I only relatively recently started using Btrfs, so take it with a grain of salt, but personally the biggest thing for me is that it makes it significantly easier to manage more drives with less partitions. I think one of my bigger questions with this set-up is what utility a lot of these partitions serve, and what utility Btrfs might give them? Particularly the media partitions feel like. Why? To me. I understand the home partition being separate to root; if you mess up your root, you still have your personal files; but by having that home partition, your media files are already safe in case of corruption. Beyond that, I don't particularly see what a personal media partition serves to gain from using Btrfs? Compression probably would be at best redundant, as large volumes of media should already be stored compressed, and deduplication also most likely wouldn't be necessary. If what you stand to gain from it is just the RAID capabilities, it's worth considering that the utility of RAID gets significantly diminished when over partitioning.
Ultimately the point of this isn't to get you to decide against Btrfs, but to give you an idea of the things you may want to consider while making decisions about how you manage your files. All things considered, I think it may still be worth making these filesystems Btrfs for the sole reason of simplifying. Much easier to learn how to interact with one filesystem than many!!!
P.S. after also recently switching to rEFInd I'd recommend starting with installing GRUB, and then when you're able to boot into Linux, THEN switch to rEFInd. It has an issue where, when chrooted, it won't generate the correct boot configuration of the system you're installing it on, it will generate a configuration that would work for the system you installed it from. So if you're installing from an installation medium, it'll generate the correct config for the installation medium to boot, but NOT the system that you're installing Linux on.