#Starliner Crew Flight Test
1 messages Β· Page 2 of 1
Nah just a few weeks
oh π
i remember back to when the Dragon capsule was doing the first crewed test and people were saying that of course starliner will launch first, boeing has so much experience so there's no way dragon will launch first
originally, was set for July 2023, but they had issues with parachutes and flammable tape on wires, so they postponed it
then again spacex wasn't anywhere near it's current form at that point
it had it's reputation sure
fair, but i still find it quite funny
it is very ironic, yeah
also, any idea what happened to dreamchaser
JOEING?
hopped on stream and saw this, very ambitious!!
i mean, its easier to launch from mars, so maybe theyre talking about alternate launch locations
starliner to mars
Will be driving during this launch, won't be able to watch this attempt unfortunately (so it'll definitely launch this time)
Thanks for your sacrifice, Butch and Suni will be grateful π«‘
LETS FUCKING JOE
The current countdown in the NXSF app is exactly 40 seconds behind the actual countdown on the stream. Any way to fix that?
which one? NSF or Nasa
because the stream has delay
Exactly 40 second delay?
Nasa is somewhat meh, NSF has had so many people send messages that are then immediately deleted
NASA stream best stream
oop
95% valve rule unfort
The T0 on the app is correct, the clock is counting down to it, you're watching the stream on a delay
110% missing part
From the data entry side of things:
not sure this is gemini 3, NASA
π₯΄
arm retracted
L-10min
T-9 min
We are so joeing
go no.go soon
10/10 comment from streamchat
Godsamn space probouns!
Yusss
WE ARE GO
Fts sounded like he was laughing
14:52:15
whooh this go read was hype
Wonder why they don't have the checklist on the screen

Yay all go
drama
"cleared to proceed"
β
we are cooking
LETS GO BABYYYYYY
usa! usa!
oh ew religion speech
5 mins
fuck this
religion goated
π±π·π±π·π±π·π±π·π±π·π±π·
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
what is it with americans putting anything on a flag
SPEECH SPEECH SPEECH
Are we joeing?
Joei
ng
like the Starliner logo does not work on a flag
π·π΄π·π΄π·π΄π·π΄
LIVE FLAG REACTION
American flag on screen is crazy
people when they see an american flag on an american stream
Usa usa usa
lmao dude taking selfie in front of the countdown clock
right here we go
π«‘
Cmon ncin
US flag jumpscare
GO Starliner GO USA
yesss its the goated commentator
how come those unpatriotic astronauts were not standing for the speech?
further along than we gone last time
ula should rename itself back for this launch
actually no nvm no continuity there except lockheed
t-3m
Please actually launch
we need butch facepalm as an emote
please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please LOM
Communist astronauts π’
why do u want loss of mission 
L-2min
communauts
25secs behind
USA US AUSA
o thought it was called calypso
i mightve misheard
1 minute!!
Holy
only way to put a stop to this thing
wasnt calypso the one that was ripped apart and rebuilt?
no this is calypso
60s
i see 45s
30
t-30s

this is good
GO
woo
sick drawing
godspeed butch and sunny
30s
5
5a
1
20s
Yay
LIFTOFF
Liftoff
10
yooooo
raaahhhh
πππππ
Finally
at long last
Took it long enough
NO WAY
COLD
finaly after how many years?
as ice
Dragon 4 years ago:
beautiful shots
onboards?
ground
MaxQ ?\
max queer its june
lots of ice falling
No onboards due to bandwidth limitations
there is onboards
they were just on there in NSF
Atlas V will have onboards, Starliner won't
SRB burnout
booster sep
eyy
bye bye
And a 737 wing
Idk maybe
very sooty exhaust
not me watching in the middle of college orientation
early jettison?
nah abort to orbit
oooo?
im at UMD rn
π
neatoo
at least 6 other people in front of me have it pulled up lmao
you should make them put it on a big screen
BASED
bruh
steampunk rocket
sep
C sep
centaur ignition
Staging
wait whats going on
double centaur looking fine
Uh
skirt jettison
what stream lol
nasa
shouldnt it be ignition now?
It is
it is going
But we dont have a good view
still dropping skirts i thin
on the onboard i didnt see ignition
Gorgeous
graphic shows ignition
Bad view dw
It's hydrogen
I literally saw the SRBS falling away with my telescope
tough to spot centaur running
SHEEEE
Hydrogen plumes donβt really make themselves visible
true
rl10 greatest of all time
my goat
Do second stages ever fail?
just noticed that name
no they underperform
synthetic aperture gaydar is great
strongly agree
10/10 name
ask Apollo 13
we donβt make that joke on crewed launchesππ
Lol
So how's it going?
an extra 31s of isp is wild
itβs joeing
going good
good shit
also yeah that is quite smth
STK my beloved
Seeing 2 centaurs looked different
FUCK I JUST SAW THE DELMARVA PENINSULA
wait did that loss of signal screen have a bouncing square in the corner?
Something is genuinely wrong with you
mf it is CLOUDY
yeah no i wasnt seein anything anyway
starliner has an abort system, it'd probably work
coms are quiet
bro ive been trying to image m81 for the last week and it is NOT WORKING
I did not say LOC
LOM of mission still carries a chance of death/injury
the fuck is this bro π
Thatβs still a fucked up thing to say when people are onboard
that's not what I'm wishing for
LOM now is infinitely preferable to a LOCV in a few years
maryland the only part of the US to not see the aurora
yeah
im still pissed
no it was so bad
i love clouds in the day but at night they better fuck the hell off
We had clouds in cali to when it happened
the clouds came in for the two days of high intensity and then on the third day where the forecasts gave us ~1 hour to see them
time to MECO?
LOM is not preferable at all when there are people on board
~1 minute
there was barely anything according to my friends who drove
real
You should be wishing them a safe flight
Not for their flight to end in some sort of accident
βΌοΈ
common miranda mega L
MECO
meco
it absolutely is, if this thing keeps flying it WILL kill someone, if they LOM now the crew will be safe and there's a solid chance MDD will pull the plug on this mess
Yeah uhhhh don't fucking do that Miranda
MECO
Genuinely not a good thing to say and reflects horribly on your character
REAL
I wish the crew a safe flight, I don't wish Starliner a successful one
Safe flight and successful Starliner flight are not mutually exclusive
Boeingβ¦orbit!??????
A loss of mission is not a safe flight
safe unsuccessful flight
A loss of mission involving crew is a disaster
in what way is starliner unsafe�
Not yet, it's still suborbital
A very long suborbit
nuff not said
well they're perigee positive now
Very close, just 5 (or 25) km short
good stuff
Starliner now on it way
multiviews
Successful sep lets goooo
does anyone know when docking?
~25 hours
solid
See you guys after starship
πππ
very interesting views
starship flight (maybe) and starliner docking tomorrow

good to see
oh hey looks like we're getting views from one of the mission controllers' desktops
this is so funny
What else would they use
were you expecting apple?
idk linux? something in-house?
No
what app is that
That costs too much
MCC runs windows
And requires too much training
nothing we can get our hands on


Not with that attitude
This app is just a FreeFlyer based telemetry visualization tool, it's not used for engineering purposes
Unfortunately
yeah.
Imagine if we just saw KSP open on the taskbar lol
I've seen MOCR guys with this same app for the Artemis I launch so I'm guessing it's an internal software developed exclusively for MOCR work (surprise surprise)
no inside POV?

I'm hoping they switch to it sometime soon π₯²
Nope, not until they are docked to the ISS
(Due to bandwidth limitations)
lame
ah, makes sense.
live chat is completely spoiled by f9 launches
booooo I want to see astronauts
i forgot live chat existed
I was happy for a second there
"jUsT uSe StArLiNk"
iβm glad they activated it unlike northrup smh
this is making me laugh so hard im sorry
ngl does look a lot like RSS
just waiting for the "VAPOR IN FEEDLINES, SHUTTING DOWN"
Can someone send the list of objectives
Guys they have gay RCS
Are they in manual control rn?
Lmao
I believe they will do that after the orbital insertion
Kk
yknow
ngl
i kinda prefer these views to prettier ones that don't have telemetry
yes it would be
Orbital insertion burn
If they don't perform this
They'll reenter
so it's like the Shuttle's burn with the OMS, yes?
Yup
Yes
gotcha
Burn has started
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
Good burn!
The @SpaceX Starship launch tomorrow morning will be live-streamed exclusively on π!
dang it
wrong star[blank] channel
Comms people are telling us that thereβll be no video from orbit until they reach ISS, so I guess Boeing cheaped out on that capability.
I love Gav
i hate twitter streams
lmaoo
Boeing can't be asked with cameras
They explained bandwidth before
man how did I miss it aaa
And now the frantic mass migration of spaceflight media people from the Cape to Boca Chica...
Fr lol
accuweather keeps up with space/astronomy stuff decently well from what ive seen
it's really beginning to hit me that the last time humans went to space on an Atlas was in 1963.
so called free thinking space fans making their way from cape canaveral to Boca chica
anyone got a transparent version of this?
nill belson
kinda wild that none of the original cft crew was on cft
And this wasn't even the original crew
Michael Fincke's place was originally Eric Boe's but he pulled out in January 2019 due to medical reasons
north macedonia? 
Crew Flight Test lifts off with Butch Wilmore & Sunita Williams at the helm, viewed from one of my sound-activated cameras hunkered down just under 400ft away from Atlas V this morning in Floridaπ₯
I couldnβt be more excited for @ulalaunch, @BoeingSpace & @NASA ππ©π»βππ§π»βππΊπΈ
real
"a couple of flights" lmfao so Starliner's entire manifest?
Quoting Michael Sheetz (@thesheetztweetz)
I asked in the press conference but didn't get an explanation for why there isn't any live, or even delayed, video from Starliner post-launch.
Boeing VP Mark Nappi: "We are looking at being able to provide live feed inflight but that won't b...
Wilmore and Williams currently discussing the launch on the Boeing livestream
They seem happy about the whole thing
CAPCOM and Wilmore spent a bit of time discussing some noise coming from Starliner side (cabin fans)
Going through data collection procedures from "VESTA."
@thesheetztweetz Kinda wild they don't even have ground stations given that you can literally get satellite ground stations in AWS
https://t.co/cQS7LTEhuJ
gotta love the bold russian text
proving that the US can never escape the grasp of the russians 
iβm confused why do they keep the brackets (whatever they are on the skirt) for SRBs which arenβt there
itβs just extra dead weight
even with atlas 4/501
Watch live as a crewed Boeing Starliner spacecraft docks to the International Space Station for the first time. Starliner will autonomously dock to the forward-facing port of the stationβs Harmony module at approximately 12:15 p.m. EDT (1615 UTC).
NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are aboard Starliner, which was launched on Wedne...
streamlined production
And makes the booster interchangeable
i get the second point but also it looks like itβs just bolted on
whatβs stopping them from just removing the bolts
and taking it off
A ton of images from todays launch
Thatβs more work
And what if they need to switch the booster
just bolt it back on
if you donβt have them on thatβs some extra weight saved ainβt it
i mean i know they wonβt do it
but atlas v really doesnβt utilise all the performance it can have
thatβs just in general
They donβt need all of the performance in most cases
would be nice to see them push atlas as far as it can go
thats just called new horizons
no i mean actually optimising atlas V to squeeze out any additional performance
chilling prop even more, removing useless weight etc
wdym optimized? NH IIRC already did extra weight removal
chilled prop then
Think it was paint on centaur?
dont think they did extra chilling, not sure how RD-180 would react to that anyway.
iβd say the RD-180 would be pretty chill with it 
- they added STAR-48
The Atlas V only has 16 launches left
At this point any optimization effort should be focused on Vulcan anyway
oh yeah totally
ik this wonβt ever happen
it would just be something in concept
that wonβt actually happen
would be interesting to read about this, are there any decent resources beyond just wiki level stuff
id have to look for sources, I recall reading about this years ago 
best I can find atm
"In July 2003 NASA selected Atlas V 551 as the launch vehicle for the New
Horizons mission. Injected with several enhancements tailored specifically to the
New Horizons payload, the performance of the Atlas V 551 had been improved
significantly and an updated launch vehicle performance curve was provided by
NASA Kennedy Space Center."
prob more out there but would need some digging
though I guess there is a chance that specific quote is referring to the STAR-48B ig
https://x.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1798502162957218178? https://x.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1798504654738743305?
A5/Starliner CFT: Flight controllers have told the Starliner crew they are isolating the spacecraft's port helium manifold, the one known to have a small but persistent leak. Mission control to the crew: "No action on the caution message. To catch you back up, we're taking a look
A5/Starliner CFT: These exchanges came down about an hour ago; mission control just now told the crew they're still assessing; no indication yet on whether this is a real concern or simply precautionary; managers said before launch leak would have to dramatically increase to be
Damn it
Different ones apparently
https://x.com/nasaspaceflight/status/1798520862884180095?s=46&t=9j2-lzDcIbRK6McrWkEb9g
why did mike pence watch this on a fucking rotten potato
letβs jack up the saturation sure why not
this looks like the quality of a video someone would upload as proof that the moon landing was faked
nah thatβs more like noise reduction than grain
noise reduction softens the image
Oh yeah mb
TRUE
A5/Starliner CFT: Apologies for the delay updating; as it turns out, flight controllers have detected two additional helium leaks, one in "top" manifold 1 and the other in "port" manifold 1; that's in additional to the small leak in port manifold 2 that was known before launch; top manifold 1 and port manifold 1 have been isolated, taking 6 reac...
Guh
I know we shouldnβt joke about this because itβs serious butβ¦
https://x.com/Tygget/status/1798529814090928136
NASA warns that, due to helium leak on Starliner, there is growing concern within mission control that the crew will sound very silly when they dock to the ISS.
spacecraft propulsion is a ploy by big gas to increase thermosphere noble gas concentrations
holy fuck this is bad
@cbs_spacenews My friend might write a fake hit piece to try to short Boeing tomorrow morning . Thanks
(itβs someone being a silly goose)
also i love how john galt atlas shrugged replied to this π±
no like this is abort worthy i think ||/j||
Itβs to the point where I am genuinely worried for their safety
π i want to see this
itβs nbd atm
If the crew was told to get some rest while Houston figures it out
chances are that it isn't a big issue
surely theres enough redundancy π
Is the helium leak in the service module or the capsule?
service module?
why is starliner so leaky
why does butch have bandaids
I think itβs padding because the suit sucks and is uncomfortable or something
The @BoeingSpace #Starliner remains on track for a docking at 12:15pm ET today to the station despite helium leaks reported on the spacecraft. @NASA and Boeing will meet to review data prior to rendezvous and docking operations on the orbital outpost.
Mission managers met this morning and polled go for the @BoeingSpace #Starliner spacecraft to dock to the space station at 12:15pm ET today. They reveiewed the vehicle's status and continue monitoring manifold leak rates.
Meanwhile on Starliner: https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/1798690376879935787
Listening to Starliner communications this morning and hearing Butch Wilmore describe a noise they're hearing occasionally on the spacecraft, comparing it to the basement furnace from "A Christmas Story" (but without the cursing, he adds.)

Watch live as a crewed Boeing Starliner spacecraft docks to the International Space Station for the first time. Starliner will autonomously dock to the forward-facing port of the stationβs Harmony module at approximately 12:15 p.m. EDT (1615 UTC).
NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are aboard Starliner, which was launched on Wedne...
https://x.com/BoeingSpace/status/1798699578579144833
No-one's caring at the point
Following an NHPC1 burn, #Starliner is now on a path to align with @Space_Station.
Two NHPC burns help set the spacecraft up for favorable lighting and relative position conditions for final rendezvous, proximity operations and docking.
the stream for docking starts soon if anyone cares rn

Watch live as a crewed Boeing Starliner spacecraft docks to the International Space Station for the first time. Starliner will autonomously dock to the forwa...
somehow 9k viewers
a genuine miracle
Did I heard they lost one of the infrared cameras for rendezvous?
oh
Wtf Youtube didn't notify me that the stream started
whats the docking connect t-?
-90 min, 1615 GMT
I havenβt heard that
live starliner reaction
A5/Starliner CFT: A second reaction control system maneuvering jet has failed off; mission control has told Wilmore to hold at 260 meters from the station, the point where he had planned to test ship's manual control system. Instead, he's been asked to hold position at that point for hot fire tests that may get the jets back in operation
RIP
almost there
so some.thrusters are not working
Starliner can't avoid problems even after it finally gets to launch π
Poor program is cursed
Boeing Syndrome is such a terrible disease 
McDonnell Douglas Disease
S29 left flap
wait they're doing the manual demo now
oh
or they are gonna do it now
Starliner has 6 thrusters operational (zero fault tolerant), so can't enter the keepout sphere
lmfao
A5/Starliner CFT: Four jets apparently were deselected earlier because of suspect readings; two of them operated normally during the hot fire tests and are now considered useable as needed; flight controllers are still assessing the other two; Wilmore and Williams were cleared to press ahead with a manual flying demo before docking, but the comm...
I wonder even if they manage to get more thrusters back, it will be manual docking time with Butch
They can't enter on automated guidance but they can enter and dock on manual
ONLY 6
isnt that the bare minimum to keep full control
you have 6 degrees of freedom here right
im pretty sure starliner has more than 10 total thrusters
iirc 4 have had issues so far, theres certainly a good bit more than 6 operational unless im missing something
surely they have more π
They've already recovered 3 of the 4 and are working on getting the last one back
neat
yeah idk where the 6 came from lol
They could proceed fully on manual but automated approach is a flight test objective. They will continue to work towards that objective until they feel they cannot meet it
per this its 28, so loss of 4 is still 24 thrusters lol https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/01/nasa-and-boeing-are-closely-looking-at-starliners-thruster-performance/
Probably "currently zero fault tolerance 6 dof control", but that means 0 fault tolerance on 6 Degrees Of Freedom (3 x rotation & 3 x translation I guess) control
mm
right, thats probably just caused by whichever specific pairings failed meaning in some specific axis they no longer have enough redundancy
ah im stupid lol, 8 sounded low to me but I'm thinking of the LAEs I think
probably true
I guess I just did 8-2 
π
A5/Starliner CFT: Mission control has told the crew to hold off on entering the 200-meter-wide "keep out sphere," a protective zone around the space station; in a call to the crew, the CAPCOM said "here's the deal right now. We are zero fault tolerant for (not understandable) control, so we cannot technically get into the keep out sphere. Howeve...
One thing is sure, we don't wanna a Soyuz-10/15/23/25/33/T-8 situation happening here with mission team scrambling to get the crew back without docking, that could be an almost fatal-blow to the Starliner program.
A5/Starliner CFT: NASA has waved off the crew's first docking opportunity and is now setting up for a backup at 1:33pm EDT (1733 UTC)
Another hot fire to test thrusters and try to get more back up, but apparently the spacecraft is ready to dock for the next window, for now.
plot twist: they abort the docking 
NASA now says they are comfortable with Starliner's RCS thrusters to be able to proceed inside the space station's "keep out sphere." The next docking window opens at 1:33 p.m. ET.
B1A3 is a problem child
Looks like they cleared another one back on, one will be locked down & inhibited
bro sounds like he's dying π
Inside the keep out sphere now
Are they keeping manual control or is Starliner back to auto?
Semi-auto then
its in a quantum superposition
its auto and manual until it docks to the ISS
obviously a bloch sphere over here
Was just about to say that π
its all a giant RSS Principia save
lmao
WHAT lol
oh wait they have the nadir cam
https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/ESRS/HDEV/ maybe ill just watch this instead
AAAA π
In a hold for lighting conditions
Starliner is operating autonomously
Approaching 10m hold
Holding at 10m. Expecting 6 minute hold until lighting is good for docking
Expecting 47 minutes of margin in this docking window
12:30 CDT docking time looks like
A little under 6 minutes until lighting, then configuring NDS for docking, then final approach and soft capture
The one flight during which I had important course group work
...
And than it actually goes and now docks
cozy
All go
Go for final approach
Ah good
current state of affaris
moving quite fast
Soft capture!
eyy
soft cap
docked
Contact and capture
i can finally breathe fully
SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN YOU SAY
ABOVE THE INDIAN OCEAN?? maybe S29 was able to see it
They did it at 12:34 pm
if it wasnβt underwater you say
indian ocean coming in clutch for spaceflight
ong
after how many holes it acquired today?
boats tend to not survive reentry very well
π€«π€«π€« we dont talk about that
says you and what data π€
alright will do
real
the day before demo 2 flew SN4 blew up
the day starliner docks to the iss for the first time starship goes orbital and comes back in one piece adjacent condition
what happens when dreamchaser goes up
Not orbital
transatmospheric then
do you mean dream chaser
because the dreamliner is a commercial airplane and i don't think that thing is going trans atmospheric
LOL
you just never know...
https://vxtwitter.com/ulalaunch/status/1798783965450604766
We didnβt got to see this yesterdayβ¦
Welcome to the International Space Station Butch and @Astro_Suni! β¨
Let's take a look back at #Starliner separation from Centaur yesterday. https://t.co/m3uvWGKdeS
π 21 π 5
ingress
spingle




Crew Dragon Tomboy
Plsno
do you know what..... porn is/
it was a joke π
Itβs probably in the pdf too π
Canβt believe that actually exists btw
cool picture
starliner ain't him
starliner looks like it was taken with an older camera
dragon 2 looks more modern
even the way the earth looks on the cams
(speaking of, what causes the difference between the two with the atmosphere-horizon boundary, on one it looks solid, on the other it looks like a gradient)
location?
second one looks like it's over an ocean, first is land and ocean
or maybe it just does that sometimes
Could be
WAKE UP BABE
ULA LAUNCH HIGHLIGHTS ARE OUT
https://youtu.be/FqzeCD31SUU
For the first time in history, a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V carrying NASA astronauts aboard Boeingβs CST-100 Starliner lifted off on June 5, 2024 at 10:52 a.m. EDT from Space Launch Complex-41 (SLC-41) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida. The launch of NASA astronauts Barry βButchβ Wilmore and Sunita βSuniβ Williams marks th...

Fyi Neil isn't a Boeing employee
the first one has more exposure
you can see how the white looks a lot less blown out in the one with dragon
Still funny but yeah lol
Aha I was right!
Glad to know someone who knows about photography agrees with me
Surely this makes me an expert in the subject (the only camera I own is on my phone)
lmao
They regularly will put events like the Superbowl up on the main screen in the FCR's so people can watch during ops
i mean i learned a lot of photography with my phone before i had a camera so
wait was starship up?
No a couple console positions watched the launch streams on laptops since it was before the docking windows opened
ah that makes more sense
so how's CFT going now?
...functional? it should not be having continuous problems still but hey so far haven't put anyone at risk
lmfao
Rooting for LoM with two human beings onboard? That's disgusting and reprehensible
acceptable when it's Boeing I guess
lmao that's interesting, I assume that's a plugin? I didn't even know that's possible
yeah I'm on 126.21, the last functional kotlin client
Lmaooo
oh hey one of you dipshits sent a screenshot of here in artemis and fucking max twang got it lmaooo https://fxtwitter.com/kmh/status/1799153908406726674
again I must make the distinction, LOM with crew safe is greatly preferable to a LOCV down the line

oh and SG5 is in his replies lmao the echochamber is alive and well I see https://fxtwitter.com/Spaceguy5/status/1799155876135104520
I feel like these guys care more about complaining about space flight then they do space flight
Also twitter is hell dont pay attention
spitter is either the best thing ever or objectively the worst simultaneously
oi @onyx brook go fuck yourself
Sis why do you even wish for LoM
Are statements like this not against the rules?
a LOM would result in someone with a brain looking over the program, which would hopefully avert a future LOCV
I don't wish for the death of anyone obviously
a LOM is safe for the crew, whereas a LOCV is not
^^^^
While the starliner is a death trap and shouldnβt fly you shouldnβt have wished for lom @harsh junco
That is not true at all
A LOM can result in severe injury
A LOCV just means death
it can, but that's not what I wish for
well maybe specify that before wishing for it
Why do you think people havent look at the program?
in good health, on the ground and free of starliner
Why do you think starliner is a deathtrap
This still doesnβt change the fact that the statement does cross the line
McDonnell Douglas

Hypergolic propellant ring a bell?
F-15 is based
Dragon is also hypergolic lol
You realize every crew vehicle uses hypergolic propellent
Hypergols aren't my favorite, maybe one day we'll switch to nitrous stuff universally
true but some concerns with Starliner abort scenarios and landing next to the hypergols
not gud
Dragon and every other vehicle using them would have the same concerns
bigger concerns
You wouldnβt be landing next to the hypergols in an actual abort scenario
In an abort scenario the SM would splash down in the ocean likely further away
well, the capsule still has its own RCS, no?
not that it's really that big of a risk
ASTP is the only thing I can think of
even then the ASTP fiasco was human error
the what
π§
I canβt understand why everyone canβt just celebrate in the success of CFT so far
it's good (apart from thruster failures), and it adds a new way for crew to get to the station, but it has some problems
and the program as a whole is a bit naff
The Apollo side of Apollo-Soyuz did a thing upon landing where a bunch of hypergolic RCS fumes nearly killed the astronauts
WHAT
uh yeah
Brand left a swicth on (or off i can't remember), and he also passed out because of the fumes
so uh
yeah
the guys were hospitalized for a few weeks iirc
omw to wikipedia
The Space Above Us is my favorite podcast ever
Artemis?
LMAO
james holt is a sad, pathetic man lol
Also whatβs a LOM
loss of mission (crew live, cannot complete original mission due to some issue)
vs LOCV (loss of crew and vehicle)
What is this
hellish discord server
sg5 and lavie run that shit, should tell you all you need to know
They donβt run it
they moderate it, same difference
Sounds funβ¦
except their idea of moderation is banning anyone with a brain lol
Are they pro-new space or no
LOL
can we please not trash talk ppl ππ
they literally created a whole discord server around the fucking artemis program
you tell me
Iβm just trying to get a read on the opinions of the place
basically take tim and then amp it up like 1000000000000x
π
Thatβs not true at all
yall.
They didnβt create it
you know what I meant lol
I donβt know what you meant
the server is more or less an oldspace circlejerk
argue about this somewhere else that isnβt this server
there you go
itβs not?
at any rate I have to go do something productive so tell sg5 and lavie to eat rocks or something for me please buh bye
yeah no Iβm not gonna be a dick to people because they have differing opinions on spaceflight π
Sorry youβre not a ghost, but I will not tolerate people being aggressive to ppl I know and being a mean person in general
i was mostly pointing that at miranda but yeah
I don't have a twitter and I'm not in very many servers but it's shocking how much of the "space community" is just people with personal vendettas against each other
Also respond to my question in #moderation please thanks
Yeah thatβs basically just space Twitter in a nutshell
People like arguing a lot more than they like space lol
All the time spent arguing could actually be used contributing to space
Well there's basically no actual professionals in the industry who frequent these places
That is the majority of Space Twitter
the most professional people who frequent it are interns
maybe one or three engineers at private companies
Space Twitter is essentially pure infighting, most of which have to do with basic choices that were made forever ago that people refuse to not complain about
Sometimes someone with an objectively stupid opinion waltzes in and says something stupid and then acts as if they're some sort of martyr against the "mindless masses". In that case everyone comes together to clown on them, laugh about clowning on them, and then get right back to infighting about basic details
I hate this misconception that everything has to be professional and friendly tbh
it doesn't have to be professional, that wasn't what I was implying
was just saying that for the record
kinda prefer majority amateur like this, encourages specualtion and debate
but Twitter really stretches the term "debate."
most of it is someone saying something of varying levels of stupidity, some other person says "typical x fan. you're so dumb because you chose to ignore xyz" or "quit meatriding x" or something of that nature and gets a bajillion updoots
is that a debate, or just
uh
tossing insults or snarky one liners and getting your oh-so-precious gotcha moment
plus since a certain guy is a central figure in the community, the diehards from his posse have kinda merged in with the spitter community, which has made everything objectively more toxic than it has been literally ever
calm with the edits dawg
no i hate typos and i hate them more when im being serious about something
because the last thing i want is to bring up a serious topic and then someone completely ignores what i said and then be like "haha minor spelling mistake"
haha serious amount of edits

anwyays have the 'nauts called down to the White House yet
apparently they were set to
https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-crew-flight-test-astronauts-to-call-white-house-nasa-leaders/
huh? That server was made for SLS not Artemis, Artemis includes a lot more than that
nitrous is probably too low performance to bother with tbh
now, peroxideβ¦
It was made for Artemis
We made the server when the 2024 goal was created
maybe Iβm thinking of a different server then
There was some server that was made for SLS and related things and then got renamed to Artemis when Artemis showed up
We had a group chat for that
Hm, so maybe? I donβt know, but all this also tells me you need better friends
Unless the moderation there is an entirely different crowd than your βweβ that is
Itβs a different group of people who are no longer as active
ok, thatβs better then, mb
https://starlinerupdates.com/starliner-flight-day-2-activities/
Light day on the starliner side of things, as expected
Do some of yall not just get
tired?
I don't even participate in these arguments and even I feel burnt out
??????????????
This is certainly a chat rn
And yeah please don't fucking openly root for crewed missions to fail, even in a non-lethal manner, just because you have a vendetta against the company/program in question
I mean seriously, I normally am fine with you Miranda and I've probably cut you more slack than a lot of people here, but come the fuck on
If you need me to reinforce the point with an analogy then you shouldn't even root for non-lethal LOM on, for example, Virgin Galactic flights, where the argument that it could prevent an inevitable LOCV later might actually hold some water
PREACH
Rooting for a failure of any mission isnβt something Iβm ok with, crewed or not
But itβs especially terrible with crewed
The only ones I'm okay with rooting against are uncrewed solely military missions
For example Polyus
Yeah ASAT shit should fail
This TBH
I try not to participate but sometimes I fail
me too... 
I do agree with this
i root against all NK space launches 
I root against all NK icbm launches, but not their orbital launches
God I wish NK could do a single thing in good faith...
I can only see them start doing science missions if it either has military applications or to compete with SK's space program when they start doing more
i root against all unmanned launches, we should stop giving the bots missiles to play with
who knows what theyll pull one of these days
I hope they pull out
afaik it's satire and nobody should take it seriously (I'm spreading misinformation)
Wtf happened in here π
I get rooting for more review of Starliner cos the vibes have been off for a while but it's also undergone a lot already and some very good engineers have seen the issues and are working through solutions. But rooting for LOM is wild and nasty
Looks like Starliner has a smaller inner volume than Crew Dragon?
That and the "Boeing aircraft style many-buttons/switches" cockpit certainly makes Starliner looks quite a bit more crowded
Live from the International Space Station: Watch a tour of the Boeing Starliner with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, the first crew to fly on the spacecraft.
Wilmore and Williams arrived at the station aboard Starliner on Thursday, June 6, one day after the spacecraft was launched on a ULA (United Launch Alliance) Atlas V rock...
(for comparison, Dragon Crew-1 with similar amount of bags)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT6BC68UzeY
NASA astronauts Victor Glover, Michael Hopkins, Shannon Walker and JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Soichi Noguchi take viewers on a tour of the SpaceX Crew Dragon Resilience spacecraft that will take them to their new home on orbit.
The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Crew Dragon spacecraft successfully launched from Kennedy Spac...
Starliner is absolutely packed with cargo right now which is making it look smaller
the control stuff looks soo much more cool than stupid touchpad dragon
No it doesn't bruh
physical buttons >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> booring touchscreen
Mmmmm tactile controls....
click clack and beep boop is superior and it isn't even by a close margin
^
Looks like Starliner is returning on June 14th landing on Wilcox, Arizona at around 6:30AM local time
Another landing opportunity seems to be available for Utah on the following day at around 1PM local
It's gonna be very weird seeing an American crew capsule land on land
I mean weβve seen it twice without crew
True but still
Welp, delayed till the 18th https://x.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1799893301430022244
Starliner CFT: Flight controllers have told the Starliner crew their undocking and return to Earth is moving from June 14 to June 18 to provide separation for an already planned spacewalk by ISS astronauts Tracy Dyson and Matt Dominick on June 13. NASA will hold a briefing to
The good news is that there'll be an EVA while Starliner is docked
So they can take a shot of both Dragon and Starliner with the spacewalkers in view
Like this one from Bob Behnken
OK. Here's one. #CFT
OK. Here's one. #CFT
OK. Here's one. #CFT
OK. Here's one. #CFT
Ok. Here's one. #CFT
Ok. Here's one. #CFT
Ok. Here's one. #CFT
https://starlinerupdates.com/starliner-flight-day-6-activities/
All docked flight test objectives complete
5 leaks now
1st was found on the ground, 2nd and 3rd during coast, 4th and now 5th found while docked
Guh
All starliner and no atlas V news makes Marcus a dull boy
Lmfao
So are they gonna have to do another investigation?
Google during io time
Remember when everyone made fun of SLS scrubbing because of hydrogen leaks?
Pepperidge Farm remembers
ill be perfectly honest, with the performance of this capsule, if i were one of the crew, i would ask for an empty crew dragon capsule to head up to the station to pick me up and for the Starliner capsule to be left to reenter unmanned, maybe its just from what we've seen so far, but with so many leaks and issues with engines, i wouldnt trust the capsule to be safe.
None of the issues have been safety threatening
stuck RCS thrusters could cause issues if they get stuck on when orienting for reentry
if the RCS is stuck off, then the helium leaks could cause problems by throwing the vehicle off-angle
i really hope for the crew's safe return, but i think that this mission shows that there is still a lot of work to be done on starliner before it becomes a routine transport system.
The thrusters on the capsule themselves can account for it
And the SM has so many redundant thrusters
although I wouldn't call Starliner "unsafe," I do think that she has a couple things t'be worked out
but it is cool to see the capusle in action and aside from the helium issues it works like a dream
Remember that Dragon literally blew itself up before Demo 2
(true.)
Having issues before operational flights shouldnβt be unexpected
And Demo 2 had its fair share of little issues
in a ground test on an old capsule in a configuration that would only happen in a ground test 
it still blew up
good lol
?
massive massive difference between issues on the ground and in the air
I can't quite remember what these are
yeah me neither
then again i doubt any faults would've received a lot of widespread coverage considering that Demo-2 was very much a matter of national pride
It was minor issues
ah
I did say little
also, it's been 4 years, memory goes brrrrr
@torybruno Hi @torybruno! what would happen to Starliner after Altas V Retirement? (SpaceX Crew Dragon Did 46 Flights.) and Starliner being crew rated now means it needs do more a good amount of flights before retirement
why tf do you even need to mention SpX and Crew Dragon (e.g. V2) didn't do 46 flights π
(Energia Buran Did 34 Flights)
(real)
(SLS did 12,000 flights)
(Soyuz did 57,000,000,000 flights)
(Starship did -12 flight)
(Shenzhou did yes flights)
I think they ment dragon in general
ye obv but that's still a weird take
and V1 was so different π
wake up babe, new starliner gif
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1179582303354224773/1250798343370702979/yls78cvp146d1.gif
Lmao
The fact that that number might actually become true on a single flight lmao
starliner can get itβs own topical gif ten times
When you realise starship flew more times than starliner is just
Starliner was on orbit twice at least 
Also, these are two goddamit different vehicles with different purposes
Literally like comparing Sputnik-1 to Apollo LM or whatever
Hubble only flew once and starship has flown 4 times checkmate liberals
Big Number Better
Chang'e 6 has only landed once, falcon 9 has landed 300 times
The space shuttle flew 133 times successfully, the N-1 flew 4 times unsuccessfully
Checkmate soviets
Thor able flew more times than N1, checkmate soviets
the UK had more (currently visible) flags on the moon than the US between 1972 and 2024, checkmate americans
(the others have been bleached, the union jack was etched into a solar panel that an engineer from nottingham worked on)
The intuitive machines lander has like 4 American flags on it
And while tipped over, it is in one piece
okay, so from 1972-the landing of the IM lander, this was the case

