pvp suggestion

[stable pawn]

I get most people dont want it but all I want is a setting you can toggle to enable it, me and my friend will find it more fun and i can think of a few friends who would buy it if it had pvp, not a gamemode just the ability to shoot others

[west void]

Shooting others, definitely not, more competition yes.
Considering that things like traps are not added for being unethincal how would they add PvP

[stable pawn]

But like it doesnt have to be a thing thats always on

Just an option for people to opt in or something because it will just make it more fun for me and prob some others

[waxen delta]

i would love shooting people and seeing how well i did defienlty good suggestion

[stable pawn]

There doesnt have to be rewards, just for the meme

[weary barn]

Yeah, that’s never happening

[stable pawn]

Like if someone gets a heart shot you keel over and die and you can also sniff them out so you can tell if somebody is coming if no scent elminiator, this would also add human mating calls and human scent

[waxen delta]

would make it more realistic, one time i went hunting in nevada with my late uncle, i accidently misfired a bullet in his toe, this would make it more risk taking and dynamic experience.

[stable pawn]

This will also allow the new maps to come out like cities where you can go around on a rampage killing innocent civilians which would be realistic like modern day america

You can also allow visas into the game where if you were illegally in the country or poaching you would be captured by border patrol and have to bare 20 years in prison

[west void]

I can see how funny some sessions could end up being, just don't think it aligns with EWs view

[weary barn]

Seeing your other suggestion it’s clear this isn’t a serious suggestion

[stable pawn]

this one is serious tho i just think it would be a fun idea if you could opt in and me and my friend could just shoot each other if we feel like it

[weary barn]

That’s never gonna happen with EW running the show

[stable pawn]

i mean its a game and it would definitely increase sales to the game

[quasi glen]

This is a hunting game that tries to align with real and legal hunting mechanics, if you want to shoot people look for another game

[weary barn]

Call of duty, Fortnite, pubg, etc

[stable pawn]

ye but what if i want both its not a thing thats forced or anything like u dont have to if u dont want to but its just a fun idea

[weary barn]

It still doesn’t fit in the game

[burnt iris]

I would like to shoot a player to harvest it and get a diamond score.

[stable pawn]

i mean its a realistic game so its unrealistic if you try shooting someone and it says "invalid target"

[weary barn]

That’s different. You go try shooting someone irl and see what happens

[quasi glen]

I don't see anything fun in shooting another hunter during a hunting session

[stable pawn]

well i see its fun, because its a game it would be funny if me and my friend got in a argument and then decided to duel it out

[glacial tundra]

I don’t think shooting others hunters is a good example of hunting ethics and safety

[weary barn]

Maybe you think it’d be fun, but EW doesn’t. End of the story

[stable pawn]

and its not something u need to do so if u dont find it fun dont do it, and its a stupid thing to say its not safety when your shooting bears and minecraft doesnt add sharks because you can attack, like ur not attacking any other animals

[weary barn]

huh

[glacial tundra]

just go play cod

[stable pawn]

but can u hunt in cod

[burnt iris]

It’s hunting simulator game… you not supposed to shoot humans…

[weary barn]

You can hunt in cotw and shoot people in cod. 🤯

[stable pawn]

again just cuz its a hunting game doesnt mean it cant be added as a option for fun

[burnt iris]

…..

[weary barn]

🤦‍♂️

[stable pawn]

this game has cool shooting mechanics cuz its not just spray the other person

[weary barn]

Good thing this game is never getting combat then

[stable pawn]

it doesnt need to be fully fleshed out or anything it can literally just be an option to be able to shoot others for the purpose of fun

[weary barn]

Why would you consider that fun 🤦‍♂️

[stable pawn]

because its a game if your just playing you shoot your friend for fun and laugh about it

[burnt iris]

Actually it’s going to be good if they add pvp, so I can knock out players that are hunting near me

[weary barn]

That’d make me upset. I don’t wanna get killed while trying to hunt

[stable pawn]

and that doesnt have to be a thing thats always enabled it can be some thing in the settings to enable pvp for urself not serverwide like i said

[quasi glen]

I see that you don't understand what theHunter:CotW is about, but if you are determined to support your suggestion you should look for countries, governments or hunting grounds where it is legal to shoot other people or where legal permits are obtained to do so, that is the way which we make suggestions for new content

[weary barn]

Also, take a look at your reactions and see how much support you have 😂

[stable pawn]

... this game isnt exactly real life why would you have perks or skills.

[weary barn]

You learn more as you hunt more irl…

[stable pawn]

but this isnt irl and the audience it would attract by simply adding an option

[glacial tundra]

there’s a difference between less aim wobble and shooting other people

[weary barn]

It wouldn’t attract as big of an audience as you think. In fact, it’d quite possibly deter more people from playing

[stable pawn]

if u dont want pvp u dont have to enable it but for the people that do they can enable it for fun i dont see the problem?

[glacial tundra]

because it’s a very stupid idea

[quasi glen]

All content added to the game is based on legal game locations, hunting weapons and game aspecies. That's the EW way of doing it.

[weary barn]

It’s a hunting game, not call of duty…

[stable pawn]

idc if its not call of duty its just a fun idea which not everyone has to use.

[weary barn]

The 20 people who disliked it disagree with that statement

[stable pawn]

ok but ur not EW or whatver

[glacial tundra]

I like how you are acting like there isn’t enough shooting in this game

[weary barn]

But I know EW. Clearly you don’t

[waxen delta]

they could add this tiny bit of land https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hECaXfk2Wo4&t=25s as a reserve for pvp

[glacial tundra]

you just go to a water source and shoot everything and the animal ai is pretty stupid anyways, no point in shooting other people

[stable pawn]

well its a game and they can do anything they want its not like its strictly following the laws and everything like what is the campaign of silver rdige peaks theres a nuclear meltdown?

[weary barn]

Nuclear meltdown? 🤣

[glacial tundra]

you’re actually slow

[stable pawn]

its not the point that its enough shooting animals its literally just a funny idea and would create some fun memories, and again you dont have to have it enabled

[weary barn]

Again, EW will never add it

[stable pawn]

you can get mauled by a bear, drown urself, fall off a cliff and break your legs and might aswell have an option to shoot others for fun

[weary barn]

might aswell kill people

[quasi glen]

I already said it above but EW relies on real hunting laws to add its content to the game

[glacial tundra]

why are you comparing being attacked by an animal and shooting them back with the idea of shooting other hunters

[weary barn]

Why can’t you just accept reality? it won’t happen

[stable pawn]

well idrc if it happens its a suggestion and i think its a fun idea, you hate it enough your spending time on arguing on what ew would decide

[weary barn]

I’m not arguing, I’m giving facts

[quasi glen]

Even EW doesn't want animals to kill us, that's why they gave us a 10mm pistol with 15 shots to defend ourselves 😅

[stable pawn]

its a game

[glacial tundra]

why the fuck would a game promote taking ethical shots on animals (harvest check) but then let you murder others hunters

[runic ferry]

You mean spent uranium mine…

[primal falcon]

DayZ exist: You can hunt other players, you can hunt animals and pop zombies as a bonus

[stable pawn]

again ur arguing whether you want it or not and if u dont u dont need it enabled who cares if its ethical enough in a game

[weary barn]

It’s not about wanting it, it’s about it won’t happen

[glacial tundra]

again stop being a fucking idiot and believing that EW would actually consider this idea

[stable pawn]

so if it wont happen why bother spending time "giving facts".

[primal falcon]

Their is also GTA 5 which allows you to shoot random people and animals with all manner of weapons
Did I also mention the Far Cry series yet, those games let you shoot animals and people

[weary barn]

Because I have time to waste
which is exactly what I’m doing with this

[silver gazelle]

This has to be the goofiest suggestion in this channel lmao

[stable pawn]

the mechanics arent good enough in other games and its a fun idea in a game, where anything can happen, if u dont want u dont need it. PERSONALLY i want to be able to shoot my friendas and so do they

[weary barn]

Go find a company that supports that then 🤷‍♂️

[glacial tundra]

what the fuck are you talking about, the ballistics aren’t even really realistic in this game. go play something like insurgency sandstorm or arma

[runic ferry]

Red Dead Redemption also exists

[primal falcon]

Hence why I suggested DayZ

[stable pawn]

idc bout other games since i have this one and i also dont have a bunch of disposable income to spend on other games and its its a fun suggestion which you guys dont need to have enabled

[glacial tundra]

too bad their not adding it so you can go cry about it 🤣🤣🤣

[runic ferry]

Red dead online is like 9 bucks…

[primal falcon]

We don’t need that to be enabled
Also isn’t Fortnite free?

[weary barn]

Yep

[stable pawn]

ur point is stupid fortnite isnt hunting and none of the other games are based on hunting its not hard to add pvp its like an option and then just remove the "invalid target" thing.

[runic ferry]

We understand,and we find it stupid

[weary barn]

Seems like you need to lower your standards 😂

[stable pawn]

if u think pvp is stupid then u dont need it enabled i dont see how it can affect you at all if you ignore the option.

[glacial tundra]

the reason why fortnite isn’t a hunting game is because you don’t shoot 99 other fucking people when you try to kill an animal 🤯

[primal falcon]

It is a pointless update that would add a mountain of game breaking bugs

[weary barn]

Technically it is. It has chickens

[stable pawn]

which would not effect you at all if you just didnt enable it??? theres not much bugs about it its literally shoot other person wow they respawn like dying in other circumstances

[runic ferry]

My best suggestion is Red dead online it has your hunting and your murder all for 9.99

[glacial tundra]

or just stop being a complete fucking dumbass and play something else 🤯🤯🤯

[primal falcon]

And the wildlife behaviour is pretty good compared to Call of the Wild too

[weary barn]

You don’t realize how complicated this type of thing is…

[stable pawn]

alr im sure its not as complicated as everything else they add

[glacial tundra]

they ain’t adding it buddy just shut up 😂

[primal falcon]

It would be more complicated then you realize

[stable pawn]

im a programmer and adding pvp to a game is not difficult at all especially when its not fleshed out.

[glacial tundra]

copying a script off the internet into roblox studio isn’t programming buddy

[stable pawn]

ur point is "the developers wont add it so i completely despise it" ive also answered all of your points

[weary barn]

Except the fact EW won’t add it

[primal falcon]

I don’t see the point of including PvP into a game that focuses on hunting Animals, not People

[stable pawn]

LITERALLY WHAT I SAID. if u dont see the point in it you dont need it enabled in your mp servers

[weary barn]

This really is one of the dumbest suggestions I’ve seen

[runic ferry]

Dayz is looking real good right now bud

[primal falcon]

It would be a waste of an update

[glacial tundra]

I would say you’re trolling but I 100% believe that you are an actual dumbass

[stable pawn]

broooo who cares if its a waste of a update it can literally be added whenever i mean what have they been adding currently dlc's of new maps and maybe some gun dlcs whens the last time a game mechanic was added

[weary barn]

🤦‍♂️

[silver gazelle]

Because people actually want new maps and guns

[stable pawn]

and its not a hard thing to code into the game ESPECIALLY when you have a development team if you dont want it there is absolutely no reason why you should care for an option if some people would like it?

[weary barn]

You’re pretty stubborn aren’t ya? it. Won’t. Happen.

[runic ferry]

That’s taking away precious dev time from a Development company that likes to take it slow and safe

[glacial tundra]

there’s absolutely no reason for it to be an option and you are literally one of the two people that own this game that would want the devs to replace a new gun DLC with some buggy PVP update

[primal falcon]

A wasted update essentially

[stable pawn]

theres not gonna be a lawsuit because theres pvp why r u guys so mad because EW wont add it or its a waste of time. and its a minor option which would not be a update?

[glacial tundra]

dude, you’re idea is fucking stupid, end of the story

[primal falcon]

When did we say anything about a lawsuit

[stable pawn]

as if there isnt enough bugs anyway you can fling other people by tping, the map cuts off completely and random areas and you go flying if you crash into your dog?

[glacial tundra]

so encourage them to add more bugs because they already have bugs?!?! 🤯

[weary barn]

I have literally never heard of any of these 😂

[stable pawn]

why would the bugs effect you if you dont have pvp enabled, IF IT WOULD EVEN BE ANY BUGS its a simple thing to add, your dead set on if its added it will prob take like 5 months to add and it would also be incredibly buggy. I am a programmer

[weary barn]

That’s not how bugs work 🤦‍♂️ to be a “programmer” you sure seem knowledgeable about bugs…

[glacial tundra]

it’s not going to effect anyone because PVP won’t be added 🤣🤣

[stable pawn]

you clearly have a lot of time to spend on what EW would do when your playing their games its a suggestion and they can decide its not difficult to add at all there would be little bugs when they already have pve basically perfect.

[weary barn]

It’s not about time, it’s about their views. They’ve made it clear they don’t want ANYTHING like this in their game

[runic ferry]

You should probably delete this dude…

[glacial tundra]

the game is PVE for a reason

[stable pawn]

the game can stay pve their is no incentive for pvp no rewards no leaderboard nothing like that it is only an option for the purpose of some peoples fun in a video game which doesnt effect you in any way shape or form if you dotn decide to enable it

[runic ferry]

Nobody wants this option that’s the thing

[glacial tundra]

also why are you suggesting rocket launchers on another thread 💀

[stable pawn]

there is definitely people who would want pvp and you cant just say nobody. and the rocket launchers was a joke

[runic ferry]

Show of hands? Who wants this?

[glacial tundra]

you weren’t joking about rocket launchers 🤣

[burnt iris]

I don't support this idea either, but can you please stop arguing? It's just a suggestion. If the EW and enough players likes this it will be added, otherwise no. So stop pointless arguing.

I really don't see any point in these +200 messages, you're just making the suggestion go up.

[primal falcon]

Like PvP being added to a PvE game

[stable pawn]

show of hands for what? 20 people on discord seeing this instead of the thousands of people who have played the game.

[runic ferry]

Dude just get the memo through your thick neanderthal skull

[glacial tundra]

yet you seem to have a lower brain functionality than all the 12 year olds that play this game 🤣

[stable pawn]

your arguing for something that would not effect you at all where as some people would have fun in their own game.

[primal falcon]

Lets allow this suggestion to shrivel up and die, no point in keeping this up top

[stable pawn]

bro really repeated the exact same point that i answered and deleted it