#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
funny how they do all sorts of documents for the 5 people that are gonna read it
& the trillion others that are too retarded to understand & jump on the network anyway
IVAO were assholes to me, so I responded in kind tenfold and proud of it.
Of course I'll never be let on anymore, but it's like being banned from McDonald's when you can afford an upscale place next to it.
It's not funny, it's tragic.
At least I know that in my community people read documentation, and use it. So it's about picking your crowd.
I might just join Vatsim tomorrow, just to see everything going to shit
I will either way tbh, I never said anything about flying the A380
I've been on the network long enough to know how to act
Okay. We need more sane people on the network.
So if you're up for actually reading stuff, you're more than welcome.
Wait, by "join" you mean "login"?
I interpreted it as "register."
oh nah nah, just login
like I said, I've been on Vatsim for long enough to know what to do/what not to do
took me god knows how long to be comfortable enough flying the Concorde to fly that bad boy on Vatsim
the IAD controllers were very pleased with my performance
Fair enough.
I’m going to do my first ever VATSIM flight specifically for the A380
vatsim is not hard if you arent an idiot and u can read
just log in as an obeserver a few times and listen along
i havent had issues with vnav
but
freeware
alpha
theres a difference in it being $80 and free
so cant be harsh
Speaking of no GLS, one thing I actually love about MD-11 is that it can't do RNP, not the version by Rotate at least.
I mean, it's technically selectable, but you can't even check ANP, so it's not authorized.
No vnav on a modern tube is pretty killer
But it's a freeware that will be updated over time which is fair enough
false
@shadow burrow what u talm about
GLS is a bummer but i cannot remember ever flying one
Vnav available. Yet can only prec app in fpa? Okay 🫠
(i know the front is supposed to be airstairs, i dont know how to get it to work with GSX)
Oh I ain’t played it read it wasn’t functional?
GLS is cool
It’s a shame I’m working today would love to sit in observer mode at EGLL with some Pringles and watch the chaos unfold
FPA is not vertical guidance, wtf?
My respect for those people was at neutral zero, now it kinda leaned into the negative.
Before A380 was a curse of the developer community, now it's a curse of eberyone.
im just kind of happy that my hypothesis that this release was going to be an utter mess was validated
fixed, for some reason when auto-importing a flight plan, it uses the wrong cruise altitude, most likely it auto-inputs the calculated best cruise and not the planned
starting to descend from an altitude under cruise, the plane freaks out and is like "dont you want to climb to cruise actually before you start descent?"
it only just occured to me, that its meant to mirror the actual built-in EFB in the dreamliner
a screenshot from xplane, but you get the idea
I mean you have IRL ones like this tho
The built in ones from the 777 and 787 aren’t really “efb’s”
They don’t usually connect to the pilots network to grab perf data
Pilots will still have an iPad as there own personal Crew Device
Extract air stairs and then call the stairs
Oh great our plane is fucked
lmfao
oh don't worry
u have a few days
rip vatsim a380 is out
Just divert to Luton, ain’t nobody wanna go there 
hell yea
where liveries : (
aw hell nah
emirates is out
Nahh
I fly planes in BeamNG. can I post my stuff here or should I move to the BeamNG channel?

my lord the A380 is huge
Im considering diverting
I’d quite like to try it out once I can but my laptop probably won’t handle it lol
Yes
was talking in gb but still
You could pretty much feed the 737 through an A380 engine nacelle
Hope it's a quick and easy process for FBW to get it running in FS24
I don't wanna get my simpit back out of storage until then
what plane?
Tbf it looks like that but it doesn’t entirely fit
The 737 fuselage is iirc around 3 3/4m in diameter, and both variants of the fans on the 388 are just short of 3m in diameter
either i forgot to turn hyd on or they're broken
I chose a bad airport for this
can yall not fly into gatwick 🙏
im actually consdering diverting
pretty
theres a new a320neo update too guys 
yeah I got it
you're forgetting that planes arrive it seems
well atm theres none due to arrive
well fuck sake
LMAO
AJAHAHA
holy fuck
yeahhhhhhh gonna be logging off vatsim before gatwick
100%
acc gonna do it now atp
if on vatsim just alt+f4
on the A380
huh
omfg ur acc so unable to use your eyes?!
@hollow oracle explain wht im saying please
xd
bro I opened the pilot window on the A380 and I don't know how to close it
I'm not talking about vatsim
?
ah yes, the famous american A380s, and their route between denver and minneapolis
💀
💀
didn't know Emirated did domestic US flights
what about heathrow?
not as bad as dubai
actually, here's europe sorted by just A380, both volanta and VATSIM traffic

why are there A380's in bucharest
no idea
they're too fat for the airport there
you can program the MCDU?
*bing-bong* hey the FBW A380 just released yall mind if i max this max 8 so i can switch to that
I'm so dumb I can't program the MCDU 👍


huh
finally
A380
actually, heres something really funny, this is what it actually looks like irl
weather
55 mins to landing into LGW
lmao
goddamn
I managed to do the flight from LCPH To EGKK in under 4 hours
RIGHT Time to go do a barrel roll in a 380
BRUH
SIMBREIF IS DOWN
LMFAO
xd
Ok
how do I know the cruise wind?
and what do I put in CO RTE
can someone help me program this damn FMC 😭
not nearly as bad, but still pretty bad
im waiting for a flying honu livery
i tried my hand at the paint kit but its pretty bad
its basically the external shell of the model, and a single 8k white square
yes, but theres really no like, what texture goes where
i guess i could group all of the models by material, but still
why the hell can't I steer on the ground
Man ran out of engines
bru
sully moment
Happens in real life
actually?
Yeah
Royal Australian Air Force (A41-212) Boeing C-17A Globemaster III departing RW03 at Perth Airport on July 17, 2023.
This aircraft was completed in August 2015 and was delivered to the RAAF on September 4, 2015.
A41-212 was the last C-17A delivered to the RAAF and is operated by 36 Squadron at RAAF Amberley in Queensland.
#sivideoaviation #royala...
I think the RCAF once landed one at Heathrow
They can land in 2/3rds of the runway length that an A320 needs so it's not too bad at it
how do I turn off the little waypoints?
nevermind
hey hey
hope I don't end up in the Everglades
it's so choppy bruh
oh lord
Did the a380 release today
no
well I died
we're all flying the bredok 380
taking off and landing exclusively from aircraft carriers
i was going to lose my A380 virginity with the ANA flight, but i think im going to do emmy rats to get it started i guess
its hard to judge if liveries are actually good or rushed by just the thumbnails too, but that emirates old livery one is pretty damn good
hues by horizon just uploaded a few liveries too, so those are instant downloads
pitch trim 1 and 2 fault but they aren't turning on
bruh why is a C17 parking at my gate
i think the a380 is easily the worst performing thing ive ever seen for this sim
currently averaging less than 1 FPS
gamer keyboard
r u running 4 or 8k
because 4k runs smooth as hell for me
i'd argue the fenix runs worse
A380 🤷♂️
B-1B 👍
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7UjXKThjDA
Introducing the KwikFlight Bone - B1 Jet for Microsoft Flight Simulator. Out Now!
https://inibuilds.com/products/kwikflight-bone-msfs
Learn more: https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/23970-kwikflight-bone-for-microsoft-flight-simulator-released/
*Disclaimer: This trailer does not represent the final product.
Join our Discord: https://inib.uk/di...
truly the golden age of flight simming
ayo it looks good as hel
I guess Dyess AFB is going to be busy on Volanta for a few days
why modern cockpit 
all my interested in this plane wanished in a second
I was about to write, if the flight model is decent it seems like fun
then I got to 1:03 on the trailer, and I was just like. Ugh
i will agree that this was cooler
on approach
I fucking hate this awful trend of only making retroffit planes
P180, OBVIOUSLY flightFX is only doing the II and the Evo
tbf the B-1B has had a glass cockpit for over a decade now
so it's not new new
but yeah, desert storm era would have been nice
In terms of aircraft "over a decade" is quite new
EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
who wants that
If I see an avionic package that is not a G1000 or G3000 (or equivalment) I'm going to vomit
-every flight sim developer apart from JF and Blacksquare
Even blackbird wanted to do the 737-200 with the full glass cockpit Nolinor retrofit
WTF
Why
what's the point
i can forgive blackbird
they are doing the blackbird after all
can't glass cockpit that 
It appears I won’t be flying the A380 tonight
It’s so bad performing that it completely disables my PC, as well as being extremely laggy
i took a nap, just got back, and it looks like it finally is running at 10-15FPS
my PC is bad, but its playable with the fenix, this is unplayable
sorry for the ping, im dumb
keyboard is under tray table
i will be making an RGB gamer keyboard mod
i lost where you click on the tray table to fold it down
ah, i broke the tray table animation, thats why its not working
Did you install the 4k or 8k FBW A380
4k
aaaand my game just crashed
no, it didnt, its so laggy that it keeps going on the verge of death but then it revives for a single frame
i dont think my game is performing fast enough to fly this
it needs atleast 17fps and im easily getting 5 and under
4k
i just want to preface it by saying: i know its freeware, open source, and in an inital alpha release but, if your looking for an A380 to fly, its not the right aircraft for that, im very much not satisfied with the performance
they really have everybody by the balls when it comes to the A380, because you cant complain about a product thats intentionally being worked on and free, but im going to say it, it just doesnt really fill the A380 void quite yet
it can be free and alpha, and also be not satisfiying, both can be true
though, i will say that my performance has very gradually gotten better as this flight has gone on, most likely from things getting slowly worked on in the background, and as i use systems and sounds and things, those are getting loaded in too
Any medium-ish haul flight I can do in the A380?
define medium
to name a few
One of those weird gaps tbh, anything less than 5h30m is 3hr flights
wtf are vatsim doing? Like actually?
I’ve seen zero bans handed out so far and I’ve found just this morning looking on my phone 10-15 aircraft running A388’s into or out of airports they cannot handle?
I think it may be time to re subscribe to pilotedge…..
You can say whatever you want, remind people of the rules but if you don’t actually enforce them then what’s the point
Fair, did you see Orlando for Cross The Pond? 77W at gates that can't handle them irl
CTP is always like this
When you specifically say your gonna enforce these rules
Then don’t
What’s the point of having the rules to begin with
Tbh gates that can’t handle them isn’t that big of a deal imo. I constantly fly into airports I don’t know and I often have no idea where you would realistically park a specific plane. It’s a different story when you’re trying to fly an approach normally and a dozen 380s decide to attack the airport
^^
messed up something lol
@hollow oracle
https://flightsim.to/file/83879/all-nippon-airways-ana-green-turtle-ja382a-flybywire-airbus-a380x-8k
✓ All Nippon Airways (ANA) 'Green Turtle / Flying Honu' JA382A | FlyByWire Airbus A380X [8K] is a Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 mod created by KiwiFlightSim. This add-on features a detailed livery for the FlyByWire Airbus A380X, representing All Nippon Airways (ANA) Green Turtle JA382A in stunning 8K resolution. It includes high-quality graphi...
@hollow oracle here
A380X Performance Guide: DDS Texture Conversion Tutorial A guide by RW Profiles and FS Reviews. Follow us both to stay updated with more guides! Join RW Profiles for high-quality sceneries and GSX profiles Join FS Reviews for data-driven flight sim tutorials and reviews. This guide shows you how...
take this as well
PC died trying to do this lol
Tried converting the 8K textures, blew up my RAM and killed my PC instantly
No blue screen, it just stops responding and the monitors time out because they’re getting no signal from the GPU anymore
There is a 4k version on the flybywire installer no need to convert
I have the 4k version installed
Oh ok
the 4k version still has 8k textures for some reason
doing the 8k texture conversion in small chunks worked
this helped MASSIVELY
hoping they actually work that into the official release soon
still on the laggier side, comparing to the PMDG 777 atleast, but its way better now
well, either that helped, or just the fact that its the second time ive run it and its loaded in even further
🥲
see if it wasn't for the fact I had work tomorrow, i'd set up a long haul
ideally a continuation of the Heathrow-Dubai-Sydney shit I did last night, ended up landing in haram country this morning
A380 this.... Superjumbo that....
Where my 744 fans at?
please don't make me reinstall P3D
One thing I'm well chuffed we have in XP
I genuinely considered it a few days ago
don't 
everything you see in this screenshot bar the sim is freeware
easier than P3D
true, but still
and you wont brick it by installing a livery
its tempting, but i'll have to hold out till PMDG releases theirs
would be the only aircraft i'd actually install the sim for anyway
same with P3D & the Concorde.. only just the basic shit to fly it & nothing more
very functional but very buggy
also done in the old P3D way of ground services in the 3rd FMC 😭
why was this a thing btw?
oh yea that was some bullshit, always forgot the chocks annoyingly
atleast with the Concorde, everything seemed to work alright
only shit thing is GSX, but eh nothing surprises me anymore
I finally got a rug to put my rudder pedals down again
Finally I won't have to use the rudder axis on the flight stick
gambling time
im really getting my money's worth with the max 8, like i did with the MD-11, 6 flight hours in 5 days
They changed my shift
I am now going to Morocco again
why did I have to ignite my engines twice
why does my simbrief not work 😭
I hate that is takes 5 years for the instruments to align
Might re download MSFS just for the a380
True
everyones' expecting msfs2024 to work with everything instantly
just use 2020 for a while
on-route to egkk
i like btv
@hollow oracle https://flightsim.to/file/83938/flybywire-a380x-downscaled-cockpit-textures-fps-stutter-improvement
✓ FlyByWire A380X Downscaled Cockpit Textures - FPS/stutter Improvement is a Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 mod created by hurfifi. This add-on offers downscaled cockpit textures for the FlyByWire A380X, specifically designed to improve frame rates and reduce stuttering during flight simulation. The textures have been significantly reduced in ...
This is a stupid ass question, but should 1TB be enough to install MSFS + addons?
I have an external drive that should be quicker than my current one, that should fit MSFS
My current one goes at a snails pace, like 10mb/s, barely manages to update steam games it’s so slow
I mean, depends on how much stuff you will eventually install, but should be enough if you don’t go all crazy installing every single aircraft and scenery
I was going to say, I think my main MSFS install folder on my PC is almost 1TB 
if you have trouble finding routes, i recommend installing flightsimdispatch, you can find weekly schedules for any aircraft and any time period all for free
Pretty much the same with SimBitWorld's random flight generator
Somehow the level of ignorance, delusion, and hate beats Twitter.
Oh, Thranda made some of my favorite products.
Third party devs don't exist now I see
Hm?
Not sure what are you saying.
Nevermind
is that FSX?
Xplane 11
My FSX is completely stock in terms of visuals, so you'd definitely recognise it 😄
X-plane 11 looks so bad now because of X-plane 12
Nah this is just stock XP11 
Ye
Default
Or at least I didn't do anything for that to be there
Uhhhhhh
Hmmmmm
Interesting
If you want to fly on vatsim I would recommend X-CSL
Yeah, I was surprised I could actually see people as A380s (and the livery was correct too)
Nah, don't care, if I need to follow people at airports I just see the callsigns, or watch vatsim radar
It’s probably bluebellCSL, I think it comes with Xpilot now for free
Could be 🤷♂️
It doesn’t include anything old
Neither does VATSIM hahaha

But yeah, jokes apart, yeah I remember seeing 742s as 744s and stuff like that so it's probably that
I essentially don't care much about things that are not the plane I fly and the weather around me
Ahahah
Fair enough
I got the Rotate MD11P last night was gonna send it on a long haul decided against it
Might do something fun today but I have some busy business
As always, I need to fly the MD11 more 😭
But not now that it's crazy with all the 380s
Folks anybody here uses simfx in msfs? Is it worth it? I kinda wanna buy the base pack and the 737 pack, but idk
I mean if you like effects then sure?
I own simfx + 777 + 737 & they look nice I guess
whats a good GA plane for msfs
Yeah, already got the base pack and the 737, they sure do look great
Hopefully eventually they will do a pack for the 727. Would be lovely
I think its not too bad a price, converted to my local currency its pretty much pennies as far as flight sim is concerned
looks nice whenever the effects are there, not much in gameplay department but for what it costs its alright I suppose
$40 is a wonderful price tbh
And as for the other problem
It’s sold on JustFlight too
is it_
And it will get you JustFlight reward points too
Was really positively surprised when I noticed it on the website
So tempted to get it myself but am trying to wait for the passenger variant
Quite short
Impossible, there's no A380 in default XP11 in any shape or form.
@topaz geyser
I certainly didn't install anything
It's very much coming.
FJS is progressing, slower than expected, but it is, I can't share details.
It's not already out yet partially because of Jack's pride, there're few issues he absolutely wants to fix before the release.
My ears 
What airline may I ask?
Oh nevermind
I really need to try to get vatsim to run, main problem is that I don't really know how to program the fmc/mcdu
the most important thing on vatsim is to know ur plane inside out
how to fly every approach type
how to do holdings
how to do directs
and cope with manual MCP flying
Personally, the C172 + the enhancement mod
A lot of good features and stuff for a free mod, classic Cessna overwing, it just works™️
The absolute best one is obviously A2A Comanche.
Nothing beats AccuSim, period.
Have to second that, the a2a Comanche is a joy
Beyond that I'd recommend blacksquare's planes they're excellent as well
I think the only thing that is on par or beats AccuSim for any sim is the products by HotStart for X-Plane, for 12 only the Challenger, for 11 also a TBM900.
If only hotstart made the older versions of their planes 
the challenger is in both 11 and 12
Yes, that's what I meant.
For 11 both, for 12 only Challenger.
I need to get the thing already.
Will finally get the bonus next week, and I haven't made myself a proper Birthday present, so I guess I should.
I mean, to be honest, what’s the issue?
Really you just have to know how to change it in the FMC quickly, that’s it pretty much
Approaches themselves? If you’re confused by anything, just read the chart for the approach
The guy on comms? A380 I imagine.
After 800 hours and nearly 3 years of playing this sim, it was only today I realized that lens correction makes things more blurry and more difficult to to interact with instruments 
Why would you even have it on?
Lens flare doesn't exist in real life. You only see it on bad photos.
Inadequte A380 count: 3.
Two at KSEA (shouldn't be there, period), and one at PHNL (was stopping on each taxiway for 2-3 minutes and wasn't talking on CTAF at all).
747-400 my beloved
lmk how it is
Alrighty, I will
I already loaded in once, and the cockpit looks quite nice. It’s just very dark, that’s why I decided to reload somewhere where it’s daytime lol
@rustic charm any news?
So after a couple test laps I can say some things. Although I haven’t yet tried out any systems really.
- The model looks brilliant in my opinion. I genuinely like it.
- The sounds I can’t really comment on in terms of accuracy, since I’ve never heard it in reality. But I can say that it does sound old, which does enough for me.
- Flight model is… definitely a change from the 737s. Now again, I can’t comment on accuracy - I’ve never flown these in reality, and probably, even though I’d love to, never will. But I can note some things. 1) You’ll genuinely have to pull back a fair bit on takeoff. That feels realistic. With underwing engines like on 737s the thrust would push you forward and pitch you up. With the 727s engine configuration, the thrust would push you directly forward and maybe even just a slight bit down. It doesn’t rotate nearly as easily. 2) This might be my hardware issue because I am still on keyboard (It’s been a year now), but it doesn’t like changing the pitch too much. I gotta really push the keys for it to change, but again, probably a keyboard issue.
Oh and another thing - you can have a fair bit of differences on the plane. From proper old airframes, to retrofitted ones. There is an option for autothrottle, you can obviously select between 2 navigation systems (original INS and modern GPS) for now, with the third being in development. You can even have winglets on it if you want to.
The clipboard (your EFB) is quite nice too. I like that they went and did it as an actual clipboard and not an ipad - that would’ve felt very out of place. It does allow you to change the state of the plane, calculate takeoff/descent/landing, and lots you view charts too if you have access to those
Also a tiny detail which takes barely any effort, but a nice one at that - the plane has custom loading screens. None of the other planes I have do that. Does nothing really, but still nice I guess
uh?
Makes me want a GARMIN airliner ahahahaha. Airbus got fancy screens but software design stuck in the 80s.
at least on the a320 you can type on the keyboard and put in which airway you want next
if anyone can help me fix this id be pleased
im so confused how real airlines do flights like KSAN-RJAA
like, my TOW is way over whats allowed, simbrief is like "meh, youll make it", but i had to reject takeoff because i was just not gaining enough speed
dropped the flaps even lower this time around, if i cant do it second try then im going back to the gate
worked fine the second time around
You can also select higher thrust too
thank youi!!!!!
im really thinking of buying it
No problem
It really is a nice plane, but it most definitely will take some adjusting
can you? i was already at max TO
i thought the TO-20 and TO-10 were derates
I’ve completed my first flight in it, and I can say, I genuinely got task saturated. Managing the throttles (cause the autothrottle was not on the plane) while trying to follow all the gauges (screens definitely make it easier) and trying to capture the glideslope… I can only say that resulted in me coming within 250ft of the ground around a mile before threshold due to a stall
Those do sound like derates
Honestly I’m not familiar with the dreamliner at all
i mean, you didnt crash, which is instantly better than any aerosucre flight
But sometimes there’s the full thrust, derated thrust but also bump thrust. I am not sure if that would ever be used in normal operation tbh. But basically, you can squeeze more than full thrust out of the engines sometimes
I mean, we don’t have FDRs so I can’t say exactly, but it sure felt like I came within 50ft from crashing
it makes me feel happy knowing that, even just flying in MSFS with an xbox controller, i am already more qualified than most pilots at aerosucre
MD11?
no thats msfs
EGSS - RKSI Any% new WR sub 9h
idk what the fuck has been up with the winds recently
121 tail is mental
Probably the most curious thing about MD-11 is how she trims the CG with the tail fuel tank.
Basically the same thing that Concorde needs the FE to do constantly.
Bay Visual into SEA again.
No you're not
I was being funny, because their safety record is so insanely bad
iFly...max8
yes tfdi
have they said if sharklets will be free or not
because im good financially to finally get the A321/A319, and i dont want to get it now and find out i have to pay even more for the sharklets
@hollow oracle
Ah yes, that £50 plane that has working circuit breakers
Still can't believe it's only £50
Me staring at all of those high quality planes that are too expensive for me to get
My second flight in the 727 done. For now got bit more feedback, cause this time it was with a full startup from cold & dark. The systems seem to be working fine. Also has some little nueances that really differenciate it from the 73NG in terms of startup. I initially thought I would be able to do it with just my knowledge from the 73. And to be fair, in terms of actions.... it's similar, but still different. The main thing that killed me was the cockpit layout - spent waaayyy too much time looking for everything. Very different from the NG obviously.
I did not really like how it taxied. Feels bit too sluggish. Plus for me it was constantly veering off to the side, even though there wasn't anything that would've really prompted it to. Turning around in it is a bit painful, you gotta almost stop in order to get at least some ability to turn. Not ultra big issues, but a bit annoying. Personally wouldn't really count those as bad points, but wanted to put it out here.
I have a thing to say about ILS... firstly, if you go ILS, expect to be absolutely TERRIFIED. I have no idea, maybe it's accurate? Or maybe I've done something wrong? I never exclude that option, I make mistakes quite a lot. But it did not do an ILS approach as we are used to. It would just drop the nose down crazily, and then level off. And then repeat. Genuinely, scary.
A thing to say about LOCs too. It does not really tolerate going away from the path. I feel like that is realistic. But at the same time, wanna just put it here. I tried going for the localizer 3 times. First 2 times, approaching it at a 90-degree angle, as you would quite often do to be fair. But if you do that, genuinely watch the speed - if you are going too fast (I was doing around 160kts IAS with gear down and flaps 40) it can easily start turning, then not have enough space, shoot through the localizer and go off it on the other side. It will just keep the heading it left on, and you're not gonna be landing.
doing the alaskan milk run sounded fun today, i completely forgot that involves doing RNAV landings
not an issue in airbus, it is an issue in boeing, because i dont know how to do go arounds in boeing aircraft
oh thats cool
It doesn’t
I’ve flown to each and every milk run airport
Every single one has an ILS/LDA
You can avoid RNAV at all
I’ve only flown RNAV once I’m pretty sure overall, and that’s the circular RNAV into Anchorage
A type of approach. Pretty sure it’s a precision approach too. Involves a localizer and a glideslope
id honestly prefer to just do an RNAV rather than try to figure out the LDA, it looks like its essentially an ILS that isnt lined up with the runway basically, you can take the ILS down, but then you have to correct to land
The only thing about LDAs is that they’re pretty much always not gonna bring you exactly to the runway. They can be offset, either by a certain degree or distance
None of the RNAVs in the LDA airports will bring you directly down either
Well maybe Sitka might, idk, haven’t even looked at the chart there
But at Juneau/Petersburg/Wrangell you will have to align the plane with the runway by hand anyway
if im going to land by hand, id prefer to do it the whole way down rather than try to regain control last minute
You can still do that with an LDA? I mean, tbh, you wouldn’t hand-fly an RNAV either usually after all
rnav is just non-precision using waypoints right?
like, instead of a localizer directly lining you up, you just follow the waypoints, descent via the descent angle, and then you can take over to land visually
Also taking control not long before landing isn’t problematic either, only really helps me usually
Well yeah, as far as I know. But I genuinely have no idea about RNAVs, don’t fly them
Also if you get good visibility it’s your very lucky day. Out of all the times I’ve flown into Juneau, only one or 2 were on a clear day
The rest of time it gives me hell. It can be as bad as no visibility down to 500
the minimums for either landing arent great anyway
actually, the rnav landing has significantly lower minimums
Also a quick advice: don’t ignore minimums. In some of those airports they can be crazy high, but they are reasonable. Juneau (at least on LDA) has minimums over 3000. Gotta turn the knob quite a bit. But trying to land in bad visibility while ignoring them isn’t a great idea. You most likely won’t land, especially if it’s your first attempt and you’re unfamiliar with the field. And after EEF you won’t have a properly safe missed approach path, as then you’ll be rather seriously surrounded by mountains. Goarounds are still possible, but they’re not that nice from my experience
im completely lost on the LDA approach goaround too, it says to do a right turn to 310deg, and then following VORs which arent marked on the map portion on the plate
Both the NDB and the VOR are marked there
Yep
got it, the coghlan island VOR kind of blended in with the mountains
Coghland Island is an NDB, worse than a VOR lol
you loop around, intercept the outbound 251 on CGL, until you intercept the 27 on SSR, and then you can hold at either the SSR or EEF VOR/NDB
In case what, when you set up the route in the FMC, it should automatically put in the missed approach, and LNAV/VNAV will take you all through it
yeah, i have no idea how to track radials on a VOR manually whatsoever
i very roughly understand how they work, but i dont know how to set up to follow them, especially in a boeing
Just tune the VOR, choose the course and that’s it
does it do it automatically in LNAV?
Yeah
do you have to do anything to get it to follow that rather than the NAV path? im kind of confused as to how you get it to switch between the two
or is that at a point where there literally is no nav path for it to follow, or inserting a break/vectors in the plan or something
For the plane to follow the missed approach just push toga
im just waiting for the inevitable outcome where i crash on the approach into juneau and i have to deal with the crushing ego death
flight sims are currently the only thing i have any confidence with right now
I’d suggest to try something other than Juneau first
Depends on which run you do, there are better options
ive done a few non-precision approaches in the MD-11 and max 8, i have some experience, i just have to do it and learn
Cordova and Yakutat are both just ILS
Wrangell is kinda like Juneau but gives you more room for error
Sitka is quite easy
Ketchikan is just an ILS
cordova is ILS too
how is it that literally every airport except the one i want to do first is ILS 
just the terrain alone in juneau is insane for an airport at all
That’s the exact reason
No safe ILS path
Which of the milk runs do you want to do?
really any, just sounds like a fun flight, plus gets you the acchievement in volanta
every single one stops in juneau though, so you cant avoid it
Tbh I don’t really know how to get that achievement, still don’t have it myself
Probably because I do them in parts
i was going to say, i have no idea how the acchivement works either, if you have to do it in 1 flight with multiple landings, or broken up
ive considered doing gibraltar too, considering BAW does A320s on that route, and doing non-precision approaches in an A320 is extremely easy for me
I honestly can’t even tell. The most I’ve done in one sitting is Anchorage - Juneau and Ketchikan - Juneau so I never truly completed a full one
Plus even them I split those up so every leg is a separate flight
I'm proudly and confirmably consider myself a 722 expert, so feel free to ask if you got any questions.
I have a thing to say about ILS... firstly, if you go ILS, expect to be absolutely TERRIFIED. I have no idea, maybe it's accurate? Or maybe I've done something wrong? I never exclude that option, I make mistakes quite a lot. But it did not do an ILS approach as we are used to. It would just drop the nose down crazily, and then level off. And then repeat. Genuinely, scary.
That sounds a bit worse than in my experience, but yes, autopilot guidance on ILS in 727 is quite crude. Remember that it doesn't have autothrottle, so you'll have to adjust the thrust. It also likes to overcorrect and oscillate as a result. I generally prefer to fly ILS with the flight director. On the 72, FD is a completely separate system from AP, not linked in any way, and is more precise.
First 2 times, approaching it at a 90-degree angle, as you would quite often do to be fair.
Never do that. It'll try to intercept it immediately.
Only standard 30 degree intercept, or less.
I don't believe there were 72s authorized for terminal RNAV at all.
Oh, I misread, sorry.
727 with the CIVA is just pure love
im too retarded for VOR to VOR but CIVA slaps
Does not compute... In my experience, VOR to VOR is like the easiest thing ever.
But yes, CIVA is indeed fun.
LDA is, essentially, an offset ILS.
its the issue with not alot of VORs or DMEs existing
well in the EU atleast
and i have no clue how to fly approaches w VOR to VOR
https://www.pilotedge.net/pages/i-ratings I recommend doing those.
PilotEdge: professional air traffic control for flight simulators. See other aircraft, and hear other pilots on the radio. Put on your headset, dial up ground, and call for taxi. It's that easy.
Even if you don't have subscription, it has a good explanation of everything about conventional approaches.
So you can just go over it offline.
PE looks great, ive only heard good
ive been wanting to try it since vatsim is so terrible now
PE is good, but very limited, both in terms of coverage and ops they support.
its W coast US only isnt it
Also, it's much stricter than even real life, every flight is like a checkride.
I don't like that.
Anyway, got myself a Birthday present.
Yep.
Is it genuinely a standard? Cause from all of my experience in milk run airports I’m quite used to 90 degrees
I mean… at Cordova you have to intercept it technically at a near 180 angle. You approach from an almost directly opposite direction and then have to do either a full hold as charted or a teardrop shape to turn around and intercept the ILS
At Ketchikan you have to fly a DME arc for a bit iirc and then intercept at 90
Petersburg is also a DME arc and 90-degree intercept, same for sitka if you don’t do a quick approach via CLUCK
Generally 30 is the most agreed irl
Is there an F-104 on the marketplace (if there's an mscenery one just say no)
If you would need to choose between the Rotate md11, ff777 or ffA350, wich would you choose?
Kinda pulled towards the MD, cause that's different from being and Airbus, but then there's the A350 which is a real modern Airliner with modern systems etc. and it's made together with toliss, so it can't be that bad. And the 777 is iconic on its own +v2
Msfs folks. Is gyroscope drift simulated? I dont see a command for setting
777 by far
A350 is just the XP10 version with toliss systems stapled onto it
MD11 is cool but the 777 is excellent
Yeah, not entirely sure if it's a default thing or only decent aircraft have it
I expect it's default as there's a default keybind to correct the compass (k iirc)
Back garden leaf clearing 😆
Airfoillabs 737 MAX AFL 737 MAX for X-Plane After months of preparation, we're excited to officially announce our most ambitious project yet - the AFL 737 MAX for X-Plane, through our long-standing partnership with x-plane.org. As veteran members of the X-Plane ecosystem, we sincerely appreci...
Complete out of the blue
How the fuck have they kept this hidden
The stuff they make IS decent, but if you need support, or it needs an update, forget it
Eh
The majority of the stuff I’ve used from them is mostly bug free and works well
But they don’t update
It’s sure as shit gonna be better than the WW Max
Aye good stuff as I said
AFL King Air is a beauty
I should fly that thing again
Love it
But a 737max is a bit of a step away from there regular stuff
Depends on the Add-on I think
Found it. Its the D key 😅
i havent regretted buying GSX, i actually wish i bought it earlier, but i really hate how long it takes to update
it takes easily like 30 mins to do just a simple update
make sure your not nacking resources, or distracted pierracres
fatraiged pressure
If you first installed it there was a prompt telling you if you want to download additional files that will make future update downloads faster.
yes, and i did
good enough to download an update
drive speeds are good too
its the actual installer software thats extremely slow
Ok I got slower speeds than you and never had to wait more than 10 mins for an update to install 🤔
You could try asking about it in the GSX discord
bruh
i did not
expect that
not from afl atleast
oh well that flight didnt last long
i decided it was a good idea to "instant refuel" in the sky
both of my engines turned off
Are sharklets out already?
Or is that a neo
im really curious if anyone else is having issues with the cabin altitude in the fenix, because every time i tab out of the game, it skyrockets up to like 1500+fpm, if i do it enough itll exceed 10k ft and basically put the plane into emergency
the performance is okay i guess, and no simrate is really a dealbreaker for any flight over 2 hours, but the cabin vertical speed is like an actual game-breaking bug that makes it not possible to complete an A-B flight
my performance has been a LOT smoother since i learned that i was like 10 versions out of date, and with my new gaming PC (hopefully) on the way, my CPU should be able to handle the external software, but i have a feeling that cabin altitude will still be an issue
Idk if msfs uses Lua… but this seems exactly the same as an old bug with the jar A332 where the lua code would just fuck itself into a loop and kill performance for a few seconds while it figures out cabin alt
This was like XP10 days tho haha
Right when it first came out
its an issue with how the sim interacts with fenix's external software, the sim loses focus when you tab out and goes into a state where its not calculating everything very fast, and then the external software tries to interperet that slow data feed still thinking its running normally, which then sends back that data to the aircraft to show on the displays
Yeah that’s kinda how the jar bug worked. It wouldn’t interpret the data the sim was giving it correctly causing the lua to shit itself
as much as ive warmed up to the fenix, i still absolutely DESPISE how they decided to use an external software
i see no benefits from it
obviously i am wrong, there is some benefit im sure, but from just my firsthand experience, i see none
i dont think i actually ever asked here, how does that look for running MSFS?
im hoping i can atleast get like 30FPS with the fenix, enough to very comfortably fly it without any issues
benchmark videos show that you can run MSFS at a solid 60FPS with that setup
Havent had any issues with fenix, but i dont use simrate so...
fenix is only limited to 2x simrate, which is really not much of an issue, i think it needs 17FPS to function properly
The only jumpy stuff was bc 8k livery and real turb inside msfs disagreeing.
san diego is the worst airport i have ever tried to take off from, ive had to reject takeoff TWICE now, one in the 787 and one in the a320
and now the A320 is showing a fuel pump mode select fault (part of why i decided to abort takeoff), i think because i tried using the default MSFS weights panel to add more fuel for takeoff (taxi took so long that i was under my minimum takeoff fuel) default weight & balance panel distributes fuel evenly between center and wing tanks, which the a320 does NOT like, you have to empty the center tank and manually put your fuel in the wing tanks
great, now the auto brake keeps triggering when i try to set it up for the second takeoff attempt, and now im under my minimum takeoff fuel again because it took so long to taxi back around, so i have to add more fuel
i really want to enjoy the fenix, and i really want to agree that its the best aircraft for the sim, but just cant when every time i fly it, it falls out of the sky or the cabin goes above 10kft
sorry for the ghetto recording, but OBS will crash my GPU, or just overload my PC even worse
there we go, now it finally happened
my cabin is at 13000ft now and still rapidly climbing
the best thing to talk me out of buying the A321/A319 is just flying the fenix
Idk why it only seems to have issues with you.
I don’t know either, and I am 100% genuine when I say that I want to love the fenix, I literally have the airbus sidestick and full throttle set up, but it’s just not working at all
It’s like a 3/4 chance that the fenix has a catastrophic unrecoverable failure that kills the entire flight, which is unacceptable, I paid more for the TFDi MD-11 and it’s literally in alpha, and it performs better
I’m just hoping that my new PC will fix all this, and I can actually fly the fenix, and just completely uninstall the latinvfr/horizon sim stuff
My fenix falls 1,000 ft when i used the realistic turbulance setting in msfs, am now on low, no trouble.
I flew with the realistic turbulence setting for a while with the fenix before realizing that’s not recommended, and I never experienced any issues whatsoever
I fly it with low turbulence now
Fenix A320 omg
I´m a bit late to the party, but after coming back home I want to give the FBW A380 a try. Tried setting up a flight from EDDF to KJFK. I vaguely remember the FBW EFB has a take-off performance calculator, but for some reason it doesn´t show up in the A380? User error or does the EFB just simply not have one? 🤔
Me when all the good addons are way too expensive for me to buy
the a380 doesnt have one
you're gonna have to use simbrief
Ah, I see, thanks. Well, that's a bummer, I find the EFB-integrated calculators more convenient to use.
True, but some EFBs need work as they miscalculate the performance to be a "stall climb t/o"
I trust Simbrief's more than built-in EFBs
Oh my god
I hate NAVIGRAPH SO MUCH
I JUST WANNA USE THE UPLINK IN THE FENIX A320
This whole airac thing is bullshit
Why does every plane support the flight plan uplink on every airac UNLESS the fenix a320
Real
just fenix things™️
also me who doesn't have the money to buy an addon plane
oh, shartlets are out
Standard intercept of localizer or VOR radial is 30 degrees. 90 is not forbidden, but my point was specifically about the 727 autopilot.
It freaks out if you try to intercept at steep angles.
A350 is pretty poor (as anything Airbus from FF). I think it at least isn't outright broken nowadays, but there's nothing good about it.
FF777v2... Well, I saw people complaining about it, but I also saw people calling it the best thing ever, so idk.
MD-11 IMO is a safe buy, it isn't like the best thing in the world, but what it does, it does perfectly.
Well, in my community someone pointed out that they also never released the DC-3 they promised ages ago, BUT. My initial reaction was, "it's not April 1st."
Knowing AFL, they got it commissioned for commercial and decided to make a consumer version as a side gig.
i really dont know why people give the FBW A32NX so much garbage
performs great, flies great, i just wish they would work on the both the external and cockpit model a bit more
does FPA in the A320 let you follow a degree descent path rather than a fpm descent path?
im curious if that's what your supposed to do with localizer approaches, using FPA and setting the approach angle in degrees rather than eyeballing the FPM value from the chart
I don’t think you can set the path in degrees, in any plane pretty much. I think you need to go fpm, and there should I think be a table on the chart telling you which descent you need for your speed
FPM worked, the chart said it was a 3.5deg glideslope, and i set it to 3.5, and i took it down past minimums actually because i was so comfortable with how it was doing
i did touch down quite late, but well enough to fully stop and turn off, so it wasnt that big of a deal
Today's flight is, greatly unfortunately, one of those rare ones that do not end well. It was almost all good, but everything went wrong in just several seconds
And I had under 20 miles to go. Was turning into final
Looks nice
las vegas is super fun to fly in/out of, the flytampa scenery is great
Oh yeah, I've been looking at it for a while ngl
I've got FlyTampa Boston and it's definitely the best airport I have
performance definitely takes a hit, but not bad at all, my potato can run it
Well, tbh I have bought Sochi and haven't flown to it yet, so idk, but that probably isn't as good
For me Boston doesn't even affect performance really
Compared to ini JFK it's nothing
thats because JFK/EWR/LGA are right in downtown new york, theyre always going to be extremely laggy to fly in/out of regardless of scenery
Nah, default JFK wasn't really
Plus for Boston, not only do I have the ultra detailed airport, but also the scenery pack for the city
And for NY, I don't have one
And iniJFK takes like 10 minutes to just load in. When I spawn in, the terminals don't even show up usually. They then just appear over time while everything loads
we do a little simulated flying
the penix
I just wanted to differ it from the fenix one
It seems like FBW has won itself over for me cuz when i need to pay a additional monthly price off 10 fucking euros just to use then f-pln uplink then no thank you
maybe ill get the A321
but that depends
im just going to wait for my new PC to get the A321
i saw that tool, and i was like "theres no way its that easy", and it is
easily boosted my FPS upwards of 10FPS, just have to remember to do it every month
huh, since when did the PMDG 737s have FO speed callouts?
that has to be the update from the other day
Is the A350 poor even though they contributed with Toliss?
That kinda un-poored it for me
In the end I decided for the Md11 as everyone told me not the A350 and the choice of the 777 and MD was both based on me Cargo flying, buuuuut since the V2 doesn't have the cargo plane yet, it got to be the Md11. Which is, let's say interesting. System wise kinda similar to an Airbus, more than I thought, but with yokes. Kinda cool. It's fun!
You can only fix so much. I don't know the current state of the A350 in details and I plan to study it, but if the choice is between FFA350 and Rotate MD-11, MD-11 wins by far.
In the end it's probably a lot like my DCS planes, you don't decide which one to get and which one not to get, you just decided about the order in which you get them
M, not necessarily.
Been there forever
is it an option that you can select?
would explain if thats so, being that some liveries wouldnt have it selected by default
Its in the FMC pmdg setup
got it, good to know
Have to turn headset audio off in msfs settings to hear them
the most handy thing i have learned, is that the slower you land, the less energy you slam into the ground with essentially, and it took me 60 flights to figure this out
the trick is balancing a speed that wont piss off ATC, and slow enough to get a comfortable landing
landing is really just a controlled stall
The trick is to touchdown around vref where applicable.
The biggest lie in history of flight simulation.
Lol
Lmao
FSS Embraer A/P... mind boggling on how to use it 😅
The RJ is out
For those who have neither RJ nor BAe, there is a bundle containing the 2 too. They cost £52.49 each standalone, the bundle is £94.45, so you’d be saving 10 quid
niceeee
I love vatsim
Average vatsim experience?
Average 122.8 / 121.5
i literally just realized
SSW is split-scimitar winglets,
BW are blended winglets
may I ask how I get onto vatsim?
can someone please help me file a flightplan for vatsim, I'm a bit confused
congrats 😂
so what do I do if there's no ground controller
oh lord this is scary
I'm so scared that my idiot self will say something stupid
is vatsim just for extroverts or something
this is the most scared I've ever been
not to be offensive
You’re not being offensive lol
That’s entirely the reason why I still haven’t tried it
Plus often nobody’s controlling Alaska anyway
I'm in denver right now
scariest part is that I don't know when I can talk because sometimes I just don't hear anything
like right now it says someone is talking but I don't hear a thing
Honestly, starting in a bit of a quieter area would probably be better
Looking at Volanta right now, in US you have San Diego which is moderate traffic, and Nashville which right now looks rather empty
the sound is backish
constant start stops
gonna go to nashville
mostly I'm just scared that I'm going to sound strange
Every person probably does when just starting
the controller at nashville is actually chill omg
and there also a real pilot at the airport as well
get beyondATC!!!!
it has voice recognition, practice with BATC for a handful of flights, and you should be set to go with VATSIM
the voice recognition is very good too, im a very quiet person and it picks up my voice pretty great
Today’s flight done. Same route as yesterday’s failed one
You think I've got the money?
Gonna try again tomorrow, just gotta pray that there are controllers at the airports I want to fly at
I bought BATC and turns out it can’t be used in Russia. But I at least have it, so could be worse
Sad
Transmit on advisory your intentions.
For other traffic to know.
Well, if there's higher level controller, contact them.
VATSIM uses top down coverage, CTR -> APP/DEP -> TWR -> GND -> (RMP).
So Center controls everything unless there's a separate staffed position, Tower does runways and Ground.
Well, you have to be able to talk to people, but I mean...
You're doing it here, right now.
On this very server.
VPN could help.
if you find an airport that has controllers on, connect as an observer & just listen to what people ask for & what they get given
its an easy way to get an idea on what to do to get going
& you won't be in anyones way, so can just chill at the gate
its a real thing
i do plan on making the kamala/walz campaign 737BBJ as well, the idea being a "2024 campaign pack"
im not sure if ill get the kamala/walz livery done this weekend because i have a few things planned, but it is coming next
Campaign aircraft make me laugh
It’s so fucking American
You come over here in election season and you have a big bus usually with a lie plastered across the side of it
You guys have 737’s 
BoeingBusJet 🤣
not only that, all politicans go on and on about how theyre "fighting for the working class" while flying private 737s everywhere
i really fucked up the landing so i only really did this flight for the screenshots
thats fucking wild, from the MSFS discord
Where's RFK's jet?
he actually doesnt have one aparently, just red and blue
there is that though, and politics aside, what the fuck 
as someone who works on planes this is really really not recomended
thats him walking back from the bathroom too lmao
yeah
barefoot in an aircraft toilet is really bad
don't do this
people talk about MERSA
this is a really good way to contract it
Early morning BEL hop
Well I'm not using my actual voice am I?
That´s as far as I got. Under 10 FPS at FRA is just no fun. The plane looks good, I just FBW will improve its performance, soon.
So instead I took the new A320 with winglets for a "late afternoon" (local time) flight.
The A380s performance is very underwhelming, I had so many plans for flights in it, but never got further than takeoff because of how awful it performs




