#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages Β· Page 60 of 1
NOT EVEN a photo shot from this low down can make the windows feel that tall
it's just stupid
and yeah sometimes the Xplane's FoV can make everything feel a bit fisheye-y
but it's not THAT bad
like, the IXEG cockpit can also look a little weird if you zoom out enough
but you can tell it's just weird FoV
with the 757 you can tell it's just all completely wrong
the yoke not even covering the ND is also hilarious
and it's tiny
it's just all wrong, and I have 0 faith they'll ever improve it
so I'm just waiting for the BlueBalls
i swear the 757 is either xp9 or xp10
Fair, not bad
Although would be nice to have earlier ones too
forgot how long it takes this tihng to boot up from cd
nearly there π
amazing how quickly I can do things whenever I'm actually motived for some reason 
Nearly there too
I'd love to have something older to fly to miami
w
I missed the wing reg
I'll update it tomorrow
actually I'll do it now
I won't be able to live with myself
@reef isle do u do commissions per chance?
Im looking for someone who can create liveries, itβs a large scale commission though spanning multiple aircraft though
ok, no promises, but feel free to send some details my way
So they're doing it huh
Love Alaska
bro what
I uh
I don't have any words
people on xbox are gonna be exited ig
Also I'm pretty sure the 380 would feel exactly like the 350 anyway
Well
That's cause it just won't feel, at all
It's a FBW aircraft, you won't feel how it flies at all
Same as the 350
So I honestly doubt having specifically A380 pilots testing it would bring anything new to the table
im personally quite happy with the FBW A380, so I think i'll pass
not that inibuilds aircraft have impressed me in the slightest either
I just don't fly the 380, but for the rare times I do, the FBW is more than good enough
Tbh I don't think I'll get any airbuses on top of the fenix ceo's bar the fenix neo's
I like my aircraft to be different enough rather than just longer or bigger
about that
huh
there's still a Kalitta NHRA top fuel drag racing team, and his nephew (Doug Kalitta) still races for the team
and of course kalitta racing is sponsored by kalitta air
Rip
Rip Spirit
I'm not at home
If any of you can do so without it being a problem or hassle
Can you maybe check if the Azerbaijan livery is included with the felis Tu-154 please?
Sorry thank you
https://www.avsimrus.com/f/fs2004-aircraft-liveries-and-textures-39/tu-154m-azal-4k-az10-23884.html
Maybe I can convert this somehow?
As far as I know, no
I don't have it on either the Π2 or the M
No problem
Honestly, the maddog installer is just annoying lol
I hate DFW
The plane just died mid takeoff roll lol
Gonna retry
Was busy watching the Miami sprint anyway
too much thrust?
the maddog has that
very cool
inibuilds should probably take note
Well which planes that ini made would benefit from simulating what happens when you have too much thrust?
You literally can't overthrottle an Airbus lol
L1011
idk I might be larping
Pretty sure the 1011 doesn't really care too much either
So how do I reset this thing...
Quite obviously I broke something on that takeoff attempt
Now it just doesn't start
And worst part is, it always loads in the same state I left it in
Even when I switch regs lol
I think you can reset it using the load manager?
Don't think so
you can't install the navigraph airac on while the plane is running on the MD-11 right?
no idea why I'm having some issues with Navigraph hub
which is scary since bad navigraph data can killl the plane
no you have to do it via the navigraph hub
China eastern A350 collided with a jetway today
nigh Guarulhos landing in bad weather with the MD-11
this can only go well
I was quite disappointed with the hand flying
the trim is really twitchy π«€
flew it to FL200
At least it's not Congonhas 
Also, why not the older livery, it's really pretty
1998 schedule and wanted to fly the PW
hahaha true
although they're both pretty sketchy
Tbh I haven't done Guarulhos yet, but soon
perfeclty on glide and 4 reds is such a MSFS moment...
of course at the end I get scared and tried to follow the PAPIs a bit, until I realized I was way too high 
at least I have an excuse for my terrible landing
the very forgiving MSFS stall physics saved me from stalling at 100ft or so, if this was Xplane I'd be dead probably
Picked up the Blacksquare Starship, very fun to operate
ooooo nice β€οΈ
On the ground at Lynden Pindling after an hours flight from Tampa, I'm very impressed with this
I swear I saw that screenshot on Volanta earlier today lol
I did post it on there yes
MSFS be MSFS
It's really quite annoying ngl
The Rhodiumcode A350 is coming to Microsoft Flight Simulator β and this is just the beginning.
Join us for the premiere of our first cinematic trailer, where we chase our A350 on an early morning departure from Taipei.
ποΈ Sunday, May 3 at 05:00 Zulu (Saturday, May 2 at 22:00 PDT)
Set a reminder and join us in the chat β we'll be here...
the 3d model still isnt done at all
u can clearly see it
also the windows look off i swear
they look kinda tall
Haters will say it makes no sense to fly in and out of Riga until the A220 comes out
I will forgive the writing being too tall this time
I will also commit another crime against humanity, I'll fly with the wrong plane, I'll probably do some of the TU3 flights with the TU5
but at least there's some evidence to suggest this did actually happen
I suppose being a small airline with a handful of planes it wasn't unreasonable to have a higher degree of plane substitution, that's my excuse at least
Also, I'll use the KLN90B, so I'll enjoy feeling my brain actively rotting while I have to scroll through all the letters with the rotary selector, if I'm good I'm hoping to manage like 2 waypoints a minute 
please kill me π
Tbh I imagine they would be used interchangeably quite often
Just use the NVU instead :P
Waypoints? Nah. "200km on track 120" to hopefully end up somewhere at least reasonably close to the destination? Hell yeah
CPH π
Thai time
In love with this thing
Nice π
Interesting design
The FAA is not happy
$100k to taxi a 787:777 around ORD
Ook
Yeah but
It's ORD
Firstly one of the worst airports out there
Secondly it's Chicago, so it's pretty much a 50/50 chance of whether you'll arrive to work on time or be shot on your way to work
you also need to be a former 777 or 787 captain or first officer to get it lmfao
how does that even work anyway? are you deadheading on the flights and then you taxi once it lands in ohare? or is this for like gate-to-gate or ramp-to-gate or something
Ramp to ramp
They wrote it's basically to move the plane between terminals
Doubt they'd fly you back and forth for no reason. You'd be based in Chicago simply
Which again, it's a good salary but it comes at the expence of a high chance of getting shot at
thats not terrifiying at all
what even is this thing supposed to be in the cockpit of the 757?
its way too small to be a coffee cup, but it looks like it has some liquid at the bottom
you ever land so smooth that you dont even realize that your rear wheels are on the ground
You have to live in the US
Ngl, delivering yak-40s will be even tougher than Tupolevs
The tupolev plant at least still exist
The Yakovlev plant is just completely gone lol
it's also very slow and has a hilarious range 
Yeah
But well
Delivering them to Moscow doesn't need much range
They were built in Saratov
So close enough
Closer than Tupolevs even
these two flights, the shorter one was with the Yak, the longer one with the Tu-154, they both took roughly the same amount of time π
But delivering them to the far east, where they would have the most use...
Yes....
Even a Tu-154 can't really go from Kazan to Vladivostok directly
A Yak-40 would need 3 times as many legs, plus Saratov is actually further away from there 
yeah sounds like a proper adventure lol
and it's not really possible to just let it fly and do something else
since I think the most advanced lateral autopilot mode is roll 
I don't even remember if it has heading or not, I don't think it does
Like... Saratov - Ufa - Omsk (if it even can) - Novosibirsk - Krasnoyarsk - Irkutsk - Chita - Blagoveshchensk - Vladivostok, something of that sort 
Start the flight in 1970, by the time you get to Vladivostok - congratulations, the USSR collapsed and everyone moved on to use ATRs 
Maximum mach number of 0.7 is just crazy lol
And a service ceiling of 8km, FL260 lol
And Cuba... idk how I would even get one there lol
on a boat lol
It probably would be easier to load it onto a ship and move it that way lol
(I genuinely have no idea)
Tbh I actually wonder how they did it
Cause I doubt the US, Canada and Europe would allow refueling stops for a delivery to Cuba
Although I guess Aeroflot did fly to the US and Canada after all, so maybe planes were kinda allowed?
No fucking way
moar fuel
looks like it hahahah
0 navigation, 0 anything
maybe via cape verde?
Probably some 8-9 hours to do it too
must have been so awful
I guess it does help they had navigators
But yeah
Must've been absolutely horrible
Probably navigating by stars too
So, TABA's BAe146s were delivered via Seville-Sal Island-Rio Grande
Well there are stopovers in the atlantic
no but Sal Island is too far south for it to make sense here
yeah I definitely don't think they were delivered via the US
there are no photos of any cubana aircraft being delivered like that I don't think
I think going from Cape Verde to the northeast of Brazil could be possible?
Although I don't remember how Brazil was aligned back then
https://www.airhistory.net/photo/551237/CU-T1221
"transported by sea to Santiago de Cuba for reassembly and delivery."
ok, so maybe the tanks were used to get it to somewhere were it would then be loaded onto a ship
Hmm, that does seem realistic
Could be Cape Verde itself
I'm pretty sure Aeroflot used it as a stopover for 62s going to South America
Now I remembered that we don't have 62s so I'm sad for today...
yeah but if you'll disassemble it and load it onto a boat
might as well load it in Europe itself no?
Yeah
I mean, there surely were some political obstacles
Who knows if they'd be allowed passage through the mediterranean
oh I guess it would have been from the north sea
But at that point, why not just throw it on a short flight from Saratov to Murmansk (although for a Yak-40 that would probably be done in 2-3 flights) and then just ship from there
I mean it could be that to save time they got to somewhere in africa and then loaded it onto a ship there
I guess shipping from somewhere like Cape Verde does save a couple days of time
Cause compared to going from Murmansk, that cuts the sea route in half. Even more really
And as we know quite well, ships are slow, plens are fast (when it comes to a Yak-40, comparatively fast)
yes
it's crazy how little photos there are of the Cubana's Yak-40s
I can't find anything at all besides these two in Prague
(outside of Cuba anyway)
wait, Yak-40s were never actually produced in Prague were they?
no
No, just Saratov iirc
YOOOOOOOOOO
Reykjavik-Shannon-Berlin-Minsk @rustic charm
but this was for maintenance after the fall of the Soviet Union
but it's still something
I wonder how it got to Reykjavik
must have been via the US and canada
That's interesting
ok so this is what I'll tell myself so i can stop thinking about this
the photo with the tanks is in '89
by that time the cold war was even cooler and it's not too much of an outlandish proposition for the US and Canada to let Cubana fly their stupid little planes around
so the "transatlatic tanks" were there so they could actually fly the northerly route via Shannon
Probably, yeah
but one (or both) of these are true:
-
Either when first delivered they were actually transported by ship (no matter the date), but for regular maintenance they'd fly via north america (I guess from a propaganda PoV it could make sense for the US to be unhappy about helping cubana get new planes, but maybe they'd be less unhappy about their planes being maintained?)
-
It was just a timing thing, and after a certain date they were allowed to fly via north America, so they just did, and before they were just shipped, probably via the north sea.
that would also make sense as to why they were in Prague
ok, so the dates would also actually make sense
this (in 1980) is the first photo in Airliners.net of a Cubana plane in the US
without it being a hijacking or deflection
so I guess from the '80s onwards the US was cool with Cubana planes in the US?
I guess so
I mean, I think at some point Cubana started having routes into the US?
So at some point the US definitely became fine with it
after having to cancel yesterday's flight I barely managed to survive and land for the first time in the 154b2 in Xplane12
this thing is very different from the old version I had in XP11 π
Why TF did It give me il-62 with 6 engines in the search completion
most normal soviet prototype
Yeah there's one random pic which I'm pretty sure is just photoshop, and somehow it's one of the first pictures that you get as a result for searching Il-62 lol
Also, remember my issues with the maddog a few days ago?
Yes the ones where I broke the plane and it decided that now that broken state is the default state
Well
I. fucking. reinstalled. the. thing.
It's still in the same state
The balkans are beautiful
I really gotta get fly the 154 to Tivat
That is simply lovely
Anyway, it looked like the engines on the maddog worked this time, so time to leave awful DFW and go to a (not really) quiet Caribbean retreat
But first, I gotta set some boarding music
Cause apparently the maddog allows you to just use anything
Do any other planes actually allow you to do that?
I'm pretty sure the 146 had boarding music
Gotta fly the 146 soon too, I've got a Dan Air one on standby after all, and iirc they used to fly those to Innsbruck
146, RJ and Fenix do too π
Welp I don't have the RJ, but gonna have to set it for Fenix too
Cause I found the perfect opion
Let's see if anyone here knows
Apparently this image is Madrid
Which like
Sure ig
I don't even know anymore
Says it was taken in Madrid
I mean, yeah, if it says taken in Madrid then it's probably Madrid
What's wrong with that
Okay now the plane works, but...
MSFS decided that removing chocks is too much to handle lol
Welp, taxiing out
And before you ask
The chocks are in fact still on
Ugh I hate DFW
There are many that I actually like
Heathrow, Sheremetyevo, Anchorage, Malpensa, Memphis, JFK, Miami
All are good
But DFW... nah
Honestly
So real
Love to see it
I mean, George Washington was famous for playing with his kite...

HAHAH I need to fly this route with ATC now
"American 606 requesting direct to fatso"
I got once "United 2331 cleared direct BZNGA"
Which was pronounced as bazinga

i honstly dont understand why people say toliss' cockpit texturing is bad, its pretty adequate
To me it looks kinda strange but that's mostly me being used to msfs
Goodbye US, off into the Caribbean now
Btw, the fuel expectancy on climb is just weird lol, cause now it shows me fuel on arrival at 8klbs, on climbout it was down to 4.7 iirc
I only know metric tons
How hard is it to multiply by 1000 mate
Do you want me to write 8.0 * 10^3 lbs next time 
2304 lbs in a metric tonne
Yes
2204 sorry
Romania's just complaining about me writing 8klbs instead of 8000lbs 
Just some banter lol
I'm just being a bitch cuz I'm bored 
and 2240 in a us ton. easy to remember cos you just swap the 0 & 4
I thought for a second this was airac cycle you were talking about I have no idea why
2403 has traumatized me
I love my airac cycle from April 2022
Over the Bahamas
Need to take the Rotate MD80 for a run
I should keep my fucking mouth shut
"Going to beautiful Caribbean"
Haha nope
Right engine out
Well it says I can still make it to San Juan
Don't most US Diesel locos use kLbs (force)?
If the plane is small enough, could use Unalaska and Adak, much closer
Can someone please find a chart for ILS 14 in MYNN
Can't seem to find a single free source
damnit
thats PADK or whatever
isnt it?
trying to get a delivery tour done for the Ejets rn
but the 175 cant make it
and i REALLY dont wanna route it eastbound via the eu from brazil
Yeah
RJCK is kushiro iirc
Probably
I just selected the closest one cause I was almost flying on fumes at that point
Was supposed to go to Sapporo initially
You can see I had an INS fuckup in the beginning too, plus I had a bad climb, I reckon if I did everything correctly from the start I would've reached the destination fine
epcot center in XP12 
I'm just debating what to fly 
Also slowly packing up the bags (even though I don't have to leave for at least 10 days lol)
thinking of flying either the A321neo or the 777-300ER
Packing up is a pain now cause idk if my bags will be within weight limits
Normally they would be
But I bought a steering wheel
The base weighs over 6kg by itself 
I wasn't home like 65% of the day myself
For those not on the FJS discord. The 732 in testing in 12
didnt even know there was a FJS discord
they've been working on it for ages π₯²
I might start to fly the 727 a lot
I think I'll give up on XP11 as soon as they release their 732
but I really don't want to fly the FSS 727 π
Ambient occlusion be like ight I'm out
Tbf it's fine, just wish we had more cockpit options
Also for me personally, wish it worked...
Idk why but it just broke on my end lol
Well, the radio panels broke
And that's a problem cause I can't set a single VOR
I can't explain justify this rationally, but I just don't like it. Somehow that cockpit is repulsive to me
I don't know what it is
Fair
I just look at the FSS 727 cockpit and want it to go away
at least with the FF757 I can rationally justify why, since it's totally wrong, but the FSS 727 isn't that bad
It just looks wrong to me for some reason
Anyway, today ain't about 727s for me
Decided that I want to fly into some truly random airports
And not like small town in Montana kind of random, real random
And there's only one way to do that
Fly to the other Bucharest airport
(the one south of LROP)
Nah, don't wanna fly at night
Plus I found the perfect option
As I said, when you want random airports, there's just 1 way to do it
Going on flight radar, filter the planes out of click randomly?
Please bro I need to know 
Tel Aviv
Oh hell nah π
Well, tbh I need to put all the politics aside and fly there at some point, also I'm pretty sure RedWings actually currently runs Tu-214s there from Moscow
But well, I don't have the 214 yet
Have you ever heard of animawings
No
Hell yeah
I love this thing
Only managed to start engine 1 on 3rd attempt lol
Honestly the fact that this thing actually has an alt hold mode and the Tu-154 doesn't is the funniest thing ever
Perfect cruise altitude...
Holy shit
No way
it does π
it's the "H" button
Well yeah but the last time it didn't really do a good job 
It did try, I'll give it that
fair, it was always good for me
It tried its best to hold the altitude
But it ended up starting to oscilate
More and more
So I decided to just leave the plane without it, just in a state trimmed close to level lol
ok that's weird, I had this discussion with people while testing the TriStar, and I said that both the 134's and 154's autopilot have been better than the first iteration of the ini 1011 (I think it was in 1.0.1 or .2 that they improved it)
and got some pushback
maybe soviet auopilots like me?
I still have big problems with IAS and MACH, I stopped using them again and just use V/S, but that might correct
Well I did have some issues with AT, but as far as I know it's just Tristar logic kicking in, not any bugs or inaccuracies (in all fairness, the opposite)
yeah I think it's weird what happened with the 1011
I think in part the real autopilot was actually rubbish in some cases and could ""fail"" (i.e. start to oscillate weirdly), but at the same time I think ini sort of "overcorrected" and made it overly bad in certain cases
I think how it is now it's a better compromise being totally honest, it's not perfect, but it's not bad to the point it's worse than the the one in the stupid Tu-134 π
I am of the idea that IAS and MACH are probably not that bad IRL, but I have nothing real that supports this idea of mine
Fair
Tbh I haven't tried them really
Vspeed, INS and AT are the way to go
On the topic of AT
Do you know what makes it kick into AOA mode
Cause it basically just starts keeping the minimal non-stall speed, and doesn't actually let me increase the reference speed
AoA is the "baseline" mode, so if it doesn't know what it should do, or you don't tell it, it will "fall back" to AoA
maybe try to select IAS first and then try to increase the speed, or select TM
Weird... I always select AT and IAS, set it to some value, and then it occasionally ends up switching into AOA
i hate how different devs do different things in xplane
flightfactors thrust reversers are press to hold in maximum reverse thrust
but like every other aircraft is toggle reverse, and then throttle up to increase reverse thrust
ended up overrunning the runway big time because i forgot that flightfactor is different
does anyone have the link for the An-24 in Xplane12?
I'm finding some stuff for it
but not the actual whole plane
nice β€οΈ
Couldn't find it myself
Only saw the XP11 version on github, nothing else
oh, I guess that explains it
I saw that someone managed to make it work by messing in Plane Maker, but the autopilot doesn't work
ΠΠ½ 26 xplane 12<br>Π€Π°ΠΉΠ» ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠ΅:<br>An-26_ce.zip<br><br>https://disk.yandex.ru/d/HMBURJ-a1RCyRQ... Π‘ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΠΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅.
this was that version I told you about
no autopilot but flyable
(and that's the An-26, not the 24)
I think it's just a model swap with an FSX model, but everything inside is An-24
yeah don't think so
don't know much about these planes but I think they're fairly similar
But without AP at all I doubt I'll be able to fly it much
I might give it a try, and see if I can survive, I don't mind hand flying, but I'll have to see how big the workload is
Especiall considering this thing is fucking slow
Around 240kts iirc 
Even lower if heavy
That's lower than the DC-6 XD
And the DC-6 is hardly a racecar
See, the USSR either builds absolute rockets like the Tu-154 (I'm pretty sure it can cruise up to .88 and .9 even if not too heavy, and around .84 under normal loads), or absolute bricks that will end up taking 5 business days to move you 200 miles, and not a single mile more because they run out of range 
yay
and I think xplane just crashed 
I'm sure it's fine π
so unfortunate that I think it's the only soviet turboprop available in any modern sim at all
no An-12, Tu-95 or Tu-114
Yeah
I'd love a Tu-114 π₯Ί
It would be amazing indeed
More things to scare US controllers with
Also
The simple speed of that thing
And overall the performance
FL390 ceiling (probably could go higher)
Mach 0.8 maximum speed
Enough range to go from Moscow to New York
Basically the USSR built a turboprop that is essentially a jet in all of its stats
weakest soviet turboprop powered aircraft
to be fair I think its "economic cruise" was a little slower and lower than most jets
but the fuel consumption was very impressive, especially for the time
Well yeah
But still, even the econ cruise would be faster than any other turboprop really
Heck, I wouldn't limit to civilian
Especially considering that it is basically a reinteriored Tu-95 bomber 
been ponding hoping in this recently, very fun n rewarding aircraft to fly
just hope that fslabs gets theirs out for msfs at some point soon
Brits in Tenerife be like
QRT: Shrek
Yβall mind if an ogre speaks a little espaΓ±ol tonight?
The crossover we never knew we needed
Why do I ever even hope that the weather in Alaska is clear skies...
Never happens
Not once
XP11 still rocks π
Maybe next time I'll do 721 from Tempelhof to Munich-Riem
backdate it in the late '60s and '70s instead of '80s
then maybe I can do a little bit of UAL 727 from Heathrow?
not sure why I'm in the mood of doing US carrier flights in the EU π
That's the best possible kind of PAA/UAL flying you can do lol
I think Delta had something in Europe too?
I really need to fly some PAA 727s in Europe
Tegel to Moscow
I even own the payware Tegel
Engines: 4
TOW: 78000lbs
TORA: no
Time for 200 miles of hoping cause the only navaid at PAIM is an NDB and we all know MSFS is shit with those
I found it...
Then lost it again 
This runway's annoying
This runway's quite a bitch
That's PAIM done though
If someone wants a challenge, I recommend this XD
Where are you landing bro
You're landing in the literal middle of nowhere
Exactly
Everts opsβ’
That strip (and I think it should be a gravel strip actually, but MSFS didn't want to) exists entirely just to serve a USAF long-range radar station
It's owned by USAF too and is a proper military airstrip, only military aircraft, and aircrafted specifically contracted by the military (like Everts DC-6s occasionally are) are allowed to land there
Proper flying IMO
FJS 732 should be released on XP12 the first half of June
Beat me to it π
R E D
tried the sharedflight thing for xplane 12 today, super fun!
yep pretty smooth
unless for the fact simbrief importing didnt work for the other person
might know the issue for this though
unless, everything worked nicely
Tbh considering that for us the option for shared cockpit would be the Tu-154, the simbrief import won't be needed 
Greeting everyone
then have fun with it!!!!!
today me and my friend will try vatsimming today
we only did a trial run
I'm sure we will, once we finally get round to it that is 
Lovely
I'm right off onto the next one here
Did Moscow - Saint Petersburg
Now Saint Petersburg down to Sochi
The title says A320, but it looks like a weird hybrid of an A300 and A320 cockpit?
Itβs cool nonetheless, my home cockpit is just an Xbox controller 
i was gonna say, im 90% sure its an a300/a310 simulator
I didn't give the plane enough NU stabilizer
had no pitch autorithy to flare π₯²
sorry to all my passengers
sorry to my plane
I'm sure XP12 is more sensitive to the stabilizer setting
in XP11 I never really touched it and it was always fine
@rustic charm
We nearly met π
Film the landing
Please
I want to see you land that thing
Sad tree noises
Also it's night now, you'd see nothing
Turn on night vision bro
Does it have sun glasses
I don't think the plane had sunglasses
I don't think the sim has sunglasses either
Xplane does 
What have you never taken off straight into the sun
Don't think I've had any situation where I actually needed something to block the sun
In XP12 it 100% is 
that flight I just did I taxied looking straight at the sun
literally could not see ANYTHING, I had to raise my "seat" until the sun itself was hidden behind the cockpit wall so I could actually see a little bit
sunglasses didn't really help either
Flight Simulator player nails the perfect landing
π₯: u/ed3dfx
I took off into the sun with a tu-154
I put down the cover a bit cuz I didn't think of the sun glasses
Nice
Dunno if this was posted already
Something isn't adding up...
Man I sent this a 3am I canβt even remember what it was supposed to be
5 days in a row flying kills a mf
The FJS 732 for XP12
The link actually points there
But I think it got cut off partially so for whichever reason it opens an old page
My screenshots and thumbnails really are rubbish
Tbf I think thumbnails might just be the most important part lol
after I finish a livery usually the LAST thing I want to do is thumbnail and screenshots lol
I mean I think to be fair some of them are not bad, but I could definitely put a lot more effort π
like the Luzair one is terrible
probably at some point I'll retake them all
if I actually fly with them?
Blue Tulip β€οΈ
I wish we had a proper EIS1, the Hues one is... better than nothing
Yeah that's fair
I'm just saying that people will often not click on the livery just cause it doesn't look nice on screenshots
idk I don't like this livery
how many liveries did united have
On jet planes they had 6 I think
Friendship, Saul Bass, Battleship Grey, Blue Tulip, Continental/Globe, Evo Blue
I think with friendship there were a few slight variations
But overall that's it, yeah
Even on the same type tbf
Like the 727s
Some had a thick red stripe that curves down on the front
Looks like here for example there are no stars
Aaaaah yes, I get what you mean now
Others had a full polished bottom, on the front too, and no red stripe
Every time we end up talking about this I feel so sad
After the merger United really lost its soul π
They didn't even keep their own logo...
I think that Friendship and Saul Bass were peak, then Battleship Grey was the dark ages, Blue Tulip was a step towards revival, then COA was the revival itself and Evo Blue is kinda just a variation of that
I do think it's bad they lost the yellow in the globe with evo blue, but other than that it's quite great
I just can't help but feel that COA is very bland
It's not bad
It's just... Nothing
Even the logo feels very generic, just the globe
I was never a fan of their liveries though, even when they had the meatball
I'm not very fond of the red and gold colours scheme, but at least it was interesting
Battleship Grey is the opposite. I don't think it's particularly 'good". I think US Airways delivered much better with the same concept with their black livery, but it was anything but bland haha
I think I actually prefer Evo Blue to the Globe, even though I agree, a dash of orange would have gone a long way
(same with the latest DLH livery)
I guess I agree there
It's not bland
It's unique
But I still just don't like it
Honestly the worst one of United's liveries
That's fair
I also think that Saul Bass was probably their best, but closely followed by Blue Tulip
With yes... Battleship Grey being a little bit of a dip
Although I still think they're all fantastic overall
Friendship was good, but I think it's definitely very '60s π
While I genuinely think UAL could do a Saudia and bring back Saul Bass and it would look FANTASTIC on their A350s and 787s
Oh yeah, friendship tbh is very very piston-era
Or Cathay
Yes
They did it too
Saudia is a little annoying since the livery they brought back isn't the exact same
I think it's a little worse
Honestly, if United brought back the "U" and repainted everything in Saul Bass, the world would just heal.
Well with both Saudia and Cathay, the old liveries had a shiny polished bottom
That is simply impossible on 350s
I mean more about the line no longer being a cheat line
I think it would have been cool if they made it "interact" with the cockpit windows and kept it higher
don't get me wrong, it's still very cool π
I know that polished metal isn't a thing anymore unfortunately
I agree there tbh
Yep
it looks good in the united livery
i cannot lie
For Qatar, there can never be enough F1 sponsorships 
Literally the title sponsor of half of the races, plus also a sponsor specifically for Alpine
At this point they should probably buy out the team
Meanwhile Etihad sponsors the rest of the races and McLaren. Should also just make their own team so we get a Qatar Airways vs Etihad title fight
My overnight luck is someting else
From what I can see, for whatever reason the AP got disconnected and the plane entered a nosedive
Be careful with it, heard it sometimes likes to disagree with pilots
How to identify an MD-11 by takeoff performance data alone:
V1 of 180+ kts? That's an MD-11
Doing the crazy departure too
Simply lovely
benzhangar went live on Twitch. Catch up on their Microsoft Flight Simulator VOD now.
benzhangar went live on Twitch. Catch up on their Microsoft Flight Simulator VOD now.
frantic moment of trying to stop the plane descending when I hit W by accident
π₯²
Over western Russia now, almost in Europe
Ngl I really need to fly in Asia more
Currently for me it's basically just the Asian part of Russia plus VTBD and VHHX 
Descending
Slightly above profile
(Slightly = 8000ft above)
Yep, doesn't look like I'm ready for final
All parked up and done, that's one plane returned home. Probably a few dozen more to go... 
how derated was that

Flex 24
wtf
i dont think ive ever managed to get a v1 above 165
Well, it was an MD-11 with over 12 hours worth of fuel and basically a maximum load that would still permit the range
I wasn't at MTOW
But I was at the maximum weight that I'd be able to do that flight with
PWs and GEs have pretty much the same performance tbh
takes quite the throttle to get it rollin with the PWs tho
Yeah, taxi requires a fair bit more throttle input, but takeoff is pretty much the same
Also how dare ye call the PWs inferior
PWs are really nice
Very sad they get overlooked
Like with the 310
And I won't even... actually I will mention the fact that early 310s had JT9s, why can't we have nice things
some yes
but in most cases GE and RRs are just... better π
ATC in china on vatsim is even more terrifying than the russians
is it me or is the levelup 737ng better than the zibo one (unless for the fact theres no PA announcement pack and ground services)
I prefer the Zibo flight model
I use the Levelup for the non -800s though it's ok
personally, I prefer the visual upgrades of the levelup over the zibo
even if the zibo flight model is better, the levelup is still pretty good
went for a NEO flight that isn't in Europe
ofcourse from my favourite destination, Phuket
the only stupid thing is that the levelup 737 approach mode feels a bit broken
it doesnt really follow the glideslope its supposed to
needed to do a go around
Der offizielle Tuifly Song, der auch im Flugzeug immer abgespielt wird.
Diesen gibt es unter http://www.tuifly.com/de/unternehmen/multimedia.html als MP3 KOSTENLOS downzuloaden.
After the Air Berlin song
we have LET US FLY WITH TUIFLY
I love that YT recommends me this stuff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeWEdyY-aLQ
@rustic charm
Film from the Film Unit/Net archives via Ron Grier. RARE mini-promo from 1973, extolling the virtues of the then new Il-62M, which had increased range over the original aircraft. A real treat for Russian airliner fans, here's a chance to see the "M" model wearing Aeroflot's short lived "Reebok" livery. Cool, funky soundtrack, too! Be sure to che...
wtf
That's beautiful
Wait, does Vatsim force you to go by your real name?
yes...
not it absolutely isn't
What's wrong with nicknames...
Well
Obviously we know, nicknames are "not serious", and we all know vatsim is "a very serious community"
I think as long you pick a reasonable sounding nickname and nobody "reports" you or anything like that you'll probably get away with it
but in some cases they have asked people to send photos of their ID...
That's... bad
I ain't sending them my ID in case what
Well, my passport cause I don't have an ID
But either way, easier to log off
π
correct
they've done that to ME

i got suspended until i sent them proof of name
super dumb
Worst part about VATSIM IMO
i really dont wanna or can shittalk vatsim
but
they're like avsim
if anyone remembers the fiasco of dealing with their admin team
not many here will but man
those people had a massive stick up their bum
or pmdg forums
please sign with your full name, social security number, and the 3 digits on the back of your credit card
i havent used avsim for anything but their file library, so i dont know personally
Vatsim has a file library? thats news to me
avsim, i am tired
LOL?
my nickname is just my "name" and my pronouns
surprised nobody reported me
i have no idea how jetblue does their transatlantic flights irl, i am right at the absolute limit of weight, fuel, and runway for this flight
im climbing like a 747
I couldnβt do it irl.
my brother did, i have no idea how he survived in an A321 for almost 7 hours 
jetblue has a C24Y114 config in their cabin, which is probably why its able to make the trip, there's only 138 pax on board
yeah, updating the simbrief route with the proper pax number, it doesnt throw any warnings or errors now
in hindsight, i dont know how i didnt think about how the cabin configuration and passenger number would probably be how jetblue operates these transatlantic flights 
its fun learning about stuff like that though, i never really considered that airlines have sub-fleets inside of just the same aircraft type
Do u have any additional ACTs?
from what i know, its basically impossible to find out if an A321neo has ACTs from an outsider view, unless if there's some resource that has it listed
i'm just going with the standard A321neoLR profile on simbrief with 3 ACTs
Correct
Aer Lingus runs their XLRs with 185 seats and a 2 class iirc
Plus 3 ACTs
yeah, that sounds about right
jetblue's mint first class takes up a pretty massive amount of space given the fact that its an A321, so that probably has to do with the cut down number of economy seats
PAKT
Capacity is limited to 156 I think, funky catering loads, ultra lightweight seats, no cargo only hold baggage (exception of medical supplies and small engineering equipment)
Also they use weird thales trolleys that weigh like 6kg
The toliss accounts for only the standard 321 config but it accounts for the performance differences between neo subvariants
LR
Doing a milk run I hope?
Well milk runs start in Seattle tbf
True that
Think I might go to Juneau
But Seattle - Ketchikan doesn't feel like a milk run tbh, it's bit different
Juneau is fun
The approach was really fun, let me send the video. The weather was moody as hell and it felt like a scene from How to train your dragon lol
I remember not too long ago... actually, long ago me & a friend did a full milk run together, real-time
Which for me was 6am lol
So there we were, him on a 737 and me on a 738, in absolutely terrible weather, doing Seattle - Ketchikan - Wrangell - Petersburg - Juneau - Anchorage with no breaks
Funny enough there was a chance we'd get split up, cause when we left Seattle, the weather in Wrangell permitted cat B aircraft to land, which the 737 was in, but I was in cat C in a 738 and the weather was below minimums. Thankfully it improved slightly so I could land there too
Iβd cry I think xD
Thatβs so long
I did a Spokane and back before I went to Ketchikan
Oh yeah, the flights alone aren't that long, but you take into account ground time and, well...
Actually that last one wasn't 6am for me, it was fine it looks like
Took off from Seattle at 6pm, landed in Anchorage just shy of 3am
The trial run before it was fun though. I didn't follow the ground times then, just land, taxi in, taxi out & take off. So no waiting. Took off from Seattle at 10pm, landed in Anchorage at 5:30am 
Anybody up for shared cockpit on 5 flights throughout the night? 
Great start to the day
HAHAH
LOL
What a troll
LOL?
do people just assume some aircraft dont have ILS???? π
The other way around tbf
People assume that all aircraft have RNAV
And generally RNAV procedures are "prefered" nowadays I think
it wasn't even about the approach
Especially when it comes to SIDs and STARs
but the SID
Yeah, wrong word from me there π
I think I might have been partly to blame because I forgot to include the SID in my routing, (SimBrief somehow didn't recognize the MIA2), but I had the first waypoint as a MIA2 exit point
Tbf RNAV SIDs and STARs do offer a lot more flexibility, but trying to follow one in a Caravelle...
so I wanted to manually add the SID to the FPL when I submitted it for VATSIM, but I think I just changed the aircraft type and forgot
that's what's crazy to me
so he found a weird plane
I assume he must have googled it?
and then he though "oh what a weird route this guy has, sure SimBrief is stupid" and plonked the RNAV SID and routing there
if he didn't send me the S210 message
I honestly wouldn't have cared at all
Yeah, that would be less surprising
But when he knows you're flying a plane from what, the 60s?
I think it's the 60s anyway
Also what sim is that even
I don't think anything new has the 210
XP12, so the sim is recent at least hahahah
yes π
Well that's cool

)