china, just now they aren't allowed to
amd tried their very hardest to get around it by licensing zen to hygon in some roundabout way but even that got stopped
I do think that western countries will forbid cpu's from chinese companies. Creating backdoors in chips can be tricky to find
what chinese cpus are you talking about
I think they released some potato 8 core cpus recently
Don't Intel CPUs have a internal processor that function as some kind of backdoor?
Dont remember the brand but they have some chip companies
intel management engine baby
amd also has a similar technology in their x86 chips, platform security processor
Zhaoxin KaiXian its called
The reason why the russian government does not use intel or amd๐
Do they make their own chips and run the computers on windows XP? 
They do have their own processors. Not sure what OS they using
i will take that as source: dude trust me
That's my favorite source
I could believe Russia making their own chips, I don't care if its true but it sounds plausible at least
They do make their own chips
Talking about public institutions. Privately they can use whatever they want
Right, yeah I understood that
Since you said it was the government that doesn't use intel or amd
I mean it makes sense for them not using intel or amd, even arm
oh ho ho they even have their own isa
They use two instruction set. Why that is, no clue. Probably not much info available
Nvm the company develops two
they use their own isa, elbrus, which also has an x86 abstraction layer
And seems to perform terribad๐
looks reasonable actually
They also use SPARC but unsure if the Elbrus cpu runs it
For what they probably use it for and how much it costs to make, its probably fine
they dont seem to make sparc cpus anymore
Oh okay. Yea demonio
28nm TSMC, that's gotta be dirt cheap now
But one russian dev must have asked: can it run crysis?
Nah, they asked if it can run Stalker
That's the only thing that matters 
And I'm sure it certainly could
Good one ๐ (and good game)
Ever wanted to see a couple Russians try to vodka cool a pc to play Stalker? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSUbgzlZcZE
So i found a good deal on one monitor and i might have just pulled the trigger on it for no reason 
Acer XV273KP for 399โฌ
Let's see how i like 16:9 after years of 21:9
can anyone help with the performance of this game
most games i play on high at 60 frames
but GTFO even with all the stats on low i can get solid 60 frames
@abstract kite im not positive but part of it might be that quantity of enemies being rendered along with the consistency of it
Are you having that issue overall or just when the waves are happening
anyone here got an rx 5700xt and a 3700x or similar? i am getting 100~ frames on my box with high settings under wine, and i'm wondering what people are getting in native windows
What resolution?
1080p
I don't have similar specs, but for perspective I probably average like 80 - 90, dips to below 60 at times when enemy waves spawn with an R5 2600 and an RX 580 on Windows 10
i see i see
I donโt think theyโre too sided with anything, just not too optimized with each GPU/CPU
So itโll vary I assume
In this case its a matter of how the game performs on linux through wine
yeah, trying to see what other peeps on similar hardware are getting without having to actually install windows myself
Should run fairly better than on Windows 10 at least
LTT did a test with Win 10 vs Linux through some program for steam games, tested out both and Linux seemed to perform fairly better
it varies greatly
They didn't test GTFO though, let alone any other Unity game at least I doubt they did
but generally, vulkan games are on par under wine, whereas d3d games can take a hit
I would assume it should perform similarly
There's also uh what's that called through Steam...
proton, that is what i am using
Oh right
steam itself is actually pretty unusable in wine
I built my rig 7 years ago and run the game at max settings sticking at 100 frames until combat where it can dip to 65ish
Cpu i5 4690k
Gpu gtx 1070
If youre unsure where you gpu or cpu stands, check the usage charts in details of task manager while the game is running for anything capping out, and then refer to a higherarchy chart for parts like the one from tomshardware (i dont buy through that site. Just a reference of scale)
again this is me trying to compare running in native windows to running in proton on linux
My post was with regards to questions I have been answering for people in DMs all afternoon. Hopefully to help people when im not paying attention
i see
Its a common thing for people to come to this channel wondering how the game will run/if they can run it when there's already a channel that tells you what kind of specs you should expect for minimum optimal performance. Which would be the recommended specs pretty much
You would be surprised how many people can read system specs but wont know where their gpu or cpu stands compared to others.
Most of the time its a gpu that they think is higher than it is because of the # in the name
Sure, like thinking a GT 1030 must be faster than a GTX 970
But its not
There's probably a couple of people that initially thought that
Kek I used to think that too when I was a newbie
Yea and thats fair. Especially if you havent gotten into building computers before
Thats why i tossed the tomshardware site name out there. The higherarchy chart for gpu and for cpu are very valuable resources when youre a noob trying to see what parts to get
Does this game run on linux
PcPartpicker is also good but more well known and I use it to make sure everything speaks to eachother before i finalise
i have not encontered a single bug running it with proton on linux, but it isn't officially supported @shy mural
I pretty much go to pcpp more than I should
Sweet, thanks man fat Pete out
Well Iโve stopped now that Iโve got my 2070 Super and recently got my 3700X and 3200Mhz 32GB, I still am waiting on motherboard which arrives today or tomorrow
I still run a 7700K with 16GB 2400MHz
i got a 2666 kit that runs perfectly at 3200
At what Cas?
I got it for future proof
As its turning out, its dropped to $260
my timings are 16-18-18-38 i think
I got my RAM at 3200 with 15-17-17-36
cool cool
@fleet canopy did i already brag about getting new monitor for you too
Err no not 15 14
I found the 32GB kit for 110$, which was pretty epic considering itโs also CAS16
Kek
The only real bottleneck is my monitor
ryzen dram calc unfortunately does not work under wine and i cannot be bothered manually tweaking it
Btw thought id toss it out there.
If you are running your games on 1080p (reg high def) and you get a gpu, do not get more tha you need
Yeah that dram calculator is really useful
Might not be a bad idea to contact the guy that makes it for Linux support
I suppose it wouldn't, but you never know
Iโm still planning to get a 1440p 144hz. Iโve also had the consideration of 1080p 144-240Hz, Iโll just have to see how it goes
https://www.acer.com/ac/en/SI/content/model/UM.HX3EE.P09 Arrives thursday or friday
Nice phone
If you go with 1080p dont get a gpu stronger than a 1080 ti (no not because the numbers match >.<)
1080 Ti is such a gamer
That being said though. On sites like newegg the 1080ti is almost as much as a 2080ti right now because the 1080 tis were discontinued
I did qualify my statement but yea
I also will not buy a used computer part. Never.
I have large trust issues
I pretty much go for new always, I only buy considering the prices as well as what website like Amazon or Newegg or whatever
But yea 1080 ti is a monster. And it will max your yield for 1080p gaming forever basically
Only need to go past for ray tracing 2k and 4k
Or 1440p 144Hz
The hz can be obtained p much on any resolution thats just the refresh rate (how many fps the monitor actually displays)
But yea. 1080p is 1080ti and that r7 3700x is a safe future proof buy to last at least 7 years or so
Maybe more depending on hardware lifespan
I wonder when we have to make our own components to build a pc 
The ring is there for the engineer meme right?
1080ti is an absolute unit, and it very well may last another console generation as long as you're only doing 1080p. Though we shall see; DX 12 Ultimate might be the most prevalent API and I don't think Pascal in general will last as long as that becomes the dominant API
vulkan better become the dominant api I think I will cry if it does not
Well I would prefer that, but that really depends
Cause here's the thing, with DX 12 ultimate we're looking at the hot new innovation in graphics with real time ray tracing. Now I think its too early to care about it entirely, but its what the consoles will be using pretty much
And that will unfortunately effect PC
vulkan has supported raytracing since before dx12
early nvidia raytracing demos used vulkan, as dx12 did not yet support it
I see, still its unfortunate that it will most likely be overtaken by DirectX but you know
Microsoft is gonna Microsoft
Or Microshaft as my buddy likes to call em 
need some assistance
my laptop still has a massive cooling issue, even after cleaning the fans and applying new thermal paste
acer nitro 5 laptop
gpu temp is fine
only the cpu overheats
is undervolting safe?
Are you sure the fans are working?
Well specifically the fan for the CPU
Also SELL YOUR 2080 TI 
@terse remnant have you considered a cooling pad? You plug it in to a USB Port and sit your Laptop on it.
For a moment, I was thinking "Did he actually fucking order a 2080 Ti?"
Oh no, line us is wrong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuSJ5k1orBk
not a fan of linus but still agree with him
It's kind of ridiculous, but you're paying for like movie studio stuff, and Linus has loads of ways to have the camera work just like what Corridor showed
I don't want to sell my 2080ti ๐ฆ
Sell your 2080 ti or else 
kek
No shame in keeping it though
It's still very good anyways
But you could always sell it for a bit under MSRP, like 800-900$ and buy their 3080/3080 Ti
I'm also not really allowed to sell it
I'd have to peel off the "not for reselling" stick on them ๐
Oh? So you can't really sell a 2080 Ti?
Naw we got ours from Nvidia
Ah makes sense
so they are not retail

So you can still return it for a price, or no?
na, got as in for free
Oh yeah I remember now
cheeky buggers wanting money for free stuff
:D
"remember the cards you sent us for free? now pay me to send them back to you!"
So I've seen a website pop up on Facebook too much, I decided to research it and watch a quick video
Well hopefully you guys get free 3080 tis 
I mean, they might offer seeing they got a 2080 Ti for free as well
This guy is weird in terms of advocating for buying windows license keys that cost less than 10usd
Better than more than 30$ for a key
Its typically around $14
can tell already that 99.999% of people who selling keys for that price have a very shady business practice and the origin of that key; you better not want to know where it's from
just don't activate those keys in a corporate environment ๐
I know there has been shady key resellers like on Kinguin and stuff like that
You better not know where it is, or the illuminati will hunt you down ๐
Since they're OEM keys it pretty much leaves to the imagination how they were acquired
do you know if they are OEM keys?
Watching a video sponsored by NordVPN, which only reminds me of the video that tells me that it's pretty much a dumb thing to use at this point
Yeah they're listed as OEM
Well its like an OEM key from Microsoft right, now I don't know where these key sellers get the keys. I know it was a common thing to rip em from pre-builts and stuff like that. That's certainly a shady thing to do
And not reliable cause those keys basically deactivate, so I've heard
i don't know how windows keys are being sold for so little, but it could be due to keygenerators and maybe people who have access to volume licenses and simply steal them. If you personally buy a key for little price, i don't care. But if a youtuber is promoting this, then I get triggered. It's also dangerous to people who become entrepeneurs and start their own businesses but don't realize their pc's is full of illegal licenses
na, micrsoft most likely does not deactivate the stolen keys. customers would just get mad. and what micrsoft really does not want is those people start looking for alternative os's
So I've heard of people's keys deactivating, specifically those that were purchased from a key selling site like Kinguin
maybe, if it totally goes out of control
like one person is selling one key to tens or hundreds of users
Maybe it was a case of a single key going to multiple people
i also bought once a cheap windows key. During activation it said, i need to do the phone call to activate. in other words the key was used already (probably more than 10 times), yet ms let me activate it
so yea, selling a windows 10 pro for 75usd like those company does; is fair if it's genuine key. I assume it's pretty damn illegal if they would use keys from sites like ebay
this guy also criticized the FPS the machine can reach saying the site probably uses wrong data
but he has no factual prove that this machine does not perform as stated, just says, he has a tankier machine and higher resolution and he does not manage to get this FPS....
did you see LTS video about the windows licenses ?
yeah exactly
still grey-market keys, so more or less as much piracy as when you crack the keys
they got a bunch of comments on why they pirated keys, when they infact did the opposite, they didn't activate windows at all ๐
hmm so could those keys be generated by some tool? probably for the enduser / customer it's less of a legal issue but those who sell them surely would have trouble
I don't understand why ebay etc. are continue to allow this
chances are that some honest person is selling his windows 10 pro key that he no longer uses is... very slim
it's 99% dev-volume licenses
where they can extract more or less how many keys they want
for internal dev use
but they resell them instead
that's blatant lol. Yea I assumed it would be volume license, although not sure. I think the first digits can tell if it's a volume license or not. but maybe that was at times of windows xp
why does microsoft allow ebay etc. to sell those. I mean ebay and co. make some good money with that
yeah it's... dumb ๐
I remember part of a lot of keys was also just dead MB's.
if consoles would not exist, games on pc's today would look twice as good than they are now
Oh?
But a PC can be a console 
A console is just a PC that has some Sony/Microsoft console OS, with what you could say are PC parts if they were PC parts
sony and microsoft have a lot of money and they care a lot that computer graphics does not advance too fast, because it'll make consoles titles look like ๐ฉ
lol really?
If they wanted to do this, they'd just let it go brrrr
Because consoles are getting better in performance nonetheless
of course. you have to understand that engines like unreal or unity etc. may need to support consoles. those always lack behind in terms of performance.
Aside from them being big stupid idiots for not adding an SSD until like now or a good while ago
I don't think it's the graphics that they would worry, it'd be more-so how easy it ran
the existence of consoles will not allow graphics to advance as rapid as it would without
We got DLSS 2.0/3.0 coming in, and it looks way better while also running better than the regular DX12 or RTX
most games are made for pc AND consoles. it drastically limits the freedom of development
I wouldn't really see any reason not to keep updating graphics on the PC
we probably would have had dlss 5 years ago without consoles
We have had games looking like shit like Siege for instance, to looking better over the years
And consoles exist solely because we didn't really have a gaming PC until around 2000-2010 like a Nintendo 64 for instance
sure. i do not deny that.
I just say that consoles hinder (by purpose) development in terms of graphical advancement
We just had it back then, no reason not to continue having consoles
we can speculate yes. regardless of how popular gaming would, those features could have still been released, just not for the use case of "gaming"
Really, it's just Microsoft/Sony not really investing into things more better nowadays tbf
For instance, HDD until PS4 Pro came with SSD ( I think )
why should they, if major engine produces bow to them
not only games use graphical advancements
If they wanted better graphics being made, they should have just kept updating it on PC nonetheless
Because again, you can have a great looking game that runs very smooth without problems
I wonder why they would be doing the GPU release to console before PC in the first place
Mm, perhaps
NVIDIA still needs to take on in some markets
the advancement is purposely made slower by sony and micrsosoft and that is because consoels have a big market share
so maybe it would have been better if consoles never existed ๐
They still own the server/workstation side, like their Quadros for instance which will eventually have their RTX 3000 overcome them maybe
AMD actually can just push Sony/Microsoft to let their games look good
maybe someone made a console as PC and sold it, instead?
consoles also slow down or did game development, drastically
just recently sony and microsoft use x86 architecture
Plus, with the RTX which I am wondering if that would be widely supported at the moment with AMD's RT stuff
so why were the consoles so small? surely because it had crap hardware inside ๐
Consoles are supposed to be small
No one wants to lug around a fat box of hardware
yeah
the first console generation is also a total different scenario
i am speaking here of ms and sony and their lobby
the amount of console players was very little in the 90s
Maybe not 2010, but eventually when SFF could be done with PCs maybe
while I can't tell you what's going on the parallel universe where we have no consoles, I do not believe that consoles helped with the development of games. It may have speed it up in the early 90s but do you see an immense progress from ~2010 to 2020 in terms of graphical evolution?
2010 to 2020 improved a shit load
a good example is the newest unreal engine release. It came perfect with the announcement of the new consoles, and to what surpirse; both consoels do support! yea that's great
compare 2000 to 2010 then
From being unoptimized to now really good looking games to being optimized
games being optimized... a handful. Most devs still require amd and nvidia to make hotfixes through drivers. so nope, optimization software-wise I disagree
I'm waiting for the 1440p 144hz IPS monitors to drop to 200$ ๐
That ain't changing in never
I'll still put down 400-600$ for a 1440p 144hz VA/IPS anyways
Oh?
so that means apples, you are okay that since consoles generate a high revenue, they also are allowed to decide the speed of development?
But 1440p could prove great for us
you may not realize that also (a lot) of moeny is consumed to just adapt software, engines and everything associated to consoles
Well, I am not a pc enthusiast compared to the 95% of people here neither do I care if you play or support consoles
I just care to let people know what big companies are doing. And people should be mad at them
For the frame rates really
Nice ping :)
But we're gonna overcome the point where it's cheap and easy to run 1440p 144hz
They still release 1440p monitors however
Like Samsung's new G7/G9
It's no good if people keep using 1080p that 1440p becomes worthless
And 4K is just stupid
Too expensive to get it anyways
Not including the cheap crappy 4K really
4K is for TV entertainment
Some movie shit
Get a small monitor like a scrub
Small 4K monitor
I would def invest in that if it weren't so goddamn expensive
Small as in monitors you usually find small for their resolution, like 32" 4K
Not like 2" 4K
100"
Ultra HD
6'
Hello pixels
Wait they don't fucking list the 1440p
Fucking dumbass graph excludes 1440p >:(
Isn't UHD 1440p anyways
Because it says 4K, which literally is 2160p
Ah
Yeah
No 1440p
(4K)
So it's pretty much
2160p
Never included 1440p
Bum ass image
UHD is apparently both 4K and 8K.
Uhh
The graph only confuses me
The graph is fucking horrible
Get a better one
1" viewing distance
Fucking 8K
"The graph only confuses me"
it's in feet AAAAHH
the second, not first
Right okay
The only inches allowed is diagonal.
1 feet

Closest on the list to view on
And it's listed
8K
So if I have a bigger resolution
I must look very close
If I have a smaller resolution
I look farther away
Past 1080p, it now lists the higher resolutions
This is just a bad graph
I saw some of ludwig's monitors. Those tiny ones which are powered by USB. I want those
Those are just console peasant graphs : ) ) )
So 1 feet away, I look at 8K
if I go say
5 feet
Go 1080p
Ok thanks
auto-resizing resolution depending on far away you are ๐ค
well also have to take FoV into consideration
that would be a neat project, if doable
11 feet away, consider a 1080p 85" monitor
1 feet away, consider a 85" 8K
Well to be fair, it's just too far
But also
It's a fucking 85-120"
The graph is just too confusing
I just dislike it more and more lmao
I am not okay with the last graph. Clearly no anti-aliasing was present. I bet it was made on a console
No!
Viewing distanc
Ok so I'm just pretty stupid
It's only saying that it will show pixels the closer you get
Fucking dumb graph with no explaination
But also
I just give up
Still is confusing nonetheless, but makes some more sense now
Resizing resolution depending on distance isn't too unfeasible, but making it fluid or smooth doesn't seem feasible. You can just use a distance sensor that you adjust to the face of the person watching the screen, but constantly changing resolutions, assuming you don't just downscale-upscale.
4K gaming is dumb though ๐
Unless console
But still
That's why I have 2 RTX Quadro 8000 :)
@sick reef i would virtually up- and downscale it. Not saying something like this would be useful
Would be useful for auto adjust FoV imo but thats not possible with how games work
@abstract kite I get to play around with 27'' 4k monitor soon, I have 1440p screen to compare
Imagine getting a 27" 4K monitor
price and features were too good to ignore so im trying one out
Oh? What was the price
How the hell does anyone get that without paying what should be 1000+ lmao
acer xv273kp
this is the model
These released at around 1k and sell normally these days for around 700 euros
if backlight bleed is not too bad i might just leave it as my secondary monitor tbh
lol
Refurbish for 700$
thank god it has freesync
Thank god freesync is cheaper than Gsync
and funnily, thank god freesync version of the monitor i bought does not have a fan like g-sync one does
๐
4K benefits games with shrubbery or picket fences. An actual advantage on some games, clear motion through teeny-tiny gaps between leaves or thick fences.
e. x. in tarkov
Yeah, every pixel seems to matter in Tarkov
Especially the smaller gaps, zooming through
It makes sniping easier, so you know your sight is on the person
Whereas, smaller resolution makes it a pain to aim it on the head if they're far enough
Now all you need is 4K@120HZ with DP 2.1 and G-Sync/Freesync. Next gen high end cards seem plenty capable of touching 70+fps in most current titles. It's completely within the VRR range
A video was done by someone testing this, and smaller resolution basically covered every pixel of the body of a person, while 4K showed the body around the dot sight in the middle of the scope you zoom through
60FPS is all you really need for Tarkov at least
The important part about this. You'd be content with such a rig for yeaaaaaars
Making 4K 144hz is honestly pretty dumb, nothing can really do that without spending 3-4.5K on a PC to run it or something
nothing but wait for ampere
I don't understand the companies and making TVs at least 95% of the people cannot do
Any call of duty you can run at 144Hz with a 1080 Ti @ 4K
4k doesnt provide a benefit worth the price.
Only small benefits if you really need more pixels per inch for some reason
Which for art, sure
Very close, yeah
Eyeball to the screen >:)
Ill get 4k when holograms come out and 4k gets cheaper
good quality catvideos from youtube
Scary how one day they'll make a monitor that we can't even see a single pixel without using some really good microscope
At least it'll be cool for VR
The only way I'd be able to justify 4K prices personally is the thought of it being pretty much an endgame rig. Not just a thing for 5 years or so. Why would you want to go higher than that. Truly diminishing returns from that point.
Reach that point and you're set(in my eyes)
Ill never like vr because of the way movement works.
Theyd have to set up an entire location for 1 game with the games layout lazer tag style
@merry bay i build a rig for witcher 3 got 60fps with max setting (minus nvidia hairowkrs) for 1400 and its alive right now 7 years later
Hardware can and will die regardless of quality, so you can have a system last a long time on a budget
It's not pointless. You get superior AA by just bruteforcing more pixels. You don't have to be at retina breaking points. All it means it's good up close AND up far.
If they want to despite that though thats up to them. I just try to get involved when people might get something less than they would need
Expensiveee
Now HDR is something I'm not ready to dish the money for. Barely any games support it and it's still tastes like a beta even with the top tier models.
Dealing with messy dimming zones just because HDR is enabled around blacks. just ew
Especially after you pay such a premium
FALD is fine apparently with top end models
I dont know would i pay that either, Good thing is you can just send it back if its not your jam
most likely it ends up as my secondary screen
Im going for next gen anyways this year
Talking about the 3000s from nvidia?
yes sir
I'm a firm believer in Big Navi or 3000 series. Probably siding with nvidia for DLSS 2.0
Seems like a very reachable goal.
DLSS 2.0 + ampere GPU is the dream
hopefully that tech kicks off, Looks promising in control
Only thing that kept me from splurging on a 4K monitor so far is the prices still being pretty volatile. But this year finally saw some options with barely any compromises(if you don't aim for HDR)
4K is a nice option for not heavy games at least
and still the idea of whether to go for IPS/VA or wait for OLED to get better.
the absolute worst would be burning in your golden display
Oh yeah OLEDs are a thing
Today it would be something between 1 and 2 thousand bucks.
But there's also some new panels coming up this year with preorders around 650. Market still being shaken up
Would love to fast forward a year, maybe two
witcher 3 is already 7 years old? damn. time flies
Anything that seems recent is old now
Battlefield 3 being 9 years old
That was such a major improvement in graphics, looked great
Aside from the heavy blue tint
7 is also the number of platforms Skyrim is released on
What about GTAV?
Should be 5 platforms now
I now have the motherboard
Which should have arrived 3 days ago if I didn't have to fix order 3 times
Didn't you expect it some friday? Last week? 2 weeks ago?
Who cares
It took forever since it didn't order 3 times
Now I have it
Now my 3700X and RAM won't be sitting lonely
how's the bracket situation
think i recall not having AMD mounting for the DRP4
Oh that
Didn't find
I pretty much just gave up at that point
I'll have to order the AM4 from their site
welp, is that what they recommended through contacting them?
they had some kind of replacement part form
Yeah that thing I only found
I can't see why it couldn't be one book instead of Russian, Spanish, English, whatever else language in separate books
Now I wonder why it made me think of the dumb PS4 ad
I'd assume its more efficient for production runs and ship internationally the same package.
Occasionally I'd get something that only includes Polish manuals. Kinda reveals where they sourced it from, but most people check online manuals that are more up-to-date anyway.
Not uncommon for a link in the front of some manuals to suggest looking it up online to be up-to-date
I love it when a manual is telling you how to do something and before it does it says "refer to the manual"....
manual for your manual
Worth noting that the asus 450 f doesnt say its 3000s ryzen ready but it actualy is out of box without the bios update
570 is more future proof
Nice boxes you got over there
Are they important or no?
Quick Question: i got a gtx 1050 rn and looking to upgrade to an RTX 2070 but heard that now is a bad time to buy GPUโs. Thoughts?
If youโre looking to do 1080p 144hz, you can go for a 2060Super or a 2070/Super
Otherwise I can recommend waiting for the new GPUs
Yeah might do the super models then. Anyway to know if my get bottlenecked by my processor?
Which is?
amd ryzen 7 2700x 3.7 ghz 8-core processor
Yeah itโll be perfectly fine, no problems at all
Sick thanks! Will prolly get it September so I can play Cyberpunk and such.
O wait
The delay
Cyberpunk only DX12
If itโs gonna be September, then wait for the GPUs
also still waiting for ASUS to respond to my gpu
The GPUs are supposed to release on September
So youโll just be better off waiting if thatโs the case for upgrading your GPU
its gonna be another 2070 no matter what
Hm?
It has better RT cores
He wants to do ray tracing
Or more cores, either way itโs better than previous gen in some points
Seeing how AMD is supposed to overcome the 2080 Ti at least, NVIDIA might do it this time around, to keep above AMD as a real upgrade
New GPUs are most likely, at least going by leaked info coming out in September
Heard itโs gonna be the 3000 models though right?
Uh as far as entry and midrange gpus they're another 4 months after
RTX 3000
Well assuming AMD don't decide to release midrange preemptively
Okay 
It hurts trying to put it in with all the shit on the other side of the board
I hated the cabling. Built my first build January and boy was I stressed.
Plus I was spooked more when my friend called me out for building on carpet.
so im putting a computer together and im struggeling to how many watts i need for it
ryzen 3 1200, rx480 8gb, 8gb dd4 ram 2300hz, 1tb hdd
Put it all into pcpartpickers pcbuilder @olive hinge
It will tell you . Then get something with a little more just incase
Invest in faster RAM, it really shouldn't cost much more. Zen 1 supports 2666mhz natively; though I just remembered they are making Zen+ revisions of the 1200 so it could support 2933mhz natively
And for wattage you can use the estimated wattage that pcpartpicker gives you, and add like 50%
I think that's a good practice cause it gives you the overhead for efficiency and all that
So for example if a build would draw 330W, adding 50% would put it to around a 500W Psu
Oh one other thing I hope for the RAM you're getting a dual channel kit, meaning 2 4gb sticks instead of a single 8gb stick
That makes all the difference, otherwise just go for 16gb
ty guys
Alright, so I got it all set and running first try
Important details to notice:
1: Date is set to yesterday, 6:19AM
2: Audio is fucked for some reason
Actually never mind about the audio
Alright, got everything fixed. Guess that wasn't too hard aside from finger pain for DRP4 uninstallation
On second thought, the audio is still a bit weird
How so
The voices in music sometimes need to be louder, it just sounds very quiet compared to other sounds
Some other sounds are also quiet
I'm still going to need to fix that, but that'll just be some testing. Perhaps it's not so bad in games unlike music/video
Today I increased my SSD from 1 terabyte to 2. When they put the new SSD they also transferred some of my files from my old SSD. I assume the old files were interfering with steam. So I deleted every file that has the word Steam then i downloaded and install Steam. Still having the same problem where the desktop app keeps refreshing every second. It looks like it's trying to connect to the internet but being stopped halfway through and trying again, repeat over and over again. It has full permissions and I even turned off firewall, nothing changed. My internet is fine, I can watch YouTube videos on maximum quality while running times two speed. I probably deleted Steam and reinstalled it five times today. After trying to fix this problem for 4 hours, I gave up and decide to hard reset my computer so there will be no traces of the previous files and all the permissions will be reset to default.
So why do people want to sell their 2080Ti's?
I assume sell the card, buy the 3080 for same performance, some money back or sell 2080 Ti
And buy 3080 Ti/3090
Sounds normal
Well its a $1200 card that soon enough, a new card half or maybe even a third the price will match in performance (Well pretty much match, we're talking within 10% or less)
And do ray tracing twice as good
What's that tell you, in a few months a 2080 TI won't be worth what people got it for; so sell it now to maximise price and performance 
of course they want you to sell it, guarantees you will buy a new one
dont fall for tricks
Meanwhile I'm using a vega 64 waiting for big navi to drop
yo is ryzen5 3600 and rtx 2060 6gb a good combo
yes
it can be good, it can be bad. It depends what you want to with the PC and what your components are
i7 8700k
is this normal?
@snow rain i think it's fine but it's nothing special. It also is very limited incase you want to overclock
there is surely also others who give their opinion about. they may sleeping though ๐ด
yes it'll be fine for gaming
thanks man
@tardy tinsel depending on what's going on it's normal. It looks like you are downloading / installing a game
@tardy tinsel Yes the new steam layout has multiple instances. Usually eats up more ram than that.
I was having a problem with steam where it kept on closing and reopening, I restarted the computer and it seems like it stopped
Also the first time this update is run on the machine it will download banners and icons of every game in your steam library
People with several hundred games had sudden data usage spikes the first time round.
yo @merry bay whats your view on the mobo
https://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/B450Mac/
It would work with a Ryzen 3600 like you want. But it seems on the cheap side so wouldn't be the most confident build.
good enough
alight thanks
Hey :D
I have a problem in a game Mirrors Edge Catalyst...
i can't find anyone on the internet who had the same problem as me and i have no idea what it could be but i think this is where i could be helped...
my mistake is the following: when i am ingame after 12 seconds the first freeze frame comes for about half a second or even a second and then exactly every 3 seconds a freeze frame of this length comes...
i have checked the game for errors in origin or reinstalling it didn't help either...
What I noticed in the taskmanager is that the graphics card jumps from 80% to 10%-50% again and again and then back to 80% in the time with the stills, which means the graphics card simply does nothing in the time... I haven't seen this in any game except this one...
Putting the graphics down didn't help either but my pc should be able to handle the easy on max. settings
sounds very weird. is the game on ssd or hdd?
@unreal bloom hdd
@viscid prism i'd start with checking it's SMART, and/or observing read latency/speed during gameplay. i've had a relatively similar issue with Control, turned out to be a dead hard drive.
@viscid prism had the same issue in another game. Turned it was the driver of my graphics that started acting strange. Do have discord open or other apps? While playing
Well it may not be the exact issue but constant freezes every 4-5sec
Yeah discord spotify...
but its just only this game
i have it only on mirrors edge catalyst on origin..
Close em both just for testing
okay sec.
Both apps use something called "hardware acceleration" which will utilize gpu
Still there
But i noticed me that the laggs are stopping in the menu
but the problem was before closing all the apps too
The entire game seems to hitch for a moment. CPU utilization, RAM util and GPU go down for a moment.
this problem makes it unplayable to play this game...
are you using an AMD gpu or nvidia?
nvidia
could try open taskmanager when it happens, helped me temporary when I did not found out what it was causing
(msi)
i did it already...
The entire game seems to hitch for a moment. CPU utilization, RAM util and GPU go down for a moment.
i didnt found a lot of infos out..
no just keep task manager open while playing the game, in the background
also check in the taskmanager that no nvidia service / app is utilizing the GPU
no changes I assume
i could try this sure but right now im downloading the game from [d] to [e]
yea maybe it's the drive although I am a bit sceptical bcause at one point it should stop. Also if the interval keeps being the same it could be a driver issue. Always good to cleanly deinstall GPU driver, reboot and then instal it again
Linus Death Tips
hey gamers, as some of you may know i fucked my cpu a little while ago
Iโm hoping on being able to spend some money next year on a new rig
Ah
my only question is, should i save and get a 3200g or spend it out on a 3600
Because, the more I think about it the more I think that I may not upgrade next year
So getting a 3600 might be a better idea
so I can just upgrade my gpu
I guess yeah, I would expect it to last for a good few years
It's gotten cheaper, so that's good for it
what happened to the cpu?
broken*
๐ข
RAM wouldn't do shit for him iirc
Yeah, probably was a ram pin
Anyway, given that the 3200g is only a little bit worse than my original 2600, i could save the money on it
because itโs like a 70 dollar difference rn
But yeah, go R5 3600, and you should be able to get enough money for an RTX 3060/one of AMD's new offerings of a mid tier GPU that should just demolish at any game in 1080p 144hz at this point
Or you could get a 3300X
Isn't that cheaper than 3200G?
3100 if you want as well if that's actually in stock
Oof
Yeah, itโs called โI want it pretty soon rather than in 3 monthsโ
Huh, I could get a 3100
You can get that if you want, overclocking it to match or pass a 7700K
Well, a 3100 is just my 2600 but cooler by the looks of it
Yeah, so thatโs a possibility
If your GPU is fine, then you can invest into a 3600, when you have enough money to afford the new GPUs with or without selling your current GPU, it'd be neato
Oh yeah I forgot that happened
so itโs 3100 time
So for next generation of GPU. Won't something come out that is lower cost, but still preform as good as the 3080Ti/Super? $1200 for a GPU is a bit of a hard pill to swallow.
So the 3000s are rumored to release at a lower price than the 2000s. Its a rumor though
The prices on the other cards on the market should go down however as long as they dont get discontinued like the 1080 ti
They just discontinued turing recently
Or are about to
September 17 is the rumored release date for the new cards
Why would they have a lower price for the newer GPU's?
I have no idea, like isaid its a rumor
Even if production costs are cheaper theyre a business. Theyll maximize profit
The reason for lowering prices is simple, they have competition looming; mining is practically dead; either way the 3080 ti will be at least $1000 so not much of a price drop
Oh boy $200 less then recently projected
Ah that's the fun part
The 2080 ti had an original MSRP of $1000
But they set it to $1200 anyway
When newer GPUs drop to a price of a console or less then that's when I'm likely to buy.
I dont see a new release gpu ever being that inexpensive
5700XT Was
When you build a rig the gpu is ~50 to 60% of your budget anyway
It really is
When you realize that a 2080ti is 200% more expensive than a 5700 XT, but only like 35 - 40% faster something's wrong
The strix fits lol
@brisk badger The problem is still there...
@brisk badger i reinstallet the game to [E] and (reinstalled) the grafik driver
:I
this makes it impossible to play ๐ฆ
the problem wasnt there at the beginning
When you realize that a 2080ti is 200% more expensive than a 5700 XT, but only like 35 - 40% faster something's wrong
@vapid crypt
Is that a bad thing? Lol
Yes 
Really?
@brisk badger I fixed it ๐
Is 35%-40% faster not good?
I mean its better but not for 200% more money
@brisk badger i just tought i did everything but it wasnt at the menu the lagg so i decided to create a new game and its fixed but i hope it wont come back like before...
Its the way the market has prett much always worked
If that 40% extra speed results in never dropping below 60 fps in your games. Plenty of people would and did pay
To a certain extent, but just for perspective going back to pascal
The 1080 ti is 50% faster than a 1070
And it was what $300 difference
So 50% more performance, 100% more money
That makes a bit more sense
Uea but you gotta remember the market we are dealing with. They literally discontinued the 1080 tis when 2000s came out to make you pay more for the new stuff
^
What if the GPU was about 25% of your budget? ๐
I can get behind that @vapid crypt
The Linux creator I said
He has a 3970X with an RX 570/580 because he doesn't game lol
Ah ok
Joke went over my head like Drax in guardians of the galaxy
Ohgod. What if they discontinue the 2000s on release of 3000s and the 3000s are more expensive not cheaper
Mm
.<
I think they'll just discontinue 2080 Ti
of course 3000 series will be more expensive
its nvidia we are talking about lol
also turing prices should hike up too soon when they stop making new ones
But what if it is cheaper?
They pretty much stopped making them
F for the 2080 ti, it will be matched by a card less than half the price 
Atleast in RT performance
Pretty glad that the 30xx series are alot cheaper than 20xx series in release date
@abstract kite
The RT performance no question will be faster though
They are not confirmed to release 3000s for less than 2000s
I eat my socks if their step below titan card will cost under 1500
3090?
Yup + not much fps difference from ray tracing enable or not
No clue what it will be called @fleet canopy
@lucid basalt gotta keep up with the news boi
I do. Its not confirmed to be that way.
They're still making Titans apparently
3060, 3070, 3070 Ti, 3080, 3080 Ti, 3090, and Titan
I wish we have 16GB VRAM gamer GPUs
Bruh soo much rumors end up to become true 85% of the time @lucid basalt
Like for the 3080 Ti, should have 14-16GB VRAM
Id like to see the actual stats you got that % from.
The market we are in right now would never follow through on that. Theres a pssibility but its unlikely
If they can get away with charging more they will
11gb VRAM is enough
do you happen to know how much vram your average game is allocating?
Well for 80ti gpu
I'm pretty sure some games use up more than 11GB of VRAM at this point
Such as..
Well we dont need more than 11GB so i don't mind if they keep it at that this year too
Well 8k is the new "4k in 2013" or such
iirc I heard Tarkov takes up more than 11GB, and at this point, I feel like we just have it for a good long time
I dislike how they focus on 1080p and 4K more than 1440p tbf
I'm still holding onto my 1070 for dear life at this point lmao.
well the average game today uses less than 6gb. vram consumption scales exponentially with the resolution size
gotta have that pixel density on point am i right gois
Damn thank god I have the RTX 2070 super
As soon as i go to 1080ti, it will become the minimum
Damn thank god I have the RTX 2070 super
1080 Ti won't become a min for a good long time
2070 super is sweet spot for price + performance
No. @late shuttle 1080ti will never let you down on 1080p resolution
I'm on 1440p
@abstract kite yes
Ofc it will let you down but maybe not right now @lucid basalt
Obviously its a 1080p card because its called 1080Ti
Atleast it living up to it title
: )
titanium tier 1080p card
Lmao
Until newer games will screw with the 1080ti encoder
Causing less fps due to it old encoder
I hear 980ti's can still whoop ass.....
Just more optimized
graphic progression in games is struggling ๐ ๐
The older ones stop getting updates for their drivers, etca.
I did get a good deal on a 3900
nvida has some decent driver support for older gpu's. that's really nice
so now I have a 1070 with a 3900 lmao. I feel backwards
Bro wat
3900?
@late shuttle brudda
Doesn't exist
You dont need a cpu over 3700x for gaming
unlucky: "will it blend?"
I have the default 3600
If you mean good deal as in 420$
That's just gets lowered over time
Wonder how the new Ryzen 4000 run
I have to see what's good with my 3700X now
sorry 3900x*
At least it's such an improvement over my 7700K lel
I'm also rocking noctua ugly brown
Bruh
I'm rocking with stock AMD cooler until my LC comes
Im confused. Isnt 3700x an am4
I gave the 3900x cooler to my gf for her build.
Oh ok
Stock AMD cooler is still holding up pretty good NGL
I'm now with a pretty cool stock though
im rocking 1440mm of radiator surface area and 1440p display
numbers are fun
It still gives me around 80c like what i had with 7700K + DRP4
Idk the brown is kinda
The case fits with the fan
Old pic. I dont have the stock cables anymore
embrace the brown
Better spray paint that shit
Quick pick
1080p 240Hz TN
1440p 144Hz VA
1440p 144Hz IPS
ips 1440p 144hz
I play Siege, but I also play other games aside only Siege
1440p 144hz seems good for siege. Probably need a beefy PC to do 1440p 144hz
I do have a good PC to do 1080p 144/240Hz, 1440p 144hz, I'm totally fine
I hate it, she loves it
Crappy case color
competetive games are light, 1440p is the way to go
My brother downloaded Rust on my PC because he doesn't care
Plus because 3700X and show
Too bad it late for it possibly to be considered game of the year
Hmmmm
He's actually surprised by just how fucking good it looks 
Think he runs 1080p 60Hz, maybe 1080p 75/120Hz idk
He gets stutters quite a bit due to having a R5 2600 on Rust lel
Playing 60 fps games unless the graphics is amazing hurts to see
After playing 144hz+
I have a 1440p 60Hz
I game on 1440p 165hz
At the moment, if only I could achieve true 60FPS without the 1%/0.1% lows going below 60FPS then it'd look really smooth
Jump to high refresh rate wagon, You will be pleased.
Well of course
Just gotta have monee
or wait for next birthday/christmas 
Don't understand how LG still has a monitor that's IPS and then somehow better IPS
Only difference apparently is a bit better color stuff
nano ips?
I have not been reading too much about that, Probably not a game changer or anything. Sounds cool though
BenQ monitors ftw
The LG one about 380$ which is pretty good, probably the ASUS TUF one, hm
Only on PCPP though, not a lot to pick
But $
I know there's much more
Lmao
Damn
I probably can just get myself an AIO tbf
LG and Samsung have the best ones now with all the bells and whistles. HDR is meme and most likely out of your budget (1000 peak brightness and good FALD basically needed)
I had AIO in my first build
Just get any IPS 1440p 144hz monitor and you are happy boye
AIO is the way to go
Heard it was 600$ though lel
Unless your old case doesn't support it
I like air better. Peace of mind
Don't mind paying 600$ for it tbf, but meh
also its VA
do you want it to be only fine for 600
That G7 monitor looks sick though
how much is LG 27GL85 for you
Oh they do have a 27" one
700$
lol
"Crystal clear picture"
It's curved as hell
The price is considerable
Knowing it's a 240Hz
1ms
Not a single fucking way would I reach 240FPS on a 1440p
Except siege
I can about reach a fairly nice 230-300FPS on that
Smooth cursor :D
Clearest words on a 240Hz
: )
I might invest into it
But then again it's just overkill lmao
Although I'll just keep that as a list to order at one pointr
"Dropping frames means dropping chances to put your enemy in the dirt"
With a 1000R curve, the most curved thing to exist atm I guess, "Infinity Core Lighting(?)", 1ms, QLED, 240Hz, 1440p
As well as HDR600
Which I yet still have to know more of
I guess the G7 just offers more like 240Hz and curve lel
and you dont have to watch ghosting against gray surfaces


