#cars
1 messages · Page 303 of 1
nice
whoa is that an FB
It's a dorito
Audi suspends e-tron electric SUV production due to supply problems, batteries are suspected https://t.co/4ytYoCjQu5 by @fredericlambert
379
Also to stir up old shit, this video was made by Tesla in May of 2019 according to the file's creation date:
Almost a year old at this point. Imagine what their current dev releases can do.
Siccck, I can't view the vid
Same
I don't get why you need autopilot around town
^what people said about the telephone 30 years ago
https://www.ad.nl/politiek/oud-minister-plasterk-noemt-rijders-van-elektrische-auto-s-enorme-asocialen~aa467938/ (Google Translate) 
@fair bronze Omega 
https://youtu.be/j264iSMCQ_o
They're going to convert it to a pickup next episode tho 
After buying a car at auction for £500, Alex takes us for a detailed look at what makes it - without exception - the most disgusting car he's ever owned!
SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/CTSubscribe
Thanks to Limitless Detailing
https://www.instagram.com/limitlessdetailinguk/?hl=en
...
Yeah I've seen it
Kinda sad tbh
30 hours of cleaning the thing, then saying that it's going to be hacked
@eager kite Any sort of automatic transportation is no where near. There are far too many legal issues for it to happen.
Computers are great for stuff that always stays the same. But they are crap in any kind of "What if"-scenario.
And if you use the current 'Autopilot', then you are still legally required to keep watch of the car for those 'what if' moments.
Far too many people just let go of the wheel and say "Car's driving itself! I don't need to pay attention!"
Always watching for that 'what if' is often more exhausting than driving yourself.
Holy shit that minister literally has brain damage
@civic spoke did you watch the video?
literally is automatically driving right there under dev software
and that's year old dev software
Watching some racing and knowing the defence force here has a race/burnout team had to check it out and wow
You heard right - this Ford LTD is STILL owned by the Australian Defense and it rips some MAD skids mate! We headed down under to Summernats 30 for the world’s biggest burnout (skid) competition and ran into this big boat of a car! We couldn’t believe our eyes when we saw it h...
training mechanics work on them
Mmmm great car
Yeah it's awesome
High quality interior and high quality (fun) driving experience 
Hell yeah brother
And prestigious. 👀
ye
Most engaging EV ever 
^^^
And they did some very extensive tests to make sure it drives like a real Porsche :Pogey: (Spotted the car before it was announced :))
POG
if only the range was better
The question is - Is the range not enough for 99% of the people and their use case?
They say what? 200 miles?
200ish miles but it very handily beats it
Think I read someone got 300 out of it
Unlike Tesla that literally never can make the EPA estimate unless you drive with the heater off and 40mph
I like how EPA range is 192 miles for the Turbo S. But WLTP says "Nah. Here, have another 25-30% of range"
I with AC on, at 75-80 mph with a full load of passengers and full trunk and shit on the roof rack and still get 450 miles a tank in the X5 @indigo coral
😂
Wow
Its honestly great lmao
You buy a Porsche for the way it handles
We all know that Range Rover's are the most reliable cars
Range Rovers are awesome, I'd totally get one if it was even decently reliable
but unfortunately its a nightmare
Yeah, good cars, but dont buy them lol
Leasing them isn't a bad idea if you are fine with switching cars every couple of years
Yup, same with most BMW's
My family has been leasing BMW's for several years now, we bought 1 and regret it lol
Really? We've had a BMW X5 2012 and it started giving problems after 3-4 years
Its barely running right now
Idea is a car lasts longer than 3-4 years.
I'm a fan of ownership tbh.
Same.
Same
Buy owning new-ish cars are expensive.
Friend of mine has a 2005 X3, constant problems
I did hear the rant Linus had about it.
It depends on what you are buying.
A lot of newer cars on the market are a better deal new than used considering the prices of used.
The main part what you are paying for when you are buying new is peace of mind.
Warranty, bonuses, and being first.
Just take care of the maintenance lol
Thing is - When you lease, or buy new. Then you usually have the dealer take care of all of that.
When your car is over 10 years old. Then it's all on you.
Anyway. In my case I could buy brand new for 23k or buy used for 20k.
10,000 miles, warranty issues, no free services... new was a no brainer for me.
A new Fiesta ST is tempting.
It was worth the step up to get what I wanted.
Buying new is unaffordable here 
Small and dated for my liking.
Focus ST would have been nice, but also kinda dated by the time I was buying... also premium fuel is a no no.
Fiesta... yeah not a huge fan of the tiny engine.
Focus is still a 4 banger tho... but 2 door fiesta

Ah wow misread Focus
Because GlassBomb said Fiesta xD
But yeah, we have a new Focus ST as well
Then again I'm not a huge fan of modern Ford styling.
A 2 door Corolla hatchback would be sweet.
Probably have to import it since they are sold in my country :/
We had 3 door Corollas 10 years ago 
yeah, but the new one is begging for a coupe version.
But 3 door C-segment are as good as extinct 
Yeah, but the 3rd door is a mini door.
I'd probably buy an EV before anything else right now.
The Honda E is such a good looker
Oof 
too bad the Focus RS didn't come with an auto
I wouldn't mind that, but I've heard it's a bit boring to drive.
Also interior quality isn't quite as nice as Honda or Toyota.
Luckily the Focus RS didn't come with an auto
Ftfy ^^
i30 N drives nice 
The Honda E is RWD 👀
Yes it is 
And has a tiny turning circle
Don't have to limit the travel of the wheels as much.
It is super short as well.
Turning radius of some FF cars are just horrid
Hate the mirros tho
More or less the size of the Jazz/Fit
my car turning radius is bloody gigantic
Also doesn't have an engine up front so I imagine the wheels have more turn in them.
My Corolla is alright.
Mines truly terrible
Never had an issue with the turning radius on mine
Also about 1000 pounds heavier.
The turning radius of my car ain't bad. FR layout.
Wait 21ft is 6.4m? That's not much?
That's good. Tbh
Wait is the US measurement maybe different from the EU measurement?
Turn wheel to lock, and turn till you are back to where you started?
Well idk, falcon says 21ft but if I check it here it says 12.2m = 40ft. Probably get the same for your Corolla
I think that my turning diameter is just above 10 meters
10.4m == 34ft for a Corolla hatchback
Yes
Yes
Cause MK's figures are all about 2x what Falcon and I are saying.
Fairly useless metric in the US at any rate.
That's why I asked Wait is the US measurement maybe different from the EU measurement? 😝
🤔 strange
Well idk
10.4/10.5 is what I find for my car.
But yours is RWD 
https://i.redd.it/5c9j87dbcli41.jpg oh man that red is a good look.
mine's big enough that I struggle to park
almost always have to 3 point in
and out
not large enough for semis
Well nearly
Went to go pick her up. She lasted about 20miles. Imma assume bad fuel.
quite possibly
been sitting for a year and a half
Yea
probs varnished gas
drain and clean the tank, replace your fuel filter, and pray that the pump is still good and that the lines aren't clogged
looks sick tho, I love those popup Hondas
welp rn its at the shop. we will see what he has to say. he worked on my old prelude and on these older hondas for 30 years now.
Introducing the Lotus Evija! It's a British all-electric hypercar powered by a 2,000kW lithium-ion battery! It's got a ridiculous power output of 2,000hp and an equally eye-watering 1,700Nm of torque! This means it can go from 0-60mph in just 3 seconds, before hitting a top sp...
Finally an EV that is better than the 2012 Model S in all categories
Only costs 2 mil euro lol
Ah yes. A British boutique car known for being quirky despite having used Toyota engines for the last 20 years.
Perhaps their EVs are less quirky, but then again the British doing EVs is as appealing as toasting bread near an open body of water.
Finally got around to stripping the failed paint job from these covers.
Gonna paint again, and this time just silver by itself. No coloring.
For reference.
Pretty sure, almost certain.
The heatshield on the left there is NOT painted.
It wasn't painted in my car at any rate.
Oh no, I had gotten these from the junk yard, cleaned and painted them.
I didn’t get a good spray on them though, and decided to not do color again.
Some time next week, or next month, I’ll paint them again, but just in silver.
These ones are in better condition than the ones on my car (less rust n corrosion)
V-Tec 
https://www.facebook.com/332145270132218/posts/3863957556950954/
Tesla owners taking their Tesla on vacation 

Damn so many Teslas at this one too
Yeah but at least they won't wait 15hr to get a pump
You're right, sometimes it's days

Never seen that in my life

Ah gas lines as aftermath of hurricane Sandy
Not really comparable
Gasoline supplies have been disrupted by everything from traffic jams to shuttered ports and power outages caused by the storm that carved a deadly swath through the region on Monday.
Most major gas station chains, from ExxonMobil (XOM) to Hess (HES), are experiencing disruptions. There are also pedestrians toting gas cans waiting for their turn at the pump so they can power their home generators.
Hmmm with power outages, I don't think you can recharge your Tesla as well
Thankfully many Tesla sites are installing battery storage systems and solar panels to produce local power supply
Also has happened many other times besides natural disasters
Supply chains fail for gas all the time, usually it isn't large enough to effect a large area
Supply for electricity is much more stable in comparison, and can be augmented at the home level (something not possible with gas).
so the conclusion is; gas bad most of the time?
bad all the time
if electricity is down you have bigger problems than charging your car
but people have gas powered backup generators if they need that electricity
like on farms and stuff
And hospitals etc
and gas cars still win for sound
We're talking about a grid failure
as that's basically the only thing that will be taking out Tesla superchargers
Nah we were actually talking about a line for hours at superchargers 
You may have a generator for your house and enough fuel to run for a day or two
most people don't
those lines are a WIP problem
@stoic ledge useless to hyperfocus on
for a long time they will be
🤔
Long station lines are very common every travel season, regardless of gas or EV
Went on vacation even the busiest day of the year.... literally never had an issue
Maybe one car in line
nice anecdote
i’m still all for gas until the Tesla semi is done being tested and touched up on
you drive a semi around?
will do soon
talk about efficiency...
Tesla semi is not gonna be cheap...
ik
i just want elon to prove it’s possible and better than huge big fat turbo diesels
which i do love
I mean they have the prototypes driving around rn and pulling loads
no megachargers installed yet tho
Probably for the better imo
i’m still excited about it tbh
what company was it that ordered like 250 of them after the reveal?
anticipation is killing me
They probably will field them for a period and make sure they are more economical than running diesel, then put larger orders
I bet the production version will have a lot better stats than what was presented at its launch
and being in the uk like i am we’ll get then much later as they’re only tested in the states
The infrastructure is so not ready for such power draw tho 
Don't get me wrong, I'm not against EVs. But the infrastructure isn't evolving at the same rate
mfw never been stuck in line for gas cause I don't get gas at Costco
you’re not ready for such power draw
you’re not ready for such power draw
You changed my mind, thnx


Power requirements to refine and transport diesel will be phased out with the addition of EV semis though, it's not a one way street when talking about energy requirements
(and obv to get the crude oil in the first place)
And you can't have lines for superchargers if they don't exist
Not even the chargers on campus are Tesla superchargers. They're just regular 240v
Our campus doesn't even have charger of any kind 
I can't imagine what the lines are at non-Tesla charging stations during holidays when trying to travel in a non-Tesla EV
Non-existent
Cause who the fuck travels in an EV
new all electrical corsa, 200 miles
press F to pay respects to any E-Tron, I-Pace, Taycan, (future) ID.3, Niro, Bolt, Leaf, E-Golf, and i3 owners out there trying to travel on holidays
Perfectly fine for the price and type of car
Niro basically has the same range as a Model 3 LR

80% of the cars you just listed will never be taken on road trips
basically if you’re buying EV buy a tesla
False
False
yea cause most of those are either super expensive work cars or shitty city cars for the middle class
@eager kite what's your car? What do you drive?
If I was buying an EV, it most definitely would not be a Tesla
You never posted anything about it
Recently got a Model 3, and no I don't post much about it cause no reason to
🤔
I actually like to take delivery of my car in 1 piece
Also I don't like to get a text message on the day before delivery, being unsure about the date until then 
if you want an EV city car to drive around town in, you don't need a Tesla
I also don't like it when my car texts me saying it's broken
if you want a cool car that you can actually go places in and has cutting edge things like FSD, then you get a Tesla
If I want a cool car that can go places: RX-7
And technically, it is cutting edge
rotary. very reliable yes.

not people killers
OOF best argument
Right
gotta slip a meme in once and a while
Also the "reliability" argument
"Once in a while"
You can't say rotaries are unreliable if you've never had one
they’re notorious for lasting the least amount of time
true
@dusty warren
Rotaries have a shorter service life, yes. But that don't mean you can't go 200k on one
Imagine being such an alpha company that you push an entire country into recession
Lmao
imagine being pushed into recession by a guy who made “The Boring Company”
couldn't be me
Because a company putting an entire country's economy down is a good thing
oh it's not a good thing
it’s germany, fuck em
It's sad that it's come to this
2 world wars they can start making new better cars to bring them back
If only German auto companies had started work on actual EVs when Tesla did instead of ignoring it and waiting close to a decade before scrambling to try and respond
Yea, I'm sure that's the reason
Well this escalated lol
Makes perfect sense what the fuck is this logic
not sure what else it would be
their sales are tanking, they're needing to cut millions of employees to stay profitable....
Shoutout to the germans in this discord, you cool
That's some very narrow thinking right therr
I mean ofc there are other factors in play
all i’m saying is they’ll be fine they’ve gone through 2 world wars when their economy was much worse than this
but Tesla is having a noticeable impact in their domestic and global sales
You know how much shit affects an economy? The automotive industry would have to completely disappear overnight to have a noticeable effect
uuuh
not for germany
At least on a large scale
if the automotive industry disappeared Germany would collapse
Not necessarily
The vast majority of its economy is dependent upon their auto industry
I somehow doubt that
I could see "large portion", but I don't see their entire economy being supported by it
I mean, German cars aren't cheap. If they were truly that reliant on global sales, they wouldn't have been in good economic standing for a while
Vast majority is a vast lie
Tesla Model 3 registrations in 🇳🇱 
Lmao
Let's hope Germany's economy doesn't collapse
Would cause a whole lot of other problems

But I bet Mr. NF "It’s germany, fuck em" Cloud would love to see millions of people in misery


There's 16 Tesla superchargers across my entire state
Good luck
Traveling through
I've never had to wait in a long line for gas
Maybe like... 5 cars at costco
But that's cause they've got extra cheap gas
I can't remember a time I had to wait at all at a gasstation
5% of Germany's GDP comes directly from the auto industry. Much more of its service industry is dependent upon that 5%. (the service industry is 65% of Germany's GDP).
You only need a small dip in the country's GDP to start a chain reaction, causing on the low end a recession, and at the high end a full scale depression.
Plus, it takes 5 minutes to put gas in a car, not 2 hours to charge.
idk where this 2 hour number comes from...
Even 30 minutes
I mean
Still at least 6 cars could’ve filled up in that time
Let's stick to talking about cars instead of hoping for a country's downfall @eager kite
16 supercharger locations means it's probably pretty easy to get through
The EV chargers on campus have a 4 hour parking limit for a reason lmao
considering those are likely all on interstates
Like, those chargers are probably clustered within 3 or 4 major cities. No small cities or even stops along major highways will have them
which state are we talking about? @civic girder
Ohio
Also talking about german car manufacturers; I doubt that they will fall
they are a bit late to the party, but they did survive the 2008 crisis without a bail out
something you can't claim of the US car manufacturies
Tru
However just betting on EV cars for the future is also idiotic
Batteries ain't cheap or environment friendly
Admit that charging infrastructure is horribly inefficient and insufficient for even the demands we've got now. It's got decades to go before it's adequate enough for a majority share of EV owners
@eager kite
Quite a few locations in Ohio, some around cities and others around the interstates
shouldn't be too hard to cross in a Tesla
Inefficient?
I think you just mean insufficient
no, it's not efficient to have people waiting an hour to then plugin and wait an hour
I don't mean efficient on electricity, I mean time efficient
that's rare
Not really
yea really
literally only happens at certain locations on things like holidays
And usually Tesla responds to these things by adding more chargers in these areas, which is why you see groupings of them in cities where usually this happens
Also they have these mobile charger trailers that they've been testing out in California that seem to be working pretty well
I definitely agree that the network is insufficient for the continued growth of EVs
Too bad that Tesla cars ain't of the quality they claim to be
I love the bait comments like that
Ain't bait
it's bait
Ain't bait, it's truth
deflect the current conversation to try and pick at something else
frame it in a baity way
cmon man
Been on the internet for more than a day
I had no part in chargers distance and wait times discussion
?
oh I get what you were trying to say
doesn't really matter if you were in that convo
It does, at least for a part
It's nice that Tesla is installing super chargers and such
but those have also their downside(s)
However Tesla has two bigger downsides
their build quality ain't great
and they are promoting EV Vehicles as the end all solution of vehicle polution
I mean, build quality can always improve for any company. Tesla's is certainly better than Ford and GM though lol. It's not the best in the industry, but better than average imo
and yes, EV's are the best solution for personal vehicle pollution to date.
Never heard of hydrogen cars? never heard what it takes to make a battery?
never heard of how terribly inefficient hydrogen cars are?
Also yes, it's well known that US build cars are shit, this includes Tesla
Hydrogen will be good for shipping
Only a bit less inefficient a EV car
Bwah Hydrogen is kinda inefficient to make
Hydrogen is super inefficient
if you take 4 year old technology yes
Still doesn't mean I don't see a future in it
barely better than ICEV over the entire cycle
no, modern hydrogen fuel cell cars
also, most hydrogen comes from natural gas
Just run ICEV on hydrogen 
which still produces tons of CO2 in the formation process
so not clean, not cheap, not efficient
Not necessarily
basically shit
It can be 100% green
Hell they are researching the shit out for making it 100% green
yea it can, but it won't and even if it was you could power 2 EVs with the same amount of green energy than 1 hydrogen car
Hydrogen will be used for long term storage applications like on freight ships
Build enough nuclear power plants and even that won't be an issue
not much else
Planes, trucks, cars, trains, etc. will all be EVs because they are just more efficient than hydrogen
Planes?
yes planes
Do you know how heavy batteries are?
Hydrogen is way lighter
oh yea the hydrogen is lighter
but
ever weighed a compressed hydrogen tank?
those boys are thicc
literally, the walls on those tanks are very very thick
and if you go the cryogenic route lol, try packing enough insulation into an aircraft to not cover the entire plane in ice and freeze all the passengers and keep it light
You know that planes tend to cruise at altitudes at heights where everything is freezing
The nice thing about aviation fuel and batteries is that they don't really care what shape their storage tanks are
compressed/cryogenic fuels do
A gas fuel tank is much lighter than a battery with the same capacity
So isolation is the last thing to worry about
A hyrdogen gas tank*
Look dude, isolation is the last thing you have to worry about
you know the space shuttle external tank was lined with a foot of insulation right?
you know why?
because you have to worry about insulation when talking about -252 C fuels
Current aircraft basically use the skin of the wings as part of the tanks
this helps them save weight and increase the volume they can store fuel in
you absolutely cannot do this with cryogenic hydrogen
you would build up a massive layer of ice on the surface of the wings making them not useful at producing lift, you know, their entire point of existence
and, you would heat up your cryogenic fuel turning it into a very flammable gas that has an invisible flame
density of hydrogen as a liquid is ~1000x more than when in a gas phase
thinking that airfuel just sits in a wing
Wtf kind of car is this
without any other protection
there isn't lmao
i come into the cars chat and ya’ll talking about fuel for aircraft
do you know anything about aircraft???
Ever wonder what the red/black lines are on the tops of aircraft wings?
it's literally there to show ground crew where the fuel tanks are
and where ice buildup is most likely to occur due to cold fuel
like bruh
I know that wings are not just full of fuel. Sure, they have fuel tanks inside, but they don't take up all that much space
Mister Aeriel wants to tell me it's not like that
That Fuel just freely flows in the wing
You still need space for structural support, and control surfaces
I can understand his point though
If wings were fuel tanks, we'd be using black magic to fly
Kersosine doesn't need the amount of protection hydrogen needs
all modern aircraft use integral fuel tanks as it decreases the dry mass of the aircraft, thus reducing fuel usage and therefor fuel costs to airlines
But still doesn't mean that hydrogen is not acceptable for use in aircrafts
hell it's better than those way heavier batteries
true
again, please explain how you will fit thicc af tanks into the aircraft without making it unflyable, or please explain to me how you will install a cryogenic system into the aircraft without needing a massive amount of insulation
its a tradeoff
Works on my machine
- you don't need crazy amounts of isolations
no, the wet mass is lower than if it didn't have integral fuel tanks
because the dry mass of the aircraft is lower, you can have smaller tanks
which in it of itself has weight savings
bruh
our old buddy calculus tells you where the suite spot is
removing dry mass to add wet mass
if you keep the same wing size sure
the net weight is going to be roughly the same, you just end up with more fuel
but you don't need to
what?
ok, let me explain this more simply
lets say I have an older aircraft with a light alloy tank, and it can fly 5000 miles
Also Aerial you seem to be consfusing Compressed hydrogen with Liquid hydrogen
yea, I was gonna say
if I replace the wings with integral fuel tank wings and keep them the same size, then the plane (due to having a lower dry weight) will be able to fly farther
say, 6000 miles
or, I could make the wings smaller, coming back to the original tank volume but still having less dry mass
Wouldn't fuel be heavier?
if you changed the wing size on an existing aircraft you'd fuck it up
so then I still only have 5000 miles of range but I burn less fuel
yes you would have more fuel which is heavier, but the more fuel can propel you a lot further @night current
planes have tighter tolerances than cars do, lmao
for rockets this is part of the rocket equation
yes ofc this example isn't actually possible to an existing plane, we're talking about why manufacturers went to integral fuel tanks
it saves them and the airlines money
because it's more efficient
@round turtle yea, he is. If all hydrogen systems were liquid, we couldn't have hydrogen fuel cell cars and Mazda couldn't have run a rotary engine on hydrogen gas
@round turtle no I didn't confuse compressed hydrogen and liquid hydrogen. I mentioned both separately and explained the challenges of doing either one of them.
dry weight is cheaper
Dude you just went on a rant how much isloation is needed
yes, for liquid hydrogen
with space shuttle and everything
the airlines want to save money sure, but the manufacturers don't give two shits about the airlines. Airlines are gonna buy the planes anyways
You didn't gave me space to talk about anything
space shuttle used liquid hydrogen
the airlines want to save money sure, but the manufacturers don't give two shits about the airlines. Airlines are gonna buy the planes anyways
you just went straight to liquid hydrogen
^
bruh we're in a text channel nothing is stopping you from typing lmao
and complaining about isolation
I like to follow the story of someone
Because otherwise we both just get confused
@civic girder ah yes that totally is the case, not like manufacturers can go bankrupt from making shitty planes or anything
if the planes are actually shitty, sure
@round turtle ok well I'm pretty sure I separated both pretty well, compressed hydrogen and liquid hydrogen both have their flaws, one is a cryogenic and one isn't
If Boeing and Airbus just worked together they coudl fuck over the industry
however that is really non car subject
but if the only thing "wrong" with them is higher fuel costs, that's no reason for the manufacturers to go bankrupt
except many national and international laws forbid them to do so
hydrogen is dumb for cars, honestly
@civic girder if one is a higher fuel cost, the airlines will not buy that one and will go for the other's planes
especially on large scale
I doubt that EV only cars is good for the planet
because of the shit we need in batteries
@eager kite not necessarily. If the higher fuel cost plane can still fly farther, travel at higher speed, or carry more passengers, it'll still get bought.
you can readily make it from zapping water or steam reforming natural gas
but one uses a fuck ton more energy and the other produces a large amount of greenhouse gasses and uses a fuckton of energy
Hydrogen is the most found molecule in the world, it's way more common then lithium
bruh not hydrogen pairs that you need
ofc hydrogen is found everywhere because water is found everywhere
problem is you need to make hydrogen gas to do anything useful with it
getting enough hydrogen to power a car costs a lot
Let's restate it; we can just produce hydrogen
waaay more than electricity
we can't produce just lithium
yes, and use a fuck ton of energy
again there have been some huge strides in making hydrogen more efficiently
bruh we have multiple times over the amount of lithium to replace all cars on the road today with EVs
supply is not an issue
cost is atm
LPG still cheaper than EV 
runs
thankfully, cost is going down
Like, even if you were to make a self sustainment system for a car to generate its own Hydrogen, the energy requirement and production wouldn't be enough to keep the car running
lol @stoic ledge
But then EV cars should be able to make their own electricty etc if you come with that argument
yes, hydrogen fuel cells are pretty efficient
the problem is making hydrogen in the first place
^
compressing and transporting is easy
no not really
yes
takes a significant chunk of energy to compress hydrogen
it's making enough to provide fuel for a car
you can basically use the current network of gas/diesel
or to compress any gas really
sure it costs energy
but the same goes for getting the elctricity to the charging station
Currently, hydrogen is typically compressed by a reciprocal compressor. At the flow
rates and pressures for 1,000 kg/day hydrogen refueling stations, these compressors can
achieve an isentropic efficiency of about 56% and a motor efficiency of 92% [5]. Using
these values, the H2A Delivery Scenario Model (HDSAM) projects a refueling station
compression energy efficiency of 52% to fill 350 and 49% for 700 bar vehicles.
52% to 49% efficient....
Yeah roughly 50%
very efficient....
That's been known for hydrogen
I never said it was efficient
I just said it was easy
and the energy cost for compressing hydrogen is also far lower than the actual production of the hydrogen
We can even transport it to homes over the existing natural gas lines 
^
yes but natural gas molecules are a lot larger than H2 molecules
still it ain't a problem
if hydrogen leaks that easily, than hydrogen cars are not feasible
even though hydrogen cars are feasible
(despite the hydrogen supply problem)
I live in a country where natural gas is the main fuel for cooking and heating
The main thing is, we just need more ethanol fuel
independent experts and the natural gas companies stated that switching to hydrogen would be easy
"easy"
when looking at current infrastructure
> I live in a country where natural gas is the main fuel for cooking and heating
Willem county? 
Yep 😛
Nice 🤜
🤛
casually researching converting to e85 on a carbureted engine
hydrogen cars don't leak much because they have been designed to hold high pressure hydrogen gas in them
Transporting gaseous hydrogen via existing pipelines is a low-cost option for delivering large volumes of hydrogen. The high initial capital costs of new pipeline construction constitute a major barrier to expanding hydrogen pipeline delivery infrastructure. Research today therefore focuses on overcoming technical concerns related to pipeline transmission, including:```

hell it's so easy that there are companies offering hydrogen manufacturing stations at homes, using internal gas pipes, if you really don't want to switch to induction cooking or less than great heating solutions
"The high initial capital costs of new pipeline construction constitute a major barrier to expanding hydrogen pipeline delivery infrastructure."
basically, replacing all seals on existing piping so it can be rated for hydrogen
🤔 It seems like I could fairly easily convert my RX-7 to E85
the same goes to expending natural gas pipelines
also
that's cause the US doesn't care
2.3% of natural gas produced each year gets leaked
in the USA
we could fix that if we wanted to
this can only go higher if you move to an even harder to contain gas like hydrogen
but you really think states are going to bother spending that much money
if this happened in the Netherlands, Groningen would have bene more pissed off than they already are
oh yea but they aren't going to fix it
Side note: that thing is sexy
just like how they aren't going to switch to hydrogen
because it's not economical to do so
Genesis is sexy 
That wagon looks amazing
what car is that?
But a Genesis G70 wagon with GV70 styling elements?
imo that's a wagon, not a shooting brake, but ok
Designers would like you to believe it's a shooting brake xD
either way it looks amazing
Make it drive the same as the g70 sedan and you've got a winter
Winner*
hmmm not sold in Europe except Russia
So yea, it really sounds like I could run my RX-7 on E85 by simply upgrading the fuel pump and retuning the carb
Russia != Europe xD
though I'd probably have to get an O2 sensor to accurately tune the carb since E85 is much different than gas
the only part of Russia you should care about is in Europe
just luckily not in the EU
whereas with gas, you can just tune by ear and the tachometer
Well basically yes
I've tuned my car that way, lol
It's one of the biggest reasons why I like carbs far more than efi
Like, instead of getting an expensive ECU, and getting/learning the software or taking your car to a dyno and pay a tuner to do it for you
Yeah no mine can't be tuned like that
you just grab a screwdriver, warm up the motor, and start spinning screws until the tach reads the correct idle speed
I love me some Citroën DS cars
some, yes
I am really a sucker for their stylinh
too bad it's not the normal styling of citroën
This is easy
Tbh the newer C5 Aircross is nice too
Oof yeah well on no modern car you can do that ^^
I see what you mean, in case of the DS3, it's sister C3 looks way nicer
like, so what if carb is less efficient
its so easy to deal with, and they're so cheap
Well the regular DS 3 was nicer than the C3, but with the Crossback/Aircross... NAH
and on naturally aspirated motors, EFI is barely better in many cases
@civic girder imagine living in a country where every gram CO2 is taxed so more expensive injection cars are actually cheaper xD
🙃
imagine living in a county/state that doesn't care
well if you have a avarage fuel price of $ 7,259/ gallon
yikes
you want to have effiency
Just run LPG and get it in Belgium 
$2.33 a gallon, no emissions restrictions on 25 years or older
luckily I can get $6.931/gallon close by
And I thought Commiefornia gas was expensive, lol
well if I want to I maybe can get it for about $5,619/gallon
ah, I see
Liquified Petroleum Gas
can you not get E85?
E10 🤢
E10 is lame
my Prius gets lower mpg on E10 vs E5, lmao
Haven't tried E5, was advised by the garage to just use E10
and the engine is still reaching it's advertised consumption
despite being from 2009
I use like 15L of gas every 3000km, so less ethanol is better
E10 and E5 are also considered the same thing in the US. Most gas stations won't even tell you which blend their regular is using
Oof, we make distinction in E5 and E10
Yea, it's a gamble on what you will get when you fill up your car here
pumps are labeled Ethanol Content Up To 10%
Regular is usually 95E10 (or E10), premium is 98E5 (or E5). Some have 95E5, but those are special
98E10 doesn't exist
I think medium gas is definitely E5 tho
Premium might be even less ethanol than that
and then some gasstations have their own "super great" premium fuel
though not many gas stations have medium grade fuel
claiming that it will clean your engine etc
Only for their premium one, not the cheaper not special one
cause higher ethanol content would actually clean your engine more than pure gasoline
E85 can fuck up your fuel system cause it cleans so well, lmao
dunno what the difference is, both the premium and no premium E10 fuels tend to be labeled E10 at the pump
one with expensive branding, the other not
Additives mostly
Shell V-Power 
That's actually 97
But that's not a thing, so it's 95
But that's not a thing, so it's 95
So regular
We can also get 102 btw (Firezone)
any reason as to why go for higher octane rating, as a broke student?
Not going to spend several K€ on changing an engine
You don't have to change the engine 
If E85 really is as easy to convert to as new fuel lines, fuel reg, fuel pump, and carb retune, then fuck I might actually do it
I am very happy with my C1 with 1.0L engine 😛
Oof C1
Driven the Aygo and 107, hated it xD
Changing gears is like stirring soup xD
I have the luxurious version, with airco, electric windows and.....
4 speakers 
a tacho meter!
damn that's the really really basic one
Sounds like quality
IIRC the basic first gen Citroën C1 had central locking
like mine
however only at the driver side
the passenger side only locks that side
Idk this one was a Cool & Sound iirc, meaning it had a) AC and b) a radio with 2 speakers. That's it, nothing else
Only 2 airbags
I have to dig which version my one specific is
I wanted a small car, was already interested in a C1 (or any of it sisters)
I was glad I could have mine back after 5 days xD
and this one was for sale at the local very trusted garage
but the interior screams, small cheap car build in the crisis of 2008.
Yes 
The new C1 looks great, to bad it's 7K above budget 😛
Acceleration wasn't to bad, but probably since I was doing 64886486468 rpm since there's no tach
Yeah if going under 80kph, you need to rev it to 4k+ rpm to have decent acceleration
you won't win against a BMW at a traffic light, but you will win against 70% of all other drivers
I tend to go gear 1, 2, 4 and 5 when going from full stop to highway speed
So yours also has no decent power after 80kph 😛
bruh the one day i come to campus early to get a charging spot, the only one “available” is out of service
Be happy you do have a spot
@stoic ledge NOICE. I don't like driving above 130kph, too much consumption and noise
That hurts my wallet, despite me not paying your gas
Lol
should we just rename cars channel into Citroen c1s?
No
No
No
The old 107/C1/Aygo was terrible but the 2nd generation 108/C1/Aygo is much better in terms of build quality
Those new ones are actually quite fun to drive as well imo
Alright. Question. We all know that every engine out there burns oil. But how much is acceptable?
So that is a quart in roughly how many miles?
My E46 has burnt maybe half a quart in around 8,000 miles.
You're fine
Perfectly fine yes
Because I have other people saying otherwise. 
🤔
A quart is basically 1L, right?
And 8000 miles 12-13k km
So 500ml in 12000km is nothing
1L/1000km is in VWs factory spec

as far as I can tell, the 1NZ in my Prius doesn't burn oil at all
like, it would have to be such a small amount that you wouldn't notice
Cause I've gone well over 10k miles without even checking the oil, and its basically at full when I check right before the oil change
Well you should check fluids regularly 😛
The TL;DR is that you should change your oil when your manufacturere recommends it. Which is basically once a year, or every X distance.
It's 15k miles for my car. My oil still looks pretty good after 8k miles.
18k miles for mine
But I change it once a year (10k miles)
Never got the time thing tbh.
I take it in every year for the inspection etc, get it serviced then as well
The maintenance scheme for most cars are also xxx miles or x year(s)
Yeah.
I change my oil 4 times a year
i change my oil every year or so kekw
My BMW's maintenance checker says I should change the oil every 15k miles which is about 1 and a half years
I have a tune installed so I should probably change it earlier lol
Mine burns oil a bit inconsistently, but seems to average around 1 quart per 5k
Which isn't that bad for a 21y/o engine with high miles
Was using more because it was leaking like crazy from vcg but that's fixed now
I've been aiming to change every 5k
Your head gasket might be on it's way out. It might be leaking when the engine runs cold but seals up ok after it heats up.
Though It might also be just a BMW thing
who
me?
Mine tends to do it when you're cruise controlling on the highway at a constant speed
Since it's a 4 speed, rpms are quite high
It's not a head gasket thing
Probably just wear and tear.
if the Prius is burning oil, its cause I fucked it up
which honestly wouldn't surprise me that much
I haven't actually measured how much oil the RX-7 burns, nor do I measure out my 2 stroke
I do sort of track my mpg in the RX-7, but I don't keep records. I just do the math and reset the trip meter at each fuel stop
Last fuel stop I calculated 17mpg
as it turns out, having brakes that don't rub constantly helps increase your fuel efficiency
I'm up 4-5mpg from before my rear brakes were fixed
@fair bronze nein, in the 2nd gen (idk, 2014-now or something) you could get a 1.2 
1st gen, you could also get a 1.4 diesel 
(1.2 only in the 108/C1)
Just found out my car has a cold air intake... sort of.
I question why the intake tube goes across the front of the car, but it does draw air directly from the outside.
Yea, the Prius airbox is galaxy brain as well
the actual intake that initially succs the air is way down near the bottom of the car on the passenger side. That air goes up and into the side of the airbox, where it is then filtered and succed downwards into the intake manifold
Well at least modern cars fixed the one biggest issue of engine orientation.
Intake at the front, exhaust at the back.
Instead of the weird intake in the back, and the exhaust is now piped out the front and the exhaust has this weird loop under the engine it has to do.
Or just be the big chad and have intake and exhaust on the same side of the engine block
ICE people be like:
EmIsSiOnS aReN't A fLaW, iTs A fEaTuRe!1!1
because that was most definitely the topic of discussion, lol
yep
Unburnt hydrocarbons... Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of a carbureted car trying to start on a cold morning.
Yea, I love the smell of my RX-7. There's nothing like the hearing the sounds of a carbureted rotary engine combined with the smell of burnt gasoline and 2 stroke oil
Every time I sit in that car, it's like everything is right with the world
the old car smell of the interior, the exhaust smell
I thought that was a miata in the photo


