#Yak's a little to aggressive

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

gilded verge
#

i think the Yak's have inherited the pre patch waterbuffalo levels of aggression. i just got attacked for no reason by a Yak whilst reading a Poi. there was nothing within sight when i interacted with the Poi and whilst in the menu reading i was trampled to death by a Yak, there where no warnings i just got hit twice in rapid succession i did not even get a chance to close the menu and found myself forced to repawn.

heavy niche
#

Agreed, yaks too angry!

royal ferry
#

No, they're not. Also this belongs in Feedback.

harsh sage
#

Yeah a little bit more aggressive but it might sound funny but I kinda enjoy it

lofty steeple
#

I agree, Yaks irl aren't this agressive

deep cargo
gilded verge
deep cargo
west carbon
#

so much so! i should not have to shoot every single yak and buffalo i see just because ill die if i dont.

deep cargo
#

A water buffalo is a water buffalo, the moment you set foot in its territory, then you’ve already established case definition of provocation to many kinds of species.

west carbon
# deep cargo A water buffalo is a water buffalo, the moment you set foot in its territory, th...

this does not help anyone.... #1. this is not IRL.

#2 this is a game meant to be enjoyed while being somewhat realistic not 100% realistic.

#3. being repeatedly killed every 5m IS NOT FUN FOR ANYONE!!!

#4. THE ENTIRE MAP IS THEIR TERRITORY! how do you propose we stay out of their territory when we are not specifically hunting them?

#5. if you think this is normal IRL behavior you are never allowed to go to Yellowstone or any other national park of any kind with any species of animal ever again for obvious reasons. you will be killed instantly.

deep cargo
west carbon
# deep cargo Sounds rather subjective to me. 🤷‍♂️

some of it is. but most of it is fact. for example the game is meant to be fun. its not supposed to be 100% realistic. the entire map is their territory. getting murdered a lot is universally not fun." these are facts. the rest might be subjective but i feel my point stands. the important part is that you at least understand what im trying to say? also i would still love to know how you propose we avoid them when they are everywhere seeing as that is kind of a very important thing to know given that you are passively implying change is not needed.

deep cargo
# west carbon some of it is. but most of it is fact. for example the game is meant to be fun. ...

Please do not miss quote me like you have in this last correspondence.

At no point have I said what you have said is wrong, I made my original observation about water Buffalo independently and not in reply to anyone specific.

As for what I propose, nothing. I don’t owe you anything and I have no tissues for your apparent issues.

I do not oppose your point of view, I’ve observed it.

Not a priority or modus.