#Some What Fictional Maps Eventually Added and Get Away a Little From True to Life but not absurdly
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
@stray fjord that's absurdly away 🤣
Not really, only a few tens of thousands of miles 🤷♂️
@stray fjord Moon deer G1 coming 🤣
Maybe even if it's not for a new map. It could even be for backfilling. We could put some animals that have small numbers of population on a backfilled map just because they are there but they have really low numbers or are somewhat close to the area. It would just allow to get some animals added on other reserves that if we stick 100 percent true to life they wouldn't be. Just my thought. I'm sure some will disagree.
This game was created under the premise of Recreating Real Hunting Scenarios, following the Real Life Hunting Regulations, so far it has done well, I see no reason to change
@river oak I just think it Hurts the possibilities. I haven't been around or played as long as you but I have seen several reserves that could have been better with some other animals added but because they didn't live within true to life distance but was somewhat close it didn't happen. I agree they have done well but could it be better ?
I think it's enough with the local hunting species on the map, the realism of the reserve is what stands out the most from the game.
However, until now only the Big Game and Small Game have been contemplated, that's why many of the Furbearer Hunting species are not included, I hope that one day with some modality of Seasonal Hunting they can be introduced, each map has its own mixed species category