#back fills versus new map?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

solid oracle
#

Hello, I have seen a some posts on back fills on previous maps. As stated in streams many times back fills reduce the animals allowed on maps which would reduce the chances of someone trying to grind for the GO since there is so many animals allowed per map.

I personally would rather have a new map with new species than the time it would take for back fills to be done. I am hoping there could be a survey on the subject from EW, and perhaps people could voice their opinions here on discord in regards to the matter.

unborn vale
#

We have 14 maps and some of those could really do with a backfill.

dapper aspen
#

The backfill we last had I think worked wonders, another backfill would breathe more life into the game so I'm all for it. Personally I want Dall Sheep in Yukon and squirrels but even current species backfill would be great.

midnight blaze
jovial quartz
#

The studio needs to add great content 2 times a year that has a greater value than the other 2 remaining, it is its form of financing...
If they replace new maps with backfills then we would have to pay $7 to add new or existing species to maps we already paid for before, I have no problem with it but I'm sure most users would explode with complaints..
New content is never free :S

calm linden
#

I Don’t See A Reason Why We Couldn’t Get A New Map And A Backfill In The Same Update (Assuming The Backfill Is For Species Already In Game).

midnight blaze
solid oracle
#

I did forget about the older maps that originally didn’t have the variety of lineups as some of the newer maps have with the different species. One had like 16, didn’t it? Between the animals and birds. Hmmm got me thinking..lol.

final needle
#

All for economic support for the devs, new maps with highly requested species.