Whitehart, Loggers point and Settler creeks combined into a COTW map. (I have a dream)

[stuck prawn]

Okay hear me out, very simple. Make a map where you essentially combine Whitehart island, Loggers point and Settler creeks into a reworked big map like you guys did with Hirschfelden, basically just make the stuff bigger. Then, take the species already present in the old maps but add more of the ones that naturally have the geographical area that it is supposed to represent in real life.

Pros:
+More whitetail maps
+Crazy Nostalgia (bussing)
+Fun
+Blacktails
Cons:
0

If you disagree then you havent even spent a single century on settler creeks mmmkay

[slim dirge]

Not a terrible idea

[gray river]

So layton and Mississippi?

Dont see anything that new or interesting that can warrant it being a dlc map if it is one, unless they add a bunch of species that werent there before i dont personally see the appeal

[raw grove]

I absolutely love this idea, but I think it would be better to incorporate them as free maps.

[stuck prawn]

Hey thanks man :)

[stuck prawn]

Its for nostalgia 🥀

[stuck prawn]

How is it Mississippi?...

[regal sail]

Loggers point is a good map for the classic. Nothing more. If devs will do this for cotw we don't even recognize this map. Because they will add big lakes for grind.

[stuck prawn]

Well i hate grinding, its not hunting. So a plus for me! 👍

[gray river]

I mean that species wise, nothing new nothing unique
And nostalgia shouldn't carry a reserve lmao.
Look how vurhonga turned out

[raw grove]

I think you’re misinterpreting what Vlad is saying. He’s saying that we won’t be able to recognise it as Loggers point/settlers creek/whitehart because large lakes would be added to accommodate for grinders. So it wouldn’t be a plus.

[raw grove]

Yeah there would be nothing new. Tbh it’s more of a Layton x NEM kinda thing, because of the Bobcats and pheasants. That’s why I said that I would be better as a free map that comes with a paid map. Maybe to celebrate 20 years of classic in 2029?

[stuck prawn]

Haha yeah man but thats what i dont want, lakes and stuff. I say just keep it exactly as it is and dont care about lake grinders, i think its an abuse of game mechanics and should be rooted out. Its a hunting game not counter strike aim trainer. But yeah i totally understand you guys point its just that you guys are being realistic with where the game is NOW, but i am dreaming about the game becoming unpredictable and random again like classic... Like real hunting, where people do not have an unfair advantage. Grind hunting is actually even worse than high fence hunting in real life and high fence hunting trophies are heavily disrespected irl. Just ranting rn sorry.

[raw grove]

Eh to each their own I guess, grinding is pretty fun in my opinion and great ones definitely help make your lodge prettier imo.

[gray river]

And optional ☝️you could still have lakes and not hunt them imo lakes add to the natural feel of the maps

[stuck prawn]

yes!

[regal sail]

I have a pretty powerful PC but really enjoy graphics of the hunter classic. Render distance is bad. Shadows have a problem with half tone. FPS only 60. Everything else is very very good. Devs could do remaster of the same map with the new modern features. But it's unreal. Because code is very old.