#Group Entity Sequence

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

pearl bluff
#

Does anyone know?

quartz nymph
#

No, that order is for the long gone old UI, nothing more

pearl bluff
#

Are you saying this used to be possible when groups were only configurable via .yaml?

quartz nymph
#

No

#

I'm saying that once upon a time there was a UI before the current one

#

That UI used the group order for laying out "cards" in the UI (only they weren't cards, they were groups)

#

That setting has never made any difference to the behaviour of controlling the group

pearl bluff
#

OK, off I go to add a feature request. Thanks.

plain ingotBOT
#

The XY problem is asking about your attempted solution rather than your actual problem.

quartz nymph
#

What's the actual problem

#

There's almost certainly a solution, or a way to do whatever your goal is

pearl bluff
#

There's no "problem." I have 12 Somfy shades integrated via my Bond Bridge (RF transmitter) and grouped in various ways. When I lower/raise a group, I'd prefer them to move in a predictable way. It seems that if the group functionality already sends service calls in a certain order (e.g. alphabetical, ?), that the frontend could be updated to allow for user configuration of that order. I know I can do this in other ways, but (1) that only helps me and (2) then I'd have to bother with workarounds to properly program the frontend instead of just using stock/mushroom cover cards.

quartz nymph
#

There's likely to be some form of programmatic order, but it's not formally documented

pearl bluff
#

Exactly. If the feature request gets any attention, that will come to light. Thanks.