#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 37 of 1
I don’t know if the XP12 version is any better, but I was on the latest version of the sparky in XP11
I can't start it
probably doing something wrong but idk what
or it could just be broken idk
like the gear lever is stuck in off
no clue if that's a problem just cuz it's on the ground
It is extremely picky about the conditions you start it up in
Make sure your fuel set up is accurate, your startup setup is accurate, everything has to be correct for the engines to start
.
ok yeah I'm cooked
is it even possible to get an ASU with it
can the 747 even use an ASU?
ok yeah no the gear lever is straight up stuck in the off position
Are you in XP11 or XP12?
That might be why, I’m on XP11 too and I’ve had the same issues your having
The XP12 version might be working, which is why some people say it’s good, I don’t know
alr so I more or less had to force the gear up by holding the gear lever
dont use latest XP11 @hollow oracle @dusty sky use the version before
when I was on 11 that was what I was using and from what I recall it worked a hell of alot better than the newest version
xp itself or the 744?
BA babybus 🫀
thing is I'm using the steam version so I kinda can't do that
cool
not gonna say its gonna fix everything but if my memory serves me right then thats the version you want to use
all other versions are ports from XP12 > XP11 so are buggy asf
you want this one
I think
if it works I'm doing schipol to princess juliana
wait did 747-200's operate at princess juliana?
747-228BM did
oooo
Is that what you're searching for?
use this
very very very good tool
ok so the landing gear lever issue was fixed
acceleration still feels really slow
I still don't know what's up with the brakes
like
I wasn't pressing on them and the parking brake was off but I have brake temp and I blew tires
I'd love to actually have the 747-200
I think I tried that, but it still had issues with VNAV
Yo
is it worth the upgrade
i have the option to upgrade (for miles) on LEJ-FRA-PEK-HND
The full route?
FRA-HND only, LEJ is operated under a diff carrier
If it was with Lufthansa or SAS then I would say yeah do it but idk if air china is worth the miles
Plus Beijing capital is cool
It’s only 4h 10 min
it was so bad, that i (literally) dusted off my copy of the PMDG 747-400 for FSX to fly some 744s 
i cant reccomend FSdispatch highly enough, its my go-to when flight planning now
that, and just searching up flights on flightradar
that's a bummer, no modern RKSI scenery for FSX
its only versions missing the new terminal
it doesnt really matter i guess, i just cant use the new terminal, everything else is accurate
it is worth every penny, even off-sale
especially if you like (and know how to fly) old airliners
it's definitely not the easiest aircraft to learn, but it is extremely fun
the IXEG is so pretty 
landed the flight, unfortunately i had to can the flight because the autopilot bugged out
unfortunately i dont think im going to get tech support for an aircraft thats almost 18 years old, so i might need to do some trial and error
Can't you fly manually otherwise? Sure it might be a pain in the *** but yeah
I guess, or heading mode
I asked on the avsim forums, hopefully it’s something easy I missed
Overflying Guatemala, can't even post a screenshot because it's literally pitch black
Approximately 8 hours left
I will admit, I got really scared
Come back to the plane, and all I see out of the cockpit is bloo
I thought I was over an ocean, and I am not at all supposed to be over an ocean
But turns out that's just the way South America looks in MSFS from 41k
An hour left!
On descent now
Another delivery done
Honestly I may not be the biggest fan of TFDi for keeping the ER to preorders, and I sure am annoyed by the fact we don't yet have PW4400s cause that limits the available airlines a fair bit, but I do love the MD-11
Decided to go doe it
For
Hope I wont regret it
Flying eco and hoping for a biz upgrade at the counter
Uh
Ryanair?
Or wizz if you don't want hell but for a bit of a higher price
If you're in Europe
Also does anyone know if chartfox is owned by vatsim?
frankfurt - leipzig isnt operated by anyone but lufthansa
train
just get one that arrives at frankfurt airport 6h before the flight
if you do that you should have about 2h at the airport 
im doing a 9.45 am arrival in frankfurt and an onwards flight of 2.40p to peking
should be alright
The wait for the train is gonna be longer than the whole flight with screening and all
It’s DB, would be delayed for around 4 years
it's this and plus
the ride is about 4 or 5 hours long
with at most 3 trains per day
im not risking that
Weird how I keep going between old non-Boeing widebodies for some reason
But the A310 is cute
But every time I load the A310 I get so angry that we don't have PWs
Tbh the ini 310 is a bit weird
The nosewheel steering on keyboard is very quirky
And also this time it decided to idle the engines automatically 30ft above ground and for some reason that loss of power seriously slowed down the plane and it basically dropped
Like, I was at 120kts at 30ft, I didn’t float or anything (in fact the opposite, that was a slam) and touched down at 100, while expected would be 115-ish
These boxes are probably older than about 80% of people in this server
Old continental logo as well
So it’s pre “Continental Globe”
That's really old
Meatball era?
Haven't checked but I believe that'd be 1990s or earlier
Probably
Yeah
The Sabena one is at latest 2002
I have seen “SN Brussels Airlines” boxes as well
But the continental one is wild
These two are pretty good as well
JetBlue atlas boxes from a Spanish barset on a Ryanair aircraft
Update: I think I have found out what the issue is, it seems like the aircraft occasionally bugs out and tries to follow the heading for a few seconds before turning back to the flight path
It’s especially bad in areas with tight turns and waypoints in quick succession, the only real fix is to keep changing the heading knob to follow the LNAV path, so if it does go crazy, it isn’t super far off
I am flying to Schipol
Tried to stay away from there for as long as possible
But this livery is actually nice, and I do need more MD-11s
Now since obviously it's Schipol, guess which runway is planned as arrival. Is it:
A) 18R
B) 18R
C) 18R
Unsure, think its 18R
Correct, it's 18R....
MD-11 my beloved
6 hours in, over the Atlantic now
8 hours in, 2 to go
Descending now
And of course
It's still 18R
So yeah, time for me to experience this awful place
Have I mentioned that I hate Schipol
I mean
I've never actually taxied to/from that runway so idk how it's like
I've only ever used 09
How is the CSS 737? Still too early access?

all things considered it's not too bad
but yeah...
it's not as bad as Barcelona or some US airports
apparently getting better
their updating it bi-weekly i think
Yeah I'm keeping a good eye on it
Tbh on release it wasn't bad imo to begin with, but they are updating it quite often, fixing bugs and stuff
I think they added eyebrow windows and winglets not too long ago
Admittedly I haven't renewed it after getting the one-month subscription, but that's more so because I don't really know what to even do with the -500. I mostly need -300 and -400 freighters (plus -400 Combi for Alaska, I really really hope they'll do it)
Well, tbh it's the worst airport I've flown into in the sim
Of course that's because I absolutely refuse to do anything that would involve LTFM
Ah yeah the default scenery is bad
Cause LTFM will always from me take the crown as the single worst airport ever, in the whole world
There is a separate, reserved spot for LTFM at the top of the list of the airports I hate
Any other airport tries to take it - "Nope, sorry, this is a reservation for Istanbul International"
Tbf I did download some enhancements beforehand
And it's not even as much about it being default scenery as about 18R
https://www.flythemaddog.com/site/msfs/
https://contrail.shop/products/flightsim-studio-727-200-passenger-msfs
Anyone have these two? If so, what's your opinions?
727 is good
I love it
727 is great, I second that
Quite a few liveries too
And liveries are being actively made
Also, FSS was planning to release the Super27 expansion this year too (newer avionics, more powerful engines)
And that'll be an expansion, so you'll have to own either passenger or the freighter
I've heard great things about the Maddog simulation-wise, but it's not that good in terms of modelling and texturing. I've also heard some complaints about the sounds. But I can't say anything for sure, don't have it. Definitely close to the top of my purchase list though
the 727 is good, but very tempermental to fly, i would personally suggest the MD-80, much more forgiving and fun to fly
Is that quite prototypical of the 727s, or more that it is buggy?
Well, the 727 definitely isn't very forgiving, I can second that. Fun, idk, can't compare. But it's not an easy bird
Personally I haven't really encountered any game-breaking bugs in it, apart from once me just teleporting underground from 37k ft, but I think that was an MSFS thing and not a 727 thing. Anyway, I'd say it's more so prototypical. The 727 is made for 3 pilots, you'll be taking it to the skies alone most likely. It's easy to forget things. And the fact that of course it doesn't really have any flight computers only adds to that
So what you're saying is that the 727 is not a logical second plane after the Cesna?
Well
Really the only difference between them is that the 727 has 2 more engines
Other than that, same thing basically
I would say it’s quite prototypical, being an older aircraft, there is a lot of quick thinking and general aviation sense involved in flying it, unlike other aircraft
If your only other experience is a Cessna, I would recommend a more popular aircraft like the fenix or PMDG 737, once you learn the magenta line and everything, it’s a little bit easier to take pieces of it away and learn their older counterparts
My first plane was the 738
Not even after the cessna
Just the first
But
I would recommend taking the A320 as that much more
I'm pro though obviously
Oh, FS24?
Yup
Then I think 737s aren't even an option 
I think the ifly max 8 works well enough in 24? I think the PMDGs work too but they don’t have any new features
Well I meant the PMDGs, I think they're not 24-compatible at all
The fenix A320 is what I learned to fly on, Airbus logic is very easy to learn and understand, and it is 24 compatible now
^^
The A320 is a perfect plane basically
I refused to fly one for over a year
Then finally got it around a month ago
And after 1 flight said that it should be the standard for an airplane
The A320 is very forgiving too, because it’s a flying computer, it can’t put itself in a dangerous situation, it won’t even let the pilot put it into a dangerous situation
Well, it will do its best to prevent the dangerous situation
It's not like it'll completely stop you from doing anything dangerous
But it has things like flight envelope protection, so it won't let you pitch and roll further than set limits, so stalling it is pretty much impossible
Ive definitely stalled the 727 way more times than the A320, that’s for sure 
Yeah, the 727 can basically stall itself
And I mean that literally
It can stall while being fully in autopilot if you ask it to do more than it can
I don’t think the stick shaker activates on an approach stall too? It’ll just fall out, or autopilot will try to pitch the nose up too high until it can’t keep up
Actually I don't even remember
It must have a stick shaker, right
But at the same time, I don't think I've ever heard it in the 727
I adore the maddog
It's got some rough spots but is really lovely imo
I gotta get it at some point
I just wish they did the freighters
Cause Everts flies MD-83 freighters
my biggest issue with the maddog is that right click is used to move some controls, including the landing gear
so you REALLY have to make sure your mouse isnt over the landing gear on accident before you right click to move the camera
I have the maddog. It's really cool but overpriced, you also very definitely need a sound pack for it as well, the sounds it comes with are beyond terrible
If the MD-82 was between 60-70€ I could wholeheartedly recommend it, for 90€, it's a bit harder to do so
In terms of soundpack the cheapest option is to subscribe to FTsim for 1 month and download the pack, then unsubscribe
But, if you're happy to spend more this is better (as far as I've been told)
And you really need one of these. As I said, the default sounds are genuinely awful, the FTsim pack for the MD82 is the only soundpack I've ever owned on any flight sim
Systems and flight model are excellent, texture/3D less so, but acceptable, and there is an update on the way that will help on that front, sound I already told you. It's unfortunate that they priced it like that
Y'all posting about these great msfs add-ons is just making me cry that I can't play msfs
The issue they had is they were first
They went with P3D pricing whereas everyone else afterwards tested a new pricing model
And if you change the pricing you'll then piss off all existing
Rip
I didn't realise the price of the Maddog, that's at least made the decision easier. I'll pick up the Fenix and the 727
Has anyone used Onair?
hey can someone help me out with vatsim
hold up I'm following tutorial
Cool, feel free to ping me if you need something
Welp, found some airport sceneries for Russia... it's such a shame there isn't much high quality stuff
How do we still not have Vladivostok 😭
speaking of Russian AIrports, I've found quite a few missing airpots from both Xplane11 and MSFS
have you found any?
on the VatRUS website the only scenery is for FSX
It was a long time ago, but I found 3 or 4
to be fair they were quite rural
one was definitely closed
Yeah rural stuff might not exist
I know some airports even in the US don't exist by default
I think Unalakleet is one
Tbf if I show you my Volanta you'll probably be surprised as to how little I've flown domestically in Russia
I've been to a total of 9 airports in Russia, 3 of them are in Moscow lol
Well, Yak-40... that means it could be pretty much any airport, that thing has basically the same landing capabilities as a DC-3 XD
Hello, Mike here - I’m the Head of Aircraft Development at iniBuilds, responsible for leading all projects at iniBuilds with a primary focus on the systems and flight model work. I have been a commercial pilot in various capacities for much of my 20-year long career in aviation. I bring a wealth ...
For vatsim make sure you can fly your aircraft - fly a holding pattern, route direct to a point not on your flight plan and can use current real world procedures you are good.
so happy for a eis1
Wish it wasn't 24-only
Just upgrade from 20 to 24 instead
Really other than 3 planes there is no reason for me to upgrade
A343, B707 and B747 are the upcoming 24-only stuff
If we disregard them and just look at pros and cons of upgrading to 24... I don't see any significant pros
Pay 1.5 times what RDR2 costs in order to admittedly get better graphics, although 2020 ones are absolutely enough for me. Then you get worse performance too. And not all planes are available in 2024 either, and with some you need to pay for upgrades. Who knows how many bugs there still are and how many airports will break in 2024
Welp, setting up to repeat last weekend now, a full milk run, in real time, except this time in a group flight with a friend
The weather in Wrangell is way below minimums, will have to wait on the ground at Ketchikan until it improves
Im happy to “god mode” the weather. I just change the bit that is stopping me.
But a lot of folk not happy to do that
Oh I don't mind waiting a bit
Plus I forgot about daylight savings again
Thankfully my friend reminded me
But the scheduled departure is only in 10 minutes
Who even came up with daylight savings
And pushing back now
The METAR wasn't yet updated, but the flight irl is going so we should be good
Things you don't wanna see out of a plane window part 1
ive done that before
funnily enough, ive done that in ireland of all places
probably the flattest country on earth and i almost managed to crash it in IFR conditions
Isn't the flattest holland?
Yeah that would be the flattest and the lowest
Looking at the charts for Schipol... "Runway elevation: -17"
And just landed at Petersburg
Sorry for my lack of GSX and that annoying pushback tug, it's a no-pushback stand...
Great area to fly, Im a regular round there
The final leg
Worse performance?
I'm getting better
Seriously?
From what I’ve heard it the same as XP11-XP12
It’s a wild difference
Yeah, the memory leak in longer flights needs fixing but yeah I'm getting better performance
I can run with BATC traffic at KJFK with the Fenix
Some people with 3090TI’s and a like 5k pc have worse performance than me on a 3080 and a banged up Ryzen 7
3080TI here
Yeah tbh it might be really different for hardware
It’s really weird that both sims have the same issues
Tbh me being with a laptop, even a beefy one, the limiting factor will always be the heating
Regarding performance
Welp, that I don’t
I’ve got 8GB
I’ll have to move over eventually anyway
Cause I can live without either an A343, all 747s or a 707, but not without all of those
I was using my full 8GB on MSFS2020 ultra and XP11 but for some reason coming over to XP12 it just decided to run at a steady 6GB under load
But I have no clue why
lmao
But some people say it’s worse performance despite the fact I have fewer stutters and drops in performance
Also runs at a steady 40-60 depending on the aircraft and scenery
Which other plane will let you take off with flaps 17 and still require a rotation speed of 162 knots
First time I'm flying it loaded too, so can't wait to do something close to mach 1 on approach
Follow us on https://www.twitch.tv/shadowdisplayteam
#dcs #aerobatics #msfs #msfs2020 #dcsworld #flightsimulator #spitfire #mb339
Our first public appeareance at an airshow
Just over an hour to Princess Juliana now
New F33
Over Russia already, soon will start descending into Moscow
To be honest if I pushed it a bit I would've probably been able to do it in 2 legs, Hamburg - Novosibirsk - Khabarovsk
But since I set up for Moscow, it's gonna be Hamburg - Moscow - Krasnoyarsk - Habarovsk I reckon
Descending now
Doing 114kts on approach. Established early too. By the schedule, a 777-300ER and an A330-300 should be right behind me. The ATC is either crying or packing up to quit.
This is the first landing during which I didn't have to use either reversers or brakes
Literally just spoilers
Almost looks like sector 3 at COTA lol
Tbf That not a normal Moscow approach, I gave myself a bunch of delay vectors
Wanted to not exceed -1200fpm
But it looks quite realistic for Moscow lol
Ok so from what I understand the CIVA is actually pretty simple
Like you just input coordinates instead of waypoints basically
Yeah
It’s very simple
You have several slots for waypoints, you just input coordinates directly
Normally it will automatically cycle through them
Once it reaches the last activated waypoint (so either the 9th if all slots are filled, or whichever one is the last non-0 waypoint) and passes it, just turns back towards the very first one
It’s actually kind of awesome in that you can input custom waypoints that way too
And if your doing an oceanic route, the waypoint names are traditionally just the coordinates, which makes it even easier
People still play FSX? 😂
Sadly not although i miss the missions system
Leg 2, Moscow to Krasnoyarsk
Also at least I found some sceneries
Ngl, I really forced myself to just dig through and find some freeware that would look remotely good, otherwise I wouldn’t be delivering this plane at all
But now will at least be able to do flights between Khabarovsk, Vladivostok and Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk
I mean, if I go for pre-Covid (and obviously pre-2022) timetable, can even do flights to Sapporo and Tokyo cause I think Aurora did those
Then at some point once I buy it, I can deliver the CSS 735. A Classic would be able to make it from Anchorage to Vladivostok empty I’m pretty sure, so that delivery would even be simpler
Yeah I'm not sure what happened here
Why could the plane have turned away and started descending
Time to restart I guess
The legendary B-17 Flying Fortress is being recreated for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 and 2020. Developed with Hangar Thirteen and the 100th Bomb Group Foundation, this add-on brings high realism and attention to detail.
Expect a high-fidelity flight model, hand-crafted 4K PBR textures, authentic sounds recorded from real aircraft, complex ...

Ferrying my new F33 from WA to BC KBLI next stop
that reminds me, i did a little scoot in the A2A comanche last night
i'm an A2A fanboy now, their accu-sim stuff is literally second to none, both FSX and MSFS
it literally physically simulates each engine cylinder
the part I struggle with the most with GA flying is flight plans, there is literally so many options I have no idea where i want to fly
Just pick whatever seems the most interesting at the time
GA means you'll basically have no limits
You can land pretty much anywhere
I guess the only thing off limits would be some big airports, like Heathrow, cause no way a GA plane is getting a slot there
That said, those would be still quite rare, cause even LaGuardia accepts GA planes
that's the weird part, because your range is extremely limited, and you kind of have to come up with airports that are small enough to take GA aircraft, but big enough to be represented in MSFS at least somewhat accurately
i think the comanche has GPS options, but i like flying old school with VORs and headings, which kind of limits the range too
Well it doesn't really have to be small enough, the majority of international airports would still accept you I think, it's just the really slot-locked ones like EGLL that would be off limits
Now descending into Krasnoyarsk
the jurassic world thing is only for FS2024 :(
volanta is doing an event with it too
That's a shame tbh
115kts on approach today
Yesterday was 114
I love flying the 319 light 

VOR flying is so much fun
it works so well and is so accurate and good
oops, you accidentally put 285 on the dial instead of 286? your going to the next state over to catch the radial now
literally 1mm off on the course dial and you're left confused
Thanks!
👍🏿
i dont know any other freeware
but if you're willing to put down $50 id recommend the FENIX A320
best plane addon for MSFS
and probably one of the fairest priced
Nah I already read about the fly by wire a32nx and thought about it, thank You very much!
A2A and blacksquare are absolutely the best ga in the sim, with a2a taking the crown
I'm wondering at what point I should take the leap from flying my Cesna to something bigger
I can generally not crash now
Try the a2a Comanche if you want a faster small ga plane
If you want big ga, the blacksquare starship is probably the best in sim
i think im just going to slap the GTN750 in it or something
i know how to actually operate that, the older GPS options are still pretty confusing
nevermind, GNS430 isnt too bad
far more accurate than trying to go VOR to VOR too
and still low tech enough to where i dont feel like im cheating 
not exactly from the same era as the aircraft, but still old enough to where it it would kind of naturally be in a modern indepedently owned PA-24
for some reason i almost stalled out while cruising?
over time im bleeding off speed, i got down to 98knots before i decided to quit, because nothing i did was working, i couldnt regain speed even though i was at 9,000ft and changing mixture and prop settings
ive only ever flown cessnas and stuff, never an aircraft with a prop control
i am starting to hate GA flying
found it, carb heat wasnt on, so there was literally no manifold pressure because of icing
i sort of get the concept of prop control now too after watching a tutorial, its all about sort of balancing manifold pressure with rpms
9,000ft is way too high for fully loaded too
I generally like cruising at 5000 or 6000 ish with it, you get quite good cruise speed and good views
And back in the cute plane today too
Final leg of the delivery, Krasnoyarsk (UNKL) to Khabarovsk (UHHH)
Nice ICAO lmao
Yeah
FSS 727 is pretty decent 👍
Dark
https://fselite.net/content/black-square-tbm-850-gets-new-update/
One of my favourite GA aircraft, good to see it getting more love.
The 727 refuses to activate for some reason
they did a few updates within the last few months, might be related to that idk
Well tbf I haven't updated it in a while
So it might also be related to that
Just got the newest version, time to see
Nope, it still ain't wanna
Although I don't really know if I'm even using the right key
It's the same thing I put into contrail, right?
Actually wait
The error is "Could not reach servers"
...don't tell me FSS servers for whichever reason are inaccessible in Dubai
going to see how many missions i can get done with the midnight miss 
previous attempts at a career mode have been mired by issues, both accidental and bugs
Back in the cute plane
12th flight in the 319
Meanwhile the 320 has 6, the 321 has 5, the 310 has 2 and the 380 has 1
Well
I can say where every single other airbus is
A300: just haven't bought it yet, kinda interested in the B4 more than the -600 so waiting for JF
A318: doesn't exist
A320neo: waiting for Fenix to do theirs
A321neo/LR/XLR: no XLR, no LR, FSL 21N exists but I already started with Fenix, so waiting for theirs. Plus it'll be cheaper in the end probably
A330: doesn't exist
A340: doesn't exist yet, waiting for Aerosoft/Toliss with the -600 and ini with the -300
A350: I ain't paying $80 for something that I'll probably only fly 3 times just because I did fly on one with Aeroflot once
What's this? https://a330.aerosoft.com/
Aerosoft A330 for Microsoft Flight Simulator » Impressive 3D Model ✓ Flight Dynamics ✓ Autopilot Modes ✓ Find out now!
Oh no, that doesn't equal to 'exists'
That equals to 'shows up occasionally in nightmares'
Oh wait no, that's the new one
Well
It's the neo
With the A330 I only really look for the ceo
Welp, MSFS bugged out, so another flight now
Undoubtedly the best way to see sunset
Trialling the CSS too early for an opinion, just fired her up and on my second traffic pattern
SAS 
Where am I ?
FM seems reasonably decent (for msfs) from just doing a few patterns at ENBR, cant speak for systems yet
Nice, let me know how it is generally pls
I tried it upon release but haven’t renewed
Mostly waiting for 733/734, freighters particularly
They’ve refined it a bunch since then so idk how it is now
Although even upon release I found it generally decent
Just don’t have much use for the -500
well "older"
if i remember correctly this was fitted as an option on 737ng's until like 2010ish
Once this flight is done, I'll have the same amount of flights in the 319 as in all my other Airbus planes combined
almost forgot my rule of never flying easyjet
ive found the A319 to be so hard to land, i have no idea why
going from xplane and FSX to MSFS makes you realize how garbage the physics are
XPlane I get, but rating FSX physics higher than MSFS is madness in my mind. MSFS is a vastly more complex simulation than FSX was, it's doing CFD live for starters.
Well, with Xplane I think 99% of the people agree physics are better than MSFS. I'm in the other 1% simply because I've not tried Xplane (going for 2 sims? How many kidneys would I need to sell?)
But if FSX had better physics than FS20, considering that FS20 is direct evolution of FSX... that'd be very weird to start with
I had 3 sims installed on my system at one point & I only used 1
& now I only have 2, 1 fully fledged set up one (MSFS) & P3D just sitting there waiting for me to install Concorde & related scenery
Fair, tbh I wanted to get some older sim (P3D, FSX or XP11) for the sake of flying planes that we'll likely not get in MSFS for years to come (anything Soviet, VC-10, L-1011, Mercure, 732, you get it)
But that'd still be quite a lot of money. And while obviously the planes would be different, there'd still be a large overlap in airports that I need, so would still have to basically buy some things for the second time
oh yea, I was pondering reinstalling XP11 again simply for the A346 or the A21N (primarily the PWs) but nah cba dealing with it again
& whilst P3D is older & people give me alot of shit for reinstalling it, its really the only sim where I have a good Concorde, so I can accept the outdated scenery
& you know, chanting some spells & curses to actually get the thing to work
Tbh, I don't see why people would get angry over which sim others fly in
Firstly, having P3D for the Concorde is fully understandable
Second, even if you just used it full time, I don't see why that would be a problem for anyone else
Also the A346 is a good shout, but at this point I'd just wait for the MSFS one
Yes it's Aerosoft, but it's also Toliss
And I've heard good things about Toliss
So I'm not even too worried about that one, in fact I'm more worried about the ini 343
after the fucking fiasco that was the 350, im not having high hopes even though it would be lovely due SAS 343s
I don't have high hopes either, but if they butcher it...
The 343 is probably the airbus I want the most
but yea up until like a year ago I primarily used P3D for all my flying, I don't care for all the visual gimmicky crap that most other people care for, I get the fleet I want (which is pretty much also available in MSFS bar the 744) & I don't need about 50 other programs running on the side
The fact MSFS is however many years old and we still don't have a 744 is quite criminal ngl
How am I supposed to fly Rossiya and Transaero
tbh ToLiss planes look visually ass, but they fly really well
KOSP soundpack is the cherry on top, not the BSS schizo stuff
That's the thing though
That's what I heard too
Good systems, fly good, but look bad
Meanwhile Aerosoft?
Look generally good enough, systems aren't that great though
So if Aerosoft does the visuals, while Toliss takes the systems and flight, the result I feel would be amazing
not to open the can of worms because most people say the same fucking thing like its a tic, but im glad I chose FSL over Aerosoft for P3D
I own pretty much all FSL shit for P3D bar the 319 & its just been a good experience throughout
Tbf (I'll have to use the same phrase again, but mind you're speaking with someone who started flying under 2 years ago, and that was right away in FS20) I've heard that FSL is generally excellent in terms of quality, as much as people saying their 320s are the best A320 rendition ever, in any flight sim
It depends
On MSFS if you can't properly do a flight model it will feel worse than FSX IMO
That's mostly because of the SDK and because MSFS doesn't really have inertia.
Xplane is excellent mostly because as long as you give it all the right dimensions and aerofoil it WILL feel good and be within a decent margin of the real performance
On MSFS on the contrary, making a FM is an art, not really a science
And to get a plane that feels good to fly and hits the right performance numbers you might have to sacrifice some W&B
FSX is sort of in-between
I feel like inertia is genuinely better on many of the planes I fly
A very quick and dirty test you can do is to fairly sharply pull up, on most MSFS planes you'll start climbing IMMEDIATELY as soon as the nose comes up, that's not the case in all the FSX planes I've flown, and it's certainly not the case on Xplane
yea I've flown the FSL busses for the past 5 years or so & much like ToLiss they're not the visual beasts as people might think but systems are quite good & sounds for the most part in MSFS are alright
There are some values and some "tricks" you can do on the MSFS flight model to work around this issue, and both the MD80, the iFly MAX and the PMDG do this, using various different methods, but if you just don't bother, it's not going to feel good to fly.
Don't you generally need to write a full flight model for MSFS planes? Like isn't that just one step of the development process
not going to open up a debate about what addon is the best because im not a pilot & because I quite frankly don't care. I fly both developers' Airbus addons & both have their strengths & weaknesses but in terms of systems they're immersive enough to keep me interested
Fair. Tbh I can't even really judge airbus planes, I barely know them
Generally just was recommended the Fenix, bought the Fenix, and it definitely lived up to the expectations and feels more than good enough
I've had my ups & downs (lol) with Fenix aircraft, but now they're stable enough to make me fly them regularly
& thanks @rustic charm for being able to see both sides of the coin instead of just falling into the ''test.exe'' traphole as most other people do once I say I fly the FSL
I mean, I bought them (the full pack) 50 days ago, clocked 25 flights across all 3 by now, so that's a flight every 2 days xD
Welp I've heard about that, but generally I don't think that one issue fully invalidates a developer, especially when said developer does make high quality stuff
If it was some repeated stuff (for example if similar things were found within their MSFS releases) then I'd understand having an absolutely negative stance, but this isn't the case
I own the entire Fenix suite, I've certainly enjoyed flying them but alot of the times I've also been plagued with issues which are mostly resolved after I upgraded my system
wouldn't call them perfect by any means, but people need to stop putting Fenix on a pedestal
Yeah. I just honestly don't think that choosing one developer to praise and disregarding everyone else is right
Plus I can't wait until FSL do the MSFS Concorde
London to Kai Tak will be the ultimate challenge
Can't even quite imagine doing that approach in the concorde
someone on youtube did it in the AF conc
Also I still haven't done a single flight to Kai Tak... will need to change that eventually
can't imagine flying the AF concordes, couldn't stomach listening to french for a few hours
Tbh I was really surprised when I saw photos of Concordes at that airport
I had an FSL developer help me get charter routes from Heathrow to Copenhagen & Billund
so thats one for the cards eventually
(I mean, to begin with, I never quite realised that Concordes flew a fair few routes, I always really considered them purely transatlantic birds)
It's a bit annoying there isn't really any mention of when (at least which year) we'll get the Concorde in MSFS
That sounds cool
used to fly the LHR-IAD portion fairly often
& it was always really fun cause most controllers just said ''yea direct acceleration point, climb 270 & free speed''
don't mind if I do
Sounds fun xD
in MSFS, i land like a rock, in FSX i've gotten landings equal in smoothness to xplane
Well it's msfs physics so yeah
just my personal experience that FSX landing physics feel much closer to xplane than MSFS
the only logged flights i have done so far in FSX are with the TFDi 717 and PMDG 744, so both high quality aircraft, which might have something to do with it
though, the accusim B-17 lands as good as both of those too, i just dont have any logged flights
When will there be a high quality 717 for msfs
i gave up hoping for one, thats why i have FSX re-installed 
microprose has been doing a lot of work with their MSFS B-17, theyre aiming to get it out before the end of the year, so hopefully that can live up to the A2A accusim one
that might be the aircraft to get me to move to 2024, its releasing for 2024 first, then 2020 after
theyve been showing increasingly more photos of it in their discord, and right now theyre trying to fasttrack being approved for the marketplace so they can release it on consoles. they said there's a few features that need worked on, some liveries need to be made, but they want to get it released ASAP so they can release updates after the fact
I kinda have a bucket list of things to do to play msfs again
- Get my 3060 to give a signal so I can actually play the game
- Get the high quality freewares
Yummy
Tbf not that much freeware in MSFS
Flybywire stuff and that A330 based on the fbw A320
Mostly
But man I actually don't want to play flight gear anymore 
Yeah, that'd be about it
FBW 380 to be fair is nice
Haven't tried the 32N
The Headwind 339 also idk, haven't tried, but I've seen they've been working on it a fair bit
There's also the Fokker F27 on flightsim.to I think
the quality of your landings is not necessarily indicative of the quality of the physics engine in the game, would be my point here
MSFS took some getting used to for me after years of DCS, which has "the greatest physics of all flight sims" according to a fair few but has fuck all air simulation, still uses lookup tables for performance, etc
managed to make it back to base with 2 engines and a half-dead crew
and 7 confirmed fighter kills
And we at Boeing Field
So what was wrong?
Probably some corrupted file who knows
in the sim again after some time away
sadly not the pond hop I planned on doing, but a NEO flight nonetheless
?
I can't play msfs bro 
Just a fyi if you right click the picture i believe you can copy it to clipboard
(I took a screenshot because I was referring to the comment)
I just realized that he spelled great and greate
Would you guys say the salty 747 is better than the default one?
The default one is better
I’ve done a few flights with the default -8 and it works good
not only "a few flights", my first flight in it was a trans-atlantic lufthansa flight, completely untested beforehand 
so, if i can do a full transatlantic flight in it with no issues, it is a good aircraft
Does anyone know Hughes Airwest's ICAO code?
Wikipedia and rzjets only have the IATA code, Volanta doesn't know what Hughes Airwest is overall, idk where else to look
don't think they had an ICAO code
Hughes Airwest ceased operations in 1980, the current 3 letter system came into being in 1982
to quote Wikipedia ''In 1982 ICAO introduced the current three-letter system due to the increasing number of airlines. After a transitional period of five years, it became the official new ICAO standard system in November 1987''
Wait so before 1982 it wasn't a thing at all?
Is it really my first time flying an airline that was gone before then
don't appear to be, tried researching several Hughes registrations but all either came up as other aircraft entirely or missing
so i'd imagine it would simply just be RW, the IATA code across the board
New Heli 🥳 The 902, about to take her for a spin
Stealthy A319 now
Descending into Munich
Not me constantly flying this ultra-automated plane in VS and speed set, at least this time it's not in heading mode XD
Anyone knows what kind of navigation units are those?
And what would be realistically the closest to them, CIVA (I assume not), GNS 530 or GNSXLS (since those are what the FSS 727 has)
Time to go to Ottawa
POV: you leave a no-autothrottle 727 unattended for 30 seconds while almost at FL390
(It dropped to 130kts IAS)
All of these are fairly different unfortunately
The closest would be the XLS, as those IIRC were GPS units
Fair
For this flight I just went with CIVA
But I guess I'll use XLS for the future
Plus tbf I've never tried any other nav module in the 727 so it might be fun
Yeah, ik
But the thing in the pic looks bit more advanced than the CIVA
Plus again, I might as well try it, and if I don't like it - just will go back
I had the same problem with flying European operators with the 732
I just ended up not flying any of them
Almost no one used civa in the 727 and 737
That's understandable
Tbf the majority initially were just flown VOR-to-VOR as far as I know
And then when airlines decided they need something GPS-based, more advanced things were available
In the US they were VOR only until the end in the 2000s
And yes
In Europe they mostly went with those early GPS units
That's why I almost exclusively fly the 732 and 727 in the US tbh
Dan Air London is the only carrier I know for sure had CIVA in the 727
I believe Air Nauru had it too
I've been planning to fly some Dan Air in the 727 for like months now lol
Yeah I just gave up and only fly those in the US 😅
If I fly in Europe I usually fly the Beluga, 737 Classic or Dassault Mercure
Not having one of those early navigational units is too big of a problem for me
Well, if I fly in Europe, usually it involves Moscow lol
And since obviously there's nothing Soviet in MSFS, it's either 738s, A320s or 777s
735 was fairly common right?
Can someone just go and make a Tu-204/214 pretty please
Not too common, but they still fly
Utair still has a couple classics active
Oh right you're talking about current day flights
735s for sure, and I think 733s?
I have no idea then
Well I don't think many other companies in Russia used 735s in the past
Aeroflot Nord must've had some
I think it was a -500 that they crashed near iirc Perm
Right yeah those weren't too long after Aeroflot was split up right?
So probably a few changed hands a lot
Yeah
And that's right, it was a -500, and it was in Perm
S7 must've had -500s too
I know Aurora also did, but they don't fly to Moscow (the whole reason the airline was set up was for service in the far east)
-400s saw more use though
I think pretty much everyone had them
I really can't wait until CSS releases the 734 and the 733, freighters are gonna be so useful
Agreed
What plane is that?
Oh it is a 727
Why does it look like that
Well depends on what exactly you mean by 'like that' XD
Through all this time I generally learned 1 thing about 727s
Each one has a different cockpit
What the team has been up to this week and what to look forward to in the future!
exciting
Yeah
I don't have a payware Ottawa and that upsets me
The default one is terrible
love seeing traffic
Yeah, tbf it's cool
I should fly with BATC more to see traffic, really kinda want to have a TCAS activation at some point (although that's not something you get often)
Going to Anchorage now
Guess how many engines are operating? That's right, not 3
Engine 2 was playing up for some reason, so I took off on just 1 & 3 and did an inflight relight on 2 
Now all 3 are alive and well
This is why I fly flight sims 
Glass of wine, or a couple of beers, and I’m still fit to fly
there was a british airline
that owned an AN124
thats actually very interesting
well, sorta 'owned'
And seemingly it was registered in the USSR?
Reading a bit about it, apparently they operated an Il-76 as well
all sorts of interesting planes
Yeah
very cool tbh
Yep
And of course we don't have a single one of these in MSFS
Honestly
Making an An-124 would be so easy for ini
They did the 225 already
And afaik the 124 and the 225 have literally the same cockpits
And An-124 would sell well
And it wouldn't even result in any politics-driven negative reviews because it's Antonov, it's Ukrainian
(I mean tbf, it's neither Ukrainian nor Russian, it's Soviet, but most of the people now disregard that fact)
Anyway, mini-rant concluded, ini please make an An-124 it will take you literally 3 months to do so
Sooo, guys, what's the funniest mistake you've ever made while flying? I'll go first:
- Forgetting to load the cargo before departure
Or should I word it as "Flying 6 hours to Anchorage only to realise close to the top of descent that the plane is empty"
So we'll say that this was simply a positioning flight
(I swear I clicked load though... and it did load fuel after all...)
You're in a cargo plane how do you forget lmao
When are they adding the blue air livery 
Kinda, not in the sense that each cockpit is truly different of course, but the 727s had something like a million billion different navigation units throughout their lifetime, also Advanced ones had different layouts, also you could have aux tanks/no aux tanks, then I'm pretty sure you had several different autopilot modules that all were equally ancient, some also were equipped with autoland and autothrottle (rarely though), some weren't, and basically as a result you had just so many different options
Thing is, I genuinely input the fuel and the cargo data into the EFB and clicked load, but for whichever reason it only loaded the fuel and not the cargo
The plane was scared of the banana radiation 
And the funniest thing ever is I only realised because I was chatting with a friend in DMs and mentioned that the plane tells me that the recommended flight level is 430 (the service ceiling literally) and he was like "With almost full payload? That plane must be drunk"
And I took a screenshot of the PFD showing that I'm not anywhere near the plane's limit while at FL400, and then realised that this performance does look really weird
So I went to the FMC, checked the weights... and realised I'm empty
Almost there
Nav stopped working for some reason, sooo... revert to VOR
It works on the FO ND but my ND just went blank for some reason
It absolutely does
Also I just found out that it's not a separate feature like in the PMDG planes because the MD-11 apparently does it by default
Gross weight - 620klbs
Definitely loaded this time
Ah yes like the zoom call leaks from 20 years ago 🤣 🤣 🤣
Easier way to resolve this just dont part money with edging guynamics
I wont buy anything again from them personally
what the hell is up w the engines
Still flying
40 minutes to Kai Tak
Also ngl
How does it happen that I climbed to 2000 over what simbrief asked me for the whole flight
I did 300 > 320 > 340 > 360 instead of 280 > 300 > 320 > 340
And somehow I'm still below what the plane says is the optimal flight level
It says FL400 is optimal lol
And descending now
The asobo one with mods
Seriously? Not one of the paywares?
Do I buy an msfs plane for Christmas?
If you want to
You don't have to lol
Idk if any MSFS devs really do christmas sales
Pretty sure PMDG don't
JustFlight most likely will?
Well tbf with a sale, JustFlight stuff will be reasonably priced
At least if you want an airliner
For GA, you'll most likely be able to find something cheaper than that
For GA the default planes are enough for me
Well for airliners you most likely won't find anything under $40-45
idk why im getting a tcas warning
Having seen the leaked razbam zoom call I must say that seems entirely inexcusable.
As much as I've wanted a mig 29 for years, I think this is pretty much the final nail in the dcs coffin for me and I can only hope that one day we get a better sim for cold war combat airplanes and helicopters
whatsup
I'm a bit behind the curve as it seems to have leaked a few days ago
I'm struggling to find the full video, but here's enigma's video on it that contains significant portions https://youtu.be/FkVpxzZklLM?si=Z3mdtAROW2E4jGQF
Today we break down how the Razbam-ED Dispute has made us aware of something that we may have already known.
►Discord: https://discord.gg/enigma89
►Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/enigma89
►Merch: https://enigma-72.creator-spring.com/
Chapters
00:00 Intro
02:04 What You Saw
15:03 What I Saw
25:21 What We Should All See
29:20 Outro
The ...
It's such a shame, without razbam products the cold war scene gets pretty destroyed, the f100 with no mig 19 is kinda useless and the mig 29s only real peer competitor in era is the m2k (yes yes modernized I know but still) and the f4e desperately needs the canceled mig 23. And all of this just hurts the germany map to no fault of its devs
its a year old allegedly
its a nothing burger
It's not though? It's confirmation of razbams claims
Yes they've been claiming things for a year, but it's just been claims that weren't really varifiable
same way nick said stuff about heatblur BUT DONT TELL NO ONE lol
enigma will get his click bait views and youtube money funny if ED told him to take it down 🤣
Ok? I'm genuinely not sure what your point is
Well yeah, but it's out there now and it pretty much confirms razbam's account of things
might well do but still
Like yeah I'm sure the leaker is breaking an nda, but that doesn't change the contents of the leak
They can sure, and it does seem like it's been scrubbed from a lot of subreddits, but I don't think that matters at this point
It's definitely Ron lol, he's got nothing to lose at this point
Almost certainly
It feels like the last hurrah of RAZBAM before their modules are fully removed from the game
Drop a grenade then dip sorta thing
RAZBAM definitely did stuff wrong but Nick openly admitting that he was extorting them to get them to sign a contract is all the proof I needed to confirm my opinions
its really a shame that DCS is dying too, there really isnt any competition in the space because theyve been the standard for so long
i was really looking forward to the C-130 too, but i guess ill just start looking at other options
same with the A-10, i was still interested in buying that eventualyl
vtol vr
bro come on
what is this quality
apparently the xplane store is unofficial, and run by a guy who is very easily angered and who will ban you on very little evidence
which is terrifiying
i love simbrief, probably like 90% of the flight plans i make i never end up doing 
Yes
Because xp is run by boomers
This is true
It is also why it’s all a bit antiquated in the way the store and the forums work
razbam/microprose are apparently working together now as well?
Ngl makes sense
Razbam is an S tier dev
It‘d be dumb not to pick up a potential success for probably very little
The .org is unofficial and known for knowingly selling stuff that doesnt work and every time they update their forum they make it worse
Not heard of them banning people? think that might be x-aviation you are thinking of? Roll on the official store, but devs will chose which store they use on a number of factors
vine boom
welcome to Bahrain, 3 hours 56 minutes after departure from Heathrow
Good concorde in MSFS wen
Descending into Heathrow
It's a Gatwick reg, but I set up for Heathrow initially, so going there
From the FS2024 server. I see Career mode has some quirks
it has had massive bugs like that since release, and they havent been addressed at all
Biggest bug is that it's not a 5* difficulty
busy
Well, Frankfurt lol
I'm just collecting planes in Sheremetyevo by now
I have 9 already there lol
All delivered
lots of fun to fly into though
with traffic
i think i fly w traffic setting on 7 or 8 which is hefty
Is that with BATC?
ye
Nice
I think the last time I used it I had traffic on full 10
But obviously not in Frankfurt lol
Actually don't quite remember what was the last flight I did with BATC
KPAE - Portland - KSFO was with BATC (Portland is only there because I forgot kgs to lbs and ended up in a fuel emergency 30 minutes after takeoff lol)
But I don't remember if I did any after that one
back to Heathrow from Bahrain
& then a KJFK-CYVR later cause I accidentally spent an hour or two messing around with custom routes in navigraph charts
no nighty night here
Lucky, being able to see your own airplane... 😄
I'm in real time and close to Norway now
Between Svalbard and mainland Norway
Gotta fly to Svalbard at some point
Wonder what's the biggest jet that ever went there
idk why it struggles so much
Yeah it sometimes struggles a fair bit with understanding taxi readbacks
It never understands me when I'm leaving KBFI lol
Cause it always tells to taxi via ramp
I read back ramp
"Negative, taxi via ramp"
And I like to think I don't either
But it still struggles to understand sometimes
very weird
(I can have a really strong Russian accent if I want to of course, it's fun)
I guess it's really just imperfections of AI, I know they're working on fixing it a lot
Lovely
Never was the biggest Concorde fan (I like it, but just not too much), but it's gonna be so nice when (if) FSL makes it for MSFS finally
Wish there at least was a chance for us to see its Soviet brother too
oops
Looks like fun
fl110 and a 56kt tailwind
return journey with a sinking nose gear?
off on the next leg of the world tour. Las Vegas to Honolulu
I can't wait to fly this friday
We unleashed the full power of the PS5 and PS5 Pro for aviation enthusiasts to now, for the first time on PlayStation, fly anywhere on the globe at any time of day or year, land at over 40,000 airports and runways and at over 60,000 helipads. With up to 125 highly detailed aircraft, we have developed the largest and most diverse fleet ever assem...
XB-1 appeared in the trailer fyi
i did notice that, but because its possibly made by asobo, i really dont care lmao
XB-1, made by fenix? i might shit my pants
XB-1, made by asobo? i sleep
I'm so sad

