#networking
1 messages · Page 193 of 1
I like how freenas doesn't care that you swap the mobo/cpu/sata etc underneath it. still works
I'm looking at FreeNAS now, how automated are the plugin installs on there? It has Emby Media server which I've been trying to snag a cheap PC on eBay to install on and that Zoneminder which would remedy these shit programs I'm using right now.
what ever plugins are in the ecosystem are quite easy to install
I run a few transmission clients
Their plugins are alright
lol after upgrading from a avoton c2550 to an e3-1220 freenas ui feels so much snappier
not sure what to do with my old board yet. maybe swap over one of my rpi to it
Sorry, quick question, I'm running a NetComm NF18ACV-TP and it doesn't want to let go of ports 80, 8080, and 437 (it won't let me forward them to my Apache box because it uses them for its admin login) is that common? Is there a way I can replace the software running it to something less bossy?
@willow storm that's fairly common for consumer hardware. Replacing the software depends on if someone has written the firmware for it, and how locked the device itself is
@willow storm if someone has made firmware for it, check dd-wrt for it
cheers 😄
I'm confident that I'm the right combination of foolhardy and rtfm-capable to get this right, especially given we're at the point of just buying a different router.
On that point, I have permission from my ISP to host a site from home, any suggestions on decent fibre-to-the-premisis modem-routers that will allow that level of configuration? or should I just get a modem and set up one of my nix boxes to route?
What do you mean with "that level of configuration"? Hosting a website only requires the modem/router to allow you to set up port-forwarding, nothing else, unless you want to host a website on the router/modem itself
no, that's exactly what I meant. I took port forwarding of all ports for granted until this piece of junk proved me wrong
Now I feel kinda burnt
I understand your reaction though
I really did think it was standard
Your box has ports 80, 8080 and 437 exposed on WAN-side?
I mean, it's irrelevant if they're open on LAN-side
It's the WAN-side that matters
no, everything's behind the router, I can't expose those ports wan-side because the software on the router won't let me set up the forwarding tables to include those ports
Wow, what a piece of shite, really
it won't let me direct them to other ports either
That definitely shouldn't work like that
I know, right?
Never heard of a modem/router that does things like that
Aight. I meant no offense
I have encountered all sorts of terrible networking-gear in my life, but this is the first case where I hear of a situation like yours! That said, I have no recommendations to give, unfortunately.
Can the box be configured as a bare bridge? That way you could always use a separate router
yeah that was on the to-do list
I've got enough *nix boxes on this side of it to spare one as a router
Does your ISP allow you to use your own modem?
yeah, we're on speaking terms with the owner, he was the one who recommended that modem weirdly enough
because it is blindingly fast and reliable
which is sad, it is otherwise a fantastic bit of kit
so the bridge idea does appeal
No point in wasting money on another modem, if that one can be configured as a bridge, IMHO
yeah, I'm going to look into whether it can be hooked up that way,
Fair. The only reason I would prefer not having my that extra hop would be to reduce potential troubleshooting spots in the future, and so my edge router would be the one touching the wan
@vast juniper also, is your profile picture a kiwi with a Thompson?
Lol, I love it
That's brilliant
It's also wearing a red Rambo-bandana
Of course, why wouldn't it?
Hm, there's a bug with the moderation-bot. I just tried to explain the story behind the icon and it triggered a warning and censored me
Yeah, it's pretty sensative
I occasionally set it off with too many capital letters, or repeated characters
I didn't even say the word it claims I did, so it's not just sensitive, but triggers on non-existing things
Welp, that definitely puts a damper on my interest in staying here. The fear of random censorship will make me constantly second-guess anything I wish to say
It's not really that bad
I'm using two different internet connection (with different isp's) for streaming. I'm using two pc streaming setup and one of my isp has a great upload speed, while other one has a great download speed and lower ping. So normally I connect the internet with the great upload speed to my streaming pc and the other one to my gaming pc. Recently I started to use a program called voicemeeter, it offer voice sharing via lan network so I can use the same mic/headset for my both pc's. I bought a usb to ethernet cable so now I'm able to connect two different internet to the one pc. The problem is I want to use one internet for general internet access and the other one just for lan sharing. Is there any way for me to achieve this?
anyone use cloudflare's free argo tunnel?
@scenic rose You can set interface preference in network settings
looks like the argo free tunnel has bandwidth limits. guess I can try to set up the same kind of tunnel on a VPS. anyone have any software suggestions
nevermind I settled on using nextcloud with ipv6 and cloudflare. I can just shut down the service when no one wants anything off it
Any UniFi gurus here? I’m looking for some assistance with setting up two WAN DHCP addresses on one physical port on the UniFi Security Gateway 3P, but I’m not sure on how to set this up with the gateway json file. Anyone with some spare time and who’re knowledgeable in this field?
Thanks in advance!
@bold relic kinda wish ubnt could expose more than one ip address in the GUI tools. It seems like an oversight
Tell me about it 😛
I’ve tried to google my issue for a good hour or two but I’m not making any good progress ...
I’ve found some guides, but nothing that helps me with my DHCP issue
Here’s the deal, to somewhat further explain:
My ISP offers their customers 5 dynamic WAN IPs per customer, but since I’ve just plugged their single port in my apartment to my USG’s WAN port, I’m really only able to use one of them.
I figured I could setup another interface on that same WAN port that requests another DHCP IP and my WAN side would now be reachable by two different IPs, and I could offer different resources on the LAN side depending on what IP the request is coming from.
From what I understand the setup is possible, but not with the UI as mentioned, but with a certain configuration in a 'config.gateway.json’ file.
I’m consequently looking for assistance with this file to get that functionality.
I realize this offers no performance increase ...
And I don’t want a switch between the wall and the gateway, which I realize would also be a (more expensive and cumbersome) solution.
a switch is probably way more straight forward though LOL
Yeah, but I’d need to configure a separate port on the USG to act as a WAN2 port and/or VLAN the internal network and it just gets more cumbersome to maintain.
@bold relic sorry I wish I could help. But I also read that even ubnt support team will not assist with any of this
It's only a ubnt forums community support thing
@bold relic yeah I think you are out of luck with the USG
my only idea is to ask on Ubiquiti forums or Discord
hey had a network question
so if for example your getting 500 mbs according to provider but only get for example 50 why could that be?
is it mbps or mb/s for both?
500Mbps (ex. Speedtest and ISP ad) would be around 62.5MB/s (ex. Steam downloads)
500MB/s would be 4000Mbps...aka 4Gbps....holy shit then lol
lol
there's usually at least two reasons you're not getting full speed from an ISP assuming accurate readings. your area is too busy and there's not enough capacity, or the server you're accessing can't push it out
what does a speed test show? try further away locations to see how it changes
try avoiding Speedtest servers ran by your ISP
500MB/s would be 4000Mbps...aka 4Gbps....holy shit then lol
@rocky badge good point. I wasn't thinking of real life possible speeds. Just wanting to see if it was the same measurements
Yeah
make sure they dont mean bytes probally does say bits
what if they say Mbps though
Then that's megabits
same thing right megabits
Yeah, Gbps, Mbps, Kbps
yea and your saying 100 megabits equals too about 10 megabytes
so 1k megabits or 1 is 100 megabytes
👌 np
do you think better modems/routers help or not really?
I mean it could help but it could not either
yea was just asking and curious but really appreciate the insight
Is there some way to use PFSense to figure out how my phone is accessing the SD card on that WiFi camere I was talking about yesterday?
make a firewall rule with logging enabled for all routed connections from phone to wifi camera
then check the firewall logs for ports and if it used tcp or udp
Hmmm, so From Source camera, to destination Phone? Flipped it either way, not seeing it log anything yet I'm scrolling around recorded videos and days....
I set it to any protocol, any direction.
100mbit router?
take away 1 "0" at the end of 100 lol
Posted this in the tech chat earlier but no answer, so im posting it here where i know there are people who can help.
Are these disk speeds considered ok or slow for a vm in ESXI? The virtual machines always feel slow when doing anything involving writing data. I know it wont be anywhere near as fast as a desktop running ssds
if this is better suited for a different channel, please tell me and i will move it
Little issue I'm running into here.
I've been getting subpar internet speeds on my wired internet. 90mbps usually and I pay for 1gpbs.
Before I go through all of the issues of checking if wires are cat 5e, I wanted to check my computer's network adapter.
I have this adapter:
It says it's gigabit speeds, but after checking this thread: https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/only-getting-100mbps-with-gigabit-service.2638944/
it says to check the "speed and duplex" in the advanced section in device manager.
Speed and duplex says this:
Only 10 or 100mbps.
Now I'm confused - is my network adapter rated for 1gbps?
mine only goes to 100 too
yep. typically 1000 only operates in auto mode. not every system can be configured for always 1000
@cedar igloo @waxen scroll Well, what should I do then?
I don't mean to give you a massive thread but,
Let me give the rundown quick of the issue I’m facing. I’ve always not had the greatest network speeds with my computer. I pay for 1gbps down from Xfinity, they are my ISP. Issue is, I would usually only max out at about ~125mbps. To be fair, that is a very good speed and I’m ...
@tribal ferry do you have access to a really long cat 5e or better cable and try plugging your computer directly to router?
That should rule out if it's the cable or the router or something else
make sure they dont mean bytes probally does say bits
@kind sky network speeds are basically always in bits/s
ddr3 ram is so expensive
@nocturne harness Yea I appreciate it I mean a lot of the time I thought they were automatically in bytes you know you see the big number for a typical user they think its amazing when its not bad but yea
lol I was looking to buy some. been looking on amazon and ebay @little schooner
@vapid dune what prices have you seen so far
for 4x8GB probably ~160 CAD which might need shipping
that's more than I spent on the motherboard + cpu lol
network speed is in bits because that's what the hardware transmits
there's no concept of bytes in networking
packets are in bytes
you get nicer numbers if you use bytes ;p
network gear is sometimes rated in PPS
like my ERL advertises 1Mpps
Yeah that's true
@vapid dune oh I only ship in usa
But yeah 160 cad expensive for old ram
ah yeah, that's why I'm shopping around. ebay tends to kill me on shipping a bit lol
it's at least 20-30 to ship it by my estimate
trying to avoid mystery ram from china
packets /are/ network layer
Ahh
everything below the network later has no concept of packets
yeah frames and physical
the determining factor in networks is the transport and physical, the latter just being some binary (bit) representation of whatever it's transporting
the whole PPS thing is just the processing speed of the routing hardware
if you look at the RFCs for stuff like ethernet frames you'll see they are specified as a certain number of octets
Is there like a website that makes a general summary of the long rfc documents?
and then when it goes to the physical layer it gets converted into 8b/10b encoding (for example)
Not saying they are bad as they are but for other people to get the idea fast
oh hmmm
wikipedia? lol
(8b/10b encoding is 8 bit words repesenting 10 bit symbols)
Hence why we don't use bytes in network, it starts getting odd
because for gigabit ethernet for example, we transmit 125 MBd/lane, there are 4 lanes in each direction, so we get 500 MBd/second per direction
I think I got a mosquito byte
Does anybody here use OpenWRT?
@little schooner curious what kind of ram are you selling? non-ecc?
It's G.skill F3-1600C9D-16GXM sticks
So they are 8GB each
G.SKILL F3-1600C9D-16GXM Ripjaws X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007CCV1TI/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_i_pR-0EbGDVW88A
That
oh lol 160 cad is ~120 usd
Is there a way to increase upload speed without getting a better plan?
no no for 4 sticks of 8gb
Oh
Yeah I just try to see what they go for on ebay
@vapid dune shipping to Australia for example was like 20 bucks for a Volta cable
I think Canada should be cheaper
I'd rather have the customs forms already pre-made within the label I buy
I don't like filling it out at the office especially now
ah yeah
Is there a way to increase upload speed without getting a better plan?
@last crest not really
if you're getting slow speeds because of your local network, then I guess maybe?
but if you're getting the full speed of your plan then no
Ok
Anyone order any ubiquiti gear recently? curious what the turn-around has been
with the supply chain being hurt by the covid
direct or other?
I'm not sure where my supplier orders from -- i'd assume direct
its a purchase covered by eRate so I can't place it until July 1 😦 Hoping the supply chain has been replenished by then so I can get the gear installed without people in the building.
ok cool. I'm phasing out some 5406 switches. Ordering 12 of the gen2 48 ports on july 1.
@burnt oasis it's been decent, depends on where you live and where you ship to
@burnt oasis what's reasoning behind replacing Aruba with Ubi?
this is pre-aruba HP gear. Main reason is because all of our AP's and cameras are ubiquiti. I'm not really replacing per say -- i'm just shifting the load. Back in the olden-days they ran 8 or so drops per room, not necessary anymore. So i'm shifting the AP's, cameras and phones to ubiquiti and leaving everything else on the HP gear until it fails.
my core switch will remain Hp/Aruba, I have a brand new 5406zl aruba branded switch I haven't deployed yet. My predecessor didn't make a true core, but instead used a 5412zl to pick up core duties and serve that chunk of the building. So the 5406zl aruba branded will only have the 10G fiber cards going forward and will be a true core.
@burnt oasis "true core" is such a tricky wording :) what's true core in your case? :)
@jaunty talon a true core to me is one that doesn't suffer udp loss the way my switch does
To me a core is a layer 3 switch that all other switch closets/locations come back to. ISP > firewall > core > closets
MDF
Cool! :)
I'd argue a core switch is basically any switch that can do full line rate on all it's ports
i.e. it has enough switching fabric capacity to handle full load
But that can be a switch in the closet then!
yep, there's nothing specifically magical about a core switch
But in the wording of core, it's not very often used for closet switches! :)
Normally a core would also have some level of redundancies (PSU, two in-depended ASICs, etc)
For me core is somewhat traditional, and is in a layout where you have only L3 in core and then do L2 at distribution / access layer!
Fair enough
Most of the work I've done around networks recently have been in a DC setting
so there's no closets 😉
Well in DC the core would be synonymous with the spine
in dc's today there is similar tho, but spine would be "core" and leaf is distribution/access :)
yeah, core, spine
In my case my "core/MDF", is in one building where my fiber comes in from my ISP, and all of the fiber comes in from the outlying buildings.
Generally the stuff deployed as those were just low-latency high-throughput and redundant devices
But mostly for me core is something you can reboot in your network without impact since you only do L3 protocols with redundancy :)
I was a bit removed though since I was working on an SRE team though
Redundancy in my environment is hard to pull off -- though a good chunk of my network will have a full loop of fiber in the next couple of months so if I had a break in a fiber I could theoretically send it the other direction and minimize outages.
I work in a school - we can't afford redundancy in most cases. I usually have enough old hardware laying around where I can make something magical happen if we had a switch go out though.
A ring for me would be manual, i'd have to run down and swap some fiber to make it go the other way. Low-tech-half-ass, the public education way.
The only reason i'll have the ability to do that is we are adding some FEMA shelters and my path to the new closet in those fema shelters was easier to have them bury conduit instead of having to run fiber all the way around to the new addition.
Ohhh fair, I was on an SRE team for a financial software service provider--needless to say we had carte blanche for infra
Recovery should never be physical movement. If the fiber is that close nearby what is stopping configuration?
knowledge, lack of hardware/licenses, to name a few.
also depends on isp and their configuration :)
Also that loop would only pick up part of the building anyways. Basically we have three schools all physically connected with hallways with the "core" in the center. So currently I have fiber going from the center building to the far end of the north building, we are adding onto the south side of that north building, so my cable path is shortened and underground. Allowing me to connect back to the center from the far end north. So the manual way would be for me to walk 200' and swap some plugs. I'm lazy, but not THAT lazy 😄
@jaunty talon I was just joking
But core switch in Cisco language meant backbone, high speed switching fabric that is redundantly connected iirc
I would like a layer 3 switch but not the ones that can't do full router functions
Like the edgeswitch doesn't let you make complex ip acls
I’m not even sure what all the Aruba 5406zl can do. I probably don’t have the license for it if it supports it. We just do basic vlans.
@little schooner For core you want full L3 handling of traffic. This doesnt exclude all the one offs of say just L2 for metro-e or say a line card used for switching.
@hollow marlin what brand offers full L3? Mikrotik for cheap?
Mikrotik does have L3 and as long as fastpath is used its fine. The moment you break it thought performance craps the bed
Eh. Haven’t used acls but some edge routers have layer 2 hw-backed switching: https://www.ui.com/edgemax/edgerouter-12/ in addition to the normal l3 stuff.
Thoughts on fortigate anyone? I have a 600D at work. I probably barely touch the surface of what it’s capable of
Anyone have an idea what could be causing this. I am losing connection to one of my servers randomly daily now. My modem completely drops the ip and wont allow me to connect to it or ping it until I reboot the gateway super strange
Thoughts on fortigate anyone? I have a 600D at work. I probably barely touch the surface of what it’s capable of
@burnt oasis I know this info probably isnt helpful, but never used or configured myself, however i know at my work, they swear by fortigate, and install/configure for almost every client.
It was a pain to setup. First time I ever had to have a contractor come help me. Shitty part is I was so close, I just had one thing keeping it from working.
the support is meant to be one of the best
guys can you help me finding a new lan switch, possibly with at least 8 ports and not too expensive?
just google netgear unmanged 8 port
and find a store in your region that sells them
they should be relatively cheap (like $30 CAD)
thank you very much
yup
they're all pretty similar at that price point, I would just find the one with the best price/rating
this should get the work done
idk what they are
can you explain it lol, im new to networking in general
They're a way to virtually segregate devices on your network
I don't think it's something you really need
mh i reading somethings about it and it's an interesting thing
i wont be using it for now
but can be useful
Yeah, if you want something just for now get a cheap TP Link or Netgear unmanaged switch
and then in the future you can buy more fun gear when you learn more 😉
😁
and i have another doubt/curiosity about a server not showing up in the network
it's a dell poweredge 2900 iii
i tried to use win server 2008 r2 and 2012 but it still wont show up on the network
i got it configured back then with the old modem
you don't have an issue with the network card driver ?
with other devices no
bc it goes online
if i open google it works
fun fact i tried all the 4 1gb lan ports on the server
I think you might need to disable "idle state" on the machine
I think it on windows I will check really quick on my vm
F
idk what it is but when i boot it up it shows a "netmask"
@pearl patio the network's netmask or something else ?
for your "offline server problem" try this
uncheck allow to turn off this device
for your network card
when i can i'll try it
network
@pearl patio I think you let in the bios the option to launch windows using PXE Boot like the machine is given an IP then It can boot up using another server
i hope it work, im excited to see if 15k rpm sas hdd is fast lol
kinda
i want to fix this issue so i can use it as nas for files and a streaming server for films or tv shows
now that i think about it one time i used unraid
and i had to acces to it seaching the ip on google
yup that indeed interesting
after if you want to dive into advanced stuff, you can replace the server's ip with a local domain that you can create easily on your w server
something like mynas.local
it's a vast but still a great domain to explore
keep searching and don't give up on something difficult that's how you can learn and master stuff
What router do you recommend that better then Comcast all in one for 2 gamer and there phone and one office pc and printer
depend on your budget tbh
Something they don't lag when one person upload
I'm using 5400 rpm disks in my NAS
it's not really slow I'd say
each hard drive is like ~100MBps. once you put it into raid your network will become the bottleneck
@hollow marlin it says in fastpath documentation that you can't have any firewall rules configured for it to work
thats disheartening
@raw timber what would your budget be for that router.
And what could also cause the issue is your speed from your ISP (internet service provider). So do you know which speeds you get from your ISP?
@raw timber also important to know is that getting a new router will not likely solve your problem if you still need to have the ISP's modem/CPE infront of the router. this since the modem could very likely be the problem (poor buffers etc).
LMFAO Cisco cancelled Cisco live for today... “In light of all we see going on in the United States and around the world, including feedback from some of you and our customers, we don’t believe the time is right to host an event in the middle of this tragic moment in our history. Our hope is that we can all use this time to process, heal and define the actions we will take to make progress towards a better, more inclusive world.”
I feel like they knew it was going to be bad so they killed it
No reason to cancel a virtual event
companies are cancelling lots of events going on in the next few weeks. PS5 release, COD updates etc

It's all virtue signaling. They don't care. They want the points
These decisions are profit driven some how I'm sure
probably through advertising and sharing posts. while the whole thing is going on in america, thats all over twitter and other socials. theres no room for other companies' posts to be shared
Makes sense
I don't doubt the virtue signalling at all for some, but I dunno. Seems MORE for a lot of em.
@clear igloo thots?
Meh
@little schooner Fasttrack handles firewall rules, just an extension of Fastpath. You know, all super clear in their documentation 🙃
@hollow marlin ouch. They have to step up their doc writing then
@waxen scroll yesterday I was up until 1:30am working on a Logic Gate assignment, designing the diagram based on output expressions. Since when does a network technician use this stuff?
It's the stuff with AND, OR, NOT and NAND gates
Annoying to do when I have like 29372722 different things to do
@little schooner Only 29372722 things to do?
they dont
😛
@jaunty talon i was told the isssue was other router not leave room for when you dowload data you computer have to send a small amout back ohter rotuer let some upload to max and not leave any room
@waxen scroll sorry for the lack of context, but yes, my school does self host their webex. Today it says that the webex site is unavailable for my classes
well... no lecture unless they can get that fixed up today
@raw timber sorry, not really understanding what you're saying now. :/
is most router are not smart we had the same issue with the isp at my parent home we just put a pfsence router set up correct and with a limit on the speed to right below the max of the isp no more issue
depends on issue I guess. don't really see how limiting your connection under a specific speed would solve the issue? unless your problem is that it lags when you max out your internet connection in which the problem will continue no matter what limitation you put if you reach it
it work thre so many vidoe about people say ot put the limt t osovle the issue is upload get max out and dont leave any room for the computer to say i got the data you can send more
Limiting the upload serves no purpose unless you are doing per client or QoS
it work
Amazon Affiliate Store
➡️ https://www.amazon.com/shop/lawrencesystemspcpickup
Gear we used on Kit (affiliate Links)
➡️ https://kit.co/lawrencesystems
Try ITProTV free of charge and get 30% off!
➡️ https://go.itpro.tv/lts
Use OfferCode LTSERVICES to get 10% off your order at
...
that the type of limt i am talkg about
but that indeed is related to buffers =)
I hate when people claim you can fixed buffer bloat at home
but it work
wtf is buffer bloat
@hollow marlin why do you say it dont work we use to get the issue all the time now we dont all because it go to 300 not 309 or 357
I tried reading the website about it and none of it makes any sense
iqrouter explan it the best it is clien seend too much data for the small isp pipe
and stuff get drop
grand i dont liek them but there explain make sence
@nocturne harness Buffer bloat is when egress buffers are too large and latency increases, somtimes to the point TCP reports lost ACK
Typically with QoS and people who dont know how and when to configure it add large queue sizes
interesting
Not sure why normal TCP congestion control wouldn't solve the issue
but 🤷♂️
This is very typical in cheap modems/cpe's from ISP's
"Some communications equipment manufacturers designed unnecessarily large buffers into some of their network products." 
This is not in the endpoint, this is in the transport
I don't get your point?
Congestion control works for any part of the path from server to client
Buffer bloat is in the transport...not the customer router, not the modem
Congestion control handles this as you said
wow, I think I've found the first wrong technical description of something on Wikipedia
To TCP, a congested link can appear to be operating normally as the buffer fills. The TCP algorithm is unaware the link is congested and does not start to take corrective action until the buffer finally overflows and packets are dropped.
TCP uses RTT in calculating timeouts, so congested networks would quickly violate the timeout
Timeout = Estimated RTT + 4 * Deviation RTT
and with Tahoe and Reno a timeout results in a new slow start
Keep in mind none of this is impacted by the network between server and client
there's no way for the network to obfuscate congestion to TCP
since it tracks it exclusively on either end
i am still confue it wokr
we use to get lock up oftne when some uplaod a huge file while we use thecomputer live stream have issue now we dont
even simple QOS would probably have solved the issue
now that I think about it you probably aren't using TCP for both, otherwise it could never happen
TCP connections inherently equally share network links due to magic
That description is correct, they are referring to the time it takes until the buffer fills and drops the packet the far end has already thought it was lost and started slow start
TCP connection sometime will share nicely but sometimes will be subject to TCP syncronization. Also with Qbic, Quic, BBR....standard TCP algorithms can be torn apart
on a normal network the RTT should be low enough that this is not a problem, because the timeout should be low that timeout occurs before the local buffer is filled
unlesss you have bad behaving local clients, I can't imagine how it would happen normally
With buffer bloat your buffers can exceed a few 100ms
This is due again to incorrect QoS setup
Agreed, nothing a well setup QoS couldn't solve
Queue gets full so they turn up the queue and all of a sudden you have traffic is 1s latency
QoS is largely useless, as most people dont understand when and when not to use it
Its not needed anymore in 99% of use cases
TCP connection sometime will share nicely but sometimes will be subject to TCP syncronization. Also with Qbic, Quic, BBR....standard TCP algorithms can be torn apart
@hollow marlin this is the only thing I don't know about
but what in the video wokr
form my understanding of tahoe and reno, I can't see how they would not reach an equilibrium
what would
Multiple TCP connections
tahoe and reno are two of the protocols governing how TCP connections transmit data
tahoe is extinct, reno is only used by Netflix as they modded the hell out of it. Cubic is the main TCP used today
Yeah reno is trash but Netflix has such a good job at making it work very well
We only talked about the implementation of tahoe and reno in my networks course--probably because they're simpler to implement
Have you heard about Elastic-TCP
Take some time to look at BBR from google. Will load balance with other BBR streams and will absolutely crush Cubic/reno
Yeah I was just reading up on BBR
I like how Google claims it's fair with Cubic but most other researchers says it's unfair
tbh I'm excited for more IPv6 prevelance
Its a civil war. I am all for full BBR because it eliminates dirty traffic (un-necessary re-transmission) which makes congestions worse
ECN is used in v4 as well but its only used with QoS
i am still confuse on how this relate to my issue
It was more with a discussion on buffer bloat really
If cutting your upload worked, I have no answer as of why
why doint you know why i think it is 2 difer issue i think the issue is a lot of isp sofware limit i have 300/300 but realy they set it as 309 but it cause isse
becaser it is not as stable at that extra speed
There will typically be a burst allowance for connections whenthere is not much traffic over all.
some isp i thinnk comcaast and some people hate it
it can be long enouth that speed test look great
but you go dowload a file and it not very good
Does anybody have any clue whats going on. I have a server that I connect to everyday via ssh. Everyday since last week it has been completely dropping out connection to it. Only for me this is happening to once I restart my modem I can connect to it again. I have never seen this before
easiest guess is that your modem/router can't maintain the connection for any reason
is 10.0.0.1 the router or your pc?
Sorry for the stupid question, haven't used tracert in a while
my gateway
basically your router states it can't connect with that protocol
yea I mean the ip is completely unreachable
until I restart it
then its good for about 12 hours
very odd
the server is on the same network?
no
its in a datacenter which I have other servers as well this is the only one this happens to
so the network diagram for the connection is: pc -> router -> internet -> DC router -> server
who make the router sound like my issue a long time ago it was old router
shitcast
^ that. It could be a problem with your router or the DC router
or anything in between
yea and its only happening to me other people no issues to this server
time to get rid of this comcast modem anyway
is it all in one care to share image or modle of it
i recoamnd go to this site https://approvedmodemlist.com/
Approved modems for Comcast XFINITY, Charter Spectrum, Cox, SuddenLink, CenturyLink, Midco, WOW!, Cable ONE, and more - updated monthly.
@wild seal that's a protocol problem. Nothing to do with Comcast
yea?
The response is from the router to the local device.
what is weird is the traceroute from the gateway itself looks ok
but no devices on the network can hit that ip
did you even check to see if the modem is on the list
pretty sure its a /31
That's why...well mostly if on the same network
matt its approved by them its literally the modem they lease to you ^^
@wild seal When you try pinging the IP from a PC what response do you get
@wild seal look up on google load of people say the modem comcast lease to you is trash
Are there any firewall rules? Are multiple networks involved here?
So I have google nest wifi points but im hardwired right to the modem / router
So Modem/Router is all in one then a google nest hub and im hardwired to the modem/router
no firewall rules
Is the server also directly off the modem or on the nest?
server is not located here but it is directly off a modem not behind a firewall
Wait. So do you have any tunnel setup or just a server plugged in on some modem remotely and you are plugged into your modem? Because without a tunnel that will not work
not sure exactly on the server setup since its at a colo but no tunnel just public ip connecting to
I guess I can try connecting to it via local ip when I vpn in
and see if that works
10.x.x.x would be local so you'll need your VPN.
Outside a VPN you'll need the public.
so the 10.0.0.1 is the reply im getting when i ping the public
Yeah, youre getting a response from an 10.0.0.1 within Comcast Network which they have locked down
That's why you are getting the protocol denied message
I mean I literally restart my modem and i can connect again
Without a tunnel or VPN setup within the modem I don't see how that's possible
yea I mean doesnt make much sense has to be something with the modem
I don't think it has anything to do with the modem. If you are plugged in directly to the modem either you have a public IP or you don't, VPN cache is where the 10.x response is from and you should be connecting to 10.0.0.2 over the VPN only
what do you know I restart the modem and I can hit the server again ><
did you talk to who host the sever
yea they want more info just weird that it only happens to me
ill have to dig a little deper
deeper*
thanks for the help guys
yeah i run in to it too people say it must be me since it only hapen to me
my dad blame usless people updat for no reason just becaer it new
and look bestter
better
memtest takes forever. but IPMI to mount the iso is so awesome
@vapid dune yes, especially when that function is very stable
No nonsense working
a bit over kill but finally finished testing 1 round of all 32GB memory
Been a while since i’ve been here but i’ve run into a problem that i can’t figure out for the life of me, been troubleshooting all day.
I pay for gigabit from Xfinity. Wired directly to the network I get exactly that for download. i use pfSense as my router with vlans to a unifi switch and 3 UAP-AC-Lites. wireless speeds is what is a thing to make me flip, I get a max of 150 down no matter what i try and change. I have 2 SSID’s. Guest and Client. Does anyone know what the issue is?
tried it, same result
are all the interfaces gb?
Yep
have you tried a speed test within your network?
Tried a linksys router in ap mode and got 450Mbps down and wired to my laptop and got 1.2Gbps down
so. what you're saying is a linksys router is a better AP than UAP
in my current case, apparently so and i don't like it
What make it weird is this just started happening. my speeds used to be perfect
@raw verge Well what devices are connected? If a single device connects at N it will force all other devices to use that band
Looking at the unifi app, I have 5 devices connected. All of which say 5.0Ghz in green
@raw verge Are they connected N or AC though?
He said with another AP gets 450 while 150 is typical with N band. Im 100% positive a device is connecting with N
I mean I stand in front of my AP sometimes and it doesn't get super crazy speeds on my phone
Did what i didn't want to do and factory reset them and readopted to the controller. they seem to be preforming significantly better at about 350Mbps. 
magic
love technology sometimes
@raw verge i love it when it just works
xeon, baby, hi
lol that moment when you realize you were trying to login to the wrong ssh server the whole time
Hmmm, I just got the UniFi AP I ordered, but needing some help on the PFSense side to hook it up. I have a 4 port NIC with port 1 setup as WAN, port 2 as LAN, and 3-4 as OPT1 and OPT2. I have the AP hooked up to OPT1, am I supposed to bridge it with LAN or something? I don't plan on keeping the TP-Link router hooked up once I have this set up, but for now I am.
on an ERL I just run one port to a switch first and plug stuff into that
Honestly I don't have the best locations for this hardware in the house for now, hopefully building on my property soon, so I try to limit how much hardware I'm adding in the dining room! xD
make the ap your table decoration
lol somehow I locked myself out of my GCP VPN VM
I mean, it's running just fine but I can't SSH in 😆
@waxen scroll I'm no baby but hey
@rocky badge I ended up not getting the unifi switch and went with edgeswitch. It was hard to give up the command line
oof
weirdo
@waxen scroll I don't like to tinker when I'm doing summer class
whatever.
I'm considering getting cameras for my home, but don't know much. I was thinking of getting a few of these (https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07C5JWK4K/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&psc=1&linkCode=sl1&tag=thehookup00-20&linkId=9f8e83696c83ad3e0cb7c074f9b17881&language=en_US&sa-no-redirect=1#customerReviews or https://smile.amazon.com/Reolink-Outdoor-Surveillance-Security-RLC-420-5MP/dp/B07FQ2T89L/ref=as_li_ss_tl?keywords=RLC-420&qid=1562879547&s=gateway&sr=8-3&linkCode=sl1&tag=thehookup00-20&linkId=92a2a3d1bd6a61fc8312146ee73873c7&language=en_US&sa-no-redirect=1) and upgrading my FreeNAS PC with more storage. I was considering going with Ring or similar, but I want stuff stored locally and don't want to pay a subscription fee. I also have a Unifi system (Dream Machine so no Unifi Protect ; ( ).
@vapid dune more often than I'd like
But with cli, I can launch an ssh script on login to make a set of quick changes and revert them back the same way
If I need to test something quick
fucking hell, I'm stressing out over here bridging ports! 4 port nic, port 1 is WAN, port 2 is LAN, to make port 3 and 4 bridged with LAN I have to do what in PFSense?
Trying to follow this guide and then it loses me at "Navigate back to the Interface Assignments tab and change the LAN interface port to BRDIGE0" : https://protectli.com/kb/how-to-enable-lan-bridge-with-pfsense/
I lose connection but connecting to port 3 and 4, which is supposed to now be assigned to Bridge, should get me back to connection? If so, I'm then supposed to go back in and change what was LAN to OPT3? which should be my 4....wut???
How is that supposed to work, give me connection back on ports 3 and 4, if they're only supposed to be with default settings which means no configuration past enabled....
@valid sonnet You can run RouterOS on the CRS112 without penalty as long as you hardware offload all switching and do not attempt to do any routing, but the switch chip in the CRS1XX series sucks in comparison to the 3XX ones.
Less features, less capable
depend on the model
So, I ended up having to connect the UniFi AP LR along with the router as I couldn't figure out the bridging last night, it worked as expected but another thing though, issue maybe?, is it does it's own DHCP?
Like my phone, I already had a static IP address addressed to it with PFSense but now connected to the AP it shows a different MAC so now it's once again assigned to a random address in the DHCP pool.
the AP doesn't do DHCP
must mean what ever you plugged into is doing it
I would guess your second router isn't acting as a switch
Why set your phone as a static? Android and iOS have already implemented random MAC add. generation which is why you are seeing a new MAC
oh the mac randomization? it's per AP as far as I know. and default is off
oops missed the part about different mac
oh weird. I didn't explicitly turn mine off on my pixel
I did turn off DoH though lol
lol I would for a few more months when everything slowly gets sorted out
nah I don't use it since I'm using a home vpn
Unless the VPN is being hosted in the cloud or local DNS using DoH, that doesn't really apply
Yes, and if you are hosting the VPN at home, your request are still sent out that connection and viewable
yes sure, but there's only a handful of ways to mitigate against that
I don't expect to use TOR at home
finding a trust worthy VPN is also difficult
DNS with DoH or a router that supports it are easy solutions
DoH only moves the problem
That as well
you're still going to be connecting to the IPs lol
I mean if you're worried about DNS security, then unbound with DNSSEC is probably sufficient
Well of course. The main reason people want it is to hide it from their ISPs
I was using DoT for a while
if they want to hide from their ISP then VPN is a better option imo
Which while a cool concept, in practice, meh
I mean it moves the problem onto trusting who ever the VPN uses
I don't think DoH is a good idea really
Why set your phone as a static? Android and iOS have already implemented random MAC add. generation which is why you are seeing a new MAC
@hollow marlin this is only for when searching for wifi networks
aside from the bootstrapping problem
Thats why VPN through Assure or Amazon is the best option
LOL
you're kidding me
Azure or Amazon probably log your traffic just as much
@nocturne harness hmm I think randomized mac per AP is actually default
might just be my legacy connections from migration that don't use it
not my phone but that's what my screen looks like on my wifi settings
Starting in Android 8.0, Android devices use randomized MAC addresses when probing for new networks while not currently associated with a network. In Android 9, you can enable a developer option (it's disabled by default) to cause the device to use a randomized MAC address when connecting to a Wi-Fi network.
In Android 10, MAC randomization is enabled by default for client mode, SoftAp, and Wi-Fi Direct.
Guess I'm not up to date with Android 10 😆
I think it was supposed to be even sooner than that, but likely will be delayed a bit
@nocturne harness Its not just when searching for networks
If connected it will persist with that random MAC
we just covered that o.o
@nocturne harness Its not just when searching for networks
@hollow marlin yeah, it used to be it was just for searching, then in 10 they changed it, scroll up 5 messages 😉
oh lol
all good haha
ugh I'm still not used to working from home with only one screen to RDP
I tried 2x screens and my RDP session blows up horribly
my work doesn't pay for enough VPN servers/bandwidth either .-.
Well please tell me they are using an RDP gateway at least
oh no, I'm just on VPN and directly connecting to my box
ok good. Last few months I can't explain how much RDP traffic im seeing in netflow
oh you mean it's directly exposed to the internet?
yeah but you're gonna get hammered by drive by attacks
Yeah. ISP engineer. Its a concerning amount
😬
oh actually you're a great person to ask this
my ISP modem running in bridge mode is accessible from my desktop by going to a 10.0.0.0 IP
but my internal router only has a publicly addressable IP assigned to it, so I'm not sure why it would think it can access a private network address through the WAN masquerade
Default route and directly connected is why
You router sends all traffic not connected out WAN, modem sees it destined for itself, knows how to get back to your public and sends it back
hmmm interesting
I was just confused because my understanding is that routers don't route private address out
They're normally non-routable address, iirc?
And there's no static or connected route in the EdgeMax UI saying there's a 10.0.0.1 next hop
It's shows 99.230.xxx.x as the next hop
Hmmm, yes. So it's not that the AP is doing any DHCP it's that my phone is showing a new MAC because it's connected to this new device, the AP, it seems. Reason I have static addresses is becasue I am using rules to turn VPN off and on on those devices.
I setup the AP with my phone, should the desktop UniFi controller program give me more settings than what the phone does?
Private routing just applies to BGP
You edgemax has a default route 0.0.0.0/0
yeah
Add a 10.x.x.x network to your lan and watch your connectivity drop
that makes sense then
I thought the masquerade would prevent the routing but I guess it's not configured for that
I guess that's more of a firewall policy
Yeah, all IP address are routable, caveats with multicast, but people tend to think private space cannot leave their router
There is a reason why firewall policies use BOGON list for filtering so your local traffic doesnt route outbound
Yeah, I think the confusion is because the private ranges are defined as being not on the public internet
Would there be any issues having the UniFi AP right next to the router? :/ I was seeing 80Mbps on my phone while I had it hooked up in another room, now I'm seeing 30Mbps next to it.
There is a reason why firewall policies use BOGON list for filtering so your local traffic doesnt route outbound
yeah, I realized I'm missing one--not that it's really the biggest of deals for a home network
Its not really. There are "security concerns" but in all reality...
Yeah my wirewall in rn is just allow established/related anyway.. drops everything else
Just inbound, you can still send request out which if blocked would break everything
Yeah, just WAN_IN and WAN_LOCAL rules
Would there be any issues having the UniFi AP right next to the router? :/ I was seeing 80Mbps on my phone while I had it hooked up in another room, now I'm seeing 30Mbps next to it.
@south blade assuming both places give your phone a good connection, it shouldn't matter
Also you phone would not get the static address if it has a different mac
since that's how the DHCP server decides what address to give it
If Unify has a live view of traffic or AP stats it would be good to post a screen shot
If you clone a windows vm, without generalizing them, are they still able to ping each other? I have two cloned vms, same subnet, same SID and different ips but cant communicate
but cant communicate
@cedar igloo I mean they cant ping. if i host a python http server on one, you can get to that on the other machine
UniFi Controller for Windows gives startup error, shows a very helpful "Start-up failed." and blank message window below, what do? 😛
I set it up with my phone but surely the desktop software has more options, no?
Shoot, figured it out port 8443 was being used by something else in the log, nice blank window.
I'm just gonna leave this here
theres two jokes in there
@clear igloo 👀 Xfinity Gigabit Pro is actually 2 Gig/2 Gig AND 1 Gig/1 Gig
@rocky badge lol, wat
it's just metro-e
Ah, ok
the CPE is just a Juniper switch
its basically their business service for home
1 static v4, static /48
Yah, I knew they installed a Juniper switch for the CPE, didn't realize it was metro-e but that makes sense
What Juniper switches are they throwing out there?
Juniper ACX2100
For metro-e we are using MEs and Cienas.
ACX are their barebones routers
I hate them
Farthest from an L2 switch you can get
Yeah that's what I was thinking lol
its a long process as well lmao
you have to be within a certain range of the node
your project has to be approved, might take 3-4 months between first inquiry and activation
cost savingsssss
$500 install fee $500 activation fee
oof
but they pull fiber, splice it, test it
iirc you also have a SLA lmao
you get 6 strands of fiber
2 active, 4 dark
@rocky badge is the activation fee really necessary?
yes
Do you know what it really covers?
Like town fees?
Permit fee?
Since they own the line, the install fee should of been enough
Gigabit over here is $300 a month
I dunno
@little schooner Probably has to cover running the connection into your house if it isn't, splicing fibers, making sure the connection at the node is spliced / terminated
There's a lot that goes into it
@clear igloo When we get AT&T fiber installed, I'm just gonna let the tech do whatever he wants to lmao And then when he leaves, configure the gateway for bypass
And if he tries to give me the pace gateway, I'll throw it at him and ask for the bgw210 because the pace gateway is shit 💩
Nah I'm gonna bypass it when the tech leaves
i do the same
i just shut up while the installer is there unless he tries to put software on my computer
🤢
Eww Comcast tried putting the software on computer on my mom's computer
No need for that junk
lol
I think I'll aim to switch to SFP in the future when I can
in favor of the ONT I'm using
...mainly because it's smaller and eventually I suppose I can get a switch
@rocky badge Then tell them to peer better 😛
lmao
Because with the local ISP I can get one of these https://store.ui.com/collections/operator-ufiber/products/uf-instant
Since they use UFiber OLTs
The contractor responsible for the trenching work laid off quite a few people so I guess it's gonna be another two to three years before I get fiber. oof.
oof
That's great. The ISP here uses huawei lol.
Lol which isp??
Bell

@nocturne harness They've been using Huawei ONT's since the HH2000, the HH3000 is direct in but still uses the Huawei transceivers
ohhh yeah bell
@dense moat omfgmgmgmgmgg https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/679716285927653453/718177831187906600/unknown.png
the UXG-Pro Beta is coming sooooooon
YESSSS
a 10 minute old, clean install of windows 10 pro cannot be pinged from another machine. what are some steps to figure out whats wrong?
Disable the windows firewall?
ill try it, but i thought pings worked straight out of the box
yeah
nope.
nope. both just in esxi server. nothing fancy
yes
both virtualized on same network in esxi
@cedar igloo Pings in windows do not work right out of the box. Firewall needs to be changed
i swear i never needed to do that before. does a default domain policy enable icmp when connected to domain?
Domain policy applies different rules
Disable the windows firewall?
@clear igloo This worked, thanks. honestly, never messed with any firewall ports before and pings just worked
Yah, if Windows classifies the network as domain as opposed to Private then different rules apply. I think it's Private > Domain > Public with how strict the firewall rules are
Sorry to interrupt guys but I’m having an absolute meltdown
I’m trying to use the DHCP server on my pihole but it refuses to work
All devices connected to the WiFi get an IP address assigned, but no access to the internet
What gateway address are they getting?
Make sure its of the router and not the pihole..also make sure its on the same subnet
192.168.2.1 which is the IP address of the LAN port (of the router) it’s connected to
How do I know the subnet of the pihole?
Huh, that’s weird
The WiFi is working on my phone
The subnet is the same on my MacBook (connected to the pihole) and my router so that should be fine
o.O
why do you need DHCP on pihole?
can't get your router to push out the DNS settings?
Because I couldn’t be bothered messing around with the DHCP of the double routers I have
I mean you need to disable both of the DHCP on those routers if you want Pihole to do it
I have
I see
I was having issues with my PC not getting an IP address
bit of a longshot, but if you ping 8.8.8.8, does that work? just thinking it may be a dns issue
Before DHCP servers were enabled on both routers
I was gonna say, you might need to figure out where your DHCP requests are going
and if the pi is responding with it
seems like a hassle
o.o fwiw my router literally has a field you plug in the DNS server that gets pushed out with DHCP. it's simple to change
ok. its not a dns issue
Jesus Christ it’s still going with the timeout messages
unix goes forever with ping requests
Ah
I mean that's from the macbook
it's a DHCP problem
I assume if you assign yourself an IP on the macbook it works?
I can try
diagnosing DHCP problems is a headache
two routers is also a headache
...have you tried picking 1 router. turning the other into a switch. using Pihole as ONLY dns?
Hang on
The router is still set as 192.168.2.1 in the MacBook settings
Maybe that’s the issue?
huh?
it's not DHCP?
I mean the other thing is that if you previously had 2x DHCP servers
the gateway pushed out for each would be different
This when I do it manually what it defaults to
the Pi can't know which gateway to push out if you're on the router 1 segment or the router 2 segment... probably.
I mean you can try to manually configure it. but see previous point about headaches
To be fair 192.168.2.1 is the router port the data would go through. But I’d think you’d want it to go through the pihole first
maybe change your IP address to the same subnet as the router o.O
Now it just says it’s online... weird
The subnet mask is the same as the router
Or do you mean actual IP address
but your IP address isn't even in the range
It’s in the range of the pi
192.168.1.0/24 (or 255.255.255.0) goes from 1.0 - 1.255
LAN2 is what the pi is connected to
can the pi ping 192.168.1.1 (or whatever the default upstream gateway you have specified is)?
If you are using the Pi on a different subnet you need DHCP relay. Its not worth it over just letting the router handle DHCP
The issue is my phone works just fine, and that is connected to the same WiFi router the MacBook is
I mean you could hang the pihole DHCP server, but it better be off of the single router
lol what is your phone using? automatic?
Yes
what kind of IP does it get?
192.168.1.226
and the gateway?
But router 192.168.1.1
Alright then
I hate my life
At least it’s working
Thanks guys
:D
Still doesn’t work on my PC though... It has a link with the switch and it’s all set to auto so it should work... but I’ll look at it tomorrow, I’m getting a headache from all this
For some reason it says the cable is unplugged
Doesn’t work on my iPad either. The hell is going on
Hang on
Did I not save the router change to 192.168.1.1 on the pihole
Because my iPad did just connect but the router is set as 192.168.2.1
Yup... good going, me
Alright, it probably definitely works now
throw it all out and restart is my advice
Starting from a clean slate makes things clear. You can make changes one at a time until you hit the problem or the solution
If it was my own house I would lol
But it’s my parents and I don’t think I can really do that
My PC is still complaining about having an Ethernet adapter plugged into it... while the LEDs on the back clearly show a 100mbit link
I wonder what is a good way to run unifi on a server while keeping resource usage low
nevermind. the unifi controller uses a lot of ports lol
oh interesting. docker has a macvlan mode where you can assign mac addresses to individual containers
Each container is already assigned a virtual MAC. You can assign one if absolutely needed
Any idea why an iPhone would have the worst signal to the UniFi AP LR I just got? 😛
The mini PC with the cheap wifi adapter that's sitting not even 5 feet away from it has a better signal.
oops I mistyped. I meant IP addresses
@south blade fully updated and everything? Was it a used model? Does it have a date code within the past year?
I actually ran into some problems with my new flex HD unit
It wouldn't provision correctly and would appear to be stuck for no reason
But after enough tries it finally worked
I love my FlexHD. I did have an issue with it not wanting to update properly but I just had to restart and try again
@fresh copper does it matter if I have mine on the floor?
I don't have a storage shelf thing yet to place it on for better coverage
Probably not too much. I think it's mostly fine as long as it's standing up
hey can someone tell me why my domain, and vps ip dont lead to the same page on the vps?
so http://51.222.19.119/ is my site and so is https://neednot.net/ and my domain is pointed to that ip but they lead to different parts of the vps
here is my .conf
ServerAdmin need_not@neednot.net
ServerName http://www.neednot.net/
ServerAlias http://www.neednot.net
DocumentRoot /var/www/webApp/webApp/
ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log
CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined
</VirtualHost>```
ServerAdmin need_not@neednot.net
ServerName neednot.net
ServerAlias www.neednot.net
DocumentRoot /var/www/webApp/webApp/
ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log
CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined
</VirtualHost>```
didn't work
that document root location might be wrong then
the IP uses the default location higher up in the config file
well hold on do i lead it to the .py file or where the .conf file is
because the .conf is /var/www/webApp/
the py is /var/www/webApp/webapp/
maybe this is a better question, wheres the index.php or html, or whatever file located
your website says
You should replace this file (located at /var/www/html/index.html) before continuing to operate your HTTP server.
did you restart apache after the config edits?
inside the webapp folder is this
did you restart apache after the config edits?
@waxen scroll yes i did
is it a cached result?
it might be since cloudflare
did you shut it down? i was trying to test and its dead
yeah i tried deleting the a records and adding them back
idk how long it takes for cloudflare to update
so i bypassed cloudflare and it seems like thats not the issue
open notepad as admin, then edit: C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts
meaning the server is working but the doamin isn't connected
put the following line at the bottom of the file
51.222.19.119 neednot.net
it ignores your DNS on the internet which is cloudflare and uses that IP
go higher in the file and look for "DocumentRoot" thats that set to
its not under the virtual host stuff
wait so the location to the default html?
yeah
ok
that seems to be where its pulling your site from
just wanna make sure its the same as the virtual host
can you paste the whole line? i dont recall it being set to a specific file
it should just be a folder
yeah, so for giggles do:
ServerAdmin need_not@neednot.net
ServerName neednot.net
ServerAlias www.neednot.net
DocumentRoot /var/www/html/
ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log
CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined
</VirtualHost>```
make a new .conf file in that directory and put that in it?
nope. you have to edit the existing one
httpd.conf or apache2.conf im not sure what its called now
not sure, its still loading for me
on the command line type "ps aux | grep apache" , if that doesnt work "ps aux | grep http"
im trying to figure out if its been told to use some random config file
root 1874 0.0 1.1 88964 5564 ? Ss 12:34 0:00 /usr/sbin/apach e2 -k start
www-data 1877 0.2 13.8 913076 69084 ? Sl 12:34 0:00 /usr/sbin/apach e2 -k start
www-data 1878 0.2 13.8 1044436 69512 ? Sl 12:34 0:00 /usr/sbin/apach e2 -k start
root 1944 0.0 0.1 12948 924 pts/0 S+ 12:37 0:00 grep --color=au to apache
ok so its probably using /etc/apache2/apache2.conf for the config file
try putting your config for the neednot virtual host in there and see what happens
oh damnit this is the stupid new way of doing it
/etc/apache2/sites-enabled
whats in there?
YOU DID IT
it's a mirror of my first super bad .conf file that is in the out dated format
haha
