#Flight Sims (MSFS, P3D, X-Plane, DCS, FS98...)
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
I've looked a little, probably should check them out a bit more.
X plane?
Msfs
did y’all see the winwing airbus fcu
I have X-plane 11 and msfs
Once I tried using my loadcell pedals as makeshift rudder pedals after removing the springs from the brake and that was certainly a not so fun 5 minutes before I quit and went back to using the twist
If I flew Airbus I would have bought it already
Seems like much better value than the miniFCU thingy
defo, I think its properly sized too
Yeah, I think it's worth a look. Can't go wrong with the 16000 either, so much better than the X56 and not much more expensive, but if you want to look at higher end stuff then WinWing or Virpil is the way to go. just avoid the TM Warthog
It's not much cheaper than WinWing and Virpil stuff but it has a terrible mechanism in comparison
If you spend just a bit more you gen an infinitely better product
ah okay interesting, i’ll keep that in mind
I got desk mounts for them too, so they’re not sitting on my desk and blocking my monitor and stuff
That’s the captains pack, it comes with the speed brake and flaps extras
There’s another version that has just the throttles and side stick that’s $200
I tried the A330 on P3D and it needs more than 20FPS for it's FBW to work which is bullshit\
There’s the one freeware A330-900in MSFS that’s really good
not exactly 100% accurate, but it is an A330
https://a330.aerosoft.com/ new lil update
Aerosoft A330 for Microsoft Flight Simulator » Impressive 3D Model ✓ Spot on Flight Dynamics ✓ All Autopilot Modes ✓ Find out now!
fwiw 😅
The TM Warthog is overpriced rubbish. Hated it since the day I got it.

what in the cursed am i seeing
just a normal formation eheh
Aeroshit A330
An AWACS and its escorts 
All Airbus cockpits are the bloody same anyway so it’s probably accurate enough 
Except the A350*
Doesn’t count lmao
U know what I meant
Reject modernity, return to CRTs and steam gauges
A300/A310 then
Early 744 >
There’s also a freeware A330-300 I think
Not sure how it’s in quality, don’t really fly airbuses
Agreed
I wanna install MSFS again for A300 cargo ops
But idk if the inibuilds has the retrofit cockpits or if they went for as delivered
Crt a320 w the old gpws sounds
One can dream tbh
Hell yeah
As delivered
320, 330, 340 the only ones that resemble each other
That’s before even talking about the old CRT display variants
That’s what I meant
the freeware 330 uses the FBW A320 neo cockpit afaik, pretty sure it’s similar to the 330?
Ah well, still will probably try it
330neo
320
330 displays are larger, the console is wider and the outer frame is a different shape
biggest difference is the overhead
Yes
because the systems are quite different
also some of the FBW logic is different, so should be the flight model on the ones in the sim (obviously)
I honestly think they can leave the console alone as long as they do the overhead and FBW
it's similar enough to not be really noticeable, but it would be a nice to have
I don’t think so honestly
Console is just that different
Extra Radios, wider spacing
If you get the 320 console and 330 overhead your gonna run into the issue of the overhead being too big
fair enough. It's probably just me not really caring too much about the modern airbuses so they all look very similar to me
even with the two pictures you sent I have to stare at them for a while to find the differences 😅
Oh yeah
They are very similar
But once you see the differences you can tell the difference
Funnily enough the only reason I know the console is so wide is because for some odd reason BA have a 330 Simulator in there Heathrow training centre
It’s wide as fuck
Has “american” sized seats as well
warbirds i'd say as well, especially the dang Bf 109
it's bad enough having to sit with one leg tensed the whole flight, wouldn't want to have to do it with my wrist
#flightsimulator #justflight #microsoftflightsimulator #msfs #msfs2020
Here's a short video giving you taster of what the outstanding Dukes will have to offer in MSFS. The Turbine and Piston versions will be released in early April and there will also be a bundle package available on release where you can save money when buying both together....
also new AIRAC day
I hate it so much, it looks so good but is a plane I have practically 0 interest in
it's bizarre looking, absolute cone of a plane
and it's not like we're short of cool twin props at this point
idk though, i like Black Square stuff
I really like their TBM and really wish it had the duke's features (most specifically the boris sounds)
I gotta say it looks great
Only I’m pretty much not interested in such stuff at all
Just a kind of plane I don’t think I would fly in MSFS
Would love to fly one in reality. In MSFS? I’ll stick to airliners, because I can
some news about the 29
seems it won't have iff in early access, which is certainly a choice
and this is the early access afghanistan map
RELEASE NOTES 1.37.9.0 If you are playing on PC, outdated packages in your community folder may have an unexpected impact on the title’s performance and behavior. If you suffer from stability issues or long loading times, move your community package(s) to another folder before relaunching the title. How to install a new update safely NEW CONT...
ini neo out
can only hope that they mean it won't get one of the fancier IFF interpretations that, say, Razbam and Aerges are doing at launch, it'll just include the standard base game "simple IFF" mode
but this is ED we're talking about so for all I know they'll launch it without a key feature at launch
Yeah, had a few discussions about this on other discords; it's certainly a choice
probably the side of afghanistan nobody really wanted other than Brits like me (Camp Bastion yay)
dublin
Yay... More desert 
that seems to be a trend
with EA aircraft
i'm inclined to know the reason
or interested rather
it's quite frustrating, especcially for a genuinely BVR capable plane like the 29
ini neo probably
I'd guess FBW for everything but the 3D model
in like 20 years probably
I’m waiting for the Toliss A318 haha
Yeah one is FF/Toliss 350 V2
I think the 2nd one is A330
But I’m not sure
Would be cool to see 332 and 333 in one addon
Their boarding music goes hard tho
This is an Aer Lingus Tribute video
http://www.aerlingus.com/cgi-bin/obel01im1/bookonline/index.jsp
Music
The Merry Ploughboys
http://www.merryploughboys.com/
First Song: The King of the Fairies
Second Song: Jig- The Kesh
Pictures
http://www.airliners.net/
http://www.airplane-pictures.net/
Special thanks to The Merry Ploughboys f...
thats me, i am the merry ploughboy
the merry ploughboys
Nah it’s not, if it weren’t for the static FMS it would be excellent
It’s a single system rather than 2 individual ones
Flight model and just generally could be better tho
The external model is also slightly vexing
the flights i did with it were fine
i agree with your points very much
i also feel li ke theres no ins or whatever
i'd be surprised, the FBW neo has tonnes of cool features
KCLT -> KGSP... I'm amazed that this flight is real, I think it'd legit take longer to go through all the airport security stuff, board the plane, fly the half-hour route and then deboard than it'd take to just drive the 75 miles
Had to test out the new Boris sounds though 😎 so good
Looks like we're getting inibuilds London Luton
They seem to be pretty onpar feature wise, although FBW does have some cool stuff with simbridge
why couldn't ini have done the PW's tho smh
Excited for this
This should be a burned husk
I don't like Luton either but that's a bit far 😉
but yeah, i imagine they modelled it before the fire, and i guess it will probably be rebuilt?
why couldnt ini have done anything but a a320 neo
real
microsoft money tbh
still tho 😭
i imagine they wanted to un-crud the base game one
I imagine the base game one won't make it into FS2024
will be curious to see whether all the existing aircraft do, especially the premium deluxe ones
lin gussy
That staredown though
convoy
Nah they could actually do something quite cool with it
so pissed
i was trying to get this air lingus flight in the air for 4-5 hours now, and only just now did i get to taxiing after bugs
only to find out that runway 28R in dublin was just finished a few months ago, but it hasnt been updated in-game
so im trying to take off from a runway that isnt finished and has no taxiway
heres me trying to figure out why theres no runway
it was finished almost 2 fucking years ago and its still not in-game, you have to be joking
this is like the 4th or 5th time ive had to restart this flight, and not once have i been able to even get onto this damn runway 28R 
The default airports haven't been updated to incorporate layout changes since the launch of the sim
wow
youd think, even just layout changes for major international airports would be worth incorporating
how hard could it even be to slap on a few more runways to a pre-existing airport?
aer lingus is cursed or some shit, almost crashed at takeoff
i think i went too far one direction when steering during takeoff and swerved off the wet runway
||Aer Dingus|| jk
RKSI -> RJAA, probably my smoothest 747 landing yet, remembered to take the height into account this time
hot
Just seen the trailer, it has the KLN90B
that's interesting
great weather to fly in
got out of gatwick relatively stress free 😅
off to tenerife, time to go do human things and hope atc doesn't call me up 
Human or AI ATC
Because over the past few days I’ve been extremely frustrated with the AI ATC 
I play along with the AI one when it tells me to do something reasonable, and I ignore it when it doesn't 😄
It’ll tell me to get to cruising altitude like 20 miles before the runway and I have to constantly hear “please expedite your climb to flight level 310”
yeah that's when you ignore it
I like how it’ll clear you up altitudes realistically though
it was trying to tell me to climb back up to FL370 when I was at an @9000 STAR point
I know, it’s like the plane won’t even let me get that high lmao
Human ATC, Vatsim
my goal for getting back into flight sim was learning how to properly communicate IFR and I just finished my first flight with all ATC
Ground + London centre then full top down canarias control into Tenerife
I haven't tried the ingame ATC, I never did with Xplane either
I'm waiting for beyondatc myself
beyondATC?
some AI atc thing
o
I did briefly look into it, huge scope for a product for a simulator built for entertainment purposes
AI voice though 😔
I remember that before I left the flight sim scene for a while
I'm guessing it never got off the ground
Plane pun
whats P3D like?
performance any better than MSFS? realism about the same?
im realizing that buying a $300 controller for a game that i average 20FPS in might not have been a good idea, im interested in trying out P3D if it means i can have a sort of middle ground between both sims
good performance, middle of the road graphics, and extreme operational realism is what would be ideal for me
You could just turn the graphics down?
P3D to me always seemed like FSX wearing the emperors new clothes
im on like medium graphics and still doing horrible
its a CPU issue more than anything
Not so good. You should get better performance from fsx/p3d, but I wouldnt recommend either of them
it just bothers me that i dont have a flight sim that i can actually fly realistically FPS-wise
MSFS lags so bad for me that the fenix A320 will basically fall out of the sky because autopilot cant function
20 FPS isnt enough for flightsim, no
i just dont know if i should go through the effort pursuing xplane or p3d, both are extremely expensive and i have no idea if itll even have any benefit
i have the aerosoft A3xx packs for FSX, but you need a physical throttle to use them, so i cant even use them, but i get really good FPS in FSX
honestly id be interested in getting the aerosoft stuff in FSX working, but i cant figure out how tf vjoy and stuff works
itll only respond to a throttle axis and not the buttons, so i need to find a way to create an axis thatll get progressively moved up/down with button presses, like how its done in MSFS
its not even like i need precise throttle control when flying a civil airliner anyway, you literally only need it to set it to autothrottle and then turn it off at landing
like, i have nothing against flying FSX, its not as clean as MSFS but as long as its as realistic im fine with it, its literally just the single issue of that throttle thats stopping me
i cant believe that im the only person having this issue, when i try to search it on google my reddit post from a few hours ago is the only to come up
Here is a solution for those who prefer to use the keyboard for throttle control. No need to purchase a hardware joystick/throttle if you don't have one! Note that this solution will require you to download, install and configure a few pieces of free software (see Download and Install the followi...
theres this, but i cant make sense of it, and it seems like the one file to get it to work isn’t available anymore
its an alright sim, but you need to post a bunch of money into scenery & aircraft
scenery that is pretty much outdated & doesn't get updates anymore
XP11 is worth a shot, give the demo and the zibo a go and see how it performs
I wouldn't bother with p3d if you're new to it
But xp is worth a shot, what is your spec btw?
Depends
12 has very odd hardware requirements and can run like ass on a very good system
11 has more stuff and runs better but is limited with a lack of weather systems
Graphics on Both are good as is the amount of freeware stuff
Comparing them to P3D would be a mistake tho
P3D is old, doesn’t really work well and is a very easy sim to brick
It costs about 50% more than any addons for anything else
fsx is not too bad if you don't mind the 2006 graphics
but the flight model definitely feels more on rails-y even compared with msfs
I'd personally give Xplane11 a shot (and in fact I did), and it' s good enough
snowy
AMD RX 570 8GB
16GB RAM (8x2)
Intel i5-6400 3.3GHz*
HP 2B47 Motherboard
2TB HDD + 500GB HDD
Windows 10 Home Edition
*Rated for 2.7, but idles around 3.0
the only thing in hesitant with on with xplane is that the only A320 worth getting is $80
lol no
the a320 is super damn mid
get toliss a319, a320 neo, 321 neo and norm
those r good
toliss 346 is also nice
flyjsim q400 is nice as well
felis 747 is amazing
i mean, thats not any better really, $70
i think i just really need to suck it up in MSFS honestly
quality wise, it is
yeah
the toliss comes in a very close second to the FSLabs for 320 family aircraft
wdym?
Yeah, your spec I don't think will run XP any better, best rather than spending money on more software to just save up for hardware
Performance I believe they are asking? I get 40 - 60 Fps with everything pretty high on xp12
In this video we go through some more updates on the 757. Keep in mind the VC textures are just placeholders. WIP

flew the sparky into kennedy from heathrow and forgot about CTAF 😭
crisis averted, i get like 30-38FPS in the FBW A320
the fenix one gives me like 20 from the external software running and everything
i did invest in the latinVFR airbusses too, because theres that horizon simulations mod that bases their systems off of the FBW A320neo
so i should be able to fly an A321/A320/A319 proper with the FBW A320neo performance
i managed to complete like 5-6 flights using the fenix A320 too, so im really bitching over nothing, next week ill be flying it again with no issues, its just my brain wants to hyperfixate on performance
One of the biggest favours any flightsimmer can do themselves is to turn off the FPS display. Does it feel and look smooth to handfly? If yes its fine
thats another thing, i get trapped staring at the FPS than i do actuallyplaying the game
the latinvfr airbusses are mid
good middle detail option for an a320ceo i guess, the internals are all based on the FBW A320 so it has some good realism atleast
its also the only real option for A318/A319/A321s too, so in that regard its pretty good atleast
https://stormbirds.blog/2024/03/24/eagle-dynamics-clarifies-mig-29-plans/ it's been clarified that it'll have a basic iff at launch
thank god
I used to fly BA Virtual many years ago
BA Landor and the Speedbird logo are some of the best pieces of the design in history
There isn't a plane on which it looks bad, also a thing me and a friend of mine noticed is that they adjusted the tail slightly to make it fit very nicely with the Trident and the L-1011
the way they modified it so that it properly follows the aicraft's lines is just amazing
oh man don't even get me started
the UK had some of the best graphic designers of the 20th century
Glasgow Airport, BR, BA Negus/Landor, Barbican Centre
Funnily enough the livery that the Italian railway used up until the late 2000s (and early 2010s) was made by a UK firm in the early 90s
yeah the old FS logo doesn't really do it for me tho
I like it
but eh
Looks really cool on the Turin water tower
oh man
I might make Baghdad in under 4h
good luck 😄
pretty golden hour
UPS decided to wait 6 extra hours to deliver it, but its finally here
if your looking at buying it, absolutely buy atleast the throttle, because the throttle on the joystick is completely useless
it has no detents, but includes a space for reverse thrust, so you could just go to idle and accidentally slip into reverse
the physical throttle has the proper springloaded locks that stop you from going straight into reverse
Nice mousepad 
How does the throttle feel in hand, well built or kinda cheapish? As far as cheap plastics would go anyway? One gripe I had about the TWCS was that it felt too light and bc of that felt sorta cheap idk
tokyo
Ngl wanna buy the thing so much
Only issue, I don’t actually fly airbuses
I sold my old, janky TM stick and bought the VKB Sim Gladiator. Wouldn't ever want to go back, Thrustmaster is proper trash. Though the Airbus throttle quadrant at least looks nice.
New 146 update should be out next week with the new FMC, Cabin and other fixes
https://community.justflight.com/topic/3387/update-change-logs-v0-1-10-released-edited-26-3-24
v0.2.0 (pending release) New custom-coded UNS-1 FMS: Unique interface based on the real world UNS-1 FMS Manoeuvres including Holding Patterns (HLD), Direct...
@echo gorge
Idk if I’d say trash, they’re pretty decent quality for lower end gear at the price
Their simracing gear is pretty solid, the belt driven stuff is still better than the plastic gear driven crap that Logitech puts out and afaik there isn’t another flight stick on the market at the same price range
Their main strength is the availability and price. You can walk into most electronics stores and find their gear there. E.g. you could buy their Airbus stick for 50 bucks right now on sale.
But to be honest, the difference between TM entry grade gear and one "tier" up (e.g. VKB for flight sims or Monza/Fanatec for sim racing) is worlds apart. I'd much rather spend a bit more and buy the better gear nowadays. Not only will it last longer (lower price means corners cut when it comes to quality) but the experience is way better.
Awesome
Anyone here use FSRealistic? Its on sale on just flight and was wondering if its any good
i like using it
it's a must have just for the headshake im
o
the sounds it has are nice as well
annoying how headshake isnt auto built into msfs, thats sorta my reasoning for wanting it
now this cool af
Just for MSFS?
Yes
Fucks sake
Just Flight has said multiple times on their forum that they have more or less shifted all their efforts to MSFS, because that's the bigges and most profitable market by a wide margin
interesting livery lol\
350 landing next to me \
There’s an A350 in msfs?
no
Ah, understandable
accepted
yes correct
haha

interesting parking position
done fuck all with flight sims recently
85AN 
Itami moment
the waffle house of the sky
cute
#msfs #flightsimulator #justflight #msfs2020 #146
Here's the first of two more videos ahead of this substantial update for the 146 Professional for Microsoft Flight Simulator which will be made available w/c 1st April and it will be free of charge to all owners of the 146 Professional MSFS.
The purpose of this video is to highlight some of ...
Full GSX support is an unexpected bonus
DCS Afghanistan is coming. So while the entire map is not available at release, it will eventually become available, so until then we will have to entertain ourselves.
►Discord: https://discord.gg/enigma89
►Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/enigma89
►Merch: https://enigma-72.creator-spring.com/
Outro Music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZoF...
how flyable is it
Dear pilots, DCS: Afghanistan is now available for pre-order!
20 years of the War on Terror and the Soviet operations of the 1980s place Afghanistan as one of the most important combat theatres of the past half century. Few war zones have ever seen more A-10C, AH-64D, F-16C, F/A-18C, CH-47F, Mi-24P, Mi-8MTV2, and Su-25 sorties than this. The en...
ngl it looks nice
it'll be worth it just because afghanistan imo
it's the standard price for terrain so meh
Yea buy the whole HD map or you can have a basic map with HD sections. Reminds me of MFS
Thats not even a Heavy gate 
Very, had no issues with it at all today
🧡 EZY
weather was windy today so blame it on that
i've been thinking of flying it again
i'll give it a shot
i still struggle w keeping speed @ cruise though
it has no athr and i have no clue what the right thorttle pos is
it has an acceleration/deceleration guide on the speed tape
you just adjust the throttle until that guide disappears
and check it every so often
🐳
Is that xplane?
I want a beluga in MSFS so bad 
There were quite a few planes I couldn't wait for in MSFS, so I got Xplane 
And now there are a few planes I really like but only exist for P3D/FSX.
Trident, BAC 1-11, and most importantly L-1011
At least the Mercure is coming for MSFS
Tokyo is so beautiful on a 34R departure
Anyone tried this PC12 ?https://simworksstudios.com/pc12-legacy-msfs.html
Yep, it's pretty good
It's about to get a fairly decent update alongside SU15 as well
EGGW (because why wouldn't I buy another inibuilds airport) -> EGAA
yeah, it's quite decent. That said I didn't end up enjoying it as much as I hoped, can't point to any specific issue and maybe it was just overhyped
I think it just came into a flooded market, what with the TBM 850 and M500 having come out just beforehand
Chances of a decent PC12 for XP are slim, so going to get that one.
CowanSim has put out an R-22, that's my weekend sorted
Just recreated my first (and so far only) real helicopter lesson
v1.1.0 of the iniBuilds A300-600R Airliner for MSFS has been released. This update adds the anticipated PW engine variant, the IDC radio panel and adds a few features as well as fixes many bugs! This update can be downloaded via the iniManager.v1.1.0New Features Added – IDC modern radio panel wit...
Getting ready for the short hop from Hamburg to Bremen 😄
I can't say my experience with the A300 is any better post-patch than it has been before.
I dunno if they've messed up the fuel consumption but I followed the figures Simbrief gave me and it ran out of fuel about 2 miles from the end of the runway I was trying to land on.
That or the simbrief fuel loading is borked.
that's uh, not great
the one in msfs?
That’s just par for the course when it comes to inibuilds it seems
The autopilot just does what it wants, fuel calculations are all wrong
I can’t install MSFS on my laptop, the installer crashes at random points and then restarts progress completely
I think the A300 is genuinely the buggiest MSFS product I've flown so far honestly. Not really expecting their A380 to be a great experience.
lmao, take two in the A300, I deleted a hold from the FMS and it locked up the whole aircraft, nothing responding, etc
Could only hand fly it with no instruments working
If you're still on the fence about buying it... avoid, avoid, avoid.
Rip
I just hope they fix the thing
Me too, I legit think it's a really nice aircraft with great modelling, sounds, etc, it's just buggy to the point of being unable to complete short flights in 2 out of 2 attempts now.
If they can fix that it'll be top notch
Eh. I'd just wait for the A300B4
Hopefully they release it before the heath death of the universe
its really convenient that its "boeing", because thats the sound they make when they collide with the ground after nosediving from the MCAS system
lmfao
Is that a functional BCF or just a repaint of the normal 800?
looks like PMDG's
The PMDG 800 has a functional BCF variant, as well as a BDSF and BBJ2
It’s a proper BCF
The default B738 freight liveries are all European though, I didn’t realize until I took off that I was flying one operated by west Atlantic
The cargo doors and everything opens, with a proper pallet loader and everything, but it’s not animated and the inside always shows up as loaded
Couple of screenshots from the flights I did during a very lazy Easter weekend. I also just installed FSLTL, which is fantastic.
CYYZ -> KMSP
Yeah, it's really nice to see real world traffic flying about
I've started flying with A Pilot's Life 2, really makes you fly to airports you might not have considered before
wakkanai is a nice landing during sunset
That gotta be both quite fun and challenging
Introducing some variation might work well for me…
- Boston to JFK (or back)
- LA to San Francisco (or back)
- LA to San Diego (or back)
- St. Petersburg to Moscow (no back, only wanna go away from that city)
It's given me as my schedule...
KMSP -> CYYZ and back
KMSP -> KPIT and back
KMSP -> KSTL and back
KMSP -> KCVG and back
KMSP -> KJFK and back
I bought the CRJ type rating (ingame currency) and got offered a virtual job at Endeavor
you get rated on your flying too, the better you fly the more XP you earn and the higher your pilot rating (averaged over the last 20 flights iirc?) gets
a high pilot rating means better job offers
I got something like 93/100 on the first flight (lost 7 points due to uncomfortable bank angle because I forgot to turn on half-bank) and 100/100 on the second one today
I’d get 50 at most
It's not too hard honestly, just average airline things
What’s wrong with 30° bank angle though
passengers/cargo don't enjoy it
Well I don’t ask them to 
here's the full list
it's mostly just procedural stuff like remembering when to turn lights on and off
But honestly I pretty much never set bank angle, it’s on 30 by default in the 737 and I just keep it there
you're allowed up to 35 i think
yeah
the CRJ will happily exceed that if you let it though
No idea when to turn lights
Guess I haven’t played MSFS enough yet to truly know this stuff
i honestly don't know where i learned it
general forum reading and youtube i guess
the operator's manuals for each aircraft (the real ones) are usually good sources of info too, the A320 one was an interesting read
The DHL one is american
Iaero iirc
I think all of fedex's BCFs are opf european airlines yeah, I was interested in it for shandong airlines who have a couple (?) BCFs running between Qingdao and Centrair
shame about the lack of animations though
did a repaint of one for an ATC4 scenario a while ago, looks so out of place next to everything else on their cargo ramp
nah fucking hell, definitely will be taking some time off work to get MSFS running again
oh fuck sakes, can't post the RSR sticker
oh well

I love those small Japanese regional airports. And the best thing is, they´re incredibly well done AND free. 😄
FSLTL is really good. During my last start-up at EDDF I spent a couple of minutes watching traffic. Very moody, especially as it got dark.
A Pilots Life 2 sounds interesting, I might give it a look. Currently I mostly fly in Central Europe and Japan because I own more airport DLCs there. But some variation might be neat.
Really? I feel like most flights I've taken used 30° bank and I never felt anything wrong or uncomfortable?
Ah, +/-35 sounds more reasonable
Yeah, I got the limit wrong initially
Sorry, I probably should read all the messages before writing 😅
I forgot how fun it is to install MSFS
Feel for people who bought it on cd
Those poor poor souls
KTCM -> KSUU. Not bad at all for freeware.
does it have a working fmc
Partially!
oh shit yo
It's got custom logic, it's not fully done yet but the autopilot works
i've been waiting for a military transporter that can fly a-b
The sounds are very, very loud though, hope they fix that
https://azurpolygroup.com/c-160-transall/
This is arguably "better" though of course has much less range
oh ye i like the transall fors ure
but i'd love me a c17/c5 more
what i really crave for is a e-3 tho
yum
i too like flying in circles for hours
oh i prefer more exclusive airbases for that sort of thing 😎
That's another roundtrip i need to keep working on, currently got as far as Keflavik with it
going on a tour of places they've visited IRL
Norway is the next one, they recently stopped there for a hot refuel
Followed by Fairford, then Diego Garcia, Guam, Hawaii and back home again I think
c-17 my beloved
the only good boeing product
youll never understand the true scale of them until your under the engines of one, the vertical stabilizer has to be almost 4-5 stories tall
Banned
anything you could think of fitting inside will fit inside, its no joke that they can transport full size helicopters in them, with room to spare
727 is 
C-17's a MD design anyway, the only truly MD design in their existence in fact
thats why its the best boeing product, its not even boeing
the MD-11 is my second favorite boeing product, but that doesnt even count as boeing because it literally has mcdonell douglas in the name
the warning sounds in the MD-11 are just 
Well it's a DC design anyway not even a truly MD plane
Here are the Alarms, T-CAS (Traffic Collision Avoidance System) and GPWS (Ground Proximity Warning System) of the MD-11.
Website : http://aeroliners.wordpress.com/
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/aerolinershd
Instagram : @aerolinershd (https://instagram.com/aerolinershd/)
Don't hesitate to leave a comment.
Subscribe to watch ...
Just casually forgetting the existence of the 747
yes, because the A380 is just better in every way
Excuse me
How
Those same A380s that are now being retired and scrapped because they have no second purpose?
The same A380s that were more than late to the punch and too big to fit in most places, with zero plan for what they’d be used for post passenger service?
Lol
I like the A380 but
Saying the 747 wasn’t a good Boeing product is certainly an opinion
i mean, there is no good (true) boeing product
NGC keeps forgetting god's gift to mankind, the one and only 7 2 7
Every day we stray further from its perfection
The 727 is cool, but in my eyes it’ll never be as cool as this 
Fair, wrong but fair
Thems fightin words
You take that back!!
While I'm not the one to dispute the 727's qualities, When we speak of absolute perfection, have you considered this?
what actually happend to him
he died
the store removed his stuff
actually died?
yeah, he was one of the first people to start working on XP addons
Something is going down in DCS land.
Details are still a bit hazy but it sounds like ED hasn't been paying third parties.
And they've just pushed the patch back by a week because third parties have apparently downed tools to some extent.
Uh oh, hope it all ends up being nothing
Source to that?
Can you send me a message link?
It's a little tricky to point to anything concrete, but this seems to sum it up - the guy who reacted is a Razbam dev: #544231925263630336 message
I was under the impression that ED were doing well financially, but given how often they have sales, maybe not. I can't imagine any other reason why they wouldn't pay up.
Never seen the community this "turbulent" though, and the devs aren't rushing to deny anything either.
I still fly his L1011
I managed to get it in shady ways recently, and it's not too bad
I'd love to get the CS 1011 for FSX, but it's 40$ 
3rd parties never pay ED where you get that info?
More than likely a bug cant be fixed so they push the patch back
@untold finch and that info given is most likely 100% wrong
Nobody knows
What? No, ED pay the third parties, or are supposed to be.
No they dont
So when a third party module is sold on the DCS e-Store, who gets the money?
If I buy a Razbam aircraft through the Eagle Dyanmics store, Eagle Dyanmics takes all of my money. and then should give a percentage to Razbam
just like it works with Youtube
and everything else
Other way around 3rd party gets the profit ED get percent
Right, but when you buy it from ED's webstore, the money goes into ED's bank account.
Not if I go through the Eagle Dynamics store, my payments go to Eagle Dyanmics
They then need to send the money to the third party dev.
Which, if the rumours are true, they have not been doing
Most likely ED only get a small percent of any 3rd party profit otherwise 3rd parties would be pointless, Thats why id say heatblur sell there products on there own site taking 100% per sell?
From what I know, they have to send some of that money to ED
As per their contract agreement
Yea small amount most likely who knows how much
I recently bought the F-86 made by third party developer Belsimtek, and according to paypal my payment went to Eagle Dynamics SA
Rumours in dcs community are always blown out of perportion
Belsimtek is ED now
well, it's time to go back to when I bought the MiG-21 then
or the Mirage2000
They're a weird edge case, they were originally ED, split off into a third party, and then re-merged
@reef isle belsimtek is now ED company
We don't really know the details of percentages, but if ED has not been sending third parties the money owed, then that's very bad
They did the F-86, MiG-15, F-5E, Mi-8, iirc
Yea correct
No
That was leatherneck until M3 and HB split
He's saying the payment went to Eagle Dynamics
because all payments for DCS modules go to Eagle Dynamics unless you buy it from, say, Heatblur's website
I dunno how it works
or Steam, in which case it goes to Valve first
Yes
Payment for the Tomcat went to Eagle Dynamics SA
Payment for the MB339 went to Eagle Dynamics SA
Then maybe ED pays them the profit i dunno
yeah that's what we were saying
Im not there accountant
Right, which is the point - if they haven't been doing that, which it sounds awfully like what Razbam have been hinting at, then there's a problem
I just wouldnt believe everything thats read 🙂
after they get all of my money, they should give a certain percentage of that money to the third party dev
Why would Razbam staff lie though
Either way, we'll see in their "official statement" later
Several members of the Razbam dev team
It's entirely possible that it's all a nothingburger, but quite often there's no smoke without a fire, and they seem really quite aggrieved
Id say a dispute nothingburger
I really hope the razbam folks are wrong but it's a pretty heavy accusation to make and I doubt they'd make it up
Tomcaaaaaaaaaat 😄
i think i accidentally killed flight sims for me
i was like big dick swinging, i was extremely confident on how to do an ILS landing and everything
and then i found out about VOR landings, and i feel crushed
i get the concept, but in practice i have no idea how to get the plane to do the concept
the only way i can describe it is as crushed, i feel like im a fraud and i had misplaced confidence in my abilities
rip
MSFS or DCS?
If your plane is able to create a VNAV path:
Descent in LNAV/VNAV until you can see the runway, or the MDA/MAPt, then disconnect the A/P and land manually, prepare to need to make larger corrections than with an ILS, if the weather is good, you can disconnect the autopilot earlier to make your life easier.
If your plane can't do VNAV path, but can fly with at a certain flight path angle (FPA):
Set VOR freq and course, capture the VOR radial/course using VOR/LOC mode, then, using the charts start descending with the correct flight path angle at the correct point.
If your plane can't fly a precise FPA:
Set VOR frequency and course, capture the VOR radial/course using VOR/LOC, fully configure the aircraft for landing before starting to descend, note your ground speed, and using the chart start descending at the correct Vertical Speed at the right distance. Round the vertical speed down to compensate for the time it takes the aircraft to start descending. When you see the runway you can only proceed with the landing if you see the runway early enough, and from a position where you can manoeuvre the aircraft to make a safe landing
Other visual approaches, like this one in Florence are just meant to get you close enough to the airport, once you have the airport in sight it essentially becomes a visual approach, you're free to manoeuvre in any way you see fit to make a safe landing
And, for the United States only, if you are cleared to a VOR approach, and you need to make a turn larger than 90 degrees to intercept the final approach course you need to do the procedure turn, so you overfly, fly outbound and turn around as described in the chart.
I really need a video tutorial or something, I appreciate you typing that all out, but I really need a visual guide that I can rewatch and take notes on
Fair enough, no problem, when I first started to write it I thought it would have been simpler and easier 😅 then I always thought of another thing to add ahah
It seems like no approach is the same either, they’re all extremely different
Some have full curves, some are just simple courses direct to the runway, some have you cross over the airport and loop back in
I think what really gets me is the curves, like, how do I know im following the curve correctly?
What’s the deal with that compass VOR thing with the blue lines that I see people using too?
Can you send an example or a timestamp of a video?
MSFS, the Tomcat got a new update that I wanted to try
There's a bunch of good tutorials on YouTube aimed at irl student pilots
Also (because I'm evil) vors are nothing, wait till you get an ndb approach 
Though I don't know of any 737 airports restricted to just that
Cheers! How do you like it? Worth getting? I'm currently in the mood for a military jet and the F-14 looks very tempting, though the Tornado might be a bit more interesting to me for personal reasons.
It is definitely in the highest tier of fidelity for MSFS military stuff, alongside the Vulcan and perhaps the BAe Hawk. The Jester implementation is cool, I think it was ported quite smartly. The main downside is that the flight model is a lot tamer than the DCS one, feels more "on rails" because that's just how MSFS internal flight models are I guess.
It looks great (honestly, a bit better than it does in DCS, due to the better graphics engine) and sounds great too.
I mainly just whizz about California and Nevada in it but I'm sure it'd be cool to fly elsewhere too.
Hawk is OK - I don't think it's much better than the IFE MB339, but it's a lot more expensive
The flight model is a bit strange
Thanks for your detailed impression! That's what I heard about it, too. It apparantly lacks a certain fidelity which in turn take away some of the challenges of flying the F-14 in real life. That's a bit of a shame and I wonder if the Tornado will have the same issues. On the other hand, if the systems are well made and it sounds and looks nice certain weaknesses in the flight model can be overlooked, I guess.
Yeah, that's my one complaint too. Otherwise I really like it. The MB-339 is something I haven't touched in aaaages, shall have to revisit it.
does it make me childish that this made me laugh?
7up
like the drink
I'll show myself out....
146 update is out
so nice to fly man
Here's Razbam's statement on their DCS modules.
Really does sound like they're not being paid.
Yeah, that really doesn't look good
I missed this message but there is an interesting fact about that hawk, its the same as the XP11 one just ported over with new textures. Here comes the fun part, JF ported over the weapons as well because they can but the weapons were from the actual sim not the addon so they had no right to do so. I think that basically sums up how cheap the MSFS port is
It was taken down very quickly as soon as they noticed from what I heard and reuploaded with there own weapons
the JF also comes with its own missiles, bombs and tanks as well its quite funny to think that they just copied the wrong 3d assets lmao
I do like that hawk tbh tho
fun to fly with TE GB
its just nice
mil training jet so easy to fly and fly well
its well worth picking up for XP if you can get it cheap
Oh, I already have it in MSFS, and it sounds like it's the same thing?
I do own XP11 but I haven't got it installed because MSFS has eaten all my disk space 
Quick question about the JF's 146, is there any difference between the one sold on the website and the one on marketplace?
I think the marketplace one just takes longer to update. I don't think there are any other differences?
The DCS discord community is figuratively ablaze right now, I am in awe of the magnitude of this
That's good. I can wait in case what
Butter in Basel
AFAIK only update speed
Nice
So happy I can finally do this, thanks Just Flight ❤️
need to play oxygene https://youtu.be/kSIMVnPA994?si=0RwRr7T-cZibMVne
Jean-Michel Jarre - Oxygene, Pt. 4
Jean-Michel Jarre “Welcome to the Other Side”: https://jmj.lnk.to/WTTOS
Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/user/jeanmicheljarre?sub_confirmation=1
More from Jean-Michel Jarre:
All music videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFGVI0_UiNs&list=PLK01Sue00sHLumpHNSYHDLwzy7wMZRPof
Jean-Michel Jarre with Hans ...
Great read
Worse, no mig23
man
the BAe 146 update is not good for me
it's screwed the simbrief payload integration completely
Though honestly even worse is (if true) razbam not getting the payment they're due
i've just spent the last hour trying to get it to load any actual payload
first the A300 gets fucked now this
honestly the just flight EFB is not great
time to break out ol reliable
This. For the costumers, it might mean no new digital planes to fly with, for the devs it means (if true), no income and a big financial mess potentially from essentially working for free . I thought about going back into DCS for a while but now I don´t feel like spending money on that game. Too shady right now.
One of the razbam devs posted saying hes quit dcs completely not sure on the date of the message trying to find out, Looks like ED have shoved there own statement out to get back at razbam
F15E will end up like the hawk
Well only way to use it would be to roll back patches
On today’s episode of “just pay people properly please thanks”
No. ED Made contracts so that this won't happen. F15E is ED's property if RB abandons it
Another module added to the 2 years without a patch problem!
Wooo
I doubt ED will prioritze the F15E at all for a while
They got plenty of stuff to work on beforehand
Like the goddamn supercarrier
I have absolutely zero faith in ED's ability to maintain the Strike Eagle
I mean the radar is already leagues ahead of anything ED's managed to put together, they'd need to hire someone who could actually figure out how it works
Its not like i dont have faith
But dcs should fix up their damn basic systems first before maintaining other modules
AI, SC, Campaign is all more important
It's fine for me
Noooooo, Mirage 2000 is my favourite jet in DCS 😦
I'm going to think about backing up the current DCS version in case they screw it up in future updates
yeah, i realised it was probably user error this morning
yesterday was definitely not the day to fly anything complex for me, think i was on coffee #5 by that point
Fair, we all have those days
Speaking of Simbrief, how do you actually load flight plans into the 146 FMC? I tested it during lunch break and failed, too.
You have to export it to another folder in another format
Hi , I have just updated the 146 , A couple of things as its been a while since i have used this add on , C:\UsersUSERNAME\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft...
simbrief downloader can automatically handle it for you
Ah, ok, thanks. I hoped there'd be a more convenient way like in the Fenix or the A300 where you can link the plane to your Simbrief account.
Sadly not, that only populates the EFB as far as I can see
It was the Super Tucano all along.
A nothingburger then
If that's what you're taking from this then I'm quite surprised
It sounds awfully like ED are trying to coerce Razbam and are using their money as leverage to do so
Money that may or may not have already been spent on Nick Grey's warbird collection
Who knows not my problem but ill be very cautious with parting with my money into dcs be it ED or 3rd party
100% same here. I was going to buy the Kiowa, the Chinook, maybe Kola, etc. Now? I'm really, really hesitant.
And that's a shame because I'm sure the devs have put their love, sweat, tears, etc into these modules. I just don't want to take on the risk that they'll not even make it a full year before becoming abandonware.
Poor Enigma servers ;-;
Yeah, that's fair imo. You've got to draw the line somewhere for an initial release, otherwise scope creep will just keep pushing that release back.
cba to fly tonight but had some fun doing some volanta admin, getting aircraft screenshots sorted
Someone else that doesn't use real images for Volanta
❤️
I don't get why people do that personally! You literally have a tool that lets you photograph the aircraft when/where/however you want but you'd rather take a photo from airliners.net? Fair enough I guess, not my thing though
Millions of peaches, peaches for me, millions of peaches, peaches for free
holding up with a su25 really was a challenge lool
Doing some Air Serbia ops on APL2, using one of their GetJet leases.
LYBE -> LGAV
RIP
If you want to know why I'm holding short there this is how it went
TWR: DLH918 ready for immediate crossing?
DLH918: Affirm
TWR: 918 clear to cross 10
...
TWR:DLH918, are you able to hold position?
how do you do descend w the bae
do you calculate it yourself or is there a t/d of some sort
there is now
Recently got back into flight sims by getting MSFS in the spring sale, I still have to learn a few things here and there in the new sim but otherwise it's going good (well, apart from my current lack of free time and proper equipment :p)
LYBE -> LEBL tonight. Barcelona is wild, crazy busy.
Perfect heli weather right?
Those two were my previous hover attempts 😆
Gave me a hankering to take this for a run
Hawgs! ❤️
All the nippons
Back from LEBL -> LYBE.
Vinyls?
Mine still haven't turned up yet
I have a funny feeling they're stuck in customs or something but i've had no notice to say that they have been
tshirt and vinyls ya
i didnt even get a tracking link or anything
it just showed up at my doorstep lol
Don't feel like you have to answer, but are you in the UK?
nah germany
ah, ok
i was worried it wouldnt show up at all tbf, the first folks started getting it two months ago
iirc the heatblur team are posting them by hand by themselves so it's probably why it's taking so long
idk why it's so slow 
the first folks who started getting stuff didn't order the vinyls
ahhhh
there was some delay with those specifically, apparently
weird
just got to figure out a place to display mine now 😄
hopefully they arrive this week
yea i agree
tbf for that they should like send u an email saying 'it's shipped' atleast
it's quite irretating
plen
It’s kind of fucked up that southwest is the only other airline to offer island hop flights in Hawaii
The yeehaw, budget, Boeing-only airline
Hawaiian does island hops too, but in ancient 717s, and I think 1 with A321s
should I do this during the CTP? 🤪
I'm tempted... but I guess the controllers are not going to be happy, especially because I'm going to have a mach 0.7 Vne, so separation from traffic could be interesting
Seems like a bold choice
Yeah I'll probably not do it, but I'll think about it
Updates for both Ini's KLAX and A300-600R just dropped together 😎 don't mind if I do
seems like they've fixed the things I complained about
One thing I like doing is looking up where a livery is based in real life then flying from there. This is Northwind Aviation's Bell 206 JetRanger that I've taken from their Chelan WA base to somewhere also in WA.
That thing looks like awesome fun
Its actually really good haha
quite difficult to fly because its so insanely responsive but my word
on a visual with a final speed of 60kts
once you get the hang of it its so much fun
especially with those massive tundra tyres
who made the twotter for xp
RW Design
It's not amazing but once you can fly it it is really fun
Comes with both short and long nose versions with or without G1000's then Tundra, Std, Ski's and Floats
so you get pretty much everything
Back to LYBE from LSZH. Just Copenhagen and Amsterdam left on the schedule.
Didn’t know 737s had the visor
yep, it's not fitted to all of them i think but it's in the pmdg options
wish there were an easier way of figuring out what registrations have what equipment IRL
I find it pretty cool in VR
100%
AFAIK, the reskins in the PMDG operations center should have everything properly equipped
Aye, if they have the "validated" tag iirc. Skins from fs.to are a mixed bag here though.
hell yeee
I’ll never get used to the fighter pilot HUDs in 737s, it’s like, wtf is a southwest plane gonna shoot down
Is this a serious comment, or am I just not getting humor?
im being funny by comparing it to a figher pilot HUD
EGAR - SFAL - SUMU - SBRJ - SBSV - SBFN - GVAC - LEZL - EGTK
twotter flight back from Antarctica to the UK
really tempting me man haha
Flight sims are the worst
Because it’s like, you think you know everything, and then you get humbled SO BAD on an aircraft you thought you knew extremely well, and you feel like giving up on flight sims entirely
For me it was VOR landings, and now it’s missed approaches
They don’t make any sense, and I haven’t gotten any help from anybody on how to do either
Tutorials don’t really help because each flight is significantly different
This is heathrow 09L missed app, so the altitude you should set is 3000 on final so if you do need to go around then fly runway heading until at alt 1580ft or until DME 0.0, when both are achieved then turn left hdg 036 until ATC advises otherwise or if no ATC is online then verctor yourself back around
for this app you should hold with this pattern over the chiltern VOR or just vector back around towards the ILS again
Its always proc to set the missed app alt with the runway hdg as soon as your on the ILS or app
EDDF 07L app with a full missed approach route and instructions
Missed app alt is 5000ft and hdg is 066
charts are all you really need
they will give you all the info and if that isn't enough then just revector yourself
New week, new airline. Said goodbye to Air Serbia ops and hello to some European cargo work with ASL Belgium...
What was confusing me the most was the VOR stuff, but I watched a tutorial a few times over and I have a pretty good understanding of how that works now
I’m still a bit confused with a few VOR and RNAV approaches in the A320, but I do have a solid understanding of VOR flying now
new Fenix update is out, and the A319/A321 expansion is looking imminent - £40 for the expansion including both is pretty good
Oh nice. The releaese of the expansion would be sooner than I expected. Can't wait, tbh.
Yeah, it really opens up a lot of routes.
@shadow burrow

