#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
Enjoy!
i would get the TFDi MD-11, but i have the skysim one and ive never actually quite figured it out yet
MD-11, from a surface glimpse, isn't that different from something like a 73CL or MD-80.
At least in terms of logic.
It's my next thing to learn since the PAX variant was just released by Rotate.
no, i might get the MD-11, considering its the more expensive option and my current positive financial situation, plus the A321/A319 are different but very, very similar to the base A320
if im going to get a new plane, id prefer getting one to learn
The MD-11 seems rather nice in terms of systems
plus, i dont entirely trust the simulation of skysim 
I am frankly not the biggest fan of how it looks from the outside, but that’s not overly important
i have that enhancement pack, but i think id rather fly the TFDi one, because then im 100% confident the systems are accurate enough that i wont encounter a bug that throws me off learning it
Why? No account for taste, but I absolutely love the look of the MD-11.
There are only 2 reasons why I haven’t bought the thing yet - I usually do short haul, like, the longest of my flights are US transcontinentals, and I’ve only done 2 (although one was in a 738…). The other reason is that I kinda dislike the way TFDi handled the ER variant. Locking an airframe behind a preorder, and only for a limited amount of those preorders, is a no way in my book.
Oh, by the "looks from the outside" you mean the TFDi modeling, not the plane itself?
Idk something just irks me about the texturing on the exterior. The cockpit looks brilliant. The exterior, there’s just something that looks bit eh to me. I can’t really pinpoint what. Could be the weathering
Fair enough.
The only TFDi product I ever used was SmartCARS 3 and I have nothing but bad impressions and promblems about it.
Time to install software that literally lists Pentium 4 as minimum system specs... Fligth sim can get weird.
(PFPX for the reference... Does anyone even remember that?)
i ended up buying the MD-11
plus the passenger variant
i dont plan on flying the passenger version all too much, but its nice to have, i like the american airlines bare aluminum on it
I gotta say, when flying IRL, one of my favorite things is to watch trains go about their business.
I imagine tracks are great for VFR; you can just follow the track and not worry about navigating.
You know the joke? "Yes, I fly IFR - I Follow Roads/Rivers/Rails."
ahahaha.
You really want to reengage that offtopic discussion in which no one will convince anyone but everyone will end up hating on each other?
Nah I just work up for work and saw funny comment
Btw has anyone seen the new Toliss ISCS? Directly implemented into the tablet
It seems to me like new cockpit textures again as well?
I heard about it. Does it have a pop-up?
Actually, knowing ToLiss, it should.
Yeh the tablet has been in for a while but the ISCS was always a popup
With Ground Services accessible by the radios
Can’t tell if it’s just shitty quality Facebook screenshots or new textures
No, my question is, can one pop-up the ISCS from the tablet.
I think before it was only AVITAB, and it wasn't pop-up.
But I haven't flown ToLiSS in... Hot damn, years at this point.
Ah, they moved performance to the tablet from ISCS?
That's good.
I’m just guessing the ISCS is gonna be another page where the menu is still accessible via the xp menu system
Kinda?
Wdym?
For known fields, that is... ISCS calculator a few times calculated me numbers for runways not existing in databases.
That's something that super annoys me about... what's its face... the VPT.
It only calculates for a specific set of most used airports.
And doesn't allow to just feed in random numbers and get them calculated.
Again this is why perf req is better
Doesn’t do that
Takes what it knows, winds, runway length and perf then calculates based on that
Okay. Sorry, I'm not familiar with it enough.
Looking forward to figuring it our tho.
So I was figuring out what to do with stutters in XP12. I have sort of a weird contraption called i9-12950HX for the CPU. It's a laptop high-end CPU with 8 hyperthreading high-performance cores and 8 efficiency cores (totaling in 8*2+8=24 logical cores).
I have most things almost maxed out, so in an environment with a mix of a lot of clouds and a lot of buildings, even at around 40 FPS in general, on any significant change of view or even a sharp turn, I had CPU spikes to 100% and as a result FPS drops to like 20 if not 10. Because it mostly was happening when maneuvering, it caused a few significant issues in terminal environment, and (I suspect) caused at least one crash (mix of flight model going bonkers and my inability to correct due to stutters).
First thing I did is tried turning both on and off threaded optimization. On Auto or Global it was reverting to Off, so I forced it to On. And surprisingly, it already made it better. Stutters weren't gone, but they got much shorter.
Then I set (first) num_workers to 8, half the number of performance cores. And oh miracle, stutters were completely gone, because it put whatever the CPU was doing on specific cores and freed up the remaining ones to do the rest of the calculations. After experimenting, I stopped at -num_workers=10 as a good compromise between FPS and stutters reduction (at =16 all the performance cores were still getting loaded so still bad), and the experience is much smoother.
Same
I see them here and there
Only commuters though, I bet freight would look cooler
#535249224254619648 message
Has anyone else here had this problem with the ini A320neo roll deadzone?
I brought it up on their server but ended up talking to a brick wall that only acknowledged pitch (which I said more than once was fine)
There doesn't seem to be any option to reduce it (unlike the Fenix), and I seem the only person in the world to ever complain or even notice that 😭
im in love with the MD-11
coming from an airbus, it is SO similar
the jump from the A320 to the MD-11 was significantly easier than the jump from the A320 to the A300
toolbar pushback was not happy with the MD-11 though, i might need to update some things with it, not sure
oops
Suboptimal
wtf
Alaska 65
Seattle - Anchorage
Via Ketchikan, Wrangell, Petersburg and Juneau
Wrangell, Petersburg and Juneau are rather challenging approaches in bad weather
my attention spam will not last that long
Could just do part of it
Ketchikan - Wrangell - Petersburg - Juneau is the most interesting part
hmm
If you don’t actually wait for all the ground operations and start setting up for the departure right after the arrival, the 3 flights can take as little as 2:30
Even 2:00 tbh
Let me just load up volanta and see how much time I recorded the last time I did those
I usually have no issues doing flights up to 4h+ but for some reason today Im just not in the mood..
So my total block time for those 3 legs was 1:50
Welp, with a max, yeah, MSFS is a no go for now
Ive got sick of the pmdg 737's sounds
Tbh I don’t mind sounds too much. But I am overall not as critical of sounds anywhere
get ftsim
it's like 3 euros a month
might do so
doing a flight on xp rn to kmco
Safety last

wasnt my idea to fly in it. brother wants to learn to fly a319 so im teaching him
also he did the simbreif plan on his own so hes learning..
i shut off the engines too, no hydraulics to control anything 
What did autoassign this route?
Also, in the end of the day, you are the captain. If you don't like the enroute or arrival weather, it's your responsibility to say "no."
Eh... I think you guys went to master degree material straight from grade school.
Ah, just screwing around.
Carry on.
thats how i end my flights that i dont have the time to finish, i dont just exit to the menu, i cut all engines, i put it into a dive, and watch
Oh. No, I can't afford that mindset. Each of my flights is training for IRL in one way or another.
If the engines are cut, I still need to at least get it on the ground safely.
Or on water. Whatever is more serviceable.
the good news is that the closest i will ever get to flying an aircraft is those foam gliders you get at the dollar store
Aerosoft's A330 makes Rivet look competent 
i love spending like 3 hours on a flight, risking being late for class, only for the glideslope to not lock on, trying to use FPA and that also doesnt put me in the right spot, localizer not centering me with the runway
i thought that you just armed approach/land on the FCU in the MD-11, but that didnt work
it showed both the glideslope and the localizer on the display, but it just didnt follow either
go-around did not work either, i tried physically pushing the throttles, did not work, i also tried the TOGA button, also did not work
when i touched down, off center and above glideslope, i was getting GPWS alarms and the engines were trying to push me back up
the minimums didnt work either, i set it to baro 747 as is on the approach plate, yet it called out minimums at radio 200
English please?
Creo que usé ingles, ¿no?
What I mean is, initial training is done in clear skies in a GA plane, not in an airliner through a freaking hurricane.
Which you are supposed to know if you hold a Private.
Right but a kid who's just turned 13 ain't gonna do a private at his age..
And yh hurricane situation was just bc he was bored
Just completed my first transcontinental flight
San Diego to Boston
In a 738 as an Alaska flight
Thought it would be my longest flight, but turns out not. My first transcontinental (Newark - LA) was 5:10, just a couple minutes longer than today
KTPA attempt in Milton
the MD-11 is starting to get on my nerves
GSX pushback is the only pushback tool that works with it, you cant use toolbar pushback
if you dont have GSX, shift+P is your only option to pushback, and thats straight out only
aint much longer than this
or this
take 10 or so min off because of some MSFS kid
Doesn’t surprise me xD
full stop on the runway when I was on a 5 mile
thats the top reason why i dont use vatsim, i am that MSFS kid
Yeah
I always try to not even stop on the runway at all, just get everything set up beforehand and start the takeoff roll as soon as lined up
third time's the charm i guess 🥲
Of course I have a lot more freedom and choice due to not having any ATC or traffic. But if I’m not ready, can just hold short after all.
first ever landing in the MD-11, -304fpm, not bad at all
no bounce either, took a second for the nose gear to touch down but by that point the rear gear was already braking so i wasnt too worried
some daytime screenies too
Landing rate plugins and simmers obsession with fpm on landing annoys me. Its not how its done. A decent firm landing on the right spot is the way to do it.
Pick a spot and judge your landing by how close to that spot you get
at the very least, its an indication of how hard of a landing it was
very obviously a -200fpm landing is going to be good, a -700fpm one is going to be extremely hard
But a smooth landing doesn’t equal a good landing
A good landing is a safe landing
If you landed smooth as butter but then overrun the runway and ended up in a nearby river, that’s not a good landing
I just try to land safely within the touchdown zone
Also the plugins that rate the landing with FPM are all saying something different
That’s cause they calculate differently
And many aren’t exactly accurate
Volanta for example iirc averages the last few seconds before landing
My previous 2 flights, JFK - Boston and San Diego - Boston
im getting my $80 worth out of the MD-11 today 
no plans to finish the AAL flight outside of just some screenshots and checking out the passenger version, but i did do 2 full flights today
Anyone recommend this?
The E-Jets series revolutionized regional jet travel and set the benchmark in performance efficiency and comfort in the single-aisle segment It is a successful line of 70 to 150 seat passengers rsquo jets with over 80 airlines flying the model and an average mission completion rate of 99 9 This...
Got it, are there any solid embarers for the sim right now?
no 
Damn 😔
I bought the freighter & pax versions & aside from 1 test flight I haven't flown it
mainly due lack of time
my favorite thing ever is flying for an hour and then realizing you fucked up the landing last second
i could have gone around, but im not acquainted enough the systems in boeing aircraft to do it safely
same weird situation as the MD-11 actually, it was showing the localizer and glideslope on the display, wouldnt lock onto either, freq was wrong and when i tried to enter in the correct one, it kept thinking it was a VOR
both happened in toronto, different runways, and i did manage to land in the MD-11 eventually, so i have no clue if the airport data is bad or not, could easily just be that my last flight in a boeing 737 was almost a full month ago (i have flown the 787 since then, but different levels of simulation)
think most of my sim flying has been equally with the A321 & 777
lots of short ish hops in the 321 & my entire sunday spent on a London to Hong Kong flight
the latter of which I endeavour to continue this evening
honestly regret buying it
it was something like twice the price of the Fenix
it's maybe half as refined and detailed
VR somehow doesn't work properly, only on the MD-11
the attitude their devs seem to have toward their community isn't exactly positive either
Doesn’t surprise me
its too expensive apparently
Expensive landing fees
The low-cost airline Ryanair is drastically reducing its offering in Germany. The company says it will stop all operations in Dortmund, Dresden and Leipzig and reduce the number of flights in Hamburg by 60%, resulting in a loss of 1.8 million seats. Ryanair's CEO Eddie Wilson speaks of a “failure by the government to reduce extremely high access costs”. That's why Germans pay the highest airfares in Europe.
Trying to teach my younger brother to fly a a319 is chaos
Yeah
im not too suprised that airlines are starting to leave
We deleted Frankfurt Main in 2020, Berlin is getting reduced the only ones that aren’t are Hahn, Memmingen and Karlsruhe
Köln will probably b next on the chopping block
Nah it’s one of the ones that’s maintaining the amount of flights lmao
For like 15 years
bruh i missed something big clearly
We need the Dutch government to fix up soon because we want lelystad flights for Amsterdam
EJ and RYR own that place
I don’t think it’s even in the top 10 bases tbh
wow im actually suprised
thats crazy
pity that no direct flights to london anymore
Casually 151 destinations from Stansted
DHL own that place
They dictate the fees
Weeze is even getting smaller
There were talks to operate a new base at Geilenkirchen Air Base a few years ago to replace Köln, Weeze and Dortmund
Would also probably delete Maastricht
Seen the LVFR 330 pop up and am wondering which one is worse, that or Aerosoft 330
aerosoft
u can atleast land the lvfr a330
Is the aerosoft one that unflyable 
ohh yess
I haven’t looked at it almost at all, ain’t the plane I’m interested in. But sounds like it’s just awful
it bumps like up
and then down
and sometimes it likes to go 350 kts
upon touchown
Unflyable indeed
Or well, unlandable at the very least
But I expect unflyable too
I’ve seen that it can’t even give you an ETA
Pascal testet den neuen A330 von Aerosoft. Wie wird er sbschneiden?
Ich bin NICHT Pascal von AeroNewsGermany
Wenn Du möchtest, kannst Du AeroNewsGermany hier unterstützen:
Als Kanalmitglied: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCipwt-3-cptv9K6uhfZ61GA/membership
Über Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/aeronewsgermany
Folge AeroNewsGermany hier:
...
watch from timestamp for like
10-20 secs?
That’s so sad…
It just went up
Because it wanted to
The plane be like “I say we go around now”
Thank you very much @AerosoftFlight for providing my review copy of the A330.
Join my channel!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJku5jC23Y0MkmPqU7CZhog/join
If you don't want to join, but still support me consider a small donation:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/737NGDriver
Join my Discord Server!
https://discord.gg/aPreKRj6ws
My system specs:
I...
here it just jumps up again
lol
Yeah…
No idea how the LVFR one is but I’m also rather sure that it got released mainly just to get some sales before MSFS 2024, which has its own 330, drops
Just watched it… “We are accelerating… in maximum reverse…”
hmmmmm
how the fuck did this even get released
just from that video alone, a regular flight has bugs in every single stage
and not even like "you wouldnt realize this is a bug unless if you know the aircraft extremely well irl". like glaring actual bugs even casual players would spot
okay, this really takes the cake 
you cant even input holds????
you MUST land otherwise, good luck holding for a go around 
Well, sometimes you don’t need to hold for a goaround, which would be lucky in this case
But the lack of holds is…
Disturbing to say the least
u cannot do rnav
It should be implemented, of course, but you could always shock horror just fly it manually. Not remotely realistic, but fun
Flying something big manually is fun
The endless landsea of the Midwest...
one other huge thing i really enjoy with the MD-11, i rarely use the EFB with it
i use it for takeoff/landing calculations and setup, outside of that, i actually hide it for 99% of the flight
it does have navigraph integration, but for some reason it keeps logging me out (like a few other aircraft too), so i dont bother re-logging in every flight
TNCM in 2024
i did my first ever flight between the same two airports, honolulu and LAX
i did it in the 77W not too long ago, and now i did it in the MD-11F
technically my second longest flight too, i didnt use much sim rate at the beginning, so i got a solid 2 hours in
i like flying freight because it means i can have an exceptionally shitty landing and not have any customer complaints 
a landing is just a landing
even if its a space shuttle landing
How
I haven't met a real world pilot who'd be against a smooth landing, conditions permitting. Firm has its place and time.
Not necessarily.
Depends very much on the airframe
The firmness of a landing is much less defined by the vertical speed than by the touchdown g-force.
So touchdown at 700-fpm-and-decreasing might be about the same as at 200-and-increasing.
Anyway, the main criteria of a good landing are the stability and the spot (centerline and distance). Stable approach on final means no parasitic forces nor excessive corrections. Centerline means good directional control. Distance means at least sufficient runway and at most a perfect turnoff.
If you manage to do it smoothly, it's a nice addition, but it never should be the goal.
That's... a T16kM for Xbox.
Correction, T.Flight. I didn't know about this thing admittedly.
Yeah, looks like a different color limited edition.
reminds me I need a new Hotas
After 5h10 Landing in GCLA
old livery is peak
it really is
You've never met a navy pilot then
On an aircraft carrier, a smooth landing would basically equal testing out the plane’s swimming abilities 
Ngl, I want to get the A321/A319 eventually, but I’m so glad I went with the MD-11 before it
My most popular screenshot so far 
A321 is definitely my most flown aircraft as of late, with the 777 coming in 2nd
I bought the MD11 but haven't flown either much, perhaps that may change
Get out the aircraft is cool, but really disappointed I cant steal another plane from the ramp
as someone who flys in planes daily this isn't true lmao
90% of the time its get down and get out
Are you flying for a low coster, perchance?
Also, it's not mutually exclusive. Also, if you don't care, it doesn't mean no one in the company cares. My knowledge/experience comes from people who fly daily as well.
He works for ryanair, which makes complete sense 
I’m surprised they haven’t snapped a 737 in half with how hard they land
Huh, I see. I'm around the industry for over 15 years now, so...
Let's say, it's hard to feed me subjective things.
Look up any rough landing compilation and 3/4 will be ryanair winglets
Hard landings from various planes, airlines and locations.
Credit:
Vid 1: https://youtu.be/IeP7baEXEno
Vid 2: ?
Vid 3: ?
Vid 4: https://youtu.be/mYngZwLcIHk
Vid 5: ?
Vid 6: ?
Vid 7: https://youtu.be/TC6uKISnPH8
Vid 8: https://youtu.be/BuH8ZFpNwFA
Vid 9: https://youtu.be/6IoLFuPCHeU
Vid 10: https://youtu.be/gng20L68ELo
Vid 11: ?
Vid 12: https:...
They operate with this ideology, hard landings, but that means you can stop quicker, get to the ramp quicker, turn around and leave quicker
My favorite thing to say is, there're at least 1000 ways to fly any airframe in existence, and every pilot that flew for a single company all their life thinks that theirs is the only permitted one.
"Flied." I invent word
I mean, quick & stiff landings are literally ryanair policy, not the individual pilot
Anyways... Associated with it is my favorite story I saw happening on a Russian forum, where two RW pilots on the same type got into a fight and called each other "dumb simmers" over differences in the SOPs.
Can't make that up.
When both learned that each one is a line pilot, the argument ended abruptly and awkwardly.
That'd be funny
Lol

i thought i was going to have an aerosucre takeoff, i was in taxi and i was really struggling to accelerate, even going like 30kts felt like i was crawling
turns out the sim had somehow gone into sub-1x sim rate
"sorry sir zhe cargo door es closed"
"well cant you just open it"
"nien"
i dont get it, this is a real approach
how does any airliner do this
im still having issues with the plane wanting to loop around waypoints 180deg when encountering a steep turn too
i tried correcting it and almost went into an uncontrolled spin by a too extreme bank angle
this has happened on almost every single flight ive done
i didnt even know initial approaches existed before right now
ill be crushing like 3 flights a day, and then i get a few devastating errors in one flight and all of my confidence in flying is completely gone
Very common misconception
I can assure you for the majority of pilots I’ve spoken to at Ryanair, Lauda, BA, ITA, along with my experiences flying with all these carriers it’s usually just get it down and get out
There is a time and a place for smooth landings
Not when you have just finished a 12h shift and want to get home
The most beautiful livery in existence.
All Nippon current livery is just perfect. I hope they won't change.
That is all I was arguing. Everything else is circumstantial.
Depends. Looks rather nice if you consider just the modern liveries. If you take into account liveries from back in the day, it’s barely in the top.
The only retro livery that beats out any modern ones is the US airways livery
The rest are yucky, I puke every time I see them
That’s quite an opinion
Especially that half of the modern liveries are plain white planes with just painted engines and tails
And a further quarter of modern liveries is just that plus painted bottom of the fuselage
my first time ever doing a ANA flight. It was either this one or taking a Cathay 777 out of Hong Kong
bought a new plane ❤️
AAL retro beats the majority of modern liveries. AAL Astrojet does too. Alaska’s 70s does. BOAC does. BEA does. United Tulip does. Delta Widget does. And I’m too lazy to remember further
how is it?
It's... usable sort of
First, I'd like to say, I love the guy that made the plane, because out of all the planes in the world he could have made for Xplane, he decided to make that plane. I'll always appreciate that.
But, engine power seems a little odd? Seems like most of the power is between 95 and 100% (about a 2/3% N2), I was crushing at about 96/97% N2 and climbing at 98/99% N2 (for comparison the F28's climb power is 96%, 732 is 91% N2).
Some things in the cockpit don't light up when they should (most notably the UFC/MCP buttons.
The interaction system is AWFUL. No scrolling with the mouse wheel, just have to hunt for the TINY click spot that turns the knob the direction you want to, and either spam left mouse click, or hold, forget to try and do what while you have head tracking active. I always have to toggle it to stay still
Some features are not modelled, some are understandable, especially as they were only used in the military version, but I don't see why TACAN doesn't work.
Flight model is a bit odd, especially stalling. You can get to 80/90kts, and it will just keep more or less the same deck angle, but will just sink, but in normal operations is OK, although flaps seem to have a tiny effect on trim (opposite of the 732 and 727, no idea if it's realistic), Drag seems really high, both on the ground and in the air it always feels like you're keeping the throttles at a pretty high setting during all phases of flight
Everything looks kind of dated and low Res
But it's a VFW-614 😍 so we can forget those niggly little faults
looks like the airbus test livery lol
its peter hager
I think his dad used to fly them thats why he made it
other than the fact its hager I probably wouldn't mind it tbh
Nice, whatever the reason, I'm happy I can fly that plane in something more modern than FSX 🙂
and yeah, it's overpriced, but considering how tiny the customer pool is, I'm OK with giving him that much money
does anyone else ever get that issue where they accidentally right click on a display to move the camera, which selects a text box, and then you cant unselect it because its not in camera anymore
how do i fix that
the MD-11 is starting to get o nmy nerves
no pushback system has worked, every one is broken, and i cant find a profile for toolbar pushback for the MD-11
plus the bug of it looping around waypoints with tight turns 180deg is a known bug with no fix
for some reason, frankfurt's cargo area doesnt have pushback tugs by default, so im kind of fucked, i have to start and then just taxi out myself
awesome, now im getting no tiller movement, rudder is moving
nothing changed, i set up the aircraft as normal, no settings for "rudder controls tiller" in the EFB
Yeah, I guess "currently used" would be more accurate.
Departure from KMFR.
I can really recommend when the 32 is in ops, it includes an interesting climbing hold.
Well, not interesting, but at least something to spice things up.
what do people even use for pushback, i cant find a single solution that works reliably
outside of just pushing straight out using shift+P
BetterPushback is still the best for XP12.
id rather fucking eat broken glass than spend $30 on GSX
i might buy GSX and just deal with the financial hit later
is there any performance impact with GSX?
Welcome to sim life aviation, hope you like instant ramen.
kinda feel the same, should have chosen the rotate one instead
Sounds like gsx
Terrible program
Shift+P and default ATC to turn
Tune ground frequency > Ground Services and then you can tell it go left or right.
Awesome program imo
anyone know when the iflymax might release?
nobody knows but iFly
fe
if the pushback wouldnt break every single time yes
It doesn't for me so 🤷♂️
For now all I’ve heard about GSX is literally that it’s wonderful in what it adds, but likes to break xD
for those who wanna know the iFly sevenhundred & thirtyseven MAX number 8 is out now in pre-release
Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group
I Think I'm Going To Kill Myself · Elton John
Honky Chateau
℗ 1972 This Record Company Ltd.
Released on: 1972-01-01
Producer: Gus Dudgeon
Studio Personnel, Engineer: Ken Scott
Associated Performer, Vocals, Piano: Elton John
Associated Performer, Bass Guitar, Background Vocalist: Dee Murray
A...
every time i buy something expensive, get ready for another thing that i want to also release
lmfao
atleast i have the PMDG one
i like
kinda wish it would actually load the aircraft during the visual loading processes, but its whatever
(also, is there any good scenery for the freight apron at EDDF
)
aerosoft eddf
It does that with the md-80, not sure of any other aircraft that happens with though
No MED
Disappointed
First time doing this in a MAX cockpit as well today
what
Nope
(I mean, tbf, I wouldn’t be able to visually distinguish the 2
)
It’s only an option selected by Ryanair due to the high capacity config on our max’s
-900er also has them
On some planes
At least there's no jump seat on that one
There is
I was sat in it today
No a and no def
Actually this is very wrong
27 a and f doesn’t exist because emergency exit
And 26 F doesn’t exist because there is a jumpseat
This is correct
Holy shit haha they actually modeled it
I think the fenix does too, on loading there’s a GSX option
Wish that was the standard rather than the exception
I need to slow down with setting up my aircraft anyway, so I don’t mind having a cool animation to keep me occupied
I do find it very annoying that you can't load bags while loading fuel, but otherwise when it's working I do like the addon
This is semi accurate
US only thing
We can’t do it in the UK either
You can in some other places
Depends on Airline Choice I would presume
I’m looking at some videos of the ifly max and I’m really liking it
There are a couple really peeving problems mainly the ACP is quite wrong in terms of design
Also the really annoying thing is the fucking Night mode lights is the wrong shade of blue
Can you tell I have a touch of the tism?
where is the cargo apron at EDDF?
i thought it was red, but apparently its blue?
both have passenger and freight aircraft parked
GSX said that the gates in the red area were "isolated" and had no ground service for some reason
There're at least two.
just one, the bottom right is the rwy07L/25R view
im not surprised i got it completely wrong 
Oh. Right.
airports are extremely, extremely chaotic in their layout, regardless of how sophisticated or unsophisticated they are
Sorry, I'm falling asleep.
Don't ever, ever, ever go to KORD.
ohare is a nightmare for literally everbody
it sucks for pilots, it sucks for ground crew and maintenance, it sucks for passengers
I can’t remember what twy it is that’s literally off-roading
Today on stream we were chatting about confusing airports, I mentioned KJFK, then someone mentioned KORD, and I realized that I've experienced it, but my brain just completely blocked out that nightmare.
JFK is not very complex, but it's very dense and saturated.
A rush hour roundabout.
IMO the best layout is groups of runways with terminals stretched in-between, think KATL or KDFW.
KMSP as a smaller example.
never had any issues with Dallas Fort Worth aerodrome
looks chaotic as fuck but never had any issues arriving or departing
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It's a very logical layout.
Red is where terminal 3 is being built
this game just violently refuses me to fly lufthansa cargo flights
this is the 4th or 5th attempt? still havent taken off
this time engine 2 wouldnt start, even though engines 1 and 2 were started
going out of sequence and doing 3-2-1 rather than 3-1-2 worked
make that 6
i forgot volanta doesnt like simbrief flight plans that are older than a few days, plus its good practice to actually re-submit after a few days to get up-to-date numbers
and MSFS crashed
does the ifly 737 max have realistic MCAS nosedive/engine heater catastrophic failure/random speedbrake deployment simulation? 
did they ever find out what made that ryanair flight nosedive too? that wasnt MCAS related but it was a boeing failure
aaib still aint figured that one out
not MCAS
either gonna be a crew fuckup or a control system failure
control system failure
you dont know that 🤷♂️
it was a max 8 involved
doesn't need to mean anything
holy shit 
-790fpm landing
it would NOT go down, for some reason engines would not throttle back, so i ended up having to push down the nose really hard towards the runway
the aircraft went way below the glideslope too, i was getting a sink rate warning
i dont know if i want to delete it and redo the flight for the 9th time
that ties for my worst landing ever
i mean, it was right inside of the touchdown zone, centered
Just a reminder that those -790 may well not be your actual landing ‘hardness’
The value could be big because you had a steeper descent rate before touchdown. Those numbers ain’t really all accurate, and a landing shouldn’t be judged just by that
odds are its not an issue with the max
if it was then we would have seen a lot more from the AAIB
That's way more important
probably because i had to pitch down pretty hard, the engines wouldnt roll back and it started floating and gaining altitude again
also, on an unrelated note, i love flight control replay
funnily enough this is actually my first successful lufthansa flight, literally every single one before this (including this flight) would refuse to work properly, in several different aircraft
really just europe in general i dont land well in, but lufthansa specifically is an issue
just to prove it, im going to do a UPS flight, and i would almost bet money that itll go significantly smoother
ENG 1 INOP
normal max 8 behavior
yea im not really too suprised
it started somehow
this might be a very interesting flight
?
nan
The EFB doesn't fit the Max imo 😭
nan's in the engine
Get her out
i get extremely jealous when i see the ifly max, and then i realize its the ifly max and you get stuff like this 
"All together now!" ahhhh AI
its a public beta
im not complaining
i got it for $30 or something, which is fine to me
they advised it as such as well
i really want to like the inibuilds a320neo, but its just not there
GSX is really fun with it atleast
okay, dont use sim rate with it and tab out
yoyo
the efb on the iFly max for msfs really needs the hybrid system for calculations, can't be bothered to maths conversions between F and C 😆
fr
nvm have to go into the efb "application preferences" page and "set seperate"... roundabout imho
but how to change hPa to inHg for calc ;-;
nvm enter the .
kek
Heh, it updated with navigraph but didnt have any alt/spd restrictions into Atlanta 😂
cloudy ahh
mandatory ping for you
classic plane
thank you so much
@trim harbor would you recommend the max
depends
the max is not a finished aircraft
i've had a few issues along the way
if you know that you're essentially paying for an alpha/beta test - sure
imho it's better than pmdgs' ng , sounds and visual wise
i feel like the early access should be discounted tbh, judging by how very much in beta it is
lesser price, you get it early, but your going to 100% encounter bugs
the bugs arent gamebreaking per se, just a bit annoying
e.g vnav (or lnav) calcs wrong and you have to do extra steps
nothing a good aviator cant do
i got it for $30 so maybe i am biased for the fact i didnt have to pay much
I mean, to be fair, discounted early access has never been a thing
In fact I only know of early access being more expensive than the release
Idk, just my personal 2¢
Every single early access DCS module, Kerbal Space Program, Minecraft
I'm used to early access being discounted
I’d be truly surprised if they did that again, when you consider the costs of basing an aircraft over there, booking the crew hotels for the stay and extra security, it isn’t worth it. Besides, people complain about the new NEO seating after 2 hours let alone 8 hours to America 😂
I’m going to be careful as to what I say here, as I work for them myself, but I have not read of any plans to return to New York and it’s certainly not been mentioned at Leeds which did them before COVID. Don’t think they proved popular enough to bring back afterwards
Ok, we haven’t got any NEOs at Leeds, but we still get info on this stuff
this was months ago lmao
they were in enterprise house and i cant remember what they said
I haven’t opened the chat for months and it just opened me there
Maybe next year, but definitely not this year
And if they are then they’re holding it close to the chest to the point where it’s not even on sale lol
It wouldn't suprise me
most crews I speak to do overnights fairly regularly in cyprus, greece, india, canaries
so costs for hotels wouldn't really be anything more than they pay for anyway
I know LBA want long distance routes through airlines with NEOs like to Dubai and America, and Jet2 have got a deal with Air Transat now for connecting flights in Paris
Yeah, but the crew would be in New York the 4 nights as well and then fly them back
If they did it like they did prior, the aircraft flew out, the aircraft and the crew stayed there for 4 nights, then did the trip home
Something like 3 or 4 nights anyway
They’d definitely have to do it differently, but like I said I have no knowledge of this and I get emails with new routes a month or 2 in advance of public announcements
Saying that, rumours fly around like hot cakes
We were supposedly getting a 757 at Leeds for 2025 but their current final date is January 5th unless something changes
would be nice to see
we don't get them at stansted anymore
its just the titan 321's and 738's
rare to see a neo
Yeah Stansted is mainly leased aircraft isn’t it?
Never been down that neck of the woods or looked into it
We just get 737-800s owned by us and have the last few 300s
757s left here in early 2020 and A321s I don’t know when we’ll see them
you see them coming in with the weird uniforms
We’ll be low on the pecking order
Never seen a Titan crew before
They stopped using the Titan 757 at Leeds before I started
Seen Smartlynx ones before, had an A320 from them in 2019
God I hated that thing
But yeah Jet2 is good, service is great and they won’t just dump you in another country like some other airlines do. New York however, I’ve heard of nothing in terms of going back but if that’s a plan for the future, then fair enough
I know a lot of the 2026 season is finalised already I think, don’t know about being on sale yet
I’m just some unseen ramp agent so what do I know 😂
at least you don't have to deal with stansted ground control
LBA has some good shit because its pretty much just one airline
Leeds is a chaotic hell in summer, way too small for the capacity they try to push
And we had less aircraft in from RyanAir and Wizz than planned thanks to problems on their side. Don’t even want to think how bad it would’ve been with original plans 😂
I only deal with Jet2 of course, but Swissport lads get some right grief
we ran out of space on the ground at stansted this summer
slots meant aircraft had to taxi out to remotes to open the gate for other aircraft
We had a few days like that, couple of aircraft would land some days and sit 30 minutes for a stand
I think the post covid boom has just hit airlines so hard with everyone going away again, airports can’t expand quick enough
we would just taxi out here and sit for hours on end
Stansted is getting a billion pounds investment now isn’t it?
worst one was 2h 30 sat here
just terminal improvements
Jesus Christ
more bus gates
Slots seem to be bad this year for everywhere
Manchester some mornings is apparently really bad
All the war zone diversions innit
atm this is all the bus space we have
its 4 gates
you can only board 2 at a time as well
the new plans will increase it to 10 gates at least
meaning we can actually use the remotes
Our bus drop off is Stand 5, which rarely gets used as a stand
Not that I’m complaining, it’s too small
Can get a 300 on but it’s tight, equipment is a nightmare
for drop of they just dump them here and they walk to passport
I expected Stansted to be a bit bigger for some reason
doesn't help that the people mover keeps breaking
its not small
we just get more traffic than any airport of our size should
Well, bigger in a sense of better set up for the operations
we were built for 7 million a year
How many do you get?
Yeah, that’s not good 😂
Don’t know what Leeds figures are, but they’re getting on with building the extension which will see arrivals. After that, I think departures is getting redone
I mean when stansted expansion is done we will have capacity for 35 roughly
but we are gonna be way past that by the time its finished
10 years they are gonna have to build something new or start refusing flights
leeds is tiny tho
Oh yeah, but Jet2 through peak has about 15, sometimes 16 out in a morning and then 15 or 16 back out in afternoon alone
Which given the size is pretty tight
Wizz didn’t have as much traffic thanks to engine problems
Ryanair didn’t either because of their falling out with Dublin airport
i mean this is me tmrw
insane headways
when there is fog at stansted it can fuck everything up
You guys are still pretty busy this time of year then
We had really bad fog today, well yesterday
all year its like this
Didn’t get an aircraft in until half 11
you get blocks where only out of base aircraft land
buzz, malta air or out of base RUK or DAC aircraft
On Tuesdays and Wednesdays it’s currently 6 back out in afternoon, other 5 stay
fucking hell haha
even up to here we have small headways
yeah
mainly italy and germany
as well as malta ofc
always get a big block of aircraft landing around midnight in the winter
like fucking picadilly circus around that time of night
Our 6 come back between 1 am and 3 am. Another month or so though will be back to flights down by 11 pm
A lot of pressure from the council though about noise pollution past 11 pm but think 737-800s are safe from it
yeah you can tell its been a bad shift always when you see the jet2 crews walking out of the terminal haha
I think they’re brave, doing a 5 hour flight out, 1 hour turn and then straight back to get home at 5 am
No thanks
half the people in stortford work at the airport so they are either used to it or are at work
hour turnarounds are a luxury lmao
There’s a very expensive part of Horsforth/Leeds right at the end of runway 32 so, that goes well
Yeah we get 45, 50 minutes mainly through summer. Better than Ryanairs 35 at Leeds pfff
35? we have 25 at stansted
This time though you usually get an hour at least
Yeah I’ve heard of those, I just think it’s stupid
have the benefit of 40 min in barcelona tmrw
If you asked us to do a 25 minute turn, it’d take 20 to do the unload given how many bags we have
It’s depressing that a 40 minute turn is long to you
Mad
We had a tail swap that led to a 20 minutes turn and it was 160 off and 120 back on
Funnily enough that didn’t happen
nasty
its getting worse now at stansted
we don't get any of the "good" aircraft
so most times they are broken in some way
and we only have 2 standby aircraft available
Same, our fleet is pushed to hell through summer. But given the lack of space more than 2 go on a certain day which has happened, you’re done
We actually had 4 757s come in on standby, well looked after at Manchester and God I missed working on them
ive done 3 days with 4 sectors where we don't have an APU
So much more room to play with
running shit like faro, bari, athens in the summer with those is hellish
Yeah no APU sucks
its common as shit now as well because they get beaten to hell with usage
I’ve only done an airstart twice but last time we needed to load another plane straight away, so that was a rush
And when the pilot looked at me dauntless as hell about hand signals that just added to the pressure
You’re on like 80k a year can’t you just remember them
the summer as well, you get in at what 2-3am due to slots, they get sent to maintenance and have to be out by 550 at the latest to operates flights
the expansion is good tho
we can actually use the remote stands for more than 2 flights at once
We still just use remotes for inbounds, double we ever will for out. Unless they do they get the new terminal that end permitted and built
I had to do a turn at 9 pm this year, very strange for us
Managed to do it in 30 minutes to be told we’d be pushing at 11 pm 💀
Nope, all manual and boy does my back know it
Don’t even have the ones at Leeds with the motors on them
nor do we for the rear
Well, we have 4 but no one has been trained on them yet
Yeah we drive close with rear stairs, then turn away
we had a collision about 2 weeks ago because the water/waste truck drove into the tug pulling the airstairs in
Pull on last few feet
Wasn’t it Stansted where that caterer got taken out by the Ryanair
yeah haha
Preach, some of our guys this year
they don't understand what assistance means
I think it’s a rule that PRM at every airport is useless
They turn up to flights after it should’ve gone 😩
drive up to the plane then sit there on there phones while the crew has to actually do the assistance bit
did helsinki on monday, picked up the aircraft from a crew doing 4 sectors, we still had a charlie onboard who was incapable of walking
assistance was booked
took them 35 min to show up
then when they did they stood at the entrance to the lift and asked us to help them with there luggage
then when that was done we had to carry them to the lift
actually ridiculous how shit they are
That takes some cheek my God
Even ours aren’t that rude although I’ve had to hold my tongue a few times
we don't have a separate crew line at passport control
its assistance/crew
crew take 2 seconds to pass through since its just an ID check
I've had the ABM people push past crew who are queueing up waiting to get out of the airport
thats what takes some cheek
I posted about this in one of my rants in this channel lmao
im trying so hard to make the inibuilds a320neo work, but it just wont
it blows past set altitudes in managed mode for literally 0 reason
its on an ascent profile to cruise, so it just sees the set altitude and blows past it on its way to cruise, does not hold
pressing in the altitude knob sets it into descent mode, because it has to descend to fucking match your set altitude
it was in purple altitude for some reason? that means its following an altitude restriction too, the last one was like 5 waypoints ago at the initial climb
my REALLY bold prediction is that the inibuilds a330 isnt going to be much better than the aerosoft one, unless if the A320 was just a fluke
the NWS with the inib one is INSANE too, its like fucking driving a formula one car, its 1:1 with the rudder control, so you can just jackknife the shit out on turns if you take it too quick
which makes takeoffs in any crosswind borderline impossible, just a tiny bit of steering to try and center it will make your aircraft ping-pong all over the place
nope, it blew past my cruise atltitude too, i had to press the altitude knob again, descended and put my aircraft back into descent mode
its really sad too, i love the FBW but just the basic fact that its the old asobo model, no interior, really does detract from the experience compared to other aircraft
aaaand great, the worst thing possible that could have happened, happened
had to go around, put the throttle into TOGA, no go around
throttle was still auto throttle, even though the display said manual TOGA, still following glideslope and localizer, i had to turn off approach mode manually to start the go around (and even then i dont think it worked)
I find the only issue with the ini 320n is the crz to decent sometimes freaks out and likes to think my descend alt is the new crz alt xD
other than that. its works fine for me
and it did it with fenix too, but was able to work around after resolving it. it was my own skill issue lol
Fenix is probably the only study level aircraft tha I've jumped into and being comfortable with the systems straight away
Still getting used to hand flying it though, as I haven't done much in the game in general since I'm still low on game hours
Need to just load up in some light aircraft and practice
@rocky prism as if to prove my point a crew has been waiting to offload a PRM for 40 min already today
If I was the passengers I'd be giving the airport proper grief
My fenix a320 doesn't work properly, when I tab out the game the plane goes crazy for whatever reason
I got a plane coming off Bremen today
So we will see if it’s the same
Barcelona Cork
Usually not many PRM’s
Are you in the 2x speed perchance?
Because the weird way of how the aircraft interacts with a completely independent external software, the external software does not recognize lag spikes (both regular and caused by tabbing out) or active pause, and when both are over the plane will have phantom turbulence ranging from being brushed off as realistic, to roll and nosedive and unrecoverable
It’s even worse in 2x, because all of a sudden the plane tries to correct the lag spike, over corrects, tries to correct for the over correct, loop and repeat until your literally spinning out of control, quite literally a death wobble
When I tab out, I’ll usually get the cabin pressure vertical speed skyrocketing, to the point where it shoots above 10k in the cabin
I didn't know MAX uses nuclear fusion engines.
What do you mean
Salt Lake is quite... salty today.
boing 737
pretty awesome actually, its just that they take forever to load and have horrible LODs (the same can be said for the rest of GSX stuff though)
performance is pretty good though, obviously takes a little bit of a hit, but once you close the cockpit door they all cull out, so it really doesnt even feel like theyre there
and they load in the external view too, so you dont get a completely hollow cabin
i havent decided if im going to keep it on, adding them in an already extremely performance-heavy aircraft like the fenix does not help whatsoever, but it probably works great in the PMDG boeings
Is DCS too big to fail? Are players misusing DCS? Who is DCS for? Today we dive into this topic.
►Discord: https://discord.gg/enigma89
►Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/enigma89
►Merch: https://enigma-72.creator-spring.com/
Chapters
00:00 Intro
02:15 DCS Weathers the Storm
08:26 DCS Is Dominant
14:15 What DCS Really Is
21:04 DCS Found Its Lane...
@hollow oracle
Is Volanta down or something
Stopped tracking my flight
Shows me in the place where I was quite a while ago
it might be glitched still
unless they fixed it
try restarting volanta
If I restart it, I think the part of the flight will be gone 🥲
it should just eleport u to ur current location
2x sim rate
I’ve had the phantom turbulence before, but only in 2x sim rate does it actually go out of control
I dont think so
Normal speed when I tab out and the game loses focus
Maybe its something to do with the settings in the software
There’s no fix for it
I feel like this video was made to address someone's very specific fear.
Unwarranted that is.
ED is a part of Pentagon supply chain, DCS World is their hobby.
One does get the feeling though something skeevy is going on behind the scenes
normal for government related things actually
Welp, just completed my first transatlantic
BAW239 from Heathrow to Boston
My new longest yet with 5:59 flight time
Real life flight time is around 6:45 usually
This is the second time the fenix has blue screened my PC today
It gets to about 3/4 loaded just fine, and then it completely freezes my PC
yeeeep
You know how many patches they've put out for Afghanistan since they released it 4 months ago? Even single-line bugfixes?
hint: it's less than 1
ed is such a fucking joke
Is it -2?
this is actually terrible lmfao
if you count the fact that performance has gotten worse in the whole sim, which i guess affects afghanistan too, then yes 😉

i cant get over the fact that they're pushing a new map
same principle
while the other one literally hasnt even been touched
yeah, it really comes off as a bit desperate to release this months after releasing another barely-ready map which already had a bunch of criticism
That’s genuinely upsetting
They'll probably announce that next week at this rate 
let me rewrite this
one moment
"Be among the first to be ripped off and see another deserts' diverse terrain and landmark like syria and PG by taking advantage of a special pre-purchase price of $48.99 instead of $69.99 before the official release. Watch the preview video!"
i mean the feature list speaks volumes
"Full Aircraft Compatibility: Compatible with all existing DCS World aircraft modules."
"Multiplayer Support: Full integration with DCS multiplayer for expansive cooperative and competitive play."
if you have to pad your features out with "it works with your planes" and "it works in multiplayer" then something is a bit off






