#pc-build-help-and-tech-talk
1 messages · Page 62 of 1
index best if you have $
vive best if you have some $
oculus quest best if you dont have $
i think this is the general consensus regarding VR nowadays
If you don't have money and haven't tried anything better. The Oculus Quest is the way to go.
oh right the Quest exists
It's not as high specced, but it has controllers and doesn't need any lighthouses. Doesn't need to connect to a PC either.
yeah
standalone is really cool, i figure if HTC or even Valve hop on that soon they'll have some big business
hell HTC already knows how to make a vr headset without lighthouses (cosmos, am getting one) so i figure their next step is a standalone
Isn't the Cosmos that headset that everyone said to steer clear of? Bulky controllers and tracking failing often. Costs more than a vive too.
And the controller batteries only last 2-4 hours. Really low
If that’s what you hear, just avoid it I guess
Maybe check on tech reviewers, I bet Linus had his share of experience with it
I got the perfect name for the WW1 horror game, Hysteria 1915
cosmos works better for me because i can't really put lighthouses anywhere without taking up space my family needs
my eyes also aren't the best for VR so i normally keep sessions whenever i get my hands on a headset under an hour
it's a more convenient option for me, there's plenty of bright light in my living room (the tracking only fails if there isn't good lighting) and controller bulk isn't an issue at all rly
@vapid crypt I got Index. 120 Hz and pretty nice!
@median moon the thing that would drive me mad is the tracking having too many flaws. Getting close to your head or overlapping your controllers it freaks out.
e. x. you try to aim a weapon in Pavlov and you're just incapable of getting it close to your face.
i just took a look at the base stations for the vive and uh
wew
those are pretty compact
Yis
We talkin about VR not monitors >.>
@queen timber glad to hear 🙂
ouh, nice
woop
Every card is different, only way to know is testing and see if it works fine.
Careful not to burn your card out.
I’m too scared to try and overclock mine because I’m not gonna be able to replace mine if I burn it out.
@patent needle It's hard to burn your card, if you don't touch temp limit, your card will just crash if it will get too hot
I know, I’m just scared because it’s an RTX 2070
And I don’t wanna risk the integrity or anything about it
I’ve over locked my old computers 1060 like it was cool but
I don’t have any cash to replace this shit
Still don't have any idea what you are all on about
@patent needle You got at least 1 year of guarantee :p
I do?
Modern cards now make it easy to just let you max out the power limit, and if you set the clock to max limit or whatever I'm pretty sure it just boosts as high as the silicon, power and temps allows at that point. Don't sweat it too much anyway, if you're happy with the performance you're getting then let it be.
I would like to translate the game into German 😋
If you’d like to help, please mail press(at)10chambers(dot)net and say that you’d like to help translate the game into German 🙂
???
A gtx 1050 is good enough for this game right?
passable, yeah
check their faq or troubleshooting
technically i should go here
but i go there
i do the same sht
and it still asks me
Makes sense that the 5600XT is performing the way it is cause it literally has the same die and shaders as the 5700, if it weren't power limited it would literally match the 5700 in everything except 1440p
Well within reason cause modern games are gonna be using quite a bit of vram in 1440p, 6gb might be the absolute minimum atm but that won't really last for too long
cant get 60 fps with 1080ti 4k high
while my friend with 1080ti get 100+ fps
this really weird
In this game? What are the CPUs?
Hmmm and you're both playing at 4k?
Cause if that's the case, while 4k typically is GPU bound
also, @vapid crypt i have revised my build mind taking a look
Boost 2.0 isn't that much of a difference if it's the same setup.
Are you running the same settings?
Its likely simply a cpu bottleneck, try setting the cpu culling to low maybe?
Like AA etc.
yes he high and me too
fxaa both
default
i get his fps in 2k
its like he git 2k perf with 4k setting
And you have the same cooling solutions for your GPU?
how do you compare fps? staring at the same wall?
he has stock cooler il watercooled....
GPU runs fairly worse at 99% as compared to 85~
So your watercooled is running worse. Are you running higher or lower temps than him?
what?
What temperatures do your GPU's run at during Load?
watercool runs better then stock..
No, I am not. At specifically 99% GPU usage, you get a noticeable performance decrease.
ofcourse
Which is why I stated it.
no
So what does his run at then, on load.
you mean throttle
No, I am not. At specifically 99% GPU usage, you get a noticeable performance decrease.
What
Ye
thx
I say: no
I've never heard of that tbh
You dont get a performance decrease you just get a lag spike
It was the BattleNonSense conclusion after testing around.
hes wrong
And as said, that was specifically running the GPU at 99%
running at 99 means you will be overloading and it will try to constantly reset, no decrease in performance though
As far as I understand performance will only drop if you run out of Vram
Or indeed thermal throttling
Yeah
85% might be a bit of a stretch, but I think his recommendation was around 90
idk about your gpu's but in my 16 years of playing around with gpu's I always had them at 100% load
unlocked fps is 99%
or at least it was the goal, sometimes singlethreaded applications
I'll get what it was I watched.
may not get your gpu fully loaded
no more
ive run mine 100% and had the games run fine, cpu is what bottlenecks every time and causes performance issue not gpu in my experience
I mean my GPU typically runs at 100% usage
vsync
they are meant to run with that usage. if my gpu only has 90% load it would not use the full core speed but throttle it rather
my gpu fans dont even turn on unless its at around 95%, you dont get any performance below that
Yeah that's what I've noted, if the gpu isn't running at 100% or near that then it won't hit its target max clock
Likely because it isn't being utilized, so its downclocking to run more efficiently
What it was was input lag.
In that link is what I saw.
As to the discussion, I was wrong regarding performance decrease.
Hey guys, I got a friend that I know for a fact has completed A1 (and other levels), but now they logged on and it says A1 not completed. Any thoughts? We did a client restart.
But wasn't what I was trying to really get at.
That answers none of the questions at hand lol
Its a rare bug apparently, never had it happen to me personally
Is there any way around this nasty progress reset bug?
Maybe ask the Devs
I don't recall if there was a solution for it, they are aware of its existence though
@bronze spruce did not hear about that issue. If your friend did not clear A1 first but started with other mission, that will not make him progress. however if he did A1, then B1 or B2 etc. then he should have unlocked them
Going back to the other guy, he shouldn't technically be running worse if he runs watercooled contra stock.
So it sure feels as if something is wrong.
That was what I was trying to get at.

tbh this fps comparison, how valid is it
Pretty.
a 2600 vs a 3700x.. not quite valid in my books but still
how do they test it?
doing the same input, recording frames every second and compare?
he started with the same setup but cpu is different. Probably everything is different
Because either something really is wrong, it's a game quirk, or they have in actuality different settings.
you can't just compare fps
Yeah not only are you comparing 6 to 8 cores, which doesn't matter in this game most likely; but you're also comparing 13% better IPC and a processor that has like what double the L3 cache?
If it's Ryzen it could be RAM timings as well.
if your components are different you cant expect the same result
even looking at the same place does not mean both should get the same fps
i wouldnt complain about 60fps on 4k though lol
You won't get double your graphical performance due to the CPU.
i got 3200 cl14 ram
Isn't feasible.
100fps in 4k seem a lot to me tbh with their setup
i agree
Unless you ran atom against 7700+
maybe its 4k upscaled. not native
^
even if setting is 4k
I wouldnt even run this game at 4k tbh. theres no reason, the textures arent detailed enough to notice a difference
either that or hes got all his components overclocked in order to run that
which still seems like its a push
You sure he doesnt have a 2080ti?
lol
There was this dude complaining about getting 100fps with a 1080ti at 1440p a while back, think he was using a 7700k. He was complaining cause it wasn't perfect 144... so that's pretty consistent to what's been said
If that's the case I doubt there's a 1080ti out there that can get 100 in 4k
1080ti is quite outdated now for those figures so yeah
2k was more popular for the 1080 4k wasnt really a thing then
idk but the 2080 is not a super jump in performance from a 1080
maybe at 4k there is a bigger difference
No not the 2080, but the 2080ti is ~30% faster, maybe more
How the fuck do you fuck up your resolutions in settings tho
30% faster than a 1080ti?
That's correct, the 2080ti is about that much faster
And more consistent frame times
2080ti was basically made to run 4k
yeah
With T-AA I get it, because it's cheating, but this just sounds like someone trying to "one up" their friend.
Not sure if that makes sense, what happens if he sets the resolution to 1440p
we will try
im sure fps will stay the sale
same
cant get 50 fps difference wuth same gpu
You can
Also you might have to restart the game after any resolution changes, I'm not entirely sure but it might not take effect immediately
impossible
But not like that
dont forget to stand at the exact same place looking at the same direction
Usually takes that one GPU is in a horrible condition though.
Also check your clock speeds
its on the first scene
Though doesn't seem like the case.
he get 100+ i droo to 55
First scene as in after the drop?
look
Where you're just standing there at spawn
look osd top left
gpu 99 fps 58
at this time he get 100+ fps
impossible in 4k for me
no i dont
Get one.
but i trust him is really good friend and we dont understand
why so much difference in fps
Direct comparison is an easier way to actually get to realize why.
Because otherwise it's just spinning theories.
Also what is your cpu culling workload set to?
ive got his screens
I don't actually know how much impact it would have on framerate, I'm more so curious
comparing fps like that is almost impossible to find a proper solution
It'd still be roughly equal.
doesn't look like the same FOV at all
Why does he have two mem tabs for GPU?
see so many factors that can fake this comparison
he have fov maxed out
I was asking about this setting
See what that does is it offloads rendering onto the CPU
this is part the "do you have the same settings" stuff
allright
Eh maybe, set it to whatever his is at
and you believed him after he said "only the cpu's are different" lol
Or not, its not exactly fair since his CPU is faster too
No
but my gpu 99 usage so no bottleneck
But I'm trying to find out more.
No, there's def a bottleneck even if the usage doesn't make it apparent
i think maybe the high load cpu cannot give high fps when gpu is 99 usage
your gpu is the bottleneck but that's totally fine
this game is not really cpu intense and also not very much multitasked
So, him having two mem tabs in the GPU MEM doesn't mean he runs dual GPU then, or would it show two GPU's?
gpu
no hes only one gpu
1080ti
same as me
just me r5 2600 and him 3700x
cpu culling is the key i hope
and its an alpha so
maybe he is good in having a clean OS
depending on what you have installed and running in the background, yea
true
background is what run in backgriund nothing related with os
i have nothing in background and standby list cleaner clean my ram
He is trying to communicate an idea, not a fact.
I think you guys just have too different systems to make the comparison. there is yet to be proven he runs 4k natively
he cannot even make a screenshots GRRRRRRRRRRRRR
hes good friend he dont lie lol
Yeah, that's an odd one.
we just got different cpu
and probably he does not troll but not understand or tell something
you dont trust me? ok np
We have tried, but it's very unspecific.
you guys have not even the same screenshots
and?
It becomes more theory crafting than actual concrete work.

And then we can never find out why.
it's like you guys play different games on different resolution then compare
it's like you guys play different games on different resolution then compare
@brisk badger this
comparing fps like that is very difficult if not impossible. sure you can get rough estimates of what is okay and not but by simply staring at the same direction doesnt mean you should get the same FPS
yea and I tell you that's dumb
it's not the same scene when I check the two pictures
ok
you look at totally different things with different FOV
he have more fov and more fps
even if it wasnt same scene should not have so much fps difference
i can only recommend what labcat said, or try a benchmark software that focuses on gpu stuff, so you have an approx. comparison
yes and no
will try down cpu culling
it's a huge difference but maybe you look through a wall and behind are 10 sleepers?
i guess relevancy makes them render
If you haven't tried culling yet, do so.
Because that should have been done when you noticed you had them set differently.
i mean i never go over 70 fps while hil is alaways around 100 even in fight
so yes thats weird
that's more useful info. personally I think he doesn't run 4k, but 2k, maybe upscaled as someone said
oh I get it now, you both a screenshot when you got dropped out of the pod
the HUD almost looks identical so yea maybe he is on 4k
you understand me now?
im familiar with this and never see something like that
with same gpu
i think 100FPS+ is quite a lot for 4k. Your fps seem much more realistic
i 100% agree with you
but his hud look 4k
so
what the hell
i go shower after gonna down cou culling and i let you know
i am about to search his monitor but I need to go sleep
allright
maybe the devs will add in the far future a benchmark into GTFO. Would be nice but is more luxury
back
they should first add matchmaking lol
gonna try down cpu culling
damn i hate alphas
@median moon at this point, go for a 2080/ Super with that CPU haha
Unless you already got GPU
Because 3900X is a tad overkill for it
my CPU and GPU are birthday gifts
i can't really stretch my budget beyond the $1000 already on those
not really
Ah, okay
maximum frames
intel in 2020
plus i'm not only doing gaming, school will be requiring me to do a lot more online projects in the coming years and i want good performance for those
plus i'll be helping my friend video edit and eventually streaming myself later down the line
also X570 > Z390
3700x is enough
else you can always rent out some cores to me incase they are unused
downlaod cores
Maybe in 30 years
5900XT link?
3d print your gpu
i mean you can rent clusters
Actually considering how cloud gaming is starting to be more prevalent, in a way
As long as the damn AMD GPU doesn’t have bad updates like 5700/XT
downloading my PSU
You will be able to download a gpu 
@vapid crypt 2070: people are now downloading cases
download money
That's semantics though
2070: people download everything
downloading cases can already a thing with 3d printers :p
Its like how you can stream your games to whatever device using Steam already
if we can download money then thats the end of this world
aren't the next gen consoles offloading some physics to cloud to compute?
I didn't hear about that, but I wouldn't be surprised
Maybe that's how they're doing the ray tracing
The world is unlike Cyberpunk 2077
announcement of dying light 2 and cyberpunk delayed in the same week .. ouch
please, never work with windows server or anything with windows and that regard
Instead of cool cars, guns, and a cool city, you get animals of nature, a vast barren land of death, and very limited resources
Dying Light 2 was delayed as well? Damn
Eh, Dying Light was fun
WDL?
watch dogs legion
But the final boss for the normal campaign wasn't a fight and extremely disappointing
watchgogs is trash
And The Following was it, that ending was shit
dude
good games have to be delayed.
else the publisher is putting pressure on the dev team and they have to release a half finished game before christmas sale starts etc.
They could have used some improvements in the Watchdogs game, but it was fun overall
Just not something you’d play for 500 hours
Ah
The last games I played from Ubisoft was Farcry 2, never finished it
farcry 2 was insane
Got kinda long in the tooth, maybe that's my fault for trying to do everything
a video compare farcry 2 vs farcry 5 and the physic in farcry 2 is just amzing compare to the 5
That crowbcat video I guess
Rainbow Six isn’t too bad
Yeah my buddy told me Farcry 5 has good gunplay, but over all pretty boring
rainbow six is fantastic
far cry 5 has amazing OST (songtracks)
R6S good
When's Ding Chavez coming back 
Rainbow six siege is a pretty great competitive game, and the mechanics are very well done
Fuck clash though
far cry 5 has amazing OST (songtracks)
@brisk badger i prefer good physic
@fleet canopy :(...
tried playing coop with gf but I got a bit bored by the game
you can listen to the songs without owning the game though :p
clash isn't OP, her teammates are
Kek
her SMG is also objectively one of the best MPs in the game though i'll give you that
Clash is just a fucking human deployable
no running in the halls
Bzzzt bzzzt
Bzzzt bzzt bzzzt bzzt
Not unless I have ash with her boom boom or the AK girl with that thing that propels you backwards and you fall
chills in warden
Nomad
Noice
someone with 1080ti?
for what
for comapre performance
my friend get 112 fps in 2k then 108 fps in 4k
with same gpu than me while i get 55 fps in 4k
2K
4k
Can we all start using 1440p
2K is kinda
it's both 2k, it has to be
it is I the master of the screeshots 🙂
the loss of 4fps going 4k is not possible
no you can see the osd is smaller in 4k
true
i agree, shouldnt have 4 fps difference between 2k and 4k
i get 100+ in 2k and 55 in 4k
F12 is the key to make screenshots
that's a photo
hold on ill take a screenshot
you acn see osd is smaller so whats the point?
the game looks 1:1 the same
yes but not the game
a game in 4k has automatically a wider FOV
no resolution and fov are 2 different things
higher fov = more things are visible = more things to render
well your earlier comparison had visibly different FOV's
please just stand at the same location looking at the same direction
it makes it easier to compare
he will bring new screenshot quick
and both of your in-game video settings are the same
The osd shows under "MEM" two valus? I am confused
now that's a proper screenshot. looks like 4k. I can't open my game atm and check how it looks on 1440p but it looks imo like 4k.
Tell your friend to switch to lower resolution and back to 4K
who is the host?, or was that solo
hapcher that what i did
and 108 in 4k
personally the HUD looks a bit like 1440p. But I never played it on 4k. I would have guessed it would be smaller on that size
I was able to make screenshots of my options screen with 4K resolution selected, but it was really just 1080p. Switching back and forth it did it properly
you can even see the framtime curve
my ram corsair pro vengence 3200
there is something really weird here
He's not running the game at 4K that's for sure
Set it to a lower resolution. Restart.
Go back to a higher resolution. Restart again.
It said 4K in my options too, but I had the exact same fps as 1080p
had to do it a few times to properly switch
thats was i was thinking first
i checked his screenshot. it's 4k. not saying the game is 4k but the screenshot is
perhaps the game is broken -_-
That could just be his screen being 4K.
what can i say
alpha things lol
That's what I think too hapcher
Alt-tabbing in 4K and going back I automatically switch back to 1080p.
Options screen still says 4K.
But my case is a little different because I'm doing it through DSR. No 4K screen, only forcing the render at 4K
109775241087809948
?t lfg
Hello! If you are unaware, we have Looking For Group (LFG) channels to help users group up and play the game. They are located here: #lfg-north-america / #lfg-latin-america / #lfg-eastern-europe / #lfg-western-europe / #lfg-asia / #lfg-oceania.
If you are unsure of how to create or join a lobby, please see the instructions here: #how-to-matchmake.
NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERDS
nerd
noob
someone with 1080ti?
me
The only outlier is your friend. His game is not working in 4k.
He's getting the same fps with both 1440p and 4k.
40-70fps is what you can expect from a 1080ti @4k
allright
that what i was thinking
1080ti cannot run any recent game at 190 fps in 4k
and even not 69fps sometimes
so yes
odd alpha thing
Yeah.
managed to oc
to 2666mhz
->
from 2133 > 2666
noticing like 5-10 fps difference tbh
@abstract kite 2666 is still pretty low tbh
I'll be available in about three hours
we can try to work on it then if you wish
all other shit i tried tend to like
fk up my bios
@abstract kite i needs to stil too
@dusty pumice bet
it like
reverted me to
bakcup bios
had to flahs it again
and shit
What all did you try to adjust?
ugh one friends preset
like drddrw smth
-dd
and shit
complicated shit XD
Different ram sticks use different manufactures, you can have samsung dims, micron dims, and hynix.
yeh u said that already but like idk shit about it all
My sticks are Hynix iirc
So not all settings will work
idk where to find mine
Open command prompt as administrator and type in this command
wmic memorychip get devicelocator, manufacturer
You might be able to just copy and paste it
bIL
Okay well thats helpful
XD
Type this in now
wmic memorychip get devicelocator, partnumber
Sup glass
hullo
no single clue
attempting to oc my 2133 to 3133
or more
xD
No
this is command prompt
Can you copy and paste the part number in a DM to me Coffee?
I'll check the ram stick manufacture
also try this and send the info here
wmic memorychip list full
wait what again u need
ah
The part number
this
Thanks
it looks like you have micron die
not bad
is that bad or
xd
oh
XD
well IT SURE AINT GOING ABOVE 2666
if its not bad
xD
should go 4k
lmfao
Lmao
Voltages are probably what's holding you back
yeah cause
when i boot
it
clicks that "-"
from top left
to like a bit down
does it like 3 times
and then shuts down
Download CPU-Z and screenshot the memory tab
starts
shuts down
stars
Like this
Now go to the SPD
Send me that
Select slot 2
and 4
Fucking finally
I didnt want to go off the assumption
that it was micron
XDDDDDD
thankfully we now know for sure
LMAO
Well I need to get back to work
👁️
so I'll DM you later
wait !!11!1
Ye?
damn.
Whats up glass
Gigabyte boards are kinda wack
I had one
they suck
Swapping to a better board that's cheaper
Everything else looks solid imo
cough...
im on one aswel
<--- dies in side
xD
fml man
Wait
ASUS and others were so expensive
hang on glass
huh
I like the case you're thinking of using
But I recommend you get another intake fan
The ram can be swapped out for better sticks since we can drop to the ASUS TUF
what would i switch the RAM with then
Removing the extra fans, https://pcpartpicker.com/list/78MRzN
Basically the same price
Better heatsinks too
Not really
more fans would be optimal
but if you can't budge on price, you should be good for the most part
the meshify c (my case too) is a really good case
for airflow
more fans will probably be my first priority then
but i'm not getting my VR rig or anything hyper intensive until later so that should be fine
thank bil 📣 🤗
Also if you are Are Tee Axe man, you can get a 3800X, overclock it to as high as you could which might get you near 3900X probably, and then you could get a 2080 or 2080 Super
@fleet canopy Nope. 3000 has little to no OC ability. 3900X swamps because of the extra 4 cores over a 3700/3800X
What you buy is what you get within a 10% margin
Hm
But with spending more on the GPU, he may get more gaming performance than just getting a 3900X and 2070 Super
Is he buying it just for gaming?
I’d just get a 3700X and 2080 Super, then later on get one of the Ryzen 4000 CPUs
Yeah lol
The 3900X will outlive 8 cores longer
@median moon What are you buying this PC for?
He’s mentioned some other stuff, but he doesn’t seem to need so many cores for now, and the 12c ryzen 4000 cpu could really be a better benefit than 3900X
He probably was also gonna do some blender stuff, but eh
2080 Super is still good enough for it
Thats true, but how urgent is this PC needed?
I run a 3700X with intention of going to 12c/16c 4000, but I understand not everyone has the cash to get a higher end placeholder chip
Oh and blender?
Keep the 3900X
No questions
Honestly I’d still get a 3700X or a 3800X, because a laptop CPU by AMD beat a 9700K lol
@abstract kite I need your help today
Otherwise i will look somewhere else
im getting in trouble time schedule wise
I should of ordered my parts yesterday
@abstract kite tbh i dont know if it even matters
lol
i dont think i can get the parts anymore in time
It’s not about beating intel. It’s that if a laptop CPU can beat a desktop CPU that powerful, I’m expecting their 4000 desktop CPUs to be even better than that
for this weekend so nvm
Doesnt matter
Possibly will beat the 9900KS too
Damn
i should of done it yesterday
now i wont have the parts in this weekend
and cant do shit other than testing my pc
and bios update
well fuck me
anyway im heading out see you in 15 mins or so
And AMD is the price for performance king. They definitely won’t make it too expensive for a 12c ryzen 4000 cpu
@fleet canopy I get your point. It’s valid, but if he’s intending on doing that he should get a 3600 and wait.
Again, thats $200 that he’s wasting on a chip he wont need in a few months.
Have a good one Groundus
Take care
Yeah
$200
300$ more on budget, and he could land himself a 2080 Super
Its not all about the GPU
With your same argument, why buy a RTX 2000 card now when Ampere will probably be much better
I’d have recommended him a 2080 ti if he were to go for performance lmao
Building PCs is a lot like having children. It’s never a good time. There will always be something bigger and better by the time you’ve completed your build
Amphere may be better, but by now, what games even need that power?
@abstract kite gaming, video editing, streaming, possibly blender or some other modeling program if i get CAD classes in junior year
And like 2080 Super could probably run any game at near max settings with 1080p 144hz
Hm
@median moon Buy the 3900X then.
minor development in ROBLOX Studio too
Yeah I’d just wait tbh
@fleet canopy What games needed RTX when that released?
@dusty pumice my point
also there is no
way
in hell
i could make a balanced build in my budget with a 2080ti
You wouldn’t. But it doesn’t mean you’re not going to get a 2080 Ti or even better one
You wanted to do blender, some stuff like that, yeah?
VR too cant forget that
2080 Ti is literally the best gaming GPU as of right now, and a great blender render card
Let me ask something Mayo
A 2070 Super is about equivalent to a 2080. Are you telling me that's not enough for blender? That's plenty for blender work and the extra cores on the 3900X would compliment it well.
For a workstation, that's pretty balanced
2080 Super would be great, sure.
But it's not necessary for the intended use.
Blender really only needs a GPU with 1GB of VRAM at the bare minimum
Optimal is 12GB but he doesn't have the money for that and the 3900X
Yeah but wouldn’t mean it can’t improve time cuts if I were to get a better GPU
That's true yes
Indeed
but
And AMD is currently killing it right now with their CPUs
You're failing to see the point of having the extra cores on the 3900X
I understand the fact that having more cores is great for that sort of thing
Streaming would take use of them immensely and it's plenty for blender.
A 2070 Super is double the recommended for Blender.
It's
Fine
lemme grab the tr 3990x real quick-
LMAO
Haha good luck getting that
@median moon All in all, your build is fine.
But because Mayo insists on the idea that a 3700X is sufficient for your needs, and that you need a better GPU, here's the same list, but modified with a better GPU and lower CPU.
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/BWmYL2
My only concern is that you'll run into some issues with the 3700X not being enough for all of your tasks, but the choice is up to you.
me, putting the tr3990x and an rtx titan in a matx mini case
Lmao You're gonna need an EATX board for a 3990X
Lol yeah
Honestly you could get away with not using that cooler as well
but
since the 3700X doesn't draw near as much power
i think i'll stay with the 3900X build
It’s not like you’re always gonna use for game
It has better speeds for blender
Why did I get a call from my own phone number?
Spam
blender's only if i get CAD design next year
Well I thought you’d still be doing it otherwise
100% of my 3D modeling has either been in SketchUp (8th grade class) or ROBLOX Studio
📣
If you are gonna do streaming, and probably not do blender if you don’t get CAD Design, then pretty much go for 3900X
pushing for ASAP
Do you have a GPU currently?
no, i have none of my parts ordered
Don’t think he does
finalizing the build before i move on to getting parts
Okay that clears what I was thinking up
MSI craptop
So you have zero desktop parts?
Ok makes sense no worrys just asking
He has a birthday coming up
yes
That’s neat
the gift was 1x free coupon for epic cpu/gpu
but yeah, my timeframe is to have this before the end of school's third quarter
that's obviously a 100% ideal scenario
Pretty much go for 3900X and a 2070 Super
ye S
If some random ass sale comes up, hopefully you can get more for your price
i'm also trying to futureproof it as much as i can considering i'm gonna have to start being more financially independent
in 6 - 7 months?
I mean if you have a little bit more time to wait with that "Coupon"
Yeah I’m hoping to futureproof before life becomes very “Be independent”
you could buy into Nvidia 30 series
i do not have time to wait with that "Coupon"
Yeah
When does it need to be spend then
Well then ur stuck with what you have now basicly
i mean ok
In pc partpicker
that's fine
These components will be good to you for a few years to come to be honest
Indeed
Its just that with my own money
i like to buy into the fresh released product and if you want to future proof thats the smarter thing to do
But hey if you are being forced to spend that 1000 then spend it
i'm not being forced, it's just that i want to get this done quickly
When is the next year of school starting?
if i wasn't currently dealing with a laptop that takes 2 minutes to boot i'd probably wait for new products yeah but i dont really have that kind of time
september
Ends in June something
Aka cooberounk 2077
npcyberpunk
Yeah but i wouldnt recommend stepping into a fresh cpu release if you need it for important things like work or schooling
I’ll never have the summer to play it :(
i don't need it for important things
yet
Eh I’m getting Tarkov this weekend probably
but i do need it to not be out of a PC until nvidia gets their asses in gear with 3000
so
So it’s probably gonna be good fun I guess, my brother asked me to add him whenever I get it so there’s someone to play it with at least haha
tarkov looks fun
I just wanted that bit of extra information to know your time frame
Oh it looks amazing
albeit not anywhere near my style
if i dont know it or dont know if your "forced" to spend it now
VTM?
vampire: the masquerade
@dusty pumice i don't have a deadline but i do have the constant aggravation of my craptop being a craptop
Doesn’t mean you can’t learn to play it 
I do get that
i'd like to not have to wait 7 minutes to boot MW and then play it at 30fps on low settings
throw lag and heat into the mix aanndd wellll
I would recommend something but i dont know if its feasible for you since probably when school starts you will have zero moneys
so theres that
with this current build already i'll have zero moneys
and more than half of it isn't even being funded by me
so like
Thats rough