#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages Β· Page 52 of 1
Where's me 800
is the 800 neo out irl yet
I want to fly to Greenland
There's only 9
Pretty sure it's been flying for some time
Hahah
Take screenshots l
L?
Fah
Sorry why does the A338 have a range of 8100 nautical miles
Cause it can't reach 8200
That sounds mildly threatening
triple
seven
the ff777 is hands down the best 777 ever made
Couldn't find the gif I was looking for
But let's agree to disagree
You got it?
ye
I'm waiting to see if possibly JF will be one of the resellers
i'd imagine so
anyone got the chinese flight levels sheet?
merci
Quatre vingt dix neuf?
You can
There's an add-on for that
Oh, I see maintenance managed to bring you landing gear
Da pencil
the livery feels wrong though
the fonts also wrong and the colors feel abit washed imo
Also that looks cool
framwise on par with the pmdg planes however
Time to learn astronomy
Infinite flight ah graphics
I love the A3pencil-600
Yeah
Well, warning/caution/TD would work
But
On caution, seriously?
You can get caution really often
Would be annoying to be paused on each
worst position EVER
honest review:
you pay for the system compared to visual fidelity, i personall think that the cockpit colors are bit too washed, same with PFD/ND colors. sounds are ok, some buttons dont have a sound at all (CSTR bttn e.g)
EFB is ok. its a toliss standard i'd say, it has lots of options no doubt, for me however the automatic input of weights in for refueling didnt work. the throttle config is also really terrible compared to ini, workable however. pause at t/d i mentioned above, for me personally thats important because of work etc.
FMC works, no complaints, uplinking the TO data however gave me entirely false results than the EFB did 
flightmodel wise very good, feels mega heavy like i'd expect from am a346
oh yeah, also no auto step climbs
not a super big deal of course but annoying to me
Tbh no steps is a bit annoying
it's small things obviously but for me thats important in a long haul aircraft
i dont think i'd buy it again as is rn
X plane
Departing PANC simulating the Iditarod air force picking up and delivering dogs along the route
777-300ER freighter
never knew that existed
I agree
π
321N
Neat
its got more than just a lanidng light problem
yea now might be an idea to divert
help
I'm no expert but I think something's wrong
Seriously though, are you playing with some maximum failure frequency? lol
it just happend

im flying vors now
i lost gps
I can only suggest landing as quickly as you can lol
not again 
A321neo my beloved
Quantas 32 moment
Why's this Airbus? Taking the piss? I've been clearing ECAMs for 30 mins
I think Airbus dislikes you
Yay
New dev update
Focuses on lighting
i wonder if there'll be an automatic FE option
Gorgeous
Most likely
It seems to be a standard for 3-crew airliners
So I doubt JF won't do that
that is very very nice
What was it only the B2?
ye
the B2 was an entirely different ACF tho with some assets ported from the Felis -M
the M is now fully updated and then some
new performance metrics and avionics presets
Is the M any easier to fly?
I wouldn't quite say easier, but it's a bit different still
The Π generally has climbs faster and descends a lot slower than Π2, it generally keeps speed more easily
Also some slight differences in the electrical system, and I think nav instrumentation is a bit different (although nav capabilities stay the same)
nah?
-M has full GPS functionality
i thought the -B2 was VOR or the soviet INS only
Maybe Ms got retrofitted with it and that's what sims depict to have some bigger differences between them?
Cause I'm pretty sure originally neither of them had GPS
Not sure if they originally even had any inertial nav at all
Looking at real cockpit pictures, the GPS there is definitely a later addition
i think some of the much much later built M's had GPS
That is very possible tbh
Cause Ms were built until
2008
Which honestly is quite crazy, cause it's essentially the same as if Boeing keps building 727s into 2000s
this was the 90's so it was semi mandatory for new aircraft
It has GPS as well I think?
Maybe?
Well the original ones shouldn't really, newest Ms looks like got it from the factory, all others that survived long enough seemingly were retrofitted
Tbf it shouldn't be too difficult
Also try it with a fully Russian cockpit and no translate
It's genuinely not that hard
Wish I could agree from experience
But of course, the only 2 Soviet things in MSFS are An-225 and An-2
the startup is more difficult since for whatever reason soviet/russian planes have a switch for a lot of things that in a western aircraft would be just automatically powered up whenever you have some specific bus powered
so you can miss some important things and maybe not realize until it's too late
but the actual flying and autopilot isn't any "harder" or more difficult
it's just different
Just gotta get used to the instruments
Cause Soviet ones were quite different
The artificial horizon especially
yeah but even then it's not like it's something you have to decrypt or anything, if you're not used to it you won't be able to just give it a quick glance and "read" it, but after looking it at it for 2 seconds you will immediately understand what it's saying
Oh yeah
It only becomes specifically difficult when you're already under stress and high workload
Cause then you just revert to what you're used to, so you might misinterpret the instruments
yeah it does, well, that's what I mean, what it usually something that's "automatic" becomes something you have to stop for a second and actively think about, if you're in a situation where you don't have enough "headroom" (literally) for that, then you're in trouble π
as they were in the 737 π¬
I find the 134 significantly more difficult than the 154 too
the 134 is to the 154 what the Caravelle is to the 732 hahah
Well, tbh I don't think the artificial horizon even played any significant role there. Even if they had the Soviet instruments they were used to, the flight was doomed from the start
Yeah, well it certainly didn't help
but agreed, it probably wasn't the one deciding factor
A 737 flown by what was essentially a 1-person crew, a crew that didn't have much experience with western avionics and navigation equipment at that, in an imperfect plane, in the dark, in worsening weather conditions...
Aeroflot has come a long, long way in terms of crew cooperation since then
#msfs2020 #msfs2024 #flightsimulator #justflight
Here's just a short clip giving a hint of the quality of the sounds incorporated into our F70/100 Professional for MSFS.
More development details are now live and for all the key product details please visit the product page:
https://www.justflight.com/in-development/f70-100-professional
"Time to do another Alitalia Livery!!" β€οΈ
Please release
Please
What a weird way of phrasing that
Is MSFS24 good yet or are people still sticking to 2020
I personally am sticking to 2020, but mostly because I am too used to it so don't yet feel fully comfortable in 2024. In itself the sim doesn't have any major issues for me
Ngl 2024 looks a bit plastic
How so? Is it a change in the graphics engine?
No clue
I don't even have the sim just from photos and videos it looks like plastic to me
Anyway
I don't think there's a change
Graphically I'd say 24 can be worse, equal or better than 20
Depends on how you run it
If you can run 24 on good settings, it's going to look better
A friend who moved fully to 24 says to him it looks a lot better
When I run it, it looks pretty much the same as 20 to me
There is a chance you'll need to run it on lower settings though due to performance, in which case it will look worse
For me its the opposite
For me 2024 runs way way better (from abt 30 fps to 90-100) and looks better, using higher settingd
It's probably that my GPU is a little underpowered compared to my CPU and RAM
That's usually good for simulators (that's why I decided my PC to be like that)
But not for simulators that use 24GB of Vram to render a leaf on a tree
My 24 settings are slightly lower than in 20, cause I don't have much VRAM (that's the limiting factor for me), so it looks roughly the same as 2020 and runs about the same
I have more vram than any of you (probably) but the GPU is poo π₯
What are you using?
I DONT HAVE THE SHELF SPACE FOR THIS
3060 12gb
Not an awful card by an stretch of the imagination, MSFS is just rough
I struggle to push higher graphics in VR on my 3090 and that's got 24GB
I think even 4090s struggle, and 5090s are too busy melting their own power connectors to count
I want at least somewhat medium graphics
And 4k is just
Too much
Oh damn a 9060xt can actually fit in my case
Okay that is actually one I might get
The nose looks wrong admittedly, but also idk if you could really get it any better with lego
Can I get one
I haven't built a Lego set in years
sadly always the way when they start appointing consultants to run the company
Of course the ONE TIME I can't look at the replay is when I land with the Caravelle (that has god awful visibility), passing pretty much above Rome's city center
(most stable Caravelle approach btw)
as usual it bugs out after landing, it sets the chocks by itself and the only way to fix it is to reload the plane (but that will kill the replay), so before doing that I saved the replay, or at least that's what Xplane wanted me to think
because at the end I had nothing π
this is so annoying, I wanted to get some footage and I wanetd to edit it a bit and post it as a YouTube video
I guess that idea is gone
how very beautiful
At least the V2 will be a free upgrade, fine with me then
Still kinda annoying that once it releases it will be day 1 with 0 liveries all over again
Only the -500 is avail as of now right
Yeah
It says the 733 and 734 will enter final testing as soon as they release the new 735 update
I'd say we'll see them in 1-2 months?
Yoooooo
That's excellent
Once V2 drops it might geninuely be time to look into it
Tbh I'll probably buy the whole thing once the 733 and 734 drop
I liked the 735, and they did have a few update since I last used it
And the 733/734 freighters will be incredibly useful
Question is how much for the entire package
The full price doesn't change iirc
Still $120 for all variants
Alternatively $45 per variant if you want to buy them separately (plus I think freighters are like $10-$15 additionally?)
Or a subscription (gives you all variants too), $5 per month or $50 per year
Not too shabby
Yeah, I think it's great
I'll be keeping my eye on
Did a one month a while ago, but it wasnt ready. May try again after update.
Well, there goes any interest I had in ToLiss products
Ah excellent
that is a wonderful excuse to set sail in search for their Xplane product
I have my Tricorn hat ready
WATCH A SLIGHTLY LESS CRAPPIER VERSION OF THIS ON ODYSEE: https://odysee.com/@postscriptreal:e/Gabe-Newell-on-Piracy-(Full-Version-HQ):2
This is the un-abridged, web-exclusive version of ABC Good Game's interview with Gabe Newell, which contains the full version of Gabe's take on Anti-piracy.
Despite what the title and YouTube says, this video ...
sooner or later more people will realize
(sorry)
Oh hell yeah more free xplane planes
That's of course not nice, but also, nothing you can do if the rule is in the EULA and does't break any laws (which I doubt that does). It's generally a bad idea playing from several different devices if they all get moved around. I doubt it's just ToLiss even. I'm 100% sure that if Steam noticed that my account is being used by one computer in Dubai, another computer in Moscow, and a third computer that gets moved all around the world, it'd be deleted quite quickly
The EULA is quite bad and contradictory at points
Also using a VPN in China... obviously everyone does it there, but voicing that you do isn't a good idea, cause that'll get you a fine at the very least
Really they could've responded to tickets better of course (although if you send 18 support tickets about the same issue, I'd say being simply disregarded is very much expected), but also, considering the usage of a VPN, I don't think there'd be any way to prove that all the devices were used by the same person
Don't remember who asked about that
Btw
They said the release is planned this month
Initially marketplace-only though
4 engines?
The L-1011 is one of the planes that were build with the ability to transport an engine in mind
747s can do the same, carrying an unfunctional 5th engine uner the wing
Mostly done because back in the day there were no other options since no freighters could carry an engine like that, plus even now it's still easier to just use a regular flight if needed instead of sending a dedicated freighter
Does anyone know of any decent MSFS scenery for Palmdale regl?
That's where 1011s were built and it'll be a pain starting each delivery from a default airport
Celebrating the biggest flight sim convention to date, weβre happy to attend the show in Lelystad, Netherlands, from March 21β22, 2026. If youβre visiting the event, be sure to stop by booth 52 to try the FA50 yourself.
If you want to follow the development of the FA50, join us on Discord:
https://getcontrail.com/discord
Note: This is no...
Not scat airlines
I'm gonna do this
@rustic charm lmk when u tried the 73 out
Alright
I'm waiting for now until they release the full one
Cause I hope they adjust the prices
hope it drops this month
Cause they support direct payments from Russian cards (which is honestly really nice), but when they last set it up, the exchange rate was higher so it ends up being $130 now instead of $120
Hopefully
arent they a russian company?
Well
Kinda
They're Russian themselves
But they're actually based in the UAE
ah
not that it matters
i was just confused why they would put a tax on russian cards if they're russian emselves
It's probably not a tax
They set a price at one point
Looked at the conversion rate of $120, rounded to the next 100
Ended up with 10800
Then the exchange rate changed
Although tbf
It's trending up again
$120 was consistently between 9000 and 9400 for the past couple of months
But now in March it started climbing and today it's shown as 10200
So it kinda feels like I should get the thing before the rate becomes even worse and they raise the price 
Go say hi
Doubt they'll like having an unannounced guest like that
Tell them they like the product
I don't even have it right now lol
I've played it a couple times on release, then a couple times half a year after
We've joked with a friend of mine that we should go and visit Leonardo
and tell them to make a DC-9 
and the analogue MD82 cockpit
At least those are planned now at some point
Also MD-81s (basically 82s but with the original cockpit iirc) and MD-87 (short boi)
I think we even found out where they are, I think they're in Sardinia somewhere
we saw the building in google maps lol
Shouldn't they have an address on their website?
I think so yes
Anyone who sells anything online is supposed to have a contact address I'm pretty sure
Yep
was just about to say, it wasn't hard to find
it was clearly an office-y building
Yeah, not surprising
so definitely no doxxing or anything like that
Flight sim devs usually would have some kind of office
Only small devs would work from home
yeah makes sense
Leonardo open up
hahah yeah that's it π
Inibuilds doesn't have the address
Pretty sure they're also in Dubai somewhere
Tbh their main office may be there
Pmdg is in vegas
I'm pretty sure they started out there
But also their research trips start from Dubai from what I've seen
Here's pmdg
Right, Hughes parkway
Open up and make the damn 747 faster
I remember they were on a street named after one of the big aviation names
Well, JF is somewhere in London too
Aerosoft and FSS are in Germany, idk where exactly
Drzewiecki is in Poland
Drzewiecki Design
Never heard of them
Makes good airports
He made the Boeing locations (BFI, RNT, PAE) which are considered some of the highest-quality MSFS sceneries
Which one is JF
Pmdg r rich bastards
If you want to be pedantic we aren't based anywhere anymore
As we're all remote
But our HQ was in Huntingdon
If you don't mind me asking, how "close" are JT and JF?
Well, I doubt the same people work on trains and planes
We're entirely seperate development teams
Guys he's defecting to the other side!!!!!!!!
Nah jk cool Alaska freighter tho
love the old condor livery sm
thomas cock
parellel landing with another player
still the coolest feature of sayintentions
it has proper MP
@reef isle I see everything
I am the all knowing eye
Also me who didn't know where the dome light was on the 737
There is a sale on at IL2. Im not going to participate, I do love it, but dont fly the content I already own enough.
Anybody knows the routes on which Dan Air flew BAe 146s?
Yesn't
I did look into it some time ago but I can't relly remember at the moment
oh wait
I asked a guy on Instagram to send the TT and he did
give me a sec
Please don't do that again, "yesn't" is the scariest possible answer you can get when researching flights 
That's really nice
I know they at least had them going to Innsbruck cause I am very sure I've seen a picture of one there
But other than that, idk
my god
I'm such a boomer
I can't use instagram at all
Noo, I got confused sorry
that was Air UK
huh
Air UK from 1988. They were now a BAe146 operator but on a small scale just then. Predominantly a Fokker 27 airline but with the Shorts360 putting in growing appearances. The 146 is dedicated to feeding AMS from EDI, GLA and NCL - KLM appreciating the volumes of feed the combo could push through the Schiphol hub. And a 146 was dedicated to the 4...
178
Ah
Well, still gonna be useful
here you should have the Dan Air stuff
they're not complete unfortunately
I have some memories of fidning Dan Air stuff though
Better than nothing
and I'll go crazy if I don't find them again
before the 146 sadly
F28 is in there though
Well even before the 146s is still useful cause I plan to eventually have a Dan Air 727 too
Think that's too early for 727s too sadly
and yes I was specifically looking for Dan Air 727 stuff
because they were one of the very few operators to actually use CIV-A
Fair
guys I'm going to belgrade
Could have 727s, but too early for 146s
Just checked and no
I think the 146-100 first flew in 1981
And the -300 was in 1988 iirc
there is a shit ton of turbulence rn
Maybe your only option is the few pages in the Ebay announcments
Yeah, I guess lol
I remember using these
Plus the good old 'look at pictures, fly there from the base airport'
yes
Tbh I somehow find it easier to find timetables for the US
Dan-Air route network, 1986
The Dan-Air scheduled route network from a 30 March 1986 timetable.
London Gatwick-based Dan-Air eschewed all geographic markers for a map of just lines (year-round, seasonal and Loganair) and dots. The map is OK, but they definitely could have given more space to their domestic routes - the routes around Bristol, Cardiff, Guernsey and Jersey are really quite dense - instead of their far-flung continental services.
Dan-Air merged with British Airways in 1992.
Source: Air, Land and Sea on Flickr
-# #Dan-Air #route map #1986
Maybe it's cause there's the northwest airlines archive which has timetables for literally everything Northwest bought out, and that makes up pretty much half of the interesting old airlines lol
haha yes, I found that some time ago and it's excellent
also you can get most of the 2000s timetable from the big 3 using internet archive
Northwest? Check. Hughes? Check. Republic? Check. Southern? Check
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_vf5X0Br-i/?igsh=MWgzZTJpeGdsdWthYQ==
Maybe you can ask this guy to send the whole TT
Dan Air (London) scheduled service vintage timetable, 1991. Dan Air was founded in 1953 and was eventually merged with British Airways in 1992. This great timetable includes seating plans and an advert for free helicopter transfers for Elite (Club) class passengers landing in Nice. #danair #airlinememorabilia #airlinecollectibles #aircraft #avia...
Northwest archive is so good it even has tons of KLM timetables lol
Hmm could be worth a try
Well tbh for the 2000s it wasn't big 3 yet, it was big 6 XD
Oh
I forgot the 146 actually has failures
That's cool
Yes absolutely
absolute gem
Pretty little thing
My favourite cockpit is still the MD-11, but damn they did good with this thing
what's the localizer frequency at belgrade 30R?
Oh right
I forgot this thing has a very weird AP
Which allows you to use the VS mode... but not to set VS
responsible financial decisions
The 343 is fun
Except every time I fly it, something happens
I think literally my 3 latest 340-300 flights were unsuccessful
First was a BWIA delivery overnight, got some internal issue (felt like WASM, but it didn't give me the orange screens) that made me unable to use any controls
Second was a Cathay delivery to Kai Tak, also overnight, and in the morning I realised I forgot to install the airport
Third was the re-attempt of Cathay, which ended up the same as the BWIA delivery
You can change it using either sync mode or using the pitch datum switch on the pedestal
It's quirky but fun
I definitely recommend having sync mode bound to something you can easily press
Basically in "sync mode" the autopilot remains active behind the scenes, but there are some clutches that engine and prevent the autopilot from moving the controls, so basically you have manual control of the aircraft even though the autopilot is active.
You can use this to either quickly take control if the A/P is reacting badly, or to quickly change the "datums", or basically the values you'd normally set on an MCP
No, it's fully active and "it thinks" it's controlling the plane, but there's a mechanical clutch that prevents it from acting on the controls
Now
I'm even more convinced
That the UK's best engineers were working on the plane
Then got tired
Grabbed a pint
And another pint
And another
Then came back and started working on the AP
good enough, let's wait 10 years, stick some of whatever Boeing used for the 737 classic or whatever inside the cockpit, throw the extra switches whenever there's s little bit of space, maybe give it slight better engines or something IDK and let's call it "RJ"

Like, the 146 honestly feels very good, it's a brilliant design all round, I love the cockpit etc, but the AP is just... all I can say is "Why?"
Didn't the trident have autoland
I think the 1011 was the first airliner which had all of its variants equipped with autoland from the beginning?
If you consider the development hell it went through (probably was developed by at least 483 different companies that went through 38373 ownership and leadership changes - and it was the least messy British '70-80s project), and you keep in mind how much that delayed the whole thing, and compare its autopilot system to something like the DC-9, F28 or the early 727s, it's not that bad
Now only if there was a good model of the trident...
Thatcher?
Not just her
The UK aerospace industry was a big mess from the late '60s until basically the late '80s early '90s
TSR2
The UK aerospace industry was basically...
We can stay here and name a thousand different projects that were all sorts of messed up by that climate
They had an amazing great start and early lead with the Comet and the proceeded to immediately throw all of that away
"Here, have a comet, we invented the jet age, now lets just make sure we don't have a single fully normal project from now on"
Exactly
More like the government was
"cool plane you have there, but it's too expensive so we're gonna end the project so I can fund my vacation"
I'm sure in no small part the US had a role, since basically, the net result of all of that was that (comparatively) the US became THE big aerospace giant, which wasn't true at all in the post-WWII period and even into the '50s
I mean, the one-eleven was kinda okay, the trident wasn't too bad (cause it was essentially a Boeing), and the concorde was okay too
Well, the trident could have been just a better 727, with a huge lead on it
But BEA said "no, it must be small"
Yep
The 1-11 was good enough for us to want to produce it during communism so yeah
And it was a 727 but a bit less
Yeah, unfortunately
Did y'all know Tarom had 707's
So in the end the 727 just ended up being much more popular and flown in like 70% of countries
Meanwhile the trident? The UK, uhh... yes
China
Even BA's South African subsidiary, during the commonwealth times, went for the 727s
While BA itself had tridents
Bleh that sucks, sorry to hear its caused difficulty. I know ini aircraft can sorta be like that sometimes, prominent WASM crashes. I had one in the a350 a few weeks ago, init req and it wasm'd and altf4ed to go do something else cause cba reloading the whole sim ect
Well, the 1-11 and the 146 are the only "post-comet" British planes that had any sort of impact on a world scale, and both of them were very much outclassed by the competition, merely the DC-9, (later on the 737-200), and the 146 managed to be somewhat successful just because it filled a niche that was small enough that nobody else bothered to try and fill
Yeah that was a whole thing
It happened a lot
Yeah
Basically BOAC wanting American jets, and the government saying "no"
But ultimately they managed to always get them haha, usually thanks to RR engines
Why did our 707's have like 4 different liveries
The 1-11 was honestly kinda cool, and actually decently widespread
Northeast had them in the US
Someone flew them in Germany
I think in Indonesia/Malaysia even?
I've seen a Romanian built one
Yes, TAROM had them as well IIRC
Obviously Romania not only flew them, but built them
It was fairly widespread
Licence built by rombac
And tbh it was a good jet
Yes, but it's s lot more comparable to something like the F-28 in terms of sales, the DC-9 (and later the 737) are in a totally different league unfortunately
It was very good for its purpose: "make it able to land in a fucking field and ensure it can withstand at least 3 consecutive explosions without falling apart"
The plane in question
ROMA
Huh
Yeah. I mean, the DC-9 and the 737 were in a totally different world compared to most of the planes ever built
The 737 especially
Which is funny that Douglas actually managed to pinpoint what everyone wants (a small, economical twin-engine airliner which can fly into any runway and only needs 2 pilots) first, yet Boeing managed to outdo them
"if it's Boeing, I ain't going"
- all the people who know nothing about planes
More like if it's Russian I ain't going
Also all the people who know nothing about planes
Pretty much everything after Tu-104 was safe
Well
"safe"
That's why one of the prototypes of the il-62 crashed
I think we crashed a Tu-154 because we just fell asleep... a Tu-134 on a bet - "Bet I can land this thing blind"... an A310 because we let kids into the cockpit...
They had no where to sleep at the airport...
Putting the engines beneath the wings and the wider fuselage really paid off in the long term
To be fair, I don't think nobody could have known at the time
Well
Putting the engines beneath the wings was paying off every year until late 2010s...
Yes...
Cause it turns out having engines that are way too big and powerful beneath the wings is not actually good
Although tbh
The 737M should've never been created to begin with
Should've really had a continuation of the 757 instead
Don't get me started
Honestly killing it off was such a stupid idea
It was probably the most promising aircraft at the time overall
Bro the 757 is so random yet was such a good plane
w a340
Welp
Just about 2am for me
So that means
Time to fly something that will definitely give me a headache 
eis1 is lovely :v
Back in the most iconic livery of all time
Oh, it gets even better, they're doing an uncharted visual into LGA right now
Perfect
EIS1 is lovely
if it only had the old gpws too
Maybe I should do this with vatsim... I'm sure the controllers in New York will really enjoy having a tired RNAV-unable 727 pilot who might screw up at any point in their airspace
I should probably fly virgin to china instead
Only have 1 virgin flight
Which is crazy cuz I love the livery
How do ppl feel about the ini a340 sounds?
Do I fly A330 or A340
the livery is pretty peak
4 engine oppsss yess
Ah the wonderful views
they're aight i think
same with the 350
ini still excel in aircraft development
Its just the rate at which they push stuff out at the moment is crazy
inis a big studio now arent they
Gonna call it a night now
I used to fly on the 146 charter for work. The pilots used to call it either βthe four hairdryersβ or βthe best 3 engined plane that ever flewβ
kind of botched the departure out of JFK a bit, the AP turn knob wasnt centered so AP CMD wasnt engaging, so i was trying to takeoff and also troubleshoot autopilot while maintaining speed and heading
though i also chose the 747-200 for my first flight back after 2 months 
Air Berlin is the second largest airline in Germany. It's the airline with which I've flown most frequently.
You can download the offical Air Berlin song at: http://www.airberlin.com
a little bit of a stiff landing, but i've done worse, especially for being 2 months out of practice
and on an aircraft type that i had landing technique issues with too, though ive drilled those into my brain quite hard
That goes so hard
Tbh for a full overhead it really is
Still waiting to see how much it costs
they said in a range of 400-500
they're gonna do another conference in june where they'll announce more new products and reveal the prices as well as release date
The only versions I've seen as of yet cost like $1500+
a homecockpit really isnt far away anymore
you can easily build one for what? 2500USD maybe?
Yeah
with only using winwing stuff
Yep
I mean
$60 sidestick
Around $200 for throttles
$350 for literally the whole overhead
The forward panels they've done aren't that expensive either
For now just missing the PFD and ND
Which tbh I'm sure they'll end up doing too
Do you'll have a full A320/330 lineup
Wow
the yoke is also in development with PMDG
Huh
ini just released an F27 on the marketplace
Looks kinda nice, but also a really weird move cause iirc there is a rather good freeware F27
I guess the Xbox players will have one now
Also we got a city update 14
Belgium & Netherlands
how bout they drop the tristar rn
Amsterdam, Breukelen, Brielle, Eidhoven, Rotterdam, Utreht, Antwerp, Bruges
i honestly expect it to release this weekend
I think it might
Also
About the screenshots
Looks really like they just used slew mode to take them
And didn't bother actually flying the aircraft
Those props are not spinning
Absolute lazyness
mscenery ah
Not that bad no
I'm fast XD
So annoying that EGCD doesn't exist in any nav databases
It's fun that the 146, which was built there, doesn't know the airport 
sexy livery
Are you sure those would be delivered straight from BAe?
Oh yeah they did
I misremembered
Tbf even when planes aren't straight from the manufacturer, I often deliver them brand new
Mostly cause it would be too much of a pain to do the actual routings
It can sometimes be more or less fine for passenger planes
But then
Imagine doing a realistic delivery for a cargojet 727
The reg I flew a couple times was initially with Ethiopian iirc
So it's like
Get it from Seattle to Ethiopia
Just to then turn around and fly it from Ethiopia over to Canada
You could just pretend you took it from the last carrier
So you'd just fly from Ethiopia back to the US
Yeah, but tbh I kinda prefer that any plane I have appears from a factory
Well, obviously some had flights before I delivered them, cause I didn't decide on that rule right away
But now whenever I get a new plane, it comes from a factory
Cause sadly you can't create planes out of thin air, otherwise I would've had a fleet at home 
Yeah that's cool π
The naming is pretty cool
thanks jim
They were hoping for a curry
Nope, haven't
Will have to once the Tristar is out
Dw it doesn't bother me
IIRC they were mostly charter too, so....
yeah
at least for LTU we have quite a bit on FSDispatch
HAHAH
G-HUGE 
Which years are you looking for btw?
I assume Tristar service?
Well I see some 70s ones, but that's too early
I absolutely need to share this with you or I'll explode
G-DCIO
absolutely incredible
BCAL has just become my all time favourite airline in history
(consider also G-HUGE, one of their 747s)
"Hmm... which registration should we give this DC10..."
G-DCIO, said one of the few people on Earth able to use 200% of their brain
I genuinely want to know how that was, meet with him and compliment him in person
G-HUGE for a 747 is also golden
absolutely
Oh no
is it time to figure out how these are different? π
These two apparently have nothing to do with each other
Because of course they don't
Well from what I could find
Essentially
When BCAL was absorbed into BA
Their charter operations merged with British Airtours to form the new Caledonian
And they did not have any scheduled operations from then, only charters
Ah yes
so Caledonian is just British Airtours really
Least confusing BA subsidiary related thing...
yep
Ok, makes sense
https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1405495
@rustic charm π
Well that has some stuff for sure
Inibuilds has their A300, 340 and 350 on sale. Any recomendations?
Don't have the A350 myself, but the A300 and A340 are quite nice
If you like freight, the A300 has a lot of it
But not much variety in terms of airlines you could realistically fly
Well
There is variety, but much less than a lot of other planes
The A340 is 99% passenger, quite nice really but not the most widespread aircraft either. Plenty of airlines in Europe used it though
In terms of quality generally anything ini will have some bugs/imperfections, but will still be actually good (not decent/bearable, good)
I've heard mostly positive things about the A350, it wasn't great at launch, but it has improved a lot.
The A340 (again, as far as I've heard) is probably one of the best ini busses yet, and it's quite quirky and interesting.
The A300 is alright af far as I know, although I would argue that if you want a "proper" classic Airbus you might as well wait for the Just Flight A300B, and if you want to do freight I'd rather wait for the BB 757. But it's quite an interesting era of Airbus and I wouldn't have anything against people that fly it π
A350 is good
ignore the people who cry about WASM crashes. turn off autosave and fly without a cabin, you'll have a joy. by far the most modern airliner we have in the sim. working CPDLC/GPS jamming and very modern avionics
also (imo) feels beautiful to handfly
I'm quite tempted by the A340 myself NGL, but considering how little I've flown the MD-11 (absolute tragedy) and how much I'll fly a lot of the planes that are coming up I can't justify it to myself
When it comes to the A300 that's true. If you want a proper classic Airbus/widebody in general, the JF A3B4 is just around the corner now, it will be much more useful
Fly the MD-11 now.
"just around the corner" in Just Flight terms is "hoopefully maybe this year"
i wanna fly the md11 too but its too modern π
(yes)
im really craving for an old plane with FE rn thats decently heavy
I'm craving for a modern but non-airbus cockpit that is very clever and very cool, but in a tiny regional jet
and yet the 717 is nowhere to be seen π
I mean, it's 10 days left max
ejets
it doesn't have the charm of the McD flight deck
and it doesn't have the jankyness of the A220 systems
it's too good
Tbh the late McDonalds Douglas cockpit is just on a whole other level imo
I can't even exactly pinpoint what it is
i pray that the l1011 just drops on sunday
Well it might
Tbf
It's not like this is TSW
civa ins my love
In TSW we would have an exact date announced
Yes, it's a shame that it was used almost exclusively for Long Haul
717 would be perfect
whats kinda shit about the l1011 is that it will release as a marketplace exclusive for the time being
But in MSFS devs for some reason just work, work, work then suddenly "Hey this thing is out"
I love how Aerosoft made a big announcement with the release date 2 days before the release for the 340 lol
I think TSW is a lot more "corporate"
I present to you domestic US cargo
You'll find tons upon tons of < 4h routes with UPS
Fair enough, I just don't find it as cool
And you'll manage to never fly into the same airport too
Oh definitely
I mean, if you cut-off at 4h you can get some decent flights (even with DAL or LTU), with the 717 you'd be doing proper short haul
I must admit, I was somewhat disappointed that AAL didn't use the F100 as a regional jet
But more or less interchangeably with the MD80
I love those sorts of flights
LTU π
TRIPOLI TRIPOLI
god i love moser
LTU flight 674 cruising over Africa with some funny stories from Joe Moser
such a good video
If you want proper regional stuff in the US, fly F28s with Horizon 
50-minute legs going from the middle of nowhere, Montana to the middle of nowhere, Idaho
I think the A340 will be the winner then
Would still like to travel on one IRL, but that is a bit trickier
Well
For -300s
You have...
Venezuela or Afghanistan
Yeah
I haven't looked at Conviasa, but Kam Air also has rather crazy prices
Well the -600s are easier until Lufthansa retires them
Which I think they planned to do this year?
After they do though, I think it's just Conviasa for those lol
Cause Kam Air only flies -300s
Well there's also Mahan which has both but obviously they don't fly now
yahj
I think they're having issues with the replacement?
I'm guessing that'd be the 777x's fault π
Was hoping to fly on one to the USA next week, but the prices weren't great
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Exciting given it's where I usually fly from
I didn't do my A340 flight today cuz the plane isn't compatible with xplane 12.4 π
Why are you doing this to me
Nassau calls me "Echo Alpha Lima"
a few days ago ORD controllers called me "Tango Whiskey Alpha"...
COME ON MAN
I'm not flying PeopleExpress or BusinessExpress
how do you not know
Piedmont?
Seriously????
How hard is is to say "Eastern"
Also about TWA, at least technically it's not awfully wrong


