#networking
1 messages Β· Page 138 of 1
I'm checking throughput, vlans, and temperatures during test
Sustaining
To uncover if one is fake
Ah
The fake ones died out
If its sustained
And also dont reach 10gbps
And give weird errors in intel util
So far none yet
okay
so my house has no ethernet ports
so should i just yolo it and put a ethernet cable around the ceiling / walls
or integrate it into the walls/
Own or rent the house?
If you own, definitely integrate the cables into the walls, do it nice
Otherwise, just do the bare minimum to run the cables
I have done some crazy things to get Ethernet around the house. I do own the place but a lot of the walls are really weird and I canβt run any cables though them
Yeah, I ran ethernet in my house inside of the walls. I have to say everytime I go in the attic, it's so easy to get lost at times. lol
apparently enterprises split cables together too
So it's should be fine if I do it too
Even if I owned my place, I couldn't run anything in them. It was already a pain to bring fibre in.
Old-ish European houses are fun.
Not exactly, but the wires are running through tiny conduits.
Within thick stone brick walls.
don't forget concrete
It was made to run the 3 electricity cable not sheathed together.
i tried to sneak cables into pre existing electrical conduits but it was a nightmare and i didn't managed to do it
And this doesn't run with safety inspection anymore.
yeah, it's against the code to put low voltage cables with high voltage ones
Yeah,. European houses you'll have a lot of trouble.
i'm so jealous about american houses. It's so easy to wire them up
Usually here if the wall needs to be drywalled on a brick / cinderblock / concrete wall, we have to put a fake wall with a small space
with a knife you cut a hole in the wall, drop down a cable from the attic and you are ready to go
Yeah, pretty much
just find the wall in the attic, drill it, then drop the wire in. lol
and fish it out downstairs
It's only the outside walls that are nightmares to do because of insulation
still easy
Yeah, compared to concrete, definitely. haha
here if you don't want any external conduits you have to break concrete with a chisel, patch it up, paint it and maybe you get unlucky that the conduit is broken and concrete leaked inside or you made a turn that is too tight and you have to do everything again
i have few cables i cannot pull out even if i try so hard: like pointing the feet to the wall and push myself
haha
If you dont level it properly you see the trace
Modern house have wider conduits. But it's hard to retrofit. So I have cables running around.
also old (but not that much) buildings were built without expansion possibilities cause at the begin there was no TV/no intercom/no internet etc and when they added all those things this is the result
Yeah, that would trigger my OCD like crazy. lol
copied from the interwebz
If i will be living into a condo i want to buy it when they are still building it so that i can tell the workers to put separated conduits in each room for ethernet/TV and some more empty conduits for future stuff
Man, though just imagining have to concrete in conduit into a wall
seems super hard to keep it still
nah, you do it slowly
Ah, I see.
Yeah, I'm used to only doing floors
and dumping concrete everywhere. We had to like really strap down the underground conduit
to keep it from moving
Well, i mean the walls
Then you do the final pour
the floor is pretty easy
still the same i guess
Haha, that still seems really brutal to deal with
Here they even used pieces of metal screwed onto the wall
I kind of wonder how hard datacenters are to make over there now
well, there are elevated floors that can be lifted up and there is a space between the real and fake floor
But usually if they are building a datacenter they know they need to add conduits for wiring
That's really cool. haha
yeah, imagine having to run a new cable. You just lift the panels you need and that's it
Yeah, I'm totally putting a ceiling grid when I get around to building a house. lol
lol
Elevated floors aren't necessarily great for a space you're living in, but ceiling is easier. It's just passing from one room to another that can be messy.
lol welcome to club of limited connections π
i noticed like 2 weeks ago i was suddenly seeing my IPv6 everywhere
Usually the elevated floors in datacenters is for cooling up through the racks
Most cabling is wired via overhead cable channeling
mmm yeah, elevated floors are more common in modern offices
I worked many years ago helping to rewire some network cabling in a computer room that had raised floors where the cabling was run in it; it was a fucking pain
Would you prefer pulling out cables from conduits into walls? i did it today and i was sweating
Proper conduits are not too bad
heh
I have pulled cables through non-conduit dropped ceilings in offices, that fucking sucks too
i had to cut the cable in some point cause i couldn't find it's full path (also cause i had not that much time to do it)
Especially going past firewalls
pretty sure it is easier than conduits into walls
ofc it is easy if the conduit is 10 cm wide with few cables inside
Most of the pulls in that office were 50 cat5 cables at a time
sometimes it is better to pull them out together, other times it is better to pull 1/3 out so that there is enough space to pull the rest
Indeed
I've run networking in home by using the pull away sticky stuff and clasps on the ceiling, even worked on the texture paint junk that's up there and I cba to redo
MU-MIMO routers are not cheap at all
It'll be a while
Ebay or used market or craigslist or refurbish from store is best bet now
italia, italia, italiaaa
hell yeah
Has net neutrality officially ended or are we still wait in ng for our deaths
@fresh copper https://linusdrop.tips/AggravatingVirtualXenotarsosaurus
That doesn't seem like a fun game I'd want to play for 17 hours
he's coding hard
It basically gets rid of the ability of any website to easily host non-moderated user content. It would effect everything from online forms to mailing list archives to even google search itself, especial google image search. It was decided long ago that if a user requests some user content wether by searching, or entering forms for specific topics, or otherwise, that the legality of the content shown was not the responsibility of the website owner. This happened back when Google images first came out and people were upset that someone could search for something copyrighted and google might show it in the search results. This happened again with YouTube where people were uploading clips from Sponge Bob.
To be clear, this does not mean that any website can host illegal or copyright infringing content. If the copyright owner or proper authorities etc contact the website with things like a DMCA notice they still have to take it down. This just means that they can't be sued before they are given notice. If they are given notice and they still do not take it down, then they can be sued. The EU thing would remove all of this precedent (at least in the EU) and require all sites to either manually moderate everything or implement some form of filter that attempts to determine content that should not be on the site. This filter would have to have a significant amount of false positives because websites would have to be vary careful. Even letting one thing through could potentially leave them open to litigation. Some versions of the proposed rules would allow them to have some small amount get through the filter as long as they do their "reasonable prevention measures".
Lol, I find it funny that it considers terminal a game
But why. If it has been like this for years, why now they made a law about copyright and stuff for online pictures etc? Aren't there bigger problems to solve instead?
That's how the internet works. You put something on it and it becomes accessible for everyone rather useful or not
@rocky badge I've spent that long in a terminal for several days on end, lol.
oof
how does ethernet over coaxial work in comparison with powerline?
My house is prewired with coax but i dont wanna run cat6
Can't recommend it, and I specifically ran my house with both to deal with that.
Hell no.
@final epoch There is a version of Ethernet over Coax but I don't recommend it because it is a very old standard and therefor is very slow. There are a number of other protocols that can go over ethernet though. Most ISPs that provide internet over coax use some form of DOCSIS. I again don't recommend this because it is an enterprise standard and all the equipment is expensive. What I can recommend is MoCA. As long as you go with MoCA 2.0 it can carry gigabit speeds and is actually really good and has significantly less interference than power line even if it was run over the same coax cable as a TV signal. The converter boxes are rather expensive. I see them for $100-$200 here in Canada. The up side is that a number of ISP modems actually support it out of the gate and allow you to use it on whatever coax line you have plugged into it.
@crystal forge are those your only options? From what I have heard, they are both kindy sucky (customer service wise anyways). Actual performance unfortunately will depend on your area, so may look for some sort of local reviews site? But IMO, its six of one, half dozen of the other
@short relic those are my only options unfortunately
@rocky badge AT&T publicly hands your data over. Hell no no matter what area it is.
AT&T gonna hate me this month, lol
2.1TB of steam games to download + ~1TB of WSUS updates to redownload π
Nice
My isp kinda hates me
2TB of movies/Tv shows uploaded last month
- atleast 2TB of download each month XD
Got a parabolic tplink antenna and a ubiquity bullet m5 titanium. Configured the bullet for acces point and all, cant find network. Infront of antenna
AT&T put and undisclosed 150GB bandwidth cap on me, so I cancelled their sorry asses.
heads up for anyone using Devoloβ’ or similar ethernet over power line adapters, they will cut down your internet speeds in comparison to just connecting to your router.
Ways to reduce sound in a rack?
I would get sound dampening foam for the sides, but does that actually do much?
and what can you do to the front/back? at least for dust filter or so?
wrong channel @zenith ridge
Place quieter fans in said server's/switches
@hallow nimbus I replaced my NVR's standard fans with noctua super small ones
Wow what a difference in noise
Before it was basically audio for two rooms down a hallway
i will probably do something similar to my pro curve switch cause its goddamn loud
@chrome hound i can also use those sfp ports on those switches with that BiDi LC to sfp connector, right?
i want to make a unraid server. i plan to upgrade it later can i transfer old license to an new server
At colledge they threw all cisco switches out and replaced them with 4 times cheaper switches which work better xD
And the teacher replaced and corrected about 20% of the things cisco forces them to teach for the cisco certificates
And we no longer have to use their software as it's too broken
@daring plover I appreciated the Cisco curriculum when I was studying for CCNA because lots of the stuff they talked about could be instantly carried to other brand switches. The fundamentals and things like configuring stp, multicast,vlans, etc,
Netacad had easy to understand reading
10/10 prefer it over book reading
CCNA is one of the ones that we can get here after we're done with network management
And we threw Netacad out
It's overcomplicated
And things such as cisco packet tracer will even randomly ping incorrectly in the most basic setups
Packet tracer has it bugs but I used it and was able to pass ccna easily
You just cant count on what the software does but your understanding of networking concepts
I for snmp I did physical labs
Netacad is simple but if you have a bad teacher
It will be complicated
They literally threw out the best resource out there to pass ccna
@subtle glen I think so, check the switch for optics compatibility, but yea those should work
but after we talked the other day I don't think you have to use BiDi, you can just use a standard dual LC
well, in case it doesn't fit (even if i split the 2 plugs)...
i was also thinking about this transceiver https://www.fs.com/de/en/products/11802.html
Check Cisco GLC-BX-U Compatible 1000BASE-BX-U SFP transceiver module data sheet (SMF, 1310nm-TX/1490nm-RX, 10km, LC connector) and price list on FS.COM, buy now!
that was the issue though, I could only find BiDi that were single mod fiber, so your fiber changes
by looking at the plug of that one it seems single mode
well no I mean the type of fiber you have to use, SMF versa MMF
Buy 1m (3ft) OS2 9/125 LC-LC Singlemode Fiber Patch Cable Simplex 2.0mm PVC(OFNR) at reliable fibre Jumper manufacturer FS.COM. In stock, Custom Service on-line.
@little schooner Our teacher replaced a lot of things from cisco that were overcomplicated or even kinda wrong
And he simply threw the netacad out as it was the worst in those regards
He made his own network and website to replace netacad
Well, 2 websites even
π
@hallow nimbus What is floatplane
Floatplane is the early access service like vessel but floatplane is owned and managed by floatplanemedia witch is owned by LTT
you are so spooky
Yes i know
i almost broke the monitor for the jumpscare
π

i can't handle this
with what
i have a small media creation group. and each of us work at home. and we have a common storage server. and i need a good way to connect each of our pcs to that server. without hamachi or those shit programs
we currently use hamachi to connect to each other pcs
oh, you want to acces other's storage or pc?
i dont need to acess their pcs. but would be a good extra feature
they can open some ports
i can open the ports i need
we have 3 workstations and 1 laptop. with 2 other servers. one of wich is windows server 2012 r2
servers have hamachi asewll?
yes
but hamachi is our bottleneck
3mbs transfer speed
at max
we have 250mb down and 120 up
you could set up a VPN on your server/or create a dedicated VPN machine where everyone can connect and communicate
this would be one option
can you help me with that?
with setting up VPN?
well i dont have much time tho :/ you can try to play around with it in VM's at first to get idea about that
oh they are in same network?
How do I create my hyper v server's?
My pcs are in the same network. I'm hosting. But the other 2 pcs arent
And my school laptop
oh oke, then yeah VPN will do the trick
And a role server to access the storage?
i think no, since if you connect to the VPN, you can have access to all machines if they are up
currently im hosting all the storage in my workstation. but im ditching it
in that network
yes
ah then yeah, idealy you should make a dedicated storage server and a dedicated access point server aka VPN server
this is all the disks
i just need to find a old pc with enought sata ports and use freenas or something
yeah, its not nessesarily needed, but strongly recomended
or maybe a 4tb drive
but yeah you should play around with this at first on VM's
the disk's in raid 0 wouldve looked little nicer tbh π
windows will allow to do that?
my motherboard is too old for that
im on 775
my pc is kinda broken
mmh dont know much about older boards
2 is minimum, and all dependant of your resources too
uh, yea i wouldnt go over 2 VM's there
what do i need to get everything working?
well a VPN server is really the only thing, when looking at your original issue, rest is just "best practise"
or maybe, your router supports a VPN "server" feature
heh oke
this is "advanced"
should i reset my windows server? i think that is a bit fucked up
uhh, i dunno, if you saw its fked up, then i guess π
kek
yeah π hope i have time later on π
thanks
Anyone ever dabble in port forwarding on a pfsense firewall?
Yee
Anyone ever do L2TP on Linux?
i get to dive into the world of UDP and TCP ports tonight
@fresh copper https://linuxexplore.com/how-tos/l2tp-vpn-using-xl2tpd/
I did not know you were here too. I am sure you know why I am asking
Yup lol, to connect me to EVIX.
I am trevor@jantechcs.com
also small world isn't it lol
Yea, for some reason all of yours emails end up in my junk folder. Chris, I, and our friend Mike are working on it. We had no idea Cisco had such a lack of layer 2 tunneling protocols
Neither did I
until now
I have been using DMVPN for my own private exchange using 10.90.100.0/24 and 10.90.110.0/24
When we first made EVIX we were using DMVPN but due to lots of issues we had to switch to something more conventional. Zerotier has a lot of the same features as DMVPN but eliminates many issues and it does not require everyone to be on it so thatβs what we use for inter-hub links and a small number of our members. Unfortunately there are not a huge number of compatible systems
what issues did you have with DMVPN?
With VyOS, it will not let bgp packets go over mgre interfaces so we had to make a separate gre interface and and separate IP address for bgp traffic vs the normal traffic. Then other issues came up that made even this not really work.
oh, damn
We did originally plan for Cisco to be able to join. I guess we did not realize that it canβt always do gretap or OpenVPN
oh, and Cisco can do L2TP
I configured my Cisco router to use a Virtual-PPP interface
Yea, so thatβs we are trying to get L2TP to work because it looks like Cisco supports it
sounds good. Here is the config on my side:
pseudowire-class EVIX
encapsulation l2tpv3
ip local interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
interface Virtual-PPP1
ip address 206.81.104.27 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 2602:FED2:FFF:FFFF::21/64
pseudowire 72.52.82.6 1 pw-class EVIX
Iβll relay that over
My ISP offers me the possibility to get a IP block, should I get one? I mean I am not sure what I can do with it. I can separate my server traffic from other traffic I think.
Like a block of IP addresses or the ability to block incoming traffic by IP?
Block of ip addresses
Yeah, but what can I do with it. I have no idea
@dire hearth is it free to get it?
If you are not sure what to use it for, just dont get it
I would love if I could get more than 1 IP residentially
I have the option for 4 IPs at home, but I don't use it
does a dual AC input PSU from corsair exist? to also allow an UPS to be connected? or would it be fine to only be connected to an UPS?
not from Corsair. I have my pc connected directly to the ups and it works fine.
24/7, doesn't hurt the ups?
hmm, cool
any recommendations about what brand of ups to take?
I got a corsair psu 850watt
unraid as OS
APC is a good brand, just take one that has a higher VA than your power supply Wattage. You can also consider other brands, just search for reviews
VA and Watts are basically the same
hmm k
found APC with 1500 va in my local store for 700β¬, worth it? overkill buy i could add a second server on that ups and or network gear
it mentions a 900watt max load btw
Of course having more power than you need means you can power stuff longer.
You shouldn't overload an ups but a 900W load compared to its 1500 seems a little weird. Maybe that's normal
I need at least a 1000Watt ups XD
you need 20/10
NEIN
from what i can see it's like that till the va are over 5k, then the watt is the same as va value
Here in EU with 230V and all that stuff, the VA are the same as Watts. If i remember correctly you have to multiply the VA x 1 to have the number in Watts that is basically the same value
@hallow nimbus apparently my cheap shitty brand ups cannot handle 1 pc, 2 switches, a nas and 2 routers
Wat
The 1000 watt is for me pc and screens alone XD
So i would need 2 1000 watt upsses
eeee
For networking and server
i got you
PERFECT
a little noisy but it should do the work
you can throw a match into the fuel tank
Lets not
why, winter is close
@hallow nimbus since the generator takes few seconds to start, i'd recommend some batteries to keep things up and running while the generator starts
I need moar
π€
aka i need more
but like WAY WAY more?
It need to be able to keep running for atleast a week
oh, you didn't specified that
Thats starting to look like it yes
you don't pay me enough for this
once you build that shiet
uuuu
one fire and battery room is toast. Bring some bread down there to prepare.
what's better than bread that taste like acid and cancer smoke
But it's aws day 
^
Add pf on that.
that's 1 if i remember correctly
ur a pf
Yea power factor is annoying. It does depend a lot on how you are billed. Most large buildings and industrial buildings are charged more for having a bad power factor (the donβt actually measure the power factor but they do charge as if the power factor was 1 so it looks like they are using more power than they actually use). Most homes these days are charged on their actual power usage. Computers and servers usually donβt change the power factor that much because of the way that the transformer and rectifier work.
There are devices that try to adjust that
It does not matter for homes because power companies usually charge by actual power usage these days so power factor does not matter. In places where it does matter they will put large capacitors in parallel to make the power factor closer to 1 (as most of these places have lots of motors so their power would be more inductive on the reactance scale). If they have a varying power factor then they may use super fancy equipment that automatically adjusts.
There are also cheep Chinese devices that supposedly help. They do often have capacitors in them but without analyzing the power factor yourself you may be making it worse or not helping at all. I also already mentioned that it does not really matter for homes these days.
i've seen a video of a guy testing those chinese things and as i expected they don't work
but like you said, it's pretty useless for home use anyways
We probably saw the same video
Great Scott?
He has great videos
yep
hello there my new network guru friends π
Hey peoplesss, I'm working on a project and either looking for advice or could be a potential job for anyone capable. Basically I'm looking to set up a server that sends tasks to multiple virtual machines to complete. They are different tasks. Basically it is running through a conditional campaign. Any advice and knowledge or resources I should look into are helpful. Thanks! I wasnt sure which thread to put this in so I'm sorry if I picked the wrong one
so you are basically wanting to implement an orchestrator.... whats they hypervisor?
@tropic girder Do you have any more specifics? I would love to help but I am not entirely sure what you need.
I'll look into hypervisors, literally building it from the ground up. @fresh copper Basically my company is looking to build a campaign system for direct messaging for social media websites. Specifically Linkedin right now but eventually would like to expand to offer the service for any social media platforms with direct messaging capabilities. From what I understand it would have its own server and the application would be a computer application not web based really. It would simulate itself like a user would by direct messaging users a message then in a couple of days (or what is specified for that campaign) it would go back and see if there was a response, if so it would skip that person and message someone that the system had sent that same message to but didn't respond. Goal is to start a conversation and then notify the user of the account that they need to respond to a message
We have this service from another company however its half the product we want and each month our servers get slower
I think you pinged the wrong guy my dude π
Yes I did sorryyyy
@sturdy zinc thanks, I'm looking more into hypervisors. That was a term I was looking for
@tropic girder That sounds interesting, Iβll have a look at what would generally work best in that situation
@tropic girder I would go through the AWS route, a not very well known but very very flexible product (orchestrator) you could look into is called Stratoscale, maybe give a look into that product?
@sturdy zinc sweet I will! Thank you sooo much!
@tropic girder not a problem, if you articulate and leverage your infrastructure with the elastic power of a AWS cluster then growing will not be an issue, you will always be covered, you need more capacity boom, presto more capacity, next months things are slow...no problem, you pay only the resources you use
Oh that would be perfect! That's exactly what we need
I haven't messed with AWS yet but heard alot about it
AWS is fun
I'm using Google Cloud platform now
wow. google finally has a second customer
The first being Google...
anyone know how to fix the issue of a Windows xp machine not being assigned a IP address by the network?
Find the Windows Update that disables it. <INSERT "don't use Windows XP" WARNING HERE>
its a system with 733mb of DDR1... so i dont think i can run anything better on it
if i happened to find 4GB of DDR1 laying around i might install windows 10 on it.... but... untill then is stuck on XP
Have you tried resetting the network stack? (Oh Windows XP ... π΅ memoriieeees π΅
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/299357/how-to-reset-tcp-ip-by-using-the-netshell-utility
Explains how to use the NetShell utility to restore the TCP/IP utility to its original state after it becomes damaged. Doing this may fix your Internet connectivity problems.
@sullen patrol run Linux /s
But yea, @inner quiverβs solution should work
tryed it.... its still unable to renew IP address
Did you look for the update that breaks networking in Windows XP?
Look for one of the last updates ever applied to it.
ok if i find a bad update how do i roll back the update? im sorry i dont work with XP machines often
I'm looking for it, but read this https://www.zdnet.com/article/registry-hack-enables-continued-updates-for-windows-xp/
Apparently you can still update Windows XP, even today.
@sullen patrol Google the broken update if you can find it, though I have no idea where it is anymore.
k
@latent stag Get an adblocker
Anyone here able to help with pfSense?
@unkempt ferry I know a bit about pfSense. Whatβs your issue?
@fresh copper do you know if using a dedicated switching chip or a very high-clock intel 8700k chip makes a difference when handling network traffic?
Would the 8700k handle it just as good?
@unkempt ferry I might be able to offer some assistance.
@stuck verge @fresh copper Thank you guys for responding, I actually solved my problem but I do have a few question. Right now I have residential Verizon service. The domain I'm using for the DHCP is verizon.net. What is that domain and can I set it to something different? Also, after a pfsense install, are there anything that I need to set to make sure everything is safe? Thanks!
Bro I don't know this stuff, I'm sorry
What is the search domain and what does it do?
Can I set it to anything I want?
@unkempt ferry search domain is the first thing computer with append to at the end of a DNS lookup. For example, entering web address to server1 will default to server1.verizon.com if you have search domain set to that
Otherwise it has to start appending other ending domain names, like .com, .net
It's just a default setting
That dhcp can provide
What difference does it make if I change it?
Because when I tried to set it to something else, the internet stopped working
Ok, I'll try it again in a bit. Also, I'm setting up a OpenVPN and what is the IPv4 Tunnel Network?
This is from memory, but, it's the subnet of where you want your openvpn clients to reside in
It should be different from your lan subnet
The default was like 10.0.8.0/8 I think
ok so if i'm using 10.20.0.1 to access pfsense, then it should use that scheme or be something completely different?
Just not in same subnet. Anything but 10.20.0.0/whatever mask your using
Otherwise it will have lots of problems routing external traffic to internal network
ok, and server mode is set to remote access, so if i'm in a network that blocks stuff, can I use this remote access vpn to bypass the blocks?
Yes, but I've been at a school where they have DPI and block openvpn as well
Your mileage will vary
Make sure to enable option to use the DNS server of your remote access network and not the blocked network's dns server
Ok well my school allows hotspot shield to work so do they block openvpn?
Openvpn should work then if hotspot shield works
My school is just outright crazy with the protections
Blocking vpn is disgusting
yea it is
I work for my school's it dept and they don't give a shit about security
they gave me admin on my computer login and also gave me local admin for all the computers...
so should I have a IPSec vpn instead?
Yea when I'm traveling and at school
I did not know about obfsproxy
And yes dpi still caught my port changes
Crazy "security" this school has
Use a private OpenVPN over port 80. They can't sniff for that.
Well because my school has wifi as open unencrypted access
@thick minnow
Vpn is a must then
They even say in big letters "THIS NETWORK IS NOT ENCRYPTED USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!"
On the landing page
So you cant go after them
plus the NAC has an application on the device so if it's a school owned device you must connect to their secure WiFi
My school also blocks unknown mac addresses on its switches
I plugged in a laptop to wall outlet
Jt started to work and then
5 seconds later it shut down
But it was working for brief period
The scary part
Hmm
Possibly
Even with 802.1w implementation?
Depends on if portfast edge is enabled or not
@little schooner Dedicated switching is better because of latency. They may preform with similar throughput but the latency will be higher.
@unkempt ferry thatβs the search domain. It does not really matter that much so you can kind of set it to anything.
edge enables portfast but also enables BPDU guard, and one other thing which I'm completely blanking on right now
Yeah edge port is the non Cisco version
Ok cool so I got my VPN to work
I wish they weren't so expensive and didnt need contract for upgrades
Instead I settle with netgear, dlink and some edgeswitches
The edgeswitch is fanless so that was a plus for me
I think only HP doesn't have contracts for code upgrade requirements but most others do as well, not sure on all of them but just from what I've seen
Meanwhile I cant get multicast to work properly on these other switches
Someone non-standard about them
Something*
Any recommendations for a switch?I was looking at a WS-C3750G-48TS-S
Multicast is evil, always
Like Cisco makes it so dead simple
One command and its enabled for vlan
Edgeswitch is a whole crazy set of settings to set
And then you have to fight with config sanitation
@unkempt ferry If you're familiar with Cisco IOS commands then it's a nice switch, a bit on the loud side though
Yes they are loud switches
Oh theres no interface.....
There is an interface, it's pretty poor last I remember
Like you can view the status of ports but full fledged configuration is not going to happen
You might be able to jerry rig something
When you say loud switch like how loud
Like I have a dell r710
Like a Dell2950
Like that server is tolerable.
the r710 isn't that loud
The 600 and 700 series are pretty nice by comparison π
But 2950....
I would say 2x the R620
700 series are def. quiet
Maybe a bit more, hard to say for sure
So a cisco switch is louder than a r710... great
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJ9il5FJYg
Listen at full volume /s
Yea thats pretty loud
If it's for home use and you don't need things like OSPF, BGP, etc. then something like a webgui based TP-Link or similar would be ideal
Is it always that loud or is that just when it boots
Well that's with chassis open
While in WinServ it's ~5k but I keep it off all of the time xddd
@rocky badge omg that is unbearable π
13k fan noise
@thick minnow my teacher once said that he owned a web server hosting moodle and left it up for 10 years straight uptime
Only linux can do a thing he said
moodle, I remember that
moodle reeeeee
@thick minnow you should set your iDRAC un/pw to root calvin
/s

My school's iDRAC says it's the default π
At one point, my school had public IP set on idrac
Anyone could visit and take over
true
OOF
PCS
port 9100 vulnerability
xddd
Best way to defend against all attacks is to shutdown the egress ports on all devices and remove power from said device too
haha
π
HAHAH
They blocked iDRAC
"reason" non-managed
also their blocked page doesn't work
If the firewall randomly crashes is it a bug or security enhancement?
Keep the bad guys guessing as to if it's working or not π
This is true
Have you tried dealing with their 4G business class dept?
ATT: "We promise this feature is enabled and works"
next day
Us: "We tested the feature and it does not work and wasn't enabled"
ATT: "Whoops"
I tried
No
lul
they blocked it yup
can't access it on chrome
They also blocked vSphere
Good boye
So they're actually securing their network a little
I can't shutdown hosts anymore 
So now you can't be expelled π¦
XD
Uh-oh @rocky badge the Google Andministration is after me!
Why
For it is not me who they think do the bad thing
lol
and it was spelt "Andministration" so, ya know, π
Baltimore? So
Cloudflare is the CIA...
welp had a disc die in my netapp π¦
Dang, do you have a replacement drive ready or do you have to get one?
well I had a spare hot in, but now I have to dig one up
saw this posted in #voice-chat-limited Now I've been wondering this for a while now but with asymmetric data speeds is it possible that the upload speed would bottleneck the download speed or vice-versa since tcp connections send acknowledgements for every packet received? Since ethernet has a MTU of 1500 (ignoring jumbo frames) the maximing amount of bytes you could send per packet is 1434 if you take 14 bytes for ethernet and 20 for IP and 32 more for TCP. A simple ACK packet shows up in wireshark as 66 bytes. That would mean the connection would need a downlink/uplink ratio of 22. The example in the image only has a ratio of about 10. If everything I said is actually reasonable and not flawed then that would mean they could only get a TCP connection download of about 100mbps. Is there anything obvious I'm missing here?
Yes, not every sent packet is ack'd
Tcp acks use the in-flight window to ack
So if you have 10000 bytes to send, and you send 2 packets of 1000 bytes, you might get an ack with a last ack'd byte as 2000
I forget the max tcp window size but it is at least 32-64k
Alright that explains thanks! I guess I should've just read up more on how TCP works
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
It is a very complex thing if you get into all the different edge cases. Fascinating though π
I bet
@subtle depot the 1500 MTU does not include L2 headers, so the 18 bytes for Ethernet II (14 at the start and 4 at the end) is not included. That's why you will sometimes hear MSS or Maximum Segment Size as being higher, 1518 for Ethernet II and a but more for VLAN tagged packets. That's why VLAN tagged packets still get 1500 MTU
Yeah so that 1434 number should be closer to 1460
got the wrong number for tcp too
Changes the ratio but not the answer to my question
Thanks anyway
Is this a good idea π€
@subtle depot It can potentially increase speeds by detecting when it can have a larger MTU than 1500 but adds some overhead
This parameter controls TCP Packetization-Layer Path MTU Discovery. The following values may be assigned to the file:
0 Disabled
1 Disabled by default, enabled when an ICMP black hole detected
2 Always enabled, use initial MSS of tcp_base_mss.
It means that once enabled, your OS try to find the MTU between your client and your server using Path MTU discovery mechanism. It probably increase the default MTU (1500 on Linux) in your case, allowing bigger packets to be sent.```
Most end-user modems are 1492-1500MTU.
Anything large can lead to data loss or corruption.
Is there an small enterprise modem capable of doing QOS?
Avaliable in australia for NBN
I think that just about all of them do. If you're looking for something cheep then the EdgeRouter X is nice and very cheep. The unifi security gateway is easier to use but it more expensive. Let me know if you need something more powerful though
ddwrt exists, and has QOS capabilites. 
If you are ok with consumer gear then load up a Linksys WRT3200 or whatever other consumer gear up with ddwrt or OpenWRT
Like Dooley mentioned
Depends on the definition of small enterprise modem, to be honest.
Most of the time I find people who want small enterprise stuff would be fine with consumer stuff loaded with alternate firmware.
If I have 2 Cisco APs(AIR-CAP3602I-A-K9), can I create like a mesh network with them or would it not be a smooth handoff as I move around the house?
Would I need a Wireless Controller?
Ok nevermind, they are controller based, so I would need a controller and thats what I want to avoid
You can do standalone mode with the 3600s but smooth handoff needs a controller
the x800 series like the 2800 and 3800 APs can do local controller mode with one basically running a WLC VM inside the AP and acting as a controller for the rest
So if you can get a 3800 or something then you could have that be a master controller for the 3600s
I see....
So I kinda want to improve my home wifi without really spending too much so pretty much buying used stuff from Ebay. Any recommendations?
You could try UniFi APs and running the controller in a VM
UniFi AP AC Lite, are those good?
This one is like 60 bucks on ebay
Can I run a controller vm for the cisco ones?
Yes but you need a license
and the cost of a license is going to be about the same as a used 2504 WLC last I checked, which will have a RTU license on it
Wow is the 3800 series expensive
Yah, they are still in high demand as the next gen AP has only just started rolling out so it will be a couple years longer at least before the used ones flood the market =/
So since the 3602is are like 12 bucks right now, i might as well get 2 of those and then upgrade in the future when the 3800 are be retired.
So these the 3602i can be used as standalone so I can mesh them but without a smooth transition?
As far as I'm aware, yes
If you're not in a huge hurry I can ask tomorrow at work to make sure since I could be wrong and you'll get smooth transitions but I doubt it
Yep
Oh yea that would be nice
I would appreciate that
Also, what do you do for work?
Network and solution validation
Haven't dabbled with mesh standalone stuff really so I would rather double check with someone who has π
Ok cool, I just started working for my school's IT so I started to learn about this networking stuff and I'm still a noob at a lot of it
Learning is half the fun, breaking things is the other half imo π
lol
The funny thing is my school doesn't give a shit about security, all the student accounts have admin for some stupid reason
*looks at @rocky badge *
Putting the client on a VLAN and not being able to access the router is fun
@clear igloo 
That's a rip
This is a really easy network to draw
The office has the MDF and every hallway has IDFs
Did you have a seizure while trying to use paint?
I was on my phone
I want perfect lines!
Nein
@clear igloo So is there a way to get the virtual controller without a license?
Also, how much is the license anyways
Depends but I've seen them anywhere from $500 to $1000+
Holy shit
So I'm assuming you haven't met Cisco pricing
I'm just a high school student that wants to play around with some aps.
Come on cisco
π
As I said, try looking at UniFi
looks like I have to redirect my domain fuckingyourwallet.net to cisco instead of apple now
I would go with the 3602i APs in mesh and deal with controller stuff later
Well the UniFi software is free but the UniFI APs are more expensive
Well the 3602i APs are 12 bucks on ebay
Plus UniFi is eaiser
Yea that is true
Now if you go to fuckingyourwallet.net
I mean, Cisco is enterprise/business stuff
Apple is more consumers and stuff
Completely different markets as well
Run it on baremetal!
I'm going to assume that the Lite's speeds are way more than enough for YouTube lol
They aren't actually that expensive
If you look at their specs
What should I do for a switch? A UBNT switch as well, thats probably hella expensive
Bruh I know that, I was joking
Anything gigabit poe
Just to finish off the convo earlier, it looks like you can do seamless with mesh on standalone on the 3602i AP
@clear igloo Ughhh decisions decisions....
I'm going to assume UniFi Lites are def able to do mesh
I was looking at this switch
That's called wireless handoff/roaming
Cisco but 48 PoE ports at 170$
I need to brush up on my wireless stuff again but for now, homework x.x
Are there UniFi Switches that can be used with my UniFi APs and my other server stuff that won't fuck my wallet
Even the 24 port PoE is 400$!!
I'm in high school right now earning 17$ a day from working at IT....
You don't have to get UniFi switches, sometimes edgeswitches are cheaper and they have the new UniFi look
UniFi vs EdgeSwitch
Wow the edge swiches are a lot better
When the EdgeSwitch and UniFi Switch are literally the same thing but a different casing... π€
No, the edgeswitch is better. Has a decent cli vs the Unifi switch
I much prefer the edgeswitch stuff but if you donβt want to tinker and want something that just works then you would go with the unifi
@fresh copper Is it true that edgerouter does not have a proper ip helper-address command functionality?
They only have dhcp relay-agent
which is NOT the same
That is my current gripe about it right now.
@little schooner what exactly do you mean by ip helper-address? Is that some Cisco thing?
@fresh copper yeah it is
I need its functionality on edgerouter on order to let broadcast traffic travel past router port
But only for specific broadcast traffic.
And unfortunately edgerouter is limited in this regard
What do you want to do that requires broadcast traffic to travel beyond a single L2 domain?
@fresh copper pxeboot
the server is located on a different lan
and I need the broadcast dhcp discover packet to traverse to router + the pxeboot server
dhcp discover will hand the IP address but not the boot-server or boot file
pxeboot server will provide the rest of the details
and it will successfully boot
other solution is to merge lans or have a interface in each vlan I want to pxeboot with
that would mean a lot of ip addresses to keep track of
That makes sense. I donβt really know how pxe works so I canβt exactly say how to do it. Sometimes if you canβt figure out how to do something in EdgeOS you can look it up for VyOS or Vyatta as the CLIs are almost the same
hmm good point
How does it actually work without the cloud key? is it the same software (interface) if you use the pc as a key?
I used ubnt at work, for first time, love it, but getting the key is expensive for home use.
You can have a raspberry pi for the controller
A windows pc
Literally anywhere
No reason to buy the key if you're a techie
Yea I've seen it showing up in the unraid container list even
So it's just the same as a key?
just not always online
possible
Imagine the cloud key as a raspberry pi runnning a small linux distro
that's what the cloud key is
if you have a RPi it's literally the exact same thing as the cloud key, the only difference being that the key is PoE powered, while you have to power the RPi with a micro usb cable
i have my controller in a cloud VPS π
i'm paying 5$/month for 4 cores, 4 gigs of RAM and unlimited traffic at ~ 200mbps both ways
I host my controller in a ubuntu 16 vm. It's already hosting other services so why not serve double duty
Any low power device can handle it but just make sure to meet the mini requirements
Well if they're a paying customer you should probably make the required backups and not ask them to. A backup machine would be nice or at least notify them of an upgrade/maintenance window if it will be done within a few hours. (preferably outside of business hours lol)
I've a problem with the network on my pc when i use it as hackintosh. When i've not install drivers and clover with multibeast, internet works. But when i've install drivers with multibeast and i restart my pc, internet doesn't work. If you can help me pls mention me . Thx for help :)
π
Yknow it's cold outside when the cat sits on the warm router
pfsense because of customization and package support, UBNT for simplicity
and ubnt has one of the best gui interfaces to work with it
Agree with the above.
@unkempt ferry I would go with pfSense. The USG is not great for people who want to tinker. Itβs meant to be very simple but is somewhat lacking in features
I use OpnSense... Basically pfSense but opensource
OpenSense is nice unless you want to do IPSec
IPSec is not very good on OpenSense
Other than that it is nice and I have used it myself
Yeah, I don't use IPSec
expect it says that pfSense is opensource
How good is USG with dual wan?
Does anyone Know if I can upgrade the firmware of the management card in my 2950R2? π€π€
wait, why cant i use both those 4 eth ports and the 4 sfp ports? What's the purpose of that
well its to give you media options, I am guessing they are only 1gig sfp ports right?
@reef valve I just saw your pic from yesterday with the Unifi. Nice toys you got. I love their equipment. They will literally never break.
Sure hope so:)
Flashing a RPI just now to use it as a openvpn server/unifi controller
IPv6 is just a fad
XD
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT bitch what
"My vendor doesn't support it"
IPv6 is a security risk
xddd
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6
Then that's a shitty DDOS mitigation platform
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC
We don't have a lab to test it
xddd
I'm done What's IPv6?
I love IPv6
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6
transit provider is a link to that form XD
Some people donβt like HE
Also the whole thing where HE and Cogent donβt peer so if you only get one then you miss out some IPv6 routes
Android actually does not support DHCPv6 but everyone should be using stateless auto configuration for IPv6 anyway
Even Cisco supports it
Why rfc6598 when you can IPv6....
Even extreme networks supports it π
ewwwwwww
pls no
@clear igloo @fresh copper https://linusdrop.tips/InbornNaturalCorydorascatfish
I have to leave IPv6 support enabled in order to have WMI working on server 2016
I'm not getting a public IPv6 
If I disable it, no more ps-remoting
Didnt work for me
Hmm
Once I turned it on and added listener on ipv6
It started to work
Very weird
What was more weird is that I connect to them via IPv4 address anyway
And still error without a listener on ipv6 *
I should configure IPv6 on my firewall too, been lazy too π
Linus should do a video on downloading big games via Mobile data network. 
Like with this bundle maybe 
I dont think edgerouter supports firewall filtering on interfaces
does it?
There is no need to add it unless you really are accessing ipv6 addresses out on the internet
@broken cosmos so like a rant video in a way how different providers have different high speed data caps?
So, it is possible to do it though?
Also, you can't filter by DNS names in edgerouter... something that other routers are capable of doing
why not : (
That would of made so many things much easier to block
instead of having blacklists, just use a whitelisted dynamic dns name
to allow in and auto block the rest
the edgerouter struggle
@little schooner The Edgerouter does support firewall on whatever interface you want and can do a lot of quite complicated rules. It's true that id does not support the kind of DNS thing that you want by default but the specific thing that you want is possible via a script. If you go in the cli and type sudo su you get what is very close to a normal linux cli so you could write a script and set it to run periodically.
It's not optimal though
That's why I only use my ERX for my main wan and use a virtualized router for all of my internal routing
One of my projects is mounting a network share on an ERX and then using it to add some virtual memory so that it can handle the full IPv6 tables. It's a bad idea but will be fun to try
Guys my brand new router is not responding
I setted it up and then i wanted to add some wifi extenders to have full coverage of 5ghz signal (tp link wifi extender+) i setted it up and then suddenly router stopped sharing both 2.4 and 5ghz wifi
The power light was blinking
We are talking about linksys wrt 1900ac
I cheked the ethernet cable to the router and it was giving signal i tried to unplug it and wait and nothing happened
Ok
What a tiny rack
lol weird
lol that is really small
on the forum they say that the AC HD is more about high density situations. not coverage
i know that but how many hds will i need to cover 3000sqft vs how many LRs i need
The UAP-LR is around 120m of radius btw
i know the range isn't the same as the advertisement. It's like when they advertise a "theoredical speed of.."
i'm just reading the specs
why not ubiquiti stuff?
so you would go cisco or any other brand?
whats the connection speed?
lol
test it with those super fast 100gbps machines
uuuu
LOL
that speed test screen is running in 8k
Guys
Woman
did you just assume my gender
I had an issue with the database on the unifi controller so i fixed it temporarily and messaged ubiquiti about it
I just wanted to share my experience with the "technician"
cause it's fucking hilarious
listen to him @hallow nimbus
Yeah
ofc
The issue i'm having is i couldn't export settings
So i did the mongodb fix thingy
and i couldnt restart the service as /usr/lib/unifi/data/db was owned by root
for some reason
π
I changed permissions to unifi and it ran
but the guy has no clue what i'm talking about
@hallow nimbus is
have you actually met anyone in you're life that's a "d'link dude"
whoa
that's a whole new level of being hipster
π
YOU SEE
aww you do
Xd
so ubiquiti guy is still gone
still hasn't replied
wolololol
wow no caps huh
feelsnocapsman
oi
someone translate this please
hes gone
My ISP didn't know what Ubiquiti networks was, well at least network support π
nah man i disagree
The AP coverage i got from my setup is out of this world
Meh
Haven't had an issue so far
The issue i have right now is probably a consequence of me running everything as sudo su
why wouldn't i su
but you can sudo su
did he find this on google?
He prob did @reef valve
i don't remember, i didnt turn it on in months.
he probably has
this one?
bigger?
he has no fucking clue
XD
omegalul
you are the support center's most feared person. The one that has a super complicated problem they cant solve
XD
the roast to support centers
My RIPE ATLAS probe shipped. Also they are sending three even though I only applied for 1





