#Artemis I Mission
1 messages · Page 8 of 1
we're gonna get video of the powered flyby
Maybe you'll get to be there for the first humans on Mars then, if you stay long enough?
I plan on making NASA my career
but before then im planning on going military
Coolio
wait-
the 2030s? we're the same age
what's your plan, then?
Space Force?
space force or air force
Makes sense
still trying to figure out if I want to be a pilot or not
saaame, kinda
Damn y'all are ambitious
being a pilot would help me become an astronaut
but getting the military to pay for my Master's degree would help too
wait, wait wait-
being an astronaut is your endgame plan too?
ye
i should become an ESA astro
ayyyy
Imma be honest I just like watching this stuff I'm probably gonna be like, a history professor or curator or something since I'm good at that, I suck at STEM in real life lmao
🙏
though what's interesting is astro is also kinda not my end game
I plan on doing shit after a career as an astro too
first polish astro since the 70s lol
makes sense
maybe run for office, or start a company
John Glenn moment
being the first congressman to step foot on another world would be cool af
I suppose John Glenn didn't get where he did by being modest did he
really shows the extent of American space dominance
my main issue is that my vision sucks
AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH
My heart is a bit wonky, but other than that I'm set
Yeah my left eye is fucked and I have intestinal issues lmao
It really depends on your correction, you don't need perfect vision to fly
but my eye is correctable
Example : Doug Hurley literally having his glasses in orbit
I'm not really concerned about the physical requirements, just the intelligence and mindset
Astronauts, stereotypically, are workaholics
I'm definitely not
Aren't like 90% of you Autism and ADHD tho
you underestimate my ability to be away from the vast majority of the human race
and I might have high cholesterol, don't know if that will affect my chances though
I mean you could also become an ESA Parastronaut 
I'm not aware of me being Autistic or having ADHD
I doubt it would unless it causes a heart condition or smth
Fair enough
I uhhhh
Wasn't that literally an actual episode
nah that was Homer
"I apologize for the metric units, I'll make the conversion for you"
LMAOOOO THIS IS THE MOST AMERICAN SENTENCE I'VE EVER HEARD IN MY WHOLE DAMN LIFE
Barney was also in the program with him and got sober. The punch line at the end was that Barney passed flawlessly but then relapsed from the celebratory champagne and Homer was the backup.
rip
nvm then i sit corrected
i wonder why
wait-
why the hell not?
sociopaths lack empathy, right?
then why wouldn't you put them in a purely scientific and logical environment?
ah, ah k
that's fair
Do you want someone with no empathy crammed with like 2 other people and no practical oversight in an unleavable tin can on another planet
just clicked for me, sociopaths usually aren't good at making friends
my though process was that someone without empathy would be unaffected by tragedy and would be able to make rational decisions where the average person would be crushed by empathy-induced stress
but i forgot that sociopaths aren't sociable people
at least not for the right reasons
..no offense to any sociopaths here
The thing though is that empathy can also be a massive motivator, if something really bad happens and you want your crew to live for emotional reasons then you'll work harder to keep them alive and make the mission work.
yeah, seems legit
who knew, knowing what emotions are can be a good thing
E-8 is legendary
Congressional support seems to be still high
Cinematic video I put together of the launch of Artemis-1
Music is OST from The Martian (2015)
Disclaimer: I included external sound for the launch from an STS launch
As the startup sequence and overall setup is near identical I think it's fair game
None of this footage is mine. Most of it is public domain
great video
any high quality videos from Orion yet
No, we only got the two videos above
and also another video of the ICPS with the Core Stage falling back to Earth in the background
and solar panels deployment
So the same as the livestream
someone edited free bird to the artemis launch
amazing
anyone want the yt link'
?
Yes
That is what I have been waiting for
embed 
how are they yet to fix that ngMeta stuff
best shot
new background
Agreed
the video doesn't seem to work
Now?
Over the past few days, a team assessed anomalous star tracker data that correlated with thruster firings. Star trackers are sensitive cameras that take pictures of the star field around Orion. By comparing the pictures to its built-in map of stars, the star tracker can determine which way Orion is oriented. Teams now understand the readings and there are no operational changes.

Images from CubeSat ArgoMoon
Cool earth pic
Moon pic is a bit eeh
Will be cool to see the closeups when Orion passes by
it’s a flight test
small anomalies happen
it’s not a danger to the rest of the flight
it was found and fixed
not sure why
basically
star trackers though exhaust was stars
Videos of the launch as seen from spectators a few miles from the launch pad are fucking insane
It feels like it's daytime even though it was almost 2am
Big Bright Ball
this is what happens when you light the two biggest solid rocket motors ever flown
If you light big sticks you got big ball
differences between A1 and A2 Orion
3000 more pounds of propellant (about 1.4 tons) and 2500 more pounds (about 1.1 tons) of “other stuff”
I imagine that 1.1 tons includes life support, occupants, accommodations, and experiments
apparently the LES also weighs like five hundred pounds more on Artemis II?
since the discrepancy is 6000 instead of 5500
Have to remember propellant burn could account for the 500lbs less
Wasn't the LES on Artemis I not actually functional?
The abort motor was inert
But shouldn’t have made it weigh less cause of mass sun
*sim
Gotcha
or that, has to be extra propellant burned between liftoff and TMI
Holy fucking shit
Tim Dodd's SLS vids
THIS IS LITERALLY THE SUN
Oh my fucking god
well a lot of people underestimated the srb brightness
Yeah but like wow
You know, possibly dumb question, but why was the abort motor made inert? I ask because if Artemis I had failed, as bad as that would have been, wouldn't that have been a great opportunity to test the abort motors? They could say to Congress "Yes, it failed, but it also would have been 100% survivable if crew were onboard. We've demonstrated that even in event of failure it's a safe system." to help secure the program's future in that scenario.
I asked this a while back, but they just said that the escape system wasn’t part of what they wanted to test with Artemis I
It’s really good that it didn’t blow given that decision
Yeah
it’s more money that they didn’t have to spend
I only want night launches now
they’ve already had multiple LAS tests they didn’t need to spend money for another one
Saved costs, plus abort motor had already been extensively tested
They also didn’t want to risk of an abort motor going off early
Thinking about it actually saved quite a bit of Monday
*money
if it did wouldn’t they want to find that out now tho lol
everything else makes sense but i don’t get that
Let’s say you’re having a nominal flight
But something accidently triggers the abort motor
There goes your mission that was going perfectly because a line of code or a sensor went bad
Even though everything was perfectly fine
Yeah but also if that was gonna happen wouldn't you want it to happen on a mission without crew
This makes sense though
There are two sides to the coin
While yes you want it to happen on an uncrewed flight
But you want to get as much flight data as possible on an uncrewed first flight as well
Yeah fair
Hot take but maybe you shouldn't put crew on a rocket on its second launch
better than putting it on a first flight with 0 abort system
At least now Artemis I has proven that SLS is a pretty safe rocket now
Don't jinx it
Well Orion has met that requirement
I mean, SLS seems to have the largest liftoff thrust of any rocket flown ever successfully through 1st stage flight...
Saturn V: 35.1 MN
Space Shuttle: 31.25 MN
Energia: 34.8 MN
(Falcon Heavy: 22.1 MN)
SLS: 36.64 MN
(N1: 45.4 MN, but see below)
[Starship/Super-Heavy: 75.9 MN]
https://twitter.com/Cosmic_Penguin/status/1594016005889482753
@jaek_walshxx @NASA_Nerd @NASASpaceflight To be fair, the N1 never managed to have all 1st stage engines working properly:
1st lost 2 engines a few s in; all shut down at T+68s
2nd shutdown T+10s; fell back on pad and blew up
3rd disintegrated T+50s
4th (planned) shutdown 6 engines caused stress & disintegrated T+107s
True I suppose. I guess it's excusable with an abort motor since, well, you can abort.
I think I read somewhere it's cost related
Seriously though why the hell did they put crew on STS-1
Already went over that
What did anyone have to gain from that
because uh
No idea
I think it was because we didn’t want to trust a computer landing there thing
one time they wanted to make Shuttle unmanned but some astronauts INSISTED it remained manned.
if that’s a vulnerability shouldn’t we find it now?
true
It would’ve been caught the same on Artemis I, just it wouldn’t you know destroy the flight
It also doesn't help that in the 70s there was only a single plane capable of fully autonomous flight
From a quick Google it seems that the logic was to avoid an uncrewed flight possibly crashing into populated areas of California under the flight path to Edwards AFB. I guess the logic was that it'd be better to possibly kill a small number of astronauts who know the risks on a failed launch than to possibly kill several hundred random civilians due to a computer error on landing. Buran was able to avoid this because Kazakhstan is fucking empty.
A lot of Shuttle decisions were made by politics, and non-engineers. That's why it's such a disastrous rocket
Oh the woes of being a slightly more densely populated country
Anyways, we’re so close to Orion entering Lunar SOI
Also shuttle was believed to be very safe
“it’s as safe as an airplane and we don’t test airplanes uncrewed.”
Almost had a LOCV on STS-1, STS-27R, actually had two with STS-51L and STS-107 and we're still continuing to make the same mistakes as shuttle (though fewer in number luckily)
I wish we got the Path B kerolox S1 SLS :/
sorry, kerolox SLS core stage?
gotcha
Well, it'd be a very different vehicle. Much more closely related to the Saturn V
there was a concept path that had SLS being a remastered Saturn V essentially
great heavens
there was also a concept path that had SLS being the hellspawn of Atlas or Delta
People often wonder why we no longer Saturn V. It turns out that there's an alternate universe where that would be happening right about now. This talk looks at some less-well-known SLS history.
For those interested in the political side of SLS, I highly recommend Rand Simberg's "Safe is not an option"
https://www.amazon.com/Safe-Not-Option-Ran...
ooooh
Yeah they wanted to make a kerolox SLS but in the end the current SLS proposals won out because it's built on "Shuttle heritage" and this would have, they said, reduced the cost
I'll watch later
It's long but soooo worth it
yea this seems very interesting
wouldn't say wanted
all 3 proposals were being looked into
its quite possible the kerolox path would've costed much more to develop than what we currently have considering it would be completely from scratch
core stage with F-1s
anyways
chances are it it was anything like Saturn V the production cost would've been much lower than SLS
Well, Saturn V launches were cheap because they frontloaded the dev costs
if it was anything like Saturn V it would've costed 60 billion to develop
It's not really an apples to apples comparison
they wouldn't have to reinvent the moon rocket. They just had to redesign it a bit so be manufacturable using more modern methonds
Thats way oversimplifying it
J-2X and F-1B we’re already attempts at that and that was already pretty difficult
J-2X was moving backwards
Reject modernized GG, return to tap-off J-2S
Complete with throttle, more relights and Idle Mode
Per source, the pad damage exceeded mission management’s expectations. Elevator blast doors were blown right off, various pipes were broken, some large sheets of metal left laying around.
232
Yep, supposedly shit thrown over half a mile
Ares 1-X II: Test Flight Boogaloo
Cope
Gotta love the reaction of people to this vs how they would react if it were SpaceX
"well of course it is A LOT of thrust so you gotta expect some damage"
People don't get the part where it says that it exceeded expectations
I find the blast doors part the funniest
The difference is that NASA doesn't keep people standing 2 feet from the pad while this is happening lmao
But yeah
And when you point that out most people go out and say "well you know until you actually launch it you can't know exactly these things" ahhh so you mean it needed a test flight to find out stuff that was off from expected values! Like any other company out there!
well if something fails with NASA it's worse than if it fails with SpaceX
There's double standards on both sides but it is especially bad when coming from the Shelby Lunch System fans
The difference is they had a decade to figure this shit out, and spent so long supposedly so they'd get everything right the first time
What a shock, they didn't
Why do you guys have to rip each other apart about this lmao
no idea
Rockets cool, 'nuff said
Rockets that are a net drain on our spaceflight ambitions are not
that's a personal opinion
we have a crew capsule going to the Moon rn and you say its a drain on our spaceflight ambitions
'Ate Congress. 'Ate Musk. Lus SLS. Luv Starship. 'Nuff said.
So what else are they gonna do then. Practically I mean. What politically and economically viable alternative is there to Artemis right now that we could reasonably switch to under current conditions. Besides the hypothetical world where Congress is magically going to stop wanting money in Huntsville and agree to give Starship the whole mission for no reason other than efficiency, which has no bearing whatsoever on the government as it currently exists. What are we actually gonna do besides SLS to get crews back to the Moon with NASA money by the end of the 2020s. Where is that money gonna go besides hookers for Joe Manchin.
that indeed is one of the big reasons why they didn’t go with RAC-2, there would have been a more clean-sheet development, and so higher costs up front despite expected lower incremental costs.
HOLY CRAB
TIL Ross Tierney and most of the DIRECT team members managed to really see their Jupiter-241 Stretched Heavy fly at the KSC Saturn V Center!
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=55669.msg2430958#msg2430958
I’m so, so happy with this. DIRECT got me to start reading NSF forums around Summer of 2008 (yes, it was that long, we might have teens here who wasn’t even born back then). That’s a freaking long time ago!
DIRECT Launcher Team - SLS Launch Gathering
Pretty pog
In an ideal world in 2010 we would've recognized that building a single SHLV in the dumbest way possible (expendable hydrolox sustainer with solids & based around Shuttle components) is, well, dumb, and would've given the money to ULA and do multi-launch with DIVH and AV for ~1/2 the cost
I’m sure it was very gratifying for them to see the fruit of their efforts
you have a very poor imagination if you can’t think of any dumber way to do that.
In an ideal world I'd be surrounded by supermodels and have a private jet. We don't live there.
miranda do you like being irritated 24/7 about sls when you know you can just, leave this channel and live a happy life
That is me, reacting live
Not really
then leave the channel
well.
On both counts
and live a happy life
ok a less sad life then
A life with slightly less government corruption and a viable space exploration program would fit that bill
WHAT, DO YOU THINK I WANT TO BE HERE OR SOMETHING
I hate brexit
this isnt gonna end anywhere except people hating on you because of you hating on your government
Mfs took away palmer 
but you noticed that already
if not, you're an idiot and you just keep doing this for negative attention
if the state of your emotion in life is dependent on the government and the space exploration programs of the United States
than you need help
Fuck this.
Did Miranda leave
Yeah I was literally 4 years old
Certified isopod moment
yoooooo
Anyways, back to Artemis I
when 24/7 orion stream
Artemis II
Snoopy
i want it now
depends
production capacity is being organized to be able to support the demand for it if necessary
but that well
reeee
depends on probes choosing to take advantage of SLS capability
Hahaha I'm older than you cope

I'm debating if we should make an Artemis Program forum
I think the current launch date is May 2024; however, that depends on how well Artemis I turns out and how fast they can get some of A1's capsule hardware into A2. (Lockheed Martin says they are trying to reduce the time it takes to do that.) May 2024 or even slightly earlier seems earlier doable to me.
Neptune Odyssey is an orbiter mission concept to study Neptune and its moons, particularly Triton. The orbiter would enter into a retrograde orbit of Neptune to facilitate simultaneous study of Triton and would launch an atmospheric probe to characterize Neptune's atmosphere. The concept is being developed as a potential large strategic science ...
current launch date has for sure slipped from May 2024
ha i was 8 back then
Neptune Odyssey proposed using SLS
There was a proposal to launch a large probe to the edge of the interstellar medium with SLS, where Voyager 1 is now, not sure what happened to it though.
Dude I can fantasize me being there for A2 and missing my commencement
Europa Clipper was going to launch on SLS
still a concept
Makes sense
But they moved it to Falcon Heavy and it's going to take half a decade longer to get out there
now that SLS has launched and proven itself though, I do expect more probe proposals to pop up and take advantage of SLS's capability
The question is whether "probe proposals" becomes "probes" TBH
"Although the SLS is only confirmed for use on the first few Artemis missions, many NASA mission concept studies for robotic missions planned to launch on the SLS, such as: Neptune Odyssey, Europa Lander, Enceladus Orbilander, Persephone, HabEx, Origins Space Telescope, LUVOIR, Lynx, and Interstellar probe."
I was uuuuh old
Europa Lander, if it ever flies, might use it
The next NASA flagship planetary mission to be developed, the Uranus orbiter and entry probe, is baselined on an expendable Falcon Heavy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranus_Orbiter_and_Probe?wprov=sfti1
The Uranus Orbiter and Probe is an orbiter mission concept to study Uranus and its moons. The orbiter would also deploy an atmospheric probe to characterize Uranus's atmosphere. The concept is being developed as a potential large strategic science mission for NASA. The current proposal targets a launch in 2031 using a Falcon Heavy expendable lau...
2025*
It will probe deep into Uranus
I always thought that probes could take more advantage of super-heavy lift capability to get out there quick. Yes it is more expensive but you can do more science out there for longer since your taking significantly less time to get out there.
The problem is NASA does not have the money for it to be more expensive
Specially with flagship missions
What’s the name of the thing? I want to do some more reading on it
i mean, state of emotion based on what the government is doing esp when it comes to trans ppl is kinda a valid thing, but the rest of it is dumb
NGRST is already overbudget for example and it's not even like super revolutionary or anything but it doesn't help that COVID and supply chain issues happened
Wasn't Starship proposed to launch LUVOIR
Lukewarm take but I don't see SLS launching anything other than Artemis missions anywhere in the near or medium-term future. This isn't to say anything in particular about SLS, I just don't see any probes large and/or fast enough to require it being approved, and if they are then the other huge rocket with a name starting with S will probably be cheaper for them (even if it proves to reach nowhere near the costs X is claiming it will).
"Interstellar probe"
the smaller LUVOIR yeah
That was just a study to see if it could fit it
Just a sec I'll get it
There’s a smaller one?
Interstellar Probe (ISP) is a proposed NASA space probe designed to explore and characterize the heliosphere and interstellar space. The study was originally proposed in 2018 by NASA for the Applied Physics Laboratory. It would have a baseline launch between 2036 and 2041. The probe would launch on a direct hyperbolic trajectory to encounter Jup...
Slay, thank you very much
Like many studies, they tend to baseline or look at some specific rockets. Most of the big probes are looking at SLS Block 2 as baseline since that's what they're guiding for as a target in many of their studies like trajectory, mass budget, etc
But it doesn't necessarily mean they'll use that rocket, just that kind of capability
LUVOIR B
two versions
one that fully capitalizes on Block 2 capabilities
The interesting thing is that it can encounter some TNOs
and one that is designed for something like Falcon Heavy
And the same mission can change the baseline as well. Dragonfly's original study baselined it on an Atlas V 421 but now that heavier rockets are cheaper and more accessible their baseline is Falcon Heavy and New Glenn
Something only New Horizons has done
Dragonfly is so based
We stan a queen
Neat! Thought that luvoir A was all there was
If I recall correctly there was language in the request for proposal to contract out SLS operation to a private company after A4 (In the same way NASA contracted out Space Shuttle operations to United Space Alliance.) that said that NASA intends to scale up SLS production to two per year with one for Artemis and the other for other programs.
So SLS being used for non-Artemis programs is certainly possible.
Fair
one hundred and five tons of spy satellite coming right up
DOD also said they were looking into the possibility of using SLS
makes sense considering the DoD wants to expand its domain of operations all the way out to at least the Moon
Polyus 2: American Edition 
I wish we could tell them to fuck off but oh well
Perhaps the only space launch I'm legitimately glad failed to reach orbit.
"
You know I get that this is one of those questions that's been asked repeatedly asked since before Apollo but... what does the DoD want on the Moon exactly? Nothing is there except other spacecraft to spy on and blow up, there's literally no strategic value to military operations beyond high Earth orbit whatsoever for anyone.
Which is why conspiracy theories of the CIA have bases on the moon are stupid
Yeah
In for all mankind
FaM lore incoming
The only reason the moon was militarized was because Soviets have a permanent presence there
Yeah
because the possibility of the United States having permanent assets on the Moon, it is the responsibility of the US Space Force to ensure the safety of those assets
Yeah I suppose
I could see a scenario where a country says "you know what, I want to become a space empire"
as well as continuing the monitoring of space traffic already done in Earth orbit
Actually claim territory on the moon
because rn there's no system specifically meant to track the location of spacecraft around the Moon
yikes
it’s American imperialism, but in space
isn't imperialism since there's no countries in space to bully
its expansionism
Ryan when he finds out that the space program has had military applications since literally WW2 (the US military is unbased)
Do I look like I support or have ever supported the militarisation of space
No
good point, expansionism
which as a national policy is still destructive toward any uses for the good of humanity of course
but yeah no other countries to bully, we’re just making sure we have the ability to bully other countries once they get there
The Space Launch System (SLS) is an American super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle developed by NASA starting in 2011. As of 16 November, it's the most powerful rocket to launch succesfully, with 8.8 million pounds of thrust. The first launch, designated Artemis 1, occurred on November 16, 2022, from Kennedy Space Center. It replaces the Ares I and Ares V launch vehicles, which were cancelled along with the rest of the Constellation program, a previous program aimed to return to the Moon.
It’s amazing how much farther along Artemis is compared to Constellation
Especially considering Artemis turns 4 next year
Damn
Wait didn't Artemis start in 2017
2019
2017 is when NASA's goal was focused on the Moon, 2019 was when Artemis as a program was created and locked down the focus
Ah gotcha
Yeah there are a number of qualms I have with Jim Bridenstine's history but he did do a hell of a job running NASA
Just days from reaching the Moon, the @NASA_Orion spacecraft captured this selfie while flying through space.
The #Artemis I mission is preparing us to bring astronauts to the Moon. https://t.co/uQaCgAXaUm
OH YES
LETS GO
🥵
We Are Going!
Hot pic
good
@valid dock My reaction when I saw the pic :
france noises
"WHY THE FUCK DO I HAVE A BONER ???"
Least horny rainbow message
i lost
Spacecraft get selfies, too.
While teams performed a checkout on the @NASA_Orion spacecraft, these images were captured of the outside of the vehicle.
The #Artemis I mission is just a couple days from reaching the Moon: https://t.co/7Y3o8TGU3C
@cedar portal
I'm going to go nuts
This is literally a crew-rated spacecraft taking selfies of itself on its way to the Moon
I just can't believe what I'm currently seeing
this is real worm hours
and Miranda would say "This is a drain on our spaceflight ambitions"
talking a lotta smack now that she’s gone
I have talked smack direct to her face
My "I'm going nuts moment" is when we see those selfies with a person doing the selfie
You know like EVA style
I can't wait to see how many millions of STEM careers are going to be influenced by the Artemis program
Young people are going to be so fucking inspired
Literally Apollo but in 2022
less than have been influenced by SpaceX
It's going to be something else when we actually start landing on the Moon with Artemis III and all
when people see the massive SS on the surface of the moon
call it something pther than SS lmao
why do you have to make that a contest? They’re both part of that.
(I still think that SS is a very horrible choice for an acronym)
also yes this

anyway
but yeah
We live in crazy times for spaceflight
and I can't wait to see what's next
When people see the massive Starship erect and glittering on the lunar surface amid the chaotic sharp rocks they will be inclined to join SpaceX
We have Terran 1, starship, Ariane 6, Vulcan, etc it really is an exciting time with so many new launch vehicles coming into the market
sorry for shilling SpaceX so much
It’s fine everyone has there own opinions
yeah
There’s no need to apologize about what you think
It's fine, I just think that it's going to be a broader movement than just SpaceX alone
Everyone will want to work in STEM-related fields and of course spaceflight
Like
"Oh my god, we can actually do crazy stuff like that ????"
"I WANT TO BE PART OF IT"
no no there is a need to apologise for that specifically
That’s literally how I got involved lmao
eh
there's gonna be a big old NASA on it too
as well as Artemis logos
I doubt SpaceX would be singled out as much as you think
OMG
@cedar portal
look at the thrusters
I have a feeling that if Twitter still exists in 2028, which I doubt, then the people who do single out SpaceX might not do it as positively as some expect, while the majority of people who are happy just think "oh wow we went to the Moon again."
There's so many conspiracies out there about the government trying to stop SpaceX, I'm getting so sick of it. If it all is still around by 2028 and people still calling that out I swear I'm gonna start shooting left right and center
Weird Elon stans will praise it as a massive achievement for SpaceX above all else, misguided Twitter leftists will say that we should cancel Artemis just because Elon's name is on it, and a majority of regular people will not give the time of day to either of those viewpoints as usual.
yeah the government usually is more concerned with keeping the underclass suppressed and enforcing capitalist norms on people than trying to make itself look good compared to industry
Something something right-wing persecution fetish
That's honestly all it is
I fucking can't wait for Monday's flyby
I'm thinking about the Earth Rise views we'll get
And I just can't wait
We polled GO today to send @NASA_Orion on a powered fly-by approximately 80 miles above the surface of the Moon! Tune in to coverage of the maneuver on Monday, Nov 21 at 7:15 AM ET on https://t.co/olv5xmIEoG.
400
Go Go Go
2/ The flight direct then added, “And for that matter we can also fly past the moon without slowing down and head back to Earth. You hear me!?”
hahaha
Morse code
why does the window look dirty
If you reverse it spells Charlie
Possibly a refence to Charlie Blackwell Thompson
I translated it a couple of minutes after it was posted
Credit to smart people for figuring out to reverse it
Also just to note NASA did say there would be Easter eggs in the capsule
me, I am the smart person, all credit to me
no
I did figure out to reverse it tho 😔
This message above me, fish react it
I have been fish reacted
Having completed its main job of pushing @NASA_Orion to the Moon, the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage separates from the Orion spacecraft. All future maneuvers will be performed by thruster on Orion’s European Service Module. https://go.nasa.gov/3EoV4Oz
BABE WAKE UP
NEW ARTEMIS ONE FOOTAGE JUST DROPPED
I AM AWAKE
Orio
full orbital mechanic speed ahead!
uncompressed
@cedar portal
Nice
Latest Artemis 1 update from NASA notes they have two anomaly resolution teams active, one dealing with a star tracker issue (different from the dazzling previously reported) and another working on a solar array power unit. Neither seems major. https://t.co/DgW5nI2I6K
this was the first time an RL10 engine has flown from LC-39
みなさま、応援ありがとうございます。残念ながら、
現在、探査機からの電波は受信できていません。
588
184
fuck
今日の夜中までが月面着陸についてはラストチャンスになります。長期戦になる覚悟も必要ですが、今晩までは着陸について万全の準備をしていきます。
847
212
Not omotenashi 
Snoopy is in there no?
Experience the sounds of NASA's Artemis 1 mission and see what it’s like to witness the first SLS launch up close! Grab some headphones, it really makes a difference.
We've collected our favorite audio moments from our cameras and microphones positioned around NASA Kennedy Space Center, including one remote recording setup only 350 meters from...
wait, live coverage starts at 10:15 UTC?
Watch live as NASA's Orion spacecraft performs a close approach of the lunar surface on its way to a distant retrograde orbit, a highly stable orbit thousands of miles beyond the Moon. During the Artemis I flight test, launched on Nov. 16, Orion will travel 280,000 miles (450,000 km) from Earth and 40,000 miles (64,000 km) beyond the far side of...
Holy it's at mon
I still love this pair of images

Flat moon
I hope they put some epic high res cameras on there
Would be nice to get some new pics from the back side of the moon
When land camera on moon
That would be pretty cool. Drop a gopro and some solars down there and have a 24/7 stream of earth from the moons surface
Discovered yesterday that DSN 34meter dishes can handle greater bandwidth than previously analyzed so this will allow more live video streaming and imagery downlink. https://t.co/lIjS6xVHLb will start carrying the feed at all times (sorry there will still be some gaps).
yes
Its getting really close now
3.65k miles
I think it will be there in about an hour
I sleep then

We are so lucky to have such a pretty blue moon for our rock
Loss of signal as Orion goes behind the Moon as seen from Earth. The outbound powers flyby maneuver will take place during this 34-minute blackout period.
🫡

Hello 8 billion people on that small sphere in the distance
Crazy
Bro did the sun destroy the camera?
no it's me
現時点では、当初予定していた着陸方法は実行できないのですが、本日中に回復できれば、近月点(月に最も近いところ)を通過する際に固体ロケットで減速して、月面に自由落下させることができます。
近月点通過は、日本時間の今晩、24時付近です。
917
280
The little guy looks like he won't be able to land.
Another Wallpaper
No Dolphins so bad wallpaper
Isn't this also the first Splashdown from beyond LEO in over 50 years or something?
Yep
I guess milestones would be:
-First crew rated Vehicle to leave LEO in 50 years
-Farthest a Crew rated Vehicle went from Earth
-First Splashdown from beyond LEO in over 50 years
-First Flight of SLS
-First orbital flight of Orion
-2nd mission of the Artemis program
-Most Powerful rocket? (Current)
Is that correct?
Yeah
-The farthest a crew-capable vehicle has ever gone from Earth.
I would only change the second one a little
Engrish
Isn't this also the only crew rated Vehicle that uses solar power to leave LEO?
Not over 50 years
Just about though
Wait wtf
TIME
HOW IS IT 2022
I thought it was 48 years from Apollo 17
It is actually 50, wtf
Wasn't there an orbital flight in 2014ish?
Didn't go beyond LEO
Oh wait you
I was confused
Yes that's correct
oh wow
did saturn I never fly from 39 ?
#artemis1 POV SRB seperation
Here is the angle looking UP the stack from the base of the core stage. That little dot at the bottom? That's the moon.
@cedar portal
More evidence to prove my double Miranda theory
So when will the footage of closest approach be released?
I guess it takes time for the DSN to get all the data?
Saturn IB flew from 39B using the "milkstool" on the three Skylab missions and ASTP
yeah but IB didn't have rl 10s
yeah i just looked it up
Your right the S-IV had RL-10s while the S-IVB had a J-2
Skitzophrenia
Alright, regardless of my immense dislike of SLS... This is super fucking cool
Booster seps are always awesome
Cloning
Miranda was replaced
By who tho
By Palmer
*she
Engineers have activated Callisto, a technology demonstration payload aboard @NASA_Orion developed by Lockheed Martin, Amazon, & Cisco that will test a digital voice assistant and video conferencing capabilities in a deep space environment.
Follow along: https://t.co/B5VIfBv3F1
It’s not an Alexa 
it says Alexa in the picture?
Lockheed Martin 
There is hardware and software from Alexa
alexa's voice recognition is ass ime and it's context analysis is even worse
also at least one guy involved calls it Alexa
They all suck
oh also it's alexa on device lmaoooo
I have great success with google

comparatively anyway
I rarely use siri
Orion guy is the one involved
what's funny is that Callisto was activated awhile ago
"Alexa, how do I stop burning up in the atmosphere?"
all well and good until you're in an apollo 13 type situation and alexa keeps thinking you're speaking to her
also yeah this application of the tech is just as asinine as it is in the smart home nonsense
I doubt any astronaut would use it
If they have a concern just ask Mission Control
its more to access an onboard database
but I can't see it being a super mega useful thing
so its just an assistant
it would be super useful when they're like
behind the Moon
or an area where there's a bit of comms delay
Alright
just sounds like someone didn't know how to design a user interface
If they don’t know how to use the mfds maybe
sometimes they have they're hands full
didn't someone say it's not flying on a3
dude could be taking a shit in the bathroom and have a question
or am I misremembering
Callisto isn't flying on anything unless NASA likes it
I hope they don’t
Snoopy
same lmao
i can see the benefits of it for just being an assistant
but with all things like that it'll be relied on for a while until the astronauts complain enough for a standard ux
and by relied on I mean the execs will be like yes this is such a good idea!
there's gonna be both
it weighs like 4-5 pounds its not that much dead weight
its just a quality of life thing if the astros and execs like it
Yeah it’s not much literal dead weight, it’s more metaphorical dead weight on the interface and the minds of astronauts
I think the fact that you’re including the execs in that statement tells all one needs to know about this particular application
?
swear I've had like one opinion in this server that's been unanimously agreed on
and -1 opinions in this channel
execs like program managers
Execs like Amazon managers
Amazon didn't have much a role to play on this
blue origin's foot in the door
they're literally providing voice recognition tech
it is literally space Alexa
onion ❤️
Why does it have spikes?
they provided processing software
Fire side of the moon
Callisto also allows video call on the interface which is cool
*far
probably helps to mount the insulation?
couldn't they just have got that elsewhere
yes.
they took an Ipad and put it on the console
simple as fuck
how good is orion's earth downlink that they can connect directly to a webex meeting
Good view of the sea of Moscow
pretty good
FAM moment
iPads in spacecraft is not a new technology that deserves a fancy name lol
2mb/s I guess
fair
omg gib high res
need
NASA logo orbit do be spinnin' wild
High-resolution photo of Orion
Oh fuck
The Apollo Vibes are so fucking strong right now
Holy shit
No wonder Orion limits acceleration when the panels are deployed
Those things look unbelievably flimsy
To not be that flimsy
solar panels tend to be like that
They are big long and not structural
long
Artemis 0
Wouldn't Arex I-X been Artemis -1?
Ares V better plus ratio
Ares I-X would be a nonreal number
Like i
Apollo would be -idk
Do not taint Apollo with this bullshit lmao
what did ares 1-x even achieve
wasn't it just a 4 segment solid
with a dummy upper stage & capsule
Yes
It was supposed to become a crew vehicle after that
Fortunately someone pulled their head out of their ass
damn, but did it even test components of the actual ares I?
Nope
It did not
well thats one way to waste 400 million dollars or something i guess
The government wastes far more than that on far stupider things on a daily basis
¯_(ツ)_/¯
found this image
What's funny is that Ares I would probably have been a fucking death trap if it flew crew, even compared to the Shuttle. The crew would be killed by the gees almost invariably if the abort motors ever went off. On top of an old Shuttle SRB, those famously reliable rockets.
Shuttle SRBs were pretty reliable tho weren't they?
Less emphasis on "Shuttle" than on "SRB"
Flying crew on a vehicle solely propelled by solids is a terrible idea
Jeb says otherwise
Jeb Bush?
KSP
I've launched him on more solid rockets than liquid
Cannot disagree on that, but the 4 segments srbs are pretty reliable
I'm sorry, I'm not knowledgeable in KSP memes
Fair
Oh it wasn't a KSP meme it was just a dumb joke about a politician named Jeb Bush
lol
Hot take but flying crew on a vehicle propelled by solids in a significant capacity at all isn't the greatest idea. Obviously it makes sense in applications with a limited budget as are commonplace currently, but it should be avoided if possible. Having people on top of a rocket that you physically cannot turn off once started is just risky on the face of it.
lmao
hot take - Ares is sexy enough to be allowed to fly with astronauts
Bruh
its purpose was to do a real wind tunnel test
Oh I see
Didn't it get cancelled before it even flew lol
🤝 
Shockingly few people agree with that statement
Ares I-X flew
I know, that's what I said
It flew after the program was cancelled I think
Lemme double check
Ah I dunno then
Ares I program was winding down to be cancelled when Ares I-X flew
They determined it’d be cheaper to fly it than to destack and find somewhere to put it
Lmao this is not what I'd expect from NASA
i swear Ares I-X was like $400mil
Ares 1-X real purpose was to just try and show Congress that Constellation actually created a product or something
Constellation only really had like, two lunar robotic missions and Ares 1-X come out of it
What robotic missions?
LRO and LCROSS i think
Ah makes sense
meanwhile Artemis already has 2 missions under its belt and has at least ten lined up
Nice
Technically an earthset
also during nominal missions past artemis ii there will be no earthrise
at least not for orion
Yup
MISSION UPDATE: #CAPSTONE is now in the operational phase of its pathfinding mission around the Moon!
As the first spacecraft to fly this ellongated orbit around the Moon known as NRHO, learn how CAPSTONE is forging a path for future #Artemis missions: https://t.co/NlijGL2gbd
359
elongated
Muskrat
this is insane
these pics go hard
Here at Johnson Space Center where the Artemis I briefing has been delayed to 5:30 pm ET (22:30 UTC) ... but for good reason! We're going to see high-resolution video from today's activities.

NASA news conference from the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston to discuss Orion’s lunar flyby as part of the Artemis I mission, as well as update on post-launch assessments of the Space Launch System rocket and exploration ground systems. Participants:
Mike Sarafin, Artemis I mission manager, NASA Headquarters
Judd Frieling, flight dir...
according to the briefing SLS performance was spot on
the core stage was off by 2 meters per second
which is amazing
ML FOOTAGE
hydrolox moment
indeed
SLS performance was "Eye-watering" per Mike Sarafin. Ground support all passed too.
ML-1 drone video post-launch. Looks like ITAR office is A-OK now.
SLS be like
looks like a tornado went through
It's an image
this does not seem nominal
Well yeah you gotta go to the link to see the video duh
The image is a screenshot I took because it wouldn't show an embed
embed fail
NASA Press Conference on #Artemis progress: will be taking photos of the #Apollo landing sites on second flyover. 😱🚨 SCREAMING 😱🎉 YES!!! SHOW ME THAT KNOCKED OVER, CRUMBLY, BLEACHED OUT AMERICAN FLAG! LETS GOOOOO! 🚀🚀🚀 #Orion #WeAreGoing
221
what
oh hell ya
the images will be high enough res?
what
real
real
💤
Legends
that sure is something
nah the Orion guy that is in the server shared it with us
You're right. The SRBs weren't an engineering decision but a political decision
well it has less SRB that some rockets flying now so I don't see why not
tory bruno likes to tell you that there aren’t many places in which cutting off thrust actually helps safety but I don’t think he’s an impartial judge of the situation and I think he is minimising the cases that it does indeed help
look at all the brown grass on the north side of the pad
And it's not the only part of the pad that's brown
The whole area around the top of the ramp is brown
Wonder what Artemis would look like if nasa got a military budget
Also does this Orion CM have a name
no
Why not
isn't flying crew so no crew to name it
Oh
The video was removed
Is there a camera filming core stage separation I wonder
Surely
still there for me
Could you pass it another way?
Maybe you download it and send it, if it's too heavy, you upload it to the cloud.
Well, I'll download it tomorrow, thanks.
500mb nitro trial
Calypso be like: "am I a joke to you"
I will not answer that question
Calypso has a crew manifested for it
No? I can open it well
I was able to see it
Calypso wouldn't be able to tell me what date it is
I enjoy our AI overlords
however
like humans
I dislike some
on the bright side if you ask alexa "what's the craic" she goes "the craic is 90"
what am I meant to know
My reaction
Person doesn't think NASA would possibly be stupid enough to fly the capsule without ECLSS again
Meanwhile that's exactly what they did
EFT-1 and A1 both had to ECLSS
The former is excusable, it was a super rough boilerplate
But A1? That shit should be installed
so many SLS shills are like no it'll be fine
my brother in christ when is it ever fine to not test stuff
starliner had a fucking clock malfunction
I don't care how many ground tests you've done, whether that be for the Orion ECLSS or the LAS. If you're gonna do an all-up test, do the fucking all-up test
The entire point of this mission was to prove the entire system and all its components are safe for humans
well yeah you can't effectively test a CO2 scrubber but like
why not have them on board
(I have a feeling what I'm saying now will be discounted with "you're just salty" or "cope" or "stop hating" or something stupid like that, but if you stop to think about it for HALF A FUCKING SECOND it makes ZERO sense to do an all-up test to prove safety for humans without actually doing the testing)
precisely
I mean, you can release probably release CO2 from a canister or something to test it
that's what I was thinking
And that's what they did


