#networking
1 messages · Page 176 of 1
I would expect fiber to be cheaper in most cases since glass is less expensive than copper
i see
I know that for short runs, a DAC cable can be a bit cheaper
I also think that the logic for the converter from SFP+ to copper is more complex but I don't know for sure
Yea, DAC is only meant for inside a rack
The cables are also huge
Anything much longer and you pretty much want to go for fiber
i think ive mentioned how my servers are at my school, well, half the point is allowing other students to have servers too. so, i said, lets get a US-48 as primary switch here, and it was ordered a few months ago, thx governemnt for being slow
I didn’t quite see that but it definitely makes sense in your case
you said DAC cables are huge, i have a couple SFP+ 2m dac cables, they are tiny, is it the longer ones that get really big?
I wish that my school let us have servers. The CS department has some servers that we can use for basic stuff but it would be nice to have my own server. Currently just got one at home and one coloed with someone else.
I was exaggerating a little bit but they are usually thicker than even UTP cables. I think in terms of the really huge ones are the QSFP ones or the 100G
i actually have a QSFP+ 40G .5m cable on teh way, so, i guess ill get to see
yay IB link between a couple servers
im pretty sure my nics can do 56gbps
@fresh copper so, I am looking for LC Multi-mode fiber cables?
what doesn't make sense to me is how they got glass to be flexible
Some glass is flexible, some glass is brittle
The actual fibers are very thin which helps as well. Most of the thickness of the cable is from padding
The answer why SR and even LR is cheaper on 10G than copper, is simple. You barely manifacture any 10G copper compared to fiberoptics which means much more R&D is done on SFP+/SFP28 :)
@little schooner are you looking for a specific type of MM cable or just a regular LC-LC Patch?
@jaunty talon I think just regular lc to lc cable
As long as cable type for sfp+module says MMF, I should be using an multimode lc to lc cable I presume
OM3
@waxen scroll I saw that but I didn't know what it meant
I could Google it I suppose
aqua colored fiber
if you did, why are you buying multimode
@waxen scroll I was just buying the cheaper one
Idk
My fiber knowledge is limited
I remember a tidbit that said single mode is like 80km reach
And that the price is basically above 100
Also I learned that network card interfaces DO make a difference. Like intel's DA, LR, and SR interfaces
If I bought the wrong card , a cable medium just wouldn't work with it
I was so close to hitting buy on the wrong thing lol
@waxen scroll does it make sense to run VMs over network?
it makes sense to run them whereever max performance is
@waxen scroll currently it's over 10g and I saw max speed of 212mbps
But you think it would behave more stable over fiber?
Like it feels it stutters but that could be because copper is high latency?
@little schooner https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/41730.html
1m (3ft) OM3 50/125 LC-LC UPC Multimode Fibre Patch Lead Duplex 2.0mm PVC(OFNR) at reliable fibre Cable manufacturer FS.COM. In stock, Custom Service on-line.
FS has a good pricepoint vs quality :) We use them a lot at Embark and I used them a lot at DreamHack also! :)
@jaunty talon thanks. And yes I've heard good things about fs. I was this close to buying their poe switch but they were plagued with supply issues during that time
All the way from August to December it would take to be available
But cables say they ship next day. That's pretty awesome
I couldn't find a video online that compared latency between fiber and copper while used in a vmware virtual machine situation
i guess it was very specific and that I would have to test it myself if I wanted answers
i dont recall the true answer for that but its nothing someone like you will notice
its a sub milisecond difference, probably in microseconds
and that comes down to platform level too
I see
So running vm over a SAN is basically similar to copper vs fiber
Well I wasn't saturating my connection too
it should be, but like i said its platform specific
thats good to know
At least the prof will be happy with the news
We asked the network administrator for the college to run some new fiber
quick fast we got declined
for example, i might have an ASIC that runs 8 copper ports shared 5gbit and then an asic for 2 fiber ports thats line rate
I love it when things are line rate
ignoring the platform at short distances theres almost no advantage to fiber
Yes. that means I can save some cash
awesome
it would be a pain to re-run everything
especially the junction between upstairs and downstairs
oof, that was a tough one
I was about to say something and then I caught myself
Synology NASes dont do 10G for writes at the small business level
but for reads, they do. Still...
it would be nice if they beefed up the NAS a bit
@waxen scroll ohh, did i tell you? My prof is sending in another quote for new equipment but guess what? it has things in the quote of stuff we already bought
I tried telling him to send it to me before replying to the email going forward with it but I still didnt get a look at it
so whats gonna happen is it will be processed and we are getting duplicate things we dont need
This was said a week in advanced before they needed him to reply back
sometimes I dont know what to do with stuff like that

no
and the file size is wrong. It should read like 998 GB
I deleted a lot of old stuff
@waxen scroll syncthing is one interesting piece of software.
i prefer one drive
@waxen scroll but with my connection, it would barely work
no fiber
I have VMs on SL and want to make sure they are backed up every week
onedrive works great for my mom
i thought we agreed no fiber needed
meanwhile im unhappy with 300mb and want to downgrade to 100m
Yeah after a point the raw speed doesn't do anything considering most sites aren't going to serve you at that rate
I did try to downgrade a little while ago... and they were like, no no! please let us give you the gigabit for a lower price!
they keep bumping our speeds for free but raising prices when renewal comes
if i drop to 100m its only $30/m
at least its unlimited
they took unlimited away from everyone and put it behind a $50/m fee
How much would you get with that $30 rate?
Yeah, same for me. Man I would happily give up unlimited to save some money but that isn't an option
@waxen crystal I just want better upload speed
Should I complain to my lawmakers
if anyone knows much about the quanta lb4m switch, im having issues with the web console on mine
portscan shows nothing
alright boyez i got a big change tonight and im gonna put on the christian music to get right with the lord
no outage pls
got the web interface, appears the new firmware it came with didnt have it, but the older one does, go figure
@waxen scroll gl, I know that if I told my professor that, he would of said "just leave it the way it is, I don't want to use vacation time to fix something that shouldn't of broke"
@deep verge well maybe it was a module that had to be installed with firmware.
no avoiding it!
I remember Cisco doing that
its easy to set a classroom and leave it
Yeh
I meant to say that it was internal decision
It was a lot of work to add new options in GUI after adding them in cli
@deep verge I'm so happy for 6.7, it's all html5
Finally, something worth using
Powercli extremely limited without vcenter
Basically nothing useful can be done with esxi without vcenter
Not even making clones or snapshots
That's vcenter api feature with powercli
i didnt say anything about vmware
i said vxware
which is the wrong name
its vxworks
5.5 or 6.6 though, version numbers are correct
remember, this is a network switch
now i have a problem where the 10g links aren't working
Well if no change was made, it shouldn't just suddenly break
But you upgraded firmware?
Yes that is breaking change
I would call it a show stopper if it was reoccurring
10g should always work all the time
neither of the sfp+ ports are working it appears
could be the cables, i never got them to show up a link either
regarldess of what they were plugged in to
I pretty much have the fastest possible internet in tucson thats dsl
Any1 know how to boost LTE router speed?
Yeah install a better antenna.
Does it have external antenna ports or can the antennas be unscrewed? If so you can buy a large directional antenna if you have line of sight to the tower or a omnidirectional antenna if not.
Installed on the roof free of obstruction in all directions is best. However you can install it on the side of the building too. Just find out where your local tower is and make sure you put it on the correct side.
I have an LTE backup router and just by chaning the small antennas to a large omnidirectional one on the outside of the building I went from about 50mbps to 90.
Make sure to get a mimo antenna. Poynting makes good ones.
anyone run one of these? https://atlas.ripe.net/about/probes/
@vapid dune Yah, I got one
nice. which version did you get
v3 I think
What are the considerations for having LTE for the house? Anything that snags people?
@vernal gust it makes for a good backup internet connection if copper lines are down or in places where running wire is more expensive than wisp deployment
I'm mainly looking for an alternative to my dsl connection, 6 down .5 up for 5 years isnt doing hot
Rural area and all that
I'm assuming I can get some higher bandwidth through LTE, and drop the expensive Directtv plan in favor of internet media services
it should be a small bit faster if you have a good lte connection
@vapid dune Yeah, I have one of those as well. V3 according to the atlas site. 😛
Is it difficult to get one? I applied, just curious if I will get one
Well, if you don't have any, it should be a matter of availability. They want as many as they can afford to deploy. So if you apply for the first, there's almost a guarantee that you'll get it. Especially if the network, on which you plan to deploy it, has none already. But they DO priorities increasing coverage in places where there's not already.
I have one too lol. no difficulty imo
Just plug it in.
I mean mines not just plugged in but isolated @little schooner
@waxen scroll I ran into a confusing concept. If I want to use vlan 1 as native vlan, having an SSID that isn't tagged would mean I have to make sure that the port connected to the AP is tagged for vlan 1?
Even though it shouldn't be?
Which is why I stopped pushing vlan 1 onto my switches
untagged SSID means it goes to vlan 1
@waxen scroll but the port is already untagged for ap for management vlan
then the ssid uses the management vlan
Yeah, so in this case, it not work for me
It was easier to just tag a different vlan as native and get desired behavior
@little schooner Unless you setup the port on the switch to accept vlan tags from the AP, the AP will behave as any other client, except maybe for the number of MAC addresses on the port. If you configure the AP to tag packets with a VLAN ID, it will do so, and the switch will either accept that, and put the packets on that VLAN, or it will reject the packets.
@craggy parcel hmm see that's the thing though. The SSID is untagged BUT because it's an AP, it's technically still "bridge" traffic, which then means if vlan 1 is untagged, that is still valid because SW to SW is tagged traffic as it travels through towards the end point
Meaning it could still work even if I don't tag the SSID vlan 1
But it was confusing to think it that way
Made a typo and fixed it
I would say, that depends on the configuration of the switch. If the switch is configured to allow and respect VLAN tags, it will pass the traffic on whatever VLAN the AP tags it with. If the switch does NOT allow tagging, eg. the port is in access mode on a cisco switch, it should either strip the tag, and pass it on the default vlan, or reject the packet.
So, if you do setup the AP to not tag packets with VLAN ID, and configure the switch with a default VLAN, the packets from the AP should be passed to whatever VLAN the port has as it's default/native/untagged (Or whatever your switch calls it)
Yes. Currently that is 99 for management of ap
Also yes, there is a setting that controls how switch handles the tag and whether or not untagged stuff in that same vlan is allowed to pass as well
Vlan filtering I think it's called. I can have it on strict mode or pass all
I think a combination of that setting would solve my problem
In edgeswitch, then it becomes a general port
I'll leave how everything is now but when 10g switch comes in, time to redo
50 mbps up is a lot better than what I got
My isp will give at most 10 up. But you can get gigabit down.
My ideal speed would be at least 100 mbps up and 150 down
That would be amazing. At school I can get 100 mbps up and down if I plug in.
thats fairly normal for old dsl companies they used to do a percentage and have not changed it to match modern times
100/10 any way
Recently i've lost a lot of speed on my powerline adapter
Used to work fine a month ago then suddenly i'm only getting 5mbp/s
and its very unreliable
i've been using the exact same adapter for 3 years and i've only found issues recently
Get any new appliances recently?
I doubt it's the sodastream
hmm...
Try unplugging it anyhow lol
ill try unplugging stuff when i get back home to see
what's a good price for a normal 1gbps network switch?
managed or unmanaged an how many ports
i guess you just want more port's right so 8 port unmanaged
arround 20 a 30 usd you can find one
Managed is if you have a GUI/CLI to configure it
managed can be had on all port configs but for just having more port's you don't need it it's more for in a business or if you have an complex network
ok
managed is also a lot more expensive then unmanged
not like that it's more if you have vlans
a vlan is a virtual network on your actual network like you have an entire network for guest and they can't come on your pc's if there is a vlan
ok
I was at a Lan and they were managing the switches...we did have an Apex dc ++ server running
For the average user managed switches are not needed right?
yeah you don't need it as you only want more ports
So i'm also having issues with my wifi, its been very unreliable as well recently. I only have a modem that has routing capabilities, is it worth investing on an access point? A friend advised me to get one but I just have no idea on what I should be getting to improve signals and not lose speeds
@drowsy sierra an access point or wireless repeaters can be used to improve signal coverage. But without a site survey, its hard to say exactly how many you need and where to place them
We technically have 2 floors and a basement, we're hardly in the basement so we need stable signal on first and second floor
The modem/router is in the 2nd floor
I talked to one of my co workers and they said its not a good idea to go for an access point and a router should be good enough
@drowsy sierra well, they are assuming that you somehow have the router in the center of your home somewhere so signal can evenly reach corners of your home or something
If the router doesn't have a strong array of far reaching antennas, then an access point makes a lot of sense
In fact, if the walls between floors is not solid and mostly wood structure, one AP closest to the center in your home should be great to reach the 1st floor
As for the basement, from my experience, it doesn't reach that well or signal is spotty. I'd recommend running a wire to a second access down down there
My basement has concrete
Which router were you thinking of getting
Well you either get a nice one and somehow place it near center of your home or
Buy an access point that can be ceiling mounted anywhere
And get better results
Give me an idea on what to look for
That or buy wifi repeaters
atleast the type of router and access points
I have most of my lights connected to my router and some tvs and google homes
Ubiquity has nice APs if you're willing to go that route
A couple of AC lites can do the trick
Even 1 might do the trick depending on it's location
@drowsy sierra from their Android or iPhone app. Or with unifi controller you install on computer
oh interesting
That's the expensive version but that's what I have in home
So you're saying I can just get this and not worry about a router?
Ubiquiti UAP-AC-LITE UniFi AP AC LITE 802.11ac Gigabit Dual-Radio PoE https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DRM6MLI/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_3J68DbN79DNM1
If you have a decent router now then just the one AP will do
Ah, yah, then you'll be fine
but now its terrible
Its the whole reason why I've been looking at other options
speed test on my phone on the 2.4ghz one is only giving me 41mbps
when i have 1gb
it used to give me about 200+
2.4ghz doesn't even go up to 200 mbps
or maybe that was the 5ghz..
Probably
You tried restart all the equipment?
Okay take your time
Gotta step out for a bit
Ty for the advise though, we can continue whenever you have time
Ubiquiti APs are nice
I have one at my house, one at my Dad's house, one at my Mom's house, and one at my Dad's company. They are amazing.
you don't really need to run the controller software all the time. just for setup
Even the app you can setup ad hoc without controller
how much better is the non lite version
@drowsy sierra 2ghz and 5ghz are slightly faster with more streams
None of the hardware, except amplifi alien , is future proof. They still are on 802.12ac wifi
I mean even the current wifi 6 stuff won't be good for at least 1-2 years
Also very few devices that support AX yet
so hardly worth it to upgrade if your devices can´t use the benefits of it
it's arguably not that mature yet either
@shadow shoal all my phones and laptops support ax
I'm definitely going to benefit from it
Oh nice
yeah everything AC here
its gonna take me another 3 years to get AX
5 if im not feeling it
@little schooner right?
@waxen scroll right, if it's ubnt. Yes
HP has ax aps and rukus too
@waxen scroll unless you talking about client adoption, yes
5 years
@waxen scroll case in point, only recently did 2gig security panels implement 5GHz wifi connectivity for my alarm company
And 5ghz has been around for ages
@waxen scroll sounds very legacy
@waxen scroll ever use a label maker that requires the battery to not be in the unit in order for it to charge?
no
oh you
I mean, was it really that hard to implement circuitry to detect when you plugged in for AC power or battery?
It's so dumb that they didn't think of that
depends on your budget
Well it cost like $200
I would think they would put it in
I guess I have to always keep expectations low then
@waxen scroll but seriously though, that is the least thing I would ask about a manufacturers product
Like I expect it to work like other charging devices
It's an odd question or trait to discover that doesn't work
Amazon would honor the return for me but I have to use persuasion
if im replacing antennae for an R6700, do i need specific antennae?
yes
nope. a coat hanger should work as long as you mount it right
what is the difference between a server and a nas?
dumb it super down for me plz. lol. fundamentally, it seems like the size ? thanks in advance for any help
A nas is more home based with a simple interface and a server is more enterprice with more advanced options and mostly no interface in 9/10 times
A NAS is a server, but servers are not NAS's
And that ofc
The term "server" is just a broader term
NAS stands for networked attached storage. It's a type of server that allow for access of a file system over a network. It is essentially a hardrive that you can connect to over a network.
Or multiple hard drives
thank you that helps. i like the explanation from @vernal gust . thank you all for the help . looks like im on the right track in my research
Wait but some businesses use "NAS" as a server. One distance learning platform we used made us download all vms from a synology public facing http server
They can be used interchangeable but is more commonly used for storage purposes
thats basically the root of what im trying to find out. can i use a nas as a small business server
and it seems like the answer is super yes
@little schooner The fun only really begins, when you use the NAS as a frontend device for a SAN. This industry's terminology is pretty confusing at times.
@zealous burrow That kinda depends on what that server would be doing.
@zealous burrow yes you can. Synology sells beefy ones where you can even virtualize things
But again that is more expensive than just buying dell server
too much beef isn't good for you lol
@vapid dune what about turkey
@craggy parcel yes very confusing
Just how SD Wan is confusing
im attempting to do it on an old intel that does have virtualization
Yeah, I'm not sure I've totally understood how SD networking works, with physical infrastructure.. Every time I read a description, they either talk about VXLAN or make it sound like it's just a central management solution for switches, routers and access points, but still tries to make it sound like it's MUCH more than that. 😉
needs more network UPS
yeah the network switches seems to be a thing of concern
ill have a UPS for it for sure
@zealous burrow What kind of services do you want the machine to require? Virtualization needs a LOT of RAM and diskspace, so does databases. A fileserver, just needs a lot of network bandwidth (You want the network to be the bottleneck, not the server), while managing a windows domain, needs a Windows server, which can be physical or virtual. So if your NAS can do the job for you, depends on your requirements, and the NAS you have. 😉
right right thats what im looking at . a nas seems fine for the duties i need it to do. im researching what would necessitate a big boy server.
basically what a nas does. file sharing over a network. nothing big. images and docs
@zealous burrow Images can be QUITE big. I've seen photoshop documents in the gigabyte range...
so big that it would necessitate a big server? with all the bells and whistles?
Depends on how the files are accessed. If they are used as a common storage solution, with people working on the files directly from the NAS, you would like lots of RAM and network bandwidth. Also you need a CPU capable of filling the network pipe to it's limit. (Most CPUs made within the last few years, should be able to)
yeah i figured out the ram part but how would i increase network bandwidth? a 10gig switch?
its an 8600k. not the best kuz it doesnt have hyper threading
thank you chano. i appreciate your time. i see you typing. thanks for the information
If you've got a few people working with images in the GB range, like for billboards, posters etc. you really need it to deliver the data FAST with random access. I suppose Photoshop would perform well, if you can deliver at least 30 megabyte per sec, which amounts to about 300 megabit per concurrent user. And yes, network bandwidth can be increased with better network cards, and switches. Also remember, that 10 people each needing 300 megabit, will require a server with a network interface able to deliver at LEAST 3 gigabit, however, each individual client only needs to be able to receive and send with 300 megabit. So the NAS and the server, in that case, will need 10Gbit, so will the switches. But your client computers will only need 1Gbit. Just something to remember, before upgrading to 10GBit all the way. 😉
As for CPU's I have absolutely no clue what you'd need. When I need gear for my job, I just call my supplier, give them my requirements, and get a quote. 😉
My knowledge of PC chips don't even allow me to select a new graphics card for my PC without doing a lot of research to at least make sure it's better than what I have. 😛
haha i get that. naming schemes are all over the place these days
doing research before buying stuff is also always good
100%
Yeah, and then there's the funny thing about money. I play games from time to time on my PC, but mostly games a few years old. And not enough hours that I'm willing to spend a good chunk of my monthly paycheck on the graphics card. Not making things easier.
@shadow shoal Agreed, but for work, the money are usually better spend just paying someone else to do the research, even though we all know their profit on the equipment they sell also influences their recommendation, than me doing my own research. It's just a funny balance of knowing when your time, and the company's money, are better spend on paying a little extra for new equipment, or you doing research to save a few 100 dollar.
plus that way you usually are covered in warrantys
Yeah i would only do that for myself, friends or family
But if it was for work they can just pay people for telling them what to buy
yup
I wonder when 10 gig ethernet will become consumer cheap
@shadow shoal Yeah. But it does not ALWAYS go well. I've had a bad recommendation for a firewall, cost us about 2200 USD in equipment, licenses and service, for a firewall that's collecting dust on a shelf. They somehow failed to understand what kind of traffic we had. I specifically stated we had about 40 megabit of constant VoIP traffic, which is very small packets. And they sold us a firewall that could easily handle all the traffic, but not that amount of packets. So not only did we have to pay a consultant to tell us, that the only thing we did wrong, was getting an underpowered firewall, but also had to buy another one, that could actually handle the task.
But at least I had MY ass covered. 😉
Funny, I don't thing I ever specified the brand... But yeah, an ASA it was.
lmao
Also the consultant said exactly the same, the architecture of the platform just sucks.
@craggy parcel 40mb of voice traffic? Call center?
@hollow marlin Nope, telephony provider.
@craggy parcel make more sense. I'd say, 40megs high. Our SRX550s handle our trunks without a sweat.
@shadow shoal Yeah, instead of integrating the inspection part, they just bought a software solution, put in an ESX server, and forwards the the traffic to the virtual machine for inspection.. Some bright mind must have thought "Oh, no this can not impact performance negatively, in ANY way!"
lol
@vapid dune 10 gig fiber is already cheap.
define cheap
you can do it for less than $300
do what?
A 10 gig switch, NIC for two PCs, transceivers, and the fiber
that's not cheap lol
@hollow marlin Yeah, we have quite a number of ISP's that needed phone service for their customers, and all those cable modems needs to tell us where they are at short intervals, also as IPv4 is quite limited, we use tunnels and internal IPs for the traffic, and therefore not only the SIP traffic, but also the RTP traffic will pass through our network. And the classification and inspection of all those tiny 20milisecond RTP packets will put quite a load on the firewall. 😉
@vapid dune $300 is cheap if it includes the entire network. That is cables, switches, routers and computers.
That's $226. Then add the cost of the fiber. (two connectx-2, 4 transceivers)
Way cheaper than what 10 Gig fiber was, and still is.
@rocky badge There's NO WAY, I'm gonna believe that a "GENUINE" cisco SFP can be purchased for $8.90. A price in that range, for a cisco transciver really sounds fishy to me.
I have two :p
@craggy parcel we're a regional ISP primarily focused on business hosted PBX and have anywhere around 150-200megs of SIP traffic throughout during the day. We had to move our metaswitch off some of the core MXs because the line cards with some of our policies couldn't handle the traffic. I've been there before.
I see they are quite low power, which could explain some of the price. Or the seller stole them from somewhere.
is mikrotik terrible or would you recommend?
@hollow marlin Yeah. Too many people focus on the speed rating in bits/sec, when they really should focus on processing speed in packets/sec.
@shadow shoal I don't like there cli
I'm personally a big Ubiquiti fan 😄
I've heard quite a few people, I regard as competent in networking, say mikrotik devices are great. However, never tried them myself.
Packets/sec is all we look at anymore. Some vendors are moving that way I'm data sheets as well @craggy parcel
@little schooner Who has EVER made a CLI that's impossible to hate? 😛
(Web interfaces are far worse, though.... )
Mikrotik is a love hate relationship
@craggy parcel I like Cisco and Edgerouter
@hollow marlin Ya, at school we're moving everything to IP based...The throughput was fine, it was pps.
yeah i only have experience with cisco and edgerouter atm
I've not really used the Edgerouter one, but I don't like the cisco one either.
I love UniFi more than EdgeMAX, but I have an ER-X I'm using as a switch.
@hollow marlin Yeah, I've also noticed that trend. However, I've also seen WAY too many datasheets not telling the size of the packets. 😉
The only thing using POTS in the district now is the intercoms at the high school and the backup lines 😩
Actually I think cisco has quite a lot of easily available data on thier website, that's well indexed by google. 😉
@craggy parcel I don't mind it as I can just multiply by 64 and get worse case scenarios
I guess costs.
All of the other schools in the district are using IP based intercoms.
but those deployments were rather "small"
Well, it's only cheaper till someone needs to service the old system, and no spares are available. 😉
Yeah lol
Each school has to have the appliance, each analog intercom has to be replaced, new racks and switches for the intercoms, etc.
Even moving from the old phone system to CUCM was troublesome for the high school
Same thing applies whenever my boss says "Well, if you make this feature in our software in this shitty way, it will take less time, and cost less". The answer usually goes like this "Sure, but there are these risks of things going wrong, the chances are ... Is this acceptable for you?" and if he insists on the shitty solution, he gets it, and when it breaks, and he complains, all I have to say will be "Told you so" 😛
😄
Just like someone tagging the switch uplinks incorrectly so all of the intercoms go down at a school
There is always no time and budget when setting it up but there is unlimited time and budget when it breaks
@rocky badge You can get quite cheap IP phones, that can be placed in classrooms and whereever intercom devices are needed, and for PA there's quite cheap solutions as well, even IP phones with autoanswer, or PA features built in. (Most SNOM IP phones has but autoanswer, and multicast features)
@hollow marlin Well, fixing stuff that broke is on the maintenance budget, not the development budget. 😛
The intercoms are from audio enhancements. IP phones are either Cisco or Alcatel Lucent
Oh, they have some sort of brand loyalty?
One time, someone was like, "Why isn't the gateway 10.0.0.1, it's configured for 10.0.0.3...and they changed the gateway IP.
Stuff with their gateways set statically broke...rip that guy
@craggy parcel Yeah lol
LOL.. Yeah, that's funny, it is USUALLY the first in the IP range, but not ALWAYS.
Haha.. Made to annoy. 😉
10.20.0.1 is the gateway configured for the intercom VLAN
I once setup a network using the LAST IP of the scope as the gateway. Lots of comments like "The gateway MUST be the first address" and the like, from people not knowing what they're doing. 😉 Also at the office one of the gateways has .160 or something like that, in a /24. Mostly because it was the first available non-dhcp address in the scope. 😉
I don't have such a fancy networking setup at home, mostly because I just live by myself anyways, work with IT daily, so when I get home, I can't be bothered messing about with my own network. 😉
😄
Also funny how people don't understand it when you buy a specialized device, instead of "making it yourself cheaper, with a raspberry pi". When you spend 8 hours a day doing systems administration and software development, doing another 4-6 hours when you get home, without being paid, is not exactly the first thing on your mind, when you can get a specialized device for less that what you would get paid for working the same hours.. 😛 Many simply doesn't get that you don't like EVERYTHING that's got to do with IT, and find it all funny. Yeah, I'd gladly spend hours messing about writing a hd44780 decoder plugin for my logic analyzer, that's something I see a fun challenge in, but spending hours putting together something that allows me to send stuff from my phone to the TV? No way, I'll just buy an apple TV for that. 😛
Yeah, most of my IoT is stuff like Nest, Hue, etc. But Home Assistant to add more functionality to them
Haha.. I spent about 1 hour looking at Home Assistant, realizing that it might do exactly what I wanted (Mostly datalogging from the hue motion sensors), but that it would take WAAAY to long to configure, and I'll just live without the datalogging. 😉
Hmm.. What TV have you integrated with?
Roku
Aaah... Didn't know they made a TV as well. 😉
Ok.
Hmm... Seems like my Samsung TV might be one of the supported models, as well. 😉
Hmm.. I kinda had a planned to get to bed before midnight, which was two hours ago.. So I better go now.. Bye...
my samsung tv was on the fritz so I had to unplug the smart tv. best thing to unplug imo
Oof. Only one thermostat @rocky badge ?
@craggy parcel the problem with HA and non alarm sensors is that it might not be instant
Mine is communicating with a traditional alarm and sensor reporting is instant
My buddy tries controlling lights with non alarm for occupancy like in a commercial building and there's a delay before the lights turn on
@little schooner this is the serial to Ethernet I told you about
Ghetto but instant
You don't want hass logging motion sensor data on an rpi BTW. If you're planning on using an sdcard, just walk away
I don't allow any of my motions to keep a log
I just do exterior doors, windows, or other sensors that only go off a few times per day
oh I see
I tried using the antennae from my Cisco AP, but the connector are too large...lol
@waxen scroll Well, the data I want to log from the motionsensors are not the motion, but temperature and light levels. I suppose they don't trigger quite as often, as motion. 😉
depends what you want light levels for
im doing the same with an all in one sensor... i just want it for light level
i have it at fastest polling (5min) but i dont log it
personally i dont use HA as a human interface, even though I made a GUI the whole point is never to look at the GUI xD
it should be like an AI and know what you want and when
i dont think blobby is using it that way 😦
like for example my front outside lights turn off at 9pm but what happens if i have a party and it runs late? simple! if the front door is unlocked, do nothing, then if it locks turn them off 2min later
an actual manual process you have to think about automated!
not this "i can turn them off from my couch" stuff
xD
also @rocky badge why hue? whats the benefit of turning your whole room blue for $70/bulb versus normal non-smart lighting (or zwave switch) over LED light strips that provide RGB accent lighting under cabinets, etc?
i dont get why so many people want an entire area an obnoxious color and be able to change it instead of actually doing theming light strips that enhance the furniture in the room
@clear igloo maybe im too old
my friend got hue lightbulbs and hue rgb strips to match the rgb keyboard animations
a bit overkill i'd say
hah
arent those strips like $70/20 feet too, and god forbid you cut them shorter and make it $70/5 feet
i just use chinese stuff
$10/25 feet
i have a 15$ sonoff switch to turn on my bedroom lights and a blue led strip from google assistant etc
happy so far
interesting... that fits in the box? i dont see that working in my houses boxes
kind of cramped for space
there are smaller models made to fit inside the switch housing
mine is hidden in the storage room
its been like 5 years and i havent expanded my switches. i only have two. now they're outdated
i do
cant you just slide it in the wall?
against code and that also means i need to do drywall repair and repainting which can turn into a big deal... you cant just paint a small area you have to do a whole wall or more
i was thinking of dropping it in the wall from the hole where the switch is mounted
we're not allowed to have high voltage wiring outside of conduit and the boxes here
maybe you are, idk
there are conduits in drywalls?
yep
i didn't know that
some places wont even allow you to have cat6 outside of conduits and boxes
looking at my utp cat5e going into the electrical wiring
@waxen scroll in the lab, it's a wire cable guide that's like a flat tray. It's all exposed
I guess our lab didn't fall under this requirement
@waxen scroll I didn't check specifically that but yeah
is it a bad idea to adapt different size antennae connectors?
Probably
But antennas are antennas
As long as the actual shit going through the wire is compatible and doesnt fry your stuff you're good
@little schooner /31 ?
Can someone help me. I just got the NETGEAR Nighthawk XR500, and when I try to connect to discord I get a message saying RTC Connecting and then it saying No Route. I also cant load into games, but i am able to connect to the internet and watch videos and browse the web.
@waxen scroll hehe. So technically he hasn't responded back to me yet since he is grading work to submit the final grades for the 4 courses he's teaching
Not yet. But soon tm
lame
@waxen scroll on the flip side, the Chem teacher didn't want to fail most of his class, so he curved the grade for F to 53%
lmao
@little schooner show us your home assistant install
@waxen scroll Just finished final paper work for new home. Soon ill be able to wire shit up the way I want to
hopefully closing at the end of Jan
o_o
sensors on everything
@hollow marlin I have: 33 alarm sensors, 1 multipurpose, 4 temp/humid thermostat addon sensors, 4 thermostats, 2 zwave switches, 4 zwave LED appliances, 1 smart lock
the system is mostly automating light states depending on many variables like security activity, time of day, inside natural brightness levels
some small HVAC automation as well
and even smaller, safety automation. it'll know if theres smoke or a verified fire
so like i warned before, if this logging isnt filtered RIP most SDcards
Jesus man, I cant wait to do the same
RIP your wallet
Rip everything
im debating on selling my house in 2-4 years, so im not sure i wanna continue to invest in that
i will prob rip all of it out TBH when i move
except the hard wired security stuff
im not about to support HA or anything else for normies
they can put their alexa in and be happy controlling two bulbs xD
😂
An yet here are you sitting with ur everything being able to be controlled while having it secured
you arent able to override the security portion if you got access
its just a service reading and writing to a socket to the security stuff in the background and you cant just tell it "disarm" without credentials
so like, you hack it and get the front door lock to open.... thats great, but then a separate system is going to trip if you open that door
lol this is what I think when people who go all in sell their house: https://vancouver.craigslist.org/van/sys/d/vancouver-home-automation-system-price/7029975201.html
lmao
that looks like ancient stuff
since its brand name that had to have cost a fortune
oh i see the prices at the end
yep.
would have loved to see wtf this system was doing. i can hardly believe it was in a house
tons of A/V
anyone used homeseer? wondering how that is vs the free stuff
looks like crap AFAIK
@waxen scroll I have HomeSeer currently. V3 needs some work, but hs4 should hopefully make it better with mobile push alerts
Support gets back to me quick when I have questions
I didn't see zwave first alert carbon and monoxide detector support for HA
link to product?
https://www.firstalertstore.com/store/products/z-wave-smoke-and-carbon-monoxide-alarm-zcombo-g.htm @waxen scroll
The First Alert Z-Wave alarm will operate with 3rd party, certified Z-Wave devices. Get notified of smoke, fire or carbon monoxide alarms right when they happen. Photoelectric technology is generally more sensitive at detecting large particles, which tend to be produced in gr...
oh really
mines ghetto lmao
[Smoke Detectors] -> ALARM INTERLINK BUS <- Smoke Alarm Relay Module -> Generic time delay relay board [10sec] -> Alarm Panel -> Serial to ethernet -> Home Assistant
Lots of links
i dont have carbon hooked up but you can buy a carbon module and do the same thing
its a lot of links but its 100% reliable ignoring the points of failure
zwave isnt always
i also have a water flow device to detect if a fire sprinkler went off
if HA notices that one of those things went off it'll unlock the front door and turn off any fan within its control
How much did the whole system cost you
what do you refer to
Well everything
the sprinklers and interlinked smoke detectors were here when i bought the place
the rest of it i estimate about $2k but thats with me doing tons of labor
if someone else did it, much more
one of the problems was i bought an advanced alarm system and the base unit and the modules for it arent cheap at all
this was because i wanted an all in one automation platform with advanced rules
i had no idea I would be using something like HA instead
for example, each keypad is about $200.... ethernet support, $200-300
if i expand the hard wired zones, thats another $100 or so
but its wayyyyyyyy more reliable and instant than zwave is
since zones are simple and dont communicate actual data, you can basically plug and play a crapload of sensors and then import them as objects into HA
as far as i can tell, the speed at which HA realizes a sensor changed state is under 1sec
@waxen scroll that's true. I know my zwave units have a delay
Like 5 seconds or something like that
But it did alert me when I left the stove on
bad boy
That was a close one lol
lmao
@waxen scroll had it not been for HomeSeer sending an email, the house would of started fire in kitchen
if mine got to the point of alerting the monitoring center would be sending the fire dept
At first I tried to sync the fire alarm with the monitoring company but
They said they don't support anyone's zwave gear except their branded products
It's really stupid and they call it Zwave ready
Lies.
thats another plus of doing it the way i did it. its supported as long as it connects to the panel
if i did this again, i might consider running a honeywell alarm at half the cost since i dont need it to be "smart" other than an ethernet
What happens when I plug a Gigabit switch on a 10/100 Access Point/Router?
Does it Gigabit or not?
The speed of the link is always the speed of the slowest interface
1000Mbps --> 100Mbps = 100Mbps
If you're asking about the ENTIRE switch, it's a port by port basis
Having one port running at 100 won't make the entire switch run at that speed
Just that link
I mean, if I connect the input of the switch to a 10/100 Router, is it still gigabit or no?
The switch itself will usually still allow gigabit communication between any devices connected to that switch, however, anything travelling along the network cable to the 10/100 router will only operate at 10/100 speeds.
That makes sense, thanks 👍
I'm gonna assume an AC1750 Nighthawk is not a good upgrade if I already have an AC1900 "Linksys"
I think I cocked something up.
I bought a Cisco 3560G switch. Works fine. But the OS was last updated in 2004.
So I got the new OS and flashed it on. Switch is working but the web interface requires a username/password now.
I tried running this in the console
config
username admin privilege 15 password admin
end
wr
But it hasn't fixed it.
Anyone have experience with Cisco stuff?
I'm not particularly experienced, but did you do login local?
No, what does that do?
I used show run | i username to check the account I made exists. It does.
I'm just rebooting the switch now. Some suggested restarting the web service might help.
You need login local and i hope you did copy Running config startup config
login local instructs the switch to login from the local user database, the combination username and password you entered
I did. I mean copy running to startup
login local just returns Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Gotta set it on the vty lines if I recall correctly
line vty 0 15, login local
vty lines are the virtual terminals used for telnet, ssh and http connections
More widely adopted now since we are running out of ipv4's all the time
Yes, but are those stats for external IPs? because I see a lot of places, even universites, still using IPv4 internally
yes they are
Is there a need to adopt IPv6 internally?
yep
Why is that?
some companies are running out of internal ipv4 (mine), if you decide to NAT and do protocol translation because you're not deploying it internally, thats a performance hit, perhaps in more ways than one
it also likely increases network management complexity as well
it makes business to business connections much easier as well since theres plenty of public space available
many businesses dont like to NAT and so when you have a private circuit often times they advertise a public IP space to you
your problem is then maybe you dont have space to advertise back
since IPv4 is gone, getting it is expensive
Ripe is also out of ipv4 now
Only afrinic and the other one that has ipv4 left
oh wait lacnic also has some tiny amount left
i keep trying to get places i work for to transition but everyones so lazy and doesnt want to kick off a project that big
Most companies are probably going to wait until the last time to implement ipv6 unfortunately
yep!
i got super close at one job to the point we were placing ipv6 orders with our providers and one person killed it because they didnt want to deal with it
Thats also a huge problem, people don´t want to put the effort in to learn
But i´ve found that ipv6 isn´t much more complex than ipv4
i think its easier
hex is great
Yeah it’s not. People just assume it will be harder.
Yeah i thought it would be if i´m being honest
But after i started i realized its not
the way you can subnet it and identify regions, countries, sites, then vlans is amazing
yeah ipv6 is legit amazing
I´ve been rolling dual stack at home now for more than a year and love it
The thing is that you could just do a partial rollout internally. It doesn’t have to be everywhere right away.
Yeah you should definitely do it in phases and plan it well
Should not be in just one go
for the confused here... <assigned prefix> : <region of world> : <country> : <site/vlan> : host:host:host:host ..... 2001:0db8:0000:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334
so you just look at it and know if you memorized
Even myself with only a /44 for personal stuff can do some pretty decent subnetting. I can carve out a /48 for up to 16 announcements and then still be able to separate those up into as many individual/64 networks as I could ever need. I could split those subnets up in some fancy system by nibbles if I needed to as well. If you have a /32 which is a common end-user allocation then you can do something more complex like LZ mentioned.
Yeah i have a /48 and that is enough forever
it seems like LMG doesn't have ipv6 yet
i mean, im pretty sure they deleted all vlans and went with one flat network because their usual network guy wasnt able to do the refresh so they got confused
so no, im not surprised that theres no v6
it is
in some ways it might be better that way though... having editors on the same vlan/subnet as the servers
with their limited budget it probably helps to keep it switched
if all these editors are on 10G sweeping videos and all this other stuff, that would require a super expensive layer 3 switch
it is cheaper to get a powerful router that can route 10G - something like a mikrotik CCR1036 or CCR1072
or you can give the servers with the network drives IPs on both subnets
a flat network is a horrible idea from a security perspective
also don´t need a layer 3 10g switch
can you reasonably pull fiber at home for 10g?
10G is so fast that most customers cannot really utilize it. I work for an ISP remotely and we have many customers who buy 100Mbps service and consistently only use like 5-10Mbps
The dream would be to be all layer 3 mm
I saw their 10G upgrade video and am a little puzzled by why they have an edgerouter and a pfsense
@tender hazel 10G router is not cheap
@waxen scroll I'm eager to know what grade I got for physics. I need to know if I passed it or not. My degree is 6 classes away
Obviously you passed
Then I can go for masters in cyber and info assurance
In Chem I passed
But physics teacher is quiet
Tell them to curve it lol
He doesn't respond to. Emails now
Oof
It's like vacation started for him immediately
@waxen scroll this was the Chem teachers response for ppl asking to curve/make it better
Please do not send any personal or group request for 'extra credit' assignments or grading scale modification (such as curving) at this stage. No such requests will be entertained. Also, moving border-line people to the next group is entirely at my discretion.
But in the end, he did it anyway
Kek
You need to graduate and get a job before the market crashes again
Don't wait on masters degree
eh really
thats bold claiming line rate on all interfaces
Who said line rate on all interfaces?
they have 8x10g, the marketing says 80gb throughput
Total real world routing capacity of that device is 20Gbps
You can get more in certain configs
But I would say you can count on 20Gbps total routing performance at least.
Route caching doesn’t really help performance like you might think. It was removed from newer Linux kernel versions.
The newer routeros beta 7 is on a newer kernel so no route caching.
But the FIB lookups are efficient enough that it shouldn’t matter.
I’m a mikrotik certified trainer actually.
Whenever you look at mikrotiks specs you get the best idea of the real world performance from the benchmark of routing with 25 ip filter rules, 512 byte packets benchmark
That’s generally what you can get realistically with that device
@waxen scroll I just had a deja vu moment right now. And I recall seeing the exact event happen three months ago
It's scary to see into the future like this
?
The same notifications and mail I received at 5:01
I remember going through this already
@waxen scroll oh. I know. I can't start masters right away
I will get job
PRIORITY
@clear igloo get him jr solutions engineer
@waxen scroll LUL
I don't really get why pfsense is so popular actually
the appliances don't look to me to be much cheaper than mikrotiks - if anything it is more expensive for a comparable box
I can't really comment on the ease of use aspect since they don't have an online demo
so all I can see are screenshots
and some other admins I trust often complain about how horrible pfsense is
I think I tried it once, and the interface didn't impress me, and the ease of use also didn't seem to be there.. but that was a long time ago
I'll install the new version in virtualbox
@tender hazel well, yeah they are not as cheap as building a small minipc box
But for a small business for drop in solution, it works I guess
@tender hazel you are talking about the quad core boxes on Amazon?
no, in general, compared to the mikrotik boxes you can buy
I mean mikrotik will run on x86 too
but I'm just looking at the throughput that the box for that price will support
Like that one
I didn't know mikrotik sold their own x86 boxes
What model are they?
They dont, its a CHR image you slap on any box you want
yup
or you can download the x86 version, but they are trying to replace it with the VM version where possible
comparable in terms of you pay a certain price for an x86 version of pfsense that can handle a certain bandwidth, but there is a comparable mikrotik (not necessarily the same architecture) that will handle the same bandwidth for the same price
Agreed. Unless you bring IPS into the picture, hAP ac2 basically destroys any router/firewall up to a gig.
4011 if you need extra rules or non-fasttrack
Also dont forget power consumption
yup - I wasn't really counting IPS.. I mean the problem is that if you introduce IPS you decrease potential throughput a lot
cisco? if you want to spend a fortune
we moved from cisco to mikrotik
for core devices that handle lots of Gbps Cisco still makes sense
@waxen scroll https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8MWl9UGwQo
Want to surprise that special someone? Here's an idea: http://cs.co/jlbYTvd.
Subscribe to Cisco's YouTube channel: http://cs.co/Subscribe.
We have a massive discount and 400k doesn't make my manager flinch
that's fine
but I work for an ISP that used to have to buy a $3000 Cisco to service <40 customers that a $500 MikroTik easily outperforms
Lmao I'm passing this around tomorrow
so our WISP saved like many thousands of dollars by moving from Cisco and we provide faster speeds for our customers
our bandwidth usage increased from like 350Mbps for our entire network to like 750Mbps just by replacing the Ciscos with MikroTiks.. because when we used Cisco we had to buy underpowered Cisco that could not handle the bandwidth we needed
What was your discount
discount? I don't think we got a special discount from Cisco
That's the problem. Current job and others have been over 50% off
even with 50% off, still not worth it
I had wanted to offer VPLS on our network years ago with the Ciscos.. but it turned out we could only do that with their high end carrier gear
we offer it now to business customers everywhere
We're doing mpls on ours
@tender hazel it's just mikrotik needs to make a better cli
It's confusing GUI too
And bridge logic
You love GUIs don't you
@waxen scroll no, just the bridge logic should be done at factory for me at least
Like how dell, juniper, Cisco and everyone else does
@little schooner I don't necessarily understand what you mean there
I used to agree
Because you have to make your bridges yourself
It's backwards thinking
I never had to do such a thing
Even on the Cisco switch that isn't even a thing
mikrotik switches you already have a bridge with all ports connected
you add your VLANs there
where is the difference?
That's not true
it is true
fully blank?
the factory default config for mikrotik switches is to have all ports connected with a bridge
with bridge vlan filtering enabled
As in even the factory defaults can be deleted by mistake too
Why is that a thing?
um because it depends on how you want to set it up
if you really want to throw away the factory defaults and set it up in some super custom way, you can
Yeah. Im just not used to it
I'm used to being spoiled by business supported hardware
business supported hardware?
you do know that their support basically gives you free support forever, right?
@tender hazel I know, I make a lot of mistakes but I mean vendor support and phone to call
And get quick response
And
Software is made so you don't need to make bridges
Every port is already in a bridge
😂
and what if you don't want that?
like I could understand your complaints if the factory defaults didnt have that
but you are basically complaining that if you choose not to go with the factory defaults that the mikrotik allows you to do that?
that it gives you the flexibility of not going with the factory defaults if you choose not to?
I just never viewed flexibility as a negative
@tender hazel I only remember my experience setting up the first one
It wasted more time than I could afford
when was that, and what model?
oh god, you are talking about one of those models that has hardware switching separate from the software config
@tender hazel maybe my mistake was I used routerOS instead of switchOS
routeros is better
but the problem is that if you don't have a crs3xx model you have to deal with the old really confusing way of setting up switching
which most people could not figure out
But that's what I was complaing about
they've replaced it in the crs3xx series
you can use the new method on the powerbox pro BUT you lose the hardware acceleration, the bridging goes through the CPU
often I use the new method even on the old devices because it is much easier, it makes more sense
and usually the throughput loss is more acceptable than the more complex configuration
but yeah, any of the CRS3xx models of switches use the new configuration method out of the box
and it is very similar to cisco or HP vlan configuration instead of the old style
the old style of VLAN config I was also complaining about for years
I was thrilled when they came up with the new method
so if you are considering any CRS3xx model device, I would say yes, the vlan configuration is much easier than anything mikrotik you worked with before
and in general I would always advise routeros and not swos
even for a switch
you lose too many capabilities with swos
it is maybe easier to set up but it is missing a bunch of crucial features
@little schooner have you heard of RoMON?
to me, RoMON is one of mikrotiks best features
hands down
and nobody really talks about it enough
we do networking inside of many schools in rural and remote areas and are replacing our cisco switches with mikrotik ones mostly because of romon
it is a management network formed over layer 2
you can access any mikrotik device from any other connected over layer 2 even with completely wrong IP configuration
so for instance we have had problems where some customer starts to unplug everything and plug everything in into random ports
and with romon we can actually still get into all the switches and figure out how the customer has connected things
and how to correct it, all remotely
Sounds pretty handy
it especially makes IP changes really easy
because if we connect to a switch over romon, we can change its IP to a different subnet without losing connection
even if we delete the IP by accident we are still connected
so there are a few reasons I don't like swos
one, it is web browser only, you can't use winbox, and winbox is a really handy tool
another, it doesn't support romon
it also doesn't support MSTP, only RSTP at best
also with routeros you get certain troubleshooting tools in the UI like being able to take packet captures remotely etc.. with swos there is none of that
and I also find swos quite buggy to upgrade - I try updating it to a new version and most of the time it fails, and routeros is the opposite
routeros can do CDP and LLDP, swos doesn't support that
so you lose tons of useful features, and the only benefit is a simplified UI for config
I have to explain that in our situation, we are so far from our customers that if we have to fly to a school client of ours to fix something it is like over $1000 round trip just for the airfare cost
so anything we can do to prevent such travel saves us a huge amount of money
we cover an area near the size of Texas from a single office
so it isn't like we can just drive a half hour if something goes down
Using mikrotik still gives me a brain bleed every time I use one, years and years has totally wired my brain 100% Cisco like so when it's not a Cisco rip off my head BSOD's and takes a good 10 minutes to reboot lol
@strange silo lol
@strange silo The more I'm working with other vendors the less Mikrotik stands out. Some of their awkward configuration is similar in Juniper, ciena, Calix, Versa... Cisco has simplified the configuration more than any vendor which makes it seem mind boggling when even in Junos I need to specify the same parameter in 3 locations
@hollow marlin what other config do you find awkward (besides the old VLAN stuff that was mentioned)?
@tender hazel what's an easy way to get hardware switching performance in routerOS?
@tender hazel My biggest gripes with Mikrotik is L2 configuration by far. Bridge and switch feel as if I am repeating too many of the same actions. But like I said, Junos and Versa are almost identical in terms of L2 configuration to tiks
@little schooner newer switch models (CRS3xx) are already configured for hardware switching with vlans etc
what model are you using? is it the powerbox pro you talked about before?
@tender hazel I am not saying I dont like tiks, I love them. As an ISP we have 1000s of them deployed. Just can be frustrating at times
@little schooner ok so with powerbox pro there are two ways of setting things up - there is the old way which gives you full wirespeed switching but is more difficult to set up, and the newer way which is easier to set up but will not give you wirespeed switching. Set up the new way you can get 1.6Gbps total switching speed on that powerbox. If you need more than that you'll have to set it up the old way
the new way is called bridge vlan filtering
which method are you trying to use?
@floral thorn Hola, we're solving all the things
@tender hazel well I want the old way because that's how I get wire speed on all other vendor switches
Why is wire speed hard to implement?
ok one sec.. I assume you want VLANs yes?
ok one moment, I just have to refresh my memory of the config
If you has problems with access drop just use
@floral thorn what does safe mode do?
it rollback all your changes if WinBox lose access to RouterOS
@floral thorn I'll remember that when I touch it again.
it's "reload in" as it shoud be
No shit, I never knew that! Thanks for that
QCA 8337 supports vlans with routeros, was just verifying that first
so this should be the correct reference for the config
yes, safe mode is always good to use when you are doing something dangerous
it's easy to configure bridge thinkin about it as a separate switch with "bridge" as interface connected to the router
the really important thing there is that switch1-cpu has to be added as a port for whatever management vlan id you are using
switch1-cpu is what connects the vlan with the vlan interface
it is like vlan 99 vs. interface vlan99 on a cisco switch
on cisco they are connected together by default but on mikrotik you have to include switch1-cpu as a port to connect vlan99 wih interface vlan99
everything on there is safe to do and won't lock you out until you get to /interface ethernet switch port near the end
so I would turn on safe mode just before you start changing the interface ethernet switch port settings
you can turn it on before you begin if you like, but turn it off and on again before you get to interface ethernet switch port
that way you won't roll all your changes back if they were partially successful
make sure bridge vlan filtering is turned OFF for the bridge
as an aside, (different topic) the support for ipv6 in consumer routers is really horrendous
