#networking
1 messages Ā· Page 237 of 1
2
@thorny vector see, this is why Phoenix gets upset: https://i.imgur.com/DEAeRhu.png
what's the context of this lel
I thought phoenix left cause of the people in #development
he cant get his network device to work
Oh, with that dude having networking issues? Error 56, just some driver issues
@unborn sluice code 56 in windows device manager
@tame carbon oh lel, definitely because of cable
but people in general think its fixed in bios

like
its 9:45am
I am only on my first cup of coffee
aint got the nerves for this
But don't you know, all problems are fixed it the bios? /s
@thorny vector I don't see how resetting a bios is going to solve anything
I wouldn't expect it to. I dropped him a guide to follow, so š¤·āāļø
Honestly, my biggest pet peeve are the people that ask for people to build them a parts list with vague crap as guides
And it is. WITH POWERSHELL!
are you a hacker?
Hardly.
he's that guy that uses powershell in linux
it is, but he's the answer to
pretty sure commandlets in ps are just .NET programs
"Who tf uses this"
For a good reason, the PowerCLI powershell module is super powerful when controlling VMware products
@thorny vector fuuuuck
I hated that.
omfg
I had to make a custom ESX image for some raid controller
on windows 7
windows 7 PS does not have package manager by default
so took me about an hour to get PowerCLI to work
after which I could use esx customizer
garbage.
I have a script lying around somewhere that uses powershell 1.0 commands to pull and install the latest powershell version
Why? Those don't scale out well.
esxi and vsphere, on the other hand, are amazingly powerful
Not like I'm using workstation
you have to pay for workstation on linux
Unless you attend their conferences, where they gave out workstation 16 keys
or
use FOSS
and not give a crap about vmware
they put all kinds of arbitrary limits on their software
like 1 cpu socket max
... exactly
200 dollars a year for a VMUG dev liscense for all products
equivalent to the enterprise line
i'll pay 200 bucks a year for support and dev. Easy peasy.
I don't really do closed source software
Plus, its what is used in our forensic kits, and by almost every customer we have
and vmware putting all kinds of licensing on their kit, makes me look elsewhere
for single server vm hosting, QEMU/KVM is perfect
if you need scaling, Proxmox
Trust me, VMware liscensing is by far one of the milder buisness models we deal with
I like how microsoft forces a full Office-365 license on every employee
Not standalone kms solutions. Those are buy and be done. Just have to get new ones for any new products
isnt that the same as a subscription?
They drop support
and in a few years, they'll find a way to force their new software on older customers
No. Support is good for the life of the product
lol
they'll still support old office products
and even windows 7 still can be supported, if you buy the extended support
One of my friends was quite salty about this
they just paid over 15k for Microsoft Dynamics
and its already being phased out, 2 years after release
No, its moved to extended support
Irrelevant, its still planned obsolesence
so you can't build on it reliably
without being forced to pay microsoft
Its not planned obsolesence at all. Its natural progression of products. Planned obsolesence is if the products just stopped working after the end of support
and lemme tell you about some of the old products i get to deal with with some customers
This is just a fundamental problem with all closed source
it cares more about making a buck, than it cares about delivering a reliable software experience
Open source has its place, and its amazing. But closed source products often have much more reliable support.
@thorny vector say that to redhat
Really? I've had nothing but good expiriences with them
Good enough I went ahead and got my own subscription for home
Redhat shares all sourcecode with their customers
Their entire business model is built around support
Redhat/Centos/Fedora is a different story.
microsoft just writes a program, calls it "finished"
I think we're just at different ends of the user spectrum, and we're going to fundamentally disagree on a lot
puts it on a CD
and sells it for an insane markup
and drops support 2 years later
or release a new version for the same price, the next year
scratch that, lets make it a subscription
@thorny vector yeah, seems like it
I see the use in software, only in the problems it solves in our lives
this is why I dont understand why you would pay for an operating system
it doesn't solve a problem
you need it to run other programs
Yes, and I'll pay for it, because someone put work hours into making it
even the linux distros I use, I support the devs
pop_os, I bought a laptop
Redhat/centos, bought a subscription
mh. see thats good business
VMware, bought a liscense
I just wish if I bought something, I'd have full control over it
and not get "the right to use it"
@thorny vector open source & free market forces don't play well together
they fundamentally oppose eachother
They also operate in different market spaces
If it wasn't for FOSS, apple would not be where it is today
same goes for Microsoft
Apple makes heavy use of GNU utils
Ok. But I can call microsoft engineers, or vmware engineers. Its a lot harder for me to track down dev_guy_23 who helped make "x" distro/program.
but you can look at the source
same can't be said for microsoft
and if you have a problem
you can fix it yourself
or pay someone to fix it for you
So I can spend the time teaching myself enough to read through the source, and understand every product that I use on a daily basis. Or I can focus on my job, and have support do supports job
Yes, this is why companies like redhat exist
except they don't shaft you at every opportunity ;)
Like, my taxes go to this BS.
only because they got a chokehold on the govt.
I'd hardly say microsoft, vmware, and the half dozen other products I use are shafting me.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/dutch-government-pays-millions-to-extend-microsoft-xp-support/
@tame carbon Also, millions? Drop in the bucket to take care of critical, air-gapped systems
and then the next year
Sounds like a good deal to me
what is this bullshit?!
Again, that amount of money is barely anything at these scales
like, government operation, we should be in control of our own source.
and not pay some spying american company
A single one of our larger forensic kits cost more than what they're paying for support.
We're talking about an operating system here
and a government paying 10s of millions
to use an operating system.
its
rediculous.
Again, that's like you spending pennies
yeah but it doesnt solve the problem
in 2 years, we're still in the same boat
using windows xp
wasting money
š¤·āāļø
if we had our own source, we could employ our own experts
and if you give them 10 million, as we do with microsoft
All those systems, and the old software and hardware they have to use, aren't going anywhere.
they can solve it too.
Not because some evil company is holding them hostage, but because infrastructure and technologies made in ye olden times don't like talking to modern equipment
So the support is neccesary
https://www.zdnet.com/article/dutch-government-pays-millions-to-extend-microsoft-xp-support/
@tame carbon happiness noises
Support, that sounds an awful like redhat
@thorny vector but we can stop paying redhat at any time, and put our own smart people on it
because we have the sourcecode.
same cant be said for windows
Cool. But that requires paying people and training them up so they can do the support themselves. Which would end up costing more
Its like right to repair.
And you do have that right as a consumer (or at least you should. Looking at you, john deere). But things operate differently at the corperate/enterprise/government level
We do use open source stuff, but sometimes the most economical thing is to just get the plug and play solution
because we don't have time to train up all of our users to be power users
or the money
(or patience)
@thorny vector at a lot of companies, office computers can be linux these days
a lot of software uses webinterfaces
Can be. You have fun training those users/dealing with their complaints/etc.
honestly, if you have a good and well set up device
its more reliable
and a webbrowser is the same on all
like you said, people are not power users
they dont want to have to think about errors
I do want to say I do agree with what you said. But in practice, that's not how it works
And how stuff looks, and other utilities they're used to, how file explorer works for windows, etc
If people can figure out how to use a mac
or use their phone
I'm sure they will survive a different DE
Mac users arent windows users
cinnamon desktop is much like windows
I've seen plenty of non savvy users who do just fine on both
Hello
I have my ISP providing NATed ipv4
I wanted to do port forwarding
Is there any chance I can do that?
you mean CGNAT ip?
@rose sparrow if you are behind a NAT, you wont be able to port forward
Stupid n00b question, what do you guys use to test ISP speeds? I've been using the m-lab speed test that's a promoted google result
@peak cloak someone nuked my speedtests from last night
I think we need to amend the rule of not posting speedtests
if the techies get to post benchmarks, then let us have our speedtests
just show screenshots from cli https://discordapp.com/channels/375436620578684930/387022787480387605/776236202536992769
@spiral drift speedtest for public internet, iperf for validating throughput in network equipment
speedtest is bad tool for very high speed connections
that screenshot I posted last night, with the 2gbit/s internet
that connection is way faster than what speedtest claims
Is this LTE?
not really familair with it
but 500-700MHz looks like LTE to me
@thick minnow do you have an issues?
because to me, looks good
signal to noise ratio is above 30 throughout
@tame carbon itās wifi.... sometimes i canāt even load youtube or a website i have to restart the app just for it too load and when playing warzone i keep lagging of someone watches a 1440p or 4k youtube video. I have 1gig down and 50upload
@thick minnow use lan cables
wifi is crap
it can't really carry that much bandwidth consistently
one or two clients at same time on one AP you push up at the 800mbit/s limit
5GHz has more channels, and is more stable
But it does not penetrate walls
or, bad at least, stone it cant penetrate, drywall might work
especially consumer wifi routers
those are terrible
asus 
they should be ban those routers
@tame carbon itās a cable modem... my isp is cable so itās cable from the wall into the modem and then an ethernet to my orbi
thatās what i mean
yeah you aren't going to get 1gbit/s over wifi though
i know
i get 701
601*
over wifi... ethernet to my pc i have never gotten over 750
is the corrected and uncorrectables good like?
@thick minnow over gigabit lan you should get max speed
if its coaxial cable
its shared bandwidth
idk so much about that
Hi, I have an old Sitecom md 254 NAS. I'm having some problems with write speed. I'm only getting ~11MB/s. So you would say the NAS's running at a 100mbit. However, when I look in the "Connection Log" it says: eth0: link up, 1000Mbps, full-duplex, not using pause, Ipa 0xC1E1. I'm using a CAT6 cable and I tried 6 different cables. I'm not sure where the problem's at. I don't think it's in my PC, switch or router. Since I can access a shared hard drive on my laptop at 1000Mbps-103MB/s read and write (while using Ethernet). Every PC in my house has a max write speed of ~11MB/s on the NAS. The read speed is different. Sometimes it's 28MB/s and an hour later it's 14MB/s (same file).
I'm using Jumbo Frames and a MTU value of 4074 bytes. Changing this or disabling Jumbo Frames doesn't make a difference. If I look at the specs it says it has a gigabit rj45 connector and sata-300. Maybe the sata-300 link is the problem? It's certainly not the HDD's that are installed. When connecting them to my PC I'm getting 121MB/s read and 98MB/s write. The drives run in RAID1, but that doesn't impact the speed that much right?
I can't find anything in my router/NAS settings that limits the speed
maybe because u maxed out the NAS' ram cache?
try wait an hour later, then try again?
anyone has any experience with the eero 6 mesh wifi system
wow this is so coincidence
So iām supposed to be getting fiber internet... what kind of modem do i need? because idk if a cable modem is gonna work
if u know @ me
Do you know if your internet provider provides the modem? @thick minnow
Because I wouldn't think that they would just bring you the fiber and tell you to get it working yourself
It usually comes with the modem and they install it for you, sometimes even the router is integrated in the modem they provide
I have no clue if they do, last week they brought a cable modem so i donāt see how fiber is supposed to work with it @open forge
What is your provider?
EQUIP, TAXES & FEES: Free standard installation with online orders, visit suddenlink.com/installation for details. Modem-lease will be charged $10.00 a month. Free Smart Router available with leased modem. Limit 1 router per household. A $3.50 Network Enhancement Fee applies. Surcharges, taxes, plus certain add'l charges and fees will be added to bill, and are subject to change during and after promotion period. Min system req's & equip configs apply.
So you can lease their router + modem for 10$/month and not bother with it
yeah but i want to use my own, last time i used their i couldnāt be use the internet
what iām trying to say is do i need a new modem if iām getting fiber because i have a cable modem right now
Yes since your modem is probably to get a coax signal to an ethernet signal
do u know what modem would be best for fiber-optic speeds?
You just need a Gigabit Media Converter
ex
Then you have to configure your router to instruct it how to connect to their network
bruh
You will need a username and password that is different from your account that you use to connect to their website
what about a FTTP?
That's what I assumed you were going to receive
iāll just wait until a technician comes and see what they will do i guess
thanks you for your time
i need help with 1 more thing @open forge
With fiber it will be an ONT instead of a modem. If you want to purchase one instead of rent I would ask the ISP a head of time a list of approved ONTs. The techs typically do not know which ones are compatible
ah.... so the would the ONT go to my orbi or what? @hollow marlin
Yes. An ONT is the same concept as a modem. If you purchase your own you will need to configure it and just plug your router in
Verizon for example doesn't allow users to buy their own ONT's as it's a GPON network so it needs to do their own thing
So i would probably just use my own isp ONT if thatās what they do....
Also ever since i had a technician come to my house my wifi has been acting up and i look at the modem they messed with me thereās a lot of corrected and uncorrected things
anyone know how to fix from there being 1 thousand to over 100k
This means there is a physical issue on the incoming COAX. Either a bad splitter, bad/broken cable, bad booster, etc... Basically this is what your ISP would handle on fixing.
Not necessarily. Also -db power levels are normal, it tells you the signal strength which over distance will degrade.
alrighty, thank you
Any ideas why I can't seem to ping but can resolve DNS requests in a x86-to-aarch64 chroot (facilitated by /usr/bin/qemu-aarch64-static)?
@tame carbon @peak cloak New APs came today, hEX S won't come for a couple more days
nice
@waxen scroll they finally gave me remote access so I can work from home in case another shutdown wave comes in
I need some advice here with my networking plan.
Iām really trying to get my pricing under $600, so I need to find out how to knock off $184 somehow.
I have gig speed internet and need to deliver it to devices, and Iām really trying to get a rackmount router for my future rack.
I looked into TP-link business APās that would suit my needs, but for roaming and āmeshā functionally you seem to need an $80 controller which would void any cost savings from using it over the MicroTik APās.
Honestly at this point I donāt care who this hardware is from, router and AP can be entirely different brands as long as I can get it in my budget.
MOCA adapters are for two of the APs, since my house was built in 1980 and is not wired with Ethernet except for a cable running to my downstairs switch.
from what i can say, tp link makes quality products
i got a pcie network adapter from them and it works great
I agree, but thereās no cost savings with it.
If thereās no savings with it then I would just feel better off using APās already integrated into routerOS
Less points of failure and complexity
iām not very knowledgeable about this stuff so i would check with someone else tbh
Alright, thanks
Itās more just finding equivalents to bring down the price rather than technical assistance
Will wait for someone who knows more.
@tribal ferry If you want cheaper decent APs with WiFi 5/ac, you could go with these for $50 each: https://www.google.com/shopping/product/705792687920812625?q=rt-ac66u&safe=active&hl=en&tbs=vw:l,ss:44&sxsrf=ALeKk03PcGvY3SdAy0XUUBHYW6_XPbdoDQ:1605245390767&psb=1&prds=eto:9957042279323755990_0,cdl:1,prmr:1,cs:1
ASUS RT-AC1200 V2
One of the main issues is that I need multiple of these.
Roaming/mesh/whatever they call it
Iām not sure if those would support it
They might not. I think you might have your best deal then @70 per AP.
The only way to bring down my pricing is with getting a cheaper router then.
Only downside I experience with non-mesh for 3 APs is sometimes my mobile devices dont drop weaker connections sooner.
Iām stuck between a rock and a hard place with me having to get the MOCA adapters.
Yeah, thatās why I need ones that specifically support it.
If you are talking about client roaming from AP to AP - I'm quite sure mikrotik doesn't have that.
I believe they do after hearing it from a couple members yesterday
However, a different ASUS router of mine does allow for setting reception threshholds for forcing a connected device to drop & try elsewhere. I forget the feature name.
Fast roaming?
If my house was wired with Ethernet even slightly more than now Iād be a-ok with pricing.
They have CAPsMAN to manage multiple AP. And have something like zero provisioning for them, not actual mobility
The adapters are what cripple my budget.
Yes, all the traffic would be routed to the main router with CAPsMAN
My ASUS RT-AC66U calls it "Roaming Assistant"
Yeah, I know each brand calls it different
Helpful with cutting off weak 5GHz connections so they'll go to 2GHz or a different AP
Mesh is not a unanimous term between all brands, they mean different things wherever you go
cAP lite doesnāt seem good either, itās not powerful enough for me
@tribal ferry get cAP ac
those aren't limited to 100M
@stuck hawk kicking off a client because of signal strength is really annoying.
Some clients refuse to swap APs, and will try to reconnect
giving you the classic meme
if you want true roaming capabilities, you'll have to get an AP that is compliant with 802.11ak/r
sadly mikrotik is not
CAPsMAN makes life easier, I don't trust ASUS one bit.
Yeah
I don't bother with complicated wireless setups
I just plug cable into laptop :3
@unborn sluice I got a long laptop charging cable under my desk, with a lan cable velcro'd to it
both ports are next to eachother :)
on rails lol
exactly
Its still annoying when 4 pcs are on one switch but in software they all have same IP
Fucking hate non configurable switches
@dusky wigeon Thats HUB i guess?
Its still annoying when 4 pcs are on one switch but in software they all have same IP
@dusky wigeon But they have different Internal Ip
@dusky wigeon they shouldnt have the same IP.
switches dont care about IP
switches talk ethernet, not IP
Dont we distribute Internal IPs on switches?
no
switches switch ethernet frames
layer 2 uses only two mechanisms, LLC and MAC
IP is layer 3
Then its the router which distributing the IPs ?
technically crystal is right, but basically if your idea is dhcp server -> switch -> pc then yes
But dont we connect like this
HOST/PC -> Switch -> Router -> Network(WAN)
just a a diagram of the connections from PC to the WAN
well, crystal is right
Yeah, its right
but i mean myself are confused IPs/DHCP distribute are happened on Switch or Router
why would a router distribute IP
I think it's john
the DHCP server does the DHCP stuff
Yeah who is running the DHCP server
the engineers
or both of them can
it's the DHCP server
So single layer switch is just a extension cord
@nova igloo there's a reason we call these things "protocol stacks"
there's various protocols stacked ontop of eachother
ethernet makes sure we can transfer data between two devices
it takes care of what we call a 'LAN'
when a device connects to a LAN, it sends out a DHCP broadcast
client announces itself with discovery broadcast
the server then offers an IP it could use
the client then requests an IP it'd like, either using the one it had previously, or using the one offered by the server
the server acknowledges the request, and the client sets its IP
@nova igloo to make sure the right ethernet frame goes to the right computer, MAC is used
Media Access Controll
switches have a table internally, and they know which MAC is connected on which port
so when an ethernet frame comes in, it just looks at the destination MAC
and forwards the frame
@nova igloo that image you sent is wrong in so many ways xD
NAT has nothing to do with address allocation
Learning so much just by reading 
This is what the DHCP client that talks to my ISP
And locally, you have your own DHCP server
you can see the pool of addresses on the left
you can have multiple pools
I got like 3 dhcp servers running on my router
or just ditch this entirely
and use ipv6
you don't need NAT and DHCP
Maybe different ISP using different topology???
wdym
star topology ^
@unborn sluice original ethernet was bus topology xD
only one device could talk at any one time
and they use CSMA/CD to make sure collisions are avoided
I mean who doesn't want getting spammed by packets to drop
Carrier-sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) is a media access control (MAC) method used most notably in early Ethernet technology for local area networking. It uses carrier-sensing to defer transmissions until no other stations are transmitting. This is us...
CSMA/CD isnt really a thing in networks anymore
I wonder if the next generation would hear about how HUBs work
because we have full duplex gigabit on switches

because we have full duplex gigabit on switches
thank you smart people for bringing the cost down

even the cheapest one in the online shopping is switch
pretty sure the new ones are updated
if I update to the new routerOS
40G should also be listed now
what the flying fuck
scalps?
here, chinese is synonym for 'cheap garbage'
the kind of stuff you can buy on ali
really is cheap garbage
@unborn sluice I'm surprised LTT got the aliexpress PC to boot lol
nah it was a while back
lel I don't know sht about these titles
Get 50% off your first 3 months of FreshBooks when you sign up for a paid plan at https://www.freshbooks.com/techtips
Use code LINUS and get 25% off GlassWire at https://lmg.gg/glasswire
We constantly make videos of weird stuff we find on AliExpress, but we've never built a ...
i just want to watch building pcs
welp, i'm off to youtube to watch that
hap ac3 still not in newegg

@unborn sluice if ur not watching
Get 50% off your first 3 months of FreshBooks when you sign up for a paid plan at https://www.freshbooks.com/techtips
Use code LINUS and get 25% off GlassWire at https://lmg.gg/glasswire
We constantly make videos of weird stuff we find on AliExpress, but we've never built a ...
at least watch the B-roll
I timestamped it for ya
I'm literally watching
the whole thing
oh wait hapac3 only has 1PoE

@tame carbon a store in my store in my country is on the fucking sea
maybe I should swim to buy hap ac3
@tame carbon Already planning to.
That's what I have in my plan, I was just seeing if there is anything cheaper.
@tribal ferry not for dual band APs
What should I get then?
You're looking for just wireless APs right?
Really depends on what spec you need
just 2.4GHz is relatively cheap
but dualband (with 5GHz) gets expensive quickly
mostly because those APs have gigabit ethernet instead of fast
Yep, I do need dual band.
And then I have the MOCA adapters, which puts me over budget by $184
Yep, it is.
that stuff is so expensive lol
why not wire it up then/
If I won the lottery then maybe, lol
Oh, rented ?
It's not a single story home, either. Two story including a basement.
And a finished attic
And a half finished basement.
You guys renovating?
This is the prime time to toss some network cables in the wall
The largest we're going to do is this kitchen, there's no major structural changes.
Upstairs in the bedrooms, it's just going to be wallpaper removal, plastering holes, and paint.
Idk what those tools are called in english
but if you're doing plaster
you can cut grooves into the wall
run the cable through it, and then cover it with plaster
It's just patching holes - not replastering
if you are doing drywall and painting that is the time to do cabling
Thats what I did
Painting is all we're doing upstairs.
do cables, then plaster, then paint
you just need a couple of holes

I can probably run a cable to my study if I put a switch in the top of my basement.
Called a "Wall chaser"
it cuts a groove into the wall
you can run cables through them, and then cover them up
unless you are a dennis
and you don't use powertools
I just fished cables
@tribal ferry those cAPs also support PoE, so you only need a networking cable to the AP location
you will probobly save yourself some frustration doing it the way crystal said
I mean, possibly.
it looks harder than it really is
It might just be easier to pay extra with the MOCA
if it works that is
@tribal ferry or
you find the duct that the coaxial uses
pull it out, and run ethernet instead
I didnt want to deal with running 5+ cables from my network cabinet to the other side of the building
so I run a single fiber
and split onto copper on the other side
Yeah, I've thought about doing it before but fiber seems entirely overkill for me.
I only have 1gbps speed from Xfinity.
@tribal ferry fiber is actually not that overkill lol
its futureproof
$18 per transceiver (you need two) and $5 for a fiber
true
I got one for free, but I only have one
and no fiber cable
and no real use
for now
@peak cloak we got the TV & wifi AP in the living room, and there's 0 cables visible :)
TV is in an enclosure, and when you press button to turn it on
it moves up, james bond villain style
Crystal, do you have a multi-AP setup?
AP in the stairwell (center of house), TV uses roku, no cables visible either
that's fancy
@tribal ferry not currently, but I plan on doing so
we don't really watch much tv
@tribal ferry I do manage my AP with CAPs
I have an RB4011 as core router
and hAP ac2
for home wifi
I chose the hAP because it has 5x gigabit, and I needed to hook up the TV settop, and smart TV
it also sends out wifi
@tribal ferry https://i.imgur.com/km3o10v.png
hAP ac2 ^
Ah ok
I was thinking about putting an mAP in my bedroom
since signal is kinda bad, 2 walls inbetween
These are incredibly cheap
Seems to be only 2.4 ghz
100M max yes
I only use wifi for my phone
@tribal ferry all mikrotik APs can be used as CAPs
I got like 4 mikrotiks :)
I think with my current setup, it's the cheapest I can do
Microtik is already low-priced enough.
unless if I want to run those ethernet cables
@tribal ferry I have my doubts on the reliability of MOCA
Its not really something a consumer deploys
Three*
And this is assuming, it works without a hitch.
More, if my home has the correct coax wiring.
Just saying
I think MOCA is a dirty solution to your problem
if you are renovating, maybe just run some ethernet
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
Mounting it on the ceiling?
The attic is finished.
yeah but the space inbetween?
most ceiling constructs are wood
@peak cloak utility company is here again. lol, I will flip my shit if they shut down power again
Well, I can look into it.
There's this week half part in my attic that's not finished
@tribal ferry do you have a contractor that does the renovating?
Just plaster on the walls, no paint.
We're still planning the kitchen.
This is not a huge renovation - there's no specified contractor for our house.
So its DIY home improvement
We do everything ourselves except for this kitchen.
mhm
Essentially, yeah.
yeah kitchen you get a pro for
but painting walls you can do yourself
@tribal ferry if you don't want to cut into walls..
you can get those really small cable ducts
and run them along the edge of the wall near the ceiling
I've done my own electrical xD
I don't trust myself to do it
@peak cloak how hard can it be
In theory I know how
RCD & fuses are a thing for a reason
idk, I've soldered about in DMX lighting dimmers before
I don't think we have whole home RCD here
I don't trust myself to do it
@peak cloak my most shocking experience
was 50kV from a photocopier
I woke up on the other side of the room
I don't really remember what happened
but supposedly I shocked myself unconciouss
Ok guys, i'm looking for a cheap solution to the following : Student housing, 7 rooms, 1 internet connection, every room has a RJ45 connection in the wall, and there's Wifi with client isolation. However i'm looking for a way to isolate all wired network connections.
I know of Vlans etc. Requires managed switch and it has to stay cheap. I wanted to get the cheapest routers and place 1 per room.
@tribal ferry was fixing a feeder on a big laser printer
and poked my screwdriver in the wrong place
the actual roller that charges the laser printer runs at like 50kV
I'm lucky I survived
@stable warren VLAN with ingress protection
I can try running cables in the unfinished part of my basement.
@stable warren on my mikrotiks I can map trunk ports to access ports
So the device connected to the switch, thinks its a regular LAN
the switch tags the traffic with a VLAN number
and on your router, you can then assign each port as a VLAN interface
and set up firewall rules
hmm so it would be possible with 1 switch
got modem (ISP) -> managed switch
@stable warren you need a router
@stable warren ^ this is a single trunk line to my switch
the modem=router
and every device on the switch has its own vlan
@stable warren yeh you'll need a new router
ISP router doesn't have VLANS, I would be very surprised if it does
your ISPs modem/router/wifi/whatever is not going to be able to do this
@stable warren https://i.mt.lv/cdn/rb_images/1633_l.jpg
This is a router
the port on the very left (that hole) is a highspeed connection, for say.. a switch
router != wifi
psshh
yeah i'm not unfamiliar with routers/switchs/managed switch or L2/L3. But never looked at this part of it
@stable warren what you want, can be done
but not with consumer gear
mikrotik is affordable, and can do all of this
but it requires a bit of know-how to configure
got a Ubiquiti edgerouter here should be able to do it
which one?
That one can do VLANs
3 i believe
so you'll need a managed switch
also got those
oh yeah, with the ER-X I would worried about performance
just put them all in one router, then all of them have distinct subrouters, so double NATs for everyone

@stable warren set the switch up, configure vlan tagging per port
each port is for 1 room
then, use a single port as a trunk, that goes to your router
Set up the vlan config on those
yeah, need to make a test setup
@stable warren I'm not at all familair with VLAN interfaces on unify
me neither :P
i'm guessing everything has to be bought,
@stable warren this registers a virtual interface on the router, with vlan ID 501
yeah Ubiquiti has some weird non standard stuff sometimes
@stable warren if you set the access port on the switch, to tag traffic with 501
it will appear on the virtual interface on the router
Any advice on hardware to get?
250/50
@stable warren any budget?
@stable warren for edgemax, you would setup a vif under the interface you want to use (eth4 for my example)
@stable warren I have a 250/250 connection at home
And I use the RB4011
I have two customers of mine, that get their internet from me
example of config under the vif
@stable warren those customers get internet from me, through VLANs, identical to what you described you wanted
You could use the edge router to do this
i c sounds good
But that RB4011 I posted, its about 180 euros
well the edgerouter is mine :P
and its capable of 10gbit/s total speed
It has 10x 1gbit (grouped into two groups of 2.5G each)
and a single 10G interface
it's just for student housing, problem now is that some idiot ruins the network somehow
need to go there this weekend to figure out why/who/what
Mikrotik is deffo the way to go for DIY
looks nice
@stable warren https://mikrotik.com/product/RB2011iL-IN
yeah looking at it now, it has routeros?
think i tried that on my vmware server
@stable warren when buying a mtik, make sure you look at the test results
That RB2011 is the smaller brother of the RB4011
Its low cost
Not as fast
but its still fast enough for your purposes
looks fine by me, i got 500/50 at home myself but no advanced setup really, just 1 modem+router -> 5 switches
@stable warren I assume, each user in their room, will have their own router?
@stable warren you could set up DHCP pools for each VLAN
and allow users to hook up a switch
to their 1 port
thought about that
all of that is quite easy on mtik
i can get some cheapo crap switch for ~25 euro's a piece, and just put those between the switch/wall connector
switch = router
@stable warren yeah each room can have their own unmanaged switch
DHCP is all done by the mtik router
yeah with the mtik solution
Traffic seperated by VLANs & firewall on the router
A couple of days from now a student asks why he can't port forward 
@stable warren well, with the RB4011
you could do it all in one device
it has 10 ports
more than enough
@stable warren oh yeah that is one issue. Port forwarding will not be an option.
Because you still share the same public IP
now the modem/router has 4 ports, 1 goes to switch, and 7 wires
for each room 1
and on the modem itself it has 2 AP's fed with POE injectors
they got client isolation on
I'm still betting on this one
that's an all in 1 solution
You can in theory get 20x gigabit out of it
that 10Gbit port can be hooked up to a switch
if you need more ports
well there's a option to put the modem in 'bridge mode'
I would not do this on the modem
but gotta go through ISP and it can take 1 to 5 days :P
@stable warren do you know what kind of plans the ISP offers?
I got a /29 range from my ISP
so each device has its own public IP
nope not possible
rip
they even do that 'public NAT' thing, where the exit IP is the same for several customers
not sure what it's called
CGNAT
aka; the bane of ipv4
does your ISP have ipv6?
I love CGNAT
yeah can't forward with that
I can't port forward
It does, however not everywhere :P
IPV6 that is
Also this depends on the modems used
in theory if you want to be able to offer port fowarding
you can set up a 6to4 tunnel
and set up dual stack
every client gets a NATed v4, and a public v6
doesn't tunnelbroker tunnel not work under cgnat?
fuck. you're right.
i don't think ISP allows for multiple external IP's on the consumer versions
and business = expensive BS
believe you pay per IP
ipv6 is multiple ip's anyway, could you ask them for ipv6?
hehe
getting distracted
the smallest routable ipv6 is a /64
can't ask them for anything
they allow for port forwarding on the modem, but disabled custom DNS with a update a while back
@stable warren besides recommending the RB4011, not really sure what else you'd need
think that does what i need it to do
this solution expects all cables from the various rooms to terminate in one location
if you don't have that, you'll need a managed switch.
159 euro's for that MikroTik RB4011iGS+RM
oh wow
Thats better than what I paid for it
I paid like 180 euros
@stable warren that router is futureproof too
any chance there's 1 with 16 ports/POE+ :P
my GS110T is POE+ and managed :P
it's got 6 AP's on it, 3 x Ubiquiti AC something and 3 x Ruckus R510
And some IP cams
stupidly enough
mtik doesnt sell any PoE switches that arent outdoor
This is ment as an outdoor solution
pff
just need gbit lol
@stable warren no the 10G is for the trunk to the router
access ports are 1G
But this is a managed switch (runs routerOS)
and has 16x PoE
Its $279
There are probably better solutions for PoE
I just know that they are very expensive
all i can find with some ports : https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/rv345p-dual-gigabit-wan-poe-vpn-router/index.html
oh no cisco
F cisco
lol
might as well give the NSA your root password
seems to be the only all in 1 solution, not sure about vlan though
@stable warren don't you already use injectors?
yeah but i'm looking for a solution for home also :)
oh
Well that netpower_16p I linked, is ment as a junction box for public wifi
highspeed switching & PoE
that one looks expensive :P
All PoE switches are expensive
actually looks like it does what i need, 32vlans
NSA can have a look if they want :P
I'm not certified to help with cisco
lol
that shit requires like IQ 9000

2 normal gbit switches, 1 4poe/4normal, 1 full POE-managed, 1 managed
that looks kinda childish? :P
lol
haha
and a $3000 pricetag
block diagram is nuts
each SFP+ cage is capable of 10gbit/s
great for home solutions :P
more like a small ISP
you can serve a small town with this
and give everyone gigabit speeds
with all the 'ISP rules' and stuff here that wouldn't work
If you run that kind of gear, you just sign up with an ASN directly
and do your own peering
you become the ISP
it's more about the data that has to be stored
I don't log my internet, I made the two customers sign over liability on those IP addresses
so if I ever get police knocking on my door, I just forward their request
already got those
yeah
like ubiquiti/cloudtrax/ruckus
great fun and all until they make you pay per device
Cloudtrax used to be free when it came to management portal. AP's ranged from 150-300 euro's
damn
I got : 3 x https://www.ui.com/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-lite/ and 3 x https://www.commscope.com/product-type/enterprise-networking/wireless-access-points/indoor/r510/
how much are those unify ac lites?
no clue
cus those are on par with the cAP ac I just linked
and running the Unifi controller here also, looks great and all
around 76 euro's a piece for the AC lite
a 5pack = 347 euro's
@stable warren all the mikrotik devices running RouterOS L4 and up can be a CAPsMAN server
thats the 'controller' in essence
I liked cloudtrax, all cloud no onsite bs








