Patches based on community decisions

[manic trellis]

NO (edit : I am strictly abiding by the OP Post Rules, hence why my answer is strictly limited to the term "no" as of now)

[livid sand]

This is very debatable

[blazing lily]

Okay, let me clarify, I mean in specific parts of an update. Not a general "do you want this or that" I mean more like.

"Do you feel like the birds are working well or do they need a change to (A) or (B)

[foggy shore]

YES

[livid light]

That would be like revealing the roadmap, it won't happen, they have already refused to show it.
The community always looks for the easiest way, they have become accustomed to the grind, however there is a vision of the game that the developers aspire to, if they do not agree with how users use a mechanic they just change it.

[blazing lily]

I think it's more that people are still bitter about how the first weapon poll was done. Zero information in a time that the discord was bloated from free weekends. None of the regular players got a real say in it and we just barely got two decent guns.

Anyway, this thread is dead so I'm deleting the OP. No point in causing more friction when the updates are already causing fires.

[livid sand]

But it’s not the same to announce a DLC with backfilling of new species or new weapons as it is to announce a hotfix or patch that generates debate between grinders and casuals. It’s true that it seems the case of the weapon pack worked well.

[blazing lily]

Let it die.

[charred marsh]

No, and alot of others dont think so either, its just the people who are happy with the change are very vocal about it