#Don't slurs depend on context
48 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Discussions of the way server moderation is applied are generally meant to go in #1006744879583461418
yes yes goto #controversial-archive
Most words that are considered to be slurs should be avoided regardless of context
https://discord.com/channels/399812551963049995/1083167732532510882
previous thread on the subject. Regardless, the server can make whatever rules it wants. If they wanted to, they can ban any mention of windows
If you don't absolutely need to use that exact word to make your point, it's generally more considerate of others, especially those who have trauma surrounding those words.
if you want "double meaning" slurs to be allowed in the server then this is the place,
if you want to discuss (I'm kinda on your side on this) what should be considered a slurs then #controversial-archive is the place.
@lucid lynx meant the first I think
what two meanings are you referring too?
DMs if it's not comfortable here?
Regardless of context the r-slur is bad because using it to say "x is r****" is literally saying that it's bad because it's comparable to neurodivergency
My body retarded when my lift reached my floor
*word
or that's really offensive xd
but that's not the commonly accepted definition for that word now.
but If I use it in that context it's quite clear
That definition of the word also is fairly obsolete, and very unlikely to come up in a normal conversation.
I was retarded by my safety rope so my fall was less severe-technically okay but probably a shit post to use the R word.
I am retarded- to mean lacking in cognitive ability == slur.
Here is a copy paste from chillzone that I wrote some time ago:
Okay so, I'm gonna start with a brief explanation of what prescriptive language is, and what the medical model of disability is.
Prescriptive language holds that things ought to be a certain way. If something is 'evil' then there is a prescription that things ought not be that way. If things are 'stupid' then again, that holds things ought not be that way.
Retarded here is the same, it is a bad thing to be called retarded, it is inherently something that should be better. "That's retarded" mean it's stupid, and ought to be different.
The word retard came into use through medical language, but it quickly became used to describe people who are ND (neuro-divergent).
Behaviours associated with being ND have also been frequently ridiculed and mocked.
This to the extent that after begining to use it for pretty much anyone who wasn't NT, or who faced a cognitive issue, that they / their behaviours would be described as "retarded".
The medical model of disability faces a lot of issues, it marks people as wrong simply for existing, but without really much sense to it.
Disorder immediately says something is wrong. If I have a liver disorder, you know that my liver is essentially not functioning correctly. But when it comes to people that same word is used, and it's simply because people are different.
Being ADHD, Autistic, so on so forth, is not a bad thing. Someone might be "different" to NT folk (that's neuro-typicals), but they are not broken.
The social model of disability as a contrast looks at the environments people are in. Disabled goes from being an adjective (X is disabled because they have ADHD) to a verb (When you stop X from being able to stimulate themselves with activity, that is painful for them, and disables them, because they are an ADHDer).
The term retard to describe yourself, or another, inherently sends a prescriptive, medical model of disability view, and perpetuates the idea that there is something wrong with ND folk. It is a loaded term.
In modern usage, retard is a pejorative term either for someone with a mental disability or for someone who is considered stupid, slow to understand, or ineffective in some way. The adjective retarded is in the same way used for something very foolish or stupid. Because it is now considered offensive, the word is commonly referred to by the euph...
If someone were to say “I need to retard a signal” - sure, that isn’t a slur, but if someone were to say “you are like this signal, retarded” then it’s being applied to a person’s identity/cognitive function.
It goes almost without saying that certain slurs have contexts where they are okay, but it’s massively important to understand that there can also be shit-posting contexts where it reads as someone trying to weaponise that double meaning.
Example: someone got warned to stop using the r word as a slur, and went out of their way to start using it in a technically okay manner, but really just wanted to use it in the server and thus used it in a way where it’s fallen out of fashion. Language can be complicated.
Have a review of the YouTube video I pinned in my big pin in #off-topic
It applies to both
AuDHDer, we got a few of them, where’s @lucid lynx ? :p
Autistic and ADHDer
this is why you don't buy cheap mechanical keyboards
Yeah it’s common with certain neurotypes
But yeah, I don’t think neurotypes are inherently disabilities, different doesn’t mean lesser
Yes, and I’m looking forward to confirming whether or not I am autistic, I am definitely dyslexic (assessed multiple times)
That’s something I honestly think you should explore first yourself whilst you hopefully look into the social model of disability
Social model is one is disabled by their environment, medical model someone is a disabled person, difference between a verb and an adjective
Subject someone to things that trigger sensory overload, then that will disable them, until they can get through that, and thus their ability to function will diminish whilst they have sensory overload
I don't really know that i'd consider a "severely" autistic person disabled though
they can still live fulfilling lives, it's just difficult for them to integrate with society
I think you mean an autist who has a high level of needs?
yeah that's a better termm
To function in society some people need more help from other people than some other people
Different people have different levels of needs, some people need very little, others need a carer
If you consider yourself disabled, that’s totally fine, but if you’re simply being labelled disabled and not given the option to explore another view point, then that’s problematic
There’s a chance I could be that, but idk because there’s also a good chance that I got misdiagnosed for autism as a young child and my mom used to mention that I’m autistic over and over again almost like brainwashing me or something. But now, I’ve sort of developed ADD or ADHD symptoms, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the internet (particularly YouTube) could have actually caused me to develop one of those. I’ve been having some terrible mind racing events lately (and become very hyper at times) even while not watching YouTube, but I’m not sure how I would diagnose it.
The only autistic traits I have now are just being sensorially overloaded by loud sounds and crowds.
I had a LOT of problems with distinguishing left and right. But then I cut my pinky on my right hand so that was not a problem anymore and other stuff subsided.
You don’t develop ADHD, you simply are or are not ADHD
I feel my symptoms get do get triggered when I'm in certain environments. So maybe they were surpressed/latent and got triggered noticeably after a long time..
Does that make sense?
100%, also more likely to not be able to mask when you're hungry or tired
Ok, good to know! Very hard to tell if there’s any chance I had that all along or not, but I’m leaning toward no.