Only now do I notice that none of my Z-Wave Fibaro flood sensors have their tamper binary sensors anymore. Apparently the integration no longer creates those, and the old ones can be deleted? When did this happen, if indeed it is the case, and I didnt run into an issue....
I did try to reinstall one, and tampered wi
th the cover (it squeeks heavily, indicating something is messing wpth the packing), but no alert in Z-wave integration anymore.
#Zwave Fibaro tamper cover binaries are gone?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
For questions like these, post the device diagnostic file (go to device page, ..., download diagnostic).
These also include the entity IDs, so you can clearly indicate which are the binary sensors, and which are the "old ones".
yes, thx. Let me check that.
I believe I've found the change, they are renamed into these, and found in the Diagnostic section now. Should have noticed that before posting.
There was a change to omit creation of sensor, not binary_sensor. Nothing is renamed.
probably misremember the exact change, and I cant reproduce them because I deleted the no longer available ones...
do you know which release that was, so I can re-read that please?
You seem to be saying the opposite though.
Not clear if deleting the "old ones" was the correct move, hence need to see diagnostic.
You're confusing me, are the binary_sensor gone, or sensor? The latter is expected.
You initially said binary...
I see there is currently binary_sensor.attic_flood_sensor_home_security_tampering_product_cover_removed
sorry... I am confused too... I remembered the binaries to have different names and another place in the device overview. Hence my ask for binaries
I then found the tamper binaries in the diagnostics section and as you say they werent renamed
I would not expect the entity IDs to change. I don't think HA will ever do that.
yes I have those for all 4 of my flood sensors.
So seems to be working fine then, besides confusion introduced by the change?
Usually the corresponding sensor was disabled by default. Having both was confusing.
thanks for taking the time
Those ones also require having knowledge about Z-Wave specification details to use properly
explaining
No problem. Not sure how HA can communicate breaking changes like this (someone could have been using old entities in an automation) since there's no such category in the release notes now.
yeah, that can be difficult. but since there almost always is a dedicated section for Z-wave required latest version, maybe use that spot to indicate why, and reference the PR's?
Yeah, that's in the "Backwards compatible" section, which doesn't quite make sense.
and probably in the All changes
which I always read completely before installing..... seems it didnt ring a bell this time
final question please: the tamper cover, is that for lifting the device, and for opening it? Or cant you tell that from the device diagnostics
Removing the cover.
Possible the device could implement it for the former, but it's meant for opening it.
I think Zooz is using it for vibration in one of their sensors.
right, I ask because when I lift it, it starts beeping
Seems your device has a configuration option for that.
Actually that's for association groups. Looks like it considers both as tamper.
"commandClassName": "Configuration",
"property": 74,
"propertyName": "Alarm frame for movement/tamper",
"ccVersion": 1,
"metadata": {
"type": "number",
"readable": true,
"writeable": true,
"description": "Movement/tamper alarm sent to 1st & 4th assoc. group",
"label": "Alarm frame for movement/tamper",
"default": 2,
"min": 0,
"max": 3,
"states": {
"0": "Tamper alarm inactive",
"1": "Button tamper alarm active",
"2": "Movement tamper alarm active",
"3": "Button and movement tampers alarm active"
},
Yours is set to 3
Try changing it to 1.
this one? this is the current setting
wow thats all very crafty 😉
Fibaros, for all their downsides, have a lot of config options.
well, I didnt change it, so that needs some closer inspection... thanks! I now know where to check these things, appreciated!
Here's the entry from your diagnostic:
"23-112-0-74": {
"endpoint": 0,
"commandClass": 112,
"commandClassName": "Configuration",
"property": 74,
"propertyName": "Alarm frame for movement/tamper",
"ccVersion": 1,
"metadata": {
"type": "number",
"readable": true,
"writeable": true,
"description": "Movement/tamper alarm sent to 1st & 4th assoc. group",
"label": "Alarm frame for movement/tamper",
"default": 2,
"min": 0,
"max": 3,
"states": {
"0": "Tamper alarm inactive",
"1": "Button tamper alarm active",
"2": "Movement tamper alarm active",
"3": "Button and movement tampers alarm active"
},
"valueSize": 1,
"format": 0,
"allowManualEntry": false,
"isFromConfig": true
},
"value": 3
},
and these trigger the binary in HA? or just the beep on the device