#Led ble should only be used for lights

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

prisma ibex
#

Ok, would be a new integration then. The "Fluval Protocol" starts with 0x68, is pseudo-encrypted (just a bunch of xor-ing) and quite different to the 0x81-protocol as far as I can see.

#

So I finish the ESPHome integration first to have a template and full set of commands / reply parsing, then I will get a few books on python and try to be as compliant to the guidelines as possible. 🙂

fast mango
#

I have my own integration for BLE based lighting, UniLed, whilst it was based on the led_ble integration it has moved on to become more of a framework to make it much easier to quickly add new devices, check it out at my repo

#

It already supports a number of different protocols, so adding another should be easy

#

Its installable as a HACS integration and whilst I have looked at moving the core code into a pypi library, I haven't the time at the moment to figure out all the nuances of the pipy packaging, Given this also intended to support many different devices its unlikely it would be adopted as an official integration, but works for me 🙂

#

This was my first ever Python and HA development as well, so I am sure there could be improvements, but happy to help you get your device supported

#

in UniLed

#

If you intend or need to access through the ble proxies running on ESPs etc. I can say I cannot get any of my devices to work at the moment, I think its an issue within the proxy but again little time to fully investigate. On my todo list.