#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 41 of 1
Btw about the F28, do you know any neat airlines for it?
47 early 😍😍😍😍
Once I finally fly it I'll probably do Montenegro first, but then I don't really know who else to fly with it
Did anyone in the UK fly the F28 actually?
Not bad
Going back now
is it ur last for the day atleast
Yeah quite a few, what's you area of interest?
Yes, Air Anglia and later Air UK
Anything in the US or the UK perhaps? Maybe Australia, delivering one there would be quite fun
Also really any other ones you liked, I'm always open to new airlines
Yeah just HEL and back
The ones that immediately spring to mind to me are
UK:
Air Anglia
Air UK
TAT Europe (w/ BA livery, but IIRC it didn't actually fly in the UK a lot)
US:
Piedmont
UsAir
Air21
Alaska/Horizon
Australia:
Ansett
MMA
Neat
Might actually fly some Horizon with it
I don't have the Embraers to do it present day anyway XD
Also in Canada there, it's Canadian Regional I assume?
Yes 😄
Montenegro is lovely
And before MGX it was JAT, also lovely
Ngl wish we had more JAT liveries
They had DC-9-30s iirc but I don't think there's a livery yet
You also have Mid Pac in Hawaii and Air Nauru for flying around in the pacific (I think I cut it off the map), which are both quite fun, especially in the Hawaii
Oh god, delivering an F28 to Hawaii... sounds like a fair challenge
I'm pretty sure it's comparable to the DC-9 in terms of range, right?
https://flightsim.to/file/59087/just-flight-fokker-f28-400-mid-pacific-air-n281mp
Unfortunately the guy that made it committed the god forsaken sin of making the text too high, but it's nice
I can't really be bothered to fix it
Pretty sure it's shorter
1000NM is already pushing it
history of mma fokker f28-1037 fellowship vh-fke cn 11040.
if you're interested here is the actual delivery route for one of MMA's F28s
Delivery route: Amsterdam - Brindisi - Ankara - Teheran - Karachi - Calcutta - Bangkok - Singapore -Denpasar - Port Headland - Perth
That's quite something
heheh yeah
Even via Teheran
it was a proper regional jet, it had very short range
Ngl politics aside, Teheran is a neat place for planes. Still 300s, 310s and 340s there
I can also give you a manual, that @echo gorge sent to me a long time ago and I have made sure nothing bad ever happened to it 
Also MD-80s and I'm pretty sure even BAe 146s
You even have a manual?
Full manual yeah
when the F28 came out it was the only "proper" old style plane I had access to (I didn't have Xplane back then), so I flew it a lot
as you can tell haha
I'm not actually sure where I put that manual anymore lol 😅
That's fair
Much nicer to have more old school planes now
But I gotta say, the F28 still stands out as the only old regional jet tbh
Like, even BAe 146 is a different kind
I remember doing a couple flights in the 28, I did New York to Boston, LA to San Diego and Miami to Charleston iirc
Yeah the 146 is so much more modern feeling
Despite not actually being that much newer
Deleted them from volanta because 'landing' was an overstatement for all of those 
Yeah, plus it's aided by the fact that the 146 had some early FMS for a while, and meanwhile the F28 was VOR-only initially iirc
(Talking about flight sim)
JF only added some stuff to it in the V2 update which was iirc spring this year?
Ngl I kinda love that livery
Also will start descending in just under 15 minutes
Descending now
Hopefully I'm somewhere not too far from Hawaii
Welp, down to FL270 as that was my planned initial descent (only going further down once on a VOR track), and no VORs for now
Watching you on Volanta
I'm talking with another friend in DMs, and while I asked him to not spoil anything (I'm not looking on Volanta), his initial reactions make me think I'm definitely not where I think I am
Is that the skysimulations DC9?
Is it any good? I remember their MD-11 being pretty mid when that was the only option for MSFS
Yeah it is, and I wouldn't call it amazing but it's flyable imo
I'd say it just misses some QoL features mainly
Not the most amazing model I've seen, but not bad either. Engine start works fine. VOR NAV works too
It just doesn't have a takeoff performance calculator for example, you need to do it yourself
Welp, happy days
Lihue is in range
Heading 170, 190 miles out
I'm no longer lost
hahah nice
This was fun
The 90-degree turn at first wasn't random or from a navaid, it was literally "By my calculations, I was supposed to be within the range of at least one VOR by now. I cannot be east of Hawaii, I must be northwest of the islands, let's do a turn to the left and see where it takes us"
The second turn was the moment of celebration when Lihue VORDME started being received
Then I decided to do a DME arc there, at 140 miles out, so I would be on the correct STAR course towards the DME (I was on 170 and had to be on 135)
F28s were built at Schipol, right?
With BATC this time
Well, out of good news, I took off. Out of bad news, I didn't set it up right seemingly so the attitude indicator and the vspeed indicator don't work 
I just forgot radio master switches lol
Now it's all great
Such a lovely plane
Can't wait until the F70/100 is finally out
Cozy
the lion does not concern himself with severe turbulence
Fair
I'm close to Italy too
Tbh I've not actually yet encountered a single severe storm in MSFS
Somehow every time it looks scary on the radar but when I actually get close to it it's clear skies
Delivering an F28 now, and just saw this too... https://flightsim.to/file/99625/jat-airways-yu-akj-boeing-727-200
✓ JAT Airways - YU-AKJ - Boeing 727-200 is a Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 mod created by AJP_Creations. This add-on features the Boeing 727-200 in the livery of JAT Airways, representing its operations during the 1970s and 1980s. JAT Yugoslav Airlines was notable for operating Western jets in...
Tivat is gonna get a lot of use now
Almost in Tivat, and I can see Podgorica from here lol
A bit of an ouch but at least it was on the runway this time
yes
Location: Schiphol, Amsterdam, Holland / Netherlands
Story about the F-28 Fellowship passenger plane in Holland.
VS. Interior of aircraft factory during the building of F-28 Fellowship passenger plane. The Factory is the Fokker works in Amsterdam.
VS. Of the Fellowship F-28 being towed out of hangar and onto the tarmac. CU. The engi...
On the 9th of May 1967, the F28 made its maiden flight. Departing at 05.19am from Amsterdam Schiphol Airport it returned safely after a flight of 1h25m. The F28 was the first civil Fokker aircraft equipped with jet engines and in its original configuration it could seat 65 passengers. A total of 243 aircraft was built and at the end of last year...
Do you by chance know which apron they'd be delivered from? I just spawned in randomly this time on apron M cause it looked like somewhere they could potentially have used
i havent flown the FBW A32NX in ages, i forgot how fun it is
i also finally got my xbox controller set up wirelessly, and its so weird not having to deal with a wire
@rustic charm I think it's these buildings here
Oh
Fokker has had production facilities at many locations in the Netherlands
So I guessed right then 
Hehe nice
Tbh it did look like an assembly facility of sorts, that's why I decided to use that apron
(Plus kinda no other place, obviously they wouldn't assemble them at the GA apron or the cargo terminals)
i actually wanted to do a flight today, but i got food poisoning instead 
so now im in a weird mood where i really, really want to do a flight, but physically im not in the mood to fly, which is annoying as hell
Yugoslavia!!!
And before you ask, no, I'm not doing this flight 100% realistically because I myself don't smoke
For now going quite nicely with fuel, sitting at mach .80, loaded roughly 2 tons over, and still keeping around 2 tons over the plan estimates. Feels nice
12klbs of fuel remaining with an hour to go. All things considered it should be enough to reach Halifax, but I'm slightly under planned fuel now, and in case I have to go around it'll be cutting it quite close
Descending into Halifax
i tried getting VR working in MSFS and something broke because my game decided to run at 5FPS for no explainable reason
so there goes that idea
it said it wouldnt detect my headset, yet its running at 5FPS like something is happening with VR
KSFO is cursed or something, the laste 4-5 flights ive tried heading out of there have been failures
Well the 727 is a lovely plane and Tivat is a lovely airport
I honestly love Tivat
There's of course probably something personal too with just how many times I've been there in reality
Hopefully I'll reach Europe
Forgot to arm altitude and left, didn't go quite as planned 
Anyone tried this yet?
The SWS one seems to be vapourware at this point
Well it looks good imo, but I say that almost always. And almost always it's true too, cause getting something to look nice in MSFS is the easiest part lol
modern avionics suite would be a blat for it
I love American heavy bombers, but the B-52 is so fucking ugly
Especially the landing gear, it looks like a toddler designed it
I have to admit I do find the Bear more fascinating, I love myself some stupidity powerful turboprops, but I love the B-52 as well
It's so unique and interesting
I think the US' strategic bombers have probably been the most interesting planes, ever.
Especially from the Peacemaker onwards
B-36, batshit crazy in every way
B-52, really unique and interesting, 8 podded engines, weird landing gear
B-1B swing wing, very powerful, very cool
B2, Tailles flying wing
Absolutely agree
B-17 or bust, honorable mentions to the B-24 and B-29
Might be a controversial opinion but by that point the tech of the B-17 and -29 was relatively mature and those were relatively "conventional" designs
While right after the start of the jet age you get the totally crazy planes
And even then, the B-2 is still unconventional and very very advanced
But yeah, it lacks a bit of the crazyness that the B-36 and -52 had
cutting edge tech is just prone to breaking, the B-17 was so successful because it was so simple that anyone could fly, operate, and maintain it
the B-24 and B-29 followed suit in that they were a similar concept, just manufacture the shit out of a simple aircraft and you wont have to worry about maintaining them
i also didnt know until recently that the russians made a 1:1 clone of the B-29 
The Department of Transportation might be forced to shut down airspace in certain parts of the country if the government shutdown continues into next week, per US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy
i cant wait for simbrief routes to look like russian routes post-invasion
Wasn't it like, really bad?
ew, marketplace only
price is okay at least, $40
and the only other option is the developer who i shall not name who starts with an m
It's always worked for me
Just pretty laggy
Welp, I just set a personal record, 2.5 minutes from load in at Renton to takeoff in a 738 XD
When the big jets gives you heavy frame drops so you gotta revert back to classic planes
i really dont prefer modern GA, the glass cockpits in GA stuff is super overwhelming
well, "GA"
not to sound tone deaf, but im pretty sad that its an MD-11 crash
its on the approach end of 35L
engine fire on takeoff, couldnt climb out
not what you want to see the MD-11 trending for ☹️
large pieces of engine cowling on the runway as well
it was almost definitely an uncontained engine failure, but obviously the cause is unknown
Grim.
RIP
It kind of sucks, because flying a UPS MD-11 out of Louisville sounds like a fun flight right now, but it’s kind of fucked up to do that so close to a tragedy like that
when that heli accident happened in DC ages ago it didn't take long before someone loaded up as the rescue heli on vatsim 💀
Sometimes is kind of hard to play a flight sim at the same time as tragedies just because of the recency bias, I did a few flights with the E-jets out of DCA after that mid-air collision just because I was thinking about both a lot
I feel like if you aren’t simulating that specific flight it’s not problematic or anything
I personally have no issue playing sim games after like accidents or anything
I don't shy away from games like ETS2 just because I hit a fence in the real world either
sure you got some fucked up individuals who loads up with the accident flight numbers & callsigns but nah
I just continue my regular flying schedule
not that I'd wanna simulate driving the truck I drove on the day that I hit a fence either
What really annoys the shit out of me is how people don’t know that the DC-10 is not the MD-11
I literally saw one person on Reddit claim that the MD-11 had a worse safety record than the DC-10
There have been 5 fatal accidents in the MD-11 leading to 244 total deaths (not counting today)
vs
12 fatal accidents in the DC-10, leading to 1,261 deaths
And yes, both AAL191 and this incident both had their left engines (seemingly) shear off, but that’s where the similarities end, I would bet all of my life savings that the MD-11 engine pylon did not contribute to this incident at all
Rant over, I just hate how many uninformed people rush to make these grand and extreme opinions from super initial reports and nonsensical or completely incorrect data
Tbf the death toll difference between them is quite heavily influenced by the fact that only 3 MD-11 accidents were in passenger service, all the rest (fatal and non-fatal too) were with freighters
And thankfully 2 out of 3 passenger accidents resulted in low tolls as well, it's just Swissair 111 which unfortunately claimed hundreds of lives
And overall I'd say comparing total accidents in order to determine which one has a better safety record is unfair to say the least, because quite many accidents in fact stem either from operations, piloting, weather or any other parameters that aren't the plane itself
About this actually, I'm curious about people's opinions: at which point is the "too soon"/"okay" line drawn, if it exists?
For example I would allow myself to fly from New York to Geneva in a Swissair MD-11, and if I do it in accordance with old timetables it'd be SWR111. Or alternatively I would allow myself to fly from Moscow to Kai Tak as AFL593. But the callsigns that had accidents in the more recent years I'd definitely hesitate to use
I think for sim aviation, it just is never okay at all, aside from the fucked up people, the sane people just don’t fly accident callsigns past or present
The pilots at Ryanair already have a CRM memo about the incident from some of the initial reports
They hit rotate speed when the engine sheered off and continued due to startle
Or that’s what the memo is saying
I wish I could show it to you because it goes into depth into how to avoid it and it’s something 99% of the armchair pilots don’t even know about/consider before posting on Reddit saying “oh yeah I would have just RTO’d it”
It's very easy to judge from the couch tbh
The cockpit is an incredibly high stress environment, especially when anything goes wrong. You can't ever react instantly either. Every decimal of a second matters
The rabbit infestation is back
Last winter we had 5 instances of planes turning them into a fine mist
We’re elevating pilot learning and readiness with the launch of our Virtual Airplane Procedures Trainer. ✈️
︀︀
︀︀Powered by @Microsoft Azure and Microsoft Flight Simulator, this cutting-edge training platform empowers pilots and flight training teams with immersive, accessible, and customizable tools to meet our customers’ specific needs.
︀︀
︀︀More: www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/boeing-pioneering-next-generation-training-tools-with-launch-of-virtual-airplane-302607464.html?tc=eml_cleartime
https://www.instagram.com/p/DQudmV1gfFz/
see you there

🎬 29 DAYS TO GO! 🎬
The countdown to VIAF 2025 continues — and today, we’re giving you a sneak peek behind the scenes! 👀
Here’s a glimpse of our incredible videographer hard at work crafting the official VIAF 2025 trailer. Every shot, every angle, every sound — building up to something truly spectacular! ✈️🔥
Stay tuned...
Today is a delivery of an MD-11, tomorrow I'll have to retire one. Will be the first time I fly an airplane to Victorville...
Just don't crash it on take off and verify everything is in working conditions
Well, that's actually the reason why I'll be retiring it
Thai MD-11 HS-TME, one that I delivered not too long ago via Seoul to Bangkok and then flew to Sydney via Hong Kong, after its passenger service got converted to a freighter and re-registered as N259UP...
Flying that one would be weird
it's interesting that boeing is partnering with MSFS
airbus famously uses toliss aircraft in x-plane as their "official" stuff
very key difference
I think it was bombardier who had a procedure trainer based off the majestic q400 (that flys nothing like an actual Q400)
as for full sims P3D, XP and FG reign supreme
true, but its (presumably) using asobo models, and id guess is based in the MSFS 2024 core engine
oh yeah
but these arent meant to test you flying capabilities
"show me a cold and dark startup with APU and ENG2 bleed inop"
"your on the ground, show me the procedure for RFS-B Refuelling"
its gonna be stuff like that
yeah, just an interesting choice to use something like an off-the-shelf product and advertise it
as far as I know in the boeing sims that Ryanair has they run P3D V3 still
at least in the stansted centre
ive been eyeing up changing from FSX to P3D, but i dont know how directly compatible everything is
good publicity for everyone involved
boeing get to say "hey look we do cool stuff" and Microsoft get to say "hey look we do real simulator work its not just a game bro"
true, and asobos modelling and graphics are fine i guess
they really just struggle with everything else 
the reason a lot of commercial sims use XP is because you can model pretty much anything to a really high degree of accuracy
true, but as far as i know, airbus is the first one to professionally acknowledge that they use it
you can simulate pretty much anything happening to any part of an aircraft at any one time
well they use the toliss aircraft for the exact same thing
procedure simulation
for actual airbus sims someone is going to have made something completely custom in planemaker and then installed it on the sim
you cant really do that in MSFS and in P3D it takes ages and many many lookup tables
in FlightGear it can be done but again, 1 billion lookup tables
I totally didn't post it 5h before #1165354616993632397 message

isnt it p3dv5 that's the last version of P3D that can directly run FSX products?
if im going to upgrade, odds are im going to get the A2A B-17 with the P3D specific pack, but probably not everything else
and honestly, at this point i might as well just abandon FSX and P3D alltogether and just get MSFS2024 and the microprose B-17, or wait for the khamsin B-17 in XP12
i was cooking with reshade presets a bit and got it looking 'ery noice
my biggest issue with xplane graphics was that it looked kind of flat and not very deep, so i managed to fix that with some simple levels/curves/color adjustment
the cockpit looks a little dark, but that might be accurate
cabin looks good too
Become a Channel Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR852j7ssNVhsfss4N9kTzA/join
Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/IntotheBlueSim
Donate Via Paypal: https://paypal.me/IntotheBlueSim?locale.x=en_GB
"Buy me a coffee" https://www.buymeacoffee.com/IntotheBlue
Channel Discord: https://discord.gg/YCayEvX3jX
In this video, we take to the ...
did someone ask about the B-52?
take a look at this
should give you a decent idea about it
this looks horrible, I'm am confident that's not how it looked at all
and it's just a gross oversemplification using default systems
Am I going insane, why did discord do this
Huuuuuuuuuuh
what the actual fuck
ok idk what happened last time I flew the 787 but it's maintaining altitude now
Apparently it's a known glitch on mobile
i found the original video if you want that i guess, it was from another server, i had started playing it and moved channels and apparently that broke it
anyway, plane
I should've archived this channel immediately after you posted this, it could be the next mad dog gif
I'm gonna send this to my cousin on his birthday
i dont know what it is with my controls recently, but it feels like theyre extremely touchy in xplane
like, if i pick the nose up just a little bit on takeoff, the nose rockets up hard
ive tried playing around with control curves, but i still havent figured it out
the x-crafts ejets also have this fun habit of disengaging the autothrottle at random points and throttling back to idle
Yeah that's probably the issue then
Stop changing them and get used to it
I've met a few people flying formation aerobatics that would never stop changing their curves and because of that they'd never actually improve
Get them sort of "whatever, good enough", get used to them, and once you've used them enough to the point where you can pin point more or less exactly how and why you want to change them, change them 🙂
I haven't touched my curves in MSFS and Xplane in years
I just have the default in Xplane and linear in MSFS
I used to have a negative curve for the Fenix before they changed the flight model months (years?) ago
this is my issue, i havent figured out one that's good yet
I guess I can try and help you out?
When you apply a curve you're trading off precision with big stick movements for precision around the center, i.e. around the center = big real stick movements result in small plane stick movement, opposite at the extremes
so for example a huge curve might hinder your ability to rotate properly
my issue is moreso trying to figure out my settings while also doing regular flights
i really should just sit down and do touch-and-gos until i get it figured out
Oh right, just keep in mind that sometimes it can be that what you actually want is the opposite of what you think you want.
Let's say that you are struggling to land precisely, you think "I'll increase my curve, that'll give me more precision around the center" but actually having to do such big stick movements is what's causing your difficulty, if you're moving your stick all over the place to do what are actually small corrections, not only you're losing out on lots of resolution if you end up being badly trimmed or need to do big corrections, but It'll actually hinder you in the center as well, because (it's hard to describe), but the bigger the movement you have to do, the more chance you have to mess it up, overshoot or undershoot
Although maybe I'm taking this a little too seriously for airliner flying 🙃
i dont know, its almost like too much of a curve and if i cross that spike up in the curve its an issue, but too little of a curve and its very choppy and sensitive
it doesnt help that the controls in xplane snap back instantly too, so if you let off pressure on your stick for even a microsecnd to adjust your grip a bit, it messes up everything
Oof yeah that seems pretty steep
I think that initial slope is a little too flat
Roll seems more ok
Yeah so I imagine rotation would be right around that "knee"
Which would feel horrible
should pitch be long and flat then?
fine control until you get really close to the edge of the input?
it honestly feels like i should just set a ceiling for the controls more than anything
Yeah that's a good shout
Maybe try something like this?
It's still linear, but with less slope, until you get near to the edge
Not sure if you can on Xplane
Oh wait, is this the entire curve?
Kinda like that
You definitely don't need the "S" shape
the only issue is that XP11 doesnt give you the option for that, its only S-shapes
linear is genuinely the closest you can get to that
Uh alright, and that is definitely half of the curve right (i.e. just pull)
At that point you might be better off just with the normal "default" curve settings tbh
The "control response" sliders
ive already played around with those, they dont seem to do much
i did have them set on the wrong half, but after playing around with it, it doesnt feel like it does much
you use actual hardware though, no?
Yes?
I have a proper flight stick
I'm sure you do as well right?
Or an I misremembering?
i have one, but i dont use it just because its a pain to set up, same with my yoke (but i also dont have rudder pedals, so taxiing in MSFS is impossible)
yeah, pretty much
Aaaaaah right
which i seem to be in the minorty when it comes to that
Then I think you'll probably have to accept a bit of a rough rotation
If you want to have any hope of flying with enough precision
It might be a little sketchy, but you could take off with a bit more nose up trim
That should help you limit how much control deflection you need
How much I've no idea, experiment 🙂
And always make sure you're in trim so that you're always working around the center of the stick
I get lazy sometimes especially during the approach, big speed changes and configuration changes mess your trim up, having linear curves that doesn't really affect me (besides tiring my arm
)
You can't afford to do that
its funny, i think flying the A2A B-17 in FSX messed with my brain enough, the controls in that are extremely heavy but extremely stable, so flying that for a few hours and then going back into xplane might be tripping me up
or really just FSX in general, but even then, my control curve for FSX is default
Yeah could be that, the planes I fly in FSX feel like they require a lot of stick travel to do anything at all
Which is definitely not the case in MSFS, in Xplane depends on the plane
i really dont feel like setting up an aircraft just to test out my controls right now
at least this isnt something that upgrading can fix, the control set up between sims is identical
I also don’t really want to fly the e-jets right now, so I have to find a new flight to get me excited to fly again 
I also had a shit ton of Italian food for dinner and I am seconds away from going into a Garfield coma, not ideal conditions to fly in 
Play some Battlefield six if you own it

If I could afford battlefield 6, I would already be on the latest versions of XP12 and MSFA 2024 
Though, I did just re-download call of duty WW2 on my laptop 
does simbrief give the centre of gravity?
WE ARE SO BACK BABY
no.
lmao i thought that too
Reentry is a space flight simulator based on real life spacecrafts, and aims to meet the middle-ground between a simulator and a game. You create a new astronaut, gain levels and experience for every move you make by completing missions in space. You will have access to missions similar to what happened in real life, or fictional missions design…
$27.99
882
ini updated Honolulu to 2024 and for once it's a free update
So apparently both UPS and FedEx grounded all MD-11s now
I’ve been following this for a super long time, but I’ve never actually tried it
It seems like so fucking much to learn for a really specific thing, in a really specific simulator, for a really specific point in time
I do like how they simulate everything since mercury though, the real missions themselves kind of act like a tutorial because that’s how they did it IRL
the apollo guidance computer is also really, really fucking awesome
i havent flown the 777F in a bit 
though that doesnt help me, i have my controls figured out in MSFS
what the fuck did i find
there's a place in new mexico called elephant butte
and the airport there is named truth or consequences
and it has 8 billion runways
Truth or consequences a town in NM there too
you know what would really be funny, i switched controllers from my cheap xbox one knockoff to my real xbox one controller recently, and i wonder if the old one was actually better
i also learned a really good tip, look towards the end of the runway when keeping on the centerline during takeoff and landing
you're more inclined to make unneeded rapid inputs if you focus towards the nose, which i suffer from pretty bad xd
quick & easy flight to get my foot back in the door
plus my first time flying out of el paso
autothrottle does not want to behave it seems, so it looks like this is going to be an interesting landing
that was not a fun go around and landing
i dont know why simbrief gives me way too little fuel too, mid-flight i was getting fuel insufficient warnings, and i could not have done another go-around without running out
here's a question i should be asking too, at rotate, do you need to pick up the nose right then and there, or can you wait a few seconds to get a smooth rotation?
i think thats something else i might struggle with, i hear "rotate" and my mind is like "NOSE UP NOW PULL BACK UNTIL IT HAPPENS"
and my rotate speed might be off, so i might be trying to pull up just before i actually can, and by the time im at the "real" rotation speed the aircraft just shoots up
good takeoff in the ixeg 737
Well of course you can't achieve the desired pitch instantly
You start rotating at Vr
I think normal rotation rate is around 3 degrees per second
Of course doesn't necessarily have to be exactly that, you can't achieve the exact same value every time
But should be something along the lines of that
Go significantly higher than that and you're risking a tailstrike, go significantly lower than that and you're eating into calculation margins (so generally you should have enough space remaining to take off even while rotating at 1 degree per second, but if you're slightly heavier than expected, getting a bit less headwind than expected, and start rotating slightly late... well you won't have the space to take off)
i guess the E-jets just fly that way, they are small, but i didnt think they were so small that they would be really twitchy like that
i think part of my issue is that i rotate a little bit, and the nose doesnt move, so i rotate even more to try to get it to lift up earlier than it wants to
You should move your stick back and start to rotate the aircraft, how fast depends on the plane, I think generally it's about 3°/s
i feel rushed to get off of the ground when i hear rotate, which really, really, really isnt the case in an E-jet at most airports because of how large the runways are
i feel like i need to work on just moving the stick back a tiny bit, and just holding it there until the aircraft starts moving itself
it wouldnt surprise me if the reason this only seems to happen with the e-jets is because the takeoff calculator might be off a bit too
though it handles extremely twitchy in flight too, so i really dont know why its doing what its doing
After a bit of a scary moment in Edinburgh and then some problems and a subsequent diversion to Glasgow, and then a very bad landing in Glasgow, I'm at least on the ground.
forgot to change versions of KLAX, this version is horrible
who wants to see the moon? :D
Hekaté <3
Please consider supporting VASAviation here. It really helps!
-- https://www.patreon.com/VASAviation
-- https://paypal.me/VASAviation
Become a VIP member of VASAviation! -- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuedf_fJVrOppky5gl3U6QQ/join
Flying Eyes 10% OFF: https://flyingeyesoptics.com/?ref=Vasaviation
Join VASAviation's Discord -- https://disc...

this is a circus of the worst pilots, the worst controller, and the worst circumstances i think i have ever seen
this is the one thing i cant stand with xplane ground graphics
all of the shortlines are like pacific islands bright blue
especially on inland water
its probably due to the fact that its downtown LA, there's probably some scenery conflict that means its only using default terrain stuff, because one i got out of downtown its looking like proper autoortho now
tried doing an RNAV landing and it ended horribly
for some reason it wouldnt descend, VNAV kept disconnecting on the approach and it put me like 2,000ft high
apparently its all manual? in the -300 at least
you do actually have to fly vertical speed mode apparently
yeah, it looks like the entire final descent and approach is mostly done without VNAV, its all manual speed and vertical speed mode
i love flying with live traffic
Real
okay, im not doing RNAV approaches
i tried again, and for some reason vertical speed mode locked itself out just after the final approach point, and the aircraft would just not slow down
it doesnt help that i chose probably the worst RNAV approach to learn on in history
airspeed and not keeping up with the altitude was my fault, but on final approach you need to wait until the aircraft says altitude hold, and then from there you manually turn the vertical speed wheel without enabling V/S mode, and apparently that works (i was trying to hit the V/S button, which immediately turned itself off)
and then apparently once you're back on vertical speed under the selected altitude, you can move it up to your missed approach altitude
its extremely decieving, KOACH is only 13.4NM from the runway threshold, and KOACH is at 8000ft, and the final approach point is only 10NM later at 5000ft
so you have to be set up well in advance on the arrival apparently
I’ll try it again tomorrow, as they say, 5th times the charm 
After some research, apparently this is intentional. The V/S button is the “mode”, the aircraft sees your trying to go into vertical speed mode to get to the altitude you’re already at, and it’s like “what are you doing, this makes no sense”. Spinning the V/S wheel tells it to descend regardless of the altitude set, which is not what the vertical speed mode button is
It’s borderline insanity, but that’s kind of par for the course with Boeing
I also think I just need to be set up for approach waaaay earlier than i think I should too, especially speed
I'm pretty sure that's how VS functions on every plane
If you're already at your altitude, VS mode won't deviate from it
Idk, in my brain the VS wheel is only there to control the vertical speed mode and nothing else, so the fact that it works without being in vertical speed mode is weird to me
Default airports, painful
I'll probably end up getting Don Mueang, Narita and Gimpo paywares to act as my key points in Asia
(Plus there's good freeware Kai Tak)
Yeah isn't that how it works on every plane?
I wouldn't do that
I would rather set the MDA on the altitude window
Not sure if that would go against some SOPs
But I'd feel a lot safer like that
It's the same in the A320
You first spin the V/S knob, and then click it or pull it
I think?
I haven't flown the A320 in a long time
I think so too, but not too sure
I mean, you can first pull it, then spin
Doesn't really matter
Second to last flight done
The idea is the same as an ILS landing, where once the glide slope mode takes over you set the altitude bug to your missed approach altitude, so you don’t need to do anything when you’re already task saturated
Doing that with the MDA leaves you pretty low to configure that to your missed approach altitude (even if it’s an RNAV approach with high minimums)
Yeah it would add workload to the go around
But seems better than having the autopilot stupidly follow a vertical speed until you hit the ground
I think the UPS A300 that crashed while doing a non precision approach had the SOPs in the final report
I'll see what they used
Tbh I'm not sure with RNAV
I'm quite certain with ILS you indeed set the goaround altitude
But with ILS you're tracking a beam
Oh welp
Looks like that's exactly what happened to the UPS crew
Yeah, it was basically that
The pilots suffered from fatigue and misinterpreted the PFD indications (which was showing they were too low, but they thought they were too high)
And essentially while doing the approach procedure they just flew into the ground like that
yeah, its not the best way to do it, and its probably why non-VNAV approaches are heavily discouraged if its possible to do them
They way I read that is that if you want to do the dive-and-drive you would (almost by definition) stop at that altitude so you'd put that in the FMA
5th times the charm 
im going to be right on top of the speed and altitude this time, and im going to try the alt hold vertical speed wheel thing
i might play around with it in cruise a bit, enabling alt hold and then seeing if i can descend that way
i tried it on the climb out, but it didnt work quite like i expected
idk, this guy sets it all the way down to 0, and flies vertical speed that way, which i guess would work
huh, yeah, i sort of get it
the aircraft sees you set an altitude above you, and then its like "okay, here's vertical speed mode, select how quick you want to get there", and it just doesnt care if you ascend or descend
but its important that you actually select an altitude above you, otherwise it wont work becaues its just going to hold the selected altitude
or you could select an altitude below you, either works, but selecting one above you gives you the option to select the missed approach altitude and have that set up
Ugh
Set to 0 is super sketchy
Below MDA you've got to go manual anyway once you see the runway
No point in letting the aircraft go any lower by itself, UNLESS, as you said, you want to have the go around altitude in the FMA and thus just letting it descend in V/S mode (which in actuality would behave the same as though you had 0 in your altitude window, but you don't even have the advantage of less workload in case of G/A)
I've never done that with the classic
I've always done the go around altitude just because I never landed it in bad visibility (hence no need for the dive and drive)
i actually did it
i did exactly as i should have done too, i kept right on top of the speed and altitude, the only thing i should have probably done is changed to the final vertical speed mode a little earlier, i did it pretty late and it tripped me up a bit
i found a pretty neat conversion of the aeroplane heaven B-17 for MSFS 2020
pretty basic, but most gauges and flight controls work, even the startup sequence is animated fully (but not interactive)
handles pretty well, takeoff was pretty accurate to what im used to as well
And MSFS crashed
Even the game itself doesn't want me to fly to Victorville
(Or it could've had something to do with the fact I was simultaneously running MSFS and F1 25...)
Oh cool
Sunrise on the way to Victorville
I'm over land now
Welp, I can see it
apparently the felis 747-200F is extremely close to being finished
and there's something like a 90% discount if you own the original felis 742, its only $10 to get the freighter variant
It’s 25 after a week but yeah 10 for launch I think
Includes a more modern flight deck as well
When a 747-200 for MSFS 😢
PMDG didn't have any news on their 74s in a while did they
they did not
So will it have the CRT screens?
Honestly super cool that felis finally made it, and that discount is great
Those sounds ❤️
Does the passenger variant only have the JT9D?
yeah
there's a cool mod on the xplane forums that adds (visual, doesnt change anything else with physics or systems) rolls royce engines for BAW versions
I swear there was also a variant with the cf6
I know because I was looking at air France ones on planespotter. net and they had GE listed in the engines
Is there perhaps a visual mod of that as well
i couldnt find any air france liveries for the cf6s
A quick hop over to ULLI now
When will Fenix add the A318
ngl, im feeling like doing a flight in the felis with the default xplane FMC, or learning the LTN-92
i like the CIV-A, but ngl its a pain in the ass to create flight plans and set that all up, its definitely the top reason why i don't fly the felis most of the time
i feel like using the xplane FMC is cheating though 
I'm still surprised that flight crews didn't get lost with the CIV-A
with the right paperwork and flight planning, the CIVA is great
youd be surprised how far you can get with 9 waypoints
Lmao
you can easily get from JFK to LAX with just 9 about 100nm apart
crossing the pond takes a little more, but you only need to reload your waypoints once over the atlantic
Holy shit I haven't flown to lax
fixing drift is a pain in the ass though, ive had to do it a few times and it is not fun, but it does give you something to do in cruise i guess
easily the worst part by far is flight planning though, because you have to do it mostly by hand, and the VOR arrival/departure is almost extinct, so you can't use them for the most part
not many
I swear there's a SID at Heathrow that uses VOR's
Quite a lot of conventional SIDs and STARs still exist tbf
I doubt they'll be used much, but they can be
Most of the major airports I've flown to have options for those
The only one I can think of off the top of my head that only has RNAV arrivals and departures is Sheremetyevo, but considering the Soviet mindset, back in the day it probably would've been manual vectoring of the traffic
(Plus I'm pretty sure until 1980, which is the introduction of the Il-86, every single airliner in the USSR had a navigator as a crew member)
taking the RJ for a spin in FS24

the LTN-92 is essentially a CIVA unit but you can input waypoint names instead of coordinates
still not capable of doing depatures/arrivals
apparently you can input it manually, which sounds like hell, and it doesnt do airways either
airways dont really matter 99.9% of the time anyway, you can just input the start/end waypoints and still follow the plan extremely closely
Yarp
https://statsim.net/flights/flight/?flightid=25444358
I think today I did one of my "best", but certainly the hardest VATSIM flight so far
Flight and ATC statistics for VATSIM. ATC online time stats, flight stats for each airport and live map
and the crazy thing is, I didn't actually bother doing much planning (which ended up in me having to cheat and magically refuel) because of that after having to restart my engines a couple of times 😛
JF Vulcan, take off from Goose Bay, high altitude TACAN/VOR only navigation, then low level entry, low level flying and navigation (I intended to only do dead reckoning, but failed because it was just too much workload, so I often cross checked with the real time navigraph position), drop a dummy nuclear bomb on top of a training airfield (well, not really because MSFS), low level exit, then climb again towards goose bay, start descending to do a normal approach when the controller (ABSOLUTE LEGEND, that so far very graciously accommodated all my weird flying), ASKS ME (again, the absolute legend) to do a hi-tacan approach, but before that a normal A319 needs to land, so good old VOR/clock based hold above the airport at FL200, then hi tacan with god awful weather and without a working navaid (thanks MSFS), so cross checking with a different VOR (not the actual tacan) and Navigraphs' real time position, SOMEHOW I manage to descend and manage to see the runway lights in time (no idea how), somehow land (with a dead engine because for some reason the fuel drained unevenly - probably set some fuel pumps wrong).
about 3h, 100% hand flown
not my best flying by any stretch of the imagination
definitely not +/-5° HDG and +/-100ft, let's say that...
but just the simple fact that I managed to stay ahead of the aircraft and the situation IN SPITE of my god awful planning, bad weather and VATSIM just made this very special, my very sloppy flying and the sketchiness of the whole thing ended up not mattering really at the end hahah.
I really want to get skilled enough to do this properly, it'll not be easy, but flying /A wasn't easy when I started and now it's just another boring flight, so I'm hopeful I'll get the hang of this
VATSIM Technicalities: because I'm not in a VSOA, this flight technically started as IFR, then asked to descend below (and outside) controlled airspace, and asked IFR cancellation, then did whatever I wanted as VFR, then got back into controlled airspace and asked for a new IFR cleareance one airborne to go back to the airfield 😄
I normally don't write out reports of my flying or ramble like this because I figured nobody cares, but this time it was really special, so even if I'm just talking to a wall I wanted to share it, none of this would have happened without this legend, the first controller ever that not only accomodates /A military flying (which would be amazing in and of itself), but encouraged me to do more bizarre and obsure stuff
Folk who like flight simming are quite likely to enjoy flightsim adventure stories
i love when the game crashes, and you're just left staring at your monitor like
i love flying aircraft where im the only one flying the type on both volanta and vatsim
Most American airports still have radio sids and stars as options
I didn’t know they made flight simulators into a real thing
Is that based on MSFS or Xplane? 
Frankfurt takes the piss again
Waiting one hour (still) for my bag
Actual piss airport
Marabu my beloved
I like Marabu
Cool livery
They are there own company
Kinda a Heston airlines type thing
Part owned by Nordica
T7 time
Hot
@runic hare its worse than I imagined
Nah man itd dirty af
The ife is broke
It‘s gonna be a rough 9 hours
Could you say something along the lines of "Yeah, but I'd like to work in a team with NoOne"? 
That's dirty
Although I'd say my expectations in terms of dirt are offset by the fact that Aeroflot is always spotless clean
What engines do the Qantas 787's have?
GEnx
Thanks
Will the xplane 707 have all variants
JT3D and the -120B
shame i would love to see a -320/420
it might be a -320B
not 120
JTD3D would be funny
Someone doing a flight on vatsim and almost overrunning
Nvm wrong fucking engine
It was terrible
Congrats on it being over then!
Just wait till I get to the return
I fear for my life
How much did it cost?
350€ return p.p
Tbf at least not expensive
Yeah but I dont think ai‘ll do it again
Flew over russia though which was cool
Toobad we flew by moscow at night and abit too far away
Tbf you would just see a bit of light in the clouds, it was all overcast yesterday iirc
I like this new volanta feature
I agree, it's kinda cool
why won't the plane start
Is that the default -400?
That shouldn’t stop the engines from starting IRL, but it does in the sparky, which is just one of the many, many, many, many reasons why I hate that entire addon
Good luck flying realistically, it overshoots altitudes by a few thousand feet
oh that's fun
That sounds really bad
The only advice I can give for that is try to go for VS/FLCH then, if VNAV is that screwed
how to I insert oceanic waypoints?
for 40N045W it would be 4045N
round
what
Round it up, yeah
ok so ignoring that it pitches up whenever V/S or FLCH is on when you turn on autopilot, the plane seems fine
Seattle to Sitka in a 727 done now
Can't wait until we have a 734 as well so the gang can be all back together
(Well technically I'd still be missing a 737 max of some sort but I don't like those cockpits and don't really plan to buy one)
Ah, right, a 732 would be missing of course...
I wonder if we'll ever get one in MSFS
vatsim on X-plane is more fun than on msfs imma be real
How so?
Ngl its the same experience
You get the same with shit like FSLTL js
XCSL and BluebellCSL are lacking considerably in modern aircraft and airlines compared to FTSL
3 liveries for the A359
and the A35K doesnt exist
Absolutely based
Love the A310, so sad that ini and MS forgot about it
I should fly it more, I haven't flown it in ages
It's a bit of a pain to fly on keyboard (has a couple quirks, basically all ini aircraft have them, should be all resolved with proper hardware) but it's so neat
I wish Asobo could remember it exists
Give us the -200s, the freighters, and the PWs
Like honestly
I could overlook if they just missed JT9s
I don't think too many A310s had those
But no PW4000s?
Such a shame
With other content we're at least getting them later, while the A310 will most likely never be expanded...
The PowerA Wired Controller for Xbox Series X|S offers the essential features you need for gaming on Xbox. Licensed by Xbox, this controller features Dual Rumble Motors and Immersive Impulse Triggers to bring your virtual worlds to life. With a lightweight and ergonomic design, precision-tuned an...
Tbf I'm pretty set on getting some dedicated flight sim controls sometime in January
Or well, I'm even quite set on what exactly I plan to get - a winwing/thrustmaster sidestick and honeycomb bravo for throttles
Bravo is goated
Trust
Can someone get the A310 and unplug their stick midflight...
so the visibility isn't great
Does anyone know where DHC-6s are built
As of November 2007, 40 firm orders and 10 options had been taken and a new final assembly plant was established in Calgary, Alberta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6_Twin_Otter
The de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter is a Canadian STOL (Short Takeoff and Landing) utility aircraft developed by de Havilland Canada in the mid-1960s and still in production today. Built by De Havilland Canada from 1965 to 1988, Viking Air purchased the type certificate and restarted production in 2008, before re-adopting the DHC name as De...
De Havilland Field is an announced aircraft production facility in Wheatland County, Alberta to replace the previous sites including the one at Downsview Airport. The new facility is to be built just east of Cheadle. The facility will initially manufacture the DHC-515 fire-fighting aircraft; the DHC-6 Twin Otter and the Dash 8-400 will also be assembled at De Havilland Field once production resumes.[27]
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (DHC) is a Canadian aircraft manufacturer founded in 2018 that purchased the aircraft programs of the original the de Havilland Canada, which was founded in 1928. The aircraft types currently in production or planned for production include the DHC-6 Twin Otter, DHC-8 Dash 8, and DHC-515 Firefighter turbopr...
It'd have what, maybe 3 hours of endurance when empty?
So to deliver one to Vladivostok...
Depending on when the plane was built it changes
What registration are you planning to fly?
I could probably take Calgary - Winnipeg - Ottawa - Goose Bay - Nuuk - Keflavik - Glasgow - Stansted - Kaliningrad - Moscow (probably Zhukovsky) - Yekaterinburg - Novosibirsk - Irkutsk - Blagoveshchensk - Vladivostok
Uh
RA-67284 or RA-67285
Why not just fly through Alaska?
Alaska isn't such an easy crossing
Or are there not enough airports
Even Cold Bay to Petropavlovsk would be around 6 hours in a jet
Constant eastbound winds don't help either
Well it was in California at one point
It was used as demonstrator by DeHavilland Canada I think?
Tbf in California it probably just did some promotional stuff or whatever, they definitely wouldn't deliver it through Hawaii
Also btw, is it even accurate to the one we have in FS24? Like is it the same generation?
Hmm, Iqaluit
285 passed through Ilaquit on its delivery flight
So probably final assembly in Calgary "proper" (not some other airfield)
Then Spokane for painting, then came back, flew around the area (I guess for certification?) then got delivered via Iqualit
That's all I can find for S/N 908
If you have more time look around
I gtg now
No idea
Sorry
Haha
Well it's stated as a -400 so the newest one I think
Which quite likely is what they made for FS
Also what about otters on floats? I kinda wanna deliver one to the Maldives as well
So probably will do this but also add Iqaluit before Nuuk
Oh well, cancel all that, FS24 is the DHC 6-300
Different plen
At least the Maldivian ones are -300s
flown with wheels, floats fitted at Malé
Oh, neat
or india somewhere
I can't quite remember
it was in an Airliner World article a few years ago
I wonder if I'll be able to just use the livery as it is but on the wheeled version? Probably not tbf
air france didn't fly 747-400's to Princess Juliana did they?
Time for a fun landing
Think I'll make it
Ohhh I forgot to enable live time and weather...
That's more like it. Idk why MSFS started defaulting it to off
Ah right how could I forget, even with live weather MSFS doesn't know what a wet/contaminated runway means
Are there actually any addons for weather? Something that would improve accuracy

doing humanitarian flights like that sounds pretty fun ngl
F

I'm pretty sure Samaritan's Purse was the only flying one?
Tbf those in Africa could be flying or not, it's hard to actually know the status
Especially considering their operator most likely has a very irregular unscheduled service
Sad to see it go, Samaritans' purse is a pretty shitty relief org though, bunch of bigoted pricks
I saw “helping in jesus’ name” and instantly knew that it would be extremely hit-or-miss (heavily weighted to miss)
I've got an aunt who's pretty heavily involved with them unfortunately 
I need that emoji bro 😭
Decided that this plane was sitting unused for too long
So I'm flying it from one Caribbean island to another XD
is it just me or has volanta tracking gotten significantly worse
it takes up SO MUCH memory, and it cuts corners in my flight path sometimes
i dont know what happened for it to say i did the turn after TRUKN, because the autopilot was right ontop of it
in this house we love bucket reversers
I wonder when we'll see an official L-1011 announcement from ini
Cause iirc they mentioned in the discord that it might even be this year. At this point I think it won't, there's just under 2 months left and it wasn't even properly announced yet, but that means it is progressing nicely
I don’t know much about the L-1011, but it’s kind of weird that they chose that after all of the Airbusses they’ve made, and they’re progressing this fast with it?
Well, usually older planes are simpler to make
You don't need all the modern computer stuff
Plus I think it was in development for a while
True I guess, but alternatively, you need to model all of the physical controls for the older systems
They posted an instagram story teasing it over a year ago
The L-1011 was pretty advanced, but still had a full flight engineers position
I’m not complaining at all though, the L-1011 and B-17 are going to be the tipping point for me to upgrade sims ngl
And tbf, the choice of the L-1011 for one of their teams is sensible, cause they have to do something
ini's Airbus lineup is probably more or less complete
They have the A380 in development, the A350 and the A306 are released
They've done A330s, A320s and the A310 for Asobo and probably have a contract that's stopping them from redoing those on their own
The A343 is also released
Really their only options would be to go for older A300s, and idk if that's sensible because JF are already doing the A3B4, or for the different A340 veriants. And as for those, there's a ToLiss 346 in development, the A340-500 is a bit niche and too much work to make out of a -300, and in regards to the -200 they said "Does anyone even want that?"
Meanwhile the L-1011 is probably the most-liked trijet and I reckon the most-asked-for older plane
Finally returning the plane to its home
This is my life 90% of the time lmao
Hopefully soon
Still waiting for them to unghost me
They still haven't? Lol
SP reg
Terrible news for today
Polish specific operations and we aren’t even flying to fucking Poland
Do operations significantly vary?
Also by 'terrible news' I assume Polish regs are a pain to work on
Well, what's my luck
My 2nd ever flight to Amsterdam
Guess which runway is in use?
Is it A) 18R, B) 18R or C) 18R
Of course it's 18R
And the first time I flew to Schipol? It was 18R as well
Roughly 2:30 left
Almost there
Time to land and then taxi for so long that passengers will be asking whether we accidentally landed in Shanghai and had to drive from there to Amsterdam
Welp, landed fine, time for a 30-minute taxi
30 mins eh?
10 in the end
Which is 8 too many
Plus I did slightly exceed taxi limits and had no traffic jams
Guys do I get the 747-200 or 737-200 in xplane
Both reasonable choices, but the 742 is more complete and better supported
@trim harbor we got a marabu kettle
Yes
Massive difference in procedure
flying out of boryspil is always fun
because there's no weather information for the entirety of eastern ukraine, it's always clear and calm winds
i have a rookie question
nevermind, im just dumb
this flight has a step descent enroute, and i started my descent at the waypoint, when i should be at the lower altitude at that waypoint
my american brain cannot comprehend remote stand parking
the only time ive ever boarded an aircraft from not a jetway was at KCMX
fuck, that B-52 released for MSFS the other day and i didnt make a rock lobster joke
Bruh
Try Tivat
Not only does it just not have jetways
But the stands are all no-pushback
So while parking you should make a sharp turn so the plane faces away from the terminals
And boarding there is cool because you just walk from the terminal to the plane
Looking up Russian airports in flightsim dispatch is painful
Sooo much cool stuff 15-20 years ago but can't fly any of it in MSFS
Can someone please magically make all the Soviet jets in 1 day
And when planes do exist, like 738s, they used to pretty much always be without winglets, and PMDG of course didn't include those
Still wish we had an Il-86, would like one soooo much...
Felis 742 cargo released
awesome
of course its XP12 only
ill just go fuck myself then
discount is $40 off for owners of the regular -200
Guys I need the third runway for Hong Kong on xplane which is the best freeware scenery ._.
Does x-plane.org have winter sales?
There is an unofficial patch to make the crapenado F50 work in XP12. Works fine, and seeing as it was made by thranda rather than crapenado its decent
FUCK
why do air to air shots have to be so difficult in MSFS?
Skydolly isn't 100% smooth and the fucking drone controls have a 10% idiotic deadzone on them (5% on both directions), good fucking luck being smooth
AGH
It's aggravating me so much
It's much better than my last attempt at doing this, but still aaaagh, it pains me
it's insane that it had enough energy to flip up and over the aircraft, and still hit the ground so hard that it ejected the engine core from the nacelle
you can see engine 2 flaming out in frame 6 too, all of that smoke/oil/fuel its ingesting is not good
I'd guess it was still at take-off thrust while it was separating/after it departed the aircraft
I'd also guess there was enough fuel in the assembly to keep it going until it hit the ground
guten morgen guten tag!
(this is madeira)
I thank cobus for sponsoring my flight today.
pretty interesting findings from the NTSB
I think this is more likely to be a UPS issue than an MD one
Looking at this
Incorrect inspections done
Or inspections not done well
1,000%, poor and incompetent maintenance missed some big flaws
I don’t see the MD’s sticking around for much longer after this tho
If this is the state of them
We'll have a 733 and 734 'very shortly'
Also pricing revamps
So you'll be able to buy the planes separately in case you don't want all 3
$45 for the variants jesus christ
That's cheap?
I don't think I've seen a single decent MSFS airliner be sold at that
I mean, no, I guess the 727 is cheaper, but only if you buy either the passenger or the freighter
Ah no, the 737-600 is cheaper
So there is one
The issue I have is that it’s for a single variant, and the 737 classic variants are literally just extended versions of the fuselage and nothing else
You’re paying $45 for a slightly longer fuselage, and another $45 for an even longer fuselage
Each one (I hope) with a different flight model
And I'm pretty sure they have different thrust ratings?
The -500 have less thrust than the -300 & -400
So it's not necessarily just a different fuselage model
And well
Pretty much all devs sell individual variants
So it's not necessarily something new
And most of the time it's even more expensive
Obviously we have the PMDG 737s, where you pay $70 for the 737 and $70 more for the 738
Then with Fenix the 321/319 are separate too, although as an expansion
I would certainly give it a go for 45
Tbf, I still think that the best was is to try it out with a subscription, and if you like it, get the full package for $120
Cause they say if you buy a standalone for $45 you can no longer get a subscription or the full package, you'll have to buy everything else separately too if you want more
Which if my maths is right would end up $155 in total
its been really tough, my grandma passed away the other day, and then the felis 747 released on the same day, and i thought it would be a nice distraction until the funeral, but it ended up being XP12 only, so id have to spend $60 to buy XP12, and then another $30 to get the 747 (when i thought it would just be a $10 upgrade), and it just feels horrible to see everybody else having fun because they have the money to buy the latest stuff
it hasnt been very easily for me mentally, and trying to turn to hobbies has somehow made it worse almost, especially with everything releasing and happening recently
im currently almost $100 in debt and i've considered just taking the hit and going for it, but i just cant
Alpine Studio AS350B1 - uses the Nemeth visual model
The 💩 hit the fan 😆
