#off-topic-tech
1 messages ยท Page 105 of 1
Dual boot is a thing you know
Like 10% faster
Supported?
Idk i just turned on proton and it works without issues
Dual boot takes effort and I'm lazy
How do you dual boot?
You have two partitions, one for each OS.
Then you set it up in BIOS what partition to boot from by default - and some way of telling it "actually no, today I wanna boot this instead"
grub my beloved
I'm curious if there are any cpu benchmarks for satisfactory 1.0, ie wether the 14900 or 7800 lead the way or another
Much simpler today.
One partition per OS where they actually live, then there is the "hidden" UEFI partition that has all the boot loaders, and UEFI can itself select between those.
Or you can set it to boot the GRUB by default and that then allows to also select Windows.
And Windows doesn't nuke that GRUB on the UEFI partition anymore like it did with old MBR.
X3D all the way for SF
Also:
14900?
Except that Windows still fucking does that sometimes lol
@dire igloo Thanks. I got a 7900x3d and 7900XT. Testing to see the limits of the game. Seem to find around 100k objects (scim) is when the cpu limit starts kicking in.
Just sets the UEFI default boot to itself and not GRUB.
And can just be changed in BIOS/UEFI again.
Doesn't completely nuke the GRUB like it used to.
That was different.
So windows didnt break dual boot?
7900x3d is worse than 7800x3d and 7950x3d
It still did.
Also, 9800x3d is rumored to be announced early next month
Has anyone hit the cpu limit with a 7800 or 14900 yet?
You can do that easily
4090 GPU, 720p Valorant, all low
Or you take a hyper endgame Satisfactory save and run that at 720p all low
Just play city skylines
Then be ram limited hehe
All I need to do is stack/pile logs in Farming Simulator and that will load one thread to 100% and drop the physics engine calcuting the collisions down to 10fps. On a 13900K...
I've been kinda disappointed in CPU reviews for a while. Stuff like this is way more interesting than 500 versus 600 FPS in eSports games.
Meanwhile building/strategy games can get to multisecond hangs.
GN at least somewhat tried laterly, but the selected game just doesn't work as it seems to now floor at 30 seconds per turn.
games having multisecond hangs bave nothing to do with cpu
but poor game design
you don't want to see cpu saturation at all 'cost'
you want to see CPU scaling in relatively optimized workloads (which is what any critically cpu software will ultimately be or it will be a project management problem and not a cpu problem)
you don't want to benchmark the games on cpu
you want to benchmark the cpu with games
then adapt to whatever you know
it will be consistent because of the scaling benchmark consistency
Point was that no-one is reviewing CPUs and including a test that has very high preference for the extra cache.
Like for example Factorios benchmark mode has, Satisfactory has, many other simulation games have etc.
GN tried, but they chose turn based strategy game, and measuring enemy turn times.
But that isn't deterministic, and they chose too "early" save so it floors with current CPUs already.
As the late game saves were too chaotic in run-to-run variance.
ahh yes my favorite 600W on a mobile gpu
How the fuck?
Anything electronic that MagicZ touches starts to glitch.
i told occt to run everythign at once and it broke the readings on hw info lol
Average TDP of the next Nvidia GPU generation:
๐
man...
Just... stop touching GPUs
the worst part is im not even trying... i have been busy trying to figure out how to unshitify my RGB
I love no SMT on new Intel chips
"unshitify" i like it
why is that so good? i thought SMT usually made performance better
It gives more performance in programs that have more threads than the CPU has cores.
But can lower performance on single-thread limited cases if the scheduler fucks up, like Windows one often does.
Wandows scheduler = 
Phis smt4 makes windows apps that are very single threaded crash sometimes ๐
Had to switch from Android to iPhone because the phone started dying after 6 years of use and my sister gave me her spare iPhone
May God have mercy on my soul....
Did any Arrow Lake reviews use Satisfactory? ๐ฆ
Kinda tired of seeing Plague Tale make reviews, even though that's a benchmark disguised as a game.
Timespy is more useful as a frame of reference because anyone can download and use it.
Almost certainly no.
But seems thsoe are worse than 14th gen on the games that love the cache in X3D:s
In case of Star Wars: Jedi Survivor, because of bad coding:
If someone comes out with a really good 9800X3D laptop, I could be interesting in 2025. But I don't have my hopes up.
how much % gain is your OC worth on your laptop tbh
Not asking for myself, just want to know what people think.
It also depends on the particular laptop you're going to use. If it's not working well with your laptop's bottom vent and built in fans, you might be just as well with a $10 stand.
So it can be effective?
Shit, I assumed they were kinda garbage ๐
and like stupid to use if you want to OC a laptop.
I didnt' ask about the laptop, so I have no clue.
but since they mentioned it was for school, I have my doubts.
Undervolting laptops is the better thing to do, go for stock performance at lower voltages.
Or, if the laptop stand's fans are quiet, maybe you get the same overall performance, but it'll be quieter overall than a laptop's fans roaring full blast.
My suggestion to them was to lower their graphics in SF ๐ The complain was: "my laptop is running hot when playing satisfactory, so I want to overclock it." There are a few flaws in this logic.
There's... a lot to unpack there, yeah.
but they said that a cooling pad was the solution for that, and it just made me wonder about em.
Broadly speaking you can wring a little more performance out of laptops, but you're not going to get to a new performance tier.
thats sounds like a laptopified version of the overclock it so high it underclocks itself automatically if necessary overclocking method
defedently not going to improve temps tho lol
How do you overclock so it underclocks?
I know some stuff throttles at certain temperatures, but if you go too high, doesn't the system just shut down?
its like overclocking a cpu to something dumb like 8GHZ it will either insta crash or ignore it and run as fast as it can
but it's patented ! ๐คก
remember the productivity road map consist in removing ability for everyone to ever legally sell something actually useful
Detrimental because if they provide less airflow than the laptop fans, they'll act as a wall and block the air
Use the normal stand without fans
Pat has plenty of bad execution under his belt at this point. But employees would go to war for him if the board starts sharpening axes.
And the new CPUs have been in works for 3+ years.
it's less efficient than the 5800x3d, tsmc 7nm, despite using tsmc 3E
Graphics are Pat's baby, he owns all the terrible hype of Alchemist, aka DG2. Remember DG1? If not, that's understandable. DG2 should have been given the same treatment as DG1, and whatever the first generation is that was actually ready should have been called Alchemist.
i remember larrabee
DG1 isn't Larrabee. It's the OEM only discrete GPU predecessor to Alchemist.
yeah i know, just saying I've seen some shit
Unfortunately it doesn't look like real competition is coming to the GPU market within the next 2 years.
Competition to what brand?
Nvidia. They're just going to be able to charge whatever they want, and continue to be the standard for developers as a result. It's mostly concerning to me because I'm on laptop, which also means fewer design wins for AMD. So my options are going to be even worse.
5090 laptop prices will probably continue to be meme tier lime 4090 laptop. For 377mm of GPU silicon if the rumors hold up.
Mhm. Nvidia is pretty dominant for sure.
Probably little top end performance gain as well. Same size die, same node family.
Hopefully segmentation in the rest of the product stack improves.
They paid for N3 too. Embarrassing.
I love my 7950x3d
That doesn't look right at all
But if it's true, hope Intel managed to lay the groundwork for more exciting stuff
In the end desktop DIY is a niche product. They need Lunar Lake to do well more than anything else.
Intels buldozer
My sources at Intel confirm. They say
* Suspended merit increases, suspended quarterly profit bonus, 401k match cut by 1/2
* Base pay for Grade 7 employees and above by 5% (grades 7-11) to 25% (for CEO)
this is why
all the big brain people fucking ran
Yeah, but more that it doesn't pass the sniff test and I wonder if there's a fault in testing methodology
I know some people taking early retirements from Intel, they're actually thrilled about it. Mostly because the packages are really good and they're just going to take other jobs and be semi-retired.
Intel got rid of all the "expensive" people 10+ years ago.
actually, thats not that bad for intel
Via early retirement programs etc.
yeah i hear things aren't great in there
As in all the experienced engineers etc.
the graph looks very weird tho
why is 7700x above all others from its gen?
granted, its 4 fps
Also zen 5 percent my favorite (insert zen 5 percent screenshot)
probably some hell combination of lack of SMT, inferior memory latency and windows fuckery
it looks like the game just needs more cache and thats all it needs
i bet it's intel default profile on new tests
everybody is basically tied except for x3D
Highest amount of cores on non-dual-CCD.
makes sense
Game tries to use too many threads and the cross-CCD kills some of the gains.
No, not on Intels part, but on Hardware Unboxeds part
I'm trying to find other benchmarks where the difference between the 14900k and 285k are that stark in cp2077
GN?
Do they still do text articles?
It's because there are software problems with the 285K. All reviews that I've seen have shown very uneven performance.
Or have they stopped testing cyberpunk?
yeah some games tank on 11 24H2 balanced profile
Sometimes
Plenty of people still play Cyberpunk. It's Plague Tale tale that should be axed from benchmarks. It's a random indie game with few sales that's less useful than timespy as a reference point. But Plague Tale tale was randomly demonstrated as part of the Lovelace release so we're stuck with it.
They convert their videos to articles
Tom's Hardware sort of looks the same on cp2077
Don't get me wrong, I played them both and I think both Plague Tale games are great.
Hm.
The game does look good tbh.
Indie?
plague tail requiem is a pretty decent UE5 benchmark
Still, I suppose that's what you get when you decide to move off of "fry the fucking sand" as a cpu strategy
That looks better than the "AAAA"games
intel still can't match SoIC
The chips are much more efficient though compared to previous gens from what I'm reading, so good job on actually building something you can improve on Intel
Any generic UE5 benchmark would be better than Plague Tale. Even Satisfactory would be more useful despite it being so CPU reliant.
Isnt that good for a CPU benchmark?
Eh ... Satisfactory might be a bit wonky ๐
some stuff is implemented ... not in the best way?
like global ilumination ...
what game isn't
Plague Tale doesn't even have a built-in benchmark, so you're also relying on subjective testing
Translation:good job intel for not making something that will melt in a year
well, they stated global illumination is available, but not really optimized.
we hope
Hey, it's a bar Intel doesn't always clear!
LOL
Does anyone know, what criteria a game must have to be a good bench mark game? Because I was thinking, cyberpunk was trash at the beginning.
Who/what decides this?
well we now have an extremely rare case of intel and amd using identical processes, and uh
not super great
I think run to run variance should be low
Deterministic?
Popularity should be a big factor in my opinion. Otherwise it's not a useful frame of reference. If a game has a free benchmark tool, that's fine though.
Eh, AFAIK both companies decided to stay in place performance wise to work on efficiency and setting themselves up for later, which is fine, at least I'm not missing anything with not upgrading, which makes me happy
Isn't that just for physics?
Wasn't Crysis once used for benchmarks?
ye
Yep
Aren't physics important for benchmarking?
And I mean deterministic, if you run the same test over and over again, it should give the same result.
amd's bigger strategy is more efficiency means more cores on EPYC, even if that means we don't get blazing fast gaming products. Intel's strategy is oh fuck everything is on fire 20A is shit we need TSMC
Well if it has a big effect on performance
Yeah, as it turns out chips can only take so much power before they break
To me it looks like high demanding games (gpu/cpu) are preferred for bench marking.
gelsinger has been the entire fucking company on 18A
They shoulda hired Magic as an advisor, then they would've learned that without subjecting people to it! :^)
Nobody would use Banana for it, which is 3rd popular game still on steam ๐
Your definatly not wrong there
i hope it pays off. we need intel as much as we dis them
you have any fuckin idea how much better that would need to be than N3 to make up the difference?
alas, we are cooked
i have watched intel fuck processes up for almost ten years now
if we lose them, its just AMD and qualcomm
i got no reason to think 18A is any different
"they say it's good!" they always say that
and then we are back to skylake for another decade
Btw, Apple will probably announce new models with M4-soc next week.
We from Toilet Duck...
apple's competition is no competition, they'll just hole up in their mac bunker and bilk prosumers of their money
The IP/assets will go up for sale if intel goes bankrupt, and we'll probably come out with Intel again.
even if the M4 shits gold, which it do
also yeah pretty sure us government will intervene in intel
Yeah, you are not wrong. Apple is kinda in its own little bubble.
hopefully still an American or at least western based company
anyone reading this isn't gonna pay $1500 for an 8GB RAM laptop
The government would never let a foreigner buy Intel
very true
Yeah get ready for the ryzen AI PLUS ++19985 AI XTXTX+++++ for the great low price of 2999 2percent faster than last ten BTW
except.... november 5th
yeah it's national security at this point
The house cleaning that comes with a bankruptcy can be good in the long term. But it's of course awful in the short term.
speaking of apple, somehow the 4090 is more efficient than any apple gpu
it's 450W but that much faster
Yippe
yeah, nvidia actually knows how to make a hella fast GPU
so do apple, but not super big ones
not really, they haven't been doing it for long
Does Nvidia break out desktop and mobile GeForce sales? I don't think Nvidia is ever going to abandon efficiency completely.
still not sure trying to reinvent imagination was a great idea
they been doing iPhone graphics for like 17 years
๐
nah they been using powervr
weird
Was looking up data between M2 and 4090 and came across an article. This is a AI benchmark.
probably poor optimization for nvidia
yeah remove the https part
or the tensor cores
not cuda anymore, OptiX
i think ai is its own thing
cuda cant access some of the featues of modern nvidia
i know it doesnt use rt cores
that's what optix is for, but ai doesn't use rt
ai uses matrix multiplication, as in tensor cores, which is very much in cuda
๐
okay so apple can beat nvidia when you run something 25x slower
No, apple beats nvidia out of the box.

But if you optimize, nvidia beats it.
but Nvidia cut its times by more than half when using appropriately optimized benchmark tools.
fucking hilarious
We're leaving the original story intact since it reflects how the non-optimized tool performed.
hack website
all I find are dodgy benchmarks.
ye but I'll have to dig in chat history because as you've found, only apple users are really testing this, and they clearly don't know shit
The most interesting factor to note is the difference in power consumption. That result didn't change โ Apple's chips performed well at a fraction of Nvidia's power draw.
they were TEN TIMES SLOWER
"performed well"
Well, this tells the same story it seems.
that M2 Ultra is a 160W SoC
blown away, but it doesn't feel like a reliable source.
that's just theoretical flops
here's an older one
4090 would be much faster still
they at least come closer than in ai, which nobody is beating nvidia at
(apart from maybe MI300)
lmfao
a laptop benchmark
i cannot remember what the zephyrus used
this is also why apple outright killing dedicated GPU support means they do not care about anyone outside they bubble
I wonder how m4 will perform
CPU wise, real good
probably a 4060 or 4070
curiously they never made an M3 Ultra
guess demand isn't there
and InFO_LSI ain't cheap
stuff is expensive, but so is a 4090 ...
apple prices are pretty brutal. Same as Nvidia's now.
pretty happy with AMD now ๐
a 4090 isn't a PC.
yeah i know but it's fun hyperbole
you can't deny that nvidia's expensive
i got a 7900xtx because i was unwilling to pay ยฃ300 more for a 4080 so yes
apple take the piss
just spent 2 days cleaning my car inside & out for the first time since i bought it
Sponsor: Thermaltake Tower 600 Case on Amazon https://geni.us/wjtN
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K CPU just launched. This review of the Intel 285K CPU includes gaming benchmarks, looking at some of the best gaming CPUs in 2024, power efficiency comparisons of Intel vs. AMD, workstation and Adobe application benchmarks, and more. This benchmark focu...
dumb question for the power draw section at 8:30. does that mean that intel's lying about its power draw?
Those chips are still much more effecient than last gen in some cases
So not lying, just the normal amount of skirting the truth
So that 12v power from the 24 pin does decrease the effeciency gains but not negate them completely
And it is possible(but unlikely) that that power really is just going to the board and not the cpu
There's no real way to validate that
good point
but man those power spikes are kinda suspicious
btw i just double checked my bios, turns out me risking it all to make the jump from 1st gen to 3rd gen also included the 5950X/5900XT, so at least i don't have to redo that
Ah nice
had that thought out of nowhere after i realized how much newer the 5900XT is
that mini panic of WAIT
have there been any hints of black friday sales?
C/2023-A3 from the Takahashi Guidescope on the Calvin University Telescope
we still have a month to go
oh i know but some companies like to advertise this far in advance
I do see that kind of thing 4-6 weeks in advance, depending on the store and/or product.
Sponsor: Thermaltake Tower 600 Case on Amazon https://geni.us/wjtN
This review of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K -- which you can think of like a 15600K -- looks at the gaming performance, production benchmarks, power consumption, and efficiency. Our benchmarks compare the 245K vs. the 5700X3D, 7800X3D, 9600X, 14600K, 285K, and more as we seek to f...
ouchie
My turn to post a boomer meme
I am currently fighting my browser with 3 windows each at least 50 tabs
yea, i'm at 40 tabs rn
i hate doing multiple windows so i do my best to keep it pared down
Same but I keep accidentally doing that
i'd probably have double the tabs if firefox had edge-like tab groups
but my adblockers ended up failing on edge & chrome, & i'd rather have that be functional than tab groups
Firefox has tab group functionality built in but disabled, extensions can re-enable it.
yea but in a workaroundey way compared to edge, i like that kind better
i tried looking for one that's identical to the edge method & couldn't find it
it's like 2-3 extra clicks for the firefox extension to get to a tab you're after
Intel says we can expect a 15 to 20 ns increase in memory latency for Arrow Lake.
well then
Oof.
my tabs are my watch list for entertainment browser video.
the work window is easier to maintain... oh wait, these are not individual 10 tabs - these are 10 groups of tabs... shit
always have been alho i did hear there changing it up and releasing a actualy decent phone sometime soon aparently
there's also this
bruh i have 2 and one is a new tab 
if someone asks me if they should by intels new CPUs i show them this
waste of sand
AMD 5800X: 100.3W & 1216.9 miliseconds. Intel 285: 161.6W & 1194.9 miliseconds. Crazy.
AMD wins the zipping battle.
at least its better than last gen
millions of instuctions/joule
It's still just decompression with 7-zip ๐
Where's this from?
Looks like 3dcenter but I only know the German site
it is 3dcenter
i turn over the calendar
and it's 3rd september yet again
(3dcenter sounds like 3rd december)
Can you link it pls?
Or did you use translate?
am looking for it
According to updated benchmarks on gaming performance by @ComputerBase, Ryzen 9000 has now gained a whopping 7-10% compared to the launch results, roughly reaching the performance level of Raptor Lake.
https://t.co/LbOkLi7omA
1/3
we like sourcing
Hm. gud nuf, fanks
there's a link to the article in the tweet too
Yup, will check it out over the weekend
I live by Hitchens's Razor: what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
the evidence says intel cook'd
Lot will depend on Intel 18a
7 9800X3D is 8% faster than predecessor (15% for multithreaded)
probably already posted:
i am not convinced 18a can save them
even if they literally spin transistors out of manna from heaven, they still have increased memory latency to contend with
and they made the absolutely insane decision to not increase L3 cache size when moving to a chiplet design
plus i haven't heard much about intel's SoIC (3D vcache tech) competitor for a while
and then there's the very real possibility that 18a is merely good
or broken
they have so much work to do
while amd are still using the absolute most basic kind of chiplet tech (apart from SoIC) and running absolute fucking rings around them
y'know in 2016/2017, i remember seeing a really early marketing slide from intel that's pretty much meteor lake / arrow lake, splitting their CPUs up into chiplets and stacking them on one base die, and thought "this will fucking suck when they cut the memory controller off"
AMD proved me wrong
and now, 7 years later, intel prove me right
oh and while i'm on one intel aren't even doing chiplets right cause they don't reuse anything
the CCD you get on any ryzen is what they use twelve of to make an epyc, which gives them huge flexibility in binning
that compute die in arrow lake is for arrow lake, xeons do not use it
you don't get the same flexibility
im on intel also
or are they using 16 of them these days iun fuckin know
they get to shit out one chip design and get dozens of products out of it
I just hope Intel can right this ship because I don't want to end up in a situation where there's only one viable choice again
alas, we are cooked
we are doomed to have 8 core X3D parts for the next 5 years
gonna rename myself to doomerman
I mean, really depends on if Intel can build on this gen
i got no hope
285k was barley any diference
and while amd dominate cpu, they dun give a shit about radeon no more
so nvidia will keep jacking up geforce cost
They're not stupid over there, so I assume that there's a roadmap here
the smart people left when they bonuses got cut
liny only cares about the epyc
afterall what is there to glaze other than a useless bragging right?
liny?
linus
lmao it'll make for great ltt thumbnails
and they'll bilk big companies of all money
(you think this 285k is bad, it is so much worse in servers intel has been cooked for years)
new thumbnail idea: LINUS KISSING THE NEWEST EPYC!
ksp forums shutdown i think also
Sucks to suck ig lol
The layoffs at intel are concerning, it seems they're shedding a lot of talent, otherwise I'd say for the next few gens amd is what you want, in 5 years it might shift back to intel
"I am on Intel" says herg (Radeon RX 7900XT) ๐
my macbook is intel
Just funny.
my PC is
and Apple is no longer a partner with Intel last I know
the older stuff sure have Intel. But those will get replaced.
no way, really11!1!1!!1!1
Well, you gotta consider:
Fire the cheap workers that cost very little and don't hold you back or fire the expensive engineers with their stupidly high salaries that keep bringing up issues?
Here's to hoping intel comes around, we need them to stay relevant, and continue with arc
Do we? 
we cant just all rely on tsmc
you should know about this Mr. Fire Worker
Would you like to pay 1500 for a amd cpu?
Or $2000 for the ryzen 9900x lol
Wait... you said* ARC which is a GPU. So what does that have to do with CPU? Intel can stay relevant for CPU.
Ayo what, no, that's not my name
(It's Firework and errrrrr ....)
If intel sinks amd will do like nivida.
we need arcs
that'd 100% cause ww3
If Intel fails on GPU, we still got Nvidia and AMD. Keeping eachother in "balance".
"mr president, theres a second temu b2 bomber heading towards tsmc!"
amd is loosing to nvidia
Having a 3rd player in graphics is nice.. intel offered av1 encoding on their cheapest card, no one else does that
and intel challenges the 3050
which isnt much but its damm impressive for a first gen gpu
I am also rooting for intel, but I am not expecting much for the next few years.
tbh nvidia is only good for the high high end. Everything else is outclassed by amd and intel.
and creators
I think they can carve out a nice niche in hardware video encoding.. they kind of already have
you killed chat
Ohwell
Quicksync is also nice as a decoder for media PCs
Three things Intel needs to work on:
- Getting rid of the "bad drivers" reputation
- Compete with upper midrange
- Become viable for productivity
So far, number 3 is where they're doing the best
the "bad driver" reputation needs two things; good drivers and time.
and good drivers require more than 2 junior devs working on them 
Tho tbf, arc drivers did improve a lot since launch, especially for modern titles
Still struggling on old titles tho - but who cares about 250 vs 500 fps in siege
why do i need 1000 fps in portal 1?
Nvidia users ๐
Does the Nvidia GeForce MX550 2GB graphics card work satisfactory?
huh?
Hello there fellow Pioneer!
You're currently chatting in off-topic channels.
Please note, the entire off-topic category is reserved for not Satisfactory related chattery. To comply with your FICSIT Inc. contract, please make use of the appropriate channels in the Satisfactory category. Thank you!
Probably not, but It makes a nice paperweight
btw...
expanding conclusion from interview with <insert name i forgot> about ARM competition
GPU field seems to have the same peroperty - it's not like current monopoly at <insert time period> is holding some secrets that let them dominate, because as shown from recent developments, new companies given enough investments can reach considerable heights in relatively quick time (AMD catching up to Nvidia, Intel slowly releasing their first models) (also in CPU space 6 years ago (OMG am i old?) no one believed in AMD)
it's sad that everyone is like "AI is the future" and go use cloud services that bought Nvidia cards...
In DirectX11 mode, yes.
DX11 downsides are that the story/progress videos will not play, just audio.
Far terrain will be spiky.
Other minor graphical issues.
But the video parts are just animated visual gags related to the audio.
Exactly, and good drivers, and being competitive will come with time and presistance.
zen was an astonishing ass pull
I believed in AMD when i was building my PC. 2200G brought me through
lisa su is a goddang genius
How many frames do you expect it to run?
Amd was good in the 2000's they released released x86-64... then bombed in the 2010's with bulldozer until zen
Depends on settings and save size.
With CPU and RAM being more important in long run.
how's your back feeling my dude
Playably for the GPU in low at least, in that DirectX 11 mode, that needs launch argument to enable.
As DirectX12 needs 4GB of VRAM minimum to work properly.
i remember making the jump from 32 to 64 bit
and it involved going from 256mb to a whopping 2gb of ram for $200
on 4x512MB sticks
i can't remember what the gpu was in that one, but i'm certain it was a PCI slot, & when it died, i opened up the case, & 3 out of the 7 fan blades were gone. not just snapped off, but gone. nowhere in the case. still have no idea what happened to them
you can run satisfactory on anything heck i used to play it on the VEGA3 it ran like a dre.... A NIGHTMARE
also has anyone heard about this small very good UNBIASED reviewer?
the person that writes for this site is so nice............
so unbiased..................
they even include something that is fully unneserary..............
even less so.............
most of us simply ignore that site
A lot of you are asking where you should get your information instead. Thanks for asking! And I'll try to help:
For a quick summary on the current situation of, say, CPUs, a video like this is awesome: https://youtu.be/qACIqmP8xgw
And he's just done one for GPUs, too. https://youtu.be/yrsUm26SHGI
I've listed these because the information is rece...
sums it up pretty good
my problem is that if the avarage gamer that wants to build their own PC (and do some research) and they want to see.which is faster this or that? userbechshwarkshcmart comes up first so they click on it and then they say oh,clearly the 14900k squishes the 7800x3d with no problem so they waste a whole bunch of money for no reason
absolutly does
i've always heard that userbenchmark is biased against amd (& they very clearly are), but where did it come from?
It's basically a single curating the site and he just HATES AMD to the gut
i did but they are biased
I don't know that anyone has ever uncovered the "why?" behind the website, but it's basically just someone's pet project.
It's on their website?
Why we do it
It's tough to choose hardware. An army of marketers steamroll social media with anonymous accounts: reddit, forums, youtube etc. Incompetent "moar core" marketers would sell ice to Elsa.
Who we are
We are an** independent team of scientists and engineers**. We do not have time for HR, PR or marketing.
If you believe their own words ๐คท
Our users
Our users are independent thinkers, they demand testable facts and they have no respect for the status quo or the latest fad.
Nothing to do with believing, that's their statement on the why.
But I mean, it sounds so unprofessional. "Incompetent "moar" core" marketers would sell ice to Elsa?"
i never read those blobs of text. without them it's alright to use to just compare AMD cpus between generations, hehe
Since UserBenchmark declines sponsorship, it has become the target of a smear campaign which intensified following improvements to the CPU effective speed index in July 2019. Billion-dollar brands can try to shut us down but they canโt change who we are, the clue is in our name. UserBenchmark serves users exclusively without corporate sponsorship or "free" samples.
The whole about-page feels like a reddit post ๐
I stopped using userbenchmark long ago.
I really thought it was trolling at first, then I started to question some years ago
tbh it's so obvious userbenchmark may serve as amd community toilet flush
Gcam on a moto edge 2022 slaps tbh
Was about to compliment you on the Frozen Edge pick, but why change away from B12 glory
yes but do you have enough side panel clearance ๐
They are there
Just on a pull config
It's push pull
In an H6, madman
I almost had a clearance issue with my mobo VRM heatsink
Its like sitting right on top of it
funny
anyways is userbenchmark trustable?
As trustable as the Nigerian prince in your email inbox
What did you think we were talking about?
erm mogerators!
is it spyware?
but they are infact seoing the max
They claim to be unbiased, yet call amd "advanced marketing devices"
I've been using passmark lately.
I tend to use passmark too, also I reported some cpu data issues to passmark, and they personally responded and fixed the issue (there was a miss in how their system retrieved the data from their latest version hardware databases)
since then, the reading from databases as been clearly updated on the website without the issue I reported earlier
But can it run satisfactory? Hehe
windows... get some help
Appears to be a Buddhist calender, try to minus 543?
You got hit by long time Windows "feature" where it syncs time based on outside HTTP(S) timestamps and not NTP-server.
And all Linux servers have used completely random timestamps for long time already for security reasons.
So normally those are discarded as invalid by that stupid method, but if enough of those random stamps are close enough, your computer clock gets set to completely random time.
the clock is fine i just found it funny because its just another one of thoes circumstances where everything breaks when i touch it lol
In theory for times when NTP doesn't work, or when you need to get initial fix to get NTP working.
But has just been liability since those server timestamps were randomized long time ago to not allow use in timing attacks data source.
Yeah, but point was that there is legit reason why it changed to insane value.
From old Windows part that should have been disabled by default long-long-long time ago.
And sorry, not HTTP(S), but TCP headers.
so if im understanding right it just picks a random number for security?
The servers fake that TCP timestamp option output with randomized time.
And Windows tries to use those TCP timestamp replies it gets to set the time.
When you get large enough number of replies with close enough random number by accident, Windows sets the time to average of that randomized number.
That option is supposed to give the servers unix timestamp.
But that is security hazard today, as there are many attacks that rely on knowing the servers accurate time.
Ah, I was misremembering
So it was HTTPS and like only, and pretty new.
And completely bonkers.
dumb question time
if i got something like the 5900XT/5950X, how worried should i be about blowing a cap with amps
The limiting factor are the power stage/mosfet temperatures, and those have monitoring and throttling if needed.
So you just get less performance if the MB power delivery cannot keep up, as the CPU throttles down.
i've read mixed things about my mobo & its ability to handle the amps
But it only leads to that throttle down on power delivery overheat lowering all-core performance.
And using top-down cooler instead of tower cooler, or extra fan giving the power delivery some airflow can help much on that.
And you can just set ECO mode too for the CPU.
105W ECO for example.
i'm wondering if it's worth the extra $100 over the 5900X
5900X isn't really for anyone.
Either you want single-CCD if you don't need the multicore, or go to the two full-CCDs if you do need it.
yea true
plus it'd give my cooler something to do
and with AM4 reaching EOL i might as well go for top of the line to keep it fairly relevant in the future
But again, if you want 5700X3D or 5900XT depends on what you actually use the computer for.
Do you actually use it for work/number crunching that benefits from the extra cores or not.
Where the extra speed actually matters.
Because the 5700X3D can do those too, just slower.
So if you don't constantly use the multicore, then 5700X3D would probably be better.
it's mostly a gaming rig, with archive work on the side, but i've been thinking about doing more with it
5600X is starting to feel a bit choked off occasionally
& idk if i wanna burn $200 on 2 more cores like the 5700X3D, even if it has the fat cache
i like to do lots of things at the same time, which definitely seems to like cores
Depends on if you want more game performance (5900XT doesn't give much)
Or more multi-core performance (5700X3D doesn't give that much)
i mean, 5600X gets me basically all the gaming performance the 5000 non-X3D can provide
it feels like more cores would be better
Yeah, little higher single-core on the higher parts.
5900XT/5950X is 64mb L3 cache, which is double the 5600X L3, & with the optimizations they've done, i'd hope that'd be a noticeable difference
it's not the 96mb, but it's kinda close
Not really.
Still same 32MB per CCD as the 5600X.
Cross CCD cache usage is slower than hitting RAM.
Point of the X3D is that it has 3x the L3 for the single CCD.
ah crap right
so that explains that
why didn't they make dual socket AM4 so we could do 2x 5800X3D
So if the stuff doesn't fit into the 32MB L3, but fits into 96MB L3, then the speed is much improved.
Or even if it doesn't fully fit, but keeps more of the accesses in L3, and not pure cache trashing.
i'm currently at 32gb 3200MHz ram, should i increase capacity or speed?
if i upgrade to one of the 5900s
Depends?
More RAM only matters if you run out.
most i've been seeing when i'm going all out is around 26ish
Then 3600MT/s would give more performance, from the raised Infinity Fabric speed.
Not so much from the RAM frequency increase itself, but from that upping of the IF while still being linked.
ah crap, nvm, mobo doesn't support anything past 3200
If you have that crappy MB, and was planning to possibly change RAM anyways, why not just update all three then?
And go to AM5 or similar.
If it doesn't have (OC) to 3600MT/s.
Anything above 3200MT/s is always OC on AM4.
oh i haven't checked OC
As that is the max official RAM speed for the CPUs.
3600MT/s is just what AMD says that 99+% of the CPUs should be able to do.
And officially-unofficially recommends for 5000-series multidies
yea lemme give it a shot, gotta hop into the bios for it
BIOS will have options.
Question is if those are expected to work or not.
right
What MB?
Support for DDR4 3600(O.C.) / 3466(O.C.) / 3200(O.C.)/2933/2667/2400/2133 MHz memory modules
From the Gigabytes Spec page for rev 1.x.
So 3600MT/s is expected to work from the MB side.
kk, let's see if it likes me
oh, my ram is 3600MHz rated
k, this better work then ๐คฃ
Try with the XMP on then.
Don't try to manually just set the frequency.
Needs the RAM voltage raising that the XMP does.
Start CPU-Z, show the SPD page.
So just 3200MT/s XMP.
Not 3600.
hmmm
And the part number also says it is 3200MT/s RAM.
Not for that RAM.
well damn
now how do i sneakily swap out ram without them noticing ๐คฃ
k, well, guess that's off the table then
so i guess now it's best bang for buck changes for ~$400
ish
if i go am5 then that's new mobo & ram for sure
but the 5900XT seems to usually be cheaper than the 5950X, so i could put that into faster ram, maybe more capacity for shits & giggles
well, in any case, got some more thinking to do, thanks for the help ๐
Remember that that 3600MT/s is only for two sticks.
If you go to four, official max is 2666 or 2933MT/s depending if they are 1R or 2R.
Down from that 3200MT/s official for 2 sticks of either.
ah right
so if i went 4x16gb i'd actually lose ram performance as opposed to 2x32gb
Yes.
kk, will keep an eye out for that
You can always try to it run the speeds with for dimms. Official support is lower but if the memory controller is good enough it'll work
Unfortunately Corsair is very good at the binning and using the crappiest chips they can for their RAM at each bin.
I have a 3700X and 5800X each running four dimms at 3200
Ah, you meant that way.
I understood trying to go above the current RAMs XMP.
Yes, it can work, at least if you raise the VSOC that isn't done by default at that point, which would happen automatically for above 3200MT/s RAM speeds.
When will EU finally ban daylight saving time, there is no point in using it today....
When they can agree on how to banish it.
If everyone needs to always use old winter time, old summer time, or can choose on per country basis whichever once.
It was agreed to stop switching, but no agreement on how to implement, and then COVID hit.
In short: it will take 10 years until we reach an agreement ๐ซค
I don't really care if it's winter or summer time, just get rid of the stupid daylight saving time
They could just meet in the middle, a one time 0,5h adjustment and call it done for
There are suggestions like this
That is the current status.
With Winter time.
But I would for example personally rather have Finland at +3 all year around.
Basically that pic is just "Winter time all the time, everywhere"
Summer time everywhere would be +1 more to those.
And then if each country could pick, you might get more patchwork, but what would that really matter?
So I would say to make it "Every country decides once" at EU level.
Maybe they could make something like in the picture by making Portugal use GMT+1, region from Spain to eastern Europe (+ Sweden) GMT+2 and Finland, baltic states, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece use GMT+3
Just to avoid a patchwork like you mentioned
Or 4 regions
Found another proposal
that one have more respect for natural timezones
per country random choice would be very bad for inter country work
especially for Shenzhen
How so?
But that is coming from a country where you have always had to be aware of timezones when crossing borders.
seasonal timezones talks open?
I needed to restore a Geochron World Clock, which first meant learning how they work.
lmao ryzen x3d was a fucking afterthought
"we got all these server x3d chips, what if we put them in am4"
Sponsor: Get the Lexar NM800 Pro w/ Heatsink on Amazon - https://geni.us/2bxWftR
This didn't make the final cut for our upcoming, in-depth lab tour of AMD's testing & engineering campus in Austin, Texas, but the stories told (and the unreleased products shown) were too interesting to cut entirely -- so we branched out the discussion. This covers...
amazing
Yes, that came out already in previous videos.
Extra CCDs from first test batch for the server CPUs that then were used to make couple internal test chips for the OC team, who found out they were great for games.
As in too few CCDs to make another test server CPU.
this is a previous video, i just missed it
Ah, sorry.
so lemme see if I get this right
AMD's strategy;
- use cheap chiplet technology to absolutely shit out top performing EPYCs
- increase cache to compensate for chiplet latency
- use one small CPU die for as many products as possible to get amazing yields and find a use for everything they make
Intel's strategy;
- use extremely expensive chiplet tech (foveros)
- do not increase cache
- use different dies and different packaging for every single market
and then, when the intel xeon sucks and nobody wants it, offer steep rebates and discounts to force through big sales numbers of their much more expensive products
i don't fucking get it
Those extra cache chips were special product for some specific user AFAIK originally.
that's even funnier
Who had load they knew would benefit from it.
And was willing to pay part of the development costs.
though really I just mean more cache without x3d
zen 2 doubled L3 versus zen 1 to compensate for moving the memory controller to an IO die
then zen 3 uses a ringbus to help even more
also like, we have meteor lake, arrow lake, lunar lake, sapphire rapids, emerald rapids, granite rapids, sierra forest, all completely different CPU die designs, completely different packages
it's gotta be so expensive
Also even major internal architecture differences too.
So not even same core design in all.
AMD just makes three kinds of CCD and combines them as needed
(regular, dense, x3d)
and this is how intel ends up with the same profit margin as costco
Well, now they have Zen5 CCD, Zen5c CCD, X3D extra part, but that just is add-on to the normal Zen5 CCD.
And then two different IO dies (consumer, server)
yeah I'm being generous to intel by saying x3d is a different chip
The X3D CCD isn't different for the CCD itself, they all have the connection points for the extra cache.
The X3D CCDs just get thinned and the cache added on top in extra steps.
helps with heat dissipation,l
probably with a bunch of TSVs in the cache die
zen 5's L3 is much smaller than zen 4 so there's already not enough room to put cache on top of it without it overlapping the cores
though again, just a rumour
we'll see soon enough
Hello can i get some help i tried again to see if i can get my mic to work with discord which was a mistake because now its not working in general
what did you do?
to make it not work in general
all i did was unplug it and its not working
which was a mistake
uhh weird. did you plug it in to the right one?
back where it was yes
then i have no idea why it doesnt work in general
but what i do when my mic doent work in discord is that i reset the audio settings
my mic never worked with discord
neither did mine until i reset it
in discord audio settings
well i gotta get it to work in the first place
yea i got it working i can hear myself
had to do this bull
did that twice it did not work
then the best i know is to follow this https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/360045138471-Discord-Voice-and-Video-Troubleshooting-Guide i know you've probably been using it but this is the best advice i can give you
welp as far as i know im never gonna get it to work
Open Windows Volume Mixer and see whether something weird happened there?
Why don't we use holograms to record and display? Is it just sensors problem?
I mean, that would be such an interesting media.
I recommend you watch the 3Blue1Brown video - it's a super delicate process that requires monochromatic light
that's exactly the video that made me ask question
but the limitation of having monochromatic light doesn't seemโข๏ธ fundamental
except it absolutely is fundamental
the whole process depends on interference
it also depends on the reference wave being projected in the exact same matter
also, it's questionable how mass-producable these holograms are - and whether you could do moving picture
the whole reason why holograms are scientifically important in the first place is intereferometry - Grant showed that when they nudged the one object only a tiny bit
i didn't understand the reference about nudging
from when they had the hologram made and the objects still behind the glass, they moved one object in the scene only a little bit
and it created an interference pattern with the image on the glass
i will say that most mind blowing thing is that every shard of initial film can be used as a window into whole scene. kinda reminds of those broken phantasy mirrors. I think Harry Potter had one?..
i need to rewatch this
that's when talking about physical object with recorded information. but digital photo/video industry solved it over film, so I think it is solvable here as well. there are already developments of way to store much more data than we used to on flash or magnetic disks
we don't have the sensor tech necessary to store interference information digitally
and then you still have the monochromatic effect and the incredibly delicate process
i disagree, and here's why:
fundamental theme about hologram is recreating state of wavefront (amplitude and phase)
the fact that figured way to do that with coherent light (single wavelength) is more of detail of known implementation.
just having two wavelengths introduces a whole variety of possible scenario - you have four waves hitting the screen, making four different types of interference, assuming object waves and reference waves don't interfere with each other (which they absolutely do)
F, i wish i could visit Crimea and go to museum of holograms in Chersonesus
Hmmm, i remember it was near old city, near large temple
and the second museum is in Kyiv, in lavra...
i just have one question - why are they near temples?
idk, my local university has a lab working on nonlinear photonics (including holograms)
this is probably naive thought: if you have combination of N1. N2... Ni wavelengths, you record scene with same film, and use the same combination to recreate it. isn't it kinda the same?
well, lab is different matter.
it's a delicate enough process already. now imagine what happened if a single speck of dust would refract a single wave of light to be just SLIGHTLY off
Wait you can lowercase sql commands
i just getting reminded of interview of someone who studied st. Sofia cathedral in Kyiv (yep, another one is in Istanbul), and he was stating that before reconstruction in barocco style there was some visual phenomena with mosaic. and now observing that hologram museums are near temples it makes me question if he was up to somthing ๐
beam splitting screen in front of film that both let's illumination light hit the scene and get reflected onto film...
ok i just realised that it's real hard to rely on recreating light sources when shooting with any possibility of nature interfering
there ya go, that's the whole thing
holograms are delicate enough as is, you'd be more than quadrupling the amount of precision needed
this discussion made me realise that interference is kinda...
we think of it as pattern, right? thin zones of destructive intereferences, peaks and valleys.
but that is already observation over some period of time, that is larger than wave oscilation period.
so when we have ,ultiple wavelengths, superposition principle remains, and interference as well stil lexists, just that it's period get's ... harder to observe patterns.
it's merely a pattern if we simplify it a lot - assuming monochromatic point source of light (or in this case, parallel waves)
we have a whole field of phyics and mathematics dedicated to splitting waveforms into its components - fourier transformations.
Now combine the mess that is monodirectional fourier transformation with the mess that is monochromatic interference into multi-directional multi-composite light interference
ok actually i realised that in some cases there will be no pattern, like here:
https://youtube.com/shorts/nNFDvW0h1_8?si=UoL7qccD38cvb7fZ
The length of the large vector is 1 unit. The length of the small vector is .4 units. The ratio of the velocities in the first graph is 7/2. The ratio of the velocities in the second graph is 2pi.
all digital photography does is capture amplitude in in localised rectangular area behind predifined color filters. half job done.
the other half is merely controlling sun to recreate scene's lighting...
this logic sounds like "you have a 50% chance of winning the lottery - you win or you don't"
also, I don't see how this is related to interference
you might have 2 wavelength that simply don't, like ever, even over long periods of time, establish a pattern of constructive/destructive areas
so question is - do we even need reference light for make awesome recreations of past?
there are those digitally created ones as well
and was it Apple that anounced some weird product with near-hologram capabilities for video calls?
(not apple glasses/vision/whatever)
https://youtu.be/EmKQsSDlaa4?si=sB73tDvAggaIRg4_&t=2159
timestamp to other examples of holograms
3d scenes on 2d film, and a diffraction lesson along the way.
Instead of sponsored ad reads, these lessons are funded directly by viewers: https://3b1b.co/support
An equally valuable form of support is to share the videos.
Hologram credits:
The Microscope is by Walter Spierings, 1984
Donations Hologram by Cherry Optical Holography
Lucy in a Tin...
having studying linear optics since school, and having pretty good grasp over that simple subject i never really thought about how weird it is that you can simultaneously see objects that are "normal" and "inverted".
this video does good job of showcasing that, and in motion! https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xi5oUVhZG6I
Source: @slomoguys @theslomoguys
Intel Recently revealed the Core Ultra Series and they have claimed that the performance of the Core Ultra 9 would be on par with Intel's Core i9 14900K. On Launch day however, the results are completely different and the Core Ultra loses on almost every benchmark by a large margin too! Intel should be held responsible for their claims, this is ...
๐
parity
it still draws 250w...
please let it not be on 18a
oh what, its on n3b
how did they fumble it so hard? a 14900k on n3b would even be an improvement
- no hyperthreading
- clock regression
- increased memory latency
- windows scheduler weirdness
- no extra L3 to compensate for chiplet
cyberpunk and other super modern games are built with hyperthreading in mind, it was unthinkable that high end CPUs would ditch it
so instead of having 16 threads on 8 big cores with extra threads on little cores, you have 8 threads on big cores and more threads getting shifted to little cores
it took this fucking long for games to properly use it, this trend isn't reversing any time soon
it took new console generation for games to expand beyond 4 cores... but i don't think there will be different console anytime soon
golden age of gaming hardware is gone
yeah so long as consoles have hyperthreading, games will be optimised for it
(not all games, there's still shit programming)
i have a feeling that games don't think of consoles as much anymore
are there any big games anounced that would need something like powerful cpu?
if you take 2015 level of cpu performance any game need powerful cpu
it simply now the bottleneck is becoming obviously programming skills and tools and not hardware anymore
Hardware will no longer compensate for programming shit
single threaded performance isn't going to rise like in the old days
and the programming shit starts at os level
where now Linux is more performant in games
even though Linux is tuned for computing
we get 15% after two years and we think that's great
i 'member core 2 duo knocking my socks off
Unless stacking becomes way cheaper, consistent big gains are probably a thing of the past. Otherwise, performance per millimeter of silicon has hit a pretty tough wall.
maybe moar cores at some point
well, yes. i am talking about powerful relative to right now, or even 5 years ago.
Rambler in action:
General Ryzen 7000/9000 AM5 CPU DDR5 and infinity fabric OC information
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcn_nvWGj7U
Dudes, your thoughts on Typst? I kinda hate LATEX so it seems great for me
https://github.com/typst/typst
Source. ||God, anything but LATEX, please...||
AMD can already stack CPU on IO die with integrated vcache, they do it in MI300, hopefully it'll get cheap enough for consumer
intel also has the same tech, foveros direct, but fuck knows if they even want to use it
MI300 is gigantic though. So far AMD hasn't used chiplets to give consumers an unusual amount of overall silicon, it's just broken up in pieces.
It's the same reason HBM isn't coming back to consumers, even the crappiest cutdown versions of anything with HBM will probably sell for thousands.
That is AFAIK the reason next Radeon generation isn't coming to highend.
There was a design, but it used chiplets with substrate tech that didn't pan out at reasonable price and production capacity.
Above the current gen substrate, but below the one used in MI300 and Nvidia equivalents.
And that substrate tech is just way over capacity for those datacenter cards for next year or so until TSMC can bring more capacity online.
there's also the matter of all this packaging tech being highly production constrained
That highest end one.
in this AI gold rush, everything is being sold
so they would much rather dedicate capacity to AI chips than hope people actually buy a radeon this time
probably InFO_LSI
CoWoS-R AFAIK, which would have been just organic interposer RDL InFO without the LSI chips for data that are in the CoWoS-L
Which didn't pan out.
Current low-end is on CoWoS-S and the highend is on CoWoS-L
Instead of the silicon interposers in the CoWoS-S
Or might have been made to work, but would have taken capacity from the CoWoS-L lines pumping out the datacenter chips.
yeag
that does make more sense as 7900 uses InFO RDL
man that's a shame
decided to use a tech years ago that they had no idea would skyrocket in demand
Yeah, it AFAIK uses that CoWoS-S, and 8000-series highest end was designed ot use that CoWoS-R.
And isn't being brought to market for manufacturing reasons, as they just cannot do another pass to not need it in time for this generation when the production side didn't pan out.
there's no credit to amd "not wanting" to make a high end radeon 8000
"yeah we decided we're gonna make mid range chips this time, just as planned"
Ah, no, even the MI300 uses just CoWos-S:
AMDโs MI300 was originally designed on CoWoS-R but we believe due to warpage and thermal stability concerns AMD has to instead use CoWoS-S.
lmfao yeah no fucking way is AMD taking away from MI300
that's their golden goose
god that's tragic
imagine you're on the radeon team
you spent years bringing up navi 44/48
then you see the AI boom
you know MI300 uses your tech
you go home and cry
Based on what I can find, Navi 31 might have used TSMC InFO_oS
Which is below all those CoWoS variants.
Yeah.
So integrated RDL layer on the basic substrate.
Without interposers.
That CoWoS-S has silicon interposer, CoWoS-R would have had organic interposer and CoWoS-L has combination to give the high speed data traces silicon and others organic.
yeah that's what was needed for the memory controller dies
Same idea, more expensive and performant implementations in those steps.
I think the only user of InFO_LSI is apple
Where that -R was supposed to be lower cost alternative to the -S
but they seem to have given up on it, ain't seen an M3 ultra yet
That InFO_LSI is probably alternative name for that CoWoS-L.
they are flipped
one is chip first, the other is wafer first
similar end results but different manufacturing
yeah that's the end result
The TSMC given reference pics are basically the same.
CoWoS-L is LSI chips embedded in the organic interposer for the data lines.
Like the InFO_LSI too seems to be.
Ah, that way.
two different ways to manufacture a similar result
so when they say that next gen radeon isn't targeted for the high end, have they mentioned where it's supposed to land? because the 7900XTX isn't that far behind the 4090, at least not like how badly radeon's been beaten flagship-to-flagship in the past
7000-series had three dies, the 7900 used chiplet one and replacement for that Navi 31 will not be coming in 8000-series, so replacement for 7800XT and down only.
Three? They have two different types, GCD and MCD. Always one GCD and up to six MCDs
Navi 31 is the only one to use chiplets, with two variants (6MCD, 4MCD).
As in that 7900-series models (XTX, XT, GRE).
The other two are monolithic
Navi 32 and Navi 33.
Ok, might be wrong on the Navi 32 being monolithic.
Yeah, I hadn't caught that it had 4x and 3x MCD variants, and that only Navi 33 was monolithic.
And misremembered 7900XT being 4 MCD and not 5.
we're saying they had plans to make a radeon 8900XTX, and now they will not make it
because they'd rather use their factories to make AI stuff
Ah, lower end 7000 are monolithic? Didn't know that, thought all are chiplet based
7900, 7800, 7700 are chiplet, 7600 monolithic
idjit
can't help those who arn't willing to help themselves.
who cares that water as been put in the fuel tank, it's the car which throw a red light at me when I turn the key !
still chiplet 7600*
No, Navi 33 is monolithic:
All the various 7600 versions, and 7700S laptop GPU.
understandable confusion xD
that guy is malding
yeah they really should change that, maybe make radeon only 3 digits long?
790 GRE would have made more sense imo since the last digit is never changed
Gets even more confusing with the 5700xt being a GPU and CPU
yeah I'm not a fan of them using xt on cpu
ryzen is already at 9000 so they'll probably change that to three digits next time, they already did on mobile
If they finally settle on a naming scheme for mobile...
They had like 6 different shemes for the last 4 architectures
hope they ditch the ai shit soon
it's an oem shit
it would be good but there is no way they are actualy gonna do it
xt on cpu us confusing, but what intel is pulling right now is a lot worse
Starting to have problems
this is why I normally stop at a week
think my record is 28 days
debian linux says it's just warmed up at 17 days lol
I'm at almost 80 days on my pve server
Yeah, there's an inane number of wake/sleep cycles on my desktop though
Probably average of like 10/day
I've had windows 10 run fine for like 2 months I think, but no wake/sleep cycles.
Windows really doesn't like those
my desktop keep bsoding so I'd be happy to get a day of uptime out of it.
I thought it was my cpu overheating on satisfactory... which didn't make a lot of sense for a modern cpu, as I'd expect them to hang, or slow to a crawl.
For me random BSOD was a bios issue
I think something is up my with nvme drive now, as I'm not getting any crash dumps, and it doesn't send crash reports, and yesterday the nvme was gone from the bios menu and it wouldn't boot
Oooh
That's no fun
it started only when playing satisfactory, then with just chrome open, and now at the desktop. tonight or tomorrow I'm going to try to reseat the nvme and see if that fixes it.
I've had 116 days on my laptop earlier this year (with sleep wake cycles that is) Worked fine. Lost the time because windows update.
Ahh wow
I've never had anything over 50 days
My desktop is worse about getting buggy after a while than the laptops I've had
It's a struggle with wandows.
I usually hit like 30 max on main pc.
*5600XT
almost like it's confusing ๐คฃ
It is...
I sure love learning stat
Although this chapter has actually been pretty easy to follow
I read "if a radioactive intern" instead of "if a confidence interval" and was very confused about what the hell you were learning
Does anyone know anything about android TV boxes?
Would need one for an older TV.
Maybe some of the aliexpress shit would even work? I got no idea.
Wouldnโt want to spend too much. At first though I could just use a cable and stream from a phone but the apple adapter doesnโt support hdcp.
Chromecast, raspi+libreelec or get a cheap mini PC.
Depends on what you want to use and how to interact
cheap tv box is less expensive than either option
๐
Do you mean like cable? No, it definitely isn't cheaper lol
I love windows update:)
this is true correct?
games no?
and optimized for nvidia is just them having long standing cuda support where as amd has rocm which still sucks to this day
Cuda and rocm are more for General computing rather than gaming. For gaming its DirectX, Vulcan and OpenGL.
Most games are more optimzed for nvidia because it has the higer market share
No xable. I mean like a small tv box with android that cna connect over wifi , has some hdmi and usb port
Zluda
Nvidia has a long standing collaboration with OBS which they use to optimize the synergy between Nvenc and OBS
amd doesn't like it anymore
Which is ironic given that it beats ROCm
That's probably why they don't like it
since we mentioned uptime yesterday.
Nice
@Kepler_L2 Although PTL will reintegrate IMC into the compute die, NVL will once again separate and optimize it.
why the fu

you trying to tell me I need to update my kernel? lol
nah why u got a server with a ryzen
4th gen intel gang lmao
(also update your kernel)
so apple magic mouse now has USB C instead of lightning. But the port is still on the bottom of the mouse ๐
reminds of Brennan Lee Mulligan: "I will die on ANY hill!"
update your kernel ๐
Eventually
Because ryzen 5x makes a decent home server cpu. I should've gone for the x3d variant but this works well enough
IM SO FED UP WITH THIS GARBAGE
questionable source
the guy doesnt even have these two CPUs
wait what
oh well i reported his channel (nothing is going to happen) and left a sweeeeeet comment for him:
๐ซ Beware of sketchy comparison videos ๐ซ
Some YouTube channels upload hardware comparison videos at a suspicious & unrealistic rate, sometimes several per day. There is no assurance that these channels use reliable and fair testing methodology, so the results in the videos could be inaccurate due to negligence, or intentional manipulation in accordance with the channel owner's agenda.
Try to stick to more reliable and reputable sources like Gamers Nexus, Hardware Unboxed (Techspot), and TechPowerUp.
someone made this copypasta once
who the heck names CPU "ultra 7 265k"?
did they name it as april fools joke but someone forgot to re-draw ideas?
i diets
or is intel run by 12 year olds?
suspiciosly fast upload rate:check:
500 views
seems legit
its not even the views
i honestly think that side-by-side comparison is quite a waste of time. especially when it's not on a streamlined benchmark (script)
like there are many small things that point to the whole thing being fake
ok i just don't want to even think of hardware media world. i will let it be
even if it wasn't fake, it'd still be inaccurate
yup
I meant the methodology, not the results
yeah that too
the results are a direct consequence of the methodology being "I made it the fuck up"
๐ ๐ ๐ approved analasis
hehe, anal
idk but the name alone is setting this generation straight to the garbage especially when they could have made it the 230k,250k,270k,290k
yeah why not go with 290k instead of "285K"
it would be so much simpler
yup
unless they are saving it for the next one and using this generation as a public test but its still atrocious
yeah the 290k could be the KASS of the ultra series (with how intel decided to name them)
or maybe they would name it 285KS
And Half the Waranty for NO reason whatsoever:)
oh,and we dont garanty that your house wont light on fire ๐
Intel: What a resonable name! now substract 5 from it
14nm ++ +++
math is my favorite kind of anal
same thing
pretty much
I mean, it's a top of the line CPU, of course they'll have it come with a free Gigabyte P850GM PSU
amds new laptop naming sceme isn't much better