#cars
1 messages · Page 256 of 1
I think it's running lights, because the DRLs are going to be a different part of that
?
Most want the headlights to be off, and just have the running lights on for the DRLs.
interesting
We want just the swoopy bits dammit.
running lights vs DRLs must have changed definitions since I last checked
ah, okay
but idk for sure
The swoops bits are technically called the parking lights.
parking lights are running lights, by the technical definition, iirc
yea, that's what I thought
okay, we're on the same page, lol
"parking lights" are what I call running lights
and DRLs are the automatic lights that the car decides to turn on during the day
right
I call them running lights because I drive with them on all the time
the Prius, I literally never turn them off
I leave em off.
I use them in an effort to make myself more visible to other drivers
parking lights usually run some amber bulbs up front, and run the taillights in the back
I leave em off since my car dims all the screens inside when I turn em on.
Which is annoying.
ah, see the Prius has a manual override for the dash brightness
which is why I can run them all the time
I could adjust the brightness, but I find it annoying to do that again when the sun sets.
I'm a set it and forget it kinda guy.
I have a little knob
so there's no effort
and the RX-7 I can run the parking lights all the time because I can turn off the dash lights during the day and then turn them on during the night
the only thing I can't adjust with parking lights on in the RX-7 is the clock display brightness, which is why I don't often run those lights midday
mainly due to the fact that I have to look down at the clock, which conflicts when the sun shines down on it
also not sure if my car does this.
But a lot of cars right now turn off a DRL when you use a turn signal.
Which is why I don't run DRLs.
yea
And I sincerely doubt any number of lights would have helped.
what really pisses me off though, is when I'm stopped on an uphill slope for a red light, and some dumbass pulls up super close to me while I'm in the RX-7
like, bruh
You gotta be a pro.
I'm gonna roll backwards when the light turns green
right after I had just gotten the RX-7 running again, and was still learning manual (this was on the old dry rotted tires, so I didn't care), there was a guy who basically was touching my bumper at this stop light
I had no choice but to hard launch with the handbrake pulled or I would've rolled back into him
I've gotten better at driving standard, so it's less of a concern but I still get pissed when people do it
eh nobody has any respect for manual transmissions anymore
It's annoying for sure.
at this point, if I were to roll back into someone I'd argue that they were at fault for not giving me proper space
Even with brake hill assist it's annoying.
It's not an issue of respecting manuals.
It's just automatics aren't inferior any longer.
And they're hella convenient.
Sometimes my Prius doesn't have enough idle torque to move uphill, and I legit roll backwards; so I could argue the same thing in that car
in my mind, if I roll back into you, that's your fault for not being considerate for me or yourself
and if you take any damage, I ain't payin for that shit
Moving cars get assigned the blame for most collisions.
unfortunately
doesn't mean I won't fight it
cause there are some things you can't help, such as rolling backwards
like, bitch, if I hit you while trying to get moving in first gear; you were waaaaaaaaaaaaay too fucking close
I've gotten significantly better, partially because we have some weird stop lights in my town
where you can basically be sitting at a 45 degree angle (almost)
I'm still not perfect, because I am slow to let off the clutch, but I'm not as worried about rolling into people anymore
reason I'm still pretty slow off the clutch is because I'm still a noob; but also because rotary life, no tork = rev high to move, and I don't want to let up too fast lest I stall or fucking jerk my way into a pathetic hard launch
Well... it's a start.
Ignoring the fact they're utterly absent in Alabama.
Still... a good start.
the only charging stations near me, that I know of, are at a "touristy" little town on my way to work and a few spots on campus at my school
actually, there might also be one downtown
Alabama is no better for Tesla superchargers tbh.
We have maybe 5 in the entire state?
None close to my house.
oh, this is not Tesla chargers
the only Tesla chargers I know of are on campus at the school my friend goes to and maybe one or two downtown
oh... wait. 7 super chargers and 3 more destination chargers.
I live in Ohio for context
Actually strike the Birmingham charger.
?
It's in a less than excellent part of town.
oof
oof
the only chargers I am aware of are in decent parts of town, if less than ideal
such as back corner of college campus
or Panera Bread/Whole foods parking lot
I think I'm gonna commit a mistake.
And go to that sketchy part of town tomorrow.
And see if the junk yard doesn't have an arm rest for a civic.
If you buy a car from a certain dealer in South Carolina, they'll include; An American flag, a Bible and an Ar-15

Skip, Skip, depends on who makes it.
god bless America
pogey
queue the bolt extractor kit
That's the average Tesla on delivery, yes
😂
How is that even possible?
So many questions right now.
iirc lady bought a tesla, floored it out of the shop, and tada
because
ya know
teslas are fqcking fast
and she probably had like a prius or something
people have the perception of EVs as being slow, ugly cars (first gen leaf)
2nd gen leaf is better
still flawed though
Imagine having less than 3 miles on your Tesla, then crashing it... Fat F
Meh, it's just a dishwasher 
Horsepower is overrated, car curb weights are far more important. Driving the 2019 Mazda Miata clears the mind on what's important. Subscribe for new videos ...
Watching this made me wonder if and when there's performance oriented hydrogen fuel cell cars? And like How'd you tune one to make more power?
Increase motor output.
My understanding is the fuel cells charge a small battery, and all goes from there.
You but eventually you'd have to have the fuel cell create more power
And How'd that be done? And what would result of that? More heat and hydrogen/oxygen consumption and more water to shed?
Dealerships are a pain in the ass
I don't think you can upgrade fuel cells.
Then again the same issues face high performance electrics.
Battery generates a lot of heat.
Leaked image of me at work
Maybe there aren't any ways now, like there weren't many when the ottomotor came to be
Sweet desktop bro
oh yeah. Teslas cook memory chips.
“They are replacing many units at service centers, and unfortunately, the computer goes to waste when only a replacement chip is necessary.”
So Tesla's approach to automotive repairs is no different than legacy automakers.
Arguably worse since automakers usually implement a fix.
It would be easier if you could just turn logging off.
Tesla should know better, and implement a permanent fix.
Yes, but this is cheap to make (:
Any other brand would provide a recall, and change the chip by a larger one and/or software update
Tesla be like adding features no one asked for, but leaving software which will brick your car (:
they'll never learn will they
Why on Gods green earth are they using eMmc in a 120k car anyways? Should be at least high end MLC.
Probably price
That's ridiculous
They fairly recently redesigned the MCU, it better have had better flash in it.
Compared to the replacement cost of teh entire unit, a few MLC chips are not that much more expensive than a eMMC chip
If the emmc is $2 cheaper and you're making 1 million cars, it adds up
yes, but then you have to replace a ton of MCUs which I bet costs more than 2$
But Tesla isn't paying for that 😉
That would be forward thinking to do that :p
I still think thats a bad place to cut costs
Ofcourse it is
Usually tesla is good about making robust tech, if less than stellar build quality
Apparently this is an exception
Maybe it's better than saving $2 on airbaigs or breaks
Not what I meant
I find it more often than not that car makers save money on something for a reason
Maybe just don't save that $2, even if that means selling the car for $50 more
^^^^^
Not to make more money, but for something beneficial
I'd pay an extra 50 bucks to get solid storage instead of shit sandwiches
And it's something every Model S/X will suffer from sooner or later Pogey
what does an MCU cost from Tesla, like 8k?
$4k for parts and labor iirc
huh, not as bad as j thought
tru
prove that he is
are the new cars still using emmc?
(all cars use it yes)
Then the problems aren't going to go away, unless he does away with logging.
Yea, they've been changing the software on the cars since their inception
Yes, but Tesla wants your data thus they can't just not log cars anymore
so... until they upgrade to a real storage solution, its not truly fixed.
what do you mean "a real storage solution"
A dram-inclusive SSD with wear leveling.
If they're going to pile data on and off of it, it needs to be durable.
I guarantee there is wear leveling on their current setup
Clearly not effective enough, or not spread over enough emmc flash chips
If you still did not understand what happens, every Tesla has an MCU, or media control unit. Version 1, also called MCUv1, equipped Tesla Model S and Model X units up to 2018.
This design of controller isn't being used anymore either
I know that all Teslas have MCUs...
If they resolved the issue, great.
But if not, thats something that needs to be rectified.
well, we haven't been seeing problems yet on the new units so...
Thats because they're still new..
and haven't had time for the solid state storage to degrade
sure, so we'll see pretty soon whether or not they also have a problem
Well the Model S/X units also worked fine the first couple of years ;)
That specific fault didn't occur yet* xD
Oh yeah the LCD bubbling thing was a big problem too
Yes
now that one was just embarassing
It were only 6 figure cars, can't expect too much ofc
totally
20y/o LCD is fine in a 40k car (new price)
Tesla Model S screeen bubbling and leaking literally all over the floor
Yes
(yes, I know. different kinds of screens. Still.)
Still, it's the only screen I've ever seen in a car, or even anywhere, which did that
I've seen a couple laptops and stuff that have problems
its the glue in the screen going to sh*t
Oof never seen it in laptops
was an older Dell laptop
from their shitty-period
They used to be good, then went bad for a number of years, and recently have really fixed stuff up and improved their act
3 years old now
yeah that one is fine
the more recent Dells are decent
HP is bottom of the stack now imo
glances at my Microsoft Surface and MacBook Air
I have weird tastes
Yes (:
It's this one, but then a fancier spec pogey
Dell's Inspiron line of laptops isn't exactly known for its gaming prowess... But today my preconceived notions were challenged in a big way! Cooler Master l...
thats not bad
i7 vs i5, 16GB vs 8GB, SSD vs SSHD, 4K touch vs 1080p
damn, not bad at all
Only $1100/€1100 so amazing value
Oof lol
Surface has 4gb RAM and i5 4300u + 128gb SSD
MacBook has 4gb RAM and i5 3427u + 256gb
I can't survive with 4GB of RAM
Might I add that MacOS handles less ram FAR more gracefully than windows?
Yes I'm aware if that
Like.... I don't hardly have to change my usage patterns going from 32gb on my desktop to 4 on there. all the chrome tabs
really kind of surprised how far 4gb goes on macos
Well for basic browsing stuff it should be enough (:
I do lots of chrome tabs, music, email, eclipse/intellij, word, etc
all at once
and its fine
I crashed our iMac with 4GB of RAM while rendering a video 😄
Rip
I've not tried editing anything on it cause I have better computers for that
worst case I'd grab my windows laptop
(ZenBook UX 330 UA - Core i5 7200u, 8gb RAM)
Or just ya kno... use my desktop
Well the video was on there so made sense, even if it took longer... But it crashed mid render xD
> having a desktop
I don't have such luxury
(:
No space/use for it
I have... An Xbox with a 4k tv, does that count? xD
Anyway we're getting kinda offtopic xD
a lil bit
I wish the 3900x wasn't so damn expensive though 0.o
Otherwise I'd upgrade
Still a capable CPU
ye
i have a mild all core OC on it up to 3.8
mines not a crazy overclocker
if I oc the cores, memory won't go over 2666 with all 4 sticks
If I leave the cores stock, it will hit 3000
with only 2 i can hit 3200 (rated speed of RAM) but then I'm stuck with 16gb of RAM
while overclocked*
you tryna get banned mk? ;p
Yeah Ryzen did some weird stuff with RAM speeds ;)
And the only ban emojis in comments, atleast that's what they"ve done so far ;) Not reactions
Anyway it's 12.30 AM, so I'm going to hit the hay stuck_out_tongue
goodnight.
yes, we just got off topic lool
can relate
Just to go back to the Tesla thing. Tesla has implemented all the usual things that solid state drives have. Problem was they did away with any buffer for wear leveling thanks to massive updates they implemented on top of logging. The chips were doing things no one expected them to do. So it was an 8 gig drive with only 8 gigs of total actual storage to work with. There was no redundancy... not that it would have helped. The constant writing/overwriting cycle is killing memory chips inside the warranty... All you do with a larger chip is delay the failure.
As for proving if Musk is bullshitting with his tweets....
He was sued by the SEC over a tweet.
multiple times*
And he's facing a defamation suite over that Thai cave rescue thing.
Or at least got his arse in trouble
Those were all tweets.
that too
Also I'm sure I could find tweets where he promised full production of the Model 3 before 2017 ended.
Which never happened. In fact saying the Model 3 launched in Q3 of 2017 is like saying that Nvidia announcing a new GPU is a 'launch.'
ecksdee
They delivered how many cars again? A dozen in august?
didn't they sell like 200 Model 3s in 2017?
30 cars i think at their "event"
Model 3 kind of has flopped so far... hopefully sales pick up as they sort shit out
All the bad quality stuff - they
oh?
ford f150 sold over a million both times
explorer sold like a million each time
each year*
Let's look at it like this.
The Mazda 3 sold half that amount in 2018.
The CX-5 barely outsold the Model 3.
Also the model 3 is handily getting its ass beat by the volvo (mks fanboy car), etron, ipace is meh
etc
theyre similar performance but way better quality
that merc eqc is sh*t though
I would NOT call a modern Volvo good.
Their new 4 cylinders have been universally panned.
Good looking, sure.
mk loves the polestar stuff
But the tech used has been clunky.
tesla is gonna go completely irrelevant in Europe if mk is to be believed, that ionity is getting bigger than SC network
And all the competition in the electric car space doesn't perform as well as Tesla.
but do they have the reliability, quality and customer service issues of tesla?
vw doesn't even make electric cars do they?
In the case of JLR... Tesla is vastly better.
VW does a few electrics.
If you call the California special eGolf an electric car.
I don't.
i forgot about the egolf
Dedicated electric cars... I'd rather have a Tesla.
Cause all of them have/will have issues.
You'd take a Model 3 over an E-Tron?
At least Tesla is built in the US.
At this point?
Yeah I would.
If I can afford an electric car... I'm going for the max novelty... and max range.
etron is going to have a real service network, better interior, better reliability, etc. Model 3 will be faster and have slightly better range
We don't know about better reliability.
And interior is highly subjective.
Audis have always been a bit sterile to me.
i've not heard of total failure of motors/batteries/interior functions like i have about model s in particular
How long?
if tesla could get their head out of their ass i'd love to have one but as of now... I'd never actually buy one.
I have yet to see VW take their head out of theirs.
I don't want to be stranded on the side of the road then be without my car for 6 months
A decade of lying and bullshitting consumers...
The fact they did away with the 7 year warranty recently...
They've delayed the new gen Golf because they were having software issues.
That's on top of VW's less than stellar reputation in the US of building cheap cars that are expensive to repair.
at least you can fix a VW yourself/ buy parts/rebuild one without being blacklisted from the network
Parts aren't cheap.
cheap or not you can't even get most of the parts for Teslas
they give rebuilders a big fat fuck you
And do you really think you'll be anymore able to fix a buggy E-Tron than a Model S?
I doubt audi will be as anal about selling parts
No, just charge you 3 times more.
I'd maybe consider the Audi... if it had an extra 100 miles of range.
The Model 3 is cheaper, longer legged, is currently a known factor.
Build quality issues aside... which I'm assuming Tesla is working out... The Model 3 is the easy choice.
Unless you must have a crossover thing... in which case the Mercedes is a better choice.
The EQC?
yep
it's a steaming pile of (ugly) crap
doesn't it only get like... 150 miles of range?
259
is that WTLP/EPA?
yes
so half that
Audi's is 239
lol
I see no reason at all to spend more than 40 grand on an electric car.
roasting your battery isn't fun
the leaf doesn't have active cooling
otherwise it'd be fine
Nor is spending 80k on a car that will be obsolete within 2 years.
Good luck on doing that with any electric that isn't a Tesla in the US.
I mean even a tesla is impractical for road trips in the us
better than nothing, but theres not enough superchargers yet
not even close
triple the number of them and then you're getting close i'd think
to having enough to only have to make minimal plans
300 miles is the absolute minimum in the US for an electric car.
I meant adding more superchargers
At least if I was to own only one car.
isn't ionity not gonna even bother to build out a network in the US?
theyre europe only?
Otherwise I'm using the car as a commuter pod, and a Leaf will suffice.
I guess Ionity is fine being a big fish in a small pond.
Meaning the US will continue to be dominated by Tesla.
I hate to agree with Arial, but the price is killing me.
110k or something
It's 180k.
With how much range?
1 sec
Cause the top nacho is already down in the P100.
So Porsche still has to beat Tesla's 350 mile range.
Still bloody expensive but at least similar pricing to a P100D
though slightly worse performance (if it even matters at this point)
Model S is 370 isn't it?
I'm seeing 350ish, but if its 370... that's 20 miles more the Porsche has to go to impress me.
i mean thats the reason the Model X is so ...polarizing.. is the aero
I don't mind the looks but some people think its ass ugly
And some people will find the Taycan disgusting.
I think the taycan looks nice
Personally I'm disgusted by their naming scheme.
What the fuck is a Taycan
oh
And where is the bloody turbo?
also jaguar is a bit of an idiot
they named a crossover the E-Pace and their EV the I-Pace
uhhh
should have named the Electric the E-Pace
I think the British trying to make an electric car is adorable.
It's like a kid trying to do advanced physics with a crayon.
The British are legendary at being bad with electronics.
lol
So far they're living up to their reputation.
I'm curious to see what Honda and Toyota will cough up.
honda is planning to sell the e
just
e
hasn't toyota said no all electrics?
only hybridization and hydrogens?
They're playing it safe for now.
There isn't enough of a demand for electrics.
Tesla is powered by memes.
somehow I recall toyota execs saying that EV is a failed tech and hydrogen is the true future or whatever
no wonder theyre shitty quality
VAG is powered by dieselgate.
That leaves JLR and Nissan.
Nissan is half assing it for now.
And I have no clue why Jaguar released an electric.
because jaguar isnt long for this world
Range Rover / Land Rover is doing alright, but Jaguar is doing very badly
I think they were expecting electrics to take off in 2017.
That leaves Ford and GM.
I've seen 10-20 E-Trons and hundreds, if not thousands of Teslas
Ford makes an EV!
The Ford Focus Electric....
Honestly I'd put more faith in Toyota than Ford right now.
Toyota is going down the wrong path with hydrogen
i see them fairly often actually lol
but I live in an area where theres lots of EVs so
Hydrogen fuel cells are just an alternative battery.
oh right theres the Hyundai Ioniq EV
which is a pretty damn good little car from what I've heard
Hydrogen is an EV with extra steps
Cause everything after that... Toyota is just a generic EV.
Ioniq is blah.
Interior quality is like a last gen Civic.
my friend has the 2018 civic and its not half bad wym?
its surprisingly nice inside actually
2018 is current.
i thought they refreshed it this year
I'm talking about the turd Honda squeezed out in 2012.
A refresh isn't a generational jump.
They changed a bumper... big whoop
The 2008 was the one before that.
I don't mind the design, but the interior material quality was about on par with the Ioniq today.
Aggressively unimpressive.
Perhaps the electric is better than the hybrid Ioniq.
But I stand by what I said.
Impressed I am not.
Dunno... 90s and early 2000s Honda was fairly good on quality.
mine has squeaks and rattles
My 01 accord had soft touch surfaces.
some parts of mine are soft touch, some parts (under the screen and stuff) are just plastic
which is kind of disappointing in a (converted for inflation) 65k car
Some people hav e said the wood is real
I'm skeptical
I wonder if its possible to fix the rattles...
Depends on the rattles.
My fix was to wedge a piece of folded up paper in the squeaky bit.
That actually worked.
Looked stupid, but it worked.
your brand new corolla has rattles?
nah, this was my Accord.
oh ok good
Metis is silent for now.
My moms explorer has a rattle in the buttons on the door -.-
like the seat memory buttons
if you put your hand on it, it stops
Ignoring the screaming of the lane departure when I fall asleep mid drive.
(I don't do that, it's a joke.)
I got close to rear ending someone today, they decided to lock em' up to try and make a turn
damn people, just go to the next spot and turn around
I had to seriousyl step on the brakes. Annoying.
anyways
I need to take apart my dash and replace my air mix servo soon
its making bad noises that are getitng worse, aka its gonna die soon
good luck
should be fairly straightforward, just gotta take out glovebox and cd changer which I've done before
Woah more propaganda
😂
anything wrong with what he's saying tho? @stoic ledge
Tesla delivered a total of 245,240 vehicles in 2018
yes
They're off by a factor of two on cars delivered.
/Second, they are the only company that has a global charging infrastructure for their cars, meaning people can actually travel in their cars and not just have daily commuter cars like what every other EV on the road is basically limited to./
Global is being super generous here. They have the most wide spread, but global is a bit of a reach.
I've seen several non Tesla ones tho
I've seen only non-tesla chargers in Japan.
But I didn't go out of my way to find super chargers... so take my experience with a grain of salt.
Can't speak for the NHTSA stats. I wasn't aware they release the full statistics.
Either way. It tops the charts, so that's a plus.
/Fifth, all Tesla cars produced today have all the hardware required for full self-driving. Each car has a suite of sensors and cameras, along with an industry-leading ASIC computer to process data and relay controls to the car, more info here:/
Highly arguable.
gross profit margin
Big freaking deal.
Doesn't matter if you are overall losing money.
in the hundreds of millions
Dunno about #8.
Large scale batteries have been deployed in Australia... so yay?
/Ninth, Elon predicts that Tesla will be producing 1.5 million cars in 2021 and 3 million cars in 2023./
Tesla predicted 5000 cars a week in 2017.
And then predicted 250k a year sold for the Model 3... ?
Predictions into the future are ballsy. It's stupid imo.
Do it, don't promise it.
Elon musk has a LONG track record of overpromising and under delivering
Tenth, and probably last for now, Tesla cars are just the most fun to drive.
Take his estimations, cut them in half, and you're usually right in line with reality
Is mazda really in that much trouble?
I see a ton of their cars
like
everywhere
They've had 5 years to capitalize on the crossover boom.
CX3,5,7 aren't crossovers?
CX9 is probably midsize
CX-9 isn't popular... or very good.
fair enough
oh
they sure seem to sell a LOT of them though
then again my little corner of the US isn't really representative of the midwest & shit
so
Not sure why, but Birmingham is a nexus for Teslas.
idk I see way too many exotics in my area
and I dont even live in a huge city
but like
we've seen Ford GT, McLaren 720s, many Lamborghinis and Ferraris, GT-Line porsches, all sorts of stuff
which you'd think would be limited to the big cities (la, miami, etc)
(Even saw a LaFerrari once)
Its just flat out weird.
and yes, I'm 6 years old and still point out exotics.
aren't we all?
fair enough
lol
we chased down an R63 to get a picture once
damn cool car
(again, my weird taste in cars)
Great idea
How would they make it strong enough to handle it's 1500 horse power engines torque
Like the engine will break the car structure
@fathom socket I mean, it's Mr. B is for Build.
Considering his other projects, he will figure something out.
And considering there are Huracán's with 3000+ WHP, pretty sure the structure is quite solid.
.stuck_out_tongue.
Oof the dual motor Tesla is one fast boi
pogey Volvo XC40 P8, electrified XC40 with 408hp pogey
The Volvo XC40 P8 Recharge is the Swedish brand's first ever fully electric car, and we've got everything you need to know about it
€59.900, ± the same as the Model 3 LR and Polestar 2, ± same specs pogey
Dutch price R-Design (just like the P8) T5 (250ph): €59.990
Dutch price R-Design T5 Twin Engine (182hp + 82hp = 262hp): €50.495
P8 pricing is not that bad (:
.pogey.

This is the new 2019 Mercedes-Maybach S650. And this one has a little twist, bringing its final price to 400,000 dollars. Thanks to INKAS, we got the exclusi...
I forgot. Mercedes still does V12s.
Century has better styling.
Not a V12 anymore though.
I'd take the Toyota.
Those kind of cars are mostly meant to be enjoyed in the back, while I'd rather drive myself
Take your pick.
The Toyota has that weird seat cloth, right?
Then I guess BMW 7 series?
Used to be wool.
Never accused you of hating.
Hating is easy enough to tell apart from calling something weird.
Like me hating on Elon Musk.
But that is a story for another time.
They're the best part of the car.
I'm not a fan of current Mercedes design language.
Hopefully the next generation will get back to being nice.
Unlike the last... 3 generations? 🤔
Much as I love conventional design, I find Mercedes to be just... bland. Especially compared to the current 7 series and A8.
The A8 is bland too pogey
It has lines.
Which is more than the doughy shape of Mercedes can attest to.
Somehow it works better with Mazda.
That or I'll also find those cars bland in a year.
@dense shard if you read what the guy said, he gave the 400k number based on q3 production rates and extrapolating them.
Global in that it's in north america, europe, asia, australia, where people are buying Teslas, and they're continuing to expand.
What's arguable about the ASIC computer?
#8 didn't reference the Australia battery at all...
Number 9 is saying that they are going to massively expand their battery production and likely become one of the largest producers relatively soon. Even if they are below the quoted numbers they will still be pumping out a lot of cars and a lot of batteries in 4 years.
I'm not arguing about the computer.
I'm arguing that Tesla will be able to be fully self driving.
And I agree that it rips apart the teslaq (short seller) position on tesla because it means Tesla stock is going to continue to grow, meaning shorts are going to lose more and more money
Fully self driving means under any and all conditions regardless of context.
Tesla shares fell nearly 6% in after market trading on the news.
Tesla shares fall on occasion which is all you need for short sellers.
Ok, level 5 yea will be difficult to reach and will probably take decades
But L4 is pretty close
And the 400k number assumes the that Q4 of Tesla will see 160k cars being produced.
60k more than Q3.
Global also includes South America and Africa.
No, it's saying that q3 they made almost 100k cars
Tesla doesn't seem to have a presence there.
So annualized that's 400k
Yes cause very few people in 3rd world countries can afford a tesla
Assuming the 99000 number holds up for Q3.
Or a normal car
It's global where there are EVs
That's disingenuous.
No
Not at all
You don't get to claim you are global when you are known on 5 of the 7 continents.
Mr. Worldwide isn't.
And pumping anything out in 4 years is still up in the air considering Tesla spent the last 3 years with only months of cash on hand.
At this point no one knows if GM and Ford will be around in 4 years.
And they have years of cash on hand rn
uhuh
Yes, thanks for proving my point.
Entire world.
That does mean everything.
Not almost.
Yep, so the use works
not really
Yep
Involving the entire world means involving Africa and South America.
Nope
Relating to entire world doesn't require those continents
ENTIRE world.
You know why World War II was a global war?
Because it included all the continents.
Doesn't require those continents
It does.
No it didn't lol
As much as you want to ignore Africa and South America.
They are part of the global economy.
There weren't any conflicts in south america
And I doubt any South Africans here would take kindly to being excluded from the "entire world."
Uhhh...
How is it global
There were.
Global; relating or involving the entire world
5 out of 7 continents != Entire world
You're missing a continent
Which one?
SA
Yep
nope
Where
Oh look. A French Colony that was involved.
oh wait... you want more?
Involved in a pretty big fiasco in Uruguay in the start of the war.
Falklands were a British Colony, and were involved.
South America was involved.
If we want to be super pedantic.
Yep never a war there
Antarctica was also involved to a limited extent.
What
South America had war there.
French colont never fought
Literally just sat there
Then later said that they wanted to be independent
Not relevant.
And had a movement for it
Before 1945 they were colonies under the rule of France.
Lmao that's the only thing wikipedia talks about it
so it didn't fight in the war
The colonies sent thousands if not millions of troops to the frontlines.
You know why Britain was able to hold the Germans at bay in Africa?
Citation needed that south america got involved
Cause they drew heavily on their colonial armies in India and the middle east.
Boom. here
Cause I know a lot of them stayed neutral
A lot, but not all.
"During World War II and the fall of France to German forces, Félix Éboué was one of the first to support General Charles de Gaulle of Free France, as early as June 18, 1940. Guiana officially rallied Free France in 1943. It abandoned its status as a colony and once again became a French department in 1946."
If you want citations out of a book. I'll need a month and 100 dollars.
Yea, that's a protest movement
uhuh
Not joining the war
Much like the Polish underground army was a protest.
The Polish Underground was an uprising?
Or civil resistance
The Polish Underground was a civil resistance?
The Polish Underground was formed after German and the Soviet Union invaded.
WhatTheFuckDidYouJustSay emote time 3
Careful, might get banned @tropic silo
The Government in Exile.
Fuck
.puggers.
Ok, this is really far from what we were originally talking about
Was the legitimate government of Poland.
You decided to dismiss my country's efforts against Germany and Russia.
It was not a civil resistance.
All this for Tesla, huh.
It was a war. Where losing meant total destruction.
If you don't like the use of the term global to describe Tesla's charging infrastructure, that's fine
HAHAHA
Because it's fucking wrong.
Is this all about Tesla?
Of course it is.
Kind of semantical but if you wanna be stuck up about it that's ok
@eager kite boi stop sucking Tesla's dick. It isn't gonna make you a better person nor make Tesla a better brand
I'm just not sure why you aren't willing to accept that pro Tesla tweets are full of it.
@tropic silo nou
Everyone knows Tesla is never wrong.
Everyone knows Tesla is one of the worlds wonders.
Elon Musk is god.
At least to someone in here.
.KEK.
Hopefully Elon Musk ends up paying millions to that one British diver.
Maybe he'll learn he isn't a god.
And actions have consequences.
But yea, the 400k number is an annualized rate based on q3 production
uhuh
I'll believe it when I see it.
And I haven't seen it ever with Tesla.
They over promise, under deliver.
Ok so if I get straight F's the entire year, but an A+ in Q3, my entire years performance is A+?
Good to know
Arial, pls stop talking. You are pretty annoying. I'm sure multiple people agree
If tesla over promises and underdelivers I bet you're really upset about the taycan
I couldn't care less.
Oh
Piech didn't go around calling heroes pedophiles.
Porsche isn't the subject here.
Telsa is.
So when tesla "over promises and under delivers" it's bad but when porsche does it's fine
Got it
What about the Taycan should upset me?
Where did they promise a better car?
source me
Mission E
I mean, Taycan is a different thing.
No, taycan is the production of the mission e
What did the Taycan not deliver which they promised on forehand?
They show us mission e and say that they're going to produce an ev like this
As we stated before, Taycan has the price it has because Porsche CAN charge that.
They have history, and has built up a prestige.
Tesla could probably charge similar prices in the future once they have gotten some history.
They did produce an EV similar to the Mission E.
But in reality we just get the taycan
Taycan is a fine car.
Nowhere near as good as the mission e was claimed to be
I would buy the Taycan, but not for the performance.
I would buy it because it's a PORSCHE.
And remember how Tesla promised to make 5000 cars a week in 2017?
And how that didn't happen until over a year later?
It's all about branding.
https://topgear.nl/app/uploads/2018/03/porsche-mission-e-productieversie-6.jpg
It looks quite like the Taycan? Concepts are never 1:1 to a production cars
With everyone on meth and coffee?
It only works for a month.
Aw man.
Then you burn out.
They never promised 5k cars a week in 2017 wtf
Nowhere near as good as the mission e was claimed to be
How is it not as claimed? I'm seriously wondering what item them promised and didn't deliver
.sad_emoji.
Mission E specs never delivered @stoic ledge
"Tesla's Model 3 website originally envisioned a Model 3 production capacity of 5,000 vehicles per week by the end of 2017, but the company has pushed that projection back to the first quarter of 2018 while it deals with bottlenecks. Musk, on a shareholder call, estimated this ramp to be complete late in Q1, likely March."
Also Tesla "concepts" are always basically 1:1 on production
Not cited
🤔
LOL
As far as I can found, Porsche promised 600+hp, 250kW charging, 800V, 0-60 in 3.5s
They delivered on all those, so idk what not
I'm assuming with consistent panels gaps.
tesla versus porsche
only gonna be 1 winner there pal
VW doesn't care about winning.
idc what u think either
They only reason they built the Taycan, E-Tron, and iD cars is because of dieselgate.
Otherwise we'd be looking at another diesel hybrid V16 monstrosity out of Audi.
Source, Arial?
Cause they did promise that.
And they did deliver it... so if you have alternative information... please show us.
how about Taycan news?
Under 3 sec 0-100kph
Not the concept?
We need news about the production car here.
You need to prove the production car failed to deliver.
Ok, production car can't charge at 350kw
citation?
hmmmm... how about a website that doesn't have Tesla stock?
Only turbo S gets better acceleration than mission e
but i'd still take the taycan over the shitbox tesla any day of the week 
All other models get worse acceleration
By 2021 at the latest, peak charging power is set to increase from 250 to 350kW, which should – in combination with those latest 800-volt charge points – reduce charging time to a swift 14 minutes.
But 350kW charging is stated to be coming 2021?
Production =/= promises
Just applying your logic here.
Okay, and your point?
You aren't being consistent
Sure I am.
You either are changing your views
Or you're not being consistent
@wheat hatch your name is fitting
So what I said earlier... when I said the concept isn't the production... but you implied otherwise...
Thank you, lmao
Oh, because porsche was promising us that the Mission E would come to production
Obviously not that exact car
no shit?
But a car that performed like it
The Mission E is a concept.
Everything about the Taycan is worse
91 Likes, 12 Comments - @weissachpassion on Instagram: “Since you really liked the Dragrace between the Taycan and the P100D 🏁, here is the handling…”
subjective
No
Everything?
uhhh
also to taycan weighs a lot more than the tesla
I've heard the Taycan has better handling.
