#cars
1 messages ยท Page 294 of 1
lmao
What color would you choose?
Highlight yellow.
probably factory color, but I am also considering respray to white
and I want pinstripes like factory regardless of the color I pick
Speaking of Yellow.
Good choice
This color is ๐
idk, I like the factory pinstripes on the RX-7
very subtle and small
you almost don't even realize they're there
Btw, That's the GT3 Touring.
This one has the pinstripes
That doesn't look bad
It's subtle
Well done
The pickup was doing a 3-point turn in the middle of no where.
Also, it was a blind corner.
mine has pinstripes
I wasn't a fan of the grey when i bought the car
but its grown on me
I'll probably keep it the same color when it gets repainted
It's a typical 80s color
๐ช๏ธ 
Very 80s rims too (:
yep
they need to get worked on tho
they are scuffed pretty bad
not really curb rash, but they are not perfect
I wanted to have a go in the Alfa we used to have.
They look really cool on the RX-7
156 with the V6.
Busso V6 ftw
oh yea, I think the car is basically perfect
just needs some minor upgrades and some restore work on the body/paint/interior
probably a new rust-proof undercoat too, and fix any rust that somehow got in there
though that's probably overkill
Nothing is overkill if you love it ^^
true
but not something I can afford right now
Such a nice looking engine.
Mhm
Dust can make any car look nasty
It was missing a wiper?
the engine bay was nasty
@fair bronze no, the prev owner had taken it off to remove the vent and clean out leaves
yea
half the bay is radiator and fan shroud, lmao
not the best pic of the engine bay, but this is pretty close to what it looks like now. Not super clean, but way better than it was
New alternator?
yee
Looks shiny
I swapped the old 50amp FB alternator for an 83amp FC alternator
zoom zoom
Oof more amps
Looks like my summer car I wish I could play it some day
just buy it
After traveling all around Scandinavia and visiting various automotive events, we could clearly see that the locals really love their own Nordic car brands, especially one brand in particular - Volvo. And there is no wonder why. Almost all Volvo's up until early 90's were rea...
nah
don't think that video will change my mind
I will still want to get more rotaries
all the rotaries
What about the Lolvo?
Support us on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/theskidfactory
Buy merch here: https://www.theskidfactory.com
Today on The Skid Factory, We take a look at Pete's Turbo V8 Volvo 240 Wagon or otherwise known as the Lolvo, Brick, Beige Heartbreaker, Dunning Krugarmobile.
Origin...
Picked up a brochure for my car. My slow descent into Toyota fandom can now begin.
Volvo's never die
Old Volvo's are invincible
New Volvo's are nice looking and stuff but will die in a few years
๐ค what's that
volvos are easy to kill
Just snip-snip the brake lines.
GUEST: Ernie Brink, Inventor
TOPICS:
4:57 - Reviving the Rotary Engine
38:27 - Doctor Data
44:09 - McLaren: They Don't Make Money
48:22 - Hyundai Spending $52-billion Getting Smarter
53:26 - Toyota RAV4: 425,000 Sold in 2019
56:32 - PSA & FCA Getting Closer
1:06:46 - Sales S...
Mazda should hire this dude
The rotary can come back
wot
this guy's solution would fix that
rotaries have shit fuel economy because of the spark plugs
fuel/air mix can leak past the the apex seal and into the exhaust stroke, which is why there is unburnt fuel exiting the engine
and then the engine is unreliable because of where the spark plugs are and how it fires
the apex seals chatter because you fire the plugs at the side of the rotor vs the tip
well, I mean more specifically as the main power plant
so we bought a race car
but I doubt the range extender motor will have this design
i have all the photos from my phone on my computer now so
this was on the way to washington
Wow an Audi
๐ค
I've seen a few around here
Oh boy, wait till you hear about my lovely story I had today
So my brother has a 2wd F150
We went to a bunch of junkyards to find a back window for a car
There's this off-roading spot in town right by the river
And at this place, no one can get stuck
There's no mud
Or so we thought
It's been raining for the last three days here
The place was so damn muddy
We even avoided the mud
But we got stuck and started sliding down the hill
We hit a rut and almost flipped the truck
We finally were able to get the truck down the hill
Where it was mud galore
I knew that if we went slow, we'd get stuck again.
So I had him mash the throttle and just send it
Thank God he had newer all-terrain tires
So we just slammed the throttle and I got covered with mud pushing the truck
Then he spun the truck out
Almost into the river
Well we got it turned around to go back to the entrace
We just kept the throttle pinned and plowed through the deep holes and puddles
And we got stuck again
This time we were inches away from the huge river
We finally got the damn thing moving again
And got stuck again
It took 2 hours to get the damn thing back to the entrance
I was covered in mud from his tires
Mud was on me head to toe
And I had a date with my girlfriend 30 minutes after that
lmaoo
Not fun
This is why I wonder how people enjoy offroading
It was soooo damn muddy that a 4wd truck couldn't get us unstuck
oof
I doubt I'd enjoy it, but that's just me
I'd rather be puttering along in my slow cars
I bet you'd enjoy doing donuts in the grass
We thought about having my parents come and pick me up to get my truck
I wish I would've filmed the whole thing
Once we got it moving once more, he STOPPED for me!
And it got stuck again
So after that we got it moving and he just sent it and got the rest of the way back
Sometimes when you are stuck, ya can't give it any power at all
Or you'll dig a giant rut
This wasn't the case though
So he just had the tires spinning and it finally dug down and bit into the solid ground underneath
@eager kite I'm a huge supporter of burning oil for energy, Teslas be damned 
Well, if Daimler/Mercedes is anything to go by, won't be long before there will be nothing left for you to support @normal temple
Daimler's reach is pretty massive.
Anyway. Quite happy to have picked up a Toyota Corolla hatchback sales brochure today.
tbh I feel bad for these traditional auto companies
Like, it seems like they're actually trying now to make EVs
And their EVs would be good if this was 2012-14
but uh, definitely not with today's tech.
Taycan is a perfect example. Porsche put it all into that car, and it's performance is just slightly worse than a Perf. Model S. But, they sacrificed efficiency to do it and thus the S gets 80% more range for 55% the cost.
performance is markedly better lol
not worse
though the model S is a VERY outdated car
mmm, 0-60 is about the same
1/4 mile is also about the same
one thing the Taycan is better at though is repeatable launches
and the Taycan doesn't overheat in 3 minutes, handles much better
and is a far more well built car
and quicker around the nurburgring
Yep, but unless you're taking these cars for actual races, the only 3 things that you will actually notice is 0-60, 1/4 mile, and range
You won't notice door trim falling off?
Or shit tastic infotainment performance?
Or leather falling apart in 2 years?
Guarantee that all of that and more will happen on Taycans as well
Every car line has faults
Tesla makes cool cars that are shittily made
No Tesla has ever approached the quality of a legacy automaker
Taycan will have production quality issues, guaranteed
As do all cars
The things you mentioned for the S are not common problems, sure they happen to a few cars which sucks, but it's not like 1 in every 2 S' have the trim falling off and their leather seats ripping apart after 2 years
no, they all do. Tesla has terrible interior quality in all but the Model 3, which is roughly on par with a base model economy car
I mean, they literally all don't, but whatever you want to tell yourself I guess.
I'm curious how much the Plaid Model S will be, probably will be highly competitive with the Taycan
So far, companies are making pretty good EVs honestly.
I still think Tesla has the advantage in a lot of areas though compared to others. Probably because they have more experience.
Not here to argue who has the advantage, but Toyota has more experience than any other automobile manufacturer when it comes to experience, other than Chevy, but even then, they don't count because the oil industry paid them to destroy thousands of electric cars and stop research & development on them.
I mean, someone posted a video in here not too long ago, and other manufactures with EV's lasted pretty long compared to a Tesla, only a little worse.
But their efficiencies are horrible compared to Teslas
and their ranges suck for the price
like if they were made back in 2012-16, they would be competitive with Teslas of the time
The ranges were only like, 10-20 km worse...
And frankly they aren't that expensive compared to a Tesla.
Mind you, the technology is better, specifically Autopilot and stuff, but everything else is pretty close if not equal.
what's an example? @night current
Kia Niro, Jaguar I-pace
Audi E-Tron looks ๐
And that
Audi E-Tron looks great
I also think the Mercedes EQC looks pretty decent
the EQC is kinda ugly imo, but thats a matter of taste
True
Kia Niro, not the greatest efficiency,
long range epa rating is only 239 miles with a 64kwh pack, only 100kw of charging, 0-60 in 7.5 seconds, only 150kw motor
standard is ~150 miles epa w/ 40kwh pack, less powerful motor....
starting price of almost $50k usd...
but is built well and will last, unlike a Tesla.
I-pace, where to begin.
90kwh battery, only 234 miles epa range, 100kw charging, 2x 150kw motors, starting price $70k USD
but a proper luxury interior
tesla has good battery/motor tech, yes. Everything else is lacking.
Tesla Model 3 Long Range is also 50k. Kia only went 30 miles less
How far can these electric cars go before they die?! We drove the Tesla Model 3, Audi e-tron, Jaguar I-Pace, Nissan Leaf, Kia e-Niro and Mercedes EQC across the UK to see how long they could last! Sure, the smart money is on the Tesla, with its claimed range of up to 348 mile...
rx = 0$ and 250 miles
Walking = $2.50 burger, and 250 calories
Audi E-Tron (literally means shit in french):
95kwh batter limited to 84kwh usable, EPA range of only 204 miles, 150kw charging, 75K USD starting price
But the E-Tron is aesthetically one of the most attractive EVs, again a quality build and interior, and a luxury brand
& has an established dealer network
sorry, it's 75K for the one that has a 71kwh battery limited to 65kwh, only get 150 mile range
I mean, a $120k Model X gets you almost the same range as a 50k Model 3
sufficive to say, all of these suck in comparison to Teslas
It's just the type of quality you're going for.
- you can't fucking spell lol, and 2. No, there's more than just range and power.
and has a charging network
pro tip
People get Rolls Royce, and they get less range...
People pay for the quality and ride.
cgp grey
you can charge your car literally anywhere there's an outlet
But yea, these cars are mega overpriced for what they deliver in 2020
especially the E-Tron
that thing is horrible
nah, some people value sitting in a car that doesn't feel like a Kia Sephia in terms of quality
You get quality with the e-tron, and a comfortable ride.
ok, but that wasn't the contention we were discussing
Plus a bomb-ass entertainment thingy
Hm? Not necessarily.
bruh
self driving cars already exist long before autonomous cars
its called taxis
- James May
I didn't know numbers were subjective now
I said the ranges were worse than a Tesla's. The price for the Niro and a few others are cheaper than Tesla.
Look, you can complain about the interiors of Teslas all you want, that's a personal comfort thing
but when it comes down to hardware
I'm not complaining. I think they are nice. But I also enjoy other manufactures interiors also
Tesla mopped the floor with the competition
Not really years...
Model S long range, starting price of 80k, gets an epa range of 373 miles
that's close to double the E-Tron's for the same price
If you're paying that much for a vehicle, I doubt you care about range that much.
Model X starting price $85k, epa range of 328 miles
100 miles more range than the I-pace for $15k more
?
niro goes up against the 3/Y
I-pace has a claimed range of 292 miles. Only $15k more for only 36 more miles
What is the Tesla's based on then?
all the ranges I've been giving are using EPA
Model 3 long range starting price $49K, EPA range of 322 miles
In real world Testing, they don't go that far
Model Y long range RWD starting price $48k, EPA range 300 miles
AWD starting price 52K, EPA range 280 miles
those last 2 ranges are Tesla range estimates as the Y hasn't been tested by EPA yet
however, Tesla usually is conservative on their estimates
idk what's going on, people don't buy cars for how far they go on the spec sheet. They buy cars based on how nice they are to drive/live with. Sorry to say, but Teslas build quality is abysmal compared to other cars like Audis and stuff
Ehhh, I've seen testing of the Model 3 that supposedly has "322" miles only going 270.
for $50k with the Kia Niro, you get an EPA range of 150 miles
so the Tesla's are getting around double the range for the same price
legit, none of the cars you guys mentioned are even close to Teslas
It went 250 in the test video. I think you're basing that off the lowest standard model
Yes, the base model which starts at $50k
No it doesn't...
yes it does
it starts at 38k
38k dollars
nope
It starts from ยฃ37,995 or ยฃ34,495 (โฌ40,677/$45,350) after deducting the government Plug-in Car Grant
Now this is epic
It's not going to magically go up 12k for being a year newer
It has an EPA-estimate of 239 miles for the 38k version
Only 11 less than the Tesla Model 3
that's literally what the insideEVs article says above, the 2020 model starting price is 38k pounds
Base edition model 3*
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/23/man-died-burning-tesla-because-its-futuristic-doors-wouldnt-open-lawsuit-alleges/ guys stop buying Teslas they catch on fire /s
Articles aren't the dedicated website to vehicles...
Also, I think the Kia is a bit more conventional... Considering that it is an Sub-SUV.
Ok, I guess the 2020 version is just a bit worse than the 2019
regardless, the efficiency of the 3 is about 34% better than the Niro, also has the advanced tech inside
which is probably why they're priced about the same
I mean, you have to pay another 7k for self-driving autopilot which is why I'd mainly buy a Tesla.
sure, but right now we're comparing base prices. The car is perfectly functional and comes with AP for that starting price
Super basic auto pilot, but yeah, still AP.
I mean, it's pretty similar to what the cutting edge of what all other luxury manufacturers are releasing with their cars rn
so, FSD is kind of a bonus package
actually, the competing car I'm most excited for is the ID.3
even though it won't sell in the US
it's probably the best traditional auto EV to date, although right now all the ones produced are sitting in parking lots having engineers update their firmware one by one
Plaid S might come out before any ID.3's actually are delivered to customers though, that will be funny to see.
https://i.redd.it/vnhxu5an0n741.png man I really dig the wheels here.
The hatchback looks super snazzy with lower springs and nice wheels.
yes
Tesla Model 3 LR 75kWh: 270 miles / 434km = 3.6 miles/kWh
Kia e-Niro 64kWh: 255 miles / 410km = 3.98 miles/kWh
So which one is more efficient? ๐ค
Also: Model 3 LR: โฌ60k
E-Niro 64kWh: โฌ42k
Also, that Twitter message about Tesls selling 112k EVs in Q4 vs 55 Mercedes is plain out false, in my country alone Mercedes sold 151 EVs
@eager kite
don't know where you got 270 mile range for the model 3
cause it's 322
that's 4.293 mi/kwh
kia e-Niro 64kwh has 239 mile range
Those are the realworld results from the test Carwow did
that's 3.734 mi/kwh
we aren't comparing his real world tests, we're comparing EPA range
Just taking numbers we can rely on to be consistently calculated between cars
So real world tests of cars driving on the exact same day, driving the exact same route in the exact same traffic at the exact same speed isn't realistic?
They switched cars many times, obv took breaks for that
traffic wasn't the exact same for all of them
each one of them accelerates differently
in one car the guy couldn't engage the cruise control if I remember correctly? So he was driving manually for a while there
not consistent or reliable for comparisons like this
You have to stick to legitimate standards
Every EV tested by the EPA is put through basically the exact same test scenarios, and their scores are measured
from that, they use the same equation to calculate their estimated range
way more accurate and useful for comparative analysis
But their test cycli doesn't conform real road usage
also iirc, in those tests they weren't at 100% battery before they started
so, automatically they will not get ranges that reflect the maximum range of the cars
No they all left them over night so they were at 96-97% of range
and they didn't give us percentages for every single car, so we have no way to know what every car started at
they said in the video "above 95%"
that's not specific
Well you're not going to drive up to --% either with your EV are you?
They showed every screen at the start
no, but appealing to their tests to use their ranges as what the cars actual range is, is disingenuous.
So you can figure out which one is which
Anyway, their tests results are not valid when trying to make a legitimate comparison between cars and their efficiencies
if you don't like the EPA numbers, take it up with them, not me
If you say so
Guess I'll have to start driving small diesels now since they get incredible ratings
It's not about me saying so, it's literally how you do comparative analysis. If you're trying to isolate 1 variable (in this case the car) you can't have other variables floating around in your calculations. All other variables need to be controlled, including testing conditions. Therefor, you have to use a testing system that tests all the cars the same.
So you can chose EPA, WLTP, etc... Theoretically, it shouldn't matter how off these standards are from reality, because it would affect all cars in the set equally, due to them being tested under identical conditions.
Also, the standards mentioned measure multiple of the cars to account for each car performing slightly differently than the others
whereas 1 guy taking 1 car from each and driving them till they die doesn't account for that at all
Yeah no not really... The way they are being tested for the EPA/WLTP/.. doesn't reflect how you use it irl. When you look at how slow they accelerate in that test, it's unrealistic. If you use a turbo engine, it's barely going to use the Turbo so it's basically a N/A engine, which is efficient. In the real world it does, massively use more fuel. If you look at N/A engines, they come close to the given numbers
Also: all in a lab, with "perfect" circumstances, manufacturers can set unrealistic variables like extremely high tyre pressures which could temper the results
In all real-world tests I've seen (like the one from Carwow, but also paper magazines etc) they've all got similar results
Again, when doing comparative analysis, none of that matters because the testing conditions for each car are the same or extremely similar
My car gets better than what EPA rated my car at 
Fake news @normal temple
Pretty real news tbh
But no it's not very similar for each car, since the effects can be very different on each individual car
But yea, using EPA is probably the best one out of the 3 standards because it's the closest to reality
When comparing EV's the effects should be comparable
when talking about ICEV, that's a different subject because there's a lot you can play with there
But apparently it's not, because the e-Niro got over the EPA in that test while the Model 3 LR stayed under it iirc? 

And again, that test has waaaaaay too many unknow variables to be taken with anything but a metric ton of salt
And to prove my point
Yeah because again, driving the exact same route in a train of cars is very inaccurate
this guy got 272 miles on US highways in a standard range plus 3
All of this is a scam, my parent's 2 ton SUV can get 550 miles per tank, its time to just stay with oil 
giving him an efficiency of 5.44 miles/kwh
well above EPA estimate
but, again, this is a single guy's anecdotal test with uncontrolled variables messing with the data
so, you shouldn't use this guy's range test as much as the comparative one you keep citing
the title slide of the video is poor. he doesn't go 272 on a single charge, he just goes 272 total trip with an hour charge in middle. the punchline was he got 12% less range than rated going highway speeds near entire time
L U L
Also: no comment on my Twitter statement using false data 
InsideEVs didn't state what the charge was, so thought it wasn't a part of his range calc.
(watched entire vid this time lol)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdUaM_w6-Dg&vl=en
Welcome back for another episode of Now You Know! On today's episode, Zac tests out the real world range of the model 3!
For information on the Tesla referral program, send us a message on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nowyouknowchannel
Follow us at:
@NYKchannel - Twit...
Anyway, overall point still stands that anecdotal range tests shouldn't be used when standardized range tests exist when doing comparative analysis between EVs
@stoic ledge this is what they were referring to with the 55 number https://www.carscoops.com/2020/01/mercedes-benz-sold-just-55-eqc-evs-in-germany-in-november/
they def misquoted it bc it was just talking about November sales, but that's still pretty pathetic to only sell 55 in a month
Well Tesla Q4 for the entire world vs Mercedes in 1 month in 1 country isn't representative ๐
Tesla sold way more EVs undoubtedly
yep, agreed
But atleast use actual numbers ๐
I mean it is an actual number, just misquoted
Sandy Munro analysis:
600k @Ford F150s
$50M Dies
$65M Body Shop
$500M Paint Shop
โโโโโโโโ
$615M Cap Ex
600k @Tesla Cybertrucks
$30M Dies
$35M Body Shop
$60M Paint Shop
โโโโโโโโ
$125M Cap Ex
No wonder @elonmusk doesnโt want to paint Cybe...
524
This whole entire conversation is stupid. Just get a Nissan Leaf or a Prius Prime
waaaay cheaper, high quality car
sure, range will suffer, but it's cheap and nice
plus, the Prius has a range extender so it's EV range is negated
and by extension, I'd say the Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid and Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid also fit under that banner. Sure, their EV range is as trash as the Prius, but they are large vehicles that are quite practical
If I were to go out and buy an EV today, with an unlimited budget, I'd get one of those four.
I might have gone for the Golf-E personally.
eh
If I was going to get a VW, I'd probably be getting a Diesel Passat
But the Golf-E certainly isn't bad
except that the Leaf has double the range for a less
125 miles for $30k? please
The Leaf sure is a good deal. But the VW would have a better interior and such.
highly depends on personal taste, I'd think
Yeah
Definitely gonna be someone who values the slightly better interior over 100+ more miles
I would seriously consider getting an EV if we just had a place to charge it.
For me, I probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference in interior quality/comfort
I'd be fixated on the pricing and specs
The e Golf has over 200 km's range. Which is plenty for whatever I would want to use it for.
Then, if I were to go spend my own hard earned cash (not a hypothetical situation), I'd be getting the Prius. I would seriously look at the Mazda MX-30, but we don't really have much info on it yet (would also depend on whether or not it actually has a rotary range extender, and the price)
Just need to get into the habit of hooking it up on the daily.
My work commute is 50 km either way.
Yea, that's where a car like the Prius Prime is nice. Even if you forget to charge it, you can still drive it
There are heaps of hybrid cars you can get now.
Personally, I care more about the functionality of the car rather than if it's cheap. Buying ICEV is a dying practice, no need to prop it up further imo.
Ugh, this reminds me of how I can't drive my car on a street here in Stockholm.
My car isn't green enough.
Idk mang, a $60k car that is no more practical (and possibly less functional) sounds awful to me
Why pay the premium on a Tesla that has low range and has barely more features and practicality
I could daily my RX-7 if I really wanted to. Lots of cargo space, I rarely have more than one passenger (and even that is rare), and has better range than an EV.
I have nothing against Tesla, but when you go around claiming it's objectively better in every way without considering alternatives (or actual objective facts), then there's a problem.
Just save yourself the headache and let the bandwagon go by
When did I ever claim that a Tesla is objectively better in every way?
Tesla's are good for range.
And tbh. You got a really good deal if you bought the first Model S and drove it into the ground.
Since supercharger use was free.
Generally if you own a Tesla you don't even use the supercharger network that often unless traveling
Yeah. But that's should be most EV cars in general.
EV's shine for daily use and charging it at whatever location you're going to.
@civic girder You know Tesla's start at ~40k right? You would need to add a bunch of stuff on top to get it that high.
I'd think that a car with the technology to drive itself would have more functionality than one which doesn't and is more practical to use in everyday life than ICEV.
Long range is good, but it's not necessary for most people in their lives. The only time long range helps is if you go on road trips. For daily commuting, not needed.
imo, the self driving is a meme. You still have to pay attention or you'll die.
$40k is a lot. You can get 50mpg out of a normal hybrid car for half the cost.
Sure, range is unnecessary in commuting, but not everyone can:
-afford a car that expensive
-charge an EV effectively
Not to mention, people don't like range anxiety. Even if they don't need more range, they'd be more comfortable knowing that they could go longer without stopping or risk getting stranded. "most" is a pretty vague term as well, I've met numerous people who drive more miles in a day than most EVs can do on a charge. And where I live, EV is a pretty dumb choice unless you work down the street and rarely go out shopping for anything more than errands at Walmart and other nearby shops. I only know of two charging locations anywhere near me, one is 15 minutes away in a parking lot in downtown, the other is an hour away (I'm not including the two charging stations at my college since only faculty are allowed to use them).
TL;DR - Hybrids are still alright.
^
Hybrids ftw
In fact, we need more hybrids
The EVs of today are a great stepping stone, but they are not the go-to choice for a vast majority of people
Small cars are also underrated. So much to mess around with.
But the question is just - Is the Hybrid premium worth it over non-hybrid?
Definitely
first time I've seen a modern car on the side of the highway that wasn't in an accident or had a flat tire
normally the only cars you see on the side of the highway are 90s and early 2000s beaters that are on the brink of death
In the long run you save money because of the way better fuel economy
^
Also less emissions in city areas
Mhm
We still need a better charging infrastructure.
That is one of the larger parts of why EVs can't happen yet
Especially for homes.
Sure, I could go buy an EV today. But where the fuck am I gonna charge it
You have to pay attention while using AP yes, but if you weren't you wouldn't just like suddenly die lol.
Yep, agree that 40k is a lot. However, there's a clear and unmistakable trend of EVs getting cheaper over the last decade. Will not be very long before purchasing price of ICEV/PHEVs is the same as EVs
Yep, right now you kind of need a garage or driveway to charge EV effectively. Thankfully though, this is being addressed worldwide by having more public charging stations and businesses installing them.
Range anxiety is just classic FUD from someone who doesn't own an EV. If anything, you get more range anxiety from owning ICEV, gotta make sure you don't run out of gas on the highway or while going to work, and the car is too dumb to really do anything about it like warn you ahead of time...
The cool thing about EVs is you don't need EV gas stations, they can be charged at your house. So unless there are no electricians in your area, there's no legitimate charging reason why a home owner couldn't own an EV @civic girder
lmao
I mean, you still don't understand, lol
understand what?
No one is installing charging stations except cities. And cities don't have that kind of money
The biggest reason why people are unable to charge at home is that they might not have an actual garage to park in.
I'd be surprised if a new charging station opened within 50 miles of me within the next 2 years
@civic girder literally there are charging stations everywhere in small towns what are you talking about...
And the only charging stations I've seen aren't even Tesla superchargers
Then, about the homeowner thing.......You do realize that 240V chargers are expensive, right? and that electricians are expensive, right?
I've checked that site before
We have either public parking, or a shared garage for our street.
A 240v outlet is not that expensive
if you can afford to buy a Tesla, you can afford to get a 240v outlet
not always
bruh
people love to make stupid financial decisions
It's a fair assumption, but isn't always the case
It's a cost you need to take into account when buying an EV.
ok, ofc there's edge cases where the house would need rewiring because it's from the 1920s, but for most people it's not a hassle
I'm pretty sure 75% of the charging stations shown for my area on plugshare don't actually exist
why don't you drive to one someday and see
Our shared garage needs a full rewiring if you want to use EV chargers.
why?
my entire house would need to get rewired if we wanted a 240V car charger
Bruh just get an electrician bruh
it's up to code, but the circuitry is big brain
Houses and everyone on our street was built over 45 years ago.
Your house has smol pp
We have issues with my mom's plug-in hybrid being on 120V
literally just need a 60A breaker installed in your breaker box and conduit ran to where you need it
not that hard, costs few hundred bucks for an electrician to do it
or like $50 if you know what you're doing
doubt
don't recommend the 2nd option though
It would probably cost upwards of $1k or more
the breaker box is opposite side of the house from the garage
the breaker costs like $20
and the house is 40+ years old
yea, parts are gonna be cheap, no doubt
but its still gonna take a long ass time to do
and I'm certain something would need to get rewired
so unless your breaker box is like in the basement of your house on the opposite side from your garage, then it's pretty cheap to get it wired
and you don't need to rewire your entire house to add a breaker
may as well if the breaker box is open
what???
our circuits are big brain, as I said earlier
If the garage door is closed while I am running a graphics intensive game on my PC, then a circuit will trip
breaker box is open, therefor I should spend many thousands of dollars to rewire my entire house
since my room and the garage are on the same circuit for some god forsaken reason
bruh what are u smoking right now
lemme get the contact info of your dealer real quick
lmao
seems he got some high quality product
assuming I am high, it'd be off the exhaust fumes from my rotary
but yea
the chargers shown on plugshare are mostly at car dealerships
I highly doubt any random dude can just roll into a BMW dealer and plug in their Tesla
usually can unless it's gated off
but most tesla's wouldn't be going to 7kw chargers
cause that would take a while to charge
but what would I do at a BMW dealer for an hour while I wait for my car to charge
you wouldn't be there in the first place
Look at cars you can't afford
I'm assuing that most dealers are cheap. And only install basic chargers.
I'd also assume they wouldn't let you charge your car there if you aren't looking at cars to buy
ok but why would you be there in the first place?
to charge my EV that has poor range because I decided that ICE and hybrids were big brain and not worth my money
"Bye honey, I'm going to the dealership to charge my car, I'll be back in like an hour or so"
like, sure I could get a 240V installed in my house
but I can't walk into the store across town if its at my house
I mean unless you're getting a really shitty range EV like some $15k chinese pos, then that shouldn't be a problem
like even the base leaf has what, 150 miles of range?
I don't know many people that drive 150 miles a day
150 miles when new
120 after a few years
If you're lucky
still don't know many people driving that much
Can't drive to my grandparents and back with that
most Americans are driving like 40-50 miles a day
so
100+ would be more than enough
So basically you're saying when you have an EV you should get an ICE car for the longer trips
so basically what you're saying is that I should buy two cars
If you have a car with 150 miles. then you're plenty good.
The Leaf is getting kinda expensive, tho.
no, I'm saying that the hypotheticals ur coming up with are unrealistic
More range. Mora batteries. More price.
Yeah we all barely leave our house
yea, like the dealership charger hypothetical
basically never going to happen
cause basically any EV you buy will have more than enough range for any daily activities
Just get a bicycle, 0 emissions
and when you get home at night you plug it in
The Leaf is starting from like 400,000 kr here in Sweden. Which is basically $40k
100% back in the morning, another 150 mile range ready to go
Yea, I don't see that happening where I live
150 miles would be cutting it close, really close
That will be fun if everyone has an EV, everyone comes home from work at around the same time and start charging their car
how many miles do you drive a day?
and then I wouldn't be able to charge it on 240V in my current living situation
wot
so you're saying I need a really fucking long cord to reach outside and to the end of my driveway
Hah. I have seen that on our street.
If you're too cheap to get the outlet installed where you need it, then you could buy an extension cord and bring the power there that way
in my current living situation, I could not do either
It's not my house, and I do not have a spot in the garage for even 120V. And I can guarantee they wouldn't let me take a long ass cable across the house and down the driveway
are you renting?
or rooming?
if so, then yea an EV probably isn't for you atm.
but you are a small subset of the public
the majority of the public can have an EV, be able to do all daily activities in it
definitely wouldn't say majority
for road trips you basically need a Tesla if you want an EV, so that's still relatively expensive
but again, that price is going down over time
and there are more charging stations being built up finally
for road trips I would never get an EV until they have 600+ mile range and can recharge in seconds
so in other words, you don't ever want an EV
95% of my road trips would take forever with any modern EV
even the long range Teslas
press X to doubt
?
A Better Routeplanner (ABRP) for planning trips and charging with a Electric Vehicle - both home and in-car.
yea, that's 40 minutes I could be driving
Taking brakes is a good thing. ๐
and I'd have to take a route that goes waaaaaaaaaay out of the way so I could stop at a charger
you'd probably stop for a portion of that time already to refuel
I'm only allowed to drive for 4 and a half hours at work before I am required to take a 45 minute break.
nope
In every car my family has (except my RX-7), we can make it my dad's parents on a single tank of gas
@civic spoke Trucking?
Yee to the haw
yes you probably can, but then you're just stopping before the trip to top up your gas tank @civic girder
for 7 hours?
yea, most people don't drive for 7 hours straight
I do cause I hate stopping
not good for you either
ok, so again, you're breaking from the norm pretty significantly
I'm kind of the same. But I rarely have to drive for so many hours in one go.
most people have bladders that need emptying from time to time
Longest would be roughly 5 hours up to our cousins.
or drink water
yea, drinking water keeps you going
You definitely can't drink water and drive at the same time
nope, cause then you would have to piss
yea you can, you just need one of those straw bottles
and that would mean you need to stop
Just pee in the bottle
ahh, I see, it's big brain time
Big brain
yo, why even stop for food if you can just find some random shit laying around in your car and eat that
drinking coffee or a carbonated beverage will mean you have to stop tho
Having a stop every now and then is a good idea tbh
I just don't want my car to tell me when I should stop
To stretch your legs, get some fresh air
even if we stop, we still don't have to stop for fuel
Just get a catheter and install one of those water bags on the back of the seat. smh
15 mins max will do
I only do that if someone else is in the car and needs a break, or I didn't make proper preparations beforehand and am getting tired
idk, most drives I do are only 200-300 miles, so I usually stop once or twice especially when towing.
I want to drive down to the Nurburgring sometime. But it's like 1,500 km for me.
Can technically do it in one day. But that would take 15-16 hours.
Would want to leave at like 5-6 am if I wanted to do it in one day.
8 hours is usually the max I can do all at once. 7 hours is fine, but much more than 8 and I'll need to stop for a long break or swap drivers
I assume you have cruise control as well
I mean, I've driven quite a few hours without cruise control
Yeah but your right leg gets stiff after a few hours
yes, driving for many hours without cruise control is not pleasant, but it's far from awful
My right foot is cruise control for my work truck. 
Since foot on the floor is 90 kmh.
It's doable but not ideal
I mean, I didn't really have a problem with it
my foot/leg wasn't really that sore afterwards either
I would love to have adaptive cruise control.
But the problem is that I would have to get an automatic for that.
Manual is love.
Manual is life.
Adaptive cc is annoying when you drive behind someone who cannot maintain speed
Manual ftw
just get a manual with cc
^
I have that.
eew manual
look, I'll give manual this
Adaptive cruise control would just be bliss for bumper to bumper traffic.
it's a built-in anti-theft system
automatic is bliss in bumper to bumper
lol, anti-theft isn't the only reason manuals are nice
but everything else about manual succ
lmao
No? ๐ค
just get 1 gear
Just get a CVT. lmao
The EV purist shows his colors
EV love EV life
I've driven CVTs, hybrids, automatics, manuals, and EVs.
Automatics in traffic jams aren't perfect either, I have to keep my foot on the brake pedal all the time
CVT hybrids and manuals are the best
CVT non-hybrid sucks
automatics are sluggish
manuals are fun, even if the rest of the car is lame
JD, Just get one that has the hold feature.
EVs are boring
Hold feature?
Holds the brakes for you, until you press the accelerator.
Which car has that
Plenty.
Never heard of it before
Automatic Brake Hold is what Honda calls it.
HondaPro Jason explains how to use the "Brake Hold" function on the new 2016 HR-V. Great when you're caught at a long train or you just want to relax and take your foot off the brake. You're HR-V will hold it's position until you hit the accelerator!
The only Hondas I'm interested in are pre-1990
It's not only a Honda thing, tho
I've never heard of this feature
It's pretty nice for stoplights.
Though idk. I don't know if I can see myself using this feature much
Work truck has the hill hold feature. But I don't really use that.
more so than me getting an EV, but still
I personally just use the parking brake to aid me from rolling back on hills.
I just keep my foot on the brake
parking brake only for hill starts
even more so when the dude behind you pulled a big brain and pulled up mm from your bumper but you have a manual
though it would be their fault if you hit them
cause they didn't give you space
Held up by a passing train or just waiting at a traffic light, the Mercedes-Benz Brake Hold function is a convenient way to keep you safely stopped without having to keep your foot on the pedal the whole time. Watch this video to learn how to use this simple, yet very helpful...
CCC?
Actually now that I have looked up what the button for it looks like, I think my dad's Seat has it
Could also look like this.
Anything that has that symbol (O) has something to do with the brakes.
Who needs the p-break for hills ๐ค (or what sort of a mountain do you live on)
On steep hill I use the handbrake while parking... Otherwise just 1st gear :)
Or when trying to start on a steep hill, then it's useful too
lol plebs with manuals ;p
Did you mean: "drivers with good control of their vehicle"? ๐
Handbrakes are fun, not the Electric ones but the one with a lever you cab pull on super duper hard, so hard the next person struggles to get is off xD
Well mine has hill-start assist so it holds the brake on a hill for a few seconds
I park in gear pretty much always.
Same
I put my car in park and call it good, unless it's a big hill and then I use the brake
I put it in gear with the handbrake on
No handbrake if itโs near 0 degrees celsius
You guys say that like its a bad thing
Here I am in negative C weather and my handbrake is fine
Was -30c this past week here, colder with the wind chill. Always parked with my handbrake and no issues
I'm not good with my C to F conversions, but I'd say it's probably around -8C right now
I've parked my car in -10C weather and not had handbrake issues tho
I dislike using gear as my parking brake
@civic girder The main issue is moisture when it's sub-zero
If it's dry there's no issue
I'm just doing it to prevent it from happening at all
I still don't get it
Handbrake + freezing can result in getting it stuck
I'd rather avoid than heal tbh xD
If it's been raining or the air is just humid on its own, it can freeze stuck
Or for example if the brake disc is warm and the handbrake pad is cold, the temperature difference will result in condensation, which will freeze if it gets cold quickly enough
Hardbrake is usually drum brakes
Even with rear disks, there's often another drum brake behind it just for the handbrake xD
It's still a cold pad (shoe) on a warm disc
Wot, ebrake is a drum?
Learning to drive, I'd use the handbrake to start on hills. Eventually I moved on to using it only on steep hills and when cars were super close behind me.
After a point I stopped bothering... and ngl... I kinda wish I could disable hill hold on my Corolla.
I need to replace my handbrake pads, etc.
Will probably do normal pads and rotors while I'm at it.
Fancy
๐
I love the key I got for the RX-7
100x cooler than the key I got when I bought the car
Posting keys online
Always great to create replicas and steal it 
it's not that difficult actually
^ not really that difficult indeed ๐
You're welcome ๐
https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesmanian-blog/vw-again-delayed-the-long-waiting-id-3-to-spring-2021
That's nothing new.
The Golf was also delayed half a year due to software issues.
At this point if a boomer wants to point out how modern cars have gotten too clever... now is a great time.
Cause VW is handing out those jokes gratis.
I'm gonna run the motor tomorrow. She could use the exercise. But no driving. But maybe if my street isn't salted I could go up and down the circle a couple times
Rotary
Prius I drove a couple times today. Once just to put miles on her and the other to pick up my brother
out of curiosity, is there a way to force the prius to idle?
i lowkey want to just go for a few hours drive in my RX but i unfortunately cant ๐ฆ
I haven't really tested it extensively, but I think jamming the throttle in park will keep the engine running
Why cant you go cruising? Did the RX break?
Fair enough, lmao
At least with the RX-7, it's worth the cost to go cruising. The Prius you can just go cruise cause you get 50mpg
I might give it a shot. Should go below 32 this week for the lows.
?
o
Go for a drive?
yes
Ah
would prob be a nice in the corolla
handles fairly well id imagine and gets 89239472893 mpg
Even for my amateur self, halfway decent photos at night
Nah, the Prius gets more mpg than that, lmfao
โพ๏ธ mpg
I need to find fun roads for the RX-7. Most local roads are boring as fuck or scary cause dense traffic and blind corners
And often times the roads with good curves are like 25mph too
So they're super lame
1st gear is 30mph
same, but it rarely dips into 1st
Automatic bad
automatic easy*
This true
automatic is good for a stupid american like me that can't drive
just learn to drive, ezpz
Be me and get a second car
cant
No money, or no space
insurance for our family is already absolutely insane
3800$ every 6 months iirc
Jesus fuck
2700$ of which is just my RX
HOW?
Because I am "A dangerous demographic" and "Exceptionally high risk"
that's like 4x as much as the Prius
also they put a penalty for "Excessive power" and "All-Wheel-Drive Surcharge"
If not more
WTH???????
no tickets or accidents
Excessive power?!
apparently
You're getting fucked by that company
Yeah
Straight up the ass
AWD surcharge?!?!?!
yes
they claim its statistically proven to incrase accidents because you aren't as careful
Yea, that sounds like some fishy af bullshit
usaa
Wot?
Get rid of them
I have USAA and it's great
keep in mind i'm only 17,
Still
they said we can renegotiate when I turn 26
I love my State Farm agent
Hes super nice
Even when I was 17, my parents didn't get fucked
Renegotiate at 26......
This a bunch of bullshit
we did call and clarify that I'm allowed to drive our other cars, though it's discouraged
The hell?
Wtf
You have a sketchy agent
since the explorer/taurus have 365hp
considering they tried to blame my dad when we got rear ended, yeah
when we were stopped for a school bus, got hit at 60mph by a cadillac deville blah blah blah
I've told the story before
My experience with USAA has been 12/10, never had a problem and they've always taken care of me. I have good rates, all that jazz.
My parents also have USAA and never had a problem. Idk what their rates are, but they're definitely not outrageous
our rates are insane
Whoever the hell is your agent shouldn't work for them, cause that's all bullshit
thats why I can't get another car
Yea, understandable
Is there a cancellation fee?
I'm scared to think how expensive its going to be when I upgrade cars
Cause you need to dump that agent
because it's only liability right now
and if I got a G70, it'd be comprehensive
I think my rates are $800 for the 6 month premium. Both cars. Both on comprehensive with $500 deductible
I pay full coverage for the truck
650-ish for my car.
I think I'd be somewhere around $650 with just the Prius
I pay $85 a month for full coverage
idk what our deductible is, but i do konw that comprehensive was high enough that it was';t worth doing for my RX that's valued by kbb at 800 bucks
My deductible is $500
Comprehensive was like $2 more on the 7, so I figured what the hell
oh I was wrong.
