I was trying to go into Matter over Thread with some ESP32 boards, but ran into issues since some of my network wasn't doing IPv6 (since my ISP didn't support it). Does the ZBT2 make Matter + Thread work regardless of IPv6 on the Network? I am still doing IPv4 only since IPv6 is still getting traction (10+ years in the deployment)
#ZBT2 and IPv6.
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
My understanding is that you don’t need the isp to support ipv6 since it’s the thread mesh that communicates over ipv6
Your home network has nothing to do with thread
Thread is its own network which happens to route using ipv6 local addresses generated by your tbr
To answer your question in more detail, the ZBT2 just acts as the RCP, basically a fancy antenna that knows how to send and receive thread packets
But the actual processing happens on a separate device (typically a HA instance with the OTBR addon)
So yes, it’ll work without isp support for ipv4 (since they’re not really related) but so would your esp32 solution if configured correctly
It’s just a little more plug and play with HA compared to setting up a whole third-party TBR on an esp32
Another analogy to explain better, the esp32 solution is probably more like making your own Apple HomePod (a thread border router), the zbt2 is a addon to HA that makes HA the TBR
@raw atlas yea, I kept having issues reprovisioning the ESP32s3 as TBR and it wouldn't I kept having issues because of the IPv6 on Wifi requirement because my routers had it disabled internally. Tried to get it working, but the IPv6 from my cell on wifi to TBR to then get the device to pair to the TBR was a pain and I kept running into road blocks that I just gave up on and went back to Zigbee on the last few devices I ordered.
Does the ZBT2 have a different functionality than the ZBT1 or is it identical functionality* , just better hardware?
Interesting, I’m reading the esp32 OTBR setup and it seems like they set up IPv6 connectivity so devices on both the WiFi and thread networks can communicate
Without needing translation
I guess that’s the “ideal” setup for a TBR since you can abstract away the transport layer and pretend everything can communicate using a single interface
I hate IPv6. I have to learn it one of these days, just not today :D.
But I also don’t know any thread devices that actually
Would need to communicate with anything else on your network
Right? I mean Matter over Thread should be self contained and only need IPv4/6 or USB to the TBR devices from HA and thats it.
should
I really can’t think of a good use case for this
I mean Zigbee will be around for at least 5 years, zWave probably too.
Hubitat gateway (what I setup at the time) does the magic there so it just works then imports into HA.
I mean the IPv6 network joined with your WiFi network
When do you ever need a WiFi device to communicate with one of your smart home devices without going through HA
This is just me trying to figure out why they insist on IPv6 setup lol
yea, dual stack IP addressing has so few limited use cases. and everything does IPv4 to IPv6 translation on the internet.
But yeah my understanding is they’re the same
The zbt2 is just more optimized on the hardware side
But I don’t think the changes make a huge difference for most people
I mean some ISPs need it because they are running out of IPv4 addresses, but they are still dual stack so its still using both addresses.
Unless you’re running a ton of devices across a really big house
Yea, I'll probably wait until a Hubitat for Matter+Thread comes out and stick with that so its contained and backing up - well whenever I do my next upgrade.
And have no zigbee repeaters
I think I'm up to 40 devices - mostly Zigbee handfull of zwave
and I'm not doing matter over wifi.
has to be over thread because I don't want that on my wifi bands
Just curious, what benefit does hubitat have over HA
I have it doing a backup because at the time I was moving HA between Virtualization stuff and if I mess up home assistant, I can just connect to my Hubitat since it was a hub for both Zigbee + ZWave. I could also place it in a more centralized place away from my server.
I use it as a dumb hub that I just connect through. probably overkill, but it was a 'throw money at it' solution.
I'm trying to get away from Alexas and Google devices. I don't own anything Apple.
Fair
so Open Source or bust
Difficult these days to entirely get away from them tho
I'm mostly there. Custom HA Voice Speaker - test case currently that I need to finish tuning then I will be 95% ready to kick the major companies out. no more data mining here 😄
The HA Voice Previews aren't bad, but I didn't like the built in speaker and I wanted something cleaner than an external speaker attached to it.
But Sonos - who I WAS going to use, all has Alexa now....
so they are off my list.
I can do some custom creative stuff with this - https://docs.futureproofhomes.net/satellite1-squircle-enclosures/#choose-a-speaker-and-enclosure-size
Just need to finish testing
I built one and the audio quality is decent.
I rent though, so difficult to justify investing effort + money when I have to take it all out next time I move lol
Agreed there. Plug in outlets get old.
Ive started replacing some light switches, but I'm done renting.
Looking at smart outlets, but can't find ones I like.
The Eve thread ones looked good, but noooo only on Matter+Thread
Yea.... maybe.
Tbf it’s not like zigbee is bad tho
yea. Zigbee works. Does energy measurement + reliable.
The only real downside is single point of failure
Just seems like Thread+Matter is where things are heading.
Hoping that we get a few years of dual zigbee/matter over thread
As much as matter over thread is cool, it’s also been a pain to get working
I’d rather have devices on zigbee for now
yep. I spent probably 20 hours a few weeks ago on it and just gave up.
I got it working after about that same amt of time but it’s not the most reliable
All my devices stop working for 30 min after a power cycle
Been thinking of getting an Apple TBR since that’s been the most reliable based on online forums
o o o The thing I forgot
But I wouldn’t use any of the other functionality so feels like a waste of money
They need to just do Matter + THread as a standard DONE. Not Matter over wifi + Matter over Thread
Yes..
Espc I have some devices fhat are
And I REFUSE
They may need to be taken out back.....
I get the advantage of separating the transport layer and everything
Someone is a Network engineer 😄
But really matter over WiFi feels like a downgrade
"Transport Layer" - Gotta be in IT and Networking support lol
Close 😂
I'm a cloud Architect with the history in on-prem tech.
I’m just a software engineer
ooo So you are the reason DNS broke. 🤣
My team works on networking infra tho
But it’s several layers of abstraction away since everything is cloud these days lol
that was me...