#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 23 of 1
It's a frog foot
Hm
this, but dont install it from steam
u also get 50% off ur first module
I have something called parents that don't really trust anything but steam
@dusty sky just trust us i dont think you can trial modules on steam to be honest
Look I would if I could
But even when getting the humble bundle tsw4 pack it took a bit to convince them
understandable
X-plane is better than msfs change my mind
1 isn't directly better than the other
for simulation depth XP is the way to go
for graphical fidelity and cheap planes MSFS is
What? That's just not true lmao
Maybe with the spamram shooting crowd they start their jets warm, but the rest cold starts
they have pfm flight models
As to the fidelity, their flight models are good but the systems are heavily simplified, especially navigation
maybe so but i wouldnt call them low
Default msfs aircraft have more accurate navigation
and theres not many people i say that will do full cold starts there hypercritical
mfs is based around navigation tho
The fc3 planes are good for starting out with dcs, though I'd recommend buying the bundle not individual airframes
how does the m2000 work in fc4 tho?
as its simplified?
i dont have fc4 so dont know
Sucks so much we've only got an fc3 su-25, I'd kill for a full fidelity one (or a10a, though I'd rather the 25)
i only ask becuase m-2000 has ins drift

Not any more, you don't
They removed that ages ago
Mirage 2000 isn't a Flaming Cliffs 2024 module
They only ported the F-5E, F-86F and MIG-15Bis - arguably 3 of the least complex aircraft in the game to begin with
i thought it was but nevermind
nah, Mirage 2000 is one of the Razbam modules that's now unsupported
yep
They can only do the Flaming Cliffs treatment for ED modules as far as I know
Anyone playing MSFS 2024? Is it stable enough to be enjoyable yet? I'm mulling when to buy into it.
The razbam stuff going the way of the hawk really just removes all my interest in dcs these days
shame the hawk failed
i think razbam will walk away
i got afgan 1 update and no one uses it waste of money like the channel map
i dont bother in dcs to much it got shit and boring
it was the same with the ww2 asset pack added A.I lancaster then removed it (Not like it didnt play any part at all in Normandy)
So if anybody’s been wondering how quickly can a 727 turn around mid-air without losing much altitude… I think this might be it 🥲
The flight was unfortunately overall quite eventful… didn’t even open SimBrief, so I just estimated the fuel. Wrong move. Engines 1 and 3 flamed out just as I was passing the threshold at Kodiak. Engine 2 at least remained, but even with it, the sudden loss of two engines resulted in a fair bit of confusion cause the lights went out right away and a sudden drop in altitude. I pulled up quite quickly but since I was basically at just 100ft I still slammed into the runway
Oh and yeah, as can be seen in one of the screenshots, I was very close to tailstriking on takeoff
How the actual hell
That's a fighter jet maneuver not a 727 manuver
That’s called “What the fuck is the AP doing”
Aerosucre

Nope, Northern Air Cargo
You know what that reminds me of, what FedEx 705 did on landing
have you heard about our lord and saviour for when you need to turn tightly in a small amount of space, the wingover?
I actually haven’t
it's not something you'd do in an airliner, but you basically pull up to exchange speed for altitude, once you're starting to get slow you bank and you let the aicraft rotate by itself (or you help it with a bit of rudder), and then once you're going down you pull to level
this the most extreme version of it
Ah, well yeah, not something you do in an airliner xD
In the 727… you just engage the autopilot, think “ah everything is fine”, look away for literally one second and see that your artificial horizon is showing you a bank of over 60 degrees while your speed is at around 130 knots and dropping
And that’s a tutorial of how you get a 727 to turn like that. I do gotta warn though - I have no idea how did I not end up in the bay.
That sounds like something I would do on accident
for real, if it wasn't for the graphics I would have never bought msfs
I mean, it doesn't have to be as exaggerated as the one in the picture, you could only climb about 500/1000ft and remain in the correct speed parameter, as long as you turn while going slower, but without losing much energy (because you're just converting speed into altitude and then back into speed), then it would mean that you'd turn more tightly
True, it’s about exchanging speed for altitude and back
Just noticed that there was a freeware Fokker F27 released for msfs
It's amazing
In FS24 the ASI doesn't work unfortunately
But in 2020 it's a great little plane
There's a Piedmont livery coming for it
Wonderful
And you can have both the French or English cockpit
From the screenshots it looks like a better kind of freeware
I’ve downloaded it but not flown yet
Turboprops ain’t really my kind of thing
I don’t think I’ve ever flown one either? I don’t own even the ATR
The exterior model is a bit FSX-y
But the cockpit looks good
And the flight model is very good
Tbh the cockpit is the most important in terms of modelling
The only time I’ll see the exterior is when taking screenshots
fr
this one?
Yep
✓ Bgaurant | Fokker F27-mk500 | Texture improvement | 4K is a Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 mod created by Carlos_Peroni. This add-on provides a texture upgrade for Bgaurants Fokker F27-MK500, enhancing all essential textures to 4K resolution. The improvement notably enhances detail visibility, particularly within the cockpit area. The upgrade...
What do you want to say with this
Nothing just showing
That’s nicely done
A flight by me and it’s for once not Alaska and not a 727?
a yes, I love ryanair
i wish there were more soviet planes in msfs so i can troll vatsim controllers
like for instance airkoryo iluyshins
I’m pretty sure there’s a tu-154 in development which the dev shared a bit of cockpit progress on recently. But I wouldn’t have my hopes up
Meanwhile the rest of the flight. Featuring the signature Standard NoOne Arrival. Being at least 5000 above path - check, this time reached 11000 above. Flaps 10 out above 15000 - check.
You can even see me being gear down, flaps 30, 145kts at 15000ft
why? 😅
Just wanted to keep the speed for a bit, so ended up ‘a little’ too high
Some proper Cubana action
So did you land hard?
Gimme reg
I’ll tell u if I’ve flown on that plane before 😂😂
It’s EI-DCK
Nope 😭😭

Which ones have you been on? I have some other liveries as well, and I don’t mind switching that much really, especially considering I’ve only done 2 flights on this one
Shit tonnes
We don’t have a standard for Stansted we just get what we are given
Yesterday I flew on EI-IJA
Monday it was 9H-QCV and 9H-QCA
Flown on EI-EBN 8 times
Oldest was EI-DCM
It’s a big maintenance base so we get a lot of aircraft turnover as they come here for a week for fixing stuff then head back out to wherever
Did the first online day for EI-IKM back in August
Deadhead all the way to Dublin then got sent to Stansted for some reason the next day
I’ll see if I have one of those installed once I’m done with my current flight in around 4 hours
My current flight… as of yet. For once had to spawn in a good Sheremetyevo! This is such a relief. I would go crazy if I had to do even one more flight out of the default one. By now, it has been around 10:30 since I took off. Volanta writes around 1:45 yet to go.
This one, when finished, will be around 10% of my total recorded time lol
Is there a way to stop MSFS from backing up settings to the cloud?
I move between my PC and gaming laptop, and both are capable of running MSFS, but at different settings, but MSFS backs up settings to the cloud, so I’d have to redo my settings every time I move between setups
Welp, it’s over. 11:49 of flight time. 12:03 of block time. Just a bit short of a proper 12-hour flight
Is that an md-11 or a dc-10
DC-10
😏
Now out of the 3 liveries shown, that’s easily the best
Lemme guess the KC-10 server?
Wdym kc-10 server?
It's some freeware dc-10 project
fs24 finally works
Fair enough just that there is a dev team working on the KC-10A
DC-10-30F
DC-10-30
DC-10 Tanker
all as a freeware project
Yeah, looks pretty good to be honest
This is 3 flights failed now
I guess trying to land Sitka in a 727 with a non-functional flight director and no VOR/LOC/ILS was a poor idea
In my defence, I almost landed it. Just was a couple feet too far to the right, so ended up falling off the runway into the water and then getting basically launched into the air again after crashing into the localizer
off to costa del heathrow
I do endeavour to do the Braniff stuff as I ended up purchasing Fort Worth aerodrome
Honestly I barely know anything about Braniff, but considering I just bought La Guardia and Braniff operated 727s to there, might do some stuff
Why not Kai tak?
no interest in investing in Kai Tak scenery & I'd have to download a route
Me playing Flight Sim be like:
Flaring? My plane doesn't have flares
Yeah those types of flares
career modes abit mid for msfs imho
i cant straight go to helicopters but instead have to follow fixed wing for a while
a really really bad decision to gate lock
I just don't like 24 in general
much better career-like things out there on the market using add-ons (APL, etc.)
I hate the VRAM issue
Obviously I don’t have msfs24, but I’ve seen it and really, I’m just not that interested in such stuff. Too many steps to reach even turboprop airliners. And for jets? I’d spend a decade just getting there. I haven’t flown GA at all up to now. I only did 1 or 2 tutorials when I just got the game, then said “ah to hell with it I know better” and started on the 738
What did you load?
horses
i have no idea, not my buisness, i just fly the plane 
id like to do a KMEM-EDDF flight tomorrow (or today, i guess), especially with my new PC and how well the MD-11 performs, it should only take a few hours with simrate
And then I can finally have more than 1 flight cross the Atlantic, instead of my embarrassing crash landing at Heathrow, 800+fpm/1.2+G with the 787
800fpm landing? That's butter in comparison to my landings lol
Just watching another msfs 2024 video, yep completely broken game 
I’m still looking to buy it around Christmas time, but mostly for the beluga, A321neo, and C-17
Though, if it doesn’t go on sale for Christmas, I probably won’t bother
Yeah same
Realistic 

so the controls dont apply from aircraft to heli
gotta rebind everything incl pitch and yaw everytime
god this game sucks
You can try the broken 💩 (2024) for a game pass 2 week trial. Not bothering mysels, its nowhere near ready from what I have seen
Watch Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 and millions of other Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 videos on Medal, the largest Game Clip Platform.
dont press force trim kids
How the fuck do people even fly helis, it makes no sense to me
With practice
Just requires a bit more coordination than a fixed wing aircraft really
I hear 2024 is an improvement on 2020 but still a way to go yet
I liked them in 2020
Dunno if they've been ported yet
R-22 was especially good, and had the livery from the one I flew in real life
Not sure if it was the same reg though
Imo, good
I liked that about DCS
Hated having to remember to switch profiles in the clunky MSFS menus
I guess if you only fly twin engine airliners it makes sense to keep the the same, but if you switch around a lot then it's a pain
You have a big stick and a little stick. Pull the big stick up and point the little stick where you want to go. Simples 😁
thats how it works in GTA, not irl 
Thats how it works in msfs too 😆
turbulence at 4x simrate is terrifiying 
it bounces around like its going to become unstable and crash
Tbh never tried simrate, but sounds like something fun to mess around with
Is it possible to hand-fly while sped up?
i wouldnt reccomend it, but it is possible
I mean obviously it wouldn’t be recommended, I just might try it as a challenge of “how long can I not crash”
just personally i dont really care to sit and watch a cockpit for 9 hours, and putting it on a medium 4x simrate takes it down to a managable 2 hours
Eh, I to be honest just go do something else in the meantime
The Moscow - Denpasar flight was true 11:49, but for almost half of that I wasn’t even at home
ive done that before, but it always sort of freaks me out to leave it unattended for so long
now that i have a brand new PC thats actually capable of running MSFS, its probably a billion times more stable, but i still just dont prefer it
Well, yeah, it’s a bit worrying. I just was checking on it through web volanta on my phone xD
Janky since it’s not made nor meant for that, but it works
when i did my last transatlantic, meta quest had launched and paused the game, and i was out of the house so i couldnt even do anything about it
idk, personally the sense of accomplishment comes from takeoff and landing, and not really the endurance aspect, but i like having a big spiderweb of a connected world on volanta, so simrate it is
Honestly that’s one of 2 reasons why I stay off
No, lie, 3 reasons
- Price. Too much. I don’t wanna pay that much.
- My laptop probably won’t run it anyway
- Cloud streaming that much? I’d probably get my internet cut off because of that
That third reason feels about right
do you actually own anything if its all streamed
atleast with FS2020, you can play truly offline, the terrain and stuff looks kinda crap, but it works perfectly fine
No
welcome to our modern world
you'll own nothing and be happy.
ive officially crossed both oceans using the MD-11
both north american oceans*
Well, to be fair, still 3 there xD
arctic?
Yeah
Although you can’t really cross it in a plane. I guess only if on some of those ultra long haul flights that go ultra far north
in terms of flight hours, i now have two MD-11s at the top
those are actual real-time flight hours too, not in-game without simrate
god that was fun
My top flight hour plane is… a 737-800
i think i still have the most flight hours in the A320-series, between the A321/A320/A319/neo's
My top 5 are 3 737s and 2 777s
Right now it is:
Alaska 738 - 29 hours
Aeroflot 777 - 23 hours (that’s 3 flights, yeah)
BA 777 - 12 hours
Aeroflot 738 - 11 hours
Alaska 737 - 9 hours
no
True, they run out of engine parts
PilotEdge, coming into Seattle.
"Expect visual, runway 16L."
"Requesting 16R for training purposes."
"Landing on 16R will make you cross two active runways, expect 16L."
...I'm the only aircraft in the 1000nm radius, for crying out loud!
Also, "two active"? I don't remember in the last 5 years 16C considered active, yet PE just do that.
RW ops, SLC landing north. PE, SLC landing south.
Literally the only good thing about PE is guaranteed coverage and frequency flipping simulator. Otherwise, there's not a single ATC network more disconnected from reality.
VATSIM actively aim to get closer to reality, especially VATUSA. PE just keep on doing their own weird thing.
Yeah I sort of agree
I had PE for one or two months, and it was fun, but yeah sometimes you got the feeling that the controllers are even more annoying than the real ones
for example once I forgot to say my ATIS when I was ready to taxi, and instead of telling me "let me know if/when you have latest ATIS" (or whatever) he had to tell me "i CaN't GiVe YoU tAxI iNsTruCtIoNs, yOu NeEd tO tElL mE yOuR aTiS"
it was frustrating at times, and I always was really tense, and it wasn't really fun for me (also they opened too late in the afternoon for my time zone), so I cancelled it
@reef isle PE controllers don't act like controllers, they act like examiners, and they treat every flight like a checkride.
And it definitionally can't be fun.
yeah, that's fair 😄
Today’s the 77F release isn’t it
thats why im scared of flying on PE tbh
yes
hey its fslabs
All this talk about flight hours when my longest flight was less than two hours long lol
Anything over about 45 minutes is a no go for me.
Then what do you fly lol
Helis, and small ga mostly. Airliners bore me
Why don't you just fly around in a super hornet
Not my cup of tea
The MSFS super hornet is not very good, to put it mildly
helis based
There’s plenty you can fly, even with airliners, with under 45 minute block time
I’ve never done any GA/helicopter/military flight. All of my flights are airline flights. My shortest one was 18 minutes of flight time
And that wasn’t done in some small turboprop or anything either. It was in a 737
Out of my 82 total flights, 15 are between Sitka and Juneau, which takes 30 minutes to do fully, from starting the engines to shutting them
So yeah, there’s plenty you can do in under 45 minutes
and you can do plenty of military flights longer than 45 minutes 😎 i think i managed about 3-4 hours in the Viper with mid-air refuels in DCS once, before I had to take the VR headset off
I mean, you can fly military for a long time lol. Idk if fighters ever really fly a long time without landing, but you also have tankers and stuff. Those things can reach far
they do
depends on ur mission really
sometimes ur on station just to be there incase
yay, looks like I (hopefully) managed to fix the 732 crashing 
I'll have to do a longer flight to make sure, but I'm fairly confident it's fine now
How have people been finding fs24 😅
I thought that was an aloha airlines livery for a second lol
Seems folk are having vastly differing experiences, some finding it ok, others a nightmare
sounds like you need a good internet connection and a lot of patience for the moment
I will try it in 3-6 months
Will stick with 2020 for my flight sim needs then, thank you
haven't flown the fenix since the sharklets released so that should be fun
In Plane Crash Recreated, a team of highly skilled test pilots use cutting-edge flight simulators, such as X-Plane to figure out what went wrong infamous plane crashes. These simulators allow the test pilots to closely mimic the flying conditions of these crashes and see how the plane would react, as if they were the pilot themselves. This Monda...
Quite well actually Career mode has it's bugs but it's working mostly fine
Almost got already 100 hours
that's amazing
is someone willing to help me program the inibuilds A320 with simbrief
Honestly, no idea how Airbus FMCs work
Is there a way to completely disable the msfs in-game ATC?
I loaded up beyondATC because it started working for some reason, and while clearances and other communication goes fine because I simply don’t contact the in-game ATC, the ATIS gets spoken out both in-game and in BATC which is annoying
Can't you lower in ATC ingame volume or does that interfere with BATC?
It shouldn’t, I just can’t find where it is
Not good
Very buggy
Huh I ended up trying it out today, fenix gsx third party addons like I would in MSFS 20 and it worked basically fine, was a bit heavy on RAM usage but my previous issues with CPU load spikes is gone
my main problem is the controls panel, its awful UX wise
maybe I got lucky or smth
For me it's the really high VRAM usage
Once it exceeds the amount I have my frames dip to the low double or single digits
people voices
in audio settings
Oof thats really frustrating, I just read up on it a bit also. seems they've just labelled it as 'hardware limitation' in their issue tracker too
if your game maxes out even a 12gb vram card thats not exactly great :/
Thanks
Only problem, it says it’ll silence the copilot
Which is not something I want tbh
wdym, what plane are you flying?
Well right now the 738, but I do quite often go for the 727 too, and I am learning the 146
Yeah, that's what's bothering me
I was able to run ultra textures fine on 2020 with 8GB, but I've reduced it to medium and it still exceeds
It'd be a real shame if they don't do anything about it
Under Assistance
Thanks, I’ll have a look
Meanwhile I have finished my first flight with ATC, using BeyondATC. I have to say, I was quite impressed with it and I don’t really have complaints. It couldn’t understand my callsign occasionally so asked me to say it again, but it possibly is because of my pronunciation. Also I got cleared for a visual approach and cleared for the landing while I was at 15000ft, but that is partially on me, because I confirmed the airport in sight when at that altitude I shouldn’t have, and either way I just descended too slowly.
Can I ask you if it's possible to use beyond atc without the need to actually talk
Yes, you can actually
You just have to tab into the app, and when you’re on frequency you will have buttons in the bottom left corner with all the calls you can do
Make sure that u dont use premium voices for the first officer
Cuz thats alot of characters used if u do
Personal opinion atleast
Tbh I didn’t use premium voices at all right now
You get 50000 characters when buying standard, but I don’t wanna use them
I might if I go flying through Europe, because I listened to samples and basic voices for Germany/Poland are barely understandable. But for US, they are good enough in my opinion
they're worth it though
i cant lie
as much as i was against the whole idea
it's not dumb
Tbh I might try it, but I just don’t like having stuff run out lol
US basic voices seem to do enough for me
the 777F is out
i think everyone kind of forgot that existed
thank god i have something else to fly other than the MD-11 for fedex
its fitting too, the 777F is what fedex is replacing the MD-11s with
ship fedex and have your package end up in a deserted island in the pacific
this has to be an inside joke, right?? the PMDG team have done this on two liveries now
i dont believe at all that someone in 2024 does not know that the US flag has 50 stars now
I may not be noticing something, but what’s wrong? 5 lines of 10 stars makes it 50 stars in total
Ooh lovely weather ain’t it
50 stars, but in the wrong pattern
They have it in straight lines, like the 48 star flag
Ah, fair
Tbh, I can’t even really suggest why could it be. It could even be as simple as them thinking “eh whatever nobody’s gonna notice”
Another flight with BATC. “Cleared for visual approach runway 11” was lovely to hear
EasyJem
Who needs EasyJet when you have EasyJem
factually true statement
Good spawn
@shadow burrow r u in LEJ anytime jan?
Not sure yet
what
in my hundreds of hours of flight sim, i have never dared to fly into JFK, newark, or laguardia
only once, to do the sully flight
ive considered doing a jetblue A321 flight from new york to puerto rico or something with my new PC though
Flown into KLGA and KJFK, haven't touched Newark yet.
Why? What's special about them?
I mean, I guess LGA it's quite interesting in the sense that it has short runways and that visual which can be difficult, but it's just one of the approaches for RWY13 (IIRC)
But if you're not on VATSIM and don't have to worry about the complicated airspace around there I don't think there's much difference between them and any other airport?
I feel like I'm missing something that should be quite obvious
There’s really nothing special about those 3
Granted I mainly fly out of LGA/JFK because if flying in, I would probably get serious stutters which could ruin the approach (I mean… both airports take a couple minute to appear after loading into them, need I say more? Folks have done a great job creating those, not an awesome job optimising those)
But really, as for landings, you’ll mostly just get vectors and then visual/ILS
Of course if you fly without ATC you’d have to vector yourself, but then again, it’s the same for any other major airport in the US pretty much
I’ve done takeoffs from all 3, I’ve done landings in all 3, really nothing too scary in them. In MSFS navigating on the ground is painful at JFK and EWR if you don’t have good sceneries, and if you do have good sceneries, performance can be bad, but that’s about it
I get that it can (or dare I say, should) be a bit scary if you fly on VATSIM, a friend of mine is an approach controller there and the airspace structure is very complicated and unintuitive, there are 3 busy airports in a tiny footprint. You not turning on the SID, or getting vectors wrong is most likely going to cause a big issue for someone else, and some annoyed controllers.
But if you're not on VATSIM then all of that is no factor pretty much
And IIRC ngc doesn't fly on VATSIM
Also there's no way you'd know enough to vector yourself correctly unless you just get lucky or replicate a real flight path.
announcing downwind, base, final, etc. on CTAF/Unicom is sorta vectoring yourself ¯_(ツ)_/¯
extremely laggy
In 2020 or 2024?
High altitude sunrises are the best thing ever.
Rise n set in general ;p
No, I specifically like above FL370, like where you start to see the curvature of the earth, And that contrast where the sky starts to light up, but the ground is still fully dark... Just pure magic.
Now try it when the SR71 gets released 🤣
The VSKYLABS 'Test-Pilot': SR-71-TB (Testbed) Project.JetManHuss - VSKYLABS (c) 2024 All Rights Reserved High definition SR-71 Flight simulation for X-Plane 12 Flight Simulator.EARLY ACCESS VERSIONThe products is available only for X-PLANE 12MINIMUM HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS FOR X-PLANE 12 Dis
That's for XP12 😉
Exactly.
They suggested me to try it "when it gets released." The only worthy SR-71 that I can use has been out for a while.
Ah, I for some reason had it in my head that we were talking MSFS - probably getting my wires crossed, ignore me 🙂
No, it's just MSFS is now sort of a "default sim," everyone assumes that a counterparty uses it.
Which is very unfair.
I think it's actually because I saw ngc and Morsey Froose talking about it above and assumed it was the same conversation
I definitely don't consider MSFS the default sim for military aircraft 🙂
My assumption came from me only owning MSFS and only knowing of Bluebird's Blackbird, my bad 🫡
Oh definitely, I expect Vatsim there gets properly chaotic, and I expect controllers there can get quite angry at times. But if you know what you’re doing, it shouldn’t really be problematic
As for performance, well it can be quite poor when you have custom sceneries
Vatsim NY controllers have been great in my experience
(That said I generally avoid ny to avoid idiot longhaul pilots)
You can only watch a BAW 744 park at a domestic gate so many times before you get tired of it
lingus
Whilst it'll be PMDG i'm excited to get to fly a 744 in a sim, never got the chance as I never used p3d and we had nothing for xp11 
some small neat details with the ini 330, the more you fly with it the most 'wear and tear' it gets
Hey, some of us just genuinely have no idea
That’s pretty much the reason I’m not on vatsim lol
Don’t wanna be a nuisance like that, considering when I fly by myself I just select a gate at random with no reference (Unless I’m in Sheremetyevo)
this is what i do
well minus obv if im flying cargo or not
If I have the option to see where the flight I did parked on flightradar24 i'll follow it but otherwise yeah I just choose randomly
I'm not gonna park a heavy in a 737/320 spot tho
Well yeah it’s more or less easy to see if your plane can actually fit in the stand
Plus to be fair I often fly in spots where there’s literally no choice, you have 2 stands and the only difference between them is jetway vs no jetway
Tbh I do even with cargo, just choosing a cargo spot at random
I once parked at an iab US customs stand because it was the only place that had a heavy stand 
I think I once parked a 777 in a narrowbody stand, one where my wingtips were basically in the other stands
In my defence, default Sochi was a horrible place and I’m very glad I no longer have to suffer because I bought payware scenery for it
Btw Jem since you fly msfs24, how do default airports there compare?
any specifics you want me to check out?
I just flew into default amsterdam cause my dumbass was supposed to fly to brussels and that had accurate ground markings💀
Just overall looks at least
Up-to-date accuracy too I guess, cause I know several of the default airports in MSFS20 are wrong on that. Sheremetyevo is missing a terminal. Istanbul International doesn’t exist at all.
Istanbul is a shout, i'll check some and grab some pics 
so LTFM isn't even there still. UUEE has no proper ground markings. KSEA, CSZT, PANC, PAJN, KSFO, KLAX
with default you get a lot of the world update/upgraded airports for free
all yellow stars are the upgraded airports
lots more if you zoom in but those are major ones
if theres any in particular you wanna see lmk, not much of a departure from the old models. you can also use most of your custom third party stuff if you paste from 2020 to 2024
Stewart looked stunning
Well, tbh UUEE does look bit better in terms of terminals, but even the fs20 default had some markings… also, judging by the map, terminal C is not added either - can’t spawn there
LTFM still not being there is a shame
Not only a shame, but also awful really
Yeah its really bad, luckily theres a freeware and hopefully it gets updated/works fine
In 2020 I more or less understand. It was quite new, there really could’ve just not been enough data to autogenerate it as the others
But by now there surely has to be enough information. And genuinely, I think Istanbul deserves to be hand-crafted really. It’s among the most used airports iirc after all
As for the other ones you’ve shown, they actually look rather nice
a lot of them are flyable, maybe i'll fly more variety once fs2024 is running better 
i'll say this then go do another 10 easyJet rotations 
Agree, its a pretty big airport in terms of connecting various places 
its an easy way to do quick greece hops to
And to the Balkans too
A wonderful place to start from if you want a quick trip to Tivat
Except I’m having to start at Ataturk because no LTFM anywhere
You probably mean easyJem
Well, some runways are just not in use lol
but why choose the runway with 11kts of crosswind, when theres an option with 5kts and a stronger headwind
Possibly noise restrictions or there is a better approach available on 10
There's a deer on the runway
you cant land on a floating garbage patch 
sorry, "floating island of garbage"
jk i love you puerto rico
🇵🇷

the routing on KBOS-TJSJ is really goofy, i would think that it would follow the coastline, but it goes to bermuda and then down
Indeed pretty goofy 💀
Why follow the busy airspace over the coastline if you can go into the less occupied areas over the ocean without much loss
Generally better to avoid overflying water if you can overfly land
Unless you're in a floatplane I guess
that was my thinking too
though i guess it kind of works, consdiering bermuda is right on the route, and so is the southern tip of florida, so if you had any emergencies your not far
I mean, etops is a thing after all and it never really goes that far into the ocean away from the alternatives to become a genuine hazard
the glideslope is indeed completely fucked into TJSJ, its extremely high, coupled with extremely gusty tropical winds
smooth, but late
I see FS24's KORD is still borked as its a Asobo Custom port from FS20 😂
Angry ATC: "vacate when able, not stop on the rwy" 😂
That’s one thing I suck at, I always forget to disarm auto brake after landing, so that always puts me in a full stop landing
push the brakes at 60 kts
manual brake
does that disable autobrake? ive never actually tried it, because ive heard you can blow up tires that way
Whenever you push brakes manually, the autobrake is turned off
why?
jetblue flies this route several times a day in A321s, yet simbrief says i cant do it?
Don't they use perhaps a different type of A321?
nope, A321-200s, occasionally a neo
working now, i have no idea what i did differently though
im actually burning EVEN MORE fuel in that plan, and my empty weight is even higher, and it says i can make it that time
Cost Index + Block fuel maybe?
yes, u shouldnt do it above 60 kts though
Just SimBrief being stupid.
I've had it with the Challenger, it calculated very poorly for a 7 hour flight, I calculated in ForeFlight and then plugged into SimBrief - and it accepted it.
would have been nice if it wasn't so unstable
when it does work it loads faster, performs and looks better than 2020
This is 20, I know it can work in 24 with copy paste but I don't trust it with vram stuff rn
Fair
Yakkity yak
Why does SimBrief give a flight from Iqaluit to Ottawa as an ETOPS flight
Is Canada really that much of northing
Is Canada really that much of northing
It’s not even much of Nunavut or whatnot, it’s me mainly flying over Newfoundland and Quebec
I think ETOPS isn't actually water/land
it's how many minutes away from a suitable diversion airport
so looks like SimBrief didn't find any
Eh, it depends, there might be something and it could be that SimBrief doesn't think it's appropriate, it could be that there is bad weather, etc...
Fair
Iqaluit
This is why I think //42 stuff is absolutely worth it. And yes, I did start up at the stand. I think it’s not forbidden there, plus it’s mostly because the pushback died
Plus the 737 immersion pack too
I will probably regret not getting the 777 on sale
But at least I got some airports instead
Now the question is… how the f do I work with ATC
I wanna request takeoff cause I’m lined up and ready
But the airport has no tower or anything
how much FPS does it eat up?
ive heard that it can be really bad, so ive never even looked into it, even though it looks extremely impressive
though i do love their wheel menu, i cant imagine playing MSFS without it anymore
I’ve not noticed any performance change at all
ive never actually tried flying the LVFR stuff without the horizon mod, and im too scared to actually try it 
and its unfortunately still the only A321neo (in MSFS2020)
i really have no interest in sitting in the fenix for 3 hours too, atleast with the lvfr you can get some high simrates
in other news, DCS have launched the Iraq map into early access, after having delivered precisely 0 patches for the 6-month-old Afghanistan map, also in early access
if you buy Iraq you're just asking to be ripped off, imo
So… I just requested and was given FL420…
I forgot that the service ceiling of the 737 is FL410…
And I’m not empty, and I have anti-ice on
im on a jetblue kick for some reason
i ended up going with the fenix, and doing JFK-LAX rather than from BOS
the jetblue livery with the A321 is just 
Going back to me wondering about ETOPS… Turns out Canada is more huge than I expected and there indeed seems to be nothing
yeah, the only real big airports crossing are calgary/edmonton and winnipeg
your only other option is municipal airports, if you want to try and land a 737 on those 
jesus christ
like a 70kt crosswind in cruise, im flying at a 45 degree angle
now at 160kts
Eh, a 737 in municipals is not the worst you could have
But I’m not even in western Canada
I’m over Quebec
SimBrief said there’s literally not a single 737-suitable airport between Iqaluit and Quebec City, and now I believe it
And the winds here… come on, 120 headwind? Can I get that but in tail?
ngc does worst landing ever, asked to leave microsoft flight sim
i hear it yell glideslope and that scares the shit out of me, but if i just followed that trajectory i wouldnt have been late
I mean it worked
I haven't played msfs in quite a while due busy
do i dare try the A380 with my new PC
8k textures, i should be able to crush it, but it scares me still
performs worse than the fenix by a good margin
the international accents are MUCH better now, aer lingus uses an irish accent, air india uses an indian accent, it all works very nicely
its almost too realistic actually, im going to be sitting at the gate for a while waiting for traffic to clear the taxiway just to get started with the push 
having the traffic on 7 seems to strike a good balance between performance, realism, and a busy airport
traffic on 8 was WAY too intense, it was constant radio calls, so bad that i could barely get anything in
probably not unrealistic for heathrow, but usually even the busiest airports have radio calls that are pretty steady but spaced
holy shit...
welcome back aerosoft A330
i get that it's free, i get that it's open source and non-profit, but come on now...
(the only hand-flown portion of this departure was the first turn out)
wtf, a flock of birds targeted my plane and shit all over it
this looks horrible
i never thought that i would actually prefer flying the fenix over the FBW
About to do a group flight with a friend of mine, Boston to Heathrow
And after a bunch of delays (ground ops, plus waiting for me friend because I told him the wrong departure time so he wasn’t ready) I’m away from Boston
Soon it’s going to be time to turn on the logo light
The 300 actually looks quite nice
Might get it relatively soon
deboarding went well 
They usually have it for a good price during sales so look out 
its pretty good, i got it but havent used it as much as id like to
its just weird as a cargo aircraft, small and old, but still a lot of them around
I'd rather wait for the A300B4 tbh
True
the A300 avionics are very similar to the A310 (which is free)
A300-600 is the inferior A300 tbh
yeah it's really boring
No FE panel, glass cockpit…
I mean, it's interesting in a way, since it was the first airbus two man cockpit
but yeah, I'd much rather have the B4
a lot more interesting airlines operated it and it's going to be something completely different from what we're used to
Also I suspect the FM is going to be better
I just don't see the point in paying full airliner price for a slightly better A310 with more bells and whistles (I'll never use no doubt)
If the idea of flying cargo is that important to you, fine, but I'd rather spend my money elsewhere
(also no A310 cargo, sad)
It’s a shame we’ll probably never get the cargo 310
Does anyone know how to see which ATC frequency zone I’m in? I shut BATC for a bit in flight and now I have no idea which freq to call
Ah yes, indeed
Is that my favourite Airbus the A300
you have mental issues if the A300 is your favorite
Why are you pointing out the obvious
off to Gatwick
got nostalgic for the family trips we did to disneyworld every year, we always took southwest back when they still used canyon blue
horrible livery, but so nostalgic
I quite prefer Canyon to the now ngl
https://inibuilds.com/products/inibuilds-a300-600r-airliner-msfs-2024 There's now a Premium Edition of the A300 for MSFS2024 available
A Return to Excellence: The iniBuilds A300-600R Airliner for MSFS 2024 - Premium Edition Building on the success of our iconic A300 in MSFS2020, we are proud to bring the iniBuilds A300-600R Airliner to Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024. This legendary aircraft has been redefined for the latest generation of flight sim t
And the free update v1.1.3 released for it too
Next group flight with me friend, this leg is London to Dubai. Planning to do Dubai to Moscow with Aeroflot next
Folks, does anyone know which routes did Boeing deliver 727s to ANA/JAL over? I wanna do something quite crazy like flying over an ocean with that thingy, and delivering a 727 over the Pacific fits the task quite well. The question just remains, did they do it from Alaska directly to Japan or as island hops through Hawaii. Either option would be really pushing the limits of the 72 tbh
ugh, I can look it up
I found some crazy delivery routes for the F28
If you’d be so kind
no promises
Cause I really don’t even know where to look
Simple google is unfortunately not much of an answer in this case
How crazy are we talking?
unfortunately I've only found the Ansett ones (from the same website that had the Fokker ones)
history of ansett australia boeing 727-277lr vh-anb cn 22642-1759.
maybe with some deep digging I can find something, but it's not readily avaiable
Ansett will absolutely do too, I planned to deliver one to Australia too lol
history of ansett airlines boeing 727-277a vh-rmk cn 21178-1237.
yeah just look around this website 😄
Only we don’t have the Ansett livery for the 727 yet I think, but idk when I’m gonna do it, so maybe by that point we’ll already have the passenger version, which I am sure will have more liveries made by the community
Thank you, I’ll take a look
And the flight is done
Swiss Jem
Swiss international jem lines
At this rate we're gonna make every airline about Jem lol
Who is jem
^^
Ohh
Well, every one that Jem flies, yes
lemme just fly every airline rq
😭 😭 😭
RyanJem
Jemthansa
I’d say LuftJemsa instead
And technically that already applies since iirc Swiss is owned by them
Yeah that works better
Oh wait yeah I do remember seeing that somewhat when searching up the full name of swiss
I didn't realise swiss was owned by lufthansa until a cabin announcement pack on the fenix lol
I know lufthansa teknic (or similar) is huge but they / star alliance own a lot
That's the most random way to find that out lol
Jemirates is the best I could think of
That works so well actually
Jemoflot?
That sound wrong
American Air Jem
Pacific South Jem
Jemsucre (Jem might not like that)
Jemflot
Jemhay Pacific
JANTAS (Jem and Northern Territories Aerial Service)
Air New Jem
Etijem
Aer Jemgus
Jemited Airlines
Jemta Airlines
JAJ (Japan Air Jem)
AJA (All Jem Airways)
Air Jemryo
I'd instead say American jem lines, jem lingus and JJA (Japan Jem lines)
Jem blue
JAS (Jem Airline System)
Jemwegian Air Shuttle
Jemeria
Jem Blue and AerJemGus are great lol
What about All Jem Airways 😭
How do we fit Jem into SAS?
JAS
Jem blue is from air blue which is a Romanian airline
Scandinavian Jemlines is kinda basic
That is the name of the Swedish fighter jet lol JAS 39 Gripen
Lol
Jem airlines system?
Plus they are actually Scandinavian Airline Systems
That’s why I proposed JAS
Jem Airline System
Took my line 
How do we fit jem into lot polish airlines
~~Jemish Airlines ~~
What would royal air maroc be but jem?
I’m actually unsure…
Naaaaahhhhhh
Jembe
Royal Air Jem?
Jemiopian Airlines
Especially cuz lot means flight in polish
Wait actually Royal Jem Maroc sounds more harmonious
S7 turns into J7
AirArabia -> JemArabia
Jemberian airlines now?
I guess xD
Jemwings
Have we done Iberia?
Jemora
Ajem Airlines
Ujem Airlines?
Utjem?
Latam?
Yeah, I say Jemeria
Ah
Now we gotta fit Jem into Earth or it's other name
easyJem
Asia? Nah, Jem
A classic
Now someone gotta start randomly making Jem liveries for MSFS, literally just changing the names of airlines to the list we have here now 
Don't forget Jembraer
Wait that sounds wrong...
de Jemiland (can’t forget the ones who started the jetliner age after all?)
What about the Russian manufacturers
I think it's best if we don't bring em up for now
Jempolev Design Bureau
Also how do we fit Jem into Antonov?
Jemtonov
What about Jem into SAAB
JAAB
What more is there on the list now hmmmmm
Oh there’s plenty really
At least if you go back in time
Used to be so many manufacturers
Let's do train operators sometime too
Jemver and Rio Grande Western
Jemlford
Jem Baltic when? 
Jemited Airlines to O'Jem Jemcago
The only thing I dont like about 24 is the preflight checks.... wtf do they have you (as the pilot) remove chocks on a commerical airliner? 😂 thats ground crew job
Yeah
@shadow burrow do u fly bizjets in xp at all
u seen the new cj525
Discover the precision and realism of the Take Command! CitationJet 525 by TorqueSim, a new benchmark in medium-size business jet simulation for X-Plane 12. With several years of development, it offers study-level systems, unmatched flight dynamics, and multiple avionics configurations, including GTN bezels ready for use with third party add-ons...
That looks good
I’m stuck in Belfast for a month so I can’t even play fs
r u doing RYR HQ shenanigans
Yes
oh
Temp transfer to Belfast because Ryanair UK have 60% fleet availability over the Christmas period
All of there planes are fucked
i thought RYR had excellent maintenance
We do
It’s just that this summer barely any aircraft have had the possibility of getting heavy maintenance done
The utilisation was through the roof
And all the RUK aircraft are old as balls
Germany
terrible taxes
hate it
though i must say
i usually get FRA/MUC-HND return for 400-500ish
either im spoiled or just lucky
If I’m seeing family in Heidelberg then I fly to Luxembourg now to avoid the tax and just take the train for like 15 quid
Or Basel
Yeah
it makes 0 sense to me
Idk why
oh nvm that's fine tbh
All of our internal memos are just shit talking the German authorities
very understandable, every frequent traveller here is too
whats a good avg to pay for ryr for 1 route
Depends on the route
You can get stuff like Copenhagen return for about 30 ish
20 return?
holy cheap
goddamn
Nahhhhh
I have done 4.30h on a jumpseat while not working on a max 8200
Staff travel is a bitch sometimes
The jumpseat opposite the right toilet as well
So every 2 min you have to stand up
Those flight times are mostly ok
Also Pegasus back from Kazakhstan was dreadful
6h on a domestic config A320
Not fun
Pegasus
Im sorry for you
do you lads know any program to make your own sort of company
wtih a not so clunky interface
Pretty
It's gonna be pricey but realistic as hell
I’m gonna assume they are doing the same pricing structure as the 767
You pay for “upgrade packages”
Discounted if you already own the 777
I mean idc, atm it’s arguably the most realistic 777 available for flight sim and it’s still in beta
I’m willing to pay for that
Same as the p3d PMDG stuff that’s aged like milk these days 😂😂
willing to pay for that
the 777 is so fucking good
They are also a little bit behind schedule with the full release
They said by Christmas
I don’t think that’s gonna happen
But it’s FF so I know it’s gonna be done
me: "Dear, Bluebird..." 😂
Dont forget their 787
I wonder when we‘ll see that
Happy about their 777 though
I need my flyjsim 732 w fms now
Learning the A340. I think I'm in love.
What... happened there?
No idea it's bugged the mission
Guys the game isn't broken I swear
Toliiss or X Works?
Wtf is X Works?
ToLiSS of course.
X-Works A340 mod For Laminar A330 1.0.1
I don't think I wanna know.
732 with fms 🥲
To be honest I can absolutely understand it if you want to fly realistic current day operations
I mean, would be cool to be honest
I’d prefer the 732 in original condition, the ones retrofitted with glass cockpits (nolinor ones are) don’t look too right. Although tbf, it doesn’t look awful either
It‘s not bad apparently
That reason
Vastly superior clouds (and performance) to X-Plane
I wouldn't call them vastly superior, but I don't like any volumetric clouds in modern simulators.
The only ones I genuinely liked were Enhanced Skyscapes for XP11. XP12 ones are better in terms of light dispersion and variety but worse in terms of microstructure.
MSFS ones are okay from the side, but flying through them, they completely fall flat. No microstructure at all, neither variety.
MSFS clouds tho do visually simulate convective effects, which is a better part of them.
I'll put it this way: side-lit (reflection), MSFS clouds look a bit more realistic, but through-lit (dispersion), X-Plane 12 look more realistic.
Partially because there's no lens flare, god rays, and all the other completely unrelistic garbage that doesn't belong in a simulator.
Also, X-Plane 12 simulates lit up mist when the sun is low, reducing ground visibility significantly.
I often flew IRL during sunrise/sunset, and that effect is something you gotta get used to and learn to be ready for. MSFS lacks in entirely.
God rays aren't unrealistic lol
They are definitely visible in real life in the right conditions
Lens flare I'll give you though, no idea why every game these days treats the player as a walking camera
Thankfully you can at least disable it
I hate that effect
Why would anyone really want it
Or more so, why would anyone want it on by default
Cause it has its use - if you want to film some cinematic, in right conditions it will be useful
But that’s literally only gonna apply to 0.0001% of players and only once in their whole playtime pretty much
whats the new nav system?
it's the GTN750 im using atm
Ah
The new one is GNS?
I honestly am not sure if that’s the name
I don’t fly with anything but INS lol
icba to fly w the INS tbh
