#Different Tanks are supposed to be different

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

chrome jetty
#

I understand that the devs are parts are of the community wants the vehicles to be balanced, which is fair. But different tanks are supposed to be different. Tanks should have performance based on the historical counter part, this is what makes tank games interesting, that each tank has unique handling and traits.

This is very noticeable in the new arty vehicles, each faction's arty vehicles are basically all identical but with different skins. Why?? It doesn't make sense that a Churchill AVRE has similar performance to Sherman 105, it makes even less that either of them has an AP shell that deals massive damage? Diff faction are supposed to play different, it would be really cool if the brits gets a short range bunker buster, american get a easily reposition-able arty, germans gets a medium range seige cannon etc

As an aside, Sherman 105's weapon name is OQF 57mm. Come on guys

minor osprey
#

bunker buster would probabaly require a whole set of new mechanics to be implemented, or what are you suggesting? Idk what you mean with siege canon either. Sure its cool if there is variation, and there should be some, at least to the degree that the tanks currently handle different, difference in ammo amount, speed, mobility etc. Asking for bunker busters is just ridiculous imo, besides tanks can now shoot down buildable defenses with enough hits, so can precision strike. When you suggest things you have to think about what it actually means what your suggesting, and how that would be implemented.