#Naming the photo frame integration
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Naming the photo frame integration
One more proposal, thumbs up this message to vote for it:
- Collection image
May I add one proposal @void horizon (And vote on it ๐ )
Yes, why not.
One more proposal, thumbs up this message to vote for it:
- Random image
I at one point considered that (random), but I don't think it necessarily has to be random. Like I would assume there will also be a select image service, where you can pick a specific image.
I think if you make that the name it becomes restrictive.
Well yes that's because we're not allowed to add anything to start with ๐
supposed to be barebones
But yes, I haven't mapped out exactly everything that this intended to support longterm yet.
random image ๐
(joke)
Of course if you have other plan then it makes no sense, agreed
Poll: Naming the photo frame integration
(That GIF is bad I just saw he's clearly dubbing "Shut up" ๐ Sorry)
One thing for sure: it should not be named "photo frame", as that's just one example use case of this integration.
Have you other use cases in mind? Like I think that just covers "displaying an image", but are you thinking of a different case?
Image can be anything, not just "photos". It can be displayed on many things, not just "frames".
Ok, I can see that the word photo may be considered an unnecessarily restrictive subset of image.
Same as the "frame" sounds restrictive
IMHO it is a media collection
it is picked from the media browser
as a matter of fact, could as well be a folder in there
or a favorites collection
or anything else
Eventhough it is the highest votes right now, I'm pretty strongly against Photo Frame as that is representing a physical devices users have an idea on what such a thing looks like... which this is not.
Agreed about that part yeah
I would also love the if the name convey the fact you get only one element of that collection.
Hence my proposal of Random image but now that understand it could very well be not random the name does not really work
I don't really like collection personally just because I would assume I can like .. browse it....
Yeah... I wonder if we should explore this from a favorites/collections capability of the media browser instead
as in, would be great if those could be made in general
๐ซ I'm not sure I follow where you're going with that. Do we still want this to create an image entity, or is that not certain?
instead of "Image collection", call it "Collection image", so that it does not sound like it is a collection
(in reply to JLo's concern about browsing it)
and I removed my votes because I agree with JLo, "Image Collection", "Picture Album" etc make it sound like it is a collection of things
Poor Erik. Sorry I started the derailing. Iโm the derailer
@drifting kraken So, it's soon been 2 weeks since you stepped in here. Do you have a name yet?
uh?
I need to decide that?
Let's me put it on the Core meeting agenda of today
Yeah. You said no. You can't just say no, you need to propose something; same rule as when choosing where to eat.
You can't just say no, you need to propose something
Sorry, that is not what I said. I wrote I'm strongly against
I also do not agree on that I need to propose somehting just because I shared my view on things
I've added it to the agenda today, let discuss it further there
Some extra "inspo": https://immichframe.dev/