#Great additions to single and multiplayer to highly consider!!!!

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

red rover
#

-Allow friends to ride on a dual seater ATV. Some friends don't have the DLC. It's cool they can acquire it if I'm hosting from their storage but it would be better to ride on the same ATV rather than separate from each other in most cases.
-Adding stance in the game would be great for both single and multiplayer. Showing standing, crouching, sitting, and prone positions.
-Bipods! Bipods! Bipods! Please add them and consider them for single and multiplayer. A lot of weapons have railing systems and the fact I cant attach equipment is a downer and ridiculous. Flash lights, pak15 laser sight and a bipod or tripod.
-Add more species of animals and weather effects to the game. Make it adaptive and realistic. I feel its lacking and would make the game even better. So much more potential to this game I just got into. Pretty awesome so far.
-When riding on a vehicle such as the ATV and a small-medium size animal runs into me as I'm driving I should be able to inflict some kind of damage if not completely kill it from the impact. Pretty ridiculous a small/medium deer, boar, fox, etc can continue unscathed while I take damage, nearly at the brink of death. Please adjust that so its realistic.
-Camouflage and certain clothing should impact animal detection. Guile suit for example would work better in some scenarios' over others for example in terms of scent, noise, vision awareness from the animal, and mobility.

  • Resting should cost a lot less in a tent than at an outpost.
  • Add more breed of dogs to use and improve hunting dog AI.
    -Improve older reserves and improve on the newer ones. A lot of bugs and issues I'm sure previous players have submitted.
  • Resting weapon on rocks, fence posts, ridges, should be a thing in the game. Not sure why its hasn't been added yet if bipods are not available.
    -Vaulting over rocks, fencing, bushes, and other aspects in reserves that people can vault over should be a thing. Its pretty pathetic I cant vault over anything really.
normal quail
#

Lot to go over.

  1. A dual seater ATV would be a decently nice QoL feature for MP hunting
  2. If you mean an indicator for indicating the hunter’s current stance then yeah that would be nice, though I don’t feel it’s as necesssry considering the game goes off of visibility based on position in brush, undergrowth, in a blind, etc
  3. I truly don’t think we need a MW level gunsmith. Laser sights are completely unneeded as they would provide simply no substantial benefit, neither would flash lights due to the hunter already having a headlamp. As for bipods, they kinda full under the suppressor category of “no reason not to carry them” and would be difficult to balance.
  4. New species are being added with major content drop, saying “add new species to the game” is like saying “add new guns to the game”.
  5. Weather doesn’t need to be any more complex than it currently is. A rain and fog system that helps mask the hunter’s sound and visibility slightly is all that we really need. Besides, most of the playerbase finds rain and fog obnoxious so I’m not sure how well that would go over
  6. There’s a reason you can’t roadkill in the game. If it was added as a feature it should provide zero cash, zero XP and zero weapon score completely, along with having a medal equivalent to None saying “roadkill”
  7. It’s too late in the game’s development to add a camouflage system unfortunately, I believe it was confirmed by Jaxy himself
  8. It already does cost less to rest in a tent.
  9. Sam’s situation as “add more species.” It’s inevitable that it’s gonna happen
  10. Again, saying “fix current and old bugs” is like saying “add more species.” It’s already happening.
  11. Detecting when a player has their weapon over a surface is harder to implement than you’d think, especially if it wasn’t something implemented early into the development of the gunplay
  12. Why do you need to vault over rocks and other objects? Is it really that paramount you go over a rock and not around it?
stone zealot
#

Since like you can jump over 80% of everything that's almost as tall as you why is there a need for vaulting? When you can jump

red rover
#

@normal quail well for vaulting I was nearly killed by a European bison and had to spam the jump button to just get over a rock that was probably knee high. Should of been easier for me to vault over it with ease to do evasive maneuvers to avoid being trampled by the animal. Fortunately I managed to fire 2 more rounds and kill it before it ended up right in from of me. Bipods would be nice to have to set the weapon down for better stability and without it going all over the place even if I hold my breath. @stone zealot 80% isn't enough. Should be higher. Never sell yourself short. I rather road kill be worthless than take health away depending on the size and speed I was traveling. A mini map is available on a phone in game. But would be nice it would stay open while driving from one location to another

dull field
red rover
#

😂 well it can be redone

#

Dont know why it cant be readded. Making a tripod stand, bipods, and vaulting. Have to make a racket and struggle to just get over a small ledge or pile or rocks.

sand raft
#

The problem with adding all your suggestions in one post is that if there are one or two that people dont like you get down voted .... better to break them up ... Check to make sure that they havent already been suggested ....

red rover
#

I guess, but had so much didnt want to forget

#

So threw them all of them in a big list. People who down voted havent been hunting then. Or know whats available to them if they did.

marsh parrot
red rover
#

Too old for camo? How so?

lilac sequoia
# red rover Too old for camo? How so?

The game is too old to be making complete reworks of how the game is played (cross play for example). It’s a major change to the game and it will likely cause an obscene amount of bugs, hypothetically assuming they could do it in the first place

marsh parrot
#

Only thing is that they could make a second version of this game on a better engine as well. Then render distance, camo, and all those things could be improved and added.

red rover
#

Lol or a major overhaul update. Its not impossible. Other games have been done the same way. This game would be no different

lilac sequoia
red rover
#

Well of course. Devs will be earning that paycheck and getting the game up to par with its competitors and modern gaming experience. It'll be fine. If they want more money and people playing. Money can move mountains. Im sure its been on the table to consider it

sand raft
#

The only problem with this thinking is that COTW is already making more money and has more players than it's closest competition. So why should they change ???

dull field
#

If they shouldn't change, whats the point of having suggestions and feedback?

red rover
#

lmao for real dude. People set on just having the same material. No modding or expanding of ideas or flavors to a game we just want to be better than it is already.

sand raft
# dull field If they shouldn't change, whats the point of having suggestions and feedback?

Think for a moment ... Obviously I wasn't talking about changes in general because there are many changes that COTW devs make .... But @red rover is comparing COTW to that other game implying that COTW should head in that direction of being a more realistic hunting game.... Why should they change to do that???? Why should COTW change to be more like that other game when they already have a larger player following ???? In reality the other game should be changing to become more like COTW. That is if the goal is to garner more market share ....

red rover
#

If other games become more like cotw then whats the point lol. Isnt the point of my suggestion to make cotw unique and different from other hunting sims?

sand raft
red rover
#

Well taking whatever way of the hunter has and apply it to cotw. That's if proves to be any different. For example. Map markers. Way of the hunter allows players to place multiple. Cotw you can only place just one.

sand raft
#

Again my response is why? Why should COTW change to be more like the other game when COTW has more players as is and the bigger market share

#

In fact I think you will see that as time goes on the other game will add things that COTW already has ....

red rover
#

Lol you're overthinking it. It should more like shit, why not. Whats wrong with more features and expansion of what can be done. Why be limited. Isnt the point of a feedback/suggestion channel to brainstorm and make a game better? Otherwise if it's not, why waste the time to even have this part of the discord up and running. Devs should just close out the public opinion of what they want possibly or game needs to be better than it could be. Right?

sand raft
#

OMG dude my point exactly we are in a forum literally fill with suggestions for things that the other game doesnt have and wont have for years if it's still around years from now. Stop trying to make COTW on Par with a game that has literally only been out for maybe 6 months and has fraction of the following .... I'm out ....

dull field
# red rover Lol you're overthinking it. It should more like shit, why not. Whats wrong with ...

Wouldn't waste the time bud. Guy is stuck and unable to grow. Completely misses the point and stuck in a re-iteration like a record player. Why i haven't bothered to reply. As well trying to figure out when the hell there was another game mentioned that we are comparing it to. This is about games in general... Pleb... And why? really? who the in the right mind would want the same game from release with nothing new to offer (IE. Updates, Story, Items, Content, Quality of Life, ETC "And if your smooth brain wants to talk money, the only thing they are offering here is cosmetics 101 for money hungry devs"). Gets boring really fast with just the base content. I hope no one listens to any of your financial advice...

red rover
#

@dull field made the poor bastard rage quit lmfao

sand raft
#

Not quitting just the brain dead ... enjoy your down votes ....

red rover
#

Lol 😂 those dont mean shit

#

Neither does upvotes. Glad you came back. Wasnt done having a conversation. Didnt say goodbye or excuse me.

normal quail
#

They do though. If the downvotes outnumber the upvotes it’s a general sign the community more against these suggestions than for them. Some of these can be pretty decent QoL additions, but some simply can’t be added due to game limitations + stuff like new species are always being added with each map release

red rover
#

I mean i could literally bring in people to just upvote and that will end that lol. Whos to say it hasnt been done already or could be 🤷‍♂️

shell pelican
#

Bipods would be hard to bring into the game as there's not really a way to balance them. Also, it's not that hard to aim. Get good

red rover
#

@shell pelican whats to balance? How would it be hard to add to the game, its literally in the first game lol. Just porting it over would be as easy as you keeping your mouth shut, because i dont remember asking you a god damn thing.

#

But please, continue lol LabBPat

shell pelican
red rover
#

Same goes for you dick cheese. Never asked for your opinion or two cents. Just left feedback and thats that. But your ass decided to use fighting words nerd so I was just giving some love right back. So if you're not ready for some comebacks you can eat a corn on the cobb lengthwise straight down your cake hole and go about your merry way. LabBPat

shell pelican
#

Is that supposed to be threatening...? Because it sounded like a first grader on the playground repeating something she heard on her favorite cartoon the night before

austere sun
#

I sense epic insult essay incoming

red rover
#

Only way I could be threatening is if i encountered you irl. Seeing as you're a keyboard warrior from the sound of it you wouldnt have the balls to open your mouth to anyone because you know it will get you wrecked

red rover
shell pelican
shell pelican
red rover
shell pelican
red rover
#

You an Englishman?

austere sun
shell pelican
red rover
austere crown
shell pelican
#

Ok?

austere sun
#

My ball sack is stapled to a 4x4
I’m cool like that 😎

red rover
#

Yeah i didnt type out "like my sick comeback".

red rover
austere crown
austere sun
red rover
#

Lol it certainly does not. Take English again. Community colleges have them real cheap. Usually run for about 15-20 weeks at a fair price.

austere sun
austere crown
red rover
#

Join my discord then

shell pelican
austere crown
austere sun
#

Lmfao

red rover
#

Yeah my bad forgot to add punctuations, citations, and sited sources

shell pelican
red rover
#

Lol some have from here. So you'd be surprised

#

Dont be shy baby cakes @shell pelican.

shell pelican
#

Only @austere sun can call me baby cakes

red rover
#

Yeah i bet lmao

austere sun
red rover
shell pelican
red rover
normal quail
red rover
normal quail
#

I mean, am I not allowed to partake in a discussion? Just because I got bad spending habits doesn’t mean I have power over anyone, i’m just as much a regular hunter as you.

shell pelican
#

I'll be honest, I fail to see how what I said was hostile

normal quail
#

I would also recommend having the mindset of assuming everyone is joking or being sarcastic when they shit like that. It’s your choice to get offended, and choosing not to is just a way to avoid hostility. Be the better guy y’know?

red rover
#

Yeah apparently being the cool chill dude from the beginning of the thread wasnt cutting it apparently. Like ive said before MF's on here dont like what some people say or suggest for this game and they lose their shit. The community is like closed minded to make the game expand and make it seem its impossible to add new mechanics, playstyles, and gear to the game. Once i tell it like it is usually people here get passive aggressive and shit. I could say, for example, i want something like boar traps and people lose their shit and throw realism shit in. Its inhumane, thats no fun and shit. Like okay cool, but if we want realism boars are pest and invasive in the US right? They destroy livelihoods and have the potential to spread disease among livestock. I said something similar to this before and the people bitching pretty much agreed. Traps for certain animals in game would be cool but some disagreed it would ruin the "skill" or "fun" of the hunt. I mean there is bait traps, feeding trough to lire animals near by and still have sport with the hunt. The game has calling lures, why not feeding ones? It was a solid suggestion. So sure you can come here from the woodwork, hop on the bandwagon and speak your mind. I got no quarrel with that. But dont be lecturing me on being thr better guy. That shit went out the window over a month ago. Ship sailed already Alice so you missed out. Real or in game hunter means nothing in this discussion. As for Jamer now cowering behind others for being called out on his BS. Speaks volumes of a man of lesser quality. I wanted to be cool but you MF chose hostility. You'll reap what you sow.

shell pelican
#

I ain't read allat

#

But fr tho, how am I cowering behind others? And when did I choose hostility?

arctic flower
#

Only one being hostile here is OP, downvote from me