#off-topic-tech
1 messages · Page 112 of 1
Sounds like another thing to pay for tho
Looks like there is a router infront of that one
yeah gotta port forward on that
Nah, lot of DHCP servers now use hash of the MAC address to give the lease.
And if there aren't hash collisions, every device then gets "static" IP.
Setting that actual static lease just makes it certain.
Depends in the implementation I guess.
But yeah, most home router dhcp's basically soft-reserve an ip until the pool runs out
Nah, old way was to give IPs sequentially based on what was free.
And now most devices use DHCP server configs that do that hash based on MAC to give out the IP, and you can see that from how the IPs are all over the IP range the DHCP server uses.
And only if there is collision, then you don't always get same one.
No soft-reserve, no tracking when the lease isn't active, but via deterministic calculated IP lease from the MAC.
(except when the calculation has collision with another active lease)
Same result, but no need to save anything in permanent memory and still get same one even after router resets etc.
guess I only encountered old implementations then ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Don't you have military shit to do or smth?
Just did the theory exam for CE-category driver’s license
Now waiting for my driver to get out of here
I didn’t want to use the shitty decades old Mercedes GD to drive here myself
And well, the driver’s course overall is full of passing around
Even when we got an activity, usually not everyone can do it at the same time
That was 2 weeks ago
Boring
We didn’t have any ammunition during that week but carried our weapons around to build the habit
Helps a bit against dirt getting in the barrel
But I just try to avoid ever letting the tip go into the ground like that
But it ends with this week
Then onto my IT-specialist position
And soon helpdesk apprenticeship of sorts for ~2.5 months, will certainly enjoy it as it’s a 15min drive from my home and should be able to get out daily.
does the flag have 3 or 2 color?
sun was giving it a bit of yellow flavor
but camo definitelly different
and i haven't seen a single knee protection here
Many knees are fucked nonetheless
Not from blunt trauma, mostly from excessive load
I got a 2nd MRT scan in 2 days to see how my left knee is doing
Free healthcare
You planning on staying in the military after mandatory service ends?
Would this work to lower 12V to 9V DC?
we talked about LM7809 before, but this chip is different
there's dial for output , should be more agile (12 -> 9, 24->9, 24 -> 12 etc) but idk at what cost
arduino.ua/prod650-dc-dc-ponijyuchii-konverter-lm2596-z-4-5-40v-do-3-35v
Uses this chip:
https://www.ti.com/product/LM2596/part-details/LM2596S-ADJ/NOPB
So just newer thing in adjustable variant (-ADJ), but with need for those extra components, which that PCB already has.
LM2596S-ADJ/NOPB - SIMPLE SWITCHER® 4.5V to 40V, 3A Low Component Count Step-Down Regulator in a TO-263 (KTT) package with 5 pins
So 3A switching regulator with adjustable output voltage.
So one of the "more advanced" chips I did mention.
That 7809 is part long time "bottom of the barrel" series for regulators.
Just something that is easy to use and easy to get.
Basically anything in that Step-Down converters category will work as long as the input and output voltages and the current max are in the wanted range.
somehow resulting module is cheaper there
one thing that annoys me about steam is you cant run different games on different computers using the same account
because if its on the same computer its just like... sure go ahead idc
i wonder why...
There was a time of family sharing with steam.
even that was only when the other device was offline
The system is not without limitations, however. Only one device or user can access the library at one time. The account owner is always given preference, but that means if you share your account with your child, only one of you can use the library at a time.
That was the only restriction I believe? And up to 5 people?
Never used it, just know it exists.
Hello there fellow Pioneer!
You're currently chatting in off-topic channels.
Please note, the entire off-topic category is reserved for not Satisfactory related chattery. To comply with your FICSIT Inc. contract, please make use of the appropriate channels in the Satisfactory category. Thank you!
Hello there fellow Pioneer!
You're currently chatting in off-topic channels.
Please note, the entire off-topic category is reserved for not Satisfactory related chattery. To comply with your FICSIT Inc. contract, please make use of the appropriate channels in the Satisfactory category. Thank you!
it exists but you cant run multiple games at once unless its on the same pc or none of the other ones are playing anything so its utterly useless
?
read
is that supposed to be for me?
yup
I asked a guy and he told me to send that here
kill him
So, yeah. Only 1 account can log into the library.
eh I mean he was wrong
also, who?
underpatate
hum ?
you were wrong

oh i was ? sry then

where is the place for technical difficulties then ?
I thought there was a rumored/announced feature where this restriction was reduced from the entire library to the individual game.
Guess there wasn't, shame tbh
this way you have to buy the game two time if you want to play it with someone else
Yeah, AFAIK only one login at a time for specific account.
And with Family Sharing, only one playing specific shared game at a time, per bough copy.
With the owner having priority.
So MagicZ would just need to create second account and family share with it.
you can shortcut some game tho and play it with an alternat laucher. like beamng drive and the beammp launcher
or just delet a file to make the game not check steam but i dont think its legal
yea i know of that just its not a option for everything
it wont work for most multiplayer game
Won't work for anything with DRM, even Steams own.
Okay, but it's just the game being locked and not the entire library, right?
If I were to own GTA and BG3, can I play BG3 while someone else plays GTA?
via family share
It's meant for families; mom and dad go to work, one of the kids can play on the family shared account.
Should be possible.
Dad comes home; kicks of the child of the account and plays CoD.
But haven't confirmed, should be at per game level, not per account level AFAIK, but I might have misunderstood.
It's used for family: I own the game, my little brother gets to play it. I don't need to give my PC to him for him to play my games
Only question is: can he play my games while I play some other game?
Point was, with Family Share the whole libraries under all the accounts in the family share should be a pool.
That's why I used the dad example, if dad is owner, if he is not logged in, other members can use the account.
So have you tested that if "Dad" owns two games, is playing one of them, someone else in the share cannot play the second game as shared, when logged in via different account.
Point of that Family Share is, that you don't share the account.
Every one has their OWN accounts, just the game pool is shared.
With priority to each game given to the account that actually owns the game.
First come, first serve for the others.
I kinda lost what we are discussing here? Sounds to me we keep saying the same.
You seem to keep saying that if Account 1 owns two games, and is playing one of them.
Account 2, part of Family Share with Account 1, cannot play the other game.
I'm saying they should be able to.
I never said anything about multiple copies of same game!
That Account 2 cannot play the SAME game as Account 1, if the pool only has one copy in it.
But can play any other games.
I am not 1000% sure, but I think we have successfully achieved the constellation:
Main Steam Account (mine) and Second Steam Account (wife) -- her's is even a second windows user on our livingroom PC
I shared my games with her via family share.
And I'm pretty sure she was able to play a VR game while I was able to play something else on my gaming PC
Two different games, one copy each, on same account.
You cannot even own multiple copies of same game, on same account.
Not sure if I can play with my own account two different games on two machines, but actually that should work... can test later
So yes, that would confirm that any other game from the account in use can be shared.
Which I hadn't personally confirmed.
No, Steam doesn't allow login at multiple computers at same time to same account.
It kicks the first login out if second is made.
Family Sharing enables you to play games from other family members' libraries, even if they are online playing another game.
store.steampowered.com/news/app/593110/view/4605582245626919823 - Wed, September 11, 2024
but then in-home-streaming should not work and that I've used on multiple occasions
Ok, I can misremember how it works.
Or it might have changed since the last time I did that on accident, LONG time ago.
But that was what started the conversation, MagicZ complaining he cannot play two different games on two different computers with same Steam account.
Also, not all games are viable for family sharing.
Developers of the game can decide if they want their title to be eligible for family sharing or not.
And went into if Family Sharing with second account would work or not.
it dosent it forces you to clsoe the other game running or asks if you want it to do it and if you say no its dosent launch
With some seeming to say that even with Family Sharing, playing a game on one account would lock ALL the games on that account out of the Family Sharing pool.
And not just that single game.
could this be a regional thing even? like some EU regulation forcing them to allow more where I live?! -- wild speculation.
I'm intrigued now and want to try this later.
you can launch 40 diffrent games at once as long as its on the same pc but if you try to launch 1 on a pc an 1 on the other it wont let you making everything this system is trying to avoid useless because you can do it anyway
Yeah, forgot it isn't allowed for all games.
But if it isn't allowed, then it is never part of that Family Share pool of games.
So, I just did the test, started shapez.io on my livingroom pc and starting torchlight II on my old laptop has the laptop telling me that I'm already in a session on that other machine and that it will be kicked out
aka exactly what i said earlier
same steam account, same internet connection, Germany -- in case that matters
Mercedes has a developed "Solar Paint", this paint on cars will add 12.000 kilometers per year for electric cars based on lightning conditions in Stuttgart. So, Mercedes tested this in Stuttgart. Interesting development.
I just wonder how practical and realistic this new car paint will be.
What if you have paint damage? How easy is this to fix? How costly will this be?
Many years ago there was a startup creating a van with a solar roof and sides.... back then it didn't do much to range...
In Germany and especially the dense regions of which Stuttgart is one - the outside parking spots are very limited, especially in the city centers. So underground parking is almost enforced for new construction... Not saying that would be stupid, if it extends the range while driving, if it helps people on the outskirts to charge it's still good... but yeah, I also wondered about scratches and dents
What if they make it out of the potassium glass to make it scratch resistant
Like an phone screen
well, it also needs to be able to flex, otherwise it will crack when somebody leans on the car...
this sounds like a 20k € paint job to me... would want to park that anywhere public 😄
Also, the 20% efficiency is very questionable.
It's data from Mercedes, so I think it's optimistic.
especially not in europe/germany where the parking spots are still being made according to car-dimensions from the 60s
Maybe we should stop producing cars that are just too big 😄
World: oh no, cars are ruining the world. Also the world: we want bigger cars.
I made the same point a while back, that half of the pick up trucks (US ones for example) can't even park here, just because of how tiny the parking spots are here.
part of the problem is, that mandatory safety features need room, but yes, only part of that... currently looking at going electric and I hate that there is basically no car that would work for me, just SUVs or tiny cars I wouldn't fit in...
and since we're a one-drivers-licence household - and that will most likely not change, ever - a second car also makes no sense, yay
Well, car manufacturers are still able to make small cars with all the EU regulations in it.
So I am not sure if that really is the reason why cars got so big over the year.
Need to be bigger on outside for same cabin room.
But mostly about just giving more cabin room.
cabin room is also a weird thing... years ago when I was "shopping" for the current car, I looked at audi, vw, skoda, same "outside" dimensions of the car, huge difference inside... felt like they are pushing people to buy the bigger cars by reducing the space inside...
I didn't fit in a VW arteon height-wise, I was hitting the roof with my head or I needed to lie down so far that I couldn't reach the steering wheel... 😄
but apart from that... almost no wiggle-room in an A4, so I would have needed to go with an A6, which was less roomy than a Passat. Went with an octavia which is a bit smaller than passat but about as roomy - driverside....
Although with electric that will be a whole other story, with floor-mounted batteries - test-drove the polestar 2 once, I almost didn't get in. and for some reason they put a bathtub in for a middle-console, felt like a coffin
But todays people actually fit inside that modern Mini, unlike the old Mini.
And the new Mini isn't absolute death trap in any collision.
People did get into the old mini.
Yes, but it is pretty cramped.
Don't forget, it has less crap on the inside too.
Yeah, I'm definitely on the side of cars being too big
The ultimate comfort isn't even what I'm looking for in a vehicle
Its a tool, not a luxury experience
I think it's a mix.... people are used to have a bit more space as opposed to just being used to be cramped into old cars... but also "door thickness" etc. was lower on older cars
There are other examples than Minis, though... especially around those massive SUVs and Pickups... they often just waste space... like under the hood, where the mechanic could almost just stand upright next the engine etc. 😄
Heh
The problem with that is that conventional rwd or awd drivetrains with v or inline engine layouts require a lot of length but not much width
So there isn't much way to make it smaller without pushing the engine back up under the dash so far that you have to drop it or lift the body for most repairs
Which has and does happen, and adds several thousand to the cost of many otherwise simple jobs
Maybe electric engines can push the size down?
Shrink and slow cars and you reduce the need for bulky safety features.
yes reversing the "arms race"
the problem is the large and heavy battery at the moment. Some eSUVs here are so heavy they're not allowed to park on the pavement -- not that anybody checks -- the limit is at 2.8 metric tons or so...
A lightweight and compact electric energy storage solution would be super-cool, and I'm sure some people way smarter than me are working on it, but apparently they have some obstacles 😉
That space is just being moved over to cargo
It would be possible and very effective to make a small ev, but margins are lower and that's not what the market wants
ice couldn't even compete in the catergory of very effecient, small, and cheap "economy" cars here in the us
No way electric will be able to
And US car market has almost nothing to do with rest of the world, in any way or form for what people want.
i do appreciate that compact SUV (or what i like to call oversized hatchbacks) are starting to show up more in the US
fricking love my Bolt
A lot of eSUVs are so heavy that they aren't allowed to pull a trailer - which is one of the biggest advantages of EVs
US towing ratings etc. are just weird.
And you have excessive (for Europe) weight on tongue etc. to deal with people towing at excessive speeds with bad trailers etc.
what i absolutely hate is how i felt pressured into getting a larger vehicle because of everyone else's stupidly inflated & lifted pickups. you feel like you have no choice to go bigger or be at serious risk of instantly dying in a wreck around here
Which also goes into US seeing driving license as a right, not something that actually needs to be earned.
So the driving education and testing is really lacking, leading to lot of dangerous drivers on the road.
Which makes you part of the problem
But yeah, as a cyclist, I completely agree.
These gigantic SUVs are just super frightening
But basically needed with the way US system is split between Trucks and Cars, where Trucks can be death traps for anyone else.
In crash situation.
for me it's the pressure to get an SUV which I still resist with every fibre. With the switch to working from home, my long commute got reduced to almost nothing so the advantage of the Diesel is rather a disadvantage at the moment, but a car that is fully paid off doesn't apply too much pressure.
Well, they want us to believe that driving is a privilege, not a right.
Well, the country was changed since 50s into a one you cannot live without a car.
i know, but i also limit my driving when i can, which i hope helps
Counter argument: but I am a free person. As a free person I can drive.
Counter counter argument: you live in a society where you can harm other people, they are also free to live.
but i also didn't go that big with the Bolt 🤣
I don't know who is right. I just know the arguments 😄
Your freedom to swing your fist ends where my nose begins
it's just bigger than what i used to have, & a TON safer
plus when i bought my old car i promised myself it was going to be the last gas car i owned
Counter argument: but today, whatever you do is a swing that hits your nose. I know this argument far too well.
Ironically, SUVs are less safe in basically every other scenario than car vs car
I could comment that in a very dark and cynical way -.-
Point I trying to make, there is logic in all arguments.
Then you should probably take a step back and reflect whether you're actually around oversensitive people or just being insensitive
Yeah, but point is, when US vehicle made to "Truck" standards hits any US vehicle made to "Car" standards, the car will take lot of damage.
Because those trucks don't need to have crash zones etc.
Mhh. How can I be insensitive, if other people are sensitive?
No, there is logic in some arguments and misdirection in others
No, you just don't like reading it because it doesn't fit your narrative.
i used to have an ancient pickup, & i absolutely hate the trucks made today. they're so useless
"anything you do is offensive nowadays" isn't a logical argument, it's an emotionally loaded statement unfit for any rational discussion
- I am not saying which argument I agree with.
- I am stating I know the arguments, from discussions before. I know that people think in different camps.
Insensitive in regards to you don't care about surrounding and just flail your arms.
There's probably a better word for that
Freedom as a concept is such a heated topic anyway and people view it differently.
Doesn't matter what you agree with, you asserted logic to an argument that doesn't have it
I disagree.
LOGIC: We have more and more people around the world, we have more and more diversity in opinions. So people clash more often.
Again, you disagree whatever doesn't fit your narrative. And call it "not logic" just because it's not logical for you.
i'm waiting for a car with a superhydrophobic interior that i can just hose off
What do you do with your interior? 😄 I mean, how does it get so filty you wanna hose it off.
I like the German constitution in that regard:
Article 1: human dignity is inviolable.
Article 2: every human has the right to freely unfold their personality as long as it doesn't violate other's rights or the constitutional order. Every human has the right to live and be free of bodily harm. A person's freedom is inviolable. Only laws are allowed to impede upon these rights.
America, the land of the "free"
But you are not free to choose your mode of transportation. It's car or die
Article 1 was cut drastically short, but that's the gist of it
i want an interior that i can treat like the bed of a truck, but won't age like that 🤣
Again, I think it's more sensive, to just trying to understand both sides. Than: I pick this side, and I am not even going to try understand the logic of the other side. They are just wrong. There is no logic. End of story.
I logically explained why the statement has no logic.
The only way it can hold up is by creating straw men.
This logic has one key flaw: disagreement on opinion isn't offense
also can we have a global ban on using piano black plastic in cars?
To go back to root of argument, I can see where some countries come from when they see car driving as a right. And I can understand that some countries see it as a privilige.
The fact that we have this happening in the world, proofs my point.
Ironically, that's what you're doing rn.
Side 1: I want to be respected in who I am and what I want to be.
Side 2: lol no fuck you
Side 1: can't you just leave me alone please?
Side 2: no, you have to be on my side and if you don't like that, sucks to suck
Side 2 is objectively wrong in both of these instances.
You state that one should always consider both and try to find the logic in both.
Look up enlightened centrism.
Because why would one say: it's a privilige, and a other say; it's a right if they weren't sure they have a solid case of logic?
The US un-railroaded themself into the first
No, that's your interpretation of what I am saying. 🤷♂️
Also half-dismantled lot of cities and inside city mass transport systems etc.
As I said, un-railroaded
Days ago I said I view car driving as a privilige and went into why I never drink and drive etc.
You get privilige to drive a tool of mass deaths if wanted.
Now I say that I can understand why some view it as a right because "we are free to do what we want" it doesn't fit your narrative and I am the baddie 😉
When you demonstrate you can actually use it responsibly and with enough skill.
To not be constant danger to everyone else.
Interesting conversation here but y'all are really toeing the line on politics 😄
I can see the logic in both and it comes down to who the burden of proof is on:
Do you need to prove your ability to safely operate a vehicle?
Or does the government need to prove your inability?
This has to be decided on a right-by-right basis
I think we can all agree that mass transit is more effective and economical on a whole, but allows less individual flexibility and requires more thoughtfullness and planning in your schedule compared to personal vehicles
As is what you said about me
yea if we didn't have dogshit mass transit around here i might not even have bothered with a newer car
I don't dismiss anything as illogical merely because I disagree with it.
I dismiss things as illogical because I fail to see the logic
As someone who commutes on bicycle/bus currently, and is from a very rural area, I think I've seen both sides of it? And frankly it just doesn't take that much to commute car-free. However, I would not be willing to give up the abilities owning a car gives me
Thing is: that's a matter of opinion and there can be endless debates on it.
But there are portions of this discussion that aren't up for debate. For example: people that are proven to be incapable of operating a vehicle should not be allowed to do so.
It's just too valuable and in a lot of ways, especially in rural areas, critical to my lifestyle and the things I like to do.
Owning a car should be a choice, not a requirement
in a perfect world
Oh, ideally 🤷♂️
But my point is that when it comes down to it, in a lot of areas, it's a choice that very few would willingly give up
we have buses here, but it's downright suffering to wait at a stop when it's 50C. and nobody's build an underground tunnel here because it'd cost a billion per km easily
A car is so convenient.
Same here but opposite problem 🤷♂️
Waiting at the bus stop in -10f with tons of wind is a miserable experience
Especially because there's always a chance they cancle the bus if there's too much snow
So I just end up driving 🤷♂️
what about doing grocceries? And what if you need a lot of grocceries?
There's incredible waste and inneffeciency in the generality of public transit
You put it all in bags carry it on public transit?
For me?
I have a grocery store close to my house that I walk to if I need just a few items, otherwise I drive
Or you do it multiple times with the bicycle?
Because our bus system specifically does not allow this
You can get trailers for your bike that allow you to carry more than enough
and what about deep frozen grocceries during the summer?
Oh that's not an issue, just a few layers of paper bag or a blanket will keep them safe for an hour or more
But I'm with you on this, I think
As I said, I simply wouldn't give up what my car offers me even if I can commute on public transit most of the time
I wouldn't give up my car. Just find it too much fun to drive 😄
we're also way too low density to justify something like a metro system. 5 million people in 40,000 sq km
we are prime for a mass electrification of cars tho
300 days of full sun a year
I also use my bicycle sometimes, but like now, I would need to spend 30 minutes on my bicycle to get some fries, than 30 minutes back, fries are going to be cold.
That as well
I think we need multiple solutions to reduce car ussage.
And for me, I'm very very often driving 20-30 miles up into mountains on gravel roads in areas with literally no population 🤷♂️
Not gonna do that with anything but a car or orv/utv
And still most of US has completely given up on the fun-stick to extent that manual gearbox car models aren't usually even for sale anymore.
Even for car models that have that for several variants in EU.
1. Produce locally. Work locally. Shop locally.
2. Better public transit.
3. Investment in infrastructure for alternative transportation; bicycles, steps, horses, .... (atleast for my country).
But I think number 1 is most important.
But for jobs, a lot of offices are in cities. So you get hotspots where people all go too, and most use a car in my country to get to the cities.
As far as I know, there are only three models on sale in the us with a manual at all for my2024
A lot of it could be addressed by mixed residential/commercial zoning, which is unfortunately rare
Yeah ... agree. But that's rare over here.
i 100% agree that driving licenses around here are way too loose, which is why i consider myself spoiled that my school had driver's ed, complete with a driving range, and insurance paid for dedicated lessons in exchange for a long-term discount
they killed off funding for it a long time ago, but the range had about a dozen cheapo cars, a radio station for the teacher to give instructions, chicken brakes in all the cars for emergency intervention, a 4 way traffic light, a hill, & standard lane lines plus parallel parking zones
and this was a public school in the US, not private
We learn to drive on the road 😄
my driving school didn't have any off that. It was just parking lot, quickly driving on the lot itself (5-10 minutes?) And then hop on the road.
this was also way before driving simulators were a thing
I like it Cuyar.
Still reminds me I have to go for my crash course. Not mandatory in my country, but I want to take it.
the district/city paid for it for 30 years because every time it came up for a funding vote, insurance companies would show up at the council meeting to show how it more than paid for itself in fewer wrecks & tickets
And those are recently lowered standards, that immediately hit on first try completion percentage HARD.
As in tens of percentage points.
i love the idea of income-proportioned traffic fines
I want a point system for licenses. X points = lose license.
Isn't that in affect in some states in the US?
Here you can even have your vehicle taken over by the state if you keep fucking up enough.
Oh here too. But that's ordered by a judge.
Not based on a point system.
Point system seems more fair to me than judge.
here it's 24 points in 3 years. violate too much & you get your license suspended
Also you can lose your license for a time or permanently.
For example three times caught speeding in a year for temporary one.
In addition to those income related fines
Not straight points system, but somewhat similar.
iirc here you don't get your car taken away unless it's reposessed for nonpayment or the vehicle itself is too dangerous
oh yea we also have license revocation
it's mainly for repeat drunks or senility
i don't want to jinx myself, but i've never been in a wreck or gotten a ticket 🤣
well, no wrecks on-road
i've done some damage while offroading in a vehicle designed for it
insurance is still required, but it was so crap of a vehicle that it's not worth claiming
most of the time people get into wrecks because of the other people on the road
like the white californian girls who just got their license and is now looping the starbucks drivethru
Well, somebody is always the "other people"
One rim while I lost control way back during winter and ended up backside forward in ditch filled with snow.
Not broken but steel rim that got out of true, so was used for the spare from then on.
80km/h speed limits on small roads during winter still, so wasn't even probably speeding, but still too much speed.
Corrected two times after rear started to slip on on first curve, in right, left, right curve, but lost it on that last one and ended in the ditch next to next straight.
During winter in night so could see if anyone was coming head on from lights long time before.
Then one headlight broken in collision with guardrail, when approached intersection too fast for the ice in it and went straight, almost stopped before the hit.
And then crack in plastic bumper from another similar case, car before me stopped unexpectedly to let pedestrian to pass, didn't have enough grip to stop in "new" used car that had overaged winter tires with no grip, so had to drive into hard snow to not crash into the other car.
Those tires got replaced next week.
Not always, I can be driving and just wrecking my car by hitting a tree without harming anyone else.
I think what lizard meant, is that it's the fault of someone else.
That wasn't my point
Yes, and I'm saying that somebody is always that "someone else" that's at fault
Like, I drive reckless and I take multiple innocent people (drivers who are not reckless) with me in a car wreck.
Well, rarely we get traffick accidents where nobody is at fault 😄
(im being joking for your info)
Like, slippery ice spots on the road that you can't see.
anyways what im trying to say is
most accidents that ive gotten into (or saw in live footage on the road) were someone elses fault
You saying that people tend to blame others? I agree 😄
I've had one vehicle on vehicle collision(only paint scuffs and a crack in my bumper) and did similar thing and buried my car in a snowbank on an icy highway even going 30km/h below the speed limit with nice studded winter tires
i mean if its a nissan altima in the crash you can tell its the nissans fault
Hadn't noticed they were almost 10 years old at that point, just saw they had lot of surface still and were good make.
And first time the grip was needed.
Yeah I'm just saying it's a rather pointless justification because it depends entirely on who you're talking to
I have some paint damage on my car because of a freaking truck on the highway just firing rocks at my car like it were bullets. Got also a crack in my window because of that one truck. Don't know what it was carrying, but it was flying all over the highway. 130 kilometers per hour.
The real argument you can make is that fault in collisions is anything but evenly distributed across the population
But that first time was intentionally going out and "speeding" safely during winter on public roads.
Just that the speed limits on Finnish back roads are way higher than you can safely drive them at, even during summer. 😆
always try and stay away from trucks
Our backroads have no posted speed limits
So same sort of deal
autobahn?
80km/h on anywhere with no posted limit here.
I never had issues with any trucks, but this one was VERY large and heavy. And I was a fair bit behind it, like 3 cars behind it. Still, the weight of the truck + speed was launching tiny rocks everywhere.
Our standard is 35mph when not posted
wild
now imagine if the tesla semi takes off
it was convoi execptionale.
that guy will speed like crazy on the highway
No 💀
something like this:
Normally they can't drive during day hours, but they don't give a shit about the rules 😄
But I had also made mistake when fitting winter tires that fall, I had put worse tires on the back for front wheel drive car.
So that made it lose traction in the back as first warning, and then that flip.
sounds like the entiritey of the i605 freeway.
and if they drive, they have a car in front of them and behind them marking it's a convoi with lights
But pretty cheap learning experience in the end.
but that wasn't the case either.
One new tire, and need to get people there to get the car out of the ditch with tow rope.
No need for paid service.
"i dont wana replace my tires, but ill replace the whole car however" people are so stupid
Nah, up to certain size, those oversized loads can drive during the day.
Only extra-oversized needs night.
replace < upgrade
I don't think that's the ccase in my country.
Atleast they always told me that convoi exceptionnel have strict rules.
Strict rules, yes.
But that night-only is only for larger subcategory here in Finland.
And AFAIK that too is hegemonized in EU.
That size in the pic would need cars before and after etc. to get everyone slow down and pull to side.
But could drive during the day.
That's for "accompaniment" of other vehicles. So it's 1 from a certain size. 2 and 3 for other sizes.
These are the times they are forbidden to drive. For highway.
Ok, so not hegemonized then, as that is already in effect since 3.5m width.
That night-time is here for loads that need disassembly of infra, or taking ramps in wrong way to get around bridges etc. AFAIK.
Or driving on wrong side of middle divider because of those ramps etc.
Stuff that causes major disruptions, and not just that everyone needs to pull to the side for minute.
- saturday 12h untill monday midnight: forbidden
- On official holidays from 16h untill midnight: forbidden
- From 7-9h and 16h-18 (rush hours): forbidden
- If larger than 30 meters or wider than 3.50 meters, not in between 06-21h.
And there is a reason for that! Because they are freaking dangerous lol.
Fun moment on a highway is when 2 trucks have a speed limiter and one tries to overtake another one
You know what they do here?
They go to the side of the truck, to be sure your light will shine in it's side mirror. And then start turning on the big lights.
Probably take both lanes and drive like that for 5 minutes lol
Untill they move out the way. Super aggresive, but I've seen it happen (a lot).
If that doesn't help, honk untill they move.
But often I see trucks do this maneuver when they see there is no traffic to block. These are the best truck drivers in the world, I love em.
Also, there was a traffic nightmare today when returning from work since traffic lights stopped working and nobody follows the rules
Aren't the rules a bit like a normal junction? 😒
Unless there is an officer on the junction. Police officers are "above" most laws and you have to do what they tell you to do, I believe.
In theory, if everyone follows the rules, there should be no traffic jam 😅
By the time police officers arrived, the traffic lights were fixed lol
Aaah typical 😄
Found some images online, a nightmare in the intersection
I also couldn't cross a zebra because the tram blocked the way lol
This is the most scarred I've ever been. Meiser in Brussels.
I still have nightmares from a 3-lane roundabout lol
That's how it looks during rushhoure. Look at the cars 😄
and then you have pubklic transit cuttin in the middle of the round about.
A lot of cars block the public transit ofc, because the whole thing is congested
I got there once by accident, got lost, never ever again.
An old image of my nightmare (before reconstruction)
After reconstruction:
They added traffic lights (which make no sense for roundabouts if you ask me) and there are tunnels under the roundabout in the last picture
I have no issues with roundabouts. But meiser in Brussels isn't a real roundabout. It's a mess.
Just look at it all.
It's such a big mess.
Roundabouts with multiple lanes crossing just don't work. Ever.
Yeah, biggest problem I see is tram line cutting the whole roundabout
Exactly!
And it's two that kinda cut it off.
If you want to leave the roundabout, to the left, you see more tracks you need to worry off.
everywhere you see checkered pattern are danger zones for cars.
And then you have all the cross overs for people on foot.
Found the best image of today's chaos in the city
So you have to dodge, trams, cars, bicycles, pedestrians, it's a nightmare
and most annoying thing is, during rush hour, there are cops, but they just stand there and watch. They can't do anything.
Yikes.
This is why I never go to work with a car and prefer using public transport
I just park my car near the train station and take the train to the office
Been there done that 😄
How much does it add to your travel time? And how long is your travel time?
or as traffic engineers like to call it: "park & ride" 
I prefer kiss-n-ride 
I leave the house at 07:35 and arrive to the office at around 08:35
So, 1 hour
Train ride is around 24 minutes and will be reduced to 18 minutes when track reconstruction is almost done
For me it was; 2 hours in the car to brussels. 2 hours in the car back to home. Or car to trainstation and then train to brussels added another hour in total travel (back and forth).
Oh no, Ratswegkreisel in Frankfurt: "hold my beer"
a roundabout with 2-4 lanes in the circle, where 5.5 roads meet, two of them are autobahn exit and access, one is towards the industrial area. and there is a tram 3-way crossing in the middle and also pedestrian crossings.
Of course in rush hour mainly lorry drivers with an extra carriage drive into it blocking at least all the lanes from one direction and one of the tramlines, making the entire thing work "in reverse" -> about one vehicle gets through for an entire circle of the traffic lights which takes like 5+ minutes. not missing having to get through there to work
I took me almost 2 hours travelling from home to college some time ago when I was a student and before college moved to a new location
My college was like far away and on the hills
my record was 2.5hours to get to work on one day, for 40km road distance (not even 20km birds flight)
all I find is graffiti when searching "ratswegkreisel frankfurt"
Sometimes I wish europe adopted the austrian traffic planning where small cities replaced almost all intersections with 1-lane roundabouts
Leibnitz is the perfect example and it's so easy navigating that city
Are you sure asablic? When I google:
🤣
Yes, but at least in Germany those are becoming more common. The village where I'm from has about 6500 inhabitants, when I moved away in 2006 they had none, now it's at least 3
That's the first hit 🤣
I can't post a link to google maps :/
https ://maps.app.goo.gl/ZiF4puy8rsFJhyxZ6 -- maybe like this?
It does have traffic lights it seems.
yes, they are part of the problem 😄
they are very dense... like two cars between... and a lot of lorries come through, they instantly freeze the entire thing
That intersection reminds me of the one in the city where I work: https ://maps.app.goo.gl/esX79GsjsBHFGjcp7
How do you know you are in germanny? When you see: audi, audi, BMW, mercedes, mercedes, mercedes, audi, BMW, BMW, ... 😂
Just using google streets to scout the round about and I noticed the same brands
BMW is not a car, it's a diagnosis 
BowelMovement on Wheels 😄
I am diagnosed with it.
How do you know there is something wrong with your BMW? The blinkers are working!
You want classy? Mercedes. You want sporty? BMW. You want inbetween? Audi 😂
Blinkers are an option on BMW. It costs you 1K to add. That's why most people don't get them.
Here, BMW drivers have a very bad reputation
And most of them cause problems from my experience
I think they do all over the world 😄
the neighbouring exit of that Ratswegkreisel was also "famous" -- it was a 2-3 lane roundabout with 2 autobahn exits, 2 autobahn access lanes and 5x 2-lane streets from and to Frankfurt/Offenbach with only some traffic lights near the exits but not on it -- it was basically on the border between the two cities.. it got compacted and replaced by 4 crossings with traffic lights... so roads are now like a hash-sign
yupp, but I've recently read complaints about Skoda as well Oo
I don't think you can connect car brands with driving behavior.
maybe there is a correlation, but I am not sure how big it is.
it's probably "complaints about $currentlyPopularCompanyCarBrand"
"sportive" drivers will most likely opt for sport brands and drive more reckless with them I guess?
and family drivers (people who drive responsible) will opt for family brands? But that's wild guessing from my part.
I heard insurance companies will charge you very high fees if you own a BMW because they consider BMW drivers one of the worst, not sure if it's true though
I bet mercedes owners pay less fees
And that too, how many people own a brand can skewer our perspective.
in Germany that also depends on the specific model and region even
it's more about accident statistics, not percieved image.
so mercedes used to be what people got from their retirement money... so old-people-car image -> many accidents as well, on parking lots or against garage doors etc
My friend recently bought a used BMW and his insurance is much higher than my parent's new car and my old car combined
Although I pay only basic insurance for my car and it's 15 years old
not sure how insurance works in your country... we have liabilty insurance which is mandatory and then also "Teilkasko" and "Vollkasko" which covers damage on your own car.... and then with each year of being accident free the yearly costs go down. But only per contract. I'm e.g. at 30-ish % at the moment. But would I get a second car, I'd have to start at 100% with that car....
and also depends on how much you drive of course
and where you live
"The Croatian mandatory car insurance covers damages in Croatia and the Green Insurance Card System member states. However, it only covers the costs of traffic accidents to third parties – not the party at fault. You may purchase additional insurance, called „kasko“, to cover various events, including you and your vehicle. Kasko compensates for costs associated with theft, bad weather, and when you cause an accident. Other voluntary car insurance can vary by the insurance company."
cool, so about the same
For me it's still 1000€ a year (vollkasko and liability) because the last two years insurances basically doubled their rates industry-wide, I used to pay only 550-ish a year
I don't pay for "kasko" anymore since my car is too old and if I had a major accident, my insurance will write it off as a total loss which means I will only receive a very small compensation
So, I only pay mandatory insurance
Paid €200 last year for mandatory insurance while kasko would cost me around €400 which is not worth it for a 15 year old imo
Here that write off will result in payment that should get you equivalent (model, year, mileage, extras etc.) used car.
So depends if you can afford to get that otherwise or not.
the writing off thing is - at least here - only "is it worth repairing or not?" - you should still get what it would be worth undamaged... had such an accident once, I was surprised how much the car would have been worth still in the eyes of the specialist who priced the wreck.
Do you pay more, for guarantee you will have a car, or just be ready to pay for replacement yourself.
More per month, probably more in total.
Vs. possible one time replacement cost.
I had the accident in the year I was about to cancel the kasko... still had it, the car would've been worth about 3500 on the used marked, but the specialist said 6500 and that's what I got
2005 fiat punto II , 1.3l diesel, 90,000km
My car is probably worth around €5000 right now. If I had a major accident where repairs cost more than €1000, the insurance company will most likely write off the car as total loss and give you a very small compensation like €200
Mileage can cause huge price differences in old cars.
Which is less than the insurance you are paying for
That's why I am not so sure about paying for kasko
Which is why cars aren't counted via the normal deprication ways in Finland, but the actual replacement value.
I think the general rule here is to take "partial kasko" after 10 years and no kasko after 15 years
Partial kasko means you have a percentage contribution to the compensation
If the damage is €1000 and the partial kasko is 50%, you pay €500 and the insurance company €500
okay, that's weird, because kasko should cover the "current undamaged value" of the car, the repairs for mine would have been more expensive than the factory new purchase price... still they paid... even though it never got repaired.
Sometimes i feel like wrong choice of boolean var nmae leads to very stupid bugs of double negative
Insurance companies here are fishy and they are waiting to rip you off
teillasko (partial) only covers certain damages
Recently, there was a scandal where someone had access to the database of all car owners in croatia and sold that database to insurance companies for money
yeah, I call insurances "payement avoidance institutions"
Although it is a public secret for years because the insurance companies would call you 1 month before insurance expires and beg you to take their insurance
They could only know when your insurance expires if they bought a database on the black market....
that's their biggest department, I guess, the one trying to prevent the payout
If we install a black box, we neef to pay less insurance. Eventually the box will be forced by EU.
Oh, my biggest fear 😅 . I am afraid they will give you like 100 contracts with 1000 pages and then hide something important in small letters
Now its optional and it reduces price.
People here are pissed off because new cars have all kind of safety sensors but we don't get a discount on insurance
Safety features mean there is a lower chance of having an accident but insurance companies don't care about that
they also make repairs more expensive
all the cameras and sensors in all exterior parts, more parts that might fail
So you pay double. You pay for the safety features (mandatory by EU) and still pay shitton for insurance.
don't get me started on those 😄
since this year a speed warner is mandatory. camera reeds the speed limit signs and warns the driver.
in my 2017 car it's optional. I switched it off because it's suuuuper unreliable. reads often truck stickers as the signs and very often doesn't get the "end of limit", and often the end of a construction on the highway doesn't even have that sign.
Btw, do you turn off that start-stop system as soon as you start the car? I turn it off because someone told me that "feature" destroys your car engine but not sure if it's true tbh
correction: my parents car has it
no, I keep that on, it's not active when the engine is not warm enough or the battery too low... don't have data on how it is bad... I think it's rather a myth with modern cars
I have a button. I start car, press button and it's off.
I mean, this 
Yes
Oh, nvm
It's called ISA btw.
Intelligent Speed Assistance
It can:
- give a warning
- increase resistant speed pedal
- brake
It will scan traffic signs + GPS data to know how fast you can drive. Depending on which car you bought it will do either of 3 things.
I hate lane assist on my parents Volkwagen T-Roc. It will sometimes activate on curved roads and think you are switching lanes without turning on an indicator and correct the steering wheel
I don't mind it giving a signal.
Gives me an anxiety attack because it feels like a hacker took control of your vehicle lol
And don't try using adaptive cruise control during rain or snow. Tried it once and it detected a phantom vehicle 
ISA as how they (EU) invission it will be a disaster.
Wanted to test it on an empty road how "intelligent" it is. Guess it's no more intelligent than me 🤣
How fucking stupid can you be, to make cars break on visual data + GPS?
- It's easy to replace signs with fake ones next to a road.
- It's easy to hack anything lately and modify data.
Next type of cybercrime will be hackers that causes traffic accidents on purpose.
A group in San Francisco is going around placing cones on Waymo and Cruise autonomous cars, which disables and forces them to stop. https://abc7ne.ws/44dspYn
#selfdrivingcars #car #sanfrancisco #protest #abc7news
I do, if it's pinging every 10 seconds because it thinks I'm still in a construction zone with limit of 80 but I could drive however fast I want... especially when you can't switch that off -.-
You can switch it off if you really really want 
You car may become road illegal. And not covered by insurance, but you can turn it off.
I have no problems with some kind of a warning if you go over the speed limit but forcing the car to lower your speed is a pandora's box
Reminds me of the two autonomous cars standing before each other and blocking each other's paths
EU:
First phase: warning signal, so people get used to it.
Second phase: brakes apply.
I love the fact the 3rd car didn't stop 😂
So either it's smart and ignored it. OR it broke the law in that situation.
Self driving vehicles are becoming more popular, but are we ready to share the roads with them? I take a look at the University of Western Australia's autonomous shuttle bus to test the limits of computer vision. Also there are adversarial bananas.
Perth Science, Episode Sixteen | Adversarial Bananas
#PerthScience #UWA
--
Translations
Polis...
I hate how some companies got EU funds for developing a level 5 autonomous vehicle even though such vehicles are not possible in the next 10 years if you ask me...
EU is dumb when it comes to anything car related.
I don't see autonomous happening in my lifetime as mainstream transportation.
Level 5 means the car can drive itself in virtually any road on the planet without assistance which is extremely hard to develop atm
Even humans can't understand some stupid roads lol
rofl
San Francisco resident Randol White says he heard the noises for the first time about two weeks ago -- he was woken up around 4 a.m. to the Waymos honking at each other. https://abc7ne.ws/3Ai47Ci
#waymo #auto #sanfrancisco #noise #abc7news
Oh, saw that on the news 
We are apparently getting self-driving taxis here in 2026, hope it won't turn into a nightmare considering drivers here are idiots
And the roads are so confusing thousand Einsteins couldn't figure them out
Here is a video btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dinYBGoQ0HA
What does Mate Rimac – the Bugatti CEO who’s currently in the limelight for launching a new hypercar with a V16 engine – do in his spare time?
Why, he teams up with a couple of buddies to solve the thorny issue of autonomous ride-hailing services of course.
Enter Verne, a new company that Rimac and co. have founded to: design and build a ful...
Driving anno 2024: dodge other humans.
Driving in the future: dodge humans and bots 😂
Oh and legally this also will become very fun to unfold.
Who is responsible for traffic accidents with self driving cars? The owner of the car? The brand of the car?
What happens when they kill someone? Does the self driving car get to jail?
For the Netherlands:
Driver is responsible IF driving.
Car manufacturer is responsible IF a system has failed.
Here, we are going to change the law because of self-driving cars and the current proposition is that the car owner is always at fault if a self-driving car causes an accident
What the fuck?
Yeah, I know 😅
And what if I get killed by a self driving car accident?
Then the other person, who has done nothing wrong, is responsible for my death?
And the manufacturer gets away scotch free?
NJB sums it pretty good imo
youtu.be/040ejWnFkj0
It's a law proposition so hopefully it won't be adopted if lawmakers listen to the expert's opinion
Although our lawmakers are well-known for ignoring experts opinions....
I read 1 argument that I really liked that was pro for self driving cars.
"People who can't drive, because of physical limitations (handicap), can still utilize self driving cars." And this, I really love.
Yikes, one of the comments:
Programmer here, I was working on one of the (many many) ECUs that was supposed to be sitting in the UBER Volvo car, handling a safety critical feature.
Not sure if it made it to the car in the end, because it was crazy how the project was driven.When you say that they care about profits and not safety, you are 100% correct.
There were no tests on the code at all while the ECU was already supposed to be delivered into testing vehicles and we (not me, because I got out of it) had to work a lot of overtime trying to even have passing tests in place.
The lead constantly requested, and were granted "deviations" for missing tests and critical features being lacking and told us to not report bugs as "bugs" but as "work items" because they could be held liable if we called them "bugs".
The lead was even yelling at team members because of how badly it was going, despite the problem being the lead having an unrealistic schedule and accepting features that were never going to make it in the time they were requesting as well as the lead putting the priority on new features rather than securing tests.I will state that it was not Volvo or UBER, but a third party they had contracted, but Volvo was the one granting the deviations.
It's really really bad and I'm glad to have made it out from that trashheap.
hope the eu puts some regulations in place asap before they cross the ocean
The last country I know of, was the UK a few months ago. They have a law ready for 2026.
And they gave the reason that I just gave, they want cars to be accesible for everyone. So people who can't drive now, could use a self driving car.
we're pretty much copying eu law on most things
I wouldn't be surprised if Elon Musk drops all regulations to give corporations more power and then lie to people how he is raising goverment efficiency and removing bureaucracy
I've seen this in the past many times
An individual is the “user-in-charge” of a vehicle if—
(a)the vehicle is an authorised automated vehicle with an authorised user-in-charge feature,
(b)that feature is engaged, and
(c)the individual is in, and in position to exercise control of, the vehicle, but is not controlling it.
An individual does not commit an offence arising from the way in which a vehicle is driven if subsection (2) or (3) applies (subject to section 48).
(2)This subsection applies if the individual is the user-in-charge of the vehicle at the time of the act that would constitute the offence.
(3)This subsection applies if the act that would constitute the offence—
(a)results from something done by the vehicle while the individual was its user-in-charge, and
(b)does not also result from the individual’s conduct after ceasing to be the user-in-charge falling below the standard that could reasonably be expected of a careful and competent driver in the circumstances.
So it seems for the UK, you are not liable if the car is in self drive or "user-in-charge".
this one is a bit vague. "standard that could reasonably be expected of a careful and competent driver" ....
Brb in 30 minutes
bro im about to start singing all i want for christmas is ram if this keeps going 😂
im running into ram shortages on literally everything
no wonder my ram ussage is so high im using like 18GB of Vram so 6GB of that is ram taking over lmao
Dafuq are you even doing that takes so much RAM?
Gaming 
Modded Minecraft?
i haven't played Minecraft in like a year so no... but i am running two game instances at once
Huh. Have fun then
I had no internet for an hour and this is what I come back too. Just perfect.
if i do end up comiting to getting more ram... i know 4 sticks of ram is worst but i also feel like cheaping out because ram is still expensive as heck and theres no point in keeping a kit around that has no purpose but would spending over 100$ more just to stay with 2 sticks really be worth it?
yes
if ur on DDR5, 4 sticks is either not stable, or will drop your speed by a lot
well 2 sticks is allready not stable at full speed so its not like i care much anymore
Why is DDR5 bad with 4 sticks?
but yea il see it will probably depend if there are any good deals going around
memory controllers cant take it
probably the same reasson as every type of ram exceeding the lanes max data transfer rate or whatever
those are on CPUs
its worse on ryzen than intel
wait cpu's memory controller can't handle 4x DDR5 sticks?
intel still drops perf, ryzen is not very stable
is it significant or like just the speed reduction
didn't know that, always though 4x DDR5 was viable.
now I have two spare slots for nothing 😂
because if its just the speed reduction i only run 4800MHZ anyway because 6400 still isent stable
6000 should be stable on ryzen. 6400 is known to be the upper limit and may not be stable
and idk what you mean by "still", it will never change
i think 4 sticks locks you to 4800 or maybe 5000 mhz
golden helped me tune it a bit but it wasent enough to matter much
and is there a valid reason why the memory controllers can't be upgraded?
and im not on ryzen i feel like thats probably clear by now lol
is it a technological limit?
its part of the CPU IO die
i have been the only odd one out for the entirery of the time i have been here
idk ask AMD
Will do that next time I meet them on the streets.
im guessing it probably is seeing how server cpu's can handle it altho that uses ECC and idk what the diffrence is and neither do i care right now
they have different IO dies
the IO die (which has the memory controller on it) is connected to the CCD(s) by infinity fabric on package (IFOP)
key word there being package
it would be unbearably slow if it were connected to the CCDs by any kind of upgradeable socket
No, I meant why producers don't make better memory controllers that can handle 4x DDR5
they do, but two sticks are always going to have a higher maximum performance than four
if you make a better memory controller that can handle higher frequencies and get better signal to noise, you improve all memory configurations, and using four sticks places twice the load on each memory channel compared to two
Ah, that makes sense
extreme overclocking boards will only have two slots on them to make the signal even clearer (even leaving RAM sockets empty can interfere with the signal a little)
yea but then it turns into a daisy chain of just faster ram being made to use the newly gained capacity resulting in the same problem each time but at a higher speed level
also if you wanna go bald, go overclock your ram and tighten the timings
hair will be torn out
maybe il find myself a system that isent over 2 grand before doing anything destructive at a bios level
it wouldn't be destructive it'll just be frustrating as fuck
oh and then there's some boards having different memory topology
this is also why you're always told to install ram in slots A2 and B2
otherwise you have the signal going out to empty sockets and bouncing back
or acting as an antenna
this shit is complicated
might all go away if CAMM catches on
i should get off my phone
If i remember the recenty buildzoid video corrextly AMD can should be able to handle 8000 easily, 8800 if you are very lucky. But you drop to a 2:1 ratio of you go above 6000. 6400 in 1:1 is only stable if you are very lucky. Most MBs cap aout in the 7000 range though.
As long as you stay with 1 DPC. If you have 2 DPC it drops to <5000.
Intel's IMC is actually worse than AMDs, the actual specs are just very well hidden
And Intel on DDR5 always runs on 1:2 mode, and has 1:4 mode too.
And AMD AM5 by default runs in 1:1 mode, until 6000MT/s, and above that runs in 1:2 mode by default.
1:1 at 6000MT/s should be ok for almost all AMD CPUs, 6200MT/s maybe 90%, 6400MT/s maybe 50%.
And then in that 1:2 mode, you need at least 7600MT/s to be better off than 1:1 6000MT/s.
On AMD
But like Xeet said, Intel 13th and 14th gen have official max speed with 1x1R DDR5 of 4400MT/s, when on any MB with 4 slots.
The ARK number is only for those CPUs on MB with 2 memory slots.
Intel doing Sale and lease-back on some of its offices...
Just to boost very short term accounting numbers...
Ok, might be just sale and maybe partial leaseback.
Yeah I don't think I can access the 5G modem through my remote desktop
Fuck no
what's the cable for DC 24V 1..2A look like?
i just realised that common 5.5x2.1mm ones are up to 12V
Most time black
i know but that info isent public for the motherboard i have 
Like shown, T-Topology hasn't been used by anyone since very early DDR4.
As max speed on DDR4 was:
2-slots >
Daisy Chain with 2 DIMMs >
T-topology with 2 DIMMs >
T-topology with 4 DIMMs >
Daisy Chain with 4 DIMMs >
With 100-200MT/s RAM speed differences between the steps.
With higher differences between the top positions, and smaller as you get to lower max speeds.
And on DDR5 the difference is so large that that Intel official speed is 5600MT/s for 2-slot, and 4400MT/s for 4-slot Daisy Chain with 2 DIMMs.
For 14th gen.
Is using MHz still relevant? Since that is just the speed of the transistors switching per scond.
The actual MHz from DRAM is half the MT/s, which is often named as MHz incorrecly.
And MT/s is the actual transfer rate of RAM.
Been like that since DDR1.
Basically no-one uses the actual MHz for DRAM, ever.
And just use it when talking about MT/s in actuality.
RAM speed used to be measured and expressed in megahertz (MHz). However, this measurement is now being reconsidered and could be expressed in megatransfers per second (MT/s).
This statement got me thinking about it.
Yeah, and point is, 6000MT/s DDR5 is just 3000MHz.
But no-one talks about it as 3000MHz, but incorrectly as 6000MHz.
And if you would talk about 4000MHz DDR5, (8000MT/s), everyone would think you have very shitty RAM.
Marketing should never get near tech specs
I still remember the "Pentium Rating" of the AMD processors, like Athlon, Athlon64, Duron etc.
Basically SDR DIMMs were last common RAM type where MHz and MT/s were the same.
Hasn't been true since DDR1, which was released in 1998.
Note that those "DDR#-###(#)" ratings never had MHz in them.
And those PC####(#) ratings were in actual transfer speed.
because bigger number better 
the loss of meaning of Hz really hurts
before DDR there was also EDO --- wondering what that was...
ah that was before SD even...
Seems everything is EDO since then.
But that was first time you could make RAM start to open next address while still accessing the old one.
In a way, but yea, SDR went further.
SDRAM I mean.
Synchronous Dynamic RAM vs Single Data Rate
not Standard Dynamic Range vs. HDR? 😄 😄
But DIP to Short-SIMM to Long-SIMM, to DIMM in form factors.
And EDO was in Long-SIMMs only AFAIK.
No, seems it was in the short ones too.
No, wasn't, only 72-pin ones.
my first PC had still the 32 pin ram slots 4 of them and two of the 70-something-ish, the ones that were diagonally
are you sure its not the Soft Dynamic Range vs. the Hard Dynamic Range 
Short (30-pin) and long (72-pin) SIMMs
Where one long one was equivalent to two short ones.
In bandwidth.
yeah, probably... it was a 80486 80MHz CPU
Sorry, even more.
short is 8-bit, long is 32bit
So on 32 bit RAM bus, you could use four short ones, or one long one.
And 486 needed 32 bits worth of RAM width.
SIMM = Single Inline Memory Module, contacts at same position on different sides of the memory module are connected.
DIMM = Dual Inline Memory Module, contacts at same position on different sides of the memory module aren't connected, to allow double the number of signals in same size.
Never released RTX 4090 Ti found in trash Imagine stumbling upon the world’s only (known) prototype GPU in a pile of trash. RTX 4090 Ti Prototype, Source: This_Explanation_514/Reddit As we reported many times, NVIDIA was preparing to launch a very special GeForce RTX graphics card. The card had several names, including RTX 4090 Ti or […]
That is major confusing
Because almost everyone has been using MHz wrong since that 1998 when talking about RAM.
Because people are stupid?
But even Windows was doing it wrong, but latest Win11 finally is using MT/s.
"Why does it matter?"
"Everyone knows what I mean!"
Because it's wrong? And confusing.
You don't need to try to convert me 🥹
So, if I have 6000Mhz stick, it has 3000MT/s ? More or less?
No, if 6000MHz stick existed, it would be 12000MT/s.
You have 6000MT/s stick, so 3000MHz.
Oh, it's 2x.
DDR: Dual Data Rate, two bits per Hz per data pin.
MegaTransfers per Second is double the MHz in that case.
Btw, I was thinking about yesterday explenation about why 2x DDR5 is faster than 4x DDR5 and the cause was the memory controller on IO die on CPU. And people said:
If you upscale memory controller, it will be linear, so it means that 2x DDR5 also get's faster and will always be faster than 4x DDR5.
But that got me thinking, isn't one stick not the fastest then?
Because currently the memory controllers on consumer side are 128bits wide.
One DIMM is 64 bits wide.
Yes, but I said, why do manufacturers not upgrade the memory controller.
And people said to me: 2x DDR5 will always be faster.
More pins, more traces, more cost, more die area, larger sockets.
Because if you make better memory controller for 4x DDR5, this will also benefit 2x DDR5
Not cost effective for consumer.
But reason why on Threadripper and server platforms etc. have shitton of channels now.
And why that one generation of Intel HEDP had 3 channels.
So it is possible to get 4x DDR5 speeds closer to 2x DDR5? But it's just not cost efficient for consumer.
You need to differentiate between amount of sticks, and amount of channels.
4 sticks on 2 channels is just more memory.
Not more speed.
I was just confused why 4x DDR5 doesn't perform aswell as 2x DDR5. I though we would be able to handle it.
And more sticks on same channel lead to lower max frequency on that channel.
People said 4x DDR5 can run but at lower speeds.
More load, more reflections, more interference.
Leading to lower max frequency.-
Been same for ages, but DDR5 takes it to insane level on how much frequency you lose for 2DPC over 1DPC (DIMM per Channel)
Ok, I love my current build.
But in hindsight, with this new knowledge. I might have opted for 2 slot mobo.
Because now i have to slots for nothing rofl.
On Intel 14th gen, official DDR5 support:
1DPC board, 1DPC RAM, 1R RAM: 5600MT/s.
1DPC board, 1DPC RAM, 2R RAM: 5600MT/s.
2DPC board, 1DPC RAM, 1R RAM: 4400MT/s.
2DPC board, 1DPC RAM, 2R RAM: 4400MT/s.
2DPC board, 2DPC RAM, 1R RAM: 4000MT/s.
2DPC board, 2DPC RAM, 2R RAM: 3600MT/s.
AMD 9000:
1DPC, 1R: 5600
1DPC, 2R: 5600
2DPC, 1R: 3600
2DPC, 2R: 3600
AMD 5000:
1DPC, 1R: 3200
1DPC, 2R: 3200
2DPC, 1R: 2933
2DPC, 2R: 2667
So to get better speed on DDR5, you would need CPU and MB with more than 128 bits wide memory controller.
So 192 bits wide for 3 channels, when you would then need 3 DIMMs for full speed, 256 bits for 4 channels, with 4 DIMMs etc.
Where current servers are at 12 channels per socket.
I don't blame you at all GS 😄
The B650M HDV has one of the best ram OC scores despite the low price
But now I can follow more why two slots was suggested.
And I remember it, but I just though 4x DDR5 was viable upgrade path
which seems it's not.
Not really, if you don't need more RAM than you can get as 2 sticks.
That it isn't viable upgrade path, because of the downsides.
Even on DDR4, that was mostly stupid thing to do.
So many unstable computers from people trying to do that with XMP on...
But if the stuff you do needs more than 96GB of RAM, going to 4 DIMMs with lower speed, or to much more expensive platform, are the only options.
Because that drop in RAM speed is lesser slowdown than running out of RAM.
Hehe
And well to get those speeds you need manual tuning
For most users aka anyone who doesn't OC their ram, the amount of slots doesn't actually matter tho
And I mean manual OC, not some ez 6000 xmp
I just love being right, need the ego boost lmao
Don't mind me
I never said you were wsrong did I?
I don't believe so
"it would be handy that I have rgb headers I guess..."
There is so much stuff to consider when building PC's. I had to make choices.
yup
But it's a lesson learned for me.
I'm building another PC this weekend for my friend's brother
Next PC will be 2x slots 😉
Mainly that 4 slots matters for when the computer goes to some secondary use in due time, and you get free RAM.
When the RAM speed doesn't really matter anymore, and using crap RAM to get to high enough amount to still be usable is good thing.
Yeah
True, but I have a 20 year old PC for that. And I still even have used it for anything since... well 20 years ago.
But the fact remains, 2x slots is actually better 😄
Yup, been for long time, just much more extreme with DDR5 than before.
Because 2 slot boards are either the crappiest lowest cost ones possible, or high-end OC boards with price to match.
Because on anything else, it is seen as a minus.
And reason to avoid.
Yup, as that B650M-HDV is the crappiest B650 board ASRock makes.
And below it there are only A620 boards.
Yet it's a very good board
Good enough for most use.
And I'm recommending a A620 board for office computer for example.
Yeah, I think I picked Pro RS pure for the RGB header. I was sold on the Lian Li case they suggested to me.
Ah well, we will see how long this build lasts 😄
Besides the CPU woes (which are resolved for the moment) it's a good PC.
Funny shit all I'm saying
RAM frequency usually isn't the be-all, end-all MB quality except for RAM benchmarking.
Good basic board.
Indeed but there's really no bad things about it. It might simply be missing a few features but at that price range it's hard/impossible to find them on other boards as well.
A620 Pro RS is fairly solid as well as a budget board
i almost went with the pro rs, but then the livemixer was super cheap for no reason so i got that instead
Yeah, asrock rocks for AM5
There is one thing II noticed on my Pro RS board, something came off. But it's hard to describe what it is. It's plastic thingy.
Not my picture, but do you see that socket? The black plastic around it, just came with it when I was disconnecting a cable.
Very common issue with that USB3 front panel header connector shroud.
Can be just left off, or carefully inserted back onto those pins.
Yeah, I wasn't able to get it back on and was afraid of bending the pins.
So I just carefully put the cable back onto the pins without the black plastic around it.
Basically the locking to the cable is better than the purely friction fit to those pins.
No glue at all.
Badly designed standardized connector.
Like I said, that shroud is just plastic around the pins, nothing to keep it on except the friction against the pins.
And the hooks that lock the connector to it are stronger than that friction in lot of the actual produced units.
So smooth plastic on smooth metal.
Because it is from cheaping out.
Just nothing in that base spec that would help against it either, and connector that doesn't care about it can be made cheaper than one that would try to fix that issue.
What is all this white plating stuff?
542.95 euro Asrock motherboard.
Ugly 🤮
But I was wondering if those also have the issue.
Still same basic connector, so would depend on the exact part being used.
But very high probability that no change from cheapest ASRock board.
if they can save a cent, they'll save a cent
Still looking at that marble finish motherboard.
It's based on marble kitchen
You can remove it. But still. WTF.
The same for this:
Limited edition... white? Which will eventually turn yellow/brown because of lightning and your hands.
i actually quite like the marble
Yeah, there must be people who like it.
thats they extremely high end
modern white is a little bit better, so that will take quite some time
The sun will effect white plastic.
Still, the marble guards is risky choice for such an expensive mobo imo.
do you not put it in a case?
do you not look to your case?
tinted glass
I look at my case almost daily.
it also faces away from my window
Thinking on what to improve, just looking at the motherboard and GPU.
Thinking I need to vacuum my case for dust build up 😄
But, yes, I look inside my case a lot.
btw this is my mobo:
I like that. Graffiti style.
But ... you have tinted glass and turned PC to window so not sure if you could save some money on a less fancy looking mobo.
i got it because it was cheap
it was less than the riptide lol
its covered by my massive dual tower cooler and long ass GPU tho
and my PC is on my left (glass faces away from me)
its nerver enough
i wish there were more one off motherboards like this available
Might be under Pros too.
another nice bonus
Exactly baldur.
When you expand it.
Oh you right.
Though you meant "it could be either side", but they placed it both sides.
Just leave it away ffs. People can see it for themselves.
it just has a different wallpaper
Yeah but still ... I am jelly.
make sure you use slots 1 and 3, i accidentally put my ram in 2 and 4 and it wouldnt boot lol
when i got it, it was only $140 USD, which was pretty cheap for AM5 at the time
That should be in the manual what slots to use 😄
it is but why would you read a manual that dosent exist
I read "everything" because I am insecure when building PC's.
i had to print mine out
Where do you even get that "1 and 3"?
When it is A2 and B2?
For B650 LiveMixer
idk i just refer to slots in sequencial order
You counting from right to left?
Then should have been second and fourth slot, when going away from the CPU.
So either broken MB, or bad insert first time.
it was bad insert, MB works fine
With Daisy Chain, it is always the farthest slot for each channel.
u right
Better now.
2x32GB is only 60 seconds now.
With AGESA and BIOS updates.
Wdym?
yeah i just looked in my PC and it is in fact A2,B2
So manual has outdated information?
150 sec in that manual.
But AMD has gotten it better over time.
Yes.
And that time, what is happening again? I am going to say it wrong, but is that the motherboard learning the speeds of the memory stick?
My very late two cents to the RAM speed debate:
The first D in DDR stands for Double because data can be send at the rising and falling edge of the clock signal. Thus the Data rate is double the clock rate.
Until late DDR4 the memory controller ran in lockstep with the dimm clocks. But with increasing dimm clocks they are now in a 2-to-1 ratio if the dimm clocks exceed a certain value.
No, if the ram is fast enough it's not a performance loss.
Timings are just the amount of dimm clocks cycles to wait. If the memory controller is now only half as fast it'll just wait half the clock cycles
But that was what it was in the first AM5 UEFI versions.
Or some sort of calibration between motherboard and memory sticks?
Memory training, calibrating the IMC to RAM and MB.
And happens on each boot, if specific option isn't on.
Right, memory training!
Just that with DDR5, that is much slower than on anything before.
it stores the data tho, so if you make sure to turn on the setting it wont train again unless u clear cmos
It does, just not on every boot.
huh, i haven't run into it since first boot
On every cold boot iirc
There are limits in calendar time between trainings, and if the temperatures change too much etc.
i see
And that full power removal too.
If you replace a CPU without clearing CMOS, does it automatically train again?
IMC is on CPU, so if memory training calibrate IMC -> RAM -> MOBO, and you replace CPU, it should be retrained?
Will be.
Also gets retrained on up to every boot even if that training saving is on, if the old training isn't stable on quick test or something,.
It doesn't just trust that the old training works.
But, the manual speaks of 90 seconds atleast. (2 x 16GB).
My system never takes that long to boot up, let alone 10-20 seconds.
Because it used to take that long originally.
And was weird.
With 2x16GB it takes up to 30 seconds today with latest AGESA.
the retraining on boot must be quicker and more lightweight then
Also remember, in most cases you are never shutting the computer actually down.
Even when you use Windows Shut Down
well yeah else stuff no works.
Why does it look like someone dropped paint on it?
That's why turning off the power switch back at the PC gives different behavior than shutting your PC down for a few hours.
Because that was the goal in artists and marketers heads?
Also why you lose your date and time when you disconnect PC for long time from power grid.
Waste if I'm never gonna see it.
Do you like the other motherboard more I posted?
Nah, only if the CMOS battery runs out.
Just that it isn't used anymore if the standby power is on.
What did I say?
Marble one?
Disconnect your PC from power grid for 1 year. See if it still has date and time.
damn blender torture test on my CPU getting only like 65c temps
Should be good for about 3-5 years of disconnected time since the battery was inserted.
See, still has time limit.
And reason why it is replaceable?
Same, why... I'm never gonna see it.
Get out of here all.
Getting harder and harder to get case without window.
I really don't like that.
Feels like I am the least knowledgeable person in here, who actually enjoys looking at the inside of a PC 😂
i do too, but my desk layout says no
I don't know why I need a window on it, when it sits under my desk.
🤣
Reason why I still like RGB, so I can see inside my case.
i do too but having a desk large enough to be able to do so is a pain
rgb is a pain tho
ehh its not that bad
software, connecting cables, bleh
My 2meter desk has other important stuff on it, like plushies.
if i put my PC under my desk, i will 100% accidentally kick it
with that I agree, what i did was; skip software.
I just use BIOS, set it to one thing. And forget.
Nice foot stand 
thats why i put my alienware there because its the only crapbox i have that can handle being kicked 40 times a day
also i have the fractal north, i wanna see that
interesting
mine just arrived today, waiting for the other hardware to arrive 😄
fractal case for raspberry pi:
I want that too lol
you cannot buy it, but you can 3D print it.
fractal made it for a stand for some event. It caught eyes 😄
My pi needs to actually be setup again first
I got mine with the tinted window... I like it when it just glows with a bit of colour from inside...
Same, except i turned all the rgb off so i use a flashlight to see inside lol
and it's on a rolling cart with drawers next to the desk because it's a standing desk... but floor is no option because the VR cable(s) go over a pulley system on the ceiling.... that would reduce the range by a meter
VR will be dead for me until I get new HMD, though -- microsoft just bricked mine by removing WMR
You enjoy VR? Or testing it out?
I actually do enjoy it, there's weeks without it, but hl alyx was awesome and walkabout minigolf is also really nice to just relax a bit... playing it with my wife sometimes... and my dad is addicted to it... whenever they visit he wants to play it 😄
I have an HP reverb G2, -- nice resolution you don't really notice pixels and especially no screen door effect, less ghosting than the index, but the inside out tracking is pretty flawed and the level of tweaking you need to make it work reliably with steamvr games and valve knuckle controllers takes almost all the fun. will save up a bit to get myself some other headset with lighthouse tracking support
vr is mid honestly
my valve index is great for the 5 games i enjoy
its kinda in a awkward spot of it sucks and no one wants to improve it
i love it but can't tell someone to spend £1000 on it