#Artemis I Mission
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
(not in space or integrated into the capsule)
If it's "just ISS derived tech" it should've been super easy to include in the capsule
just dock it to the iss 🙂
It is, it'd just cost more for nothing
And NASA sadly need to cut costs
the LAS has had flight tests girl
read. the. whole. message.
literally no point
Isolated test flights in a controlled manner ≠ real life
plus a lot of ECLSS stuff involves refreshing air
Apparently the reason is for dealing with a flat budget the ECLSS might have been too expensive to fly on A1.
and it’s kinda hard for humans to suck in ox and blow out co2 without ppl
not that it’s a good reason or optimal for safety but it’s the reason
yeah but it’s not hard for machines to do that lol
so you want them to blow an SLS?
but there’s not much of a point
it’s not like this is NASA’s first ECLSS rodeo
Ideally yes but it’s unfortunately not practical to do so.
well, besides proving that part of the system works in its intended operating environment of course
money. if it’s not gonna be used, why have it?
every part that hasn’t been tested and can be tested is being tested
in isolation yes
Wellllll, when you put it that way.... ||(I'm like 80% joking here)||
No. I want the systems in place to prove that IF it were to blow up, the people on top would live. What are the odds that a mistaken / unnecessary abort trigger happens? And even if it does happen, wouldn't you rather it happen on an inconsequential mission instead of, say, the first landing mission, fucking everything up (HLS can't loiter 2+ years for the next SLS)
the Orion ECLSS system is being tested on ISS
money was such a big issue when it came to Artemis Program spending
hence why their budget was so high lmao
they’re going to cut costs where they can
idk what to tell ya
AA-2 literally proved the system
the abort system on top of SLS functions the same as it did on AA-2
there is literally no reason to waste a core
https://video.ibm.com/channel/b4dEcL3bJKW
Live feed from panel cams
NASA Artemis I Live
This is a live, low-resolution video feed from cameras on NASA’s Orion spacecraft as it accomplishes the Artemis I mission. Viewers will see the Artemis logo or the last frame of good video data if the spacecraft is out of range of its communications network. Viewers may see what appears to be a black screen when the vehicle ...
yooo, this is sick
I love the solar panel cams
I agree
However there is also no reason not to include a full live LAS
And don't give me "cost" or "accidental/unnecessary abort risk" BS
The cost is insignificant compared to everything else, an unnecessary abort would be far better on A1 than future missions
There is no good reason
only downside is needing abort whether to be good
but ig they dont need to recover the capsule
would probs be a bad idea to not
unless they just didn't deploy parachutes
even then would it even do much or would it just get crushed
not like preparing for an abort would be a bad idea
"unnecessary abort risk" meaning an abort is possible
meaning that you either destroy capsule and booster or get to test out the LAS
No, no, logic is not allowed!
Unacceptable
ARTEMIS I 24/7 LIVESTREAM
https://video.ibm.com/channel/b4dEcL3bJKW
NASA Artemis I Live
This is a live, low-resolution video feed from cameras on NASA’s Orion spacecraft as it accomplishes the Artemis I mission. Viewers will see the Artemis logo or the last frame of good video data if the spacecraft is out of range of its communications network. Viewers may see what appears to be a black screen when the vehicle ...
weird how its not on YT
How many times do we need to pin it? 
Lol
Moon
I only left mine because it had a title, I mean, it explained that it was the link.
From Orion?
Yep
tineye rarely fails me
I thought it was weird, I didn't see that picture today or on NASA's web pages.
{{ngMeta.description}}
Yes, I looked for it there, but it hasn't been uploaded yet.
The last ones that were uploaded this morning were the Falcon 9 CRS-26.
I
Here is a better link https://images.nasa.gov/details-art001e000274
{{ngMeta.description}}
avg a1 cubesat
The mission is not yet lost, but it can no longer be done as planned, if the current problem is solved, the mission will be able to do a lot of science, important science to detect the water on the moon.
Uh-oh, problems with Artemis?
main mission is fine
just the cubesats are being a pain but that was to be expected
High risk high reward
Sats from Orion payload?
Sorry for typing so slowly - Keyboard enhancement software doesn't work in Discord so I have to hunt and peck, but if that means I get to hang with you guys every day, I don't mind 
wonderful
I think once you get accustomed to hanging out with us you might change your mind lol
we aren't the most mature to say the least
Nah - not a chance - Who else am I gonna talk about space stuff, cows, and bacon with?! 😆
hahaha
I posted some stuff about Cerebral Palsy in #off-topic for you guys to read later if you're interested.
Wait so NASA didn't fix the Ares-1x destroying the pad issue for Artemis 1?
they aren't really comparable
and no the pad isn't destroyed
a few doors blown in and a sandblasted paint scheme
Ah just saw it was damaged and wa surprised after the Ares incident
well comparing the two incidents was weird
one is because most powerful SRBs ever made and they didn't know what to actually expect
and the other is just why
There's a lot more damage than this tho
The point here is that the damage, though more than expected, is of no concern since it didn't affect the launch itself and they have well enough time to repair it for the next launch
yeah
anyways, mission is almost a 3rd of the way complete
can't imagine what its like to be getting all that lovely data
Was Ares more damage
What region of the moon is this?
@NASAArtemis @JAXA_en This was taken at 5:05 p.m. on Nov. 21 UTC during the lunar flyby (5550km).
We confirmed that it was taken in the area around 15°N, 120°E on the far side of the Moon.
The simulation shows that it was captured as we had intended and matches well with the past Moon images.
Thx
CUM (Clean Up Maneuver) after the lunar flyby was performed as planned.
Based on the orbit determination results after DV1 and TCM so far, we expect that we have achieved fairly precise control. We will wait for the orbit determination results after the subsequent passes.

...
Someone has to fire the intern who manages the account
CUM maneuver, did no one think that through when saying that
It’s just CUM, the M is for manuever
There should be a list of twitter intern space fails
nah they knew what was up, this gets a lot more publicity
someone is shitting bricks
Support my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/adriangraycomedy
Amid decreasing interest in space travel, NASA took desperate measures to add to the entertainment of the final Apollo mission in 1972.
@rocky basin this
This is what twitter intern did
soothes the soul fr fr
there's no way
wow, that must be hurtful
This is why we test. Overnight, we unexpectedly lost communication with @NASA_Orion while reconfiguring the link between the spacecraft and the Deep Space Network. We've since restored the link with an adjustment on the ground and are examining root cause. https://t.co/F4hzPfZ4Ra
534
This is why we test.
♫ We do what we must, because we can. ♫
LET'S GOOOOO
I'm gonna perform CUM in this chat-forum


unlegal
oh my
Is this correct?
i have no idea about that
It does have autonomous flight control but I don’t know to that degree
ty!
When will the astronauts for future Artemis mission be announced?
So what happened to the ITAR bullshit then
Anddddd
Following NASA’s successful Artemis I launch from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Nov. 16, 2022, teams with the Exploration Ground Systems conducted a post-launch assessment for the ground systems, which began the day of launch and concluded Friday, Nov. 18. This enabled teams to inspect areas on the mobile launcher and identify specific damage and debris around the pad. Engineers have determined the overall mobile launcher and pad systems performed as designed during launch and are structurally sound.
After Orion comes home
Those pics make me worried for starship lmao
Starship is what, just under/ around 2x SLS power
well, thrust anyway
but it would be probably just as fine if they properly designed the GSE to handle it
IF
Approximately 1.89 SLS
33 R2.5 will be 2.06 SLS
Yes
Dev engines, yeah
250 metric tons is the goal if I remember correctly
bruh
Yeah
Per Alex they've been having trouble pushing the thrust/chamber pressure
B12 was supposed to get R2.5 but instead it's getting R2.1
I assumed that would be an issue
R2/R2.1 are already impressive as hell, to be expected tbh
R2 can already do 250mt... Just not for very long 
They’ll figure it out, they always do
Yeah, for sure
Some more SpaceX voodoo
I want dry mass figures for R2.1 and 2.5, I wonder how it compares to 2.0's 1550kg
And the new shielding for B9+
That needs an environmental impact review
SLS didn't
B12 will still get updated raptors but not sure what is being updated
I guess I'll find out once closer
The raptors
I... What the hell is there to upgrade
Dry mass savings or reduced shielding maybe? I doubt they do much to the powerhead until 2.5?
As of Wednesday, Nov. 23, a total of about 3,971 pounds of propellant has been used, about 147 pounds less than prelaunch expected values. There is more than 2,000 pounds of margin available over what is planned for use during the mission, an increase of about 74 pounds from prelaunch expected values.
Very Good
maybe increased shielding
Orion is one of the most heavily automated spacecraft out there. That said, I'm not on the flight-side of things, so I'm not sure to what extent.
Now I just need a shot of CS separation to finish the edit lol
https://fxtwitter.com/chancebelloise/status/1595572555896672256
Artemis I, go for free bird 🚀
The only thing I see whenever I hear that song
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
FINALLY A FREE BIRD EDIT
amazing
Yeeeeeeet! 🚀
This video shows @NASA_Orion’s launch abort system (LAS), built by our engineers, being jettisoned following the successful launch of @NASA_SLS!
🤯
204
YO
THATS FUCKIN SICK
Yeeeeeeeeet - Lockheed Martin 2022
I want one Artemis mission to go to the Far Side and another to go Tarus-Littrow
you can tell the rocket is accelerating because that launch escape system is barely moving away
Has there ever been a "space Archeology" mission?
A mission designed to study or retrieve leftovers of a previous mission?
Kinda?
Ancient leftovers
Apollo 12 can be considered that but the age difference between the two missions isn’t much
That the engineers didn't intend to send a mission to study them
I guess it's kinda right
What's the status of the Apollo landing sites?
I mean
They're outside of US Territory
Are they protected?
Well obviously
can't wait to inspect those sites
I hope so as imagine if in the future some stupid space tourist decides to ruin the first steps by Neil Armstrong
Vanguard 1 is the oldest object still in orbit
Iirc Apollo sites are UN heritage sites
Perhaps you could rendezvous a tourist Spacecraft mission there to just observe it
Actually nah it’s a US heritage site but not UN
The Artemis accords have protections for them iirc
Spending Thanksgiving orbiting the Moon? No problem! The SLS rocket is capable of carrying 112,000 pumpkin pies into space. Happy Thanksgiving from the #NASASLS team!
346
New Fotage:
Views of Moon from Orion:
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/video/ART-SAW4_2022_327_0350_SHARED_art001m1203270350/ART-SAW4_2022_327_0350_SHARED_art001m1203270350~orig.MP4
What off earth is that sound
(see what I did there)
extra-terrestrial communications
in reality
probably data
wonder if it's decodable

timezone?
When is it launching
We Are Going!
We went
2017
ORBIT 2017 !
We are there!
Orion's got a wild pattern
At 4:52 p.m. EST (21:52 UTC), the Orion spacecraft will perform a burn burn to enter a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon, an orbit that is high altitude from the surface of the Moon and opposite the direction of the Moon travels around Earth. Live coverage will begin at 4:30 p.m. EST (21:30 UTC).
At 1:47 a.m. EST (6:47 UTC) on November 1...
Next Live Stream
chopped moon
Check out this view of the auxiliary engines on board the Orion service module firing during the OTC-6 burn a little while ago! OTC burns are needed to account for trajectory dispersions. #Artemis1
Experience the sounds of NASA's Artemis 1 rocket launch and see what it’s like to witness the first SLS liftoff up close! Grab some headphones, it really makes a difference.
Proper 21:9 version for ultrawide viewing here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goYN4SIhyzE
We've collected our favorite audio moments from our cameras and microphones p...
oh my fucking god
New Images....
Ok
erz
Zak, don't open PS next time for your own safety and sanity of followers 
Tbh it's really not that bad
Better than nothing
fair tho
At 4:52 p.m. EST (21:52 UTC), the Orion spacecraft will perform a burn burn to enter a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon, an orbit that is high altitude from the surface of the Moon and opposite the direction of the Moon travels around Earth. Live coverage will begin at 4:30 p.m. EST (21:30 UTC).
At 1:47 a.m. EST (6:47 UTC) on November 1...
Red Bull Time

PS: He won't sleep tonight, he drank almost everything in one gulp.
Lin
Choose your fighter:
AnatootanA
kaZ ylly Zak
I don't remember posting this
On Saturday, Nov. 26, Orion spacecraft will break the record for farthest distance traveled by a spacecraft designed to carry humans to space and safely return them to Earth. This distance is currently held by the Apollo 13 spacecraft at 248,655 miles (400,171 km) from Earth. Orion was specifically designed for missions to carry humans farther into space than ever before.
No idea how NASA made this mistake in an official video, that’s hella embarrassing
Walt Cunningham’s only flight was Apollo 7
Bruh
oof
I mean
It's just a typo
Give the media intern a break, they're probably overworked and doing it just because they want a shot to work with NASA
They should be friends with the intern that wrote "CUM"
Agreed, doesn't make it any less of an embarrassing mistake
"Expect perfection in everything and you will only be left with disappointment"

Nothing's stopping you from making a metric version 🤷♂️
I'll do it later
we got to Moon in imperial stfu
Cringe units
NASA does all their engineering in metric nowadays just a lot of the infographics they put out are in imperial because that's what most of the US population understands
Goalpost maneuvering
you’d be partly wrong lmao
A lot of engineering work for SLS-Orion was done in imperial/metric mix
You post frequently on SLS subreddit
Im literally a mod on it
You left a comment on a post from r/space 47 days ago
The infographics could be badly converted and we'd never know 🙂
Your twitter is CR15PY#0435bacon
doxxed wth
Your location is 580 College St, Jacksonville, FL 32204, USA
i never knew someone could be so off with where I live

You’ve off by roughly 1,000 miles
i hope his pet is okay 🙏🙏
Ok so You're somewhere in the east coast
or middle of the US
i get maryland vibes
It is composed of several layers
So are astronauts
joeben

Artemis I Live 24/7
https://video.ibm.com/channel/b4dEcL3bJKW
NASA Artemis I Live
This is a live, low-resolution video feed from cameras on NASA’s Orion spacecraft as it accomplishes the Artemis I mission. Viewers will see the Artemis logo or the last frame of good video data if the spacecraft is out of range of its communications network. Viewers may see what appears to be a black screen when the vehicle ...
This is a live, low-resolution video feed from cameras on NASA’s Orion spacecraft as it accomplishes the Artemis I mission around the Moon and back to Earth. Splashdown is expected on Dec. 11, 2022.
Viewers will see the Artemis logo, or the last frame of good video data, if there is a loss of signal, or if the bandwidth is needed for mission ac...
Anyone have the server banner image in high res?
There's everything you need on JSC's Flickr page
art001e000268 Nov 21 2022 A portion of the far side of the Moon looms large just beyond the Orion spacecraft in this image taken on the sixth day of the Artemis I mission by a camera on the tip of one of Orion s solar arrays The spacecraft entered the lunar sphere of influence Sunday Nov 20 making the Moon instead of Earth the main gra...
How do I download the images, there's no button and it doesn't let me do the right click thing on mobile
Not from the cell phone, I'll pass you the link from where I downloaded it.
Thanks
Thanks
No problem
You can, there's a button right there that lets you download the image at original resolution (4000x3000)
Not there on mobile
But that's from a computer
ohhh
From a mibile, the only way is to first download the Flickr app.
Pain
You can just select the browser option to view the site as desktop.
Works on other mobile browsers too.
Not sure why you’re not able to download from the images site on mobile, though. I’ve never had trouble doing that.
I tried before but it wouldn't let me
Oh weird
BREAKING NEWS: The @NASAArtemis #Orion spacecraft has been imaged minutes ago via our telescopes, while it orbits around the Moon. @NASAMoon
🔭🛰️🚀
https://t.co/TzuYJSyKgb
Artemis I has launched !
Any time you fly to the Moon, it's a celebration. Over the weekend, we put on a show for @NASA_Orion's purposeful passengers using our #Callisto tech demo! 🎉🥳
@alexa99, party mode!
Bonus: Sound on to hear the ambience of Orion's interior as it travels in deep space. 🔊
Just as the moon was about to cover the Earth, the solar panels moved and the "eclipse" is no longer visible.
At least a part of it is serious, now to edit it so that it can be seen in fast motion.
literally 1984
Imágenes de la nave Orion de la misión Artemis I de la NASA donde podemos ver como la Luna se superpone con la Tierra. Esta nave ahora se ha convertido en la nave diseñada para humanos que más lejos ha viajado de la Tierra superando a la nave Apollo 13.
I almost didn't finish editing it but here it is, the timelapse where you can see most of the "eclipse".
like me
NASA will host a news conference from NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston to discuss the status of the uncrewed Artemis I flight test as the Orion spacecraft reaches the mid-point of its Moon mission, and its farthest distance from Earth at nearly 270,000 miles away.
Orion entered a distant lunar orbit on at 4:52 p.m. EST (21:52 UTC) Nov. 25...
NASA says the 47-minute loss of communications with Orion last week was a ground configuration issue.
Pam Melroy is the Deputy Administrator of NASA and Robert D. Cabana was director of KSC until last year, so I'd guess this is probably some kind of self-congratulatory symbolic patch for the Artemis program in general, rather than Bill Nelson being insane enough to assign himself to a flight.
Yes that's what I just said
Because people in the replies were acting like it was possibly an actual mission patch
Sorry if you’ve seen me do this before, but I read the “blood and money” Wayne hale blogpost and it’s got me in a mood
if the risk of Artemis is realised - and I understand great care is put into trying to stop it, but if it is - and blood is spilt in its name, are we ready to fix the problem and continue? Or have we not communicated the risks well, and such a thing would cause the public to lose their taste for exploration?
I hope the former, but I’m not convinced we’re ready.
cryinf
it’s pretty impossible to not have the public say oh shit and associate x space program with dead astronaut in their mind if something blows
Yes, but they if they understand it’s a possibility before it happens they’ll be less likely to demand it be shut down because they didn’t know it wasn’t totally safe.
i think basically every mission has the “it’s a possibility” deal
but i see your point
To be honest I think the big problem with Artemis on this front is that not a lot of people are closely following it at all right now, but I expect that to change by Artemis III or so. If you ask like half of the US what they think of it they'll say "we have a Moon program?" If lots of people are glued to the TV watching launches and landings and one fails then they'll say "fuck... well, they knew what they were getting into" having already internalized the possibility themselves. If someone sees that an Artemis mission killed someone the next morning on the news and didn't even know it was happening they'll be a lot more jarred by it and much less sympathetic to the space program afterwards.
idrk what else nasa can do lol
Can HLS abort a landing if needed?
Yeah, of course
Artemia I 24/7 now on YT
Didn't they also make a mistake with the amount of engines on the S-II in the How We Are Going to the Moon video
Yeah, S-II should have 5 for a total of 11.
I... How the hell is this mistake made
When i first saw it i thought i was wrong about the S-II having 5 engine because like how even does someone mess that up
I mean i just looked up "s-ii stage" and i see like 7 different pictures when you can clearly see it has 5 engines
Long sls
long
Mum just asked me if I'd heard about the onion spacecraft
What did you say
He is the onion Spacecraft
"tf are you talking about"
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/52532192756/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/52532192641/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/52532665350/
art001e001450 (Nov. 27, 2022) On flight day 12, the inside of Orion shows the display of the Callisto payload. Callisto is Lockheed Martin’s technology demonstration in collaboration with Amazon and Cisco, testing voice-activated and video technology that may assist future astronauts on deep space missions.
art001e001451 (Nov. 27, 2022) On flight day 12, the inside of Orion shows the display of the Callisto payload. Callisto is Lockheed Martin’s technology demonstration in collaboration with Amazon and Cisco, testing voice-activated and video technology that may assist future astronauts on deep space missions.
art001e001449 (Nov. 27, 2022) On flight day 12, the inside of Orion shows the display of the Callisto payload. Callisto is Lockheed Martin’s technology demonstration in collaboration with Amazon and Cisco, testing voice-activated and video technology that may assist future astronauts on deep space missions.
yellow Orion looks comfy
the colorful RGB lighting is appealing to me (I'm a zoomer ) \
Experience the Artemis I launch from the engine ignition to Orion's separation on it's journey to the Moon.
new camera views
Falcon 9 (real)
I have news
Let us hear it
Artemis I has launched !
OMG!
WTF
Unbelievable
It is safe with me
Will do
Decent Video
Orion Sees the Moon and Saturn
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/video/Moon and Saturn/Moon and Saturn~orig.mp4
Is this real 😱
Real photo
It's real. I hot it straight from NASA's website
I can't believe it
Starship got there first though
Magic engines
Finally, Orion to Saturn
IS THIS REAL
No fucking way
Ily
Do not lick the powerhead
Lick the powerhead
they got in
ITAR isn't real
engines look fake

CAT
Cag 🥰
Kot
oxidizing
an employee already played a prank using callipso, they told alexa red alert, NASA misson control was not amused
real?
yes
dont worry it didnt do anything but flash red lights and sound an alarms that wasnt linked to anything
Literally who thought this thing was a good idea
Yes and no
It has multiple differences mainly in its programming
Orion's cameras give us amazing views of its adventure around the Moon. See up close views of the Moon from Orion's external cameras as well as the view from inside the capsule.
Orion is the vehicle that will take astronauts on Artemis missions. It’s the only spacecraft capable of human deep space flight and high-speed return to Earth from the ...
ICPS sep
@cedar portal
WHAT THE FUCK YOOOOOOO
Amazon marketing for starters
Lockheed engineers
Bruh moment
why bruh
Because Alexa
The only thing I have ever seen an Alexa do is say "I found this on the web" unprompted in the middle of several of my college lectures
Alexa isn't that bad
A voice operated system I get in principle it's just that Alexa sucks ass
I've had an alexa for a couple years and its okay
What I want to know is who went through and modified the code for the Alexa derivative on an actual spacecraft then thought "should we remove the funny "red alert" prank call prompt? nahhhh"
I mean
why would they remove it
they literally made a party mode
Someone says "red alert" during an actual emergency and the Alexa starts uselessly blaring a foghorn alarm and flashing the lights for the funny
who the fuck would say red alert during an actual emergency 💀
I don't fucking know
"I'm gonna be stuck in space with no internet for a month on Gateway, good thing I brought a physical copy of my favorite Xbox 360 RTS game-" WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP
/j
NASA will hold a briefing to preview plans for the Orion spacecraft to exit distant retrograde orbit and begin the journey back to Earth. NASA TV coverage of the first of two maneuvers to exit lunar orbit, called the distant retrograde orbit departure burn, will be Dec. 1, 2022, at 4:30 p.m. EST (21:30 UTC). The burn is scheduled to occur at 4:5...
Live Now
We awarded @ICON3DTech a #smallbiz contract to continue work on a construction system that could be used on the Moon and Mars! This technology is designed to use local resources to build infrastructure such as landing pads, habitats, roads, and more: https://t.co/OKIcbwT1Qz
131
They need to bring a 3D printer on A4
Splashdown Dec 11 18:06 UTC
On Flight Day 15, Orion also performed a planned orbit maintenance burn to maintain the spacecraft’s trajectory and decrease its velocity ahead of its Thursday departure from a distant lunar orbit. During the burn, Orion used six of its auxiliary thrusters on the European Service module to fire for 95 seconds. The burn was initially planned for a shorter duration but was lengthened as part of the team’s effort to add test objectives to the mission. The 95-second burn provided additional data to characterize the thrusters and the radiative heating on the spacecraft’s solar array wings to help inform Orion’s operational constraints. All previous thruster burns were 17 seconds or less.
Boeing has provided information to NSF on how the Center Core performed on A1.
Initial orbit planned for Orion after ICPS separation: 30 x 1,805.7 km.
Achieved orbit for Orion after ICPS separation: 30 x 1800.1 km.
Because "An underspeed of 2.1 meters per second (7 feet per second) occurred within parameters at main engine cutoff (MECO)."
First burn completed
Fist
On Dec. 5, NASA will air the lunar flyby of the Orion spacecraft on its return trek toward Earth. Orion completed a burn Dec. 1 to exit a lunar orbit thousands of miles beyond the Moon, where engineers have been testing systems to improve understanding of the spacecraft before future missions with astronauts. The return powered flyby burn, in wh...
Show
Show
L2 LEAK : Artemis II just launched
Artemis I has launched !
When?
Game Over for SpaceX and Blue Origin?
Yes

I love my Artemis I lock screen
Yeah

even Scott Manley admitted the Artemis footage is worse than Apollo
The launch footage is a little mehhhh
It all gets blown out by the SRBs
None of the cameras that I have seen accounted for it
The best way to appreciate the launch of Artemis I I think was a wide angle showing how it turns night into day
That's awesome
It's funny when you sync a music over the launch footage
Also yeah 👆
Everyday Astronaut's wide angle view was fucking crazy
I liked the view from the camera on the launch tower
- it’s 1 mission compared to 15
- it’s downlinked video, which is much higher quality than Apollo’s
- the footage will be better off the landed SDs
wasn't apollo footage recorded to film
modern footage is whatever quality it's encoded at
Better pictures once Orion Splashes down
If the export control lawyers let it out :/
space footage is itar im afraid
especially high quality versions of already released space footage
the ground footage is also worse
the camera's just aren't as good
and I'm pretty sure we got some "full resolution" images downloaded from Orion as well
all the footage i've seen has been great wdym
It's great but not Apollo great
gonna be hard to beat this https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasacommons/52501993306/
A close-up view of the lunar roving vehicle (LRV) at the Taurus-Littrow landing site photographed during Apollo 17 lunar surface extravehicular activity. Note the makeshift repair arrangement on the right rear fender of the LRV. During EVA-1 a hammer got underneath the fender and a part of it was knocked off. Astronauts Eugene A. Cernan and Harr...
the film isn’t what makes it great though, it’s what camera placement we get to see
these guys were so cool
are there like, resolution numbers for both of them or are we like comparing from what we see with our eyes
latter
effective resolution of film is more complicated than digital, but the upshot is it was a lot better than early digital cameras, but we now have digital cameras that pretty well match the resolution of most film formats
ah
well imo it looks great
and im so happy it got off the ground and was a complete success
Whether we actually use those cameras tho might be a different story, a 720p stream from a GoPro is not 35mm
tyy
but on the other hand it is a livestream
yeah!
yeah because they can't just stream in 1080 like normal people
The film cameras back then also had high resolution but it's not the most important thing for image quality
good to see the artemis 1 channel is still a bunch of complaining 
If only Schmitt didn't become what he is now
you know it
ugh yeah don’t remind me
the hell https://lunus.xyz/WPZkGU.png
couldn't expect less from the trio of ryan, sunburnt and the random letter guy
why is media in mpeg4 but public in mpeg2
Clancy
you literally missed the funniest part of this channel
which part was that?
When everyone was spamming "We Are Going"
oh god yh
We Went

we came (back to earth)
OH WAIT
One of the most ambitious first flights ever being a smooth success
Hi chris
so here's what nasa UHD is streaming http://endpnt.com:8000/nasa-uhd.ts
a downscaled version is found here https://endpnt.com/nasa-hd/
11th of December
Link?
dumb opinin
true.
I'm very glad the Earth was taken over by Kang and not Kodos
the entire system performed well, no matter the manufacturer
VACCO is the ones we should hate
what did they do
YOU ARE BACJ
Me collecting the NXF stones so I can do what needs to be done
most of it, yes
the cameras are 4k fwiw
does anyone know what time Orion will do it's lunar flyby tomorrow
ELI5?
Lol that was great, probably the most packed the voice chat has ever and will ever be
I think there was 23 people in there at one point
Dumb climate denier
Wtf? How can a fucking astronaut be a climate denier
I don't fucking know, he was literally the only astronaut with a science background of the entire fucking Apollo program
The guy was a geologist
and somehow he denies climate change
And meanwhile I was in Uni 
(I still managed to watch the launch but I was a bit pissed)
It’s amazing how people can be made to see what they need to
Only a fraction of available ground footage has been released. There are some absolutely jaw dropping shots that haven’t been shared yet.
Current Orion footage is limited by downlink bandwidth. One of the first things recovery teams are doing after splashdown is pulling cards, which I believe will then be flown mainland. Can’t wait to see the shots we’ll get off those!
out of curiosity what are those shots of and dyk if they’ll be released?
i also get you might not be able to answer lol
I don’t have access to all of the footage, but I’ve seen a lot of shots from around the pad and additional onboard footage. Some colleagues have described the incredible footage they’ve seen that I really wish I had access to. Unfortunately, I have no idea when they’ll all be released.
fingers crossed that it’s asap
On Dec. 5, NASA will air the lunar flyby of the Orion spacecraft on its return trek toward Earth. Orion completed a burn Dec. 1 to exit a lunar orbit thousands of miles beyond the Moon, where engineers have been testing systems to improve understanding of the spacecraft before future missions with astronauts. The return powered flyby burn, in wh...
42P
Rescue training last Friday prior to Sunday's splashdown.
11:43 UTC Second Burn
Why tf we got a second moon
The earth in front of the sun
thx ill steal that
minmus lmao
Nah that's Mars
Full video LAS Jettison
big cnc
guys sls rollback :/
Return to the VAB, complete the inspections after launch to see the other damages and start repairing.
also have to install new things for Artemis II
For the time being, finishing the construction of the other parts, after NASA reviews the Orion data from Artemis I, the work will be faster.
any proposed NET?
The motors are supposed to be installed by the end of the month.
after that, Core Stage will be sent to KSC.
March 2025 at the earliest
Right now it is scheduled for May 2024, a realistic date would be from late 2024 onwards.
mmm
great turnaround times
although I suppose that's more a mission readiness thing
This is based off NASA's own "at least 27 months" estimate which uhhh I have zero faith in
But I agree with Mirande, 2025 is what will probably happen.
when'll we have a fully assembled SLS?
Mirande, that's a new one
🙂
I mean, the integration process will be faster on Artemis II than on Artemis I, but now humans will be traveling, so they have to do more checks on some things and make sure that those traveling on that Orion ship return safely to Earth.
I keep getting tweet notifications from other unrelated Miranda (plural) and thinking it's you
JWST 2007
SLS 2017
ORBIT 2019
LANDING 2020
UHH WAIT NVM. LANDING 2024
I love aerospace deadlines
orbit 2019
We are many
Now I want to meet the other unrelated miranda
I believe he will be back Thursday night/Friday morning.
iirc January is SRB integration
(month most likely be wrong but I remember it was early 2023)
Core Stage won't be delivered by January, much less had its SRBs stacked?
Booster stacking happens first
I mean A1 core was integrated after twin SRBs being complete
And IIRC core delivery is early next year, not sure what month
My fucking god @lone pelican how many gimmick accounts do you follow
Just went searching for other Miranda and went "wtf"
lmao
what's the fun in twitter if it's not gimmicky
The Artemis I Center Core had more tests and stuff, this time it will be finished and sent to KSC, it will not go through Stennis and other tests.
The only engine that will be tested is the ICPS engine.

guess we're getting a few hotfire aborts this time round
Checking this I just said I saw it on NSF, but sure 99%.

WDR will only be done once stacked and at 39B.
No static fires
I don’t see why. I believe every one of these engines for Artemis 2 has fired on the ground before, and two of them have flown shuttle missions
RS-25 ain’t Raptor
it was a joke bruh
July 2024-2025 Is probably the window for A2 Launch???
Also my brain finally clicked and considering A2 is going to be later in 2024, I assume stacking ops would start sometime maybe late next year
Isn't the core stage getting it's engines installed soon
Yes, should be about now
It’ll be delivered to the KSC early next year and… wait
Because SLS isn’t the pacing item for the mission
In particular, Core Stage 2 is approximately 85% complete according to Zietsman, with engine installation work set for completion by the end of the year ahead of a planned spring 2023 shipment of the stage to the Kennedy Space Center.
kinda epic
“We’re very far along across our assembly and integration of Core Stage 2,” said Zietsman. “We’ve got our major assemblies done; we’re getting into our functional test of the engine section, and then the next major event that we do after the engine section functional test is the integration and final mate — the mate the rest of the assembly to the LH2 [liquid hydrogen], the LOX [liquid oxygen] tank.”
The main assembly of the LH2, LOX, forward skirt, and intertank structure for Core Stage 2 is already assembled.
Status update on Orion for A2???
Correction, what will be sent to Stennis will be the EUS for the Green Run in 2024.
Like the Core Stage, the first EUS will head to the Stennis Space Center for a Green Run series of tests, including a full-duration hot firing of its four RL10C-3 engines.
While Boeing is the prime contractor for the EUS, Aerojet Rocketdyne will build and supply the RL10C-3 engines for the stage.
At present, the first EUS Green Run is scheduled for 2024. “We’re tracking to that plan, and we’re moving along through finishing up the design phase while we’re getting all of our components ordered and the qualification hardware in work,” noted Zietsman.
A2 can't come soon enough
The only thing I know is that they have to wait for Orion from Artemis I to return to process the data and remove some equipment or hardware, since a part that flew on Artemis I will fly on Artemis II.
Orion heat shield arrived in October at KSC
Some parts of the LAS are also already in KSC.
NASA mentioned at some point that what they were doing during the latter part of this year was powering up the vehicle for the first time to check that everything is OK.
Well, I just checked and that was in June.
Most of the work is waiting on A1 Orion to return so they can get those reused components
It was Moon 2019, then Moon not, then Moon 2028, then Moon 2024
2 SLS rockets in a year????
Would be great but no
When do we get the Astronaut selection for A2????
After Artemis I comes back
Yep
So like a week or longer????
SLS production cadence can be easily modified to support 2 SLS a year
I would say that next year
likely longer
Gonna need SpaceX to pump out a HLS quickly
Maybe when Center Core comes to KSC
SLS-3 is gonna be waiting for so long lol
Makes sense
Want a British Astronaut to be on A3
Saying center core implies there are other cores attached
A3 is going to be all American
What about A4
ESA needs to hire SpaceX to have them land on the Moon
ESA and JAXA are currently trying to win NASA’s favor in getting the first international landing seat
Is that going to be on A5
No
A5 is gonna be another European astronaut staying on Gateway
Just hire SpaceX
When will this be then???
to be decided
Still trying to figure out what the second lander is gonna be
Okay? If it has the bipartisan support y'all claim it does, then why hasn't it happened
Im curious what will happen first
Because there’s no mission demand for twice a year yet?
hell freezing over or SLS being worth it
Nah core stage arrival or Starship OFD
Because it's NASA
CS-3 will probably be ready for delivery in 2024
If they can launch A3 in 2025 like they say they will i will be shocked
A3 in 2025 is literally not possible
It's A2 in 2025
Artemis III launching in 2025 depends on HLS being ready
That's their stupid aspirational goal they stick to for no good reason. Same as SpaceX saying December OFD-1
I like to think of A3-A5 timelines as decoupled from the non-SLS/Orion/EGS elements, since those are more in flux and missions can always be re-baselined
I think Artemis II is more certain to fly in 2025 considering the advanced state of everything for it
I mean they are not going to be able to launch SLS in less then a year
The holdup there would be data review and pad turnaround after Artemis II
July 2024 - July 2025
March 2025+
That's 27 months
The best estimate we have
27 months is February
It's not gonna be any sooner than that, the question is how much further
They need 27 months to get it ready???
Speaking of going to the Moon, new news.
NASA is working on a robotic arm that can work at -173°, cold temperatures are a disaster for robots, this is the beginning of a solution.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-is-testing-a-new-robotic-arm-that-really-knows-how-to-chill-out
27 months to do data analysis, refurbish reused parts from Artemis I, finish Orion, lots of pad testing
If I had a penny for every fucking question mark you used I'd be a very wealthy woman
Artemis II is gonna spend a lot of time doing tests at the pad
I use them a llot
Certain avionics components from Artemis I’s Orion are being used on Artemis II, which has unfortunately led to 1:1 delays with the mission so far. Once Orion is back on the ground and the avionics are looked at, the schedule should shore up quickly enough
There won’t be any Green Run, or COVID (hopefully), or first-time hiccups to drag out the schedule like with Artemis I
Tho anything can happen
There is already Artemis II hardware at the cape as well
While COLDArm won’t be operating in liquid nitrogen, it could operate on a lander sent to a frozen ocean world like Jupiter’s moon Europa, where its lack of heated parts would have the added benefit of allowing collection of volatile materials without significantly affecting the temperature of samples. It could free up some two hours of time and up to 30% of a mission daily’s energy budget that Mars rovers like Curiosity and Perseverance spend warming up their robotic arms so their gears don’t stress and break in the cold.
Amazing!
ICPS-2 has been vibing at the cape for probably a year now
Hasn't #3 as well? Or at least it's finished?
Like, isn't the DCSS line already shut down
SpaceX will go under if Starship doesn't orbit next month
wasn’t the Thanksgiving letter talking about a launch every two weeks by the end of 2022?
Yep 
To be perfectly fair... Neither was "we choose to go to the moon" in 1962
But the political landscape is dramatically different today, so 
IMO one of the reasons the HLS/SLD contract structure is so weird rn is because the previous NASA admin was all-in on 2024 and did a very weird contract selection and the next admin is trying to correct it without totally walking it back
flashbacks to WDR attempts for A1
The mouthy Orion!
A final post burn gimbal check on OMS engine S/N 111, which just performed her last burn around the Moon after flying on 19 Space Shuttle missions. Ad Astra per Aspera
#Artemis1
Gimball on action
Of course, they're "AJ10"
I presume they don't come back
Correct, except in this case I am all for that
The fewer "AJ10" in the world the better
5th ESM making good progress
What are they doing for A5???
Ariane 5 is retiring soon
Hope that answers your question
Launching ESPRIT to gateway
i Mean Artemis 5
2nd landing
What HLS are they using???
Starship
Wait no
I got confused
Starship was originally slated for A5 but got moved up to A4
The SLD lander will be used for A5
I've asked this before, but I wonder if there's anyone out there who thinks that space is real, the Earth is round and goes around the Sun, and that everything from the Shuttle on including Artemis is real... but that Apollo specifically was faked. As in, only the Moon landings specifically were faked for prestige after the Soviets beat us to orbit and we couldn't find anything else to do. Moon truther purism.
It's still batshit insane but also really funny.
There is
People still believe that???
Literally Interstellar
I saw people saying that this time they are going on the Moon for real not like, I quote "the Apollo bullshit"
Bruh moment
Fuck I forgot how much I want to punch the principal from Interstellar
I think the second landers are getting announced within a month
this so much
well one
Ah
What'll be interesting is the infos we'll finally get on LM and NG's proposals
considering they're taking much more time with this program
Now that they separated themselves from National Team
How many proposals are there now?
they aren't truly seperated
National Team is still working together
there are just seperate teams within Lockheed and Northrop working on their own landers
(yes they can do that)
at least 5 i believe
What are they?
So what happens if for example Northrop gets the contract ?
Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Dynetics and uhhh
I think I saw a collage of them here at one point recently but can't find it now
Lockheed, Northrop, NT, Dynetics, and SpaceX but they're technically not competing for this specific contract
they get the contract, simple
Yeah seems obvious
I don't even know why I asked in the first place
Found it
SLD is gonna be plagued with problems
considering that its underfunded and more ambitious
what the FUCK is the BO craft
SLD?
Sustained Lunar Development
two stage lander
Dynetics 
Descent and Ascent element have merged
dynetics is cool but they seem to have forgotten the ladder and then dropped it in there somewhere
Honestly the Dynetics one has always been weirdest-looking to me
Both the old and new ones
The Northrop and LM ones look really fine
so SpX are still contracted for first lunar landing?
yeah
I just really like the flat stable look Dynetics one has
and well iirc SLD is split into two contracts actually
One for developing the second lander and one for upgrading Starship HLS
HLS starship my beloved
how many landings per spacex lander did we say?
(ie per craft not contract)
HLS for A3 will be disposed
how are you gonna refuel it
isn't that the whole point of starship
sending tankers all the way out to NRHO is a very complicated and risky CONOPs
fair
in its reusable config its supposed to be refueled on the Lunar surface iirc
but SpaceX and NASA haven't looked out that far yet
mhm
though i hope we have some level of surface infrastructure by the end of the decade
how actually viable is on moon prop stuff
NASA is starting to invest in developing that sort of tech now
well making Hydrolox shouldn't be too hard
but CH4 is where it gets interesting
because they need to figure out where the Carbon deposits are and AFAIK its not abundant
unless you want to ship Carbon up from Earth or somewhere else
SpaceX's entire mindset when it comes to the Starship HLS contract can kinda just be summed up as
lmao
wonder what the viability is of a fully stocked carbon starship
like would it be enough to get both landers back


