#Backups
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
🤣
I really like the idea of storing encryption key for backups in a passkey! https://confer.to/blog/2025/12/passkey-encryption/
We want private AI chat to be simple. Yet today, many end-to-end encrypted experiences still have a level of friction that make them feel like they’re from another era: it usually either involves a long seed phrase users are asked to “store securely,” insecure password based encryption, or apps that aren’t cross-device and lose your data...
I like the idea of logging into HA using a passkey 😜 I like the idea of using it for backups as well (passkeys FTW), but first party OS support is currently too limited imo
Is it ? I thought it's in all browsers and OSes
Make a proposal for pass key in HA, we're not against but it's an impactful change
From your linked article
I've seen you turn down one too many PRs to put meaningful time into that before aligning with you 😅
That article talks about extension, not the core passkey
But you'd need said extension for passkey backups don't you
Oh sure! I was thinking about doing it for login first
your last comment regarding passkeys that I remember was that you were worried people would lock themselves out of HA on other devices
Yeah but the implementation has matured. I still think it's bad if it's the only way to log in
But if we can guide people to add passkey, and make it later optional to remove password
WebAuthN will be an authentication provider
I believe I left some comments for improvement on the last attempt
So we have a challenge in that username is part of the HA provider
And tied to password
I believe the last implementation was pulling from that provider but as per the docs I just linked, that link cannot exist
And didn’t you want to externalize passkeys to OIDC then?
Though I think we really should offer a native implementation as passkeys are beginning to spread everywhere
This is what I see every time I backup before updating HA, not really a great experience. It says failed, though it's backing up in the background, there is no clear indication on the screen what's happening, and you have to go Backup settings section to know what's going on.
It's been like this for several release now, and I'm sure it's been reported somewhere
When I have to restore HA I need to do some manual monitoring because I have SSL, an FQDN, and the restriction to only access HA this way. Unfortunately, the restoration process doesn't "switch" to the restored access and I have to monitor the restoration using journalctl at the server console. Is there a way to complete the restoration when the restored setup has an encrypted access? Maybe I'm missing something.
Another interesting thing would be to add in the restoration process documentation a step to create a reservation on the user's DHCP for the final IP address. This is important for those who have a static IP address set and integrations referring this IP such as dnsmasq or other MQTT based devices trying to connect to the old IP.