#cars
1 messages · Page 247 of 1
analysts have no idea what they are talking about like 90% of the time
Dude Tesla has over 5 billion in the bank
You're talking like a tesla fanboy.
they could pay off all their debt tomorrow if they wanted to
but they don't want to
Yes, for building factories
so no, theyre DEEP in debt
If they wanted to be profitable, they wouldn't of taken the loans
They've been 5 months from shutting down for the last 2 years...
^
they wouldn't have put themselves in debt
at one point they were like 2 weeks from shutdown
they are doing it so they can expand even more
I get they're trying to grow.
But maybe Elon shouldn't be promising profit in the next quarter every quarter.
He literally hasn't
yes he has.
Nope
Can you show me the quotes from the earnings calls where he says it?
Do you own Tesla shares?
Will probably get some soon though
Okay... you want a direct quote from Musk?
“What drives us is our mission to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable, clean energy, but we will never achieve that mission unless we eventually demonstrate that we can be sustainably profitable,” he writes in a company email. “That is a valid and fair criticism of Tesla’s history to date.”
I'm too risk averse to invest in Tesla.
(that being said I own AMD soo....)
Eventually demonstrate we can be sustainably profitable
So in other words, show we can be profitable
not that they need to stay profitable forever after that...
Why on earth
Also just a fyi
would you go profitable
Publicly traded companies aim to be profitable.
They have to answer to investors.
Because they don't want or need to stay profitable
Elon promised the Model 3 would hit full production in 2017. It didn't.
He promised Tesla would eventually become profitable.
When you're building out a massive factory in China, that takes a lot of money
the Model 3 is a great car but it failed at it's goal
it's very hard to still report a profit while dumping hundreds of millions in CAPEX
It failed to make Tesla profitable, it failed to be popular and get lots of people to buy it, it failed to hit the 35k price point, and it failed to ever hit full production
I love the car but its not a success
They were profitable in Q3 and Q4 of last year...
No... I think they finally hit full production this year.
so, no, it did make them profitable
It took em... years.
They said 10k
2 quarters.
in 2018
Does not make for a profitable company.
I'm sure AMC turned a profit once in the 70.
I think they crested 7?
Where they promising 10? Damn.
they were saying 5k initially then ramping to 10
as far as I know they never hit 10
I know they fueled the push to 6 with meth, cocaine, and 4loko.
in 2017*
And probably some very inspiring music.
And the reason they aren't hitting 10K is because GA3 kinda failed
But Eye of the Tiger on loop has a limited effect.
the Model 3 in general failed at it's goal
They didn't hit 10k because they physically can't.
So right now GA4 is the one producing the majority of the cars they are producing
and eventually they are going to transition GA3 over to the GA4 design, but that takes money and time which are the 2 things they are diverting to China right now to make Gigafactory 3
Because China might give them just enough profit to see the Tesla truck.
oh China is gonna give them hella profit
uhuh
Do you think the Roadster is ever gonna show up? I kinda doubt it
they cant sink billions of dollars into a useless and low volume car
Will it be a swansong... why not.
Like don't get me wrong I really like Tesla cars but wow... the company is VERY mismanaged and is falling apart at the seams
yeeeep
Lot more expensive to produce a Model 3 in the middle of California than in China...
Labor, shipping, taxes...
so gross profits will be even better on China produced 3s
Don't blame known factors on failure to perform.
Cause taxes and shipping had nothing to do with failed production figures.
Maybe they shouldn't rush?
Which was solved when they made the GA4 line
It wasn't about rushing, it was about trying to automate too many tasks
Like that literally was the problem
They tried to make a robot which would lay a piece of foam insulation over the battery pack
And the tent assembly line with janky solutions wasn't a massively cut corner?
But the amount of work that would be needed for that robot would be insane
The paint is awful on Teslas
OSHA was called they cut so many corners.
A. W. F. U. L.
Interior is quite nice now tbh, but the paint quality is absolutely dreadful
So the primary reason why GA3 failed was due to overautomation
my 20 year old Lexus with the corresponding dents and dings are overall better paint than a BRAND NEW 100k Tesla
They've improved the panel gaps over the last few months
Panel gaps are within industry standards...
uhuh
A car at 40 grand should have very tight panel gaps.
Not "within industry standards."
They can improve, but theyre not the dreadful horribleness that people seem to say alot
Tell that to every entry luxury car manufacturer
If Toyota can do it at 20k... Doing it at 35k should be easy peasy.
uhhh
Toyota sent a benchmark on quality and consistency.
The Germans matched it.
Tesla loves comparing itself to the Germans.
I will compare them in turn.
Cause they're better
Except they're not.
My RX has less rattles than a Model X i rode in
and the Model X had less than 6k miles on it
Audi has rolled out Tier 3 automated driving tech. Tesla is at tier 2.
and my car is at 130k
I too love anecdotes
"cause they're better"
No car should leave the factory with that many rattles and squeaks and poor paint
Okay, give us objective proof Tesla is "better."
Tell me, what's the difference between level 2 and 3 autonomous driving? @dense shard
when theyre beat in quality on a car thats TWO DECADES older
Hands off operations.
nope
then what is it?
Level 2 ("hands off"): The automated system takes full control of the vehicle (accelerating, braking, and steering). The driver must monitor the driving and be prepared to intervene immediately at any time if the automated system fails to respond properly. The shorthand "hands off" is not meant to be taken literally. In fact, contact between hand and wheel is often mandatory during SAE 2 driving, to confirm that the driver is ready to intervene.
Level 3 ("eyes off"): The driver can safely turn their attention away from the driving tasks, e.g. the driver can text or watch a movie. The vehicle will handle situations that call for an immediate response, like emergency braking. The driver must still be prepared to intervene within some limited time, specified by the manufacturer, when called upon by the vehicle to do so.
Oh I was off a bit.
Level 3 is eyes off.
I don't think that Audi is full L3 on production cars
This is SAE btw.
Which is true of Teslas right now
but certainly between L2 and L3
yea really
kinda 2.5
prove it.
imo
2.5 is 2.
No anecdotes.
People have died.
that's a terrible way ti prove that
"Tesla vehicles are not considered fully autonomous, or Level 4, a designation by SAE that means the car can handle all aspects of driving in certain conditions without human intervention. Instead, Tesla vehicles are “Level 2,” a more advanced driver assistance system than most other vehicles on the road today."
from falling asleep with cheat devices
Autopilot works 95% of the time but that 5 percent is when you're utterly f*cked
Audi's new A8 is available with Level 3 in Europe.
What are those 5% of cases?
Audi isn't full L3.
Not safe enough to look away at your phone or whatever.
The SAE rating system is not very granular
Tesla isn't L3 either
Ok. at low speed traffic jams sure.
Once again. You don't need to BS the standards.
Last time I checked, Audis don't have enhanced summon, auto lane changing and maneuvering on the highway, on ramp to off ramp autopilot capabilities
Last I checked, SAE is an industry standard. Once applied to all automakers.
Let's skip all subjective... and stick to what the industry follows.
Just as with horsepower, torque, and whatever metrics we use.
Or in the case of the US... towing capacities.
duckpower
Enhanced summon is still something that no one else has
but it doesn't work properly
and auto lane change is still something that no one else has
and is incredibly slow
So a half assed feature is better than none.
It's still slow on an absolute scale.
and one which isn't on a private track with 0 people within half a mile of it
Well safe testing is nice.
sure
like .001% but yea
Hands off, not attention off.
^
Audis is supposedly to be eyes off as well.
x to doubt
Level 4 is where stuff gets fun.
in traffic maybe. I wouldn't take my eyes off at high speed
I totally believe L3 in slow to moderate traffic
(you also arent supposed to speed, modify your car, have your cellphone turned on while you're driving, etc.)
I'm pretty sure Tesla has clarified that after they distracted Elon Musk off twitter.
... uh yeah
I don't think audi is saying you should take your eyes off the road either
You AREN'T supposed to speed.
you aren't supposed be distracted.
What point are you making, Falcon?
I'm saying people are always going to do shit theyre not supposed to and thus systems should be overbuilt to an extent and derated to help prevent them getting dead
Or.
We could train drivers to git gud.
Over reliance on the systems will cause issues when they fail.
very true
and most companies are raising insurance rates
with the more safety tech and stuff
cause people pay less attention
And modern cars are dramatically more expensive to repair.
Cause on the road, there are fewer accidents than 20 years ago.
but theyre statistically more severe
News to me.
from what I understand, less fatalities and stuff but more severe damage
which is overall good
partly cause everyone drives so DAMN FAST now days
even less in an autonomous car
teslas aren't autonomous
not even close
won't be autonomous for at least 10 years
probably more like 25
ok, sorry I won't use that if it offends you, autopilot equipped car
autopilot isn't a misnomer but autonomous is
can't take a joke alright
What's the punchline again?
^proving my point
Sorry, it's just that jokes are usually funny.
Ah, here we go. We could just crack down on drunk driving.
Zero tolerance actually works wonders.
i hope you don't mean the zero tolerance rules for schools and stuff
those are just completely and utterly asinine
I mean that if you get caught drunk driving. There are actual punishments involved.
Skip the slap on the wrist.
If you think that autonomous driving is 10-25 years away, you are very out of touch with the tech industry
I'm talking where you get your ass beat by a bully at school and YOU get punished
They do have a BAC minimum. .03, but the cops can just call it good enough if they think you're under the effects.
speaking of safety, https://www.tesla.com/blog/model-3-earns-2019-iihs-top-safety-pick-award
Should be
from what I understand its a very safe car except the base models headlights kinda suck
the LED ones are good though.
NHTSA has not yet rated the Stinger.
At the rate they're depreciating, i'll be able to get one pretty damn soon
Man IIHS is pretty liberal on the amount of these top safety pick+ awards they give out
1yr old and half off lul.
There are a lot of safe cars out there.
Many have risen to the challenge.
Tesla isn't the only car at the top.
It's not even some unreliable shitty car - it's got a 10yr warranty, is reliable, good looking and safe and powerful, but its not an SUV so its not being bought and is depreciating like crazy
On the top for NHTSA testing
Actually, all 3 of Tesla's cars are at the top of NHTSA's testing
a 4 year old, 15k car sounds pretty damn good for me
So's my car.
with 365hp and AWD
Top safety pick, not top safety pick + 😉
My car misses out due to headlights.
In everything else it's just as good. 😜
And I save time refueling it.
the Stinger is a + with the right options
too bad toyota doesn't release the probability of injury data that NHTSA produces in their tests
just a top safety pick without some optoins
we could actually know what the difference is between cars
But we won't so I'll just assume it's hella safe.
Not as safe as Teslas
According to NHTSA it's the case
true true
with 0 maintenance?
im at 20 years and counting! 🙂
Yea, how many miles you at @indigo coral
130k
lol
After that... oil, a few other fluids.
really damn high lol
So tesla batteries are lasting literally hundreds of thousands of miles
on Model S and Xs
the model 3 has an even better battery pack..
so............
So are Toyota Corollas.
Sooo......
Most sold nameplate of all time.
with the bubbles and stuff
How much will you have to pay in maintenance for that toyota corolla?
over 300k miles
Probably not much.
Not as much as a new battery pack.
yea, only the price of the car likely
hmmm... nah
yea...
nah
especially if you're doing it at toyota dealerships
And if I'm not?
My RX has had nothing but scheduled/wear item maitnence over 20 years.
only way it's cheap is if you're doing it yourself
which most people don't do
because they don't know shit about cars
Oil changes over the 300k miles will be 1500 dollars.
Timing chain... maybe once?
Call it 3000 dollars.
4500 dollars.
since I got the car I had one check engine light, which was a fluke and has never come back since I cleared it.
uhhh... I ain't seeing a 'rolla out of 4500 dollars.
Fine let's toss in another 3000 dollars for other fluid changes.
And round it up.
$50 per oil change, even if you stretch your oil changes out to every 5k miles that's 3K right there
uhhh no
wym stretch it out
My car is 10k intervals.
my car is 5k
Average car is 5k miles
nyoom
I have 300 miles till its time for a new change on mine
4700 miles since the last one! 🙂
(I use TripB for that lol)
TripA for every fill up and calculating fuel economy, and TripB for oil changes.
For now I'm just rolling with the integrated trip computer.
It's pretty good so far.
my screen shows the average overall mpg but not the "since last fillup" one
oh and it shows the instant fuel economy
I actually got 24mpg on one tank!!
Yeah, that's pretty good.
Usually I get 19ish with just daily driving.
That's a lotta problems
those websites are sooo unreliable lmao
only people who have problems are gonna show up
i bet you get like 40mpg yeah?
I took the car on about a 300 mile trip last weekend and was very impressed at the passing power (bearing in mind the age and type of car) to go from 70 -> 80
Keep in mind the 40mpg figures is from the automatic.
kinda slow to get up and go from a stop but its not gutless at speed which is quite nice
hardly took any throttle input to jump right up to 80 plus
(highest I've taken it is 85 cause I'm chicken)
I haven't taken my car that much over the limit.
tbh it was more of an accident cause the road went down hill
and I was watching the other cars not the speedo lol
so weee downhill we go
might I add the fuel economy goes to shit a that speed
averaged only 20mpg with 160 miles of constant highway
"According to the magazine's annual vehicle reliability survey, owners of more than 500 Tesla Model 3s have reported "a relatively high number of reliability complaints." "
They had a handful of reports from the 500 owners
(also a bunch of these people had very early production models)
okay, and?
so the problems listed here are solved...
I'm sure a lot of the cars in the stuff you linked were likely tied to bad owners, or early models.
Like the back windshield breaking was only a problem on a small amount of model 3s first produced
"Engine Mount on Passenger Side Can Wear With High Mileage on Toyota Corolla"
which was fixed very early
Ah yes... engine mounts wearing out in high mileage situations.
Tragic really.
A consumable is consumed in use.
but consumer reports cited this as a large reason as to why they removed it
I recall they removed it because of super inconsistent braking lengths.
And then gave it back after Tesla did an OTA update.
Nice to know you are a beta tester for the car's brakes.
Interestingly, despite such reliability woes, Tesla drivers give the brand top marks in CR's annual owner satisfaction survey. Says Jake Fisher, senior director of auto testing at Consumer Reports, "When a vehicle has an enthusiastic following, like with Tesla, owners may overlook some issues."
nice
They weren't having inconsistent breaking
it was just longer than what consumer reports thought was a good value
it was 155 feet of stopping distance
which Tesla got down to 130, through an over the air software update
It was a wild range of distances.
Unlike other companies, Tesla doesn't test their cars, they let the customers test it for them
The Model 3 required 152 feet, which CR said was "far worse than any contemporary car we've tested."
Also 152 feet from 60 is horrific.
This isn't the first time CR has pulled the Model 3's Recommended tag. In May 2018, the magazine cited inconsistent braking performance as the main culprit behind the demotion, leading Tesla to issue an over-the-air update to fix the problem. CR retested an updated Model 3 and saw stopping distances drop from 152 feet to 130 feet, which was good enough to reapply a Recommended rating.
For reference a Honda Civic from 20 years ago did it in about 110.
42 feet.
That's what... a school bus?
The new shorter distance is typical for a compact luxury car and matches the 133 feet that Tesla claims its own testing found, using the same tires as those on our Model 3.
It was bad enough to have Elon Musk admit there was an issue.
from Consumer reports directly
Yeah, it took Tesla an OTA update and a CR report to fix an issue.
Not really a large issue for the average owner though
Until they need that extra 20 feet in an emergency.
no one needed it
There's a good chance someone wrecked their Tesla in that time frame.
if someone was complaining about not enough stopping power in that time, and it lead to a crash, you bet your ass that would have ended up on CNBC
Maybe the owner didn't know any better.
They do news stories on shit that Elon tweets, they 100% would pick up a story about Teslas not being able to brake in time
And like a good Tesla owner assumed it was just a driver issue.
How so?
cause it can be said about anything
You linked a complaints sight in an effort to make my new 'rolla look bad.
Looking at those issues you linked.
They are tied to cars from the 90s.
And it won't happen to current cars?
So not exactly a good link, now was it.
Who knows.
I know for a fact my car won't suffer from carbon build up on the intake ports.
And warped brake rotors should be a non-issue as well.
I know for a fact that tesla won't get either of those issues
or will get any engine related issues
uhhh... Weren't early examples of the Model S...
Didn't those get their engines replaced at extremely high rates.
Sorry, motors.
Yes
hmmmmm

I honestly don't know off-hand
Yes, they often had engine failures, with many of them having to get their engines replaced
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1093713_tesla-model-s-drive-unit-replacements-how-big-a-problem
It was a car company's worst public-relations nightmare. Edmunds.com, the widely-read automotive website, bought a Tesla Model S for long-term testing in February 2013. After nine months and 11,000 miles, the car developed an ominous grinding noise under acceleration and dece...
Also since we're tossing anecdotes out there.
My car's battery going bad won't make international news.
Only a handful of owners saying that they had failures
and it was all covered under warranty
A lot of the motors were replaced before they died.
Most I believe.
Technically they still worked.
But an engine with rod knock technically works.
So... yeah. Take what you will from that.
and it was all covered under warranty
Oh ok, so if many gas powered cars blow up their engine, but it's all covered under warranty, it's reliable?
From what I'm reading it was more about a noise they were making
and that there's no evidence the noise leads to or is a symptom of a failure
Tesla could have said, "working as intended."
No, just a shit special company.
If they cared, it wouldn't take 5 months to fix a dented body panel.
And Rich Rebuilds wouldn't have a channel.
nice goalpost shift
How did I shift the goal post?
we were talking about motor replacement
> they care about customer satisfaction

Thanks for that, it's good to start the day with a laugh
and now you're trying to bring up body panel service
Ah, so we're hyper focused on one issue only.
Well if we're only looking at motor replacements.
I'd just like to finish one topic before trying to shift it to another
Toyota never had early anything require 100% motor replacements due to engine noises.
And neither does Tesla
Literally no
We just talked about how Tesla replaced motors out of early Model Ses.
I'm looking at Tesla forums right now
and there are people with 200k mile model S' that have never had motor replacements
you said 100% replacement rate
one sec
that would entail 100% of cars would it not?
unless you were saying that 100% of cars that had replacements had replacements...
Ok, I don't know where you're getting that
unless it's from.. anecdotes....
No, statistics
from owners
Guess how many 2019 'rollas needed a new engine.
probably more than 200
x to doubt that 0 had any problems requiring replacement of parts
yea, it's probably way higher
yeah, nah
and you know, they design their stuff to fail at intervals so they get your money from service
Like Tesla.
?
Oh please.
"they build cars that fail just because"
That's honestly silly.
Ford did that.
And got reamed in the 70s.
I mean it's definitely true of most car manufacturers
No one builds cars that fail on purpose. Cars that fail on purpose don't get return buyers.
apple is still doing it but with phones
they get pelnty of buyers
Cause you are about to blow open a huge conspiracy.
Most companies do it with their products
^
no
this isn't a conspiracy
Apple does.
this is a known thing
most tech companies do
apple, samsung, ford, chevy, vw, fuck even nike does this
ok, all their products require service around the same time
yes
or have problems around the same time
yea im not talking about oil changes
Rubbers and certain compounds start breaking down after x amount of time.
People ignore things. And consumables go away after a point.
I'm talking about ignition coils failing, exhaust manifolds wearing through, etc
Yes, they're all made from the same material.
Steel.
After a few years of Northern winters... things start failing.
It's called rust.
yep, and you could design your products to fail at a later date
but there's no point for them to do so
because they get less money that way
Well yes. I'm certain even Tesla has designed things to a cost.
sure, but their products don't have these regular problems in them
Everyone has to balance profit, performance, and longevity.
Their new powertrains should last ~1 million miles
That's not the same as "they make it go bad after x amount of time."
With proper upkeep a modern car can last a hellishly long time.
and they just filed a patent for a battery that has been tested to last a million miles of cycle testing
Of course.
Things will go bad over time. That's a given.
But no one designs them to fail.
Rather things are designed to live as long as they can.
honestly filing a patent in my oppinion is a bad idea for some things
They design their components to last on average an amount of time
Easier to design a long lived object than to design one that fails at a set point.
And then when they fail, they get your money to work on it
because if you dont want someone to use your secrets, then dont make it public how it works
Yes, and Tesla gets money from you if anything ever fails.
Lol not really
Tesla has super long warranty periods on their cars
I heard Tesla also offers inhouse services like Toyota.
le gasp
So does Hyundai and VW.
what are their warranty periods?
no like could you find on their site that?
well their website will describe the details of their warranty
like a 10 year warranty that only covers your brakes isn't the same as a 10 year warranty that covers everything in the car
Ranging from powertrain to body/rust.
Car companies don't hide their warranties. They have enough issues with warranties as it stands.
"Tesla’s New Vehicle Limited Warranty includes a 4-year/50,000-mile warranty for comprehensive coverage, and an 8-year/unlimited mile Battery and Drive Unit limited warranty. Both warranties are designed to cover and repair or replace any defects in materials or workmanship of any parts that may fail during the warranty coverage period."
Yea so pretty similar
And VW has nixed their extended warranty.
meaning I will never touch their products.
I'm not going to touch VW for many reasons
Mitsubishi is a 10 year/100k warranty.
comprehensive or limited warranty?
ok, so it isn't a comprehensive 10 year warranty
Tesla's warranty is also limited.
yea ik
So not exactly super long.
Perfectly average matching the other high boys of the arena.
And dramatically higher than the Japanese.
yep
So with Tesla anything dealing with the battery back or motor controllers or the motors themselves are under warranty for 8 years
Which are like the most expensive parts of the car
And the current batteries should last between 300k and 500k miles, and current powertrains should last around 1 million miles.
will take a while to reach those distances until the cars are fully autonomous
I'm buying one
I don't think Tesla ever failed their goal.
The point of the model 3 was to be a more affordable, while providing the many benefits of an electric car.
You save nearly $5k every year by switching to electricity, if you average the normal amount of miles.
So even if it does cost around $40k, you easily save $5k after a year.
Ngl, I understand the price point that Tesla is coming from also. It's one of the longest distance electric vehicles, has one of the highest safety ratings, and has a bunch of fancy tech, including full self driving capabilities in the future.
.puggers.
puggers
slidey 
.pog.
puggers emote
nice recovery, but i'm assuming he wont be recovering those pants
I can’t even tell what car that is, poor graphics and it’s so slidey
That's what a gif is @fathom socket... A poor quality animation of pictures stuck together to save memory.
looks like a porsche to me
I know what a gif is, I’m just trying to figure out what car it is
It seems like a porsche, but I’m not sure and it’s bothering me
I look at it frame by frame, but I can't distinguish it either
I thought it was a Porsche too, but it looks like it has a longer passenger compartment
Or it's a Porsche 993 Turbo, could be
Quite sure it's a 993 Turbo
Those tail lights are definitely from the 993 turbo

Data from our track tests indicates that Model S Plaid can achieve 7:20 at the Nürburgring.
With some improvements, 7:05 may be possible when Model S returns next month.
343
2728
7:47
and never will be
its a gutted race track car
not a production, daily driveable car
The taycan that went around the track at Nurburgring was also a prototype
So they might be able to make the production version a little better
I mean if anything this track Model S is likely heavier than what the production version will be
???/
But it wasn't gutted
Roll cages aren't light
neither are interiors
However, I'm not surprised if they break the record
Because in the end of the Tesla is still lighter than the Taycan
AND other track safety systems
I'm even surprised the Taycan was that heavy to begin with
Doesn't necessarily mean it would be heavier with a third motor
Could be a lighter motor as well, but just as efficient
Who knows
This is supposed to be their new plaid powertrain that their next gen roadster will have
I'm more interested in those new rims the car has
@stoic ledge This chat is really into electrical vehicles and their inner workings
It's gonna have some thicc motors
Let's hope not
Would love to see a lightweight and efficient EV
lightweight and ev don't mix
That's what the model 3 is
unless you want short range
Yeah, but I mean for the future
Ah gotchu
Hence me saying, "I would love to see"
But yea current model S perf has ~750hp
If they added a third motor of equal power it could be hitting 1000hp
@MK This chat is really into electrical vehicles and their inner workings
X doubt
Lmao
Tesla will never be a relevant manufacturer.
Where do you propose this 3rd motor be placed?
This was their mechanical power graph
The cars are not able to be produced profitably
Me start my own car company?
Probably in the back
Nah I'm good
@vital glen on the roof, as a turbine
Yes
That's actually a thing one of my professors is researching right now, hybrid jet engines
remember elon's high ass thinks that the roadsters gonna have rockets on it
Where the main intake fan at the front of the engine is partially electrically powered
(like the government would ever allow that lol. audi can't even have their sequential tail lights)
Could cut fuel usage by a bit
@indigo coral he said rockets on track only
Yea we get it you don't like tesla @indigo coral
It's a plan, you just don't see it
and the model s that's going to run the Nürburgring will have 7 seats in it, not gutted at all
@stoic ledge to pee on the white seats
I'm just realistic - not a crazy tesla fanboy
I mean he just said he doesnt like it
?
^
^
I would buy a Model 3 in a heartbeat if 1. i could afford it and 2. the company was stable
I have been in model S and Xs and they are not refined
I like the look of many audis, but I don't like audi as a company
I was pointing out how pedantic the US governement is.
It's the epitome of engineers getting to fap how they would build an electrical vehicle
The S and X need a refresh
That we can agree on.
Haven't been in a model 3
They are dated in comparison to the 3
yet
The interior of the 3 (the premium interior at least) far outstrips the S and the X
the s and x feels like 20-30k interiors
And the 3 can do 250kw charging
It's an afterthought
S and X can only do 200
250kW charging using oil, coal etc puggers
puggers
It's still more efficient than gas.
^
ok teslas here
You're taking a step out of the equation and thus less losses
no intrests
imagine if all our energies were green...
@jagged coyote Then I would be using green colored gasoline?
btw ppl with powerwalls and solar panels are charging their teslas fully
You can also use Diesel generators like the Belgium police force puggers
@vital glen 
its belgium what do you expect?
I mean depending on where you go the diesel is colored blue
puggers
to make sure they don't confuse them
Good point falcon, good point
I don't look at the diesel, but iirc it's yellow
our diesel is yellow
and gas is just clear
gas is supar yellow here
e10/e15
while i use 98 instead of 95
the owners manual says to put Premium Plus in it ... good f*ckng joke
its been running fine for 20 years on standard, it'll keep running that way
say bye to your fkin wallet
i just get the 87 octane at costco
lol
never had any ill effects from using 87 instead of 93
lol i'm a student, and i have a diesel, so no expensive fill ups
even tho i would've wanted to stay in ireland for that 10 cent cheaper diesel
@jagged coyote diesel is cheap
@stoic ledge I should win a nobel prize in economic science,
for this statement "stop being poor, ez"
that pfp is a megane 2
With the average energy mix in Germany, 0.596 kilograms of CO2 are currently produced for each kilowatt hour of electricity generated.
So that's about 100g/km CO2, not really that much better than a efficient gas powered car these days puggers
i drive a megane 3, so no biggie
Hypermiling I get 29
i drive at the full gas
my car is really weird - I've tried to hypermile on tanks of gas and it hardly does anything
high revs
whether I drive like a bat out of hell or try to drive efficiently, it is always about the same
a tiny bit more but so small i don't even bother
That's why
5L/100km or 56.5mpg
shitty 4 speed yeah
I think my last gear is .6:1
thats
one sec lemme find mine
shiet missed the 100
kinda high
What?
yes
https://youtu.be/6RhtiPefVzM
@stoic ledge
Are Electric Cars Greener Than Gasoline Powered Cars? The Facts About Electric Cars & The Environment - Sponsored by FE What Happens To Old EV Batteries? htt...
Lol a 6:1 gear ratio, nice
I would be bouncing off redline barely getting to 20mph
Yes
@eager kite that's a very specific video
Rip.
1000km/h max speed
Great for off-road
you have to do that for your place of living
Lol no 6:1 ratio does not get you a high top speed
cant find me
Lower = faster
Yea ik he talks about that in the video @vital glen
1st: 3.938:1
2nd: 2.194:1
3rd: 1.411:1
4th: 1.019:1
i like
how my cars interior is the final facelift
but the outside is pre facelift
me no understandings
1st 4.484
2nd 2.872
3rd 1.842
4th 1.414
5th 1.000
6th 0.742
Our Explorer^^
I wish I had like 2 more gears lol.
I don't think they care @eager kite
Or you know, make 4th 1:1 or .9:1 @indigo coral
Something like that
you can't change that can you?
Well you can.....
Anything is possible with modding
It's just gears....
that explains why on the highway I'm sitting at 2300rpm at 60mph lol
But it is not worth the effort
yeah
Doing 60 at .73:1, my highest gear, my rpms sit about 1700 rpm @indigo coral
slow as molasses though
ye
my ratio is fairly high
which helps passing power at speed but not fuel economy or engine wear
wot
that's long shifts
top speed of what exactly
top speed for me would be 180km/h with a 5 gear stick
yeah, don't have the balls to do it too
mfw max torque on my engine is at 1750rpm
My car feels like it comes alive at 3k
1: 3.727
2: 1.960
3: 1.323
4: 0.946
5: 0.761
R: 3.308
puggers
like it feels like a switch flicks and it really picks up as soon as it crosses 3k rpm
while im going 140kmh with fourth gear

that's definitely like every other Model S