#Would love a pair of eyes on `unifi_

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

frosty wind
#

Using a lock entity for that device will be a bad user experience since we don't have separate supported features for all the lock actions, ie lock and unlock. It's only the open action that has a supported feature.

#

I'd consider using a button and a binary sensor instead.

#

And the open action should normally not do the same thing as the unlock action. They have different meanings. The open action is optional as it has a supported feature.

#

Note that we don't or at least haven't enforced strict rules regarding that all actions without supported features should work. I think we have examples of partial support in integrations.

#

No solution is great, I think.

dense rock
#

I mean, if it truly could only unlock I'd be fine, but then the unlock action must be the right context

frosty wind
#

The benefit of the lock is that you can access the state and the actions from the same place. The downside is that it's confusing that the lock action errors and doesn't work.